Please check out our sponsor Changes' channel for some high-quality content www.youtube.com/@CHANGES-d6p!
@djinn666Ай бұрын
This is the first time I see a sponsor that's just another KZbin channel.
@jayfakhuriАй бұрын
Hey! As a Palestinian man living in the US, let me say I'm routing for y'all! Thank you for all the work you do giving us English translations of the latest Chinese military developments and plan on joining your channel soon.
@RADICALFLOAT_95Ай бұрын
Long live China and Palestine friendship and 🇨🇳🤝🇵🇸
@Mohammadali-cs8giАй бұрын
sound more like a fake zionist trying to create anti palestinian propaganda. Israel has been selling US technology to China for the past 4 decades.
@danielmartin7838Ай бұрын
Go back to “Palestine” or move to China if that’s how you feel.
@robertbslee4209Ай бұрын
As a Chinese, no Chinese care about Palestine or Lebanon
@valyshknee4203Ай бұрын
safe to say that China's airforce will also takeover the US airforce in the future just like how the Chinese navy tookover the US navy, The industry is simply too great that i can very well see China outproducing the US with rather ease in this field aswell.
@yuugenr7549Ай бұрын
USA will start complaining about overcapacity again
@theswagman1263Ай бұрын
Here before American commenters claim Chinese products are bad because they can't cope with Chinese industry outmatching theirs
@valyshknee4203Ай бұрын
@@theswagman1263 Its pretty funny tbh, I cant wait either, I work as a shipwelder at a Naval shipyard in the Netherlands, DAMEN, We literally ditched German steel for Chinese steel back in 2019 because German steel was of poor quality and Chinese steel was both proven to be stronger aswell as cheaper, So much for western manufacturing.
@LeoChen-v6zАй бұрын
@@valyshknee4203 Hope y'all get paid a fair share of wages. Like jeez it shouldn't be THAT difficult for the shipbuilding company bosses to stop giving away shit loads of money to its stockholders and bribed government workers so pls, for god's sake, pay the actual workers more so they could live better. Welding honestly could take a toll on a worker's health so I believe there should be healthcare and monetary compensation for that.
@Joshua-dt5viАй бұрын
How, though, if America has the largest aircraft manufacturing industry in the world? The reason why Chinese shipbuilding overtook America's was because America killed its shipyards in the 90s, but that wasn't the case for aircraft production. There's a lot of talk about how chinese civilian shipbuilding can help china's navy make more ships. Well, America has the largest civilian aircraft manufacturing industry.
@seventian6117Ай бұрын
PLAAF adopt J31, gives an option to deploy an stealth fighter oversea when time comes, while still keeping J20 close to chest.
@gelinrefiraАй бұрын
I think J-20 is still very expensive. It could be cheaper than F-22 or F-35 but it is still a relatively expensive jet for the Chinese. Given that there are so many F-35s surrounding China, they need something that is cheaper, still better than F-35 and they can build in even greater numbers. Not to mention that non-western countries with no access to F-35 can buy them, boosting their capability so it neutralize any pro-western country that bought the F-35 and protecting their sovereignty. The more countries that are neutral or anti-west are able to protect their sovereignty against western meddling, the more China can weaken western hegemony. And they can still make some money, ensure their own aerospace industries remain at the cutting edge, and curry a lot of favor. Imagine countries like Malaysia, Egypt, South Africa, Brazil, Iran, even Mexico has access to a fighter that is cheaper but better than the F-35, it will change the whole balance of power.
@bigearl3867Ай бұрын
@@gelinrefira Better than the F-35? 🤣
@gelinrefiraАй бұрын
@@bigearl3867 arguably yes. Better thrust, likely can super cruise, can hold more weapons, likely higher range, comparable avionics and comparable weapons. It's not losing out in most aspects and is likely better in other aspects. It is time to stop thinking that China cannot make anything better than the US because they are already at parity. This is the 2nd mover advantage, except that China is not that interested in arms market share beyond some political benefits. They can see what the US has already produced and make something that can counter it and suit their national objectives.
@draker769Ай бұрын
J20 is interceptor not multirole
@cabasadefogo9533Ай бұрын
Excellent points made my friend. I agree, if China wants to export this plane, it has to adopt itself to show how good it is. Additionally the market is massive for this plane. Most global south countries cannot afford F35 and don't have or want the military connection with USA. In the middle east with Israrel opening talking about wanting Greater Israel which covers Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, parts of Saudi Arabia and Egypt. These countries want to break free from US weapon systems because the ones sold to them will always be neutered compared to what Israrel have from US. These countries will probably actively use J31 sooner than China, giving China the ability to assess the warplane in real combat environment and make improvements.
@truthful3777Ай бұрын
What nonsense of Israel increasing land size. If those countries don't support Hamas or Hezbollah of firing Rockets into Israel, Israel won't be bother risking their Ives to fly and bomb thse terrorist. Imagine yourself staying in your house and naughty boys from your neighbours start throwing fire crackers into your house. Won't you confront your neighbour about it? Same what happened to Israel. Who boast about shooting the Hypersonic sonic missile into Israel, it's the Hezbollah. Now Israel invade the country to deal with Hezbollah. Now you spin and said land Grab?
@sctonio1466Ай бұрын
The j31s might probably take over the current role of the j20s as the j20s will transition to that of a drone command center for their loyal wingman in the form of the twin seat j20s in the future. Due to the j31/35 as late entries, they have the added benefit of entering service when all necessary requirements for China's 5th gens are already met unlike say the earlier batches of j20s in service. Besides the unknown progress on China's H20 and US fumbling on what truly constitutes a true 6th gen, a 5.5 gen would be easier to accomplish with the twin seat j20 and better future proofing.
@HeidiKernstadАй бұрын
Yes, there is now a 2 seat variant of the J20 in development called the J20S. This additional seat is speculated to be for a drone operator who will control and manage the wingman drones. It is mind-boggling how quickly and constantly the Chinese upgrade their aircraft. In a couple of years, I am going to hear about the J20U. Unmanned AI piloted variant.
@antwangoАй бұрын
H20 any minute now... theyve recently like last month told everyone its about to be revealed... some said at the ZhuHai air show even
@@antwango nope. It's either a new version (ew) of already existing airframes, a (new) tanker w/ new engines or the much anticipated navy awacs and j31/35.
@raymondtay3532Ай бұрын
Well done China Superpower in Technologies weapons of the J-31 Stealth fighter jets in the world. 💪💪👍👍👏👏💯💯♥️♥️
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
Who let the little dogs out? Who, who, who, who, who? !!!! DON'T TOUCH HER !!!!! Who let the little dogs out? Who, who, who, who, who?
@ddmyte2003Ай бұрын
Too bad they had to steal American designs to make them. Easier to steal someone else's work than to do your own. They're a deceptive group. If they fly like the drive, America won't have to worry. They'll crash themselves 😂.
@ShaKa-RiАй бұрын
China isn’t a superpower in anything. Nice try though! When you launch a reusable rocket, or produce a mach three manned aircraft, or land a human on the moon, or any number of unnamed innovations, let me know. Until then, keep copying the west’s yesterday technology.
@ShahzadaАй бұрын
1 Pakistan most likely will be the f31s first buyer, 2nd with having a secondary Stealth platform will add up numbers and specially that being exported China will need to invest lesser as it will be the foreign buyers who can invest in the developing the platform. China will have a more refined platform and having 2 different companies building these can lower the impact if any problem occurs.
@noriakikakyoin655725 күн бұрын
i doubt pakistan has the budget for it...and jf17 is already potent for matching the indian airforce. just hope that pakistan can really develop its economy through the belt and road initiative, but the terrorist problem must be solved first.
@merrick6484Ай бұрын
This is another perfect example of High/Low setting. No need to have expensive J20 patrol sky all the time during peace time, and reduce its wear and tear over its life span. If J31 can be as stealth as it promised, although it might be slightly slower than J20, it will still give US and Allies a run for its money.😁 They might even get spooked when encounter one in the sky.
@mrtan1309Ай бұрын
I don't think the purpose of J31 is to rival the raptor but rather the Lightning. And we all know that the Lightning which is a multi-role fighter is way slower than the raptor. The lightning II only have a burner unlike this prototype of J31, so the J31 might actually be slightly faster although not as fast as the J20 (Heavy Fighter). Of course, we're not comparing about other fighting and stealth capabilities of this new prototype since we have no exact info on it yet. This model might actually be a development for the mass market to appeal to middle eastern buyers to rival even the Rafales. Just my opinion since J20 aren't for sale.
@sctonio1466Ай бұрын
Are the cost and capabilities of the two platforms really that significantly far apart to be deemed a high/low setting?
@ddmyte2003Ай бұрын
Nah. Americans aren't worried about it. Our planes are built with high standards and proven track records. Plus we put a lot more in to training and practical usage than China does. Not that they have junk equipment because that is not the case. We just have a lot more flight time and first hand experience. Our pilots are all comfortable in their platforms while china's still kinda figuring it out
@XkMengАй бұрын
@mrtan1309 J10C is enough to compete with Rafale, because of its open attitude towards PL15, J10C at least has an advantage over Rafale in air-to-air
That may be comrade, but as for the J20 its ground attack capabilities are basically non existent. It is exclusively an air superiority fighter. A few small glide bombs maybe but that's it. The J10 and J16 have very good ground attack options, but tommorow's battlefield may show that you need stealth aircraft which can perform heavy ground attack missions. That's why the US ditched the F22 for the F35. I personally think that that was a big mistake on their part and that they should have kept both, but bottom line is that the PLAAF would benefit from a stealth Multirole. At the same time, it is possible that stealth strike aircraft are a silly concept and that doing ground attack missions with a plane which costs an arm and a leg is not practical. I'm not a general, I can't say.
@leoli2450Ай бұрын
Recently ive seen photos suggesting that 076 have a double island structure, think you might make a video on that?
@Nero-CaesarАй бұрын
Love this jet and your coverage of it thanks
@xiaodisun-lf5ymАй бұрын
This is an export fighter jet. I believe many countries are looking forward to buying it, especially the countries surrounding Israel.
@ArdiantothehulkАй бұрын
countries surrounding Israel except Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen are all American allies. Also, those 3 nations can't afford to buy fighter jets
@hjhghj462Ай бұрын
@@Ardiantothehulk They are not allies of the united states, they have no military alliances. They are just "friendly countries" that have been penetrated by cia.
@horridohobbiesАй бұрын
Isn't the J-20 an air superiority fighter? I surmise the J-31 could serve a multi-role purpose, like the F-35 relative to the F-22.
@accountantthe3394Ай бұрын
Yes
@oot007Ай бұрын
J20 is more expensive as it is larger, higher spec and uses WS-15 engine. J-31 will be using WS-10 engine which is far less powerful and cheaper to produce
@EurasiaNavalАй бұрын
Interesting. Can you elaborate why you think J-31 will use the WS-10 (given J-35 is going for the WS-19)?
@oot007Ай бұрын
@@EurasiaNaval typo my bad. However if the WS-10 can physically fit inside the J-35/J-10 I wouldn't be surprised if they get upgraded. This would give them between 240-280 kN rather than 196 kN total compared to 191 kN of it's adversary.
@pooyasafaei2538Ай бұрын
@@oot007 its not wise to use an engine designed dominantly for 4th gen aircrafts on 5th gen as one of its capabilities must be super cruise. Thats why development of a real engine for a 5th gen, ws15, took such a long time
@oot007Ай бұрын
@@pooyasafaei2538 I'm sure there were reports that the J20 using WS10 as interim engines was able to supercruise. If that is true then J35 using WS10 would do so as well being a lighter smaller plane.
@李大人-m7pАй бұрын
ws10b=f110-ge-129
@frank-y8nАй бұрын
US sources talk about a war with China within a few years. China might want to increase its number of fighter planes by setting up a production line for J-31s. Part of the production might be diverted for export to friends while the line is set up to produce more aircraft than needed for that purpose.
@taiwanstillisntacountryАй бұрын
USA propaganda 😂😂😂. Poor people cant wage war
@tigersilberhannes9153Ай бұрын
@@taiwanstillisntacountry The ruling class hopes to bundle and envigarate the population with war, you see that in Europe as well, they tried (and failed) to get everyone excited about a war with Russia.
@TomDrezАй бұрын
If us launch a strike on china considering it's carriers based f-35 only have a range of 1.200 km their ships necessarily gonna end up in range of many hypersonic china have so it'll be a sea battle, on china's coast, it can destroy any carrier and military base in range with missile artillery from the mainland so i don't think there's gonna be much of a battle in the air, china's fleet is bigger and better equiped than the ageing us one, the us fleet main capabilities when it come to navy is based on power projection with carrier and amphibious assault ships, that mean a limited number of big targets that are much more problematic to lose than the ship china make because china has a better shipbuilding industry than anybody else it's half the ships produced on the planet, and us ships suit a power projection role, which is strategic to maintain their empire, if China's fleet take damage it's still capable of defending it's shore very well with the help of the ground forces and air forces, if the u.s fleet take damages it's a disaster for their hegemony, so a war with china from the u.s part no matter how many vassal they bring along with them just show the complete desperation to keep their power.
@hanhuang7263Ай бұрын
@@TomDrezUS fleet is still better ,but I think you mean the seventh carrier strike group of the US. If the USA doesn't send reinforcement, then US will lose, but if the US sends reinforcement, them china has a problem.
@oot007Ай бұрын
@@hanhuang7263imaginary reinforcements from where? They'll be tracked as soon as they leave port and sunk halfway across the ocean.
@RdgrefgggfffhjtfvvgfdfvhgffvАй бұрын
Please make video on type 076,it 2 island structure are also installed,
@DJs021Ай бұрын
From Modern Chinese Warplanes? Lol that page flooded with all snowflakes from UK claiming 076 copy from their AC structures 😅
@Blackbirdz2000Ай бұрын
i think these J31s will be for PAF. A lot of pics r being shown which is unusual same as they were showing PAF's J10CE's.....also CCP is marketing J31s to other countries too.
@remix-yy1hs26 күн бұрын
Cpc*
@phils4634Ай бұрын
Low observability might be useful against AEW assets, and would allow closer range engagement of such assets. China can almost certainly build these at an attractive price point vs capability, so they might well be yet another Chinese export! (Whilst possibly keeping some for the PLAAF to supplement their existing fleet of J-35's)
@merrick6484Ай бұрын
The entire Global South countries can have a 5 gen stealth fighters that they dreamed for.
@christophmahlerАй бұрын
We really need realistic production cost estimates per unit in order to assess the likely doctrinal role of the FC-31. From the airframe geometry alone, it will remain obscure whether the FC-31 resembles the F-35 (originally meant as a 5th generation lightweight replacement of the 1700 units of F-16, but with four times the cost at an unrealistically high price) or the Su-75 (specifically designed as a low-end export of some limited 5th generation features with the entire production line offered to India, similar to the MiG-21). Pakistan's interest points to the latter assumption - exactly mirroring Russian exports within the India-Pakistan balance of power.
@Dos895Ай бұрын
I thought "Jian" meant "sword" as in the classic double edged straight sword? Regarding a PL Air Force J-31 variant, I like the idea.
@cheungchingtongАй бұрын
Double edged straight sword = 剑 (jiàn) Fourth Mandarin tone. Eliminate = 歼 (jiān) First Mandarin tone. The J here means eliminate, annihilate, destroy or exterminate.
@EurasiaNavalАй бұрын
Regarding the meaning of Jian, it depends on the tone. Chinese is a very tonal language (although less so than Vietnamese)
@Dos895Ай бұрын
Thanks for the explanation guys!🍻
@cheungchingtongАй бұрын
@@EurasiaNaval Chinese is a tonal language, but the amount of tones depends on which dialect of it that you are talking about, for example, Mandarin has four, Cantonese has nine, and Teochew has thirteen.
@ともこともこ-k3rАй бұрын
jian=殲 殲滅=make species extinct
@Kirin426Ай бұрын
J-31 might serve to slowly replace the J-10 fleet as older J-10s start being phased out. Being a smaller fighter, it fits the niche of the J-10. However a counterargument may be that the J-10 is still a relatively new platform , first entering service only 20 years ago.
@HardyMungАй бұрын
Twin engines is better than one engine, if one engine fail, another one is still working.
@ShaKa-RiАй бұрын
Sure if the engine is of Chinese origin!
@ibrahimmir3801Ай бұрын
paf pilots also test flew it recently and are undergoing training to use in as of now in China
@lionheart3025Ай бұрын
🤫
@ibrahimmir3801Ай бұрын
@@lionheart3025 evone knows it atm
@Lucasleno152Ай бұрын
@@ibrahimmir3801true?
@Lucasleno152Ай бұрын
@@ibrahimmir3801 I just saw rumors on the Chinese Internet
@davidk6269Ай бұрын
Thank you for another informative video!
@liaojohnweechun7454Ай бұрын
Great Informative Video 👍
@benibky6281Ай бұрын
wow, what a beautiful fighter plane Thank you for the info,
@IrishCarneyАй бұрын
It makes sense for them to have the J-31 in their air force. The old high-low mix was the Su-27/30/J-11/J-16 in the high end, and the J-10 on the low end. With the J-20 replacing the Flanker family, and the J-31 replacing the J-10 family and even older planes.
@bf799Ай бұрын
I think the most high-end ones are the J-20 and F-22. Their backs are very straight and their flying posture is like a flying saucer.
@AlanThree001Ай бұрын
Maybe the J-31 can transform into a robot a.k.a Macross/Robotech style lol... That'll blow people's mind.
@Azathoth2980Ай бұрын
That isn’t how Chinese SF work 😂 in their idea this should transform into a sledge hammer moving at MK20
@daniels0376Ай бұрын
@@Azathoth2980Aftet the pilot fires all the missiles he bails out, then the wings, tail and cockpit detatch and the engines separate and turn into cruise missiles 😂
@Azathoth2980Ай бұрын
@@daniels0376 yes that is Chinese SF, as pioneered by the 3 body. No room for romance.
@leeway777Ай бұрын
It will dramatically accelerate the production speed of stealth fighters. Two factories will make J20s and F31s at least twice as fast as one that makes complex J20s. There will also be redundancy for unexpected accidents.
@Black_Sun_Dark_StarАй бұрын
I just have one little problem with your clip. Please work on the pronunciation difference between "Thirty" and "Fifty". I keep mishearing the "J-31" for "J-51".
@cangzhang3849Ай бұрын
I want to see the j-40, come bro i know they got more advanced stuff😂
@Michael-c9f5mАй бұрын
if they have similar flight and stealth performance. the J20 has bigger payload and longer range. single driving factor is just pure cost.
@F.u.BelitongАй бұрын
Nicely when wacthing j35 increasing stages variants on the starights ways.
@mmmayocideАй бұрын
I'm Asian American AND I SUPPORT CHINA!!!
@DboyugbАй бұрын
You could always move back
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
Your lying
@XkMengАй бұрын
@Dboyugb He is an American, born in the United States, where do you want him to go back?
@mmmayocideАй бұрын
@@Dboyugb racist
@douginorlando6260Ай бұрын
Could become a Hi-Low mix of land based stealth fighters. J20 with longer range larger internal payload and better performance at high altitudes vs J31. Especially if you can buy 3 J31 for the price of 2 J20. Could be similar to F4 and F18 (both originally Naval aircraft, then adapted for land based operations). All the design effort and future upgrade efforts done for the Navy will already be paid. Maybe China has plans to evolve the J31 into a stealth drone loyal wingman
@AaronDsilva-w3rАй бұрын
I think j 35 and j 31 will be some of the best navel fighters when it active
@manishdyall4779Ай бұрын
THe FC-31 does a few jobs, fill a few niches, which would justify fielding both J-20 and J-31. For starters, the J-31 can be China's export 5th gen fighter, enabling China to win market sales (1), and allowing CHina to gain expereince working with allied nations and ensuring interoperability (2), sustain production lines since not all nations would be able to demand indigenous production (3). and finally the experience gained from J-31 can enable China to further J-20 supremacy ensuring hte next blocks of J-20 are built with the lessons learnt from J-31 (4).
@UmarFarooq-bs7ziАй бұрын
I m form Pakistan, very good china keep it up
@e734127803Ай бұрын
How about wingman drones, are they going to be force multiplayer? Like dark sword. China might operate several stealth aircrafts fleets: J-20 J-31/35 Dark sword GJ-11 WZ-8 CH-xx stealth H-20! Agree?
@Glory-to-God.Ай бұрын
J31 has been under testing for the last 20 years
@motoangleradventures7458Ай бұрын
Only prove how CH lags behind the US as the US has been enjoying air dominance with their stealth fighters. CH just released its own version of their copy of the F22. If you notice their engines emit black smoke, they haven't perfected their fighter engines yet.
@曲冰剧傲Ай бұрын
The difference between Russia and the United States, the early Chinese aircraft engine was influenced by the Soviet aircraft engine, the afterburner and other designs are different, but also lead to the flame color and other performance is not the same.
@simonchowkwchow5083Ай бұрын
"Jian" means, depending on the Chinese character, arrow or war. 😊
J31 100% strength fighter jet j31 next world number one
@manishdyall4779Ай бұрын
Ah, the FC-31 Gyrfalcn, or as you call it, J-31, the fighter the USA and NATO could've fielded if only they were nice to Russia. Instead we are stuck with F-35, and given the TF Kaan and Su-75, incorporating RUssia into NATO could well have meant that we could field both F-35 and (a NATO version of) J-31.
@fatdoi003Ай бұрын
some ask who would want to buy this J31..... i'd say any country who wants to move away from Nato gears or countries that's not allow to buy F35....
@jahanzebkhan7879Ай бұрын
PAKISTAN AIR FORCE ❤
@richardseeto1182Ай бұрын
Thanks!
@EurasiaNavalАй бұрын
Thanks Richard 😊
@nasirali6565Ай бұрын
China❤
@fdjw88Ай бұрын
The original plan of the F-35 is to accompany the F-22 in battle. The F-22 will be the high-end aircraft and the F-35 will be the lower end aircraft for the US airforce. Maybe the Chinese wants to do that with their FC-31 and J-20?
@january10005Ай бұрын
F22 is too old for today tech. Still use canon for air fight 😂Hollywood movies love this, same like the moon landing
@LeoChen-v6zАй бұрын
@@january10005 moon landing? interesting...
@ArdiantothehulkАй бұрын
@@january10005F22 still far better than J20
@TheArtofWarChinaАй бұрын
J stands for" to battle " in chinese
@EcstaticgoatАй бұрын
The land version is for Pakistan airforce..
@antwangoАй бұрын
Would be another platform for PLAAF to test and R n D and Guage certain technologies and trends that dont affect their main inventory??? I dont see the harm in developing more knowledge or developing a backup.... i mean they already know the capabilities to have sanctioned the J35 variant.... so theyve already given the carrier version the big thumbs up... The J20 being the stealthy sniper that currently doesnt seem to have cannons of any sort.... and you know it wont fall into the wrong hands etc if the J20 remains home grown etc..... maybe its a ploy, the J31 may have hints and secrets of the F22 etc.... essentially China revealing and flexing to SAM!? LOL
@bluestar2253Ай бұрын
India will now opt to buy the American F-22 and F-35 to counter Pakistan's J-31
@hellothere1656Ай бұрын
They can't because the f22 is not for sale or in production and f35 is only sold to US allies of which india is not considered because of its close relations to Russia and because india bought s400. The US blocked the sale of f35 to NATO ally Turkiye because of fears of s400 radar data of the f35 being unknowingly transferred to Russia. India basically has no 5th gen option at the moment. Indian media even admitted that Pakistan's airforce would be a whole 14 years ahead of india once Pakistan gets j31. A 5th gen be it an f35 or j31 has a 15:1 kill ratio against 4th gens.
@bobbyr8071Ай бұрын
India won’t be getting either. US will make u start at 40 year old f16 😂😂😂
@badlav120Ай бұрын
India will never buy American jets ( strings attached ) . Rather they are working on their own hybrid platform with multiple drones and wingmen also working on their own next gen fighter .
@hellothere1656Ай бұрын
@@badlav120 which is probably gonna be poor quality like that flop tejas that nobody wants.
@bluestar2253Ай бұрын
@@badlav120 Why you don't like our American jets? Are you being racist?!
@watb8689Ай бұрын
China still need a multirole stealth fighter plane. this is to defend china's airspace. J-10 might see retirement in 10 years
@ekujohnson1362Ай бұрын
Point of correction, The USA surrounded with military bases, "WHO'S AGGRESSIVE HERE"?!!!
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
Keep lying to yourself. Ask your local ccp Overlord which propaganda to spread
@ShaKa-RiАй бұрын
What?
@TharindaEdirisingheАй бұрын
Pakistan has no reason to buy this. Pakistan has no enemy 🤔
@alexy9124Ай бұрын
there is so many errors in this video, 1. there is no f-16 on top of the j-31. f-16 have a SINGLE vertical stabilizer and the picture clearly have TWO. How can you make that stupid mistake if you going to talk about fighter jet. 2. when you building a prototype you don't build everything all at once. F-35C did not have shit like 2 wheels or folding wings until later on. this kind of video is stupid when this guy is so misleading.
@EurasiaNavalАй бұрын
I said J-16, not F-16. J-16 has two vertical stabilizers. Do not make false accusations. Why would you see an F-16 in China? I don't delete comments out of principle, but if I do, yours would be the first to go.
@Glory-to-God.Ай бұрын
It will takè at least 5 more years for j31 to become operational
@李大人-m7pАй бұрын
路边社说它要定型量产了
@Kenton-wr4oqАй бұрын
Gaijin When ???
@VanConstance-z2qАй бұрын
Chasity Locks
@Wvk5zcАй бұрын
J-31 can merge/fuse with j-20 to become hypersonic jet 😂
@hadiwiyanto4451Ай бұрын
Who will be the buyer ?
@taiwanstillisntacountryАй бұрын
Not poor 3rd-brotha 😂😂😂
@tigersilberhannes9153Ай бұрын
Anyone who used to get F-16 for free, which The Empire can no longer affort, so once States have to actually pay for their airforce, chinese options will become more and more popular.
@maniac3449Ай бұрын
Whatever it is, this jet will be expensive. There is basically no way a country can sell a stealth for less than $50 million per jet. The minimum tag would be around $70 million to $80 million for a J-31 and around $100 million for a J-35.
@SpicysaucedАй бұрын
Everyone who wanted to buy a stealth fighter, but can't get it from the US. Potentially half the world. If I was China I would heavily subsidize these so buyers can get them cheap-ish. Iran comes to mind, maybe even Russia, Brazil, Pakistan, Egypt, Libya and so on. This fighter could give sanctioned countries a) a deep connection to China since these projects are always long-term and b) a chance against the US bully and independence from arms sanctions. This fighter could be for the arms market what Chinese batteries and EVs have done for the civilian car market.
@merrick6484Ай бұрын
The entire Global South (thats 80% of world population).
@TimBrianTufugaАй бұрын
Yes yes yes!!!!!🙂👏
@xinyiquan666Ай бұрын
hi
@Saj14356Ай бұрын
J10C is way better than F16s according to Pakistan 🇵🇰 airforce PAF
@ButergoАй бұрын
No better but comparable...
@megamax08911 күн бұрын
It has wings, must be a copy of US technology 😊😊😊
@Iinshort99Ай бұрын
Make a video on US B-21 bomber
@bobbyr8071Ай бұрын
H20
@Hamzashahab096Ай бұрын
So excited to see it in Pakistani color 🇵🇰❤️
@lastbreathempire3443Ай бұрын
Bloody terrorists can't your country design own technology only eyeing others innovation
@SnowLeopard2121Ай бұрын
Congratulations. Pakistan using a 3 Grade National Jet Fighter. jf-17, J-10 and and future J-35 zzzzz
@redblueyankee8343Ай бұрын
Paki terrorists who kill Chinese people every day now want Chinese weapons? You can't do anything yourself?
@abyyy490Ай бұрын
@@SnowLeopard2121 currypooper mad. Go poop somewhere else. Child Rapist.
@islamicsenseiАй бұрын
@@SnowLeopard2121 You got better options?
@TheMAnoneGodJESUSChristАй бұрын
It looks like a f 22 raptor that USA has ummm 🤔🧐🧐🤔🧐
@erniechoАй бұрын
Africa and Middle East can take down stealth planes, they bring them to China to reverse engineer.. Making J-31 even cheaper to build... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@LeoCooper-n2kАй бұрын
Why you act like idiots but actually are Joker or clown
@刚王-d3sАй бұрын
中国不会逆向更差的飞机。
@lancedao1273Ай бұрын
Our news media talk us its was copy F35 😮😮😢😂😅
@thomas_jayАй бұрын
Maybe China can sell it to Russia.
@daniels0376Ай бұрын
Russia has their own 5th gens and they are very good, but they have lots of bottlenecks with them particularly when it comes to engines. And so because of that they cannot produce them in significant numbers. If China wants to help Russia develop their airforce then they should (and they 100% already are to some extent) help with industrial materials, electronics and financial assistance.
@WaseemAhmed-m2yАй бұрын
Boycott American weapons
@BruceSarbiАй бұрын
Sell to Iran.
@RADICALFLOAT_95Ай бұрын
Yes but actually no
@bombatom7042Ай бұрын
the answer is simple,china need more aircraft
@daveh5947Ай бұрын
Will they use them in Iraq? kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2LGdqybbLpln5osi=RIKbzSLUUO9RNJbL .
@ahvidaneidavirgilluminous8754Ай бұрын
F22
@knahshalАй бұрын
F35 with 2 engines 😂
@pt-pmlbАй бұрын
china jet engine technology still far away from usa
@David-dq4xnАй бұрын
Stop showing fake video. These are CGI generated
@Wvk5zcАй бұрын
you are so desperate. Arent you
@ryanpzy9336Ай бұрын
F-35 from Temu? 🤣
@JiuBaNNNАй бұрын
Check ur brain 😂
@jefrey123Ай бұрын
Many j variant it means a junk
@limbehh8494Ай бұрын
C'mon it look like another copycat ???😂😂😂
@kumaroadking1580Ай бұрын
Stolen tech
@onggiao7437Ай бұрын
IT is fake
@kumaroadking1580Ай бұрын
Crap
@Null-o7jАй бұрын
Kind of a boring plane to be honest. Hard to differentiate from the Korean KAI or that Turkish plane. Just an AK-47 tier stealth plane.
@mwxfl-q9hАй бұрын
Forget about them, they are not on the same level. For example, they don’t even have Diverterless supersonic inlet.
@hmskinggeorgev7089Ай бұрын
F22/35 copy
@mydad156Ай бұрын
Look jealous 😁
@partricklin9749Ай бұрын
only copy is f35 is copy of mig144 f22 is copy of mig31
@jason59k55Ай бұрын
thats like saying the F-15 is a copy of the MIG-25
@hellothere1656Ай бұрын
When u spend years of wind tunnel testing to make the most optimal stealth plane that can also be supersonic and agile, u get something that looks kinda like the f22. If u prioritise more stealth over everything else, then u get something that looks like yf23.
@hmskinggeorgev7089Ай бұрын
@@jason59k55 The thing the lot of you guys forget is that China gained all the most of its designs for everything from the J-20 onward came from a major data theft operation from a Chinese agent who stole the plans from Lockheed Martin. Most important of which was stealth shape and stealth coating materials used in the F-22/35.
@EmarElutinАй бұрын
Copy paste, fake stealth.🤣🤣🤣
@jason59k55Ай бұрын
found the racism
@hellothere1656Ай бұрын
How could it be fake stealth if it's copy of real stealth? Use ur 🧠 😂
@jason59k55Ай бұрын
you must be delusional or suffer some sort of undiagnosed blindness
@ButergoАй бұрын
Burnol 😂
@SnowLeopard2121Ай бұрын
Most of the actual specifications for Chinese Jet fighters are private. What we know about Chinese Jet fighters are mostly inflated figures from China's propaganda department. The real performance can be seen indirectly. For example, we can see the actual performance of Chinese Jet fighters in cases such as China-Thailand air warfare training. The performance of short-range missiles is similar to that of the West, but it can be seen that the performance of radars is very exaggerated above medium-range. A large Chinese jet fighter is showing lower performance than a small Western jet fighter's radar.
@N4k5gАй бұрын
雷达关键元料中国垄断的,美国只有落后的雷达稀土材料。
@HeidiKernstadАй бұрын
“Most of the actual specifications for Chinese Jet fighters are private.” also “What we know about Chinese Jet fighters are mostly inflated figures from China’s propaganda department.” These are contradictory statements. If the actual specifications for Chinese jet fighters are classified, how do you know they are mostly inflated figures coming from China’s propaganda department? What if China is actually downplaying these figures and making their jets seem less threatening than they actually are to keep the adversary unaware and complacent? How do you know that your narrative that Chinese aircraft are inherently inferior to Western aircraft was not injected into your thought process via the 1 billion dollars the U.S. spends on anti-China propaganda? As for aerial military exercises between non-allies, most countries either do not use their BVR capability or they limit their radar when practicing with countries who are not close allies. This is to keep the specs about their radar classified. This would explain the “low performance” of the Chinese radars if what you are saying is actually true. So many rumors being spread about the inferiority of Chinese equipment.
@RichardsMiscCornerАй бұрын
are you talking about the report early this year? the grippons vs su-27? that was the only one that was publically made available - and that was in 2019 against su-27's or J-11 - none of which we are talking about now. Also that was only BVR (41 to 9) - once they were in WVR - the su27's had a 25:1 kill ratio. Also, the commentator's wrote - that was a whole ago, and that PLAAF fared better with the J-10C/A variants. Btw, the J-11 uses the N001VE Russian Radar.
@SnowLeopard2121Ай бұрын
@@HeidiKernstad Did that cut deep? zzzz
@DJs021Ай бұрын
We also heard about China ICBM loaded with water fuel and can't flew out of South China Sea due to rampant corruption but they just tested 20years ago developed ICBM across one whole continent with Mach30 reaching the destination at Pacific ocean. If you come here to flex about your western doctrinated narratives, not just cut deep but dream deep as well.
@genius25176 күн бұрын
They can't showcase them just incase they stall and crash. Russian pilots and fighter jets are the best in the world. 😍😍😍 RURU!!
@Sole-proprietorАй бұрын
While India introducing a modern stealth jet called" cow mooter lora fighter" 😅😅😅
@HeviFirzaАй бұрын
CHINA NOT TAIWAN 🎉🎉
@CharlieLasMarias-vx5ijАй бұрын
Thats nothing. A piece of flying of tin of sardines. No match largely with the F16 much more F22.
@xiaojiucaidaiwanАй бұрын
china is justice power of the world
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
??
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
Let me help you. china compares itself to America. America compares itself to itself. Middle kingdom hahahaha --- you mean last place kingdom. china look very strong and powerful bullying unarmed woman and children. Drops mic.....