I can now listen to a conversation between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss while sitting on my couch here in Bangladesh. Thank you internet.
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5_OfnRmoZx0nJo Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets. I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
@maxblack57784 жыл бұрын
from Pakistan !! :)
@aurumvoraxpp42224 жыл бұрын
Thank you for remind of this fact. I sometimes forget about the modern marvel of the internet, even with its warts an all.
@shadeassassin92484 жыл бұрын
@@TheConstitutionFirst That was a lot of copious, inane and illiterate word vomit.
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
@@shadeassassin9248 Maybe! Puke?
@xzapken6 жыл бұрын
I have been reading or listening to Noam for 63 years and I still get something out of it.
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
Marxist philosophy is just plain fun and inherently moral: This video Nails it! kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5_OfnRmoZx0nJo
@romaknafel41164 жыл бұрын
How old are you?
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
@@romaknafel4116 10 I am in High School.
@beachcomber20084 жыл бұрын
Me too.
@kyuradorinuddlecourt50634 жыл бұрын
@@matthewbroe904 ikr
@qwertyqart9 жыл бұрын
damn it, he is 86 year old and he is most lucid, self-aware, conscientious and mindful person I have ever heard.
@doreekaplan258911 ай бұрын
He's now 95, still the same
@qwertyqart11 ай бұрын
@@doreekaplan2589 oh boy, I commented that 8 years ago, so much has changed since than, so much… new information has emerged, and I can see patterns now much better
@generaldamage32829 жыл бұрын
Chomsky is an intellectual activist, considering and exploring issues before forming an opinion then acting on them - a great example. He will be one of the few who are respected far into the future when people look back.
@katarinaaram5885 жыл бұрын
He merely does what most of us were told in school we should do, in terms of thinking and laying out an argument. We simply refuse to have open and honest discussions. It's not really intelligence that's lacking.
@pietzsche5 жыл бұрын
@@katarinaaram588 He's exceptionally good at spotting and disregarding bullshit
@patrickbaillargeon80515 жыл бұрын
Where are they going to do their looking back from? From a voice from 2020.
@emanuelflutes55044 жыл бұрын
Tasit.
@harryf27054 жыл бұрын
He’s an idiot with the same conclusion to every equation. America bad. It’s like Trump. Everything Trump does the answer is Orange Man bad. Trump sends troops to Syria, Orange man bad. Trump brings troops home from Syria, Orange Man bad. Well Chomsky which one is it? Maybe Chomsky should think a little deeper. Krauss isn’t much better. Krauss tells us that the universe came from nothing. Krauss couldn’t tell us where life comes from. He couldn’t create a single protein let alone a complete cell. And then he gets political which makes him a blithering idiot. Ditto with God.
@riz33108 жыл бұрын
It has to blow Chomsky's mind that all these kids react to him like a rock star. Dude is legit cool
@Jarjarjar215 жыл бұрын
I'm sure it give him some hope.
@schr4nz5 жыл бұрын
@@Jarjarjar21 I agree... I think once upon a time he would've reacted to that in a negative light, i.e. don't revere me... now he sees it as "there's a new generation that are going to challenge the status quo"
@samerdrich55795 жыл бұрын
Aside form politics, can anyone tell me why is Chomsky so admired? I doubt that his followers understand his work on linguistics, so I suspect the admiration comes from Chomsky's political stance.
@schr4nz5 жыл бұрын
@@samerdrich5579 he's like a Bernie Sanders of the intellectual world, he's been morally consistent and had the gall to stick it out for 90 years, the man has been consistently calling out atrocious and inhumane foreign policy decisions since forever. He's a reliable and trustworthy point of information, why wouldn't people be appreciative of him?
@mpgallogly5 жыл бұрын
He is a rock star!
@KabulTour4 жыл бұрын
Professor Chomsky, a true intellectual and wonderful human being
@bryanpinto40513 жыл бұрын
who is an untrue intellectual?
@Arareemote2 жыл бұрын
@@bryanpinto4051 Have you never heard of sophistry?
@lynnlynn13172 жыл бұрын
kzbin.infojvs2FZlJguQ👈🏻👈🏻😐😐🤔🤔
@nachoking82894 жыл бұрын
Simply i can say i love NOAM CHOMSKY .
@freydenker63354 жыл бұрын
same here in germany
@larjkok11844 жыл бұрын
I’m sure he loves you too, nacho man.
@JaIch99994 жыл бұрын
@@freydenker6335 Same here. Another German.
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
Marxist philosophy is just plain fun and inherently moral: This video Nails it! kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5_OfnRmoZx0nJo
@rexie19324 жыл бұрын
@@TheConstitutionFirst I like how you classified the Nazi's as socialist xdddd, v accurate
@livefreeanddonttread9 жыл бұрын
As someone who loves learning and the pursuit of knowledge, and who has an appreciation of critical thinking, I highly value Chomsky's take on deflating your ability to orate efficaciously in order that people value what you say, and not just how you say it. At the same time, your burden is passing along the idea of critical thinking. And if the benefactor doesnt already possess, then you have to be oratorically persuasive. It like the epitome of irony. I love the whole landscape painted by these two artists, and crave more of it.
@Tristan_again9 жыл бұрын
Absolutely brilliant wide-ranging discussion. Be sure to watch part 2, the 45 minute Q&A follow-up.
@sacredweeds3 жыл бұрын
The opening introduction brought tears to my eyes. I've been following Noam for decades and he never disappoints even if the subject matter may be disturbing. Very well worth the extra time. ❤
@MuonRay9 жыл бұрын
Excellent Discussion between Professors Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss, kindred spirits in the search for truth and liberty in a world that is always at a critical crossroads between enlightenment, creativity and peace to irrationality, destruction and aggression. It is really great to see the two of these great men in discussion about everything from human intelligence, social structures to conflict and aggression and the development of our civilization both technologically and morally and the responsibility of intellectuals to seek the truth and expose lies no matter what authorities say.
@TerrenceLeeReed9 жыл бұрын
Awesome dialogue, thanks Muon Ray
@SIMKINETICS9 жыл бұрын
Muon Ray Well said!
@forcemajeure729 жыл бұрын
I.
@homerco2139 жыл бұрын
Ray N Today is of course Holocaust remembrance day. Critics like Keith Harman Snow critique what he calls the Holocaust Industry; and the profits being made off of countless heinous murders. Contrast that with zero collective memory in the West about the murder of Cambodians by the Khmer Rouge. First hand accounts such as this put into acute contrast the wildly differing results of mass genocide on a population years later. Needless to say both are disturbing.
@twonumber229 жыл бұрын
Muon Ray Subbed lol
@shaolin897 жыл бұрын
Lawrence Krauss defines what a good interviewer is: Somebody who ask questions and shuts up once the interviewee starts speaking.
@viggosimonsen5 жыл бұрын
But most importantly, also contributes with own qualified arguments, so that it becomes a real live dialogue. Just reading loud questions is not good interviewing.
@Jimyblues4 жыл бұрын
Well said / makes The Hannity elk look like preschoolers
@DiogenesNephew4 жыл бұрын
@@kaanarslan2264 lolllll AIGHT
@suzannfulbright56524 жыл бұрын
@@Jimyblues They are preschoolers.
@jaylo20224 жыл бұрын
I had a feeling that he wasn't even listening. :)
@arjitjere15593 жыл бұрын
This guys knowledge is astounding. The breadth and the depth
@cgme70764 жыл бұрын
Could you imagine seeing him sitting on a bench and feeding pigeons? You'd sit down, say one thing, and realize very quickly that this man is an absolute genius. Quite a surprise but a welcome one.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems3 жыл бұрын
Me: ...Thoughts... Chomsky: Well, in fact... Five hours later... So in conclusion. Me: 🧐 You don't say.
@adrianjanssens71164 жыл бұрын
At this point, I don't know what is to come. But the intoduction to Noam Chomsky by Krauss is a great start. Thank you all involved in making this available here.
@respublikas9 жыл бұрын
My respect for L.Krauss skyrocketed.Brave man very brave and exactly what sort of people this age of humans needs,hopefully more of the bright people will speak up !not against america against the greed against injustice for all our sake
@dreamingrightnow11744 жыл бұрын
Let's not go into Krauss's character please; spoil the mood.
@MikkelGrumBovin4 жыл бұрын
fool
@MikkelGrumBovin4 жыл бұрын
@@dreamingrightnow1174 he loves to come across as a "Naughty boy" Krauss is a terrible nontalent - a disgrace to his field , and a "Assgrabber" - with a long lineup of young female students he just couldnt help himself from grabbing and being a total sexist jerkoff , who believe AYNYONE find his craterface and plumb style, attracting,-
@dreamingrightnow11744 жыл бұрын
@@MikkelGrumBovin Yeah, and don't even get me started on his Jeffrey Epstein adoration...
@syed95764 жыл бұрын
anybody watching this quarantined, and misses sitting in theater to listen to lectures and debates like this?
@MikkelGrumBovin4 жыл бұрын
no
@Creamy6oodness4 жыл бұрын
No. I hated school and dropped out of college. The rigidity was too much. But I listen to this sort of stuff while I drive, cook, lift weights etc. Sometimes I think I have some form of ADHD
@dnevnaabica42764 жыл бұрын
... well I do! I agree with you and miss it a lot.
@a0flj04 жыл бұрын
@@Creamy6oodness You might very well. During college, I had to smoke a cigarette each break to slow my brain down to be able to withstand the slow pace of the courses. I learned way more spending time in the library, studying all the books on a matter I could find, solving problems on my own. But that's also where I believe Chomsky makes a mistake. Not everybody is built this way. Most of my fellow students were not interested in doing that huge intellectual effort. They were much more interested in getting knowledge poured into their heads like a liquid. Also, only a few of the professors were able to each me by just watching over my shoulder, telling me that there's another book I should read, or that what I was looking into might be connected to some other field I may want to look into, and just very discreetly guiding me, based on the huge knowledge they themselves had already accumulated, at the same time being humble about it. If we'd rely on the few professors of this kind, and on the few students who are willing and able to learn this way, we'd still be in the middle ages, and modern science would be magic to most people.
@ToxicTurtleIsMad3 жыл бұрын
@@Creamy6oodness maybe you are just an idiot :)
@maguidarivera12839 жыл бұрын
This was an excellent interview which I have share in every possible place I can post awareness. Thank you Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss
4 жыл бұрын
*Look through the pictures & you will find Krauss hanging out with Epstein Birds of a feather flock together = Once a friend of presidents, the ultra-rich and the elite of Wall Street’s bankers - plus a major benefactor to Harvard University - Jeffrey Epstein handled portfolios estimated to be worth over $15 billion. Then he became ensnared in a scandal involving the sexual abuse of underage girls. He is seen here, pre-scandal, at left, in conversation with Alan Dershowitz, one of America’s best-known legal experts and a Harvard Law professor emeritus, at a Cambridge event. Dershowitz became a key member of Epstein’s legal team. Read more here: www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article232385422.html#storylink=cpy Harvey Weinstein, Jeffery Epstein & Hugh Hefner were molesting all those that wanted initiation into his world. There pictures of Harvey with Jeffrey Epstein = i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article21054671.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/4_PAY-Epstein-Maxwella.jpg Oprah feeding Harvey = pbs.twimg.com/media/DTB1B12VQAAOHKa?format=jpg&name=small Harvey feeding Bill Clinton = duckduckgo.com/?q=Harvey+with+Jeffrey+Epstein&t=ffab&atb=v241-4__&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn1.thr.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F2016%2F11%2Fmc_05987_approved-h_2016.jpg Revealed: Bill Clinton, Mick Jagger and Donald Trump were in black book of Prince Andrew’s sex abuser friend Jeffrey Epstein www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2897836/How-Prince-Andrew-s-sex-abuser-friend-Jeffrey-Epstein-kept-list-nicknamed-Holy-Grail-great-good-Bill-Clinton-Tony-Blair-Mick-Jagger-Donald-Trump.html Billionaire Pervert Jeffrey Epstein And His Famous Friends A Primer archive.org/details/BillionairePervertJeffreyEpsteinAndHisFamousFriendsAPrimer1/page/n9/mode/2up *lawrence krauss, Steven Pinker, Obama, Bloomberg, Trump, Naomi Campbell, Hillary Clinton, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Rothschilds, former member of charles Manson gang Nancy Pelosi, Lawrence Summers, Bill Gates, Alec Baldwin, Oprah, Katie Couric, George Stephanopoulos, Prince Andrew, Kenneth Starr, ADRENOCHROME 101, WALNUT SAUCE, HOLLYWOOD SICKO'S JONESING kzbin.info/www/bejne/kH6vdHlprtOrnc0 imgur.com/Al0vGo0 freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/bloomberg-weinstein.jpg cdn.newspunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/weinstein-epstein.jpg pbs.twimg.com/media/D3ywNHvW4AAquAT.jpg img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/59e353052d0000971730a55b.jpeg?cache=mqJUUaVcQm&ops=1200_630 freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/bloomberg-weinstein-736x529.jpg us.v-cdn.net/5021252/uploads/editor/6t/ddhauycct47l.png external-preview.redd.it/1EDKVj9ZIO87ijRgipOpdt8i80_ni7dpfpivesrkevk.jpg?width=1024&auto=webp&s=1586ea878d02fafb8d5c927c38be4d44d0907a81 www.small-screen.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/jeffrey-epstein-with-bill-clinton.jpg eurolandexperience.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/jeffrey-epstein-with-bill-gates.jpg external-preview.redd.it/vaOjhnEj0odCffzeYZ1ApNy4HG8TfeBdpERPMLd-jbg.jpg?auto=webp&s=98e643781001593950096629168cbb7c4018bbd8 1.bp.blogspot.com/-hXn8yAFXBK8/VupXUSk2RGI/AAAAAAAATEw/Bylb-UETfbkOOLu9ufbsaxnZ-VKDlz1oQ/s320/trump-clinton.jpg bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/tulsaworld.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/9/08/9088c8ae-50fe-5664-81e3-689d037255ac/5d542acda7aea.preview.jpg?crop=1821%2C1024%2C0%2C56&resize=1120%2C630&order=crop%2Cresize vashiva.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/fact5-slider-2.jpg Head of the Snake - Wexner, Maxwell’s, Mossad & Mega Group Exposed kzbin.info/www/bejne/mquniHRvlNKIncU Blackstone Vault Epstein files www.blackstoneintel.com/epstein Ted Gunderson - Former FBI Chief Exposes 'Illuminati' (disturbing content) kzbin.info/www/bejne/e6LNf5Rjf9WmnJI TED GUNDERSON CHRONICLES kzbin.info/www/bejne/anutnot7odKibtk No Questions Asked - How the British Establishment hide child abuse kzbin.info/www/bejne/oGmVe4mkh6l8as0 The Monarchy British VIP pedophile ring for decades kzbin.info/www/bejne/npiTgYl4jsiEg8U How The British State Protects Paedophiles kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppbRfWmwgdqEfac Britain’s Pedophilia ELITE… [EXPOSED] 2018 Documentary kzbin.info/www/bejne/anzOdZKhlJmSoq8 Satanists & Pedophiles Run The World kzbin.info/www/bejne/f5izaWuwa81gkM0 THE STRANGE STORY OF THE QUEEN AND THE CHILDREN WHO ‘DISAPPEARED’ indianinthemachine.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/the-strange-story-of-the-queen-and-the-children-who-disappeared-from-native-residential-schools/ Queen Elizabeth and 10 Missing Children Truth With Trishaly kzbin.info/www/bejne/h5_OY2ahmLirgaM Queen Elizabeth Found Guilty in Missing Children Case nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2016/02/queen-elizabeth-found-guilty-in-missing.html Mass graves of Mohawk children have been uncovered by ground-penetrating radar at the Mohawk Institute, a residential school for Mohawk operated by the Church of England and the Vatican before its closure in 1970. www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican69.htm THE QUEEN AND MISSING KIDS aangirfan.blogspot.com/2011/03/queen-and-missing-kids.html Proof Queen Elizabeth killed kids in Canada! kzbin.info/www/bejne/n5uYg2iup5p7e80 No justice for Epstein accusers as Queen denies ties - Galloway kzbin.info/www/bejne/gXaYpnyNosRrntE The Origins of Jeffrey Epstein | 1971 kzbin.info/www/bejne/p5WceJWeYtpgjK8 Fall of the Cabal Revelations: Meet the Scherffs [Bush] + Meet the Hitlers [Obama] - Robert Potter kzbin.info/www/bejne/a4THmmWwg56Hg5Y You can download the book for free here www.dropbox.com/s/92kitdf2t1077o8/For%20free%20in%20booksVeil_of_Invisibility.pdf.zip?dl=0&file_subpath=%2FFor+free+in+booksVeil_of_Invisibility.pdf Meet The Scherffs www.dtss.us/blog/meet-the-scherffs/ Is George H.W. Bush Really Prescott Bush's Son? Or Is He The Son Of Inventor Nikola Tesla's German-Born Accountant, George H. Scherff, Sr.? rense.com/general69/prescc.htm This satanic blackmailing has been going on for a long time now = The Fatty Arbuckle Scandal www.neatorama.com/2017/04/14/The-Fatty-Arbuckle-Scandal/ George Washington and his "White Slaves" / Indentured in the Mt Vernon Plantation / Truth kzbin.info/www/bejne/e160qYqghcqaaaM From Indigenous American to African American // Meet The Original People of The America's kzbin.info/www/bejne/jmiaZXWkiZVoibM White Servitude // Indentured in the Penal Colonies of America / The True Middle Passage youtu.be/XExqydi7 The Truth about Abraham Lincoln // The Runaway Indentured Servant Colored Man kzbin.info/www/bejne/h3zXnI16fbiZjtk White Servitude & Free Negro Masters // The Invention of the White Race/Indentured Servitude kzbin.info/www/bejne/bmSUe4OflJmbj80 White Servitude // Convicts, Political & Religious Prisoners / Hutchison-Lambert Genealogy kzbin.info/www/bejne/onPNcn6uZ5KAhLs White Servitude & Free Negro Masters // The Untold truth of American Slavery / Indentured Service kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWnKnJx-ht53qMU Untold Ancient American Truth // Mayach/Turtle/First/Maya/Mu/Mother/Atlantis/Egypt/Amazon kzbin.info/www/bejne/nHLCYYevmKZmqtk And Then They Came for the Books... kzbin.info/www/bejne/kJDJeJmgj9eDnK8
@charliesimar75419 жыл бұрын
Every time I hear Noam Chomsky speak, I am in awe of his evident intellect. He seems to easily express thoughts and concepts which, though very deep, appear to be obvious once they are spoken.
@teresabarnes-matych6 жыл бұрын
I am an admitted Chomskyite! Many years of study, observation and deep thought are always evident when he speaks! We need him around in this day and age, especially! 🙏❤️✌️🌎🌞🌻🦋🎶🎼🌈❤️🙏
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5_OfnRmoZx0nJo Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets. I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
@zenodotusofathens21223 жыл бұрын
@@TheConstitutionFirst Indeed. These are the thoughts of Thomas Sowell. He wrote a book about intellectuals and made these points
@Sagefrakrobatik9 жыл бұрын
Could you imagine a world in which Chomsky is celebrated in our culture as much as kim Kardashian
@Andulsi6 жыл бұрын
that would be a thing
@michaelnurge16526 жыл бұрын
No. No, I can't. Unless you say "our culture" meaning educated people who actually give a damn about this place.
@apetivist6 жыл бұрын
It will never happen. America is full of anti-intellectuals.
@tar_palantir78556 жыл бұрын
yes. communism
@opirbrain92256 жыл бұрын
Don’t say anything start doing from now on
@meyerjac9 жыл бұрын
I might be the universe's biggest nerd, but when I first saw the title of this video and realized it was genuine I just about rolled around on the floor with delight.
@AlistairEwingforensic-services5 жыл бұрын
Wait till a decent copy of the Rise of Skywalker gets uploaded into torrent cyberspace.
@DeborahLagutaris4 жыл бұрын
I got an email from him once and was afraid to touch my computer for fear it would fly away
@sophocles11984 жыл бұрын
What does it mean to just about roll around on the floor?
@MikkelGrumBovin4 жыл бұрын
rolled around in your own shit
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
Marxist philosophy is just plain fun and inherently moral: This video Nails it! kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5_OfnRmoZx0nJo
@AzimuthTao9 жыл бұрын
Finally, the perfect remedy for my insomnia.
@estebannemo19579 жыл бұрын
***** Heh...Chomsky whispering in an ASMR video....look out, Maria!
@RamSadeh9 жыл бұрын
Raoul Borans Hahaha True
@DanielStarbuck9 жыл бұрын
Esteban Nemo who do you mean when referring to ASMR? I'm racking my mind to try and work out who it is but my brain fails me, it's probably the lack of sleep and stress of other things causing me to have what I can only describe as a brain fart, thanks.
@estebannemo19579 жыл бұрын
Do a search for "ASMR Maria" on KZbin.
@dahliathereader28725 жыл бұрын
Chomsky is one of the few great intellectuals who speak with grace and honestly 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@hughjarce35179 жыл бұрын
I thoroughly enjoyed that discussion. For me, the great joy of such gentle but deep discussion is available to me in my own home - I am at home in my chair but right with them. If I don't grasp a point being put forward I can stop, rewind and re approach. I can stop and think through what is being suggested or observed. How lucky are we, this generation who can observe and participate in so many debates and discussions. Chomsky is growing on me. Of course I am familiar with him but the internet allows us to pursue him throughout his life listening as he casts off pearls and thoughts over his shoulder.
@TheOldirishfan31308 жыл бұрын
Two of my heroes! The master of physics and the master of language and morality! What a treat for us to be able to listen to these two great men.
@thomasmathew13244 жыл бұрын
Is there some way to Keep this man , Chomsky, alive for another 150 years?...
@sungerbob17864 жыл бұрын
we should freeze him.
@dawidkiller4 жыл бұрын
if technological singularity happens, perhaps
@enkibumbu4 жыл бұрын
Ask Kissinger.
@anaesthesia15494 жыл бұрын
By giving him a portion of our lives!
@eul-elt20884 жыл бұрын
Apo Galiev It’s a load of crap. This book isn’t worth the media it’s propagated on. No one should waste their time even considering looking into it at all. Pure nonsense and dribble. Only the soft-minded could possibly take it seriously.
@dugdowndeepdog3 жыл бұрын
The man is brilliant. Every time I listen to him I learn something at least somewhat mind-blowing.
@atheoma2 ай бұрын
wrining this from october 2024. noam is speechless after a massive stroke but still alive and have been reportedly rehabilitating. his intellectual weight and contribution to the society are enormous. long live dr. chomsky. your voice is missed badly 💔
@swarsur9 жыл бұрын
Prof. Noam Chomsky - what a fascinating and remarkable intellect !!!
@sirousmohseni44 жыл бұрын
Brilliant ideas and these two guys are source of them. Long life for you two to shed more light on our minds.
@BolasDaGrk5 жыл бұрын
1:27:32 "It happens because we're supporting it." That statement could not be more correct. Every fault in our society, is due to society, not individuals. Each individual should take personal responsibility, so our systems put in place can function successfully.
@bestpolicymusic42314 жыл бұрын
Chomsky is so soft-spoken, keeping his mic from feeding back was clearly an ongoing challenge to some engineer.
@You_Dont_Like_My_Music9 жыл бұрын
This is the best discussion with Chomsky I 've ever seen or read. Thanks for sharing.
@amypellegrini17325 жыл бұрын
Oh, I just wish there was an audio engineer capable of getting the audio right for events like these.
@christylake29604 жыл бұрын
Rude
@Robert_McGarry_Poems3 жыл бұрын
That's just his voice, not the microphone. Hey, maybe they should run his audio through garage band and filter it with auto tune.
@mrseaturtle89159 жыл бұрын
Amazing to see these two fine men on a stage together. Chomsky still has his dry wit. I don't recall see him giggle as much before either; endearing. Krauss has the wherewithal to pair with Noam, and challenge someone he has respect for. GREAT POST.
@dreamingrightnow11744 жыл бұрын
Okay, but can you say someone like Krauss with his sexual assault/harassment allegations a "fine" man? He's lucky to be on the stage with NC.
@robertransley54779 жыл бұрын
Lower the gain on the sound desk and kill the feedback or find the frequency and lower it!!!
@donluchitti9 жыл бұрын
massive dissapointment with the sound for the first 45 minutes... I mean seriously, on THIS show? Whoever was working the sound should be ashamed professionally.
@AsFewFalseThingsAsPossible9 жыл бұрын
Robert Ransley There must be some standard settings for the two mics here in this theatre, not a complex arrangement !
@donluchitti9 жыл бұрын
AsFewFalseThingsAsPossible I think the problem mighta been that they had the levels turned up because Chomsky speaks so softly, would that have caused the feedback?
@waynek.massey87299 жыл бұрын
How can no one running sound at a university think about throwing an EQ on the mic?
@lindonpeasley24699 жыл бұрын
Exactly, the trouble starts when Chomsky comes out, he speaks so softly. Soundguys nightmare. But no excuse.
@frost19479 жыл бұрын
"Man is born free and everywhere is in chains" a quote by Jean-Jacque Rousseau and is the correct quote.
@center__mass3 жыл бұрын
My new hobby is listening to science lectures while going to sleep. How lucky are we to have such access to these discussions and debates with the academics of the times. Thanks very much🤙 And i totally agree with the comments laurence is a remarkable moderator.
@mikerocketmusic2 жыл бұрын
For some of us this may actually be the best way of learning, perhaps the new future of education for some….
@MarvinMonroe2 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's great, I do the same thing. Also, Terrence McKenna lectures are great to listen to at bedtime. The Trialogue Series with Sheldrake and Abraham is really great also
@AndiLevicky9 жыл бұрын
I was afraid all the comments here would be very earnest and intellectual. I'm so glad to see that, as with all youtube videos, it's mostly rants and insults.
@azchris19796 жыл бұрын
@andi Levicky ...and sarcasm. lol.
@frankdeville5156 жыл бұрын
You just added sarcasm to the list.
@samerdrich55795 жыл бұрын
Aside form politics, can anyone tell me why is Chomsky so admired? I doubt that his followers understand his work on linguistics, so I suspect the admiration comes from Chomsky's political stance.
@gg_rider5 жыл бұрын
@@samerdrich5579 Not just his stance(s). John Kerry criticized Bush's war. Heck, Donald Trump used the mass-rejection, late arriving, of Bush's war, to attack Jeb so he couldn't win on the coattails of his younger brother. Chomsky provides analysis, mostly factual, about US and Western violent interventions, by so called liberal intellectuals, and covert ops that became known.
@samerdrich55795 жыл бұрын
@@gg_rider My point is proved, I said "asides from politics" and no one has been able to answer so far.
@TheSilkroadvideo8 жыл бұрын
Excellent//thanks Lawrence for this great dialogue..
@waindayoungthain21479 жыл бұрын
Pay my homage to you ,Noam👏. Your words and smiles, give the way to go to find the best we can!👏🙏The hope, no hopeless at all!
@paxdriver9 жыл бұрын
"what's more obscene is that we don't talk about it" - on our part in genocide and war crimes.
@yassertm66663 жыл бұрын
To see the amount of truth and wisdom come from his mouth make me believe once more in humanity and the precise goal of being an intellectuals is to speak the truth , honesty so you can touch the souls of victims of war crimes and send condolences in defending them by telling the truth , thank you Naom chomosky from IRAQ , baghdad
@paifu.4 жыл бұрын
Hey big respect to the people involved in putting a screen up for people who have hearing disabilities
@Hecatonicosachoron9 жыл бұрын
Such a great discussion. Thank you so much for capturing and uploading it. I was very pleasantly surprised when it showed up in my subscription feed. It is now depriving me from sleep though!
@acerbicatheist28937 жыл бұрын
DEPRIVING?? It (or rather Chomsky) made me doze of even though I didn't want to.
@will79099 жыл бұрын
Absolutely my favorite Chomsky talk. Its like an overall summary of his best work and ideas. All in under 2 hours.
@mikebtko7 жыл бұрын
Will Griffin Anytime you got an old athiest jew circuit speaker like Chomsky spinning yarns about everything under the sun except jewish usury caste system. You got an old jew shekeler...
@markcarey679 жыл бұрын
"man was born free but lives everywhere in chains" was the quote, Lawrence
@nouha19953 жыл бұрын
Same meaning...
@KC1989ify2 жыл бұрын
Love the content but why in lots of these videos can they not sort the sound out in advance? It's hard to listen to them without hearing all the high frequencies being swept and having a constant frequency ringing as they speak.
@DanLackey9 жыл бұрын
A really, really productive and illuminating exchange. How nice to see how Krauss, the great cosmo-monologist, submits to the true discipline of interviewing, tapping into Chomsky's mind with the just the right questions, knowing when to defer, when to challenge.
@acerbicatheist28937 жыл бұрын
He's not giving a physics lecture here, oddly enough... And may I ask just what the fuck he's supposed to do, being a cosmologist, but monologue on cosmology? That's his job...and I'd rather have my fingernails pulled off than listen to Chomsky for 2 more minutes, since even on his own subject he's soporific when he's not being inaccurate, or even downright bloodless.
@incollectio9 жыл бұрын
Too bad about the sound problems at the beginning, they were somewhat distracting. If anyone is wondering, they get finally resolved around 26:50 mark when new microphones are brought in. Other than that, I did enjoy watching this, although it was more of an interview than a dialogue. But I guess in this case that's okay. ;)
@That_one-guy1924 жыл бұрын
That has to be the most beautiful introduction I have ever heard.
@bumbleWeaver9 жыл бұрын
I love watching Krauss act towards Noam, the same way I act when watching Krauss!
@Jimyblues4 жыл бұрын
Me tooooo
@dhgfffhcdujhv56435 жыл бұрын
I have watched this 3 times now and im still fascinated.
@lynnlynn13172 жыл бұрын
kzbin.infojvs2FZlJguQ👈🏻👈🏻👌👌
@ladykatnip76982 жыл бұрын
This was a great conversation. I wasn't aware that Noam was also interested in science because I have been living under a rock for a decade. He explains the connections between linguistics, behavioral science, and physics so concisely. Sometimes people think I am not paying attention because I seem to get lost in thought but in the truth I am just busying processing their words and picking apart their internal process. Which may stem from my years editing. I think the words people choose out of all the probabilities of word order are interesting. One just has to be careful not to jump to conclusions and to not make a defined judgement based on their interpretation of what those choices mean because there are always exceptions, lost in translations, and bias.
@Bestietvcute9 жыл бұрын
Thank You !!! for this amazing interview I feel that my mind just got an overdose of logic and coherent thoughts very refreshing
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5_OfnRmoZx0nJo Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets. I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
@thejimmydoreshow5 жыл бұрын
I'm guessing they didn't have a union sound man on this shoot. Holy shit, what an amateur job on audio.
@neosapien2474 жыл бұрын
How did it feel when your girl Tulsi endorsed Biden?
@TheAthertonian4 жыл бұрын
A big fault with many KZbin videos. Couldn’t KZbin develop some algorithm to modulate soundto a a standard level?
@thomashenderson50474 жыл бұрын
Commie
@mattyspaghetti4494 жыл бұрын
I completely agree. There are multiple rings, build ups and actual fucking feedback the whole fucking time.
@MikkelGrumBovin4 жыл бұрын
@@thomashenderson5047 nontalent
@nowhereman83747 жыл бұрын
Out spoken intellect, how refreshing in this dark time
@bencherkizakaria8635 Жыл бұрын
Can you tell us the name of the book you are discussing for god sake? i mean i looked in the comments and in the intro don't find anything
@medicuswashington9870 Жыл бұрын
I am grateful to Professor Noam Chomsky for informing me of United States diplomat George Kennan decision in 1947 to allow war torn Europe and European settler colonizers to rebuild on the back of Africa. I appreciate all that he has done. Professor Noam Chomskys information enabled me to better understand my reality.
@robertcurtis31155 жыл бұрын
Can you imagine twenty five minutes in still getting ringing from the sound person?! If you book Noam, book a sound person that can handle him.
@waindayoungthain21479 жыл бұрын
To know within yourself before knowing any others! We are human beings!
@jakelacey43508 жыл бұрын
Lawrence needs a shirt that says "we'll get to that" lol
@alwynsam53495 жыл бұрын
:D
@MikkelGrumBovin4 жыл бұрын
he needs a shirt that says "Pedophile conman"
@Robert_McGarry_Poems3 жыл бұрын
@@MikkelGrumBovin self project much?
@franciscomendoza77654 жыл бұрын
2 of my greatest teachers in the world!
@watanglipuhadjar26543 жыл бұрын
i am very lucky to be able to watch his discussion on this channel. I just want to underline his last statement that : "we have to make a distinction here between individual rasionality and the institutional rasionality" and his views on today's climate change issue: "you don't have to be a climate scientist to understand this much about what's going on" very thoughtful and enlightening. understanding his thoughts requires a clear thinking and understanding the context of the discussion. may he always be given health. 🤲🙏🏼
@voidofambition9 жыл бұрын
Chomsky's point about leaving out theatrics in speech is something I've always believed in. If you're trying to teach, leave any charisma or eloquence out of it. These are nothing more but emotional appeals. That isn't teaching, it's manipulating.
@MaggotDiggo17 жыл бұрын
Rather ironic he would say that. It's rather clear that he uses a great deal of theatrics, charisma and appeal to peoples emotions, to make his point. I doubt he lacks the self awareness to see this.
@Sssvvvgggwww6 жыл бұрын
Ian Escobar I disagree. I recently had the most boring lectures with an old professor who was pretty much talking to himself about theory of literature (my kinda thing) with monotone voice and no "theathre" and I literally remember nothing. I was sleeping. But maybe he wasn't just good in verbalizing his thoughts and then a very energetic, quick, intense and fun lectures with another professor about cognitive and generative grammar (not my kinda thing, but not anymore) and I was so exited about this topic. I think you need to find a nice balance between not being "too much" and being boring to death.
@Astrobradbury6 жыл бұрын
Obviously you have never seen Richard Feynman teaching.
@belindagagelman72816 жыл бұрын
Ian Escobar : Preacher tactics, indeed!
@hauntyoo5 жыл бұрын
Me too, when I started to listen to Chomsky, it was really painful, cuz I was used to listen to charismatic speakers like Hitchens. But as time went on, I have learned so much more than I ever could. I learned to actually get interested in the words and the subject, and not the speaker. Listening to Chomsky speak, it's like listening him reading a book.
@VeganSemihCyprus337 жыл бұрын
Everyone should watch this discussion, every single person should know those issues.
@olea.endresen34739 жыл бұрын
So this is perhaps the most interesting thing I've ever seen on youtube!
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
Marxist philosophy is just plain fun and inherently moral: This video Nails it! kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5_OfnRmoZx0nJo
@georgekraft14016 жыл бұрын
Dear Shirley, I don't know who you are, but thank you for uploading this conversation.
@TheCriticsAreRaving8 жыл бұрын
One of the greatest videos on KZbin.
@lynnlynn13172 жыл бұрын
kzbin.infojvs2FZlJguQ👈🏻👈🏻🤔🤔
@TakeTheRedPill_Now9 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for sharing this.
@PatySeti20246 жыл бұрын
A million thanks to Lawrence Krauss for this extraordinary dialogue with one of the most admirable, brilliant, and advanced humanists ever!!
could you put ShileyFilms this video with spanish subtitle? or the option to automatic youtube translation? is very hard as a english secon language understand most of it. Thanks!
@bjarnesegaard57019 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing these awsome videos with these great guys.
@estebannemo19579 жыл бұрын
On topics I know something about, like the Taliban, I take what Chomsky says with a grain of salt. The Taliban were created by the Pakistani ISI. Taliban religious ideology, influenced heavily by Deobandi and so-called Wahabi dogma, is foreign to Afghans as well. The Taliban also destroyed the tribal system of consensus and eliminated the traditional role of women in Afghan society. The Taliban never controlled all of Afghanistan, either. (Their counterparts, The Northern Alliance eventually drove them out of Kabul, not US troops) The Taliban gave open support to bin Laden to set up terrorist training camps in Afghanistan, knowing full well UBL's enmity towards the West and the US. And then there is their horrible human rights record, and the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas. Does anyone really think the Taliban would have been fair-minded and reasonable negotiators? Yet in spite of all this, Chomsky reacts in mock puzzlement at the US not taking their "offer" to turn over bin Laden seriously. As if the Taliban had the political or moral authority or will to do such a thing. I follow Chomsky, but cannot agree with him here. His one-size-fits-all argument about the US being the progenitor of every conflict in the world comes off as a default response.
@adamwatson76699 жыл бұрын
Esteban Nemo Where did Chomsky state that the US was the progenitor of every conflict in the world?
@okaro65959 жыл бұрын
Esteban Nemo Condemning U.S. attack on Afghanistan in 2001 is like condemning U.S. attack on France in 1944. Some people have a view that if U.S. intervenes in something, everything that follows is their fault. If the U.S. does not intervene (like in Rwanda) then everything also is their fault. Some actually blame U.S: on what ISIS does.
@adamwatson76699 жыл бұрын
***** "Condemning U.S. attack on Afghanistan in 2001 is like condemning U.S. attack on France in 1944." It's really not. At all. You could make a case that the US invasion of Normandy was justified. You cannot make the same case with the US invasion of Afghanistan, which was totally unjustified.
@estebannemo19579 жыл бұрын
Well, it's an interesting analogy (though not one I would have made) and I think there are parallels, but really, it was the Northern Alliance, the Afghans themselves, that overthrew the Taliban, not US troops. America deployed limited special forces during the invasion and provided the Northern Alliance with air support and artillery. But getting back to the WW2 analogy, in a sense Afghanistan was liberated during the 2001 invasion as France was back during D-Day. At least we can say 15 million Afghans were liberated that day- the female population.
@DoggoWillink9 жыл бұрын
+Adam Watson Provide an argument for "totally unjustified", because you're just making assertions and nothing more.
@tonyhill89635 жыл бұрын
Lesson here is: dont go to ASU for sound production.
@astroyatin4 жыл бұрын
lack of knowledge expose armin nawabi kzbin.info/www/bejne/bHTKe6ilrLGJqMU
@LagmasterB4 жыл бұрын
It’s ASU. You go for the booze and the girls
@babulsarwar37145 жыл бұрын
Noam - most respectable living intellectual in the universe.
@InCog20209 жыл бұрын
I'm glad I can actually hear Noam in this video. So often he seems to mumble and speak so softly that I have to turn the volume all the way up and quickly lower it whenever anyone else begins to speak.
@RafaelQuirinoVex3 жыл бұрын
Im only passed Chomsky's introduction, and i already have the goose bumps !
@sociallyconscientous9 жыл бұрын
There is not enough that I can say about Noam Chomsky that can trump the plaudits bestowed on him. This video was recently shot at ASU as part of a series hosted and led by Lawrence Krauss, himself not just a noted physicist, but a public intellectual as well. If you believe that there is another way for the world to revolve than the out of control spin set in motion by the current global and economic crisis, then you must avail yourself of this interview, done in two parts, the first of which is linked here. Chomsky is a "public intellectual", a term he deserves. However, he is not your average snooty, ten dollar word upper crust sort, and that is really part of what makes him different, and his thoughts accessible. He does not get enough credit for the manner in which he communicates, the attractiveness of his logic, and the common sense that his opinions reflect. If you are attracted to what he has to say, and you feel as I do about his style of rhetoric, I highly recommend that you encourage others with concerns about the future of the world we live in, to put aside their initial abhorrence of the word intellectual, and their hatred for elitism, and just listen for five minutes to what he has to say. Chomsky's words need to be proliferated far beyond the world of the already converted. He needs to be heard by the masses of people who are the power base on which change can evolve.
@jonnymahony94029 жыл бұрын
I really liked it that Krauss did this discussion. I bet Krauss has many followers who have never heard of Chomsky, so I'm glad he did it. And good that he didn't turned it into an endless discussion about religion.
@sociallyconscientous9 жыл бұрын
I'll second your comments on both counts. Krauss, as a "star" of the ASU series, does a great job with his discussion approach to bringing out the ideas of those who sit in the chair next to him on stage. One admonition of course, and that is that he has guests on who he admires so there isn't a sense that you have to brace yourself hard for the antagonistic question that you think may be coming. After all, he's talking to a friend, and that friend has good, solid and meaningful things to say. So it just seems to flow with Krauss's approach. And yes, let us not put that threadbare discussion of religion on the docket. There are plenty of other opportunities to air out the scientists grievances against religion.
@MattSingh19 жыл бұрын
George Aponick Christopher Hitchens on Chomsky: '[Chomsky] has now been impeached by his own standards, since scrutiny of the evidence does not bear him out on Serbia or Afghanistan or Iraq. It didn't bear him out on Cambodia either, though he was never a "Holocaust denier" or anything like it. And he has, I think, ceased to be of any use to young people who might pardonably doubt the official story.' 'My quarrel with Chomsky goes back to the Balkan wars of the 1990s, where he more or less openly represented the "Serbian Socialist Party" (actually the national-socialist and expansionist dictatorship of Slobodan Milosevic) as the victim. Many of us are proud of having helped organize to prevent the slaughter and deportation of Europe's oldest and largest and most tolerant Muslim minority, in Bosnia-Herzegovina and in Kosovo. But at that time, when they were real, Chomsky wasn't apparently interested in Muslim grievances. He only became a voice for that when the Taliban and Al Qaeda needed to be represented in their turn as the victims of a "silent genocide" in Afghanistan. Let me put it like this, if a supposed scholar takes the Christian-Orthodox side when it is the aggressor, and then switches to taking the "Muslim" side when Muslims commit mass murder, I think that there is something very nasty going on. And yes, I don't think it is exaggerated to describe that nastiness as "anti-American" when the power that stops and punishes both aggressions is the United States … In some awful way, his regard for the underdog has mutated into support for mad dogs. This is not at all like watching the implosion of an obvious huckster and jerk like Michael Moore, who would have made a perfectly good Brownshirt populist. The collapse of Chomsky feels to me more like tragedy'
@jonnymahony94029 жыл бұрын
Matthew Singh-Dosanjh Chomsky > Hitchens on every level.
@sociallyconscientous9 жыл бұрын
Matthew Singh-Dosanjh Thank you for the insight you presented quoting Christopher Hitchens who I also admire for the intellect and insight he displayed during his tragically shortened life. That said, nobody is perfect in their representations or perceptions about complex international issues. I certainly will follow up on this quote and research it in its larger context. There are a couple responses I'd like to present. First, Hitchens let me down when he evolved out of his socialist positions. He also disappointed me when he supported the criminal invasion of Iraq. He declared that we were somehow saving the Middle East from a savage dictator. I opposed the war from the beginning and wrote that it would be the disaster it turned out to be for all peoples of the area. I've not been to Iraq but I have been to the West Bank and I was appalled by the mistreatment of Arab Muslims at the hands of a government supported by the U.S. and I would then suppose, Christopher Hitchens. One other comment, and I suppose more of a question, and I would like to know, after following Chomsky, what is your opinion generally of Chomsky's views on the world we live in and the problems we face. I'm not presenting the question as a challenge, but rather an honest want of trying to understanding of your points of view. I hope you are able to read this and respond.
@smilo_don5 жыл бұрын
How can a professional setting like this, where the thing they say are the most important, have such bad audio? I hope it wasn't this bad for the live audience.
@brendontucker63006 жыл бұрын
What I would do to be in that room with these amazing intellectuals!
@harryf27054 жыл бұрын
Here’s a novel idea, QUESTION them.
@michaelb1779 жыл бұрын
Best public intellectual alive....hands down!!
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5_OfnRmoZx0nJo Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets. I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
@AnneAdametz4 жыл бұрын
Found Noam through the movie "Captain Fantastic" one of my all time faves. This is amazing, thank you.
@samuelgaldieri82126 жыл бұрын
I love listening to Chomsky speak, such a deep intellectual old spirit
@ASkepticalHumanOnYouTube8 жыл бұрын
Chomsky and Krauss? What the fuck?! I would have never imagined these two on stage together. This is going to be good!
@raginald7mars4087 жыл бұрын
how can he - he is too large...
@rowdy.rockers7 жыл бұрын
A Skeptical Human * Apparently, Chomski was one of Krauss' professors.
@abowlofsalad88126 жыл бұрын
I was surprised the universe didn’t explode when these two met.
@kengilliland7279 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this much needed Scientific Discussion !
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5_OfnRmoZx0nJo Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets. I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
@FOOTBALLEDITZ-17134 жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky responded to an email I sent and then again to another. He was kind and clear and it was awesome!
@shenendoahh6 жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky, as usual, contributes some very valuable insights in this talk. He can be extremely critical of U.S. policy--because it is often very ugly--tho many just refuse to aknowledge this truth, prefering to believe the RA RA USA stuff they heard in youth. And I am glad to see that Lawrence Krauss is alive to these issues.
@chuckturchick83429 жыл бұрын
At 1:22:30, Chomsky says ISIS didn't come from nowhere, but rather from our invasion of Iraq, which was "imposing sectarian divisions that barely existed." Could someone please explain to me, an opponent of our invasion of Iraq from the very beginning, how we "imposed" sectarian divisions, and how these divisions had not previously existed for hundreds of years and were still there in a dormant form?
@chuckturchick83429 жыл бұрын
Chuck Turchick I didn't mean that Iraq was "imposing sectarian divisions...," but that Chomsky said our invasion of Iraq was what imposed these sectarian divisions.
@pureenergy50516 жыл бұрын
Chuck The overall definition of secularism is to divide church from state. I don't understand when you say "how these divisions had not previously existed for hundreds of years and were still there in a dormant form". So the dormant form must have come about before the hundreds of years when those divisions had not previously existed. If America imposed sectarian divisions it is only because they want no morality to get in the way of their killing millions of people. They want to divide the state from the religion. Otherwise, Iraq was about the taking of resources, just like every other false flag that the nazis, called the american government, have created just before each war.
@thomasbye43396 жыл бұрын
And you are?
@AllOtherNamesUsed6 жыл бұрын
This is one of the subjects Chomsky gets correct. He's referring to the Yinon Plan (1982) to destabilize the region along sectarian, religious and ethnic lines picked up by the Neocons and modified in Richard Perle's Clean Break report and later thinly disguised in the PNAC plan running America foreign policy in the middle east (which has been designed by Israel since 1967 according to Yitzhak Rabin); funding and supporting radicals like Al Qaeda and ISIS is essential to this and it's well known now America and allies are doing this now in Syria (as of Sept 19, 2018). This project for 'Greater Israel' is based on a rabbinic interpretation of the land promised to Abraham's seed (Gen 15.18) and misapplied to themselves rather than the messiah whom they reject, Yeshua Jesus and therefore those in covenant with Him (cf Ps 118.22, Mat 21.42ff, Gal 3.16-19, Rom 9.8, Hos 1.9-10)
@ryanfranks94416 жыл бұрын
Yeah, Chomsky isn't well thought out on Islamic states and their problems. Even when it comes to human perceptions, he discounts Richard Dawkins work by making a strawman of Richards coined term "Meme". Chomsky is B-level when it comes to the study of the propagation of useful communicable strategies in social-cultural structures (meme-idea survival).
@mad_cat_1st9 жыл бұрын
It's amazing (or self-evident) that intellectuals like these two guys are never an important part of the political "process". Noam Chomsky has written 100+ books on the subject, and is roundly criticized and/or dismissed when the forum is political. If intellect and open-mindedness became an important part of our public discourse, then an AMAZING culture could be realized in the USA. Everyone is so busy with "one-upmanship" and how much fucking MONEY can you earn, that being a thinking human being doesn't matter anymore. This sort of interview/debate/lecture CONVERSATION should be mandatory viewing for everyone who is registered to vote. We might be able to weed out the scum that don't deserve an elected "office". If you can't comprehend what great minds are talking about, then you don't HAVE a great mind and shouldn't be able to LEAD what you can't follow.
@charleswettish87012 жыл бұрын
I'm 58 and I remember that, in high-school, a solid 50% of all kids (and their parents) believed that reading, learning, knowledge, science, art, and intellectualism in general, was decidedly "uncool". These people never changed their attitudes, they still believe "thinking" is uncool, but they back candidates, in a cult of personality fashion, and vote.
@mad_cat_1st2 жыл бұрын
@@charleswettish8701 I'm 56, and pleasantly surprised that you replied to something I posted 7 years ago. Thanks.
@charleswettish87012 жыл бұрын
@@mad_cat_1stHonestly, I hadn't noticed the date, but I certainly would have replied anyway. In the intervening years, we've seen how correct you were, 7 years ago. :)
@grsiva9 жыл бұрын
Fantastic! Thank you for sharing.
@webstertippingpoint5725 жыл бұрын
So much respect from a Krauss to Noam, very touching.
@chemblah49 жыл бұрын
Can anyone tell me what Chomsky says at 1:08:30-31ish? It looks like he says something incredibly controversial and the mic (or more likely audio) cuts out for a second while he talks. What is it that we aren't supposed to hear? Here's the part I'm talking about "... but for people like us, you know [***], people who've gone through college..." What is being silenced in that brief *** second?
@thegeorge506 жыл бұрын
I wonder if Noam knows the "woah" moments his listeners have, he doesnt seem to be schooling you. Hes always so humble like having a casual conversation lol
@kartik_adhia4 жыл бұрын
He's a linguist and expert communicator. I bet he does.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems3 жыл бұрын
He reads almost every academic book printed. That keeps him pretty busy, I bet. The joke Krause made at the beginning. I had to read five books a night for a week, just to feel comfortable coming into this talk. That's the base line for a conversation, let alone keeping up with him. Look at those notes.
@scottmerrick98159 жыл бұрын
Please make sure the folks running sound get the training they need or are replaced with folks that know what they're doing.
@TheConstitutionFirst4 жыл бұрын
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5_OfnRmoZx0nJo Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets. I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
@KeskinCookin4 жыл бұрын
“We’ll get to that.” Did he? Did I miss it? Okay! I’ll watch the second part.
@MariaJose-tl4pz3 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much Chomsky and Krauss for this great Project by understanding , culture, creativity.......thanks! 💮☎️🎋🌻🧭
@Jimyblues4 жыл бұрын
This is just great thanks for posting - along with Hitchens Harris Dawkins when he’s not being exasperating, Bart Erdmann Bishop Spong these 2 are my faves and experiencing them together having a real dialogue just f in makes me happy . The perfect thing to watch after a bowl of Nightmare Cookie nugs!
@BristolEngland4 жыл бұрын
Such a wonderful man 😇 They don’t make men like this anymore!