Make sure to check out chessbrahstore.com for our merch! We now have joggers in stock, which can offer +200 ELO without need for an engine
@TheSoulBlossom3 жыл бұрын
I want those joggers!
@filipkorosec1023 жыл бұрын
What about JORTS?!
@theTeflonDon13 жыл бұрын
Lmao!
@bigbeefeyproductions27493 жыл бұрын
Where did the joggers go
@mislavivkovic99963 жыл бұрын
Why? So if u lost they get banned 83 percent is not 98 percent
@Monadshavenowindows3 жыл бұрын
bean_tweak: plays crazy sharp moves and pins GM’s pieces left and right. also bean_tweak: doesn’t know how to prevent back rank mate.
@MiSTeRJoKe963 жыл бұрын
He mastered everything except how to prevent a backrank mate ahah
@DrentifulGaming3 жыл бұрын
and twice at that!
@Tideman113 жыл бұрын
Like playing like a GM and 400 in the same game.
@gana72063 жыл бұрын
@@MiSTeRJoKe96 his only weakness
@cesar.sandovalcolon3 жыл бұрын
@@MiSTeRJoKe96 He just ran out of ideas 😂
@BobfromSydney3 жыл бұрын
To paraphrase a quote about a plagiarised essay: "I found your Chess games to be both good and original. Unfortunately the moves that were good were not original and the moves that were original were not good."
@AmineMuhammad-d3s8 күн бұрын
ass quote tbh
@jvplaster3 жыл бұрын
Bruh I just love their contrasting personalities... Aman tries to flag the cheaters while Eric tries to outthink stockfish
@pairot013 жыл бұрын
They didn't think he was cheating during the game.
@jvplaster3 жыл бұрын
@@pairot01 I meant generally btw, in older videos
@user-420i3 жыл бұрын
Aman wins against bots in bullet and hyperbullet, it's crazy how he moves so fast
@jvplaster3 жыл бұрын
@@user-420i ikr like bruh imagine getting flagged even after using engine, Aman is a beast when it comes to dirty tactics
@MrVannspreder3 жыл бұрын
@Utsav Joshi Is Stockfish really using neural networks now? For a long time they didn't.
@UnionRing3 жыл бұрын
"I just ran out of ideas" You didn't have any
@starboiklem83813 жыл бұрын
He ran of ouf fishes
@DrkMike3 жыл бұрын
His one and only idea was to cheat and then it didn't work.
@naseempopov90133 жыл бұрын
@@starboiklem8381 lol
@chazmichels42803 жыл бұрын
More like "oh crap, they think I'm cheating so I better throw the game at the end and say 'I ran out of ideas'." Lmao smh
@mikes19843 жыл бұрын
he doesnt have any because he ran out
@kozatas3 жыл бұрын
He lost on purpose and hoped for a commend like "wow you play so strong for a 1900". He tried to start a conversation on both games.
@erdling31323 жыл бұрын
His real rating was probably 300 lmao, every move he did on his own was a blunder
@hammurabitheawesome6743 жыл бұрын
Nah, at least in the second game he played some Stafford theory, engines normally don't suggest the h4 and ng4 moves because they are not actually that good if the other player plays properly.
@dimitrifrog78453 жыл бұрын
@@hammurabitheawesome674 so he knows how to use google, amazing.
@hammurabitheawesome6743 жыл бұрын
@@dimitrifrog7845 Lol im not praising him or anything I'm just saying that your average 300 probably wouldn't know that.
@advertisingmenta59933 жыл бұрын
@@hammurabitheawesome674 your average whatever can still watch rosen knowing theory doesnt make shit moves better
@pkermen3 жыл бұрын
@@hammurabitheawesome674 im a 350, can confirm. know fuckall about anything
@stevenpaul71143 жыл бұрын
Bean_tweak: "I can take it on my own from here..."
@foldvarigabor72293 жыл бұрын
This guy playing 3 minute with an engine and just blundering when his time gets low. Jeez what a smooth brain move.
@shinetalent3 жыл бұрын
Bean_tweak: Okay, It seems I got him good already, dont need to cheat using engine anymore. *next move, blunders rook*
@pahoellyyy3 жыл бұрын
and back rank mate 😂
@thewayihandleit3 жыл бұрын
It must be so obvious to GM's when they play against a cheater... that dude was not subtle like he thought he was
@jamesknapp643 жыл бұрын
I mean there could be gambit lines that people know like in the Mora that get them in a winning position then blunder the middle and endgames. The position Eric had in the middle game all but one of the guys moves I were moves I was thinking of making, of course I made the same blunders, idk what that says about me or the cheater. Amans game looked way more like a stockfish user with the Knight sac for activity was someone no one on that dudes level would do. Then they followed it up with constant pressure until the end when they stopped using it.
@platonfoucault10873 жыл бұрын
To get a player 1000Elo above you sweating when he is actually playing seriously is just impossible without cheating. Miracles do not happen in chess, luck does not make for such a big part of the game.
@quazzydiscman3 жыл бұрын
@@jamesknapp64 stop cheating bro
@user-420i3 жыл бұрын
As a 1900 i can relate that id be completely crushed by Eric even with 5 minutes against 1
@thewayihandleit3 жыл бұрын
yeah thats the MO of cheaters, to play those gambit/off beat lines where there's inaccuracies to try and throw off anti cheating software but like you say some of the moves he played would never be played by a 1900. Also the typical way to beat a cheater is just flagging them and you can see how the quality of the moves instantly drops when there's time pressure. Eric seems to try and out think the cheater though LOL
@60xFPS3 жыл бұрын
the brahs got their beans tweaked
@rewrittenbytes16163 жыл бұрын
222 likes no comments
@raghav38573 жыл бұрын
@@rewrittenbytes1616 we had to do something bout that oh wait we did
@jordanferta82123 жыл бұрын
333 likes 2 comments
@rewrittenbytes16163 жыл бұрын
@@raghav3857 ayeee
@abelchess84303 жыл бұрын
Let me contribute
@kingoverlorder20943 жыл бұрын
Lmao both Eric and aman were going for different playstyles against stockfish
@topgunjoeicdbko3 жыл бұрын
Not really
@pancakes96483 жыл бұрын
Both ended up in backrank mate
@yoloswaggins21613 жыл бұрын
"i think i had you" Why do cheaters always say stuff like this.
@Yakushii3 жыл бұрын
It's so stupid. They lose because they get low on time, and have to play for themselves, then it's always "oh I choked, but I had you though, right?" I swear, it says a lot about the mentality of someone who cheats, and then proceeds to try and get praise for something they didn't do.
@manhetna63503 жыл бұрын
Thats alibi, for not cheating
@patstaysuckafreeboss80063 жыл бұрын
@@Yakushii It's called trolling. Not exactly a hard thing to understand lol
@silverzelricc80833 жыл бұрын
coz they need to compensate for having supa smol pee pee. with his moves on the later half of both the games, he's prolly only rated about 1100
@mhqa_3 жыл бұрын
Its like they are trying to make people believe that they were not cheating which is stupid in my opinion
@SquibbyJ3 жыл бұрын
Imagine getting a really clean position with a clear unifying idea and then claiming you ran out of ideas
@orangenasa3 жыл бұрын
Good job to the big chess creators noticing that people want to see cheater content
@biobagholder80813 жыл бұрын
i want players i can relate to is that so hard
@stealthyfang36603 жыл бұрын
This probably only makes cheating against them worse tbh
@dinahassan38573 жыл бұрын
You are smart
@starboiklem83813 жыл бұрын
Yes, nothing better than watching gms play against the greatest chess player of all time without knowing it 😛
@emmahams31743 жыл бұрын
Yah....if am playing a gm...of course I would use some engine help...do I look sun....hahahah🤣
@alexsehe3 жыл бұрын
When you are so bad at chess that you can’t understand what the engine is doing. Then you stop using the engine and you can’t see the pin the engine had effortlessly created on the board. 🤣🤣🤣
@kevinreyeskev24753 жыл бұрын
Even the way he messages sounds like a 900 😂
@reinsaxony46233 жыл бұрын
Wtf the guy was wrecking him at 1900 and then blundered everything lmao.
@none86803 жыл бұрын
"I just ran out of ideas" Dude you never had one
@hellstormangel3 жыл бұрын
I mean if you're going to cheat against 2 gms on stream, then at least win.
@ammster12343 жыл бұрын
I think he plays trappy openings and follows the engine lines, then when he gets low on time he plays on his own and thats when he blunders the game
@frederikzinn54273 жыл бұрын
@@ammster1234 That would not be cheating i think. That is opening prep.
@bobbysnobby3 жыл бұрын
@@ammster1234 or he threw to try and confuse people away from identifying him as cheating
@dmythica3 жыл бұрын
@@frederikzinn5427 nah, he plays an opening, which is opening prep, then let's the engine decide the rest of his moves until he gets low on time. Then makes shit moves.
@alessandrofinocchi56083 жыл бұрын
@@dmythica He had almost a minute against Eric. How is that "low on time"?
@Dave__AC3 жыл бұрын
Pooja's brother?
@Alex-ck5pz3 жыл бұрын
Teacher)
@troyootipep53 жыл бұрын
Yes but more worse lol
@w451-qx3kx3 жыл бұрын
sweet pooja ;(
@lucasmatsuoca3 жыл бұрын
perhaps, the smooth brain they two have might be a genetic correlation
@teenspirit13 жыл бұрын
aman can actually recognize stockfish and get it stale to win on time. He's pretty amazing.
@KevinLuWX3 жыл бұрын
Plays at 2500+ level for 30 moves, then ELO suddenly drops by 1500 points when time drops below 30 seconds
@Flame-zn7jp2 жыл бұрын
Rude to 1000s haha. He played much worse.
@seanbailey85453 жыл бұрын
FeelsBadMan a Canadian cheating against his homies...
@quazzydiscman3 жыл бұрын
4real... That never happens in other countries 🙄🙄🙄
@anonnnnnnnnnnnn3 жыл бұрын
glory to bosnia
@aravind29663 жыл бұрын
@@quazzydiscman *India* Edit:I'm indian btw
@aburriiiiiiiiiiido3 жыл бұрын
You can put a Canadian flag on chess. com despite being from another country
@MrFreeGman3 жыл бұрын
The dude should run for office
@emptyarms61133 жыл бұрын
“I think I had you” lmfao
@wsemenske3 жыл бұрын
"It doesn't matter if you win by a Pawn or a Queen, winning's winning"
@Clementine4163 жыл бұрын
@@wsemenske i get that reference ahah good one
@emptyarms61133 жыл бұрын
@Onyx ?
@talchemy94913 жыл бұрын
You can really tell when he stops using the engine. Instantly blunders the house
@talchemy94913 жыл бұрын
Imagine cheating and still losing both games 😅
@VanguardX3 жыл бұрын
cheaters always get destroyed in endgame because stockfish needs ~3 seconds to calculate a move. So they wind up just bludering everything.
@adlex12123 жыл бұрын
@@VanguardX I don't think stockfish takes that long, it's more likely the player has to make all the moves on a second board and that takes time.
@Jartran728 ай бұрын
@@VanguardX Nah, looking at the move and copying the move is what screws them up
@warrenz5973 жыл бұрын
5:12 I can almost see buddy loading the pieces onto the analysis board
@YeaaaboiAlwin3 жыл бұрын
HE LITERALLY set up that pin on the king early in the game, and couldn't "see" it when it was the most obvious lol. "I just ran out of ideas..." Sure buddy.
@lexevo3 жыл бұрын
Truly, sincerely, actually, honestly, seriously, clearly, certainly, genuinely all words that can be used instead of literally. Might as well be a male using air quotes. If you’re 12 or younger or English is your second language, I apologize. Then it’s fine.
@buyukyollarnhaydudu8233 жыл бұрын
@@lexevo english is my second language . What is wrong with using "literally" ?
@singingtrains54683 жыл бұрын
@@buyukyollarnhaydudu823 Look up the definition. This is like the opposite scenario of when you should be using litterally.
@YeaaaboiAlwin3 жыл бұрын
@@lexevo No. Truly, sincerely, honestly, certainly, and genuinely wouldn't fit as well in this context.
@andrewferguson69013 жыл бұрын
Are you all fucking high? He LITERALLY used the word exactly the way it's defined. Get this pedantic bullshit out of here.
@NatalieDemary3 жыл бұрын
Plays like an engine, messages like a bot, blunders like a 16th seed POGchamp
@ellyazar67643 жыл бұрын
Hahaha classic cheaters. He wanted an attention. Played like super computer moves then blundered n be like “owow we im suckk...wow we im terrible..” lmaooo 😂😂😂😂 glad he got banned.
@buddybuythis38893 жыл бұрын
Everyone is on a Stafford vibe. Thanks Eric Rosen.
@dcorzo3 жыл бұрын
3 months after your comments and I'm still playing the Stafford gambit. it hardly ever works anymore
@Jartran728 ай бұрын
The Stafford Gambit is really losing if you just remember a couple prep moves. Like you have to play from more than 1.0 difference after the opening. If you are anywhere above 1500 this will have a hard time working.
@ezekielmanila38953 жыл бұрын
Funning thing about chess.com is that when chess youtubers or popular GMs report an account they immediately take action, when common people nevermind.😅...i reported someone having 97 to 98 accuracies in 10 games with 1600 rating never get banned. thats why lichess is better because they immediately take action regardless who reported popular or not
@theTeflonDon13 жыл бұрын
You gotta give him some credit for a pretty solid name
@BenKuyt643 жыл бұрын
Eric: Oh, man, he almost got me, blundered in the end, unlucky. Aman: Woah, what the fuck is this guy doing with his insane lines? Two completely different mentalities and I fucking love both.
@TH-dg2mm3 жыл бұрын
I'm from Toronto and when the city reopens I really need Coda to do a weirdass Nicole Moudaber chess show at like 10am on a Wednesday.
@TheNameOfJesus3 жыл бұрын
This is why lawyers ask you never to take the witness stand. Because most of the people in this thread conclude he was guilty on the basis of his own words.
@thetrickster423 жыл бұрын
Nope, it’s because the last shot of the video shows he got banned from Chess.com for cheating
@Cardtrix773 жыл бұрын
Can’t believe there’s actually people who are as dumb as a sack of rocks. If you can’t tell when someone’s a blatant cheater, your head is unbelievably far up your ass
@bishopscore2 жыл бұрын
Aman knew all along. I just love this guy
@CarlitosPR943 жыл бұрын
Dude said "I just ran out of ideas" lmao wtf is wrong with these cheaters
@Sidionian3 жыл бұрын
I have beaten engine users before, simply flagging them. As soon as I notice perfect moves, along with the usual time delay between moves, I start playing bullet chess against them. I may end up with nothing but a king and 2 pawns left on the board, but I win. And then I offer a rematch, open up Stockfish, and beat them again by flagging them once we both hit around 20 seconds remaining. It is more fun beating engine users at their own game than having them banned. It means that they lose, even if they cheat. They usually log off immediately after this, thinking "I can't believe I lost, despite Stockfish playing my moves."
@Alchemistic883 жыл бұрын
You've tweeked your last bean brah...
@l3fthandmann3723 жыл бұрын
Maaaan Eric and Aman are like magnets to these cheaters. All for great content to come 😎👍🏾
@MiSTeRJoKe963 жыл бұрын
3:53 stockfish---> OFF, 600 rated player---> ON, It’s way too funny to see the difference from stockfish to a shitty player when they get low on time (im not insulting whoever is 600 rated, a shitty player is whoever cheat in this game, regarding his real rating)
@veni13 жыл бұрын
les be real 600 elo players are shit
@Mario-wf2br3 жыл бұрын
I like how Eric completely destroys him after the guy left the engine
@BlitzWizard943 жыл бұрын
Everyone is Loving to Expose Cheaters lately (Hikaru, Gothamchess, Eric Rosen, and now even chessbrahs)
@456death6543 жыл бұрын
“Now even chessbrahs”
@BlitzWizard943 жыл бұрын
@@456death654 yes lately everyone is in on the action lol
@MelinaHristova3 жыл бұрын
@@BlitzWizard94 He ment that ChessBrah didnt joined the trent, he was doing that in a long time.
@airforce19693 жыл бұрын
How dumb do you have to be to cheat against a GM during a livestream on Chess.com these days? You are always going to be found out...
@dennish40513 жыл бұрын
"Never played this variation before" hahaha
@Kouhaikun3 жыл бұрын
It's sad beans son didn't accuse chessbrah on FB and then earned $7k in lost battle
@quantumleap79643 жыл бұрын
Here's a piece of advice, it is obvious when you cheat. Computers think completely differently from people and it shows. Like in some positions a person would play a move that generally improves their position but a computer will play some crazy move that manages to squeak out a slight advantage after a crazy, long sequence
@lucasimonelli50383 жыл бұрын
exactly its rather obvious when someone is cheating.
@johnvuillemot48053 жыл бұрын
I've gotten away with it on my account for several months
@sandro73 жыл бұрын
1:56 free pawn Bxg7? If Bxg7 back then Rxc8+ Qxc8 Nxd6+ wins the queen. Am I missing something? Does the tactic not work or does he have smth better positionally?
@Alex-yq5xl3 жыл бұрын
"Black surpringsly manages to be winning". Nearly in all of my games i dominate,then i make i stupid mistake and loose and my engine chart looks nearly the same😂
@mrkiky3 жыл бұрын
How to know you're playing against a cheater: he's much lower rated but somehow you ask yourself why your moves aren't obvious.
@haraldkrull25493 жыл бұрын
Your house is very pretty!
@haraldkrull25493 жыл бұрын
@Spectre das ist sogar so mein Junge!
@agherisyoutube12693 жыл бұрын
Der Kapitän zur See steuert die Getränkeabteilung an.
@saniteeeh28813 жыл бұрын
Den Ausdruck "Penner" kann ich durchaus nicht ab!
@thebullybuffalo3 жыл бұрын
The Frick is all this German? I don’t speak Nazi
@sirsneedster4 ай бұрын
The John Wick music makes chess so intense lmao
@Gavinyo163 жыл бұрын
When chess grandmasters run into the same cheater and he hasn’t been caught: “Face palm”
@Alchemistic883 жыл бұрын
"I think I had you" You mean you think Stockfish had him? You had nothing to do with it...
@lex43023 жыл бұрын
they're two GMs. How are they not instantly suspicious that someone almost 1000 elo lower than them is playing so well against them?
@ejflor13132 жыл бұрын
They are instantly suspicious. How do you not instantly recognize that they are instantly suspicious?
@MatthewShute3 жыл бұрын
The mighty Morra? He's a cheat, but you can't deny he's got style. Or at least good taste in openings.
@atomicpiano3 жыл бұрын
His account wasn't even a month old lmao
@jonathantewodros25243 жыл бұрын
I think after 3:19 on Erics game, the guys stopped using the engine and was playing his own moves because it took too long to check the engine and he was under 45 sec
@DerickMasai3 жыл бұрын
This pitiful "1900" playing like 700 during time pressure and has the confidence to say "DuDE, I SuCk" "i JuSt rAn OuT oF iDeAS"
@mst9io8533 жыл бұрын
I like to think he saying "omg this engine is so slow, I can play faster than this" when he low on time and instantly get checkmated.
@aravindgundakaram18303 жыл бұрын
Big F for my man😂 He could not even win a game on stream before getting his butt hauled outa chess.com😂😂
@lorangodgodly53433 жыл бұрын
Ok so there's a lot to unpack here and just about this topic in general: First of all let me preface that I am against cheating and think that those who cheat are worse than scum. Having said that we can begin: 1. Titled players ruthlessly push this elitist and very flawed and false narrative that not having a title or a high fide rating is a sign of suspicion, not only is this empirically false (we have jimi - the world puzzle battle runner-up for example, a non-titled guy that plays speed chess like a total beast and has beaten GM Ray Robson who is top 100 chess player, or various of other players , some of which who we've seen on camera who are beasts but are non titled) but it is logically false as well, because getting titled REQUIRES playing in Fide tournaments, which requires paying the PARTICIPATION FEE, the TRAVELLING EXPENSES, FOOD and everything else in between, NOT EVERYONE CAN AFFORD THIS, IN FACT VERY FEW HAVE SUPPORTIVE HOUSEHOLDS OR HAVE MONEY THEMSELVES TO AFFORD THIS. Meaning it has to do 1. with one's financial support and income. 2. It has to do with other factors such as TRAVELLING LOGISTICS, not everyone has a ready transport or can catch a ready transport to go to a tournament, additionally most important tournaments for title norms and where high rated people play happen on RANDOM LOCATIONS WORLD WIDE. 3. It has to do with support networks, when you are alone player and have no support from anyone it's hard to manage, because you have schedules to take care of, internet tickets to look up, traffic to watch over, clothing suitable for the climate to plan, etc. And if you are all alone with no one to keep track at least to even one portion of this, then you are likely to not attend many tournaments or attend many tournaments but have you under strain that will affect your physical and mental health and hence YOUR GAME. 4. TIME! People have SCHOOL, WORK and FAMILIES to attend to, even if they wish from the bottom of their heart to have time to get high rating and title they can't without having to sacrifice some aspect of their life just for some time for chess. It is only logical to find a genius chess player who isn't titled but is a beast online who ATTENDS UNIVERSITY AND LIVES HIS LIFE AND DOESN'T SACRIFICE ALL OF HIS OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHESS. This doesn't mean they cheat, and these players can legitimately be top players in the world. 5. LIFE-CRISIS, LIFE PROBLEMS, MENTAL PROBLEMS, VICTIMS OF ABUSE, VICTIMS OF RAPE, ETC. Here we have surplus of empirical evidence. Just go to the famous chess parks of Russia and watch A HOMELESS PERSON PLAY ON A GRANDMASTER LEVEL AND BEAT GRANDMASTERS REGULARLY LIVE. This man's conditions obviously make it impossible for him to attend FIDE tournaments and he'd be kicked out of a tourney even if he paid the admission fee just for lack of hygiene and going against the dress code. Should this man make an online account where he beats chess GMs he will be falsely banned if this narrative is kept being pushed. I have countless more points to add but to keep short and to the point I think this is enough to illustrate that chess titles and high fide elo making one a good player or lacking one making one a bad is simply A PRIMITIVE OUTDATED MYTH, and if we conclude who is cheating just by how well they play but are unknowns, we are not only doing a VERY FALSE, IGNORANT AND DUMB THING but we are INVITING AN AGE OF DISCRIMINATION, TYRANNY AND CLASSISM IN CHESS THAT SHOULD NEVER BE THERE. Now that is on that, now on second point, that a person can decrease its quality of play in time scramble shouldn't be mistaken as a proof for cheating, now there is involved some intuitive understanding here where in this case we can see that the guy made too SILLY of blunders (he played like 2500 then like 600) REPEATEDLY so we can conclude he is cheating. But we cannot conclude one is cheating if one is say 2500 but makes 1800 blunders in the time scramble. Third, we have to take into account CONTEXT ALWAYS, he is playing against a popular streamer and is watched by thousands, we can understand moments of pressure causing silly blunders here or on the other hand the opposite phenomenon moments of pressure making a metaphorical diamond of a player where he plays some of his best chess just because he's watched by so many. The fourth point is SEPARATING the PSYCHOLOGY of the situation from the FACTS of the situation. Humans feel and act on emotion and impulse, we need to clear our heads and no matter how much our egos are bruised look at the provable and verifiable facts and not fall prey to speculation and logically fallacious reasoning. There are many other things surrounding this and several books can be written on the subject but this short display of the fundamental ideas is what is digestible to the public and makes the public aware.
@BrunoSa_3 жыл бұрын
So, are you saying this guy didn't cheat?
@traerooks45433 жыл бұрын
I never understand why you would cheat against a streamer. Dont cheat but this is the dumbest way to do it.
@rixantry38113 жыл бұрын
That's assuming they know the streamer in the first place. And in the case that they do know and cheat anyways, it's 10mins of fame for them.
@ValRoyD3 жыл бұрын
I’ve never understood cheating (unless there’s some monetary value in it). Out playing your opponent is one of the most satisfying feelings in the world, but cheating just so you can say, “I won,” seems pretty empty to me.
@hotshot172253 жыл бұрын
7:20 If you're above 1500 and have to think more than 2 seconds for a5 or a6, yeah, you're cheating.
@wilhelmx56762 жыл бұрын
how about white bishop takes h pawn when queen was in front of the king then rook to e1, if queen offers a check at f5 bishop just go back and white has an extra pawn
@mkhlis79942 жыл бұрын
Woah buddy, opening file for just a pawn while ur king's weak like that aint really helping, plus playing againts engine prolly gonna get mated in 10 move
@matthewd6673 жыл бұрын
What exactly was computer like in the second game? Didn't he just play a bad Stafford line then crumbled?
@BrunoSa_3 жыл бұрын
That's acttualy a common thing a cheater do. They sometimes play strange moves in the openings, sacrifice a piece for nothing, but then they start playing all top moves and win.
@hakzma35823 жыл бұрын
6:36 isnt h5 pawn is free? after rook takes bishop you go Re1 and wheen a queen?
@social79212 жыл бұрын
What is the name of the song that is playing when eric is playing?
@bonkekunene59103 жыл бұрын
Chess.com has way to many cheaters
@traerooks45433 жыл бұрын
play on lichess
@MiSTeRJoKe963 жыл бұрын
Well, don’t think that on lichess there are 100% legit players, the other day i did 2 hourly bullet in a row, first one i met a 1300 who completely destroyed me and he was using 1 second on every move, i reported him and he got banned nearly instantly, he was using a sort of autobot, probably he let the engine plays for him, second tournament i met another 900 who destroyed everyone, even 2200+/2300+, reported and banned too...
@bajuenarm17993 жыл бұрын
@@MiSTeRJoKe96 nah bro bullet stockfish impossibruh
@dominusdone50233 жыл бұрын
lichess has less cheaters because its kind of like less competitive. You could easily reach 2000 rate
@tejasbinu50253 жыл бұрын
Chess.com has a much bigger amount of players too.. so obviously more players implies more cheating....
@matthenog98263 жыл бұрын
2:47 after bxb5, what if rxe6? If bishop blocks then bxg7? Sure you've sacked a bishop but I feel like there's some comp lol
@umchoyka3 жыл бұрын
Funny too, if I'm not mistaken Aman blundered his stafford opening with Bf2. I'll have to review my Eric Rosen videos but that looks blunderish to me
@christopherpatronejr.82433 жыл бұрын
Him giving cliché responses after the game is over indicates he was using an engine, then he threw the game to cover.
@danglingondivineladders39943 жыл бұрын
told ya, cheaters just play normal moves for most of the game and check the engine for critical moments and or tactical situations thus avoiding detection.
@thirtyone86073 жыл бұрын
Although chess cheater videos are very popular, in my opinion I think they draw more attention to the act and get more cheaters into chess.
@DerangedAussieMan3 жыл бұрын
I'm of the opinion that nothing should be taboo. We should talk openly about all of the problems in our society, including cheaters in chess. Name and shame. Don't cover it up and pretend it doesn't happen.
@Simplement7243 жыл бұрын
I played this guy in your arenas, he beat me up so bad I wanted to cry
@Simplement7243 жыл бұрын
98.5% accuracy
@Idk-lk7cc3 жыл бұрын
Ayo i cant find the first song on spotify/soundcloud Any ideas?
@yusouph20022 жыл бұрын
First game doesn't look like cheater's game at all. Sure, he probably could have blundered on purpose at the end, but overall accuracy was jumping up and down, which is uncharacteristic for engine users
@jotarokujo513211 ай бұрын
false.
@anonymous-12263 жыл бұрын
What is tha title of the ending music/beat btw? I always repeat it.
@moltargaltar12193 жыл бұрын
I don’t understand why people cheat esp. if there’s no money to gain from cheating. Just cheating to make someone else feel distress, for the sake of being a troll. Unreal
@JM-vw3zb3 жыл бұрын
Wow BIG REACTION , CONFUSED MAN ON THUMBNAIL must watch wow !
@jhadesdev95763 жыл бұрын
What a clown, why do people do this. I hate cheaters, and there is a ton of them at chess.com, especially at longer time formats. I think chess.com is too permissive in their policies, I don't think they are catching most cheaters.
@hamzanasab17133 жыл бұрын
One time i made a bot that played automatically on lichess, made it so it plays very naturally (doesn't blitz out moves or think for the same amount of time and plays faster as it has less time) managed to not get banned for 2 days reached 2700 elo until i left it on for like 5 hours which is when it got banned, never ran it again as it was an experiment and i dont want to ruin people's games. It was fun to watch for a bit, I also made one that plays random moves and it reached 500 elo.
@LeslieDugger3 жыл бұрын
I don’t understand cheating in online chess, what the hell is the point??
@jakep89213 жыл бұрын
"I just ran out of ideas..."
@edumw41633 жыл бұрын
"DUDE I SUCK" well at least he got that right
@CryOfTheLyrebird Жыл бұрын
Post Hans everybody thinks everyone online is innocent now? That’s the one place where even Hans admits everyone is cheating
@RighteousRyan3 жыл бұрын
Still wondering what that music that aman uses when streaming
@ertjg Жыл бұрын
"ideas" 😂
@debasishraychawdhuri3 жыл бұрын
the second game does not look like he was cheating, he memorized the first few moves and then messed it up.
@CollectorsFix3 жыл бұрын
No, he ran low on time and had to actually play his own moves for the last 20 seconds, which is why he blundered so bad. You don’t get back rank mated at 1800.
@sandeepshetty15893 жыл бұрын
all that guy needs is a faster PC to support his engine. Anyone here in to selling those. I get 10% if you manage to swindle him in to buying one. I gave you the pitch.
@SavDerpy3 жыл бұрын
6:47 HE MISSED A MOVE! the bishop on e2 could have taken the pawn on h5 if he pushes g6 then Re1 pins the queen
@mkhlis79942 жыл бұрын
Woah relax buddy, opening file for just a pawn while ur king's weak like that aint really helping
@mescetacy3 жыл бұрын
was aman surprised his move was mate?
@umershaikh80123 жыл бұрын
Yes makes perfect sense a 2000 rated player to be destroying high rated GMs
@sushi8673 жыл бұрын
not to name any site but you can sign in from another id on chess com and download your match pgn and then upload it on the site and get engine help.
@Bryan-uu3fu3 жыл бұрын
@chessbrah the hashtag is misspelled for Aman
@chessbrah3 жыл бұрын
thanks! fixed- EH
@butzelmann51283 жыл бұрын
Songname when Eric plays? Cant find Martin Karma Asencion