Three Most Convenient Games EVER

Рет қаралды 24,009

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 112

@thevagabond3181 Ай бұрын

You keep lying that the win rate has always been 100%. Please edit it to reflect the truth: 'Win rate has always been 100% or higher'.

@Moon4Tzuyu Ай бұрын

Lol, you had me in the first half...

@dawidwojacki5049 Ай бұрын

Winrate is below 100% because Simp has already lost a couple of games, but he can't do maths

@tripweed Ай бұрын

@@dawidwojacki5049 Simp is Asian, I am fairly sure he knows how math works.

@kronorave4444 Ай бұрын

@@dawidwojacki5049 How dare you doubt an Asian in math

@BryndanMeyerholtTheRealDeal Ай бұрын

@@dawidwojacki5049 And there is that one video where he won one and lost two games, but multiplied -100 percent twice, which is completely not how win rates work…

@nikk-named Ай бұрын

"that blunders the entire game" lmao xD

@SpongesonicPictures Ай бұрын

But Simp 100%+100%+100%=300% win rate

@daotrongkhanh1205 Ай бұрын

100% * 100% * 100% = 100%

@NWRIBronco6 Ай бұрын

@@daotrongkhanh1205 Or is it 1000000%³ ?

@Saturlen Ай бұрын

@@NWRIBronco6 100% is 1, 1^3 is still 1

@Galinaceo0 Ай бұрын

@@Saturlen but %=0.01 so %³=0.000001

@mr.d8747 Ай бұрын

@@Galinaceo0 *Exactly. And since 1%³ = 0.000001, that means 1000000%³ = 1.*

@joz534 Ай бұрын

at this point I want Simp to loose 3 games in a video just so he can teach us how that maths into 100% winrate.

@Essutos Ай бұрын

[(-1)+(-1)]×(-1) is 1 in Boolean algebra

@ecMathGeek Ай бұрын

A) (-1) ^ [ (-1) + (-1) ] B) [ (-1) * (-1) ] ^ (-1) C) (-1) ^ [ (-1) - (-1) ] D) [ (-1) * (-1) + (-1) ] ! E) { [ (-1) - (-1) ] * (-1) } ! F) (-1) - (-1) - (-1)

@MrTrainman96 Ай бұрын

I wonder if that bishop capture in the first game was because the opponent didn't realize the left to right rule is reversed from his perspective so he thought you couldn't recapture

@BlizzardofDreams Ай бұрын

This is a really good point. Maybe the rule should be rephrased to describe it by “ascending files”, or something similar?

@hodayfa000h 28 күн бұрын

The drawback applies from your opponent's perspective, doesn't need a brain, your opponent wouldn't just think of it from your own perspective, plus it is obviously the right of the opponent's king so the opponent themselves

@shapular Ай бұрын

This series where he reveals his drawback would be so much easier if he didn't reveal his drawback smh

@rockyman2685 Ай бұрын

Honestly, revealing the drawback is based. It was only boring when you didn't count the games where the oppoment was a chad and also revealed their drawback.

@Chomta Ай бұрын

Definitely paid actors

@sleeper6548 Ай бұрын

No, as the actor, I am not getting paid, we are unpaid actors instead Simp, if you are seeing this, I promise I wont reveal our secret if you let my family go

@Chomta Ай бұрын

@@sleeper6548 sad news your family is no more with simp infact no more with the world. So be careful before revealing yourself next especially if it's related to simp

@sleeper6548 Ай бұрын

@@Chomta [Auto Generated Comment In Case Of Emergency] If you are reading this, this means Simp has finally pulled the trigger, but before I go, I'd like to say Simp is a fraud /j

@Ottonymos Ай бұрын

Complaining about people complaining about your testosterone? That's not very testosterone.

@DecisionsAreQuestionable Ай бұрын

i believed his unlack of testosterone, i feel so dejected

@hiitsnicetomeetyou Ай бұрын

We must remember not to question Simp's math, he's never been wrong and he would never contradict himself just to get us to comment and get engagement... Right?

@RaceBandit Ай бұрын

It's clearly a ploy to get us to discuss his drug intake.

@someaccount5200 Ай бұрын

He doesn't know how to count to 5

@ronk5186 Ай бұрын

3/3 opponents revealed this video. Radiating testosterone

@marquisdan7659 Ай бұрын

"That blunders the entire game" - My opponent every time I move a piece

@Meni_Rosenfeld Ай бұрын

You won all games out of 3. All=1 (All for one and one for all) so it's 1/3, or 33.33% winrate. Trust me, I'm a mathematician.

@Psycho250785 Ай бұрын

But are you Asian though?

@AM-yk5yd Ай бұрын

Man, ad revenue must be so massive you can hire entire horde of paid actors 😃

@B0NES48 Ай бұрын

100 rated chess but you have to checkmate by castling

@VitaEmerald324 Ай бұрын

Simplifier is probably the most exploitable drawback

@parleyeon7951 Ай бұрын

You know it would be really funny if after all that talk about testosterone and so on, it turned out that Simp is actually a woman

@mous3kteer Ай бұрын

Simp addressed that rumor in a previous video and explicitly said they're not a woman, so unless Simp just lied, that's unfortunately not the case. It was still absolutely my favorite theory about this channel for a while, though!

@wtfisthisthing Ай бұрын

volunteering actors

@lewisirwin5363 Ай бұрын

I know the drawbacks play havoc with the usual rules, but that is STILL the first time I have ever seen a King actually be taken!

@sewer56lol Ай бұрын

Anyone else notice Simp blundered the first game on move 1? The opponent could have moved Pawn forward, Queen or Bishop Bottom Left, Capture Pawn, Capture King. There were just enough moves. Because Simp had to always move 1 right, he could not respond to pieces on the left in any way, hence free king capture. Edit: I misinterpreted the challenge as '1 Square to the right' however forced checkmate is still possible.

@sacielo Ай бұрын

MATHS: you should play at 2233, 2267 and 2300

@Xaiclun Ай бұрын

Huh, shouldn't it be 300% Win-Rate?

@EnverHalilHoxha1917 Ай бұрын

Why he reveal challenge I am complain

@n0150 Ай бұрын

t e s t o s t e r o n e

@trentonrandall9733 Ай бұрын

He's not a coward

@SquashDemon Ай бұрын

so much testosterone that he's been playing drawback chess for years when it's not even one year old.

@derAlphabet Ай бұрын

Good morning everyone, we're back at 'Good morning everyone'.

@Tdvtdvtdv Ай бұрын

Bro changed the title and thought we wouldn't notice

@littleladlarry Ай бұрын

Another 100% in the bag ggs

@lonelyPorterCH Ай бұрын

Revealing drawback sure spices things up, because most times you can abuse it somehow^^

@aughlnal7333 Ай бұрын

I think stalemate is normally impossible in this variant since you can move you king into a check. So this scenario is only possible with certain drawbacks, so it is always a win. EDIT: It is possible if you box the king in with protected pieces that not attack the king, I guess it would still be a win

@Ze_eT Ай бұрын

I assume with "protected pieces" you mean pieces you are not allowed to move to because of the rules? Yes, that would be a win via drawback. Being forced to break the rules of your drawback is an instant loss, and that includes if you are forced to violate your drawback because your drawback took away all legal moves.

@kussykussy1646 Ай бұрын

I was worried that in 2nd game Simp would autoabort game

@emmeeemm Ай бұрын

Game 1: Literally cannot lose the game if you lose a piece on the h-file and another piece on any adjacent square, and then walk your King all the way over there. You could shuffle back and forth between two Haunted squares forever. Very convenient set of opponents. All true Chads who great at math and who reveal their drawbacks to keep things fair.

@pepejuanmolaman889 Ай бұрын

You can get checkmated even if you are on a haunted square right?

@emmeeemm Ай бұрын

@@pepejuanmolaman889 In all technicality, sure. But in Drawback Chess, you must actually capture the King to win the game. Just trapping the King isn't good enough here. So, a "checkmate" position has no value if the target king can just shuffle back and forth between a couple of haunted squares, never emerging onto squares where it could be captured.

@iczyg Ай бұрын

Isnt game 1 lost if the opponent stuck around? Knight g4 and white cant do anything If defend mid pawn with d3, queen takes on h4 with check, and white has nothing to block, and after moving the king, black can just move next to the king and white cant take back.

@toms75 Ай бұрын

Isn't the maximum rating you can put in the Welcome! box 2000? For higher rating games you might need to build up rating on the same account.

@kipu44 Ай бұрын

I keep forgetting that you use TTS. You're really good at it. 👍

@wuddii Ай бұрын

8:01I thought king has a higher value than bishops

@pepebeezon772 Ай бұрын

Wow, there's no stalemate in drawback chess? Edit : nvm, simp talks about it immediately afterward

@yretgggjj9427 Ай бұрын

it's because.the objective is to take the king, not checkmate

@batlrar Ай бұрын

Was that really a forced move at the end of the last game? Couldn't they have taken the bishop with the king, or does the site consider a king to be of lesser value than a bishop?

@BaconJake14 Ай бұрын

I had to reread that drawback a few times cuz i thought the same. It is worded very unintuitively but "capture a piece with a piece of equal or lesser value" means the capturing piece needs to be the same or smaller than the captured piece if possible. So yes that bishop capture was forced, as king takes bishop would be capturing a piece with a piece of greater value

@j.h.6835 Ай бұрын

They had to capture a piece WITH a piece of equal or lesser value if they could. It was possible for them to capture a bishop with a bishop, so they couldn't capture one with a king, precisely because king has greater value.

@Moleoflands Ай бұрын

Yes, King is 3.5 - although on here I believe it is the most valuable piece

@davidtitanium22 Ай бұрын

You should really pay your actors

@Feuerteufel99 Ай бұрын

In the last game, when you value the king with 3,5 then couldnt he just take with king?

@robertkowallek2495 Ай бұрын

Kings have infinite value in drawback chess, but even if it were 3.5, he still couldn't take the bishop because the bishop has a lower value (3) than the king.

@NumenEloha Ай бұрын

I have a doubt about the second game, the drawback of the oponent. In late game if they go to a stalemate position, in normal drawback chess the king have to move and then be captured and lose. But with this drawback he can't move his king, so is a real stalemate drawback? Or is a lose cause he can't move anything?

@NumenEloha Ай бұрын

5:53 ok that answer the question xD

@Whatdoiputhere-m4m Ай бұрын

They are NOT PAID actors

@Psycho250785 Ай бұрын

Win rate - 300%!

@TS6815 Ай бұрын

I miss I'M BETTER THAN MY VIEWERS

@flutiyama Ай бұрын

UHM, EXCUSE ME, didn't you mean THREE HUNDRED PERCENT win rate instead?

@ieaatclams Ай бұрын

Testosterone complaint

@kaiserruhsam Ай бұрын

paid

@PokeKippster Ай бұрын

In that last game can't you just go 1.e4 d5 2. exd5 c6 3. dxc6 Qd6 4. cxb7 Qe7+ 5. bx... Qxe1?

@RupertAndCheese Ай бұрын

Is the bishop higher value than the king?

@-Shiro_ Ай бұрын

It isn't, King in Drawback website is 3.5, bishop is 3.0; so bishop is lesser value. I also have no clue why the opponent decided to take Simp's white bishop and ignore the black bishop threat... Must be racist /s

@Ze_eT Ай бұрын

@@-Shiro_ Kings actually have infinite value. Mentioned in the rules.

@San-lh8us Ай бұрын

what is the rating of a grandmaster again?

@John73John Ай бұрын

Your math at the end was wrong. You won 3 games. 100% * 100% * 100% = 1,000,000%

@sonsysy4195 Ай бұрын

Paid actods

@VeryProfessionalGamer Ай бұрын

Simp has too much testosterone, i'm starting to feel insecure.

@manstick64 Ай бұрын

sad to say, too much testosterone can always be a bad thing

@magnetsphere2872 Ай бұрын

Still cant believe there is a drawback that is literally pretty much "chess, but you cant win" Im talking about drawback that says can make best moves

@radical_rat Ай бұрын

You could theoretically win by using second-best moves and setting up a double checkmate. Not entirely sure how Stockfish would decide which checkmate is "better," but it should allow you to do one or the other.

@magnetsphere2872 Ай бұрын

Do you hear how ridiculous what you just said actually is xD

@radical_rat Ай бұрын

@@magnetsphere2872 I do, yes. Wouldn't expect anyone to actually pull that off ever, but theoretically possible. More realistically though, you just hope your opponent's drawback has a lose condition

@plynx3765 Ай бұрын

Yeah, but unironically, I stopped watching these because the drawback reveal makes it too grating for me to watch in many cases. I would like it if they had a button on the site for “offer to reveal drawback if opponent also agrees to reveal”, or “forgive opponent drawback”, but if you must reveal drawback, do it only if you think the drawback is easy or only after a certain turn or number of pieces are captured or something.