Eric and Aman run into the SAME cheater!

[@chessbrah]

Make sure to check out chessbrahstore.com for our merch! We now have joggers in stock, which can offer +200 ELO without need for an engine

[@TheSoulBlossom]

I want those joggers!

[@filipkorosec102]

What about JORTS?!

[@theTeflonDon1]

Lmao!

[@SlaveofRighteousness2749]

Where did the joggers go

[@mislavivkovic9996]

Why? So if u lost they get banned 83 percent is not 98 percent

[@BobfromSydney]

To paraphrase a quote about a plagiarised essay: "I found your Chess games to be both good and original. Unfortunately the moves that were good were not original and the moves that were original were not good."

[@AmineMuhammad-d3s]

ass quote tbh

[@UnionRing]

"I just ran out of ideas" You didn't have any

[@starboiklem8381]

He ran of ouf fishes

[@DrkMike]

His one and only idea was to cheat and then it didn't work.

[@naseempopov9013]

@@starboiklem8381 lol

[@chazmichels4280]

More like "oh crap, they think I'm cheating so I better throw the game at the end and say 'I ran out of ideas'." Lmao smh

[@mikes1984]

he doesnt have any because he ran out

[@jvplaster]

Bruh I just love their contrasting personalities... Aman tries to flag the cheaters while Eric tries to outthink stockfish

[@pairot01]

They didn't think he was cheating during the game.

[@jvplaster]

@@pairot01 I meant generally btw, in older videos

[@user-420i]

Aman wins against bots in bullet and hyperbullet, it's crazy how he moves so fast

[@jvplaster]

@@user-420i ikr like bruh imagine getting flagged even after using engine, Aman is a beast when it comes to dirty tactics

[@MrVannspreder]

@Utsav Joshi Is Stockfish really using neural networks now? For a long time they didn't.

[@kozatas]

He lost on purpose and hoped for a commend like "wow you play so strong for a 1900". He tried to start a conversation on both games.

[@erdling3132]

His real rating was probably 300 lmao, every move he did on his own was a blunder

[@hammurabitheawesome674]

Nah, at least in the second game he played some Stafford theory, engines normally don't suggest the h4 and ng4 moves because they are not actually that good if the other player plays properly.

[@dimitrifrog7845]

@@hammurabitheawesome674 so he knows how to use google, amazing.

[@hammurabitheawesome674]

@@dimitrifrog7845 Lol im not praising him or anything I'm just saying that your average 300 probably wouldn't know that.

[@advertisingmenta5993]

@@hammurabitheawesome674 your average whatever can still watch rosen knowing theory doesnt make shit moves better

[@pkermen]

@@hammurabitheawesome674 im a 350, can confirm. know fuckall about anything

[@stevenpaul7114]

Bean_tweak: "I can take it on my own from here..."

[@foldvarigabor7229]

This guy playing 3 minute with an engine and just blundering when his time gets low. Jeez what a smooth brain move.

[@60xFPS]

the brahs got their beans tweaked

[@rewrittenbytes1616]

222 likes no comments

[@raghav3857]

@@rewrittenbytes1616 we had to do something bout that oh wait we did

[@jordanferta8212]

333 likes 2 comments

[@rewrittenbytes1616]

@@raghav3857 ayeee

[@shayanxyz]

Let me contribute

[@kingoverlorder2094]

Lmao both Eric and aman were going for different playstyles against stockfish

[@topgunjoeicdbko]

Not really

[@pancakes9648]

Both ended up in backrank mate

[@shinetalent]

Bean_tweak: Okay, It seems I got him good already, dont need to cheat using engine anymore. *next move, blunders rook*

[@turtlefeesh]

and back rank mate 😂

[@thewayihandleit]

It must be so obvious to GM's when they play against a cheater... that dude was not subtle like he thought he was

[@jamesknapp64]

I mean there could be gambit lines that people know like in the Mora that get them in a winning position then blunder the middle and endgames. The position Eric had in the middle game all but one of the guys moves I were moves I was thinking of making, of course I made the same blunders, idk what that says about me or the cheater. Amans game looked way more like a stockfish user with the Knight sac for activity was someone no one on that dudes level would do. Then they followed it up with constant pressure until the end when they stopped using it.

[@platonfoucault1087]

To get a player 1000Elo above you sweating when he is actually playing seriously is just impossible without cheating. Miracles do not happen in chess, luck does not make for such a big part of the game.

[@quazzydiscman]

@@jamesknapp64 stop cheating bro

[@user-420i]

As a 1900 i can relate that id be completely crushed by Eric even with 5 minutes against 1

[@thewayihandleit]

yeah thats the MO of cheaters, to play those gambit/off beat lines where there's inaccuracies to try and throw off anti cheating software but like you say some of the moves he played would never be played by a 1900. Also the typical way to beat a cheater is just flagging them and you can see how the quality of the moves instantly drops when there's time pressure. Eric seems to try and out think the cheater though LOL

[@SquibbyJ]

Imagine getting a really clean position with a clear unifying idea and then claiming you ran out of ideas

[@yoloswaggins2161]

"i think i had you" Why do cheaters always say stuff like this.

[@Yakushii]

It's so stupid. They lose because they get low on time, and have to play for themselves, then it's always "oh I choked, but I had you though, right?" I swear, it says a lot about the mentality of someone who cheats, and then proceeds to try and get praise for something they didn't do.

[@manhetna6350]

Thats alibi, for not cheating

[@patstaysuckafreeboss8006]

@@Yakushii It's called trolling. Not exactly a hard thing to understand lol

[@silverzelricc8083]

coz they need to compensate for having supa smol pee pee. with his moves on the later half of both the games, he's prolly only rated about 1100

[@mhqa_]

Its like they are trying to make people believe that they were not cheating which is stupid in my opinion

[@kevinreyeskev2475]

Even the way he messages sounds like a 900 😂

[@orangenasa]

Good job to the big chess creators noticing that people want to see cheater content

[@biobagholder8081]

i want players i can relate to is that so hard

[@stealthyfang3660]

This probably only makes cheating against them worse tbh

[@dinahassan3857]

You are smart

[@starboiklem8381]

Yes, nothing better than watching gms play against the greatest chess player of all time without knowing it 😛

[@emmahams3174]

Yah....if am playing a gm...of course I would use some engine help...do I look sun....hahahah🤣

[@reinsaxony4623]

Wtf the guy was wrecking him at 1900 and then blundered everything lmao.

[@none8680]

"I just ran out of ideas" Dude you never had one

[@alexsehe]

When you are so bad at chess that you can’t understand what the engine is doing. Then you stop using the engine and you can’t see the pin the engine had effortlessly created on the board. 🤣🤣🤣

[@emptyarms6113]

“I think I had you” lmfao

[@wsemenske]

"It doesn't matter if you win by a Pawn or a Queen, winning's winning"

[@Clementine416]

@@wsemenske i get that reference ahah good one

[@emptyarms6113]

@Onyx ?

[@seanbailey8545]

FeelsBadMan a Canadian cheating against his homies...

[@quazzydiscman]

4real... That never happens in other countries 🙄🙄🙄

[@anonnnnnnnnnnnn]

glory to bosnia

[@aravind2966]

@@quazzydiscman *India* Edit:I'm indian btw

[@aburriiiiiiiiiiido]

You can put a Canadian flag on chess. com despite being from another country

[@MrFreeGman]

The dude should run for office

[@teenspirit1]

aman can actually recognize stockfish and get it stale to win on time. He's pretty amazing.

[@talchemy9491]

You can really tell when he stops using the engine. Instantly blunders the house

[@hellstormangel]

I mean if you're going to cheat against 2 gms on stream, then at least win.

[@ammster1234]

I think he plays trappy openings and follows the engine lines, then when he gets low on time he plays on his own and thats when he blunders the game

[@frederikzinn5427]

@@ammster1234 That would not be cheating i think. That is opening prep.

[@bobbysnobby]

@@ammster1234 or he threw to try and confuse people away from identifying him as cheating

[@dmythica]

@@frederikzinn5427 nah, he plays an opening, which is opening prep, then let's the engine decide the rest of his moves until he gets low on time. Then makes shit moves.

[@alessandrofinocchi5608]

@@dmythica He had almost a minute against Eric. How is that "low on time"?

[@Dave__AC]

Pooja's brother?

[@Alex-ck5pz]

Teacher)

[@troyootipep5]

Yes but more worse lol

[@w451-qx3kx]

sweet pooja ;(

[@MatsMatsuo]

perhaps, the smooth brain they two have might be a genetic correlation

[@KevinLuWX]

Plays at 2500+ level for 30 moves, then ELO suddenly drops by 1500 points when time drops below 30 seconds

[@Flame-zn7jp]

Rude to 1000s haha. He played much worse.

[@warrenz597]

5:12 I can almost see buddy loading the pieces onto the analysis board

[@NatalieDemary]

Plays like an engine, messages like a bot, blunders like a 16th seed POGchamp

[@YeaaaboiAlwin]

HE LITERALLY set up that pin on the king early in the game, and couldn't "see" it when it was the most obvious lol. "I just ran out of ideas..." Sure buddy.

[@lexevo]

Truly, sincerely, actually, honestly, seriously, clearly, certainly, genuinely all words that can be used instead of literally. Might as well be a male using air quotes. If you’re 12 or younger or English is your second language, I apologize. Then it’s fine.

[@buyukyollarnhaydudu823]

@@lexevo english is my second language . What is wrong with using "literally" ?

[@singingtrains5468]

@@buyukyollarnhaydudu823 Look up the definition. This is like the opposite scenario of when you should be using litterally.

[@YeaaaboiAlwin]

@@lexevo No. Truly, sincerely, honestly, certainly, and genuinely wouldn't fit as well in this context.

[@andrewferguson6901]

Are you all fucking high? He LITERALLY used the word exactly the way it's defined. Get this pedantic bullshit out of here.

[@talchemy9491]

Imagine cheating and still losing both games 😅

[@VanguardX]

cheaters always get destroyed in endgame because stockfish needs ~3 seconds to calculate a move. So they wind up just bludering everything.

[@adlex1212]

​@@VanguardX I don't think stockfish takes that long, it's more likely the player has to make all the moves on a second board and that takes time.

[@Jartran72]

@@VanguardX Nah, looking at the move and copying the move is what screws them up

[@buddybuythis3889]

Everyone is on a Stafford vibe. Thanks Eric Rosen.

[@dcorzo]

3 months after your comments and I'm still playing the Stafford gambit. it hardly ever works anymore

[@Jartran72]

The Stafford Gambit is really losing if you just remember a couple prep moves. Like you have to play from more than 1.0 difference after the opening. If you are anywhere above 1500 this will have a hard time working.

[@theTeflonDon1]

You gotta give him some credit for a pretty solid name

[@TheNameOfJesus]

This is why lawyers ask you never to take the witness stand. Because most of the people in this thread conclude he was guilty on the basis of his own words.

[@thetrickster42]

Nope, it’s because the last shot of the video shows he got banned from Chess.com for cheating

[@Cardtrix77]

Can’t believe there’s actually people who are as dumb as a sack of rocks. If you can’t tell when someone’s a blatant cheater, your head is unbelievably far up your ass

[@ellyazar6764]

Hahaha classic cheaters. He wanted an attention. Played like super computer moves then blundered n be like “owow we im suckk...wow we im terrible..” lmaooo 😂😂😂😂 glad he got banned.

[@TH-dg2mm]

I'm from Toronto and when the city reopens I really need Coda to do a weirdass Nicole Moudaber chess show at like 10am on a Wednesday.

[@CarlitosPR94]

Dude said "I just ran out of ideas" lmao wtf is wrong with these cheaters

[@Mario-wf2br]

I like how Eric completely destroys him after the guy left the engine

[@bishopscore]

Aman knew all along. I just love this guy

[@DerickMasai]

This pitiful "1900" playing like 700 during time pressure and has the confidence to say "DuDE, I SuCk" "i JuSt rAn OuT oF iDeAS"

[@CALIXZACHARY]

Funning thing about chess.com is that when chess youtubers or popular GMs report an account they immediately take action, when common people nevermind.😅...i reported someone having 97 to 98 accuracies in 10 games with 1600 rating never get banned. thats why lichess is better because they immediately take action regardless who reported popular or not

[@MiSTeRJoKe96]

3:53 stockfish---> OFF, 600 rated player---> ON, It’s way too funny to see the difference from stockfish to a shitty player when they get low on time (im not insulting whoever is 600 rated, a shitty player is whoever cheat in this game, regarding his real rating)

[@veni1]

les be real 600 elo players are shit

[@dennish4051]

"Never played this variation before" hahaha

[@Alchemistic88]

You've tweeked your last bean brah...

[@BenKuyt64]

Eric: Oh, man, he almost got me, blundered in the end, unlucky. Aman: Woah, what the fuck is this guy doing with his insane lines? Two completely different mentalities and I fucking love both.

[@mrkiky]

How to know you're playing against a cheater: he's much lower rated but somehow you ask yourself why your moves aren't obvious.

[@mst9io853]

I like to think he saying "omg this engine is so slow, I can play faster than this" when he low on time and instantly get checkmated.

[@l3fthandmann372]

Maaaan Eric and Aman are like magnets to these cheaters. All for great content to come 😎👍🏾

[@lex4302]

they're two GMs. How are they not instantly suspicious that someone almost 1000 elo lower than them is playing so well against them?

[@ejflor1313]

They are instantly suspicious. How do you not instantly recognize that they are instantly suspicious?

[@edumw4163]

"DUDE I SUCK" well at least he got that right

[@Sidionian]

I have beaten engine users before, simply flagging them. As soon as I notice perfect moves, along with the usual time delay between moves, I start playing bullet chess against them. I may end up with nothing but a king and 2 pawns left on the board, but I win. And then I offer a rematch, open up Stockfish, and beat them again by flagging them once we both hit around 20 seconds remaining. It is more fun beating engine users at their own game than having them banned. It means that they lose, even if they cheat. They usually log off immediately after this, thinking "I can't believe I lost, despite Stockfish playing my moves."

[@Gavinyo16]

When chess grandmasters run into the same cheater and he hasn’t been caught: “Face palm”

[@jakep8921]

"I just ran out of ideas..."

[@Alchemistic88]

"I think I had you" You mean you think Stockfish had him? You had nothing to do with it...

[@sandro7]

1:56 free pawn Bxg7? If Bxg7 back then Rxc8+ Qxc8 Nxd6+ wins the queen. Am I missing something? Does the tactic not work or does he have smth better positionally?

[@jonathantewodros2524]

I think after 3:19 on Erics game, the guys stopped using the engine and was playing his own moves because it took too long to check the engine and he was under 45 sec

[@Kouhaikun]

It's sad beans son didn't accuse chessbrah on FB and then earned $7k in lost battle

[@NMBrayanAmaya]

Everyone is Loving to Expose Cheaters lately (Hikaru, Gothamchess, Eric Rosen, and now even chessbrahs)

[@456death654]

“Now even chessbrahs”

[@NMBrayanAmaya]

@@456death654 yes lately everyone is in on the action lol

[@MelinaHristova]

@@NMBrayanAmaya He ment that ChessBrah didnt joined the trent, he was doing that in a long time.

[@Creesekush]

His account wasn't even a month old lmao

[@airforce1969]

How dumb do you have to be to cheat against a GM during a livestream on Chess.com these days? You are always going to be found out...

[@quantumleap7964]

Here's a piece of advice, it is obvious when you cheat. Computers think completely differently from people and it shows. Like in some positions a person would play a move that generally improves their position but a computer will play some crazy move that manages to squeak out a slight advantage after a crazy, long sequence

[@lucasimonelli5038]

exactly its rather obvious when someone is cheating.

[@HenryMcCraken4]

I've gotten away with it on my account for several months

[@sirsneedster]

The John Wick music makes chess so intense lmao

[@lorangodgodly5343]

Ok so there's a lot to unpack here and just about this topic in general: First of all let me preface that I am against cheating and think that those who cheat are worse than scum. Having said that we can begin: 1. Titled players ruthlessly push this elitist and very flawed and false narrative that not having a title or a high fide rating is a sign of suspicion, not only is this empirically false (we have jimi - the world puzzle battle runner-up for example, a non-titled guy that plays speed chess like a total beast and has beaten GM Ray Robson who is top 100 chess player, or various of other players , some of which who we've seen on camera who are beasts but are non titled) but it is logically false as well, because getting titled REQUIRES playing in Fide tournaments, which requires paying the PARTICIPATION FEE, the TRAVELLING EXPENSES, FOOD and everything else in between, NOT EVERYONE CAN AFFORD THIS, IN FACT VERY FEW HAVE SUPPORTIVE HOUSEHOLDS OR HAVE MONEY THEMSELVES TO AFFORD THIS. Meaning it has to do 1. with one's financial support and income. 2. It has to do with other factors such as TRAVELLING LOGISTICS, not everyone has a ready transport or can catch a ready transport to go to a tournament, additionally most important tournaments for title norms and where high rated people play happen on RANDOM LOCATIONS WORLD WIDE. 3. It has to do with support networks, when you are alone player and have no support from anyone it's hard to manage, because you have schedules to take care of, internet tickets to look up, traffic to watch over, clothing suitable for the climate to plan, etc. And if you are all alone with no one to keep track at least to even one portion of this, then you are likely to not attend many tournaments or attend many tournaments but have you under strain that will affect your physical and mental health and hence YOUR GAME. 4. TIME! People have SCHOOL, WORK and FAMILIES to attend to, even if they wish from the bottom of their heart to have time to get high rating and title they can't without having to sacrifice some aspect of their life just for some time for chess. It is only logical to find a genius chess player who isn't titled but is a beast online who ATTENDS UNIVERSITY AND LIVES HIS LIFE AND DOESN'T SACRIFICE ALL OF HIS OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHESS. This doesn't mean they cheat, and these players can legitimately be top players in the world. 5. LIFE-CRISIS, LIFE PROBLEMS, MENTAL PROBLEMS, VICTIMS OF ABUSE, VICTIMS OF RAPE, ETC. Here we have surplus of empirical evidence. Just go to the famous chess parks of Russia and watch A HOMELESS PERSON PLAY ON A GRANDMASTER LEVEL AND BEAT GRANDMASTERS REGULARLY LIVE. This man's conditions obviously make it impossible for him to attend FIDE tournaments and he'd be kicked out of a tourney even if he paid the admission fee just for lack of hygiene and going against the dress code. Should this man make an online account where he beats chess GMs he will be falsely banned if this narrative is kept being pushed. I have countless more points to add but to keep short and to the point I think this is enough to illustrate that chess titles and high fide elo making one a good player or lacking one making one a bad is simply A PRIMITIVE OUTDATED MYTH, and if we conclude who is cheating just by how well they play but are unknowns, we are not only doing a VERY FALSE, IGNORANT AND DUMB THING but we are INVITING AN AGE OF DISCRIMINATION, TYRANNY AND CLASSISM IN CHESS THAT SHOULD NEVER BE THERE. Now that is on that, now on second point, that a person can decrease its quality of play in time scramble shouldn't be mistaken as a proof for cheating, now there is involved some intuitive understanding here where in this case we can see that the guy made too SILLY of blunders (he played like 2500 then like 600) REPEATEDLY so we can conclude he is cheating. But we cannot conclude one is cheating if one is say 2500 but makes 1800 blunders in the time scramble. Third, we have to take into account CONTEXT ALWAYS, he is playing against a popular streamer and is watched by thousands, we can understand moments of pressure causing silly blunders here or on the other hand the opposite phenomenon moments of pressure making a metaphorical diamond of a player where he plays some of his best chess just because he's watched by so many. The fourth point is SEPARATING the PSYCHOLOGY of the situation from the FACTS of the situation. Humans feel and act on emotion and impulse, we need to clear our heads and no matter how much our egos are bruised look at the provable and verifiable facts and not fall prey to speculation and logically fallacious reasoning. There are many other things surrounding this and several books can be written on the subject but this short display of the fundamental ideas is what is digestible to the public and makes the public aware.

[@BrunoSa_]

So, are you saying this guy didn't cheat?

[@haraldkrull2549]

Your house is very pretty!

[@haraldkrull2549]

@Spectre das ist sogar so mein Junge!

[@agherisyoutube1269]

Der Kapitän zur See steuert die Getränkeabteilung an.

[@saniteeeh2881]

Den Ausdruck "Penner" kann ich durchaus nicht ab!

[@thebullybuffalo]

The Frick is all this German? I don’t speak Nazi

[@christopherpatronejr.8243]

Him giving cliché responses after the game is over indicates he was using an engine, then he threw the game to cover.

[@Simplement724]

I played this guy in your arenas, he beat me up so bad I wanted to cry

[@Simplement724]

98.5% accuracy

[@christopher19894]

Flick the bean away.

[@Alex-yq5xl]

"Black surpringsly manages to be winning". Nearly in all of my games i dominate,then i make i stupid mistake and loose and my engine chart looks nearly the same😂

[@Bladavia]

"Ooops I did it again"

[@hotshot17225]

7:20 If you're above 1500 and have to think more than 2 seconds for a5 or a6, yeah, you're cheating.

[@moltargaltar1219]

I don’t understand why people cheat esp. if there’s no money to gain from cheating. Just cheating to make someone else feel distress, for the sake of being a troll. Unreal

[@clapshotxd3049]

LOL Aman and Eric be finding cheaters

[@MatthewShute]

The mighty Morra? He's a cheat, but you can't deny he's got style. Or at least good taste in openings.

[@social7921]

What is the name of the song that is playing when eric is playing?

[@aravindgundakaram1830]

Big F for my man😂 He could not even win a game on stream before getting his butt hauled outa chess.com😂😂

[@debasishraychawdhuri]

the second game does not look like he was cheating, he memorized the first few moves and then messed it up.

[@CollectorsFix]

No, he ran low on time and had to actually play his own moves for the last 20 seconds, which is why he blundered so bad. You don’t get back rank mated at 1800.

[@DenizCDemir]

When you are so low that you can't even cheat properly

[@FrancisMacomber1936]

was aman surprised his move was mate?

[@bonkekunene5910]

Chess.com has way to many cheaters

[@traerooks4543]

play on lichess

[@MiSTeRJoKe96]

Well, don’t think that on lichess there are 100% legit players, the other day i did 2 hourly bullet in a row, first one i met a 1300 who completely destroyed me and he was using 1 second on every move, i reported him and he got banned nearly instantly, he was using a sort of autobot, probably he let the engine plays for him, second tournament i met another 900 who destroyed everyone, even 2200+/2300+, reported and banned too...

[@bajuenarm1799]

@@MiSTeRJoKe96 nah bro bullet stockfish impossibruh

[@dominusdone5023]

lichess has less cheaters because its kind of like less competitive. You could easily reach 2000 rate

[@tejasbinu5025]

Chess.com has a much bigger amount of players too.. so obviously more players implies more cheating....

[@thirtyone8607]

Although chess cheater videos are very popular, in my opinion I think they draw more attention to the act and get more cheaters into chess.

[@DerangedAussieMan]

I'm of the opinion that nothing should be taboo. We should talk openly about all of the problems in our society, including cheaters in chess. Name and shame. Don't cover it up and pretend it doesn't happen.

[@matthewd667]

What exactly was computer like in the second game? Didn't he just play a bad Stafford line then crumbled?

[@BrunoSa_]

That's acttualy a common thing a cheater do. They sometimes play strange moves in the openings, sacrifice a piece for nothing, but then they start playing all top moves and win.

[@traerooks4543]

I never understand why you would cheat against a streamer. Dont cheat but this is the dumbest way to do it.

[@rixantry3811]

That's assuming they know the streamer in the first place. And in the case that they do know and cheat anyways, it's 10mins of fame for them.

[@ValRoyD]

I’ve never understood cheating (unless there’s some monetary value in it). Out playing your opponent is one of the most satisfying feelings in the world, but cheating just so you can say, “I won,” seems pretty empty to me.

[@hakzma3582]

6:36 isnt h5 pawn is free? after rook takes bishop you go Re1 and wheen a queen?

[@danglingondivineladders3994]

told ya, cheaters just play normal moves for most of the game and check the engine for critical moments and or tactical situations thus avoiding detection.

[@tfustmuls826]

People who cheat especially against gm to lie to themselves are just low lifes, seriously, just... stupid

[@ertjg]

"ideas" 😂

[@matthenog9826]

2:47 after bxb5, what if rxe6? If bishop blocks then bxg7? Sure you've sacked a bishop but I feel like there's some comp lol

[@LeslieDugger]

I don’t understand cheating in online chess, what the hell is the point??

[@Idk-lk7cc]

Ayo i cant find the first song on spotify/soundcloud Any ideas?

[@anonymous-1226]

What is tha title of the ending music/beat btw? I always repeat it.

[@pk-fi1ok]

a stockfish operator failed

[@user-420i]

we want the cheater who made eric tilted the whole arena kings after the game

[@RighteousRyan]

Still wondering what that music that aman uses when streaming

[@Bryan-uu3fu]

@chessbrah the hashtag is misspelled for Aman

[@chessbrah]

thanks! fixed- EH

[@umchoyka]

Funny too, if I'm not mistaken Aman blundered his stafford opening with Bf2. I'll have to review my Eric Rosen videos but that looks blunderish to me

[@JM-vw3zb]

Wow BIG REACTION , CONFUSED MAN ON THUMBNAIL must watch wow !

[@eatherquake8107]

In all of cheats there's a rhythm

[@umershaikh8012]

Yes makes perfect sense a 2000 rated player to be destroying high rated GMs

[@troyootipep5]

Bruh I wonder how many ratings I lost for unknowingly matched with a cheater

[@asetr3w45]

Many

[@pairot01]

You get refunded after they get caught. So unless you got a message saying so, you haven't played against cheaters.

[@troyootipep5]

@@pairot01 I actually did got refunded a bunch of times lmao

[@pairot01]

@@troyootipep5 then you should know exactly how many rating point you had lost :)

[@hishamamir8186]

Actually once i got awarded like 200 plus points i dunnoe why. Then i started losing alot cuz i clearly dun belong in that level yet. And now i sit comfortably back at my level again

[@Dortchskii]

Beat twice and then banned

[@wilhelmx5676]

how about white bishop takes h pawn when queen was in front of the king then rook to e1, if queen offers a check at f5 bishop just go back and white has an extra pawn

[@mkhlis7994]

Woah buddy, opening file for just a pawn while ur king's weak like that aint really helping, plus playing againts engine prolly gonna get mated in 10 move