Chris Stuckmann REFUSES to Criticize Madame Web!!! | Defends Hollywood Film Makers

Film Critic Chris Stuckmann gives his NON REVIEW of Madem Web (2024)
Stuckmann REFUSES to Criticize the Madame Web Movie, and chooses instead to put all the blame on Sony Pictures and Defend the Film Maker/Director SJ Clarkson. Pats himself on the back about how he is a POSITIVE voice in the industry. And how film makers are victims of evil movie studios/corporations. Clearly he did not like the movie, but due to him constantly submitting movie scripts to Hollywood... He obviously cannot criticize any Hollywood Projects in fear that he will burn some of those bridges! Truly a pathetic display. Thank you as always for watching! Make sure to please like, subscribe, and comment below!
Twitter: / bgrizzy1989
TikTok: / grizzy1989
Rumble: rumble.com/c/B...
•Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

[@RyuShinkuuHadoken]

Imagine Gordon Ramsey unable to criticize food or restaurants because he knows how difficult it is to prepare it or how hard it is to run a restaurant.

[@tyrannozilla]

"YOU F$%KING DONKEY!"

[@justaguywholikespie8221]

LMFAO

[@jennycoyle8204]

This is the perfect way to explain the situation

[@luccirobbins6675]

Chris Stuckman is no Gordon Ramsey.

[@beloved-child]

LOL PERFECT ANALOGY

[@VirtualSatyr]

The funniest thing about this. Chris Stuckman: I won't say anything bad about movies. I'll only talk about the good things. Also Chris Stuckman: I have nothing to say about Madame Web. That's probably the most damaging review out there.

[@christopherfoley8322]

@@steveblundell7766 when he was talking about star trek, he had no problems shitting all over Star trek 5 in one sentence by saying "Star trek 5 sucked, it was my least favorite" yes, it did suck, and its pretty much everybody's least favorite, but he could have said at least something positive like "it was the movie before the undiscovered country, so it has that going for it"

[@jamietuggnut3312]

@@steveblundell7766 That review is 4 years old, isn't it? He's only recently got all sensitive after he is announced he is making a movie, and, oh, yeah, he's also "pansexual." 😅

[@captainmarvelwilson508]

@@jamietuggnut3312Pansexual? Who cares?

[@jamietuggnut3312]

@@captainmarvelwilson508 Calm down, Mr. Swallows...Obviously, it was important enough for Chris Stuckmann to announce it to the world, so don't blame me for just repeating it. 😂

[@NigelThrashner]

@@jamietuggnut3312you said it like it’s even relevant to the discussion

[@kaiserofgermania5236]

The old Chris Stuckmann would've made a hilariocity out of this movie

[@lancethefilmguy9392]

That's what I was gonna say

[@kpopattack01]

Yes, i unsubcribe him because he stop doing that

[@kaiserofgermania5236]

@@kpopattack01 It really sucks. Not only was he funny, but he had way more charisma back then. Now he always seems sleepy.

[@douglasammirati8450]

The old Chris Stuckmann would've made a hilariocity out of modern Chris Stuckmann.

[@kasapkrvnik7799]

@@douglasammirati8450 haha :)

[@lancelot2833]

Bro his literal defense is "you don't know how hard it is to make a movie so you can't criticize it"

[@Adam-sd2ow]

Hired purely for being a woman or minority and given opportunities they lack the skill and experience to do. Yeah they're such victims, my heart breaks.

[@Cloudaddy220]

"You're not a chef so you can't criticize the meal you paid money for"

[@rhysproudmourne1646]

If you don't like something, you can't criticize it. Lol, sure, the soyboys that watch Stuckman criticize everything under the sun constantly except big companies, the thing that needs criticism. Stuckman only criticized Sony because it isn't Disney. Otherwise he would balloon around with his garbage opinion without ever landing, probably criticizing the fanbase instead.

[@Adam-sd2ow]

@@Cloudaddy220 I said similar. Absolute clown cop out.

[@supereldinho]

This coming from the guy who tried to "fix" Batman V Superman's terrible script, only to deliver such meme-worthy gems like "tell that to Zod's snapped neck". His debating skills are on par with his writing chops.

[@AzenzoNe]

Said it before, but I'm still surprised by how much of bootlicker he has become.

[@MellowMutant]

Sad but true

[@toddbrown242]

Wait, was he ever a decent film critic? I've only know of him for like 3-4 years and he's always been a clown with absolutely zero substance. My brain can't fathom the idea of him ever producing any insightful content.

[@MalcomMalediction]

he has always been sht i never watch his woketarded reviews

[@Unicornpirate]

@@toddbrown242 He was decent in the mid 2010's. It was always him and Jeremy Jahns for movie reviews. Then you had Collider at the time doing decent things as well. But it all fell from grace. Collider went full woke with John Campea, John Rocha, Kris Harloff, etc. Stuckmann became garbage after 2016 with his Ghostbusters 2016 "review". I think TDS affected all of these people around 2016. Then you had the rise of excellent channels like Geeks and Gamers, Nerdrotic, Young Rippa, Ryan Kinel, Critical Drinker putting those channels to shame. Jeremy Jahns is still excellent though.

[@lukeskywalker6809]

He has “come out” as a pansexual. :D

[@RogueFox2185]

If Chris was hired by Hollywood to make a movie, chances are not only would it end up bombing but he would also immediately go blaming the audience for why it flopped instead of reflecting on his mistakes.

[@natechenry]

Hypocrite at its best

[@moonmyers2608]

But he’s literally made a movie dipshit

[@idiot_city5444]

Couldn't agree more

[@Snowqueenelsaofficial992]

Yup pretty much everyone in Hollywood rn

[@Snowqueenelsaofficial992]

Chris Stinkman can't criticize this movie because the women are stunning and brave and empowered

[@mr.punisher5100]

Imagine you're in a shill competition and your opponent is Chris Stuckmann

[@unseenmarauder]

(Vince McMahon face)

[@mayorjimmy]

Grace Randolph accepts your challenge.

[@user-ug6bk4fx8m]

I think he's a robot🤖

[@MarkusNabokov]

@@user-ug6bk4fx8m He IS. A weird looking one too.

[@madlad1741]

I would say Doomblazer

[@evi4128]

I noticed as soon as he started trying to be a director, he started to have this complex about how he doesn't' like putting down movies. I immediately knew this was the wrong direction to take. Literally a film critic who refuses to give his opinion if its not good. What a simp.

[@Adam-sd2ow]

Francois Truffaut started out as a critic, quite a harsh one and then became one of the most respected directors of all time. Stuckman is just a blockbuster shill.

[@evi4128]

@@Adam-sd2ow Yea i think to be a successful director you have to be all in, unapologetic and extremely confident in yourself with no fucks given. Stuckmann lacks the grit needed.

[@willcommon6164]

people are so fucking dramamatic hahahah

[@evi4128]

@@willcommon6164 i mean not as dramatic as you cursing somone out, calling them dramatic and laughing at your own joke like a comic book villain, but go on.

[@philfedora495]

He's just turned himself into a canary. If he doesnt review it then its shit. Congratulations, he's played himself.

[@sexistspaghettios]

And even when he does review it It's still shit.

[@ibnmianal-buna3176]

@@sexistspaghettios Remember his glowing review of Indy 5?

[@jonascastejon5888]

​@@notmyrealhandleThat's not a valid argument however. It's his job to review bad movies where there's little to nothing good to say about it. The point is he's not reviewing it out altruism but rather self-interest of being part of the Hollywood establishment apparently (good luck with that) and that makes his "reasons" all the more insincere and disingenuous. Basically is just a facade.

[@everythingisawesome2903]

​​@@notmyrealhandleIf he can't review bad movies, then he shouldn't review good movies, either cause there is no point of watching him when he's only gonna post the reviews of the movies he like. There is no suspense, no anticipation in his reviews anymore.

[@thehedgehognerd]

Yeah, because he doesn't want to review a bad movie. Yeah...TRULLY PLAYED HIMSELF LOL.

[@silastipton9982]

Chris have you ever considered that some people are just really bad at making movies

[@SirFrasier5]

has this dude ever considered that writers are capable of being incompetent

[@liamphibia]

God I do not want to know what his film Shelby Oaks will be like.

[@jeremyusreevu237]

"NO! EVERY SINGLE DIRECTOR IS AMAZING AT MAKING MOVIES, AND SHOULD NOT BE CRITISIZED AT ALL! TOMMY WISEAU, JAMES NGUYEN, DEREK SAVAGE, M. NIGHT SHAMYLAN, AND UWE BOLL? WHO ARE THEY?!"

[@danny90099]

He only need to look in the mirror . Mf wait for Hollywoid phone call

[@OhNoAlexxStreams]

Guys! These are *_”artists”_* 🤡

[@liamphibia]

Chris Stuckmann? More like, Chris *Shillmann.*

[@Shitty_Pickle]

Cuckmann.

[@Mbscott96]

Clever

[@tyrannozilla]

How bout Chrissy McStuckma'am?

[@liamphibia]

@@tyrannozilla 😂😂😂😂

[@tyrannozilla]

Thanks.@@liamphibia

[@danielsdimension7828]

It stinks how far Chris has fallen. I remember watching him when I was younger.

[@rockys201]

I unsubbed from Stuckmann a year or two ago because I value honesty and integrity, of which he obviously has none and probably never had. Thankfully he's got a well earned reputation for being a liar

[@mrgrizzy1989]

I think I watched him once and thought he was boring AF lol. Then went back to him when I started this channel just to rip him 😆

[@Mark_Knight]

I remember I used to watch Chris, but then around The Last Jedi he actually gave it a positive review. I am not biased and honest, but I KNEW that movie sucked and I realized around then youtubers were simply mouth pieces, especially those who have that Soy look, that soy opinions, and that soy face.,

[@rockys201]

@@mrgrizzy1989 he's basically another generic YT film reviewer who offers nothing unique or interesting, least of all his ultra dull personality. One video of his which I thought had some merit was the one where he talks about annoying moviegoers, it had a fair bit of momentum and I enjoyed his story. His reviews themselves were much less entertaining though, and I even decided to watch a few films that he recommended to sometimes wonder what drugs he was on to like them in the first place. As you mentioned, I don't think he has the talent to make it as a top filmmaker, and he's now failed at his basic reviewing career when he refuses to give negative reviews(whatever the hell he means by that)

[@rogerhalt3991]

Head on over the Drinker and Nerdrotic for unbiased reviews.

[@rockys201]

@@rogerhalt3991 oh I do. The Drinker never disappoints, lol

[@Arcjaw]

If you look at his eyes you'll notice he looks completely dead inside

[@lukeskywalker6809]

He’s a pathetic loser who desperately wants to be relevant and a real filmmaker.

[@eddiepalmer9543]

He had a lot of life like 10 years ago don't know what happened

[@richardjared960]

He’s a sellout

[@guilhermehank4938]

@@eddiepalmer9543 He sold out for a microscopic chance at "making it"

[@TheEducator89]

Disney money buys a lot of Crack.

[@pizzathehutt1812]

I’ll never forget when he praised last Jedi and I go and see it and think to myself “what the fk was Stuckman on about?”

[@air1das]

I unsubbed when he praised Blade Runner 2049

[@madbart214yomother7]

The exact moment i stopped caring about his channel.

[@TheEducator89]

For me it was BvS.

[@elderroll4017]

he even gave xmen apocalypse an a. that shit was fckd

[@mrxxx267]

He refuses to criticise any movie only coz one day he went to a real set and realised how hard is to make a movie... because before he thought the magic of cinema did it all by itself

[@buntado6]

He's the kind of person that would beg for a good grade on a disastrous exam because he did "a lot of effort" studying.

[@mrxxx267]

@buntado6 he gave a disastrous math exam coz he only used positive numbers and ignored negatives in all multiplication

[@MellowMutant]

😂

[@MellowMutant]

​@buntado6 🤣

[@tacticianAlexandra]

If that a true story. Is this man stupid? Like of course it takes effort to put together a movie, even a lazy thrown together piece of trash, takes a bit of effort to create. It really doesn't matter how much effort is put into the making of the film. At the end of the day the quality will remain the same. Sure it might be interesting to hear about how they created the film, to learn more in depth about why it was so good or bad. More so if you making your own stuff, so you know what to do/avoid.

[@doublep1980]

Stuckmann has gone full-on John Campea. Never go full-on John Campea.

[@everythingisawesome2903]

Funny thing is John Campea defended him after his video came out. You know you are realky wrong when John Campea is defending you.

[@doublep1980]

@@everythingisawesome2903 Shill is shilling for another shill. Shillception!

[@mistermike4023]

You know it's bad when AngryJoe of all people, Perturbed Pedro himself, calls him out on his spineless take

[@rhysproudmourne1646]

Yeah, Stuckman. How hard something is to do makes it therefore impervious to criticism. Oh wait, every product and service NEEDS criticism to improve itself in a free market... - Can't stand Stuckman. He always does this middle of the road, never critique type of critique. No idea how anyone can watch that.

[@jeremyusreevu237]

And of course, his fanbase worships him like the second coming of Jesus because "He's such a nice guy!"

[@mrgrizzy1989]

He CARES so much though 😆

[@rhysproudmourne1646]

@@mrgrizzy1989 I watched a few of his videos probably 6 or so years ago. And after watching around a half dozen to a dozen, I realized I wasn't learning anything about the film, wasn't finding myself entertained and wasn't even getting a fair critique, which (hint hint Stuckman) is the point of listening to a critic in the first place! So, he's not informative, entertaining or a critic. What is the point of his channel? And why do people watch him in droves? - I guess there really is a million people in this world who would be entertained by the jangling of keys in front of their face.

[@AliceBowie]

It's difficult to build a bridge, so if it won't bear weight, and collapses when a car drives over it, you can't criticize it.

[@rhysproudmourne1646]

@@AliceBowie Rofl, exactly. Criticism and failure is the fastest road to improvement. Stuckman is such an id10t. It's like a chef refusing to turn on the heat for the oven or stove. "I refuse to critique bad movies as a critic." Lol, he wrote the joke about himself...

[@jtmplmbr4465]

Chris, as Carlin once said, “It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.” Time to accept reality buddy.

[@gamervet4760]

3:12 Oh my God! He's just babbling now about personal shit that no one gives a fuck about. What a class ass.

[@Adam-sd2ow]

If Sydney Sweeney is offended by my awesome t*ts comments, I'm sorry if the truth hurts.

[@randomguy6679]

So anyone who talks about their feelings is an ass?

[@callmeviper7723]

Let’s not forget Chris Stuckmann came out as “Pansexual” a few years ago.

[@guilhermehank4938]

Christ, he is desperate for attention

[@Your_MInd_is_A_weapon]

That explains a lot actually

[@guilhermehank4938]

@@serafaus what cult ?

[@nedz7967]

@@guilhermehank4938 Jehovah's Witnesses.

[@willcommon6164]

Whats that have to do with his review of this movie?! hahah literally nothing! Nice try though! hahahahah

[@gonetounderground]

the OG's of film criticism, siskel and ebert, would laugh this clown off the balcony

[@Quaquadaqu]

Siskel and ebert were clowns

[@djjuno106]

Him not reviewing this movie says more about how bad this movie is than him actually reviewing it.

[@RealStoriesBank]

And also how bad his own movie is. 😂

[@DeanOliver1964]

I used to really like Chris Stuckmann but he's completely sold his soul to his corporate overloads. He's not a "film critic", he is a coward.

[@mufasa8522]

He literally shit on the studios the entire video....

[@StarsDie88]

He literally isn't a film critic and doesn't call himself a film critic. He released a video like 2 years ago saying that he was no longer going to be a film critic and/or review channel and he transparently said it was because he doesn't want to shit on people that he could potentially work with/for. I mean... Yeah, his channel is dogshit now because he's no longer a critic, but he's been nothing but open about this whole thing. He's not feeding anyone a line of shit or pretending to be something he's not.

[@PortugueseMACPOW]

Stuckmann? More like Stuckwomann

[@ToRageAgainstTheDyingoft-uh4cn]

@@mufasa8522 Right lol I am so confused about the hate.

[@Kaylor_Ryan]

He became a poppet of the industry

[@javiersp15]

I needed this. Stuckmann went all soft.

[@anubusx]

Funny how Chris has criticised many other films in the past.

[@MilosCsrb]

Since hes in industry hes licking ass @@anubusx

[@patrioticcat5768]

@@anubusxhes not doing it now BECAUSE how much he used to do it back then. Because he doesn't want his own stuckman making videos about him telling others not to go see his film. He's a little bitch. He should embrace "muh toxic" fan base because living in a Circle jerk only wanting to praise films gets you nowhere.

[@mindlessmeat4055]

People wonder why we can't trust reviewers. Reviewers like him not willing to give reviews on a horrible film just so he can maintain social standing with those in power. Pathetic.

[@mufasa8522]

He literally shit on the studios the entire video. So you're wrong

[@dbt4869]

@@mufasa8522 you really did not pay attention to video did you? He is literally defending bad film makers and making all sorts of excuses to not criticize a movie that's by definition cowardice

[@dbt4869]

@@mufasa8522 also stop fanboying

[@incinerati]

@@dbt4869dude was shitting on the studios, which are most of the time the main culprit behind shitty movies. so stop crying.

[@shawnlittle3091]

There are people that give their honest reviews even though sometimes we may not agree with them there’s KZbinrs like Matt a.k.a. Ramboraph4life and Fabio a.k.a. TheItalianstallion51

[@TheSamurai518]

Chris Gore said on an EFAP, that Stuckmann basically sold his soul to Hollywood and doesn't want to burn bridges.

[@dp2901]

His simping is literally a textbook class in how to spot a pathological liar.

[@incinerati]

You didn't even watch his video, now did ya? ;)

[@reservoirdude92]

The dude was all on the side of the "artists" during the SAG/AFTRA and WGA strikes, so what does that tell you?

[@SIngli6]

How can people like you be so utterly thick to see a landscape of film that you despise and not suppose that the key people at fault are the ones funding the fucking films? 'OH, how dare the people with less money who do most of the work in the industry ask the people with more money and who do BUGGER ALL to give them more money!'

[@incinerati]

That he's on the side of artists.

[@SIngli6]

Tells me a lot more that you're on the side of studio executives.

[@randomguy6679]

That you picked the wrong side?

[@mozax8118]

Ever since Chris got in the Hollywood game with his own projects, I think that it also affected his style of content. Which is why I am glad we have the Critical Drinker who is unafraid to call out the B.S. in modern cinema, whilst also highlighting either underrated gems, or genuinely great entertainment.

[@commandershepard7728]

LOL CD will claim any movie made past 2018 Starring a women is "woke", and then list famous female lead movies to prove he doesn't just hate women........like Alien......and Aliens.....of and then there was Alien 3....

[@Mooseman327]

@@commandershepard7728 Yes, but he's not wrong.

[@commandershepard7728]

@@Mooseman327 he scream “go woke go broke” with his lover nerdrotic ….. yet Barbie and spiderverse 2 where woke and made MILLIONS. So I just proved you and him wrong in one post!

[@idiot_city5444]

Drinker is just as insufferable lol just on the other side of the spectrum. Obviously right about tons of things, but insufferable nonetheless

[@BubbleBoyMTL]

Most KZbinr are shills, including Stuckmann, The Drinker, Nerdrotic and so many other.

[@ahoramazda6864]

>Refuses to criticize bad films >The next films are even worse >Refuses to criticize even worse films >The following films are incredibly terrible >Oh, gee, how did our ancestors were so stupid as to fall into the Dark Ages? This is how. This “critic” is literally corrupting the field in which he dreams of working. You see it right before your eyes and people are applauding and waiting for a new cinematic slop.

[@deadpoolguy283]

For everyone who didnt see it yet: Watch the Vid where he cries over RLM making fun of him.

[@captainrex6919]

Where to watch it?

[@deadpoolguy283]

@@captainrex6919 kzbin.info/www/bejne/aKLThWqYjLiarck

[@guilhermehank4938]

Sauce, please

[@Simbala-bq5vy]

​@@guilhermehank4938🍮

[@everythingisawesome2903]

​@@guilhermehank4938RLM guys called him a hack in a video and then Chris made a video about RLM guys making fun of him. He was almost bursting into tears throughout the entire video.

[@keithoneil9894]

Just because a movie is hard to make doesn't mean it is above criticism. The gatekeeping I saw over the weekend like "If you knew how hard it is to make a movie then you'd be a lot nicer, yada yada yada" was weird. And what kind of critic holds themself back because they're afraid of upsetting someone?

[@JeffBird86]

This makes me respect someone like Jeremy jahns even more. Stuckman lost his balls.

[@apocolypse11]

Never had any.

[@JeffBird86]

@@apocolypse11 really?

[@nobblkpraetorian5623]

Yeah, Jeremy Jahns and Critical Drinker are my go to for movie reviews now.

[@zothanzualachhangte3416]

Jeremy Jahns still have the balls to give it a dog shit 😂

[@IamIRONMAN---]

He’s not wrong about Sony not caring based off who they’re hiring to make their movies!!

[@nyx.2314]

I mean... if he is trying to get in the club, bashing the studios that hire you is a baaaaaaaaad move. Good luck gettin a deal now Chris.

[@user-iz8hu2hn5b]

He also didn't review sound of freedom, that says alot

[@rowboat1972]

Stuckman's annoying.

[@magnushorus5670]

the toxic and insultingly bitter scyhophants over at shillcast are even worse.... they never talk about whats good in those poorly written woke movies, they only complain when people call out the bad writing

[@Unicornpirate]

Which channel?

[@HiddenHandMedia]

Shillcast?

[@magnushorus5670]

@@Unicornpirate The Initiative, the guy is suuuch a projecting scummy douche

[@magnushorus5670]

@@Unicornpirate the Initiative... such superficial "arguments" from them

[@el_chapo_ibn_john_al_drakowski]

He sounds like he has too much oestrogen

[@razzbender3385]

Calling him a film critic is a stretch. Calling him a filmmaker is a joke.

[@james1327]

This guy is useless at this point.

[@jwroot]

I still don't understand why he still has 2 million subscribers.

[@satanwest2923]

Screw these sucky filmmakers and writers, they should lose their jobs.

[@randomguy6679]

And you should lose yours with that attitude.

[@OoLOSTWORLDoO]

Film makers shouldn't be film critics. Period.😮

[@ratskraad5890]

He made one shitty indie film and now suddenly he is a celebrity in hollywood

[@ratskraad5890]

@ClayJunior-lf2qe far from that sad disappointed youtubers are basically morphing into corporate but at least he getting a bag by playing politics

[@Aaliyahchannel2024]

​@ClayJunior-lf2qeyou gay?

[@themailman3331]

Stuckmann has drastically changed over the last 2 years. He will no longer criticize any movie because of whatever straight to on-demand or syfy channel horror movie he is working on. He’s clearly become a shill and it’s kinda sad to watch.

[@vinylated]

I wonder if those who backed it can get a refund? Lol

[@Briansgate]

When I was young, I didn't understand why older people were so angry with stuff all the time. Now that I'm the 'older people', I get it completely. I now understand that when I was young, I didn't know any better. Hollywood is just about ignoring the older people that know, and focusing on the youth that have no idea how bad they are.

[@lancethefilmguy9392]

Facts 💯💯💯💯💯

[@AbrasiousProductions]

I'm 20 and I've felt old for a long time.

[@angelseda9823]

Also.. him and his wife are part of that alphabet community, he has to tow the line !!!

[@bassman8144]

Chris would drop everything and work for the Hollywood Reporter if they paid him enough. No balls or morals.

[@GrundleGrump]

He's making his own film? I didn't know that. He NEVER mentions oit......

[@SouthwestTed]

I liked his videos back when he had actual opinions. If I want to watch people talk without saying anything, I'll watch the news.

[@wolfstar675]

Hes gonna go mental if there are negative revjews about his movie "Shelby Oaks"

[@RichardDuncan-ju1xk]

How can he breathe with his face so far up Hollywood's A&&?

[@sexycenturion7074]

practice.

[@MellowMutant]

😂

[@PetePuebla]

So let me get this straight, he doesn't want to bash his fellow artists but bashes film studios that give filmmakers the opportunity to make films? That makes no complete sense

[@SIngli6]

How does it not make sense? He's angry with studios for essentially forcing filmmakers to make bad movies while then letting the filmmakers take all the blame.

[@PetePuebla]

@@SIngli6 if you're an aspiring filmmaker wanting to make films would you bash a movie studio? Blame a studio and not the cast?

[@SIngli6]

@@PetePuebla You would if you were trying to make a legitimate point.

[@incinerati]

@@PetePueblayou're really not into movies, aren't you?

[@randomguy6679]

Film studios can be corrupt too man, just look at Warner Brothers.

[@bjornskivids]

"I do try to keep it mostly about film celebration" That's why I don't watch him. He's not a critic, he does PR for the films

[@SamElliottsStache]

Because he's another modern-day Kevin Smith, an industry cheerleader. He can't disparage several million-dollar productions or else he'll lose ad revenue and subs. TL:DR: He's another shill who barely criticizes films that deserve it.

[@TheHorrorExperiment]

Remember when beards use to be a symbol of masculinity?

[@tyrannozilla]

I'd rather stay bald then have to fear about having hair like Chris'.

[@NigelThrashner]

Now you can have one even if you’re a women 😂!

[@tyrannozilla]

Nope, I'm a man, just like being bald. It's more comfortable in the summer.@@NigelThrashner

[@NigelThrashner]

@@tyrannozillasorry, old chap. I meant to reply to that horror experiment fellow.

[@tyrannozilla]

No worries.@@NigelThrashner

[@justyx846]

Chris says that credibility is over-rated.

[@vzzmhx]

"Eating your cake....and having it too"--> it never works.... hence the longevity of said saying. I'm done with Chris Stuckmann.

[@chrissibersky4617]

I see where this is going. Within a year he will be a guy with purple hair, red lipstick and severe TDS. If your talent isn't enough to get you into Hollywood you got to take the other road.

[@adampkalb]

While I do not agree with it, I do still understand Chris Stuckmann's line of thinking to rationalize refusing to review Madame Web. He believes that if you do not have anything nice to say about a film you just watched, do not say anything at all - in which case, Chris would say nothing about Cuties because saying anything nice about *that sort of film* almost feels illegal at this point in time, when anything nice to say about Cuties only serves to trivialize how Bien Ou Bien Productions exploited, harmed or inappropriately directed the kids starring in that film. BlackCriticGuy is not a creeper like mrgirl, but BlackCriticGuy still got plenty of well-deserved dislikes and negative comments for defending Cuties and making it seem like a deep and thought-provoking film that deserves some praise, because he ignored how abysmal Cuties truly is for not only trivializing the bad things the girls acting in Cuties were directed to do, but also for trivializing the heinous actions of Amy and still expecting us to see her as the hero of the story after multiple people - both among the Cuties girls and among her own family members call her out on her selfish and inappropriate behavior. Back to the topic of Madame Web, if Chris Stuckmann truly knows how hard it is to make a good film, then he should also know how easy it is to make a bad film and how easy it is to criticize a bad film. Since he can not give Madame Web any constructive criticism whatsoever, I will. Madame Web feels like a prequel to nothing. It should have given us a real reason to care about Cassandra Webb, Anya, Celeste and Julia by giving them unique personality traits and better emotional acting direction for us to distinguish them as different characters, but it never even did that right when the whole point of this story's setup is to give us a sense of the type of people they are before they get their superpowers and super heroine costumes. Ezekiel is a boring, undeveloped villain with no other legitimate motivation to be evil other than, he fears what the spider-girls will do to him in the future and has no real evidence that they can do that. I was surprisingly open-minded to Madame Web being a Spider-Man lite film that only has the essence of a Spider-Man film with no Spider-Man in it, but Madame Web's writers and directors had to care about developing their movie's own lesser-known main characters as a team, to prompt us viewers to care about watching what they were doing when Peter Parker was born, so we can imagine how Anya, Celeste and Julia can become a good team of superheroines in the future. May 11, 2024, 2:21pm

[@charliescott2810]

Studios have always been a problem but talented people generally tend to make it work cough Nolan cough Coppola cough Hitchcock etc

[@lowlowseesee]

so cowardly. imagine what he would do for them behind closed doors lol

[@komred64]

I've been subscribed to Chris Stuckmann's channel since like 2010, and found some of his deep analysis, especially the Nicolas Winding Refn films like Drive and Only God Forgives, enlightening. But this was over a decade now, and another YT channel opened my eyes when they said that he actually says nothing in his so called movie reviews. He just describes the plot, throws around some cool adjectives, and is done with it. On one hand I understand not wanting to say bad things about your "colleagues". On the other... you are supposed to be a film critic, aren't you? Besides, you can and should give constructive criticism beyond "film = bad" and not come across like a douchebag.

[@mrgrizzy1989]

I actually had a variation of what u said at the end there in the thumbnail... but I just couldn't make it work unfortunately... but yes he's literally refusing to do his job, and patting himself on the back for it!!!

[@jimnasium3208]

EFAP?

[@jntnprrs2978]

Very few KZbin critics say as much about the films as Chris Stuckmann. Like 90% of them are just clickbaity "I hate everything because that makes me cool at this moment when negativity is the shit". These edgy ass video makers have nothing to say other than "it was poorly written" but then they can't even point out what was poor about the writing. You can find videos that are over an hour long but they still don't have anything real in them. But I guess nowadays people just love to hate. No wonder Stuckmann got tired of that trend and wants to focus on the positives. But ofcourse in the modern world that's something to be laughed at. Real men must be tough and mean and blah blah fucking blah

[@2501vai]

Chris is a broken man now. It's so sad and you can see it in his eyes. I knew the moment he declared "I'm not gonna talk negatively about films anymore and do away with the grading system etc" that something was off. He's sold his soul to appease big daddy Hollywood before even getting his first feature out. He's become a puppet. Why, Chris?

[@Unicornpirate]

I'm glad people are calling him out now in 2024. I unsubbed from him back in 2016 when he gave Ghostbusters 2016 a B. I was like yeah no this guy doesn't know what he is talking about.

[@randomguy6679]

That was eight years ago man, get over it.

[@Unicornpirate]

@@randomguy6679 He's fallen far after that. Like here he's refusing to criticize Madame Web because he's trying to be a movie maker. He went full shill. The only 2 movie reviewers I trust are Critical Drinker and Jeremy Jahns

[@randomguy6679]

@@Unicornpirate Doesn’t change the fact that movie was eight years ago now and people are talking about that more than genuinely great movies.

[@randomguy6679]

@@Unicornpirate And Critical Drinker is a hypocrite who can’t do the “fake drunk” comedy but worth shit.

[@skepticsanalysis528]

Tarantino knows full well the hardships and constraints of making a movie. Yet he never shies away from critiquing other films when necessary.

[@randomguy6679]

Didn’t he say in an interview that he doesn’t like shitting on specific films?

[@dwecktek]

Stuckmann looks like hes about to cry the entire video lmao!!!!!

[@mrgrizzy1989]

Like a REAL man 😂

[@NathanDrakeTheGreat]

It's obvious he wants to stay positive to get in to Hollywood, but I don't think he realizes how quickly they're ready to replace him and others with AI. With how rapidly it's advancing, they will stop hiring new talent and just use AI for spec scripts from now on. He missed his window, they don't need him anymore. He may as well start bashing shit movies again, they're not giving him a job anytime soon.

[@ParkerCS2]

Mr. Krabs: OH BOO HOO! Let me play Chris Stuckmann a sad tune on the world’s smallest violin!

[@ASoBiDeaTHTRaP]

SO, HE’S NOT about bashing other filmmakers and artists? I wonder if anything on his Hilariocity playlist is monetised. The playlist where he openly talked shit about people working both independently, and under the studio system. The playlist he used to help elevate his career, and now he’s going to just sit there and gaslight his audience into believing that he refuses to harshly criticise, because now he has something to lose. For example, on The Fanatic he says: “It’s a horrible movie, I mean, every decision is wrong. There are maybe two things about this movie, I actually sat back and thought ‘That’s a good idea,’ and we’ll talk about those in a sec, but my fucking god…” He a hypocrite. Albeit a perfect fit for Hollywood.

[@PseudoNym13]

>filmmaker since when? did he finally finish shelby oaks after... like 10 years?

[@temperedglass1130]

"Tell that to Zods's snapped neck"

[@rockbottom2822]

I always thought the phrase "Get Stuckmanized" was just an allegory for rape. Now I'm sure.

[@ryanshippen859]

Hey, gotta get that Hollywood paycheck somehow. Even if it means making yourself look like a complete fool. Because nowadays when it comes to movies, it pays to lie.

[@lancethefilmguy9392]

I have nothing against Chris Stuckmann. Seems like a great dude. That being said, it is hypocritical for him not to say anything negative about movies today. Even though he used to be critical towards films in the past. Does anyone remember his hilariousity reviews? Or movies that he gave an F grade to?

[@magicjohnson3121]

Nah something off about him

[@MrOliva123]

The old stockmen was the shit. Sad to see this new version of him.

[@Ashkihyena]

Basically being the definition of shill.

[@tomround8271]

I still chuckle, when I think about a recent video where you said that you can tell the Acolyte will be terrible just by looking at Leslie Hedland

[@mrgrizzy1989]

You can also tell she's a lesbian just by looking at her 😁😜😆

[@TheDBZEDITOR]

@@mrgrizzy1989You’re right. 🫣

[@manuelc5786]

The king of the shills; Chris “Mr. Boring” Stuckmam.

[@Sheevlord]

The irony is that his unwillingness to review the movie speaks louder about the quality of the movie than anything he could've said in a review. If it's so bad that even Stuckmann can't come up with anything positive to say about it then it has to be unimaginably bad.

[@yoomazir]

Oh man, I miss that Deadpool game 🤣

[@Adam-sd2ow]

So if he goes to a restaurant and gets undercooked cold food, he just eats it, to not offend the hard work and artistry of the chef?

[@Denden971]

It appears so.

[@I_am_Kamelot]

Imagine the discourse he would have given if the study was Disney or Marvel???

[@andresmason1551]

It’s heart breaking to see him become what he dislikes about the filming industry

[@GlobalCamron]

This is the same guy that critics Star Wars prequels and george Lucas.

[@matthewhipps3221]

Seriously he pitched a fit about the maybe 4 minutes of screen time made up of “senate meetings” yet didn’t say the same thing about Oppenheimer which had an entire subplot made up of senate meetings. So which is it, are senate meetings good or bad? Btw Oppenheimer being a better film than the PT is irrelevant.

[@jeremyusreevu237]

Yeah, I had a feeling you'd make a video about this.

[@mrgrizzy1989]

You know me well!

[@jeremyusreevu237]

@@mrgrizzy1989 I'm actually going to see Madame Web on the 27th.

[@Imty23]

@@jeremyusreevu237Oh my gosh, good luck watching that movie just to let you know you won’t get your money back

[@jeremyusreevu237]

@@Imty23 Well, I won't be paying for it. I'm going to see it as part of an event, and they're gonna be the ones paying for it.

[@douglasammirati8450]

Used to love Chris Stuck, but he went WUBAR - woked up beyond any repair - when he got close to movie making. Guy won't even give scores to movies anymore because he doesnt want to hurt the feelings of anyone involved, gimme a fucking break.

[@tr051982]

Yup I'm done with suckman and his garbage critique

[@LUNATIC75]

A very, very long time ago I was subbed to his channel.

[@DonKey496]

I've never taken this guy seriously anyway...

[@elronaldopablo]

I remember watching him a lot but around 2017 or earlier, I thought he started changing. I couldn't point my finger on what exactly. I recall thinking he sounded condescending or something. I stopped watching him and Angry Joe, and chose to only check out Jeremy Jahns.

[@michaelsegriff3362]

His days of being a credible movie critic are over. If he ever was one.

[@FTChomp9980]

Chris The Shillmen isn't as good as Jeremy at least he gives real legit reviews.

[@jeremyusreevu237]

Indeed. I make great reviews.

[@rhysproudmourne1646]

Yeah, defending bad movies is certainly productive to the point of film enjoyment. Why are you a film critic, Stuckman? And yeah, you hit the nail on the head. He just wants to be in the club.... so if that means he has to bend the knee and sniff the f@rts until they let him in (which they won't) he will do it for his whole life. He needs some self respect and self reflection.

[@jeremyusreevu237]

And his audience feeds off of that, because they're so insecure about their love of bad movies, so they need Stuckmann to validate them.

[@rhysproudmourne1646]

@@jeremyusreevu237 His middle of the road, not wanting to disturb anything critiques can't even be called critiques and therefore he can't be called a critic.

[@jeremyusreevu237]

@@rhysproudmourne1646 Doesn't matter to them. All they want is vauge, bland slop, that only vaguely resembles movie critique, because actual opinions are SCAWY!

[@thomaskishmanii2675]

I miss the days of Siskel and Ebert.

[@berjaboy]

He's refusing to review that film, for the same reason he suddenly came out as pansexual a few years ago. Is he planning of leaving his wife and twin sons for a trans woman? Of course not. So why announce something like that to the world when there's no need to? .....To suck up to Hollywood, that's why!