Tesla Model Y vs Jaguar I-Pace: Which Electric SUV is Better? + Side by Side Feature Comparison

[@Cleanerwatt]

Correction: The Model Y has +1.3 inches more headroom in the rear (not less as I accidentally put in the chart and mentioned in the video).

[@Stefan_Bln]

Excellent video - thank you for that. Maybe you should consider to show your measurements in parallel with metric units. Best regards from Berlin

[@elmaan]

You forgot to mention Tesla Autopilot is not free but $5000 option

[@adrianwood8820]

Lol I was wondering how the low roof of the ipace beat the Tesla Greatvideo by the way I’d love to see the same comparison on the Audi ✊

[@jeffnreno5080]

@@elmaan AP is included in the base price now but it is essentially lane keep. You may be thinking of FSD and that is a $7k option.

[@Cleanerwatt]

@@elmaan The basic driver's assist features that the I-Pace offers for $3K are free in any Tesla now. For $7K, you can get FSD.

[@ashrashand6039]

Tesla fan boy. 😂These are very different cars. Just because two things have similar dimensions, it doesn’t make them direct competitors. Ever heard of apples and oranges? It’s like comparing a Ford and a Cadillac! Anyone who has sat in a Jaguar vs a Tesla will tell you that the Jag is by far the more pleasant place to be. You look at performance, but don’t even look at handling! That means going around corners, which has never been a strong point of American cars. 😆 You also don’t even mention off-road capability! Why even look at a SUV, if that’s not even on your radar? The Jag has the same awesome off-road capabilities that other Jaguar land rovers are globally famous for. It can also ford rivers! Can the model Y or any Tesla for that matter? If you want to drive an SUV only on tarmac and don’t care about build quality (have you seen the uneven panel gaps on Tesla’s?!), then buy a Tesla. If you want a premium luxury car that can also take you anywhere, then buy a Jaguar. They’re not even aimed at the same market segments!

[@aldeflorio5500]

Well said, Ash. The logic this guy uses would result in a Prius being more desirable than a PHEV X5. Dumb.

[@tribalypredisposed]

Fine, the Model Y wins, what did anyone expect? But no need to bash on Jaguar, they are a small company and the I-Pace is one of the better EVs any legacy automaker has managed so far. It is also their first EV, and Elon Musk is very clear about the importance of iterations. Yes, their own fault for waiting so long to make their first EV, but give them some credit here for doing an admirable job with limited resources. Of course Jaguar's first EV is not as good as Tesla's fifth EV, any other result would require an act of God.

[@simonhurlimann908]

I would agree the Y is the overall better car but in terms of luxury, interior, HUD as well as driving dynamics it might be the Jag 😉 for me the dealbreaker is the poor efficiency

[@thegreatestmoo]

You could buy 2 model 3's for one i-fail, I mean pace

[@rdk3996]

If your going to add those features to the base IPace just use the HSE trim model. If has those features and saves $$$.

[@molaw8162]

Beautifully made

[@congnguyen490]

This was no a comparison. This was a murder. Someone call the police

[@carholic-sz3qv]

nonsense

[@duanehorton4680]

What exactly makes the Model Y so much more efficient than the I-Pace? The efficiency difference is quite perplexing.

[@shuriken4852]

Because their motor is more efficient and their software manages the batteries much better.

[@BobBob-ij9jm]

Tesla built a more efficient car there are a million little ways to reduce your electricity consumption. The biggest things are probably the motor's efficiency the temperature management system and the amount of wiring in the car (oh and more weight). A stat I heard was that the model 3 had over a mile of wiring inside the car and the model y got that number down to 300 yards. The I-pace also has the disadvantage of being less efficient which means they have to have a bigger battery pack to increase the range which in turn makes the car weigh more which makes it less efficient. Inefficiencies compound and make the car bad.

[@simoc24]

shuriken48 that’s a big part of it I am sure

[@Mercilessonion]

The battery chemistry plays a huge role. Tesla has been improving it for some time. I'm not a battery expert so I can't quite explain how it works...

[@waynerussell6401]

The aero on the i-Pace was crippled at the earliest stage of the design by the insistence of using a Marque defining ICE grill! The rest is just less talented engineering. Watch their pre-production PR promotional boasting videos. Hilarious!

[@zippeo5388]

I guess the Model Y handles as the Model 3. The I-Pace is much better to drive than Model 3, for me that is the key factor, I-Pace is better on-road and off-road. Sure, for going from A to B and bringing a lot of cargo Model Y is much better value for money but if that is the key criteria a lot of (fossil) cars would beat Model Y. Still, Model Y seems to be a good family car and if you go electric a good option for families.

[@rdk3996]

Not sure what model years or timeframes you used for prices, but Model Y prices have gone up! Wouldn’t be surprised if (US 2023 models) are closed to being the same, not the drastic difference you state. Thank you. PS you should use reference dates in this rapidly changing industry.

[@rdk3996]

Given recent Tesla price reductions, my comment was way off.

[@fluffy24]

I just clicked the video to comment this: Tesla modely Y is the best car. Best regards

[@attella-dh9en]

Dude i own I pace SHE for 1 year and had model y before. 4 times in 1 month tesla had to come out to fix their interior problems . Quality of tesla yoy cant even compare to jaguar. If I really needed I paid on wheels I would probably keep tesla. Jaguar is beautiful from every angle and drives anazing

[@johnmontgomery3169]

It's like comparing the Corolla (I-Pace) to a Lexus (Tesla) but you pay more for the Corolla, and you get a free smart phone and a pay raise with the Lexus. That said I think there will be a market for the I-Pace.

[@ppeou5190]

good video, pretty much if you want to go full electric, tesla is the only way to go right now. I own a porsche e-hybrid, when I decide to go full electric or buy my wife an electric vehicle, has to be tesla, even if you don't use autopilot

[@Koen_Meloen]

Like your review but you only compare featured where you could argue if these are the most important ones. Like you are comparing an apple watch to a rolex. Still I like the model y but if you look second hand you can buy a nice jag instead of a y which you see a lot on the road. Like luxury watched some people like to have a special car which you do not see at every corner. So it really depends on your brand preference i guess. Still like to highlight that without tesla no other brand would start to design and sell electric cars.

[@user-jt1jv8vl9r]

Anyone else here thinking FSD isn't worth paying for at the moment? Especially if you only intend to keep the car 3-4 years. By the time it's available people will most likely be looking to replace for a newer model.

[@toddwright662]

If you're only keeping the car for 3-4 years, then yeah your conclusion is probably correct. If, on the other hand, you're likely to keep your car for much longer and you want that feature when it actually comes to fruition, it's probably not a bad play to buy it soon; especially since Musk made it publicly known that they will be raising the price of FSD as new capabilities that fall under FSD get released and/or it gets closer in time to FSD being fully realized. As it stands right now, FSD isn't even close to worth $7k, but when it is feature complete (assuming you have confidence it will be) then I think its worth far more than $7k.

[@AverageJoe3]

R you will miss the best feature of a car that no other cars has. Buying Tesla witout autopilot is like paying for a trip to Hawai and than staying at hotel to save money.

[@toddwright662]

@@AverageJoe3 They all have Autopilot. Full Self Driving is another level altogether that in its current form only adds a bit of functionality but is improving regularly and should allow the car to at some point be fully autonomous.

[@AverageJoe3]

Todd Wright Yes I meant FSD package. It adds a LOT of functionality. With basic autopilot you actualy have only something simillat to ACC. With FSD you will get automatic linechanges, onramp offramp, autolane change, autopark and summon. Also stopping on traffic lights and stop signs is already ready for testers and is displaying on UI. Dont miss on FSD. Its the best feature of Teslas and you will use it every single day.

[@toddwright662]

@@AverageJoe3 That makes sense. And I'm with you. I paid for FSD a while back, but I can see why someone might not see enough value in it as it currently operates. I didn't when I bought the car, but I added it later because I am projecting the value WILL be there and I will want it when its feature complete, and I didn't want to have to pay significantly more for it later.

[@directorjustin]

The Model Y is in a class of its own. Nothing comes close!

[@bandvitromaniaios1307]

Well if you want an a efficient compact car that takes you where you want but its not really luxuryous then take the Model Y but if you want an a luxuryous suv that isn’t very efficient and also youll need to stop at multiple chargers then take the Jaguard iPace.

[@TheSpiroTube]

How deep can the model y be submerged in water without any damage vs the Ipace?

[@dandil]

there's very few car comparison reviews where there's a 40% difference in purchase price...

[@mcbc5189]

The only real value of a Tesla over other electric vehicles is the charging network, not the car. Self-driving is not a benefit-provided feature but instead just unnecessary and expensive. There is absolutely no value in trusting a car to drive itself in any circumstance. Just ask those Tesla drivers who killed themselves trusting Autopilot. Lane Assist, Smart Cruise Control, and Object Avoidance are the only features of this type that provide any real value to daily driving. It doesn't matter how good you want to believe Tesla's Auto Pilot is you're only putting yourself and your family in unnecessary danger. Reaction times for Auto Pilot might be better than a human but AutoPilot will NEVER be able to "read" the intent of other drivers before they act and anticipate those actions or make corrections ahead of time, especially for actions about to transpire further ahead of the car's sensors. Ergo, never include hands-free driving systems when comparing cars.

[@justdigit]

Not even close...

[@steffen8964]

JustDigIt by far!

[@surfnetdz]

Tesla is also a safer vehicle?

[@toddwright662]

Unknown for certain at this point as the Model Y has not been third party safety tested yet, but given their history with the 3, S, and X it's a pretty good bet that it will achieve higher safety scores. Although a quick search did show the I-Pace did score a 5* with Euro NCAP (lower in every category than the Model 3, but still a 5*) so safety doesn't really appear to be a weak point for the I-Pace.

[@DrUrlf]

Yeah I mean there is nothing really left to say. Tesla is so embarassingly far ahead of it's "competitors" when it comes to EV technology that I don't see the traditional car manufacturers make it for another 20 years.

[@kristiansberg5865]

Extremely biased video, not only are you comparing a 2018 vehicle to a 2020 vehicle, but also only highlighting the categories where the tesla wins. Personally i think handling and design are two massively important aspects you've failed to cover.

[@ScottJackson123]

You’d struggle to find a panel gap and/or a squeak or rattle when you drive the iPace... plus it a Jag! It’s a classy car with a build quality you’d expect from a luxury OEM... The model Y is an Apple watch, the Jag is a Rolex.

[@DarkWing494]

Yes and you are a awesome Jag fan unlike some others here (dont forget about superior air suspension)

[@Delitor]

@@DarkWing494 luckily the ipace doesnt cost 80k or something haha

[@yahikotendo5631]

While the winner is clear, I'm very glad to see more electric cars from different manufacturers. The future looks bright😤😤

[@MyUniversalUniversity]

Agreed

[@user-jt1jv8vl9r]

No argument from me. Competition drives innovation and should lead to lower priced options. In the Uk I'm waiting/hoping for the German Gigafactory to reduce European 3 and Y pricing.

[@fjalics]

Look at what BNEF says about.bnef.com/blog/battery-pack-prices-fall-as-market-ramps-up-with-market-average-at-156-kwh-in-2019/

[@demultiplexdfunc177]

It is like comparing the iPhone to a Blackberry. There is no comparison.

[@Tuck_Frump]

Blackberry had the same functionality. The jaguar does not.

[@rally2247]

and the blackberry being more expensive than the iphone.

[@Tuck_Frump]

@@rally2247 wrong

[@rally2247]

@@Tuck_Frump???

[@Tuck_Frump]

@@rally2247 Apple sucks. Tesla is so much better.

[@mikeg7845]

I believe the i-pace still is eligible for a $7,500 federal tax credit in the US. That should be included the price comparison. It still gets crushed on price, but it is worth mentioning. Great video. Thanks!

[@strykerace]

This is true, however the iPace base price also negates it from getting subsidies from Canada and many of the state subsidies which can also be significant. Tesla consumers can still qualify for many state and international subsidies, largely depending a base price does not exceed some limit to meet subsidy guidelines. I doubt Jaguar qualifies for many subsidies as the price is so much higher for what you get.

[@larskefka3373]

So they failed upwards then.

[@ckgrier2]

@@strykerace people don't pay sticker price for i-Pace. 20% less in many cases.

[@jerrypierson3450]

@@ckgrier2 I ordered a model 3 performance model in August 2019, delivery in 2 weeks. I found out about the I-pace, the local dealers had a surplus on their hands. Test drove the I-Pace Jag and I was sold on it. With the $7,500 federal tax credit and a very big discount the price was about the same as the Model 3. The I-Pace is a drivers car, and I can pull off the road with out damage because of the greater ground clearance. Tesla refunded my deposit in less then a week, the cars really don't compete with each other. If I drive cross country, I take my Ram pickup with camper, I can stop and camp any where, so my driving is only around the LA area and I charge at home.

[@rfm357]

Jaguar has more luxurious feel and has better fit and finish.

[@richardstone512]

I used to be a big Tesla fan.. but I've grown tired of videos like this promoting Tesla falsehoods... Tesla does not reach it rated range and the ipace does.. the build quality on the ipace is in another league... It can offroad... Atleast try to be a little honest.... Model y mirrors don't dim... You should be ashamed to be this dishonest... Tesla does not reach EPA numbers... Many independent agencies have now verified that... Whereas every other manufacturer is significantly more accurate with their range estimates...

[@gbej1]

We all know what the answer is without even watching the video clip

[@iancrossley6637]

I don't recall you mentioning driving dynamics or interior design. This is important to some drivers. Something the Jag is famous for.

[@yosifhamdan550]

😂😂

[@toddwright662]

Design by its nature is subjective and not really quantifiable unless it is serving a particular function. Your opinion of the interior may differ from my opinion, although as a Model 3 owner I will concede there are aspects of the iPace interior I like better and I might like it a bit better overall, but I am a fan of the Model 3 spartan interior and would have a hard time giving it up; that uncluttered look works for me. On that same track, how do you want to measure "driving dynamics"? Because if you can't measure it, we're back to dueling opinions.

[@toddwright662]

@BLACKVIEW USA Don't get me wrong, I'm OK with "clutter" when it serves a purpose as it would in an airplane, but this isn't even remotely close to that. The vast majority of "clutter" that's been removed by Tesla is unnecessary in an EV (tach, oil temp gauge, oil pressure gauge, turbo boost, battery/alternator voltage...), have been addressed with in the 10 driver presets for set it once and forget it (seat, mirror, steering wheel adjustments), or can be done by voice, or for some things a combination of presets and voice. And I guess I can't imagine giving af (not even a little) what "every guy in the office thinks" of what "my new gf" looks like. But that's just me.

[@toddwright662]

@BLACKVIEW USA For my situation, I'd actually like to have seat heater controls accessible by the back set passengers, but I can see the value in not having them (small kids); but this seems a really small issue especially considering heated rear seats is something most cars don't even have. As for the presets, I have 3 presets set for just me in slightly different seating positions that when selected (about 1 second as well) the mirrors and the wheel automatically adjust; I don't have need (or want) for independent/dedicated mirror controls or steering wheel adjustment controls. And I disagree with your stance on voice commands. I use it nearly daily for the navigation system, and occasionally for the climate control; it's simple to use and it's very competent (and it's activated by a steering wheel button push so the mic isn't constantly open like it is for Siri, Alexa and the like). "Maybe you haven't been In a normal car recently, but they have tach, temp and fuel." I don't care about temp or tach because they're irrelevant in an EV. The last NORMAL car I owned (I'm excluding the Prius we still own as a second car that neither my wife nor I want to drive because of the Model 3) was a Subaru WRX. Driving an ICE has gotten less complicated in the recent past about what a driver needs to pay attention to, but with an EV the only data displayed on a traditional instrument cluster that's relevant to me while driving is my speed. "range and kwh" are different ways of displaying the same information and I leave with a full "tank" every morning so I don't even look at my "gas gauge" even though it's right there below the speed. What, aside from speed, do you want an EV to display? The fart noises are just silly (although based on my experience, do you know who finds the fart noises most entertaining? Well educated women. Who knew?); Netflix while sitting waiting for a ferry or waiting to pick up my wife at the airport is pretty cool.

[@AllanSustainabilityFan]

Tesla's pretty good in this area as well, last time they did a comparison vs the Model 3 it was not a competition, like not even close, check out Motortrends for details iirc. The Model Y will probably be somewhere between the 3 and the i-Pace in nimbleness. So no, I highly doubt the I-Pace would out-handle the Model Y on the road, BUT it should be better for off-road on the other hand due to higher clearance.

[@davidmaxwaterman]

But if a shame teslas are so ugly :/

[@toddwright662]

Sometimes function is its own beauty.

[@DarkWing494]

Ugly to some.

[@paullevy4656]

Not as a ugly as your face...Lol

[@andrewbolivar3040]

Agree Bumpkin. They were neat at first but when the models all started to look way too much alike with the more affordable models looking as featureless as white bread that’s where they lost me. For the price I want something attractive. I own a Prius, a car people already find mundane, i wouldn’t want to fork the cash to have an expensive version of that.😄 Suffice to say you are not alone in your assessment.

[@toddwright662]

@@andrewbolivar3040 Andrew, We have a Prius (2010 with 161k miles) and a nearly 2 year old Model 3. The two are not even remotely comparable. The Prius gets driven so little that in the 22 months we have had the Model 3, we've had to fill the Prius only 4 times and put approximately 1,300 miles on while putting on 30,700 mile on the Model 3 in that same time frame. I use the Prius when I have to (when my wife gets to the Model 3 first) and somewhere down the line we'd sure like to replace the Prius with another Tesla (or something comparable at the time), but that's a "wish list" thing right now. Anyone that thinks the a Tesla is just "an expensive version" of a Prius, hasn't driven a Tesla for any significant length of time (or maybe hasn't driven a Prius and has in inflated opinion of the Prius). Like I said, I have both; and I hate driving the Prius even though I know it's a perfectly good and serviceable car.

[@aagribeiro1975]

Have you ever driven either an i-Pace or a Model Y? This review is very biased towards Tesla.

[@Antontoo]

Just to cover a few more things: Tesla's big slick tablet blows away Jaguar's laggy infotainment system. iPace also has about HALF of Tesla's trunk space and it's frunk is a joke. Adaptive air suspension is probably the only thing Jaguar has on Model Y.

[@Anonym-dx2tp]

Anton Vilinskiy and then they don’t have such a Good supercharging network

[@baileyryanpatrick17]

Don't forget superior interior quality.

[@Antontoo]

@@errorlooo8124 Thats true no CarPlay and Android Auto on Teslas. I thought it would be an issue, but now I prefer Teslas wireless setup. Native google map engine in Tesla works good and I switched to Spotify for music as soon as I learned Tesla added it, so now I got everything I need without having to plugin. I just thow my phone on the charge mat (Model Y has it stock) and go. Also keep in mind that CarPlay and android platforms are not designed for big screen, so you only have one app open at a time, while in Tesla you have both map and music open.

[@Antontoo]

@@baileyryanpatrick17 Jaguar had nicer interior as far as materials went...but Tesla's minimal design feels very clean, more spacious (esp rear seats) and uncluttered. Tesla's seats are also way nicer unless you are putting up $4000 more for premium buckets in the iPace

[@andgate2000]

But I bet the jag is built better.

[@thezanzibarbarian5729]

Interesting video. But I'd still opt for the Jaguar. However, living in the UK, we don't have the vast distances that you do in the USA and 250 miles will get us almost all the way from the south to northern England. The one big difference that you didn't point out was they is are very different cars built for very different markets. Whilst the Jaguar is aimed at luxury motoring, the Tesla is aimed for mainstream motoring. It's like trying to compare a Rolex watch with a Samsung Galaxy watch. The Rolex will tell the time, and maybe give you the date and day. On the other hand, the Samsung has multiple apps to do all sorts of stuff. But which is the better watch? I know which one I'd choose. And I'm not keen on the Tesla's spartan interior. The Tesla looks like it was designed by Ikea. But that's a personal point of view. The jaguar's interior, on the other hand, is the far classier one to be in and that's why I'd go for the Jaguar.

[@jamesfranklin2203]

The model Y is much more convenient than the Jaguar I-Pace, but if could afford to pay I would choose the Jaguar

[@PaulSouthport]

James Franklin I did.

[@Tuck_Frump]

I don't have to watch the whole video. Tesla won

[@X862go]

Model Y please 🙋‍♂️🙋‍♂️

[@shuriken4852]

Who cares if FSD even happens or not in the future. Right now Autopilot on the Tesla when used will lower your risk of accident by 10x and he did not even mention that Teslas are the world safest cars on top of that. And unless I missed it, there was no mention of the over the air updates which is the killer feature that no other car maker has. Ah yes! forgot one last thing, how long does it take to get the iPace?

[@Cleanerwatt]

Right - thank you!

[@simoc24]

Very good point. Not that the I-Pace is unsafe, but Tesla is of course safer :) no quite 10X I thought (I may miss the latest number)

[@davidbeppler3032]

@@simoc24 Yep, not 10X. Yet. But the Jaguar tested did not have 5 star safety either.

[@teslafudge1585]

It does not require 12 mins to answer this question 😉

[@anthonyc8499]

It took 12 mins for Jonathan Stewart to not mention the $7500 federal tax incentive that Jaguar. Weird that he also didn't use the Performance upgrade package specs for the Y Performance which drops the range to 280mi. Jaguar also boosted range by 8% but left EPA range alone back in January. It's still lame by comparison but it's noteworthy.

[@shuriken4852]

@@anthonyc8499 See my comments elsewhere under this video about key points for the Tesla that he also forgot, so that should equalize things. 😉

[@Cleanerwatt]

Thanks for the clarification. I mentioned specifically in the video that the range was with 19" wheels.

[@anthonyc8499]

@@Cleanerwatt thanks Jonathan but barely anyone gets the Performance Y and only 27% of Model 3 buyers get FSD.

[@Mercilessonion]

@@anthonyc8499 but they have the option of enabling anytime they'd like, they have all the hardware just need to pay the extra money!

[@oldfossil8670]

Hardly a fair comparison. The I Pace is a luxury car / SUV that is a pleasure to drive and can actually go off road. How can Tesla call it an SUV when is can't go off road? - more a SV rather than an SUV. I understand that the Tesla is only available with plastic seats in keeping with its low cost approach. You can have any colour plastic so long as you want black. The I Pace has two types of seat and 4 leather colours as well as cloth. It has 7 types of wheel vs 2 and wider colour choice. Almost no options on the Tesla, not even a HUD! It would be more realistic to compare the Y with the E-Nero surely as another EV taking a low cost approach.

[@thomaszacherl7676]

Well, the I-pace is still my favorite,because it's a "Jag" and it's performance is not bad for the companys first EV! But i don't have the money for either of them. Will be somthing "MadeinChina" in the future. Sorry for my bad english🇳🇴

[@hooverelondono9946]

So why would I pay 20,000 extra for a depreciating notorious unrevialble hunk of jaguar crap

[@Cars-N-Jets]

Hoover E Londono I know right

[@waynerussell6401]

Because it takes Magna longer to make the i-Pace than the e-Pace, even though EVs should be easier to assemble. www.wardsauto.com/ideaxchange/evs-not-easier-build-will-cut-jobs

[@tribalypredisposed]

The I-Pace is manufactured by Magna and there is no evidence of it being unreliable. With a longer wheelbase and good ground clearance, until we get a review of the Model Y off road mode performance we have to assume that the I-Pace is the more capable off road vehicle (which matters to people who actually buy crossover sport utility vehicles for the sport and utility abilities). Also, Jaguar still has the $7,500 tax credit, which cuts the difference down to $12,500. Some people also prefer the I-Pace interior and want buttons and nobs to fiddle with. I think the Model Y is the obvious choice, but I did my best to answer your question and correct a few assumptions you were making.

[@davidpearn5925]

Tesla has the vertical structure, efficiency and affordability of a WMD.

[@tombuckley91]

Are Weapons of Mass Destruction particularly affordable these days? Incredible

[@davidpearn5925]

tombuckley91 .....or maybe disruptive?.

[@medokn99]

what

[@tombuckley91]

@@davidpearn5925 Ah indeed, I would very much imagine said weapon would be somewhat disruptive. Alas, I struggle to find the relevance to Tesla.

[@davidpearn5925]

tombuckley91 so you don’t get the threat to the old world? I’m pretty sure Toyota does.

[@jay-ru-me]

Nobody is paying MSRP for the Jag. I checked one out late last year and as a current Tesla owner they were taking off a total of 16k from the MSRP.

[@MyUniversalUniversity]

That's what I love about dealerships, the price depends on something, not a level field, was 7500 the Fed tax saving part of the 16k?

[@musinclind37]

The range is the big factor here. Charging speed is an equal big factor. Would not even consider the i-fail.

[@goodyKoeln]

@Tesla Dude That’s what most people hate about dealerships. 😇

[@jay-ru-me]

@@MyUniversalUniversity No, 23500 off with the federal tax credit. There was a $6k conquest bonus for Tesla owners IIRC.

[@toddwright662]

@@jay-ru-me At a total of $23,500 of sticker, at least it's getting in the realm of competitive depending on the priorities of the buyer. While the Model Y is better in just about every objective measure, even I like the look of the iPace better and could see some going for it for this reason (even though I know that look diminishes its interior space and wreaks havoc with its efficiency).

[@hellcat1988]

One is overpriced and has limited production potential because of battery production. I wonder. Just doing some quick and dirty math, Tesla could put out a small, two door grocery run style car with a 50KW battery or less and still hit 200 miles of range. Hopefully they'll do that and price it under $20k for those of us holding out for something like that.

[@MrArtist7777]

It's probably not possible with the current battery tech as the price of the battery is too high but Musk has hinted that a

[@DG-uv3zw]

@@MrArtist7777 Price has dropped. Tesla is very close to $100 KWh...

[@user-jt1jv8vl9r]

I would love a small 2nd car just to commute to work; only 16 miles each way. Take Little un the 1.4 miles, (each way: walk when weather is ok), to nursery when the weather is inclement. £15,000 would be a nice price. Don't need FSD or any of that stuff.

[@DG-uv3zw]

@@user-jt1jv8vl9r If you`re in EU there`s now Skoda citigo EV, its pretty much VW e-up so...decent range and nice little car... Price with incentives is also affordable too... Don`t know why there isn't anything like that in US tho...

[@hellcat1988]

@@user-jt1jv8vl9r Then why not look into a used leaf or something? With your requirements, even a poorly maintained leaf with severe battery degradation would be more than enough.

[@loungelizard836]

Jaguar i-pace has adaptive air suspension.

[@ronb4633]

He certainly was not forth coming with features the IPace had that were not even available on the Model Y when he was so detailed on the additional $6k in options you would have to add to the IPace, it's obvious this review is far from neutral, but I am sure that the majority of viewers ate Tesla fans so neutral doesn't matter anyway.

[@GantryG]

I think that the iPace has better off-road abilities; reviews have that part as most impressive (as noted in the video about the upper ground clearance); they invested heavily in that part and may be one of many reasons that it is less efficient at moving.

[@2nd3rd1st]

Crazy to think that they would limit their vehicle's road capabilities to tailor it to the rare cases of off-road driving.

[@user-jt1jv8vl9r]

In the uk the only time people take their vehicles 'off road' is when they accidentally mount the curb at their local supermarket.

[@dzerres]

Nobody is going to take a $70k vehicle off-roading. That's almost laughable. That's why these high priced SUVs are a joke. The biggest among them is the Mercedes G series: $100k and you are going to scratch the paint by going off road and brush past a bush? Nope, not gonna happen. Buy a used Jeep until the Cybertruck comes out.

[@garyco766]

@@dzerres Not to mention the G series are just UGLY. Worst status symbol ever.

[@andrewbolivar3040]

Still, the I-Pace is more attractive than the featureless Odo-faced Model Y, IMO. And you can score one at half the price 4yrs from new. By then you can see if the electric version of a Jaguar is more reliable than a traditional Jag or not. Tesla isn’t the novelty it used to be. The styling used to be attractive, now it’s extremely plain. So yes, please, talk up the Model Y more so I can afford that I-Pace later.😄

[@mcbc5189]

The problem with owning a Tesla is that if you keep it for longer than the warranty then you are truly out of luck because there is NO OEM AFTERMARKET SUPPORT. What this means is that there are no repair shops you can go to that have new Tesla parts to repair your car. You'll have to rely on used parts from salvage Tesla vehicles. Also, when you do decide to sell your Tesla (if you can find a buyer), your "Performance" package or your "Fast Charging" feature will not transfer to the new owner. So basically you will not be able to recoup the expense you paid for those software upgrades (unless of course you sell to an unwitting buyer). But you will incur their wrath when they come back to you with pitchfork in hand because the Tesla you sold them had those software features revoked by Tesla.

[@badran6290]

Obviously model Y much better choice .. But the very low ground clearance is Huge negative for people using "SUV" for what it built for.. 6.6 in only! is that a minivan?!

[@danielthuresson631]

Yes, Tesla gives more value for money. And obviously it has good batteries. But that cheap interior? And that ugly front? And the plain tail lamps? It will look very dated quite soon.

[@MyUniversalUniversity]

Excellent video, Tesla is ahead once again!!

[@shishirsks]

I think, the luxury features of the car has to be discussed as well. For instance, adjustable back seats, seat coolers, massage seats, reading lights etc.

[@nmtb1972]

I will get a Model Y. However, if you compare apples to apples. The Jaguar is much more pleasant environment to be in as a driver. It's an option which is not available on Tesla, yet. They wil get there, but it will take time. Apart from that, agreed, Tesla blows Jaguar out of the water, but they do that against all other premium brands. On the other side of the spectrum, there are some smaller EV's which you would use as a second car for short distances.

[@LeesReviews69]

I wonder if Tesla could ever be stopped? They make the best products ever like Apple. I can’t wait to be playing video games on my iPad while the Cybertruck drives me. Omg

[@AnkurMusiclover]

I pace looks classy though and more like a car not to take anything away from TESLA , Tesla Y is better but bit overhyped

[@fishndive1961]

I saw one for real the other day in a car park. They look a lot better in the photos. Looks like something heavy dropped onto it.

[@AnkurMusiclover]

CGI effects :)

[@mybugatti100]

I would also like to comment on the used market price for these two vehicles. Very low mile 2019 I pace have already dropped 15k+ from MSRP whereas 2019 Model 3 hasn't dropped much value, if at all. This is great news for the model 3 owners that bought new but may present an interesting alternative for someone in the used market. Who knows how much the Jag will drop in value over the next few years, at some point, it may represent a more cost effective purschase. Just a thought.

[@ckgrier2]

For the price, a used i-Pace is a sweet deal. Even Model 3 is dropping in price. www.cargurus.com/Cars/price-trends/Tesla-m112

[@dporrasxtremeLS3]

I really liked this coverage. To me, the support of fast charging and updates is so supportive of Tesla. It makes people really want to take care of their cars. Performance never goes out of style!

[@billcichoke2534]

Until Tesla wants you in a newer car and takes features you paid for away from you. Unlike the Jaguar, you only RENT your Tesla until Elon thinks you should get a newer one. An iPhone is around $1k...a Tesla around $50k. Are you really wanting to treat your car like an iPhone?

[@DarkWing494]

@@billcichoke2534 oh please educate me as model3P owner what have I lost? All I know is I had so much awesome upgrade since I had the car(track mode V2 is latest rage if you haven't heard)

[@carholic-sz3qv]

stop talking nonsense the model y is not an SUV its a hacthback like a prius period

[@bartalian]

So there is an error in your rear headroom comparison. You either swapped the numbers or you misspoke. If the chart is to believed the model Y has 1.3ins more headroom not less. Which is correct?

[@Cleanerwatt]

Thanks for catching that. The Model Y Does indeed have +1.3 inches more headroom in the rear.

[@thewolfdoctor761]

The big advantages of the I-Pace are the $7500 rebate and the ground clearance.

[@albertvasquez6207]

Jag is more car. Sorry ,I drove them both and bought the jaguar

[@KarelleDIY]

*SUMMARY:* Model Y is better and cheaper than I-pace

[@KarelleDIY]

@S M I didn't ask a question about price or comparisons. I made a statement. Everything you stated is basic, common knowledge anyway

[@KarelleDIY]

@S M Ummm too late, I already did get smart.. And yes, I know the statement I made was common knowledge. Just don't know why you felt the need to respond with a long comment when I obviously did not ask a question.

[@KarelleDIY]

@Charles-Antoine Dumoulin LMAO ok says you against the other 20 people that agreed with me

[@KarelleDIY]

@Charles-Antoine Dumoulin LMAO I wasn't trying to "scare" you and Idgaf how many likes you have on other videos.. you're not going to get 1k likes on this comment because most people will agree with me. 😂 Clown

[@KarelleDIY]

People really let these invisible "likes" go to their heads. Why would I care about likes you got on other videos? I wouldn't care if you got more likes here either. Go get some real self esteem @Charles-Antoine Dumoulin

[@DerpyNub]

I have pros and cons in my country There is only 1 supercharger, which is coming soon, BUT the range on model Y is about enough to travel everywhere and back so model Y is a win

[@ianthomas7863]

Looking at your backvlogs, I was correct in my comments on being a tesla infomercial. This whole channel is!!

[@seanz6586]

Ian Thomas LOL....wow. Talk about a snowflake.

[@DarkWing494]

Yet Tesla never have to pay for their advertising unlike all other car company because the product is clearly superior, just look at sale statics or resale value lol.

[@DarkWing494]

@BLACKVIEW USA already have model 3P have you even had time to update on how awesome trackmodeV2 (free and over the air!!!) Or you can just plug your ears in your denial I guess(once again check out the sales numbers that slaps in your face on "no one wants lol)

[@DarkWing494]

​@BLACKVIEW USA try to compare numbers in premium cars space. Dealers don't want them cause they don't need much maintenance for dealers to make their money. But hey if you truely believes in what you saying try shorting the stock now you will get 3X+ more money compare those who were shorting it at $200 dollars LOL

[@venancepretty3742]

@BLACKVIEW USA the world is clearly leaving you behind...stuck firmly in the 19th century.

[@2nd3rd1st]

Another important feature to mention is towing, which the I-Pace offers as an accessory at 750kg in EU and UK, while the Model Y makes no mention of it in any region at this moment.

[@neobow1]

2nd3rd1st at this moment. I agree he should have mentioned it, but he should make it clear that the model y will have an option for towing soon just like the model 3 didn’t have it at the very beginning

[@2nd3rd1st]

@@neobow1 But the Y doesn't even have a point on the body to attach a tow bar, i'm curious how Tesla would fix that

[@neobow1]

2nd3rd1st they will add it. In fact there are photos online of a model y test car with a tow hitch

[@2nd3rd1st]

@@neobow1 Ah very good, ty

[@neobow1]

2nd3rd1st as of today you can order the model y with a tow hitch :)

[@JjJj-ty7iy]

Ok when you did the Tesla model y vs x I was like you deserve a like but now this you got my subscription

[@ItsaB3AR]

RIP Jaguar

[@simoc24]

It’s a B3AR doubt it, actually the I-Pace is doing very well in Europe, especially in UK and Norway (nowhere near as good as Tesla) Many people do not buy car base on any metics, but simply how it looks and feels. Of course Tesla is a lot better and will sell a whole lot more. But I think Jaguar as a brand will survive.

[@My2JZandMe]

That thing was DOA

[@TheDanishSpaceman]

S Cheung Jaguar has already problems delivering I-Pace models due to battery supply limit. This car cannot even be considered a competitor to the 3 or Y if they can only make a few thousands vehicles per year.

[@simoc24]

TheDanishSpaceman I am not comparing the I-Pace to the Y, the video is. I would rather compare it to the X. I am just commenting that Jaguar will survive, especially compare to others such as Daimler and Ford. They came out with the I-Pace sooner than others and will improve upon it. Base on sales number it is NOT an DOA. Of course it won’t sell as well as the Y, may not even be 1/10 of the Y. But Jaguar and the I-Pace will live on. The battery thing is tight for everyone except Tesla. By 2021 there will be a lot more locally made battery in the EU and USA

[@nigo1787]

waouh this comparison is so biaised and unfair. If I get your "comparison points", the Y would also demolish the X, which the I-Pace really competes against. The interior is a LOT more luxurious than on the Y, the drivetrains and suspensions a lot more advanced as well. Also it's a bit "driver-focused" hence the lack interior space, like say a BMW. As for the EPA rating, they are idiotic and don't reflect real-life range at all. The Y is a bit more frugal but it's not that of a difference.

[@ianthomas7863]

I was going to subscribe to cleanerwatt. This was just a tesla infomercial. I have come across the bottom end of car reviews. So sad. Will never subscribe, to watch this rubbish

[@DarkWing494]

Yet Tesla spend zero dollar on marketing

[@marcbungener1877]

I must be really stupid because I agree on the metrics and yet I bought a Jaguar i-pace…the absence of HUD in Tesla is a dealbreaker for me. Also the i-Pace has a fantastic feature Tesla owner can only dream of : shut down completely the central screen when you do not need it. Also It can do proper off road and the fit and fit and finish is nothing to compare, as are the seats confort, with real leather or fabric instead of horrible fake leather…back when the comparison was made one could not get a Model Y with ventilated seat and fake or real leather are really bad in summer if it is not ventilated. One is a luxury driver’s car but it is true than on long trips one will spend more than twice the time charging with the i-Pace than with the model Y. Last but not least some people own both…ask them which one they prefer :=)

[@rdk3996]

Range and S/W: Model Y Features: I-Pace (ventilated seats, leather seats, HUD, more seat adjustments, cabin quietness, stereo upgrade, more color options, more ‘control’ buttons).

[@vincentmarkowicz8285]

So you forgot to talk about scheduled maintence!!! Tesla is every 11k miles. Jaguar is 21k miles or two years.... and the First 60k is covered by Jaguar/Land rover!!! Also, you forgot to talk about service locations. You can find a land rover and jag dealer ship everywhere..... goog luck on finding Tesla service in over 70 percent of the country..... just sayin!!!! This comparison seems uninformed

[@외계인-s8k]

However, Tesla's basic skills as an automobile are too poor. Straight-through speed and insecure autopilot are not everything about cars. And finally, Tesla cars look too cheap.

[@mikfrak]

When I was a young boy the only people buying American cars were scrap metal dealers who dressed like Elvis. They were known disparagingly as 'Yank Tanks' - grossly over-sized impractical cars that wallowed around corners like a hippo walking over a giant mattress. The Teslas are American sedans intended for American suburbia and they tend to have the same 'Yank tank' mentality. One of the senior managers where I work has a model S and it takes up one and a half parking bays with the nose jutting out into road. The model Y has the same problem. The new Tesla pickup would be impossible to park anywhere in Britain. Even large luxury cars like Mercedes and BMWs are far more practical on roads outside northern California. The model 3 is much more sensibly proportioned, but is still very much a US-style sedan, with no hatchback. I agree that the Tesla is a better electric car for technology and efficiency, but unless I was living in Northern California I would go for the Jag. Of course, as I will never be able to afford either, the VW ID3 - or a cheap Chinese copy - looks like the kind of car I will realistically end up with. And as for self-driving, that's a pipe dream I doubt I will see in my lifetime.

[@thephilosopherofculture4559]

This video should have people at Tata, Ford, GM, Mercedes, BMW and PSA (France) panic. But so far, only Volkswagen has panicked, the others think they are too big to fail. Little do they know.

[@skywalker2852]

Many loop-holes in this analysis - I'm a Tesla fan, but their stated EPA range seems to be the most optimistic use of the EPA testing allowances - you then use that overstated range to calculate efficiency. Then you use max charge speed over 15 minutes to determine the miles added when we know the Model Y doesn't sustain 250kW change speeds for 15 minutes - you should be using each vehicle's charge curve

[@taterporkchop]

The comparison depends on how you're using the vehicle. Unless I missed something, the I-Pace can actually do some off-roading. I'm sure it couldn't traverse the Rubicon Trail, but if going off-road is a consideration, the I-Pace has an advantage.

[@odisy64]

The model y is also offroad capable.

[@toddwright662]

@@odisy64 Yeah, but with the the higher clearance of the I-Pace and the air suspension, the I-Pace certainly has an advantage for off-road applications.

[@odisy64]

@@toddwright662 clearance is important but traction control is also and i believe tesla has the best slip detection and output timing. But this only matters on steep surfaces with snow or ice which you dont always encounter but you also dont always require a huge ground clearance if the trail is somewhat even. I offroad in my jeep and its not always the same situation on most trails.

[@toddwright662]

@@odisy64 Fair enough. I don't offroad so I'll take your word and experience for it. I'm in agreement with you that Tesla is likely to have better traction control. I assumed greater ground clearance would be a significant positive factor; maybe somewhat less so than I thought.

[@odisy64]

@@toddwright662 in some trails, ground clearance is the most important thing so in some situations the I-Pace will do better and go where the tesla cant. But both cars will do miserably in a trail that maxes out my jeeps capabilities so consider them both light offroaders but something like a cybertruck would totally shit on my jeep in nearly all conditions except for turn radius and approach/departure angles.

[@thephilosopherofculture4559]

We see this pattern in every model competing with Tesla models. The petrol head designs are worse than Tesla's. If you compare e.g. GM's EV, it becomes incomprehensible why anyone would buy GM at all. Ford has given up. Europe is leaning backwards in smug self-sufficiency, only Volkswagen is panicking as they are the only ones who tried to actually produce an EV and failed miserably. All of a sudden, the combustion car pwer houses discover they are helpless and defenceless against Tesla and Chinese brands. And while Tesla is racing ahead, the petrol heads think of their yearly bonuses and pensions and try to talk Tesla down and use Public Relations shows to persuade people not to buy Tesla but to wait for teir own models, that, if signs are correct, may never come.

[@mikesl1573]

Good review though it does come across as partisan and it occurs to me that Tesla’s biggest problem is Tesla Except for a very few situations why would one buy a model X @ 100k if you can buy a model Y for 50k I think factually your information is nearly correct when comparing Y to iPace but you miss the point An iWatch tells the time just as well as a Cartier, but it is how the Cartier makes you feel and if you are unable to understand that, you are a robot

[@chrisowen2763]

Wow. Anyone would think we’re buying an appliance. Nothing about how they look. Nothing about how they feel. Nothing about how they perform on and off road. I’ll take the Jaguar.

[@dpactootle2522]

$22,845 DIFFERENCE?... you cannot compare them. It's absurd. Model Y wins by an infinite margin.

[@andreyvsjoker]

I really like Tesla but this is such a bullshit video. You only chose the chapters in which Tesla wins. Why don't you talk about interior quality, aspect, features and comfort? Exterior build quality and finish?

[@rj8u]

The best features of I Pace is the ability to take the car off beaten path due to its capability to have air suspensions where the midel y does not. I hope Tesla will add this as a option to model Y in future 👍.

[@golupandey1006]

who will buy such a costly model y then whos interior is so shit. In real world people will accept certain quality from the model y if they are paying too much money as air suspension cost 15000 dollars alone ( its one of the most costly equipments in a car)

[@rj8u]

@@golupandey1006 $15000 for an air suspensions? Is that made in Mars. You can get an aftermarket air suspensions for 3-4k now.

[@golupandey1006]

@@rj8u you dont get what is put on luxury vehicles, better search before commenting. you can also get pretty much anything on after market but they 3rd grade compared to equipment used in luxury cars. you are educated enough to search that.

[@rj8u]

@@golupandey1006 Get back to me when you can actually buy or drive a Tesla before commenting on a car you have experienced 👍. Only stupid person would pay $15000 for an air suspensions 🙉 may be you should be the one educate your self.

[@golupandey1006]

@@rj8u that doesnt change anything

[@travwill]

Y wins overall hands down, but sure wish the quality was up to par. Ys are being delivered with tons of fit and finish defects, interior defects, seal issues, and more. Tesla churns out poor quality overall. We saw this with our S and X purchase as well so guess you have to plan for that. Some things like loose interior ceiling fabric, very poor paint defects and bumps, and horrible gaps are inexcusable even at the Y's price.

[@rdk3996]

Your range numbers are not current. You should indicate what model year you compared abc when the video was made. Pretty sure your not comparing 2022 or 2023 models.

[@andgate2000]

Lot of fanboys here.

[@tiagomatos1484]

Jag all the way for me, the Tesla has a boring look inside and out. The jag just look stunning. Great to see that Tesla will have some really good competitors in the upcoming year.

[@xkrkro]

Funny jags have long been known to have electrical issues with their cars yet fanboys, no in reality haterbots would try to argue their car is better compared to Tesla! No real person would argue against the superiority of Tesla products.

[@elib2956]

In my opinion the ipace is the ugliest ev out there but now it has 253 miles from its 84khw usable battery while the Y has 83kwh and 75 kwh usable or more and its lighter

[@stcredzero]

You realize that MPGe is directly convertible, right?

[@MyUniversalUniversity]

Head room 1.3 should have been a +, or the Tesla number was wrong?

[@Cleanerwatt]

I just added this Correction to the comments (pinned) and description - thanks: The Model Y has +1.3 inches more headroom in the rear (not less as I accidentally put in the chart and mentioned in the video).

[@qaz66666]

I’m from India, i really wanted the model y but since it’s not available i have gone ahead and booked myself an i-pace.

[@palladwr15]

But the Tesla only has black or white seats.. the iPace is a quality car with proper switches. He screens are designed in, not stuck on as an afterthought

[@mondotv4216]

What if you want a binnacle in your Model Y - wait - what do you mean that’s not an option? I’m a Tesla fan but just pointing out that if you’re going to compare features you have to compare everything. I think the Jaguar iPace is probably going to be better built, won’t be subject to Tesla’s restrictive right to repair (eg stopping salvage car owners from DC fast charging). If you own a Jaguar you own it outright. Good thing too because it’s probably more likely to need repairing. I think the cabin of the iPace is a lot nicer place to be. But I’d rather drive the Model Y. So it isn’t as simple as comparing feature for feature.

[@musinclind37]

Range and charging speed make the I-fail the dog!

[@redxsage]

*@MondoTV* -- Tesla's terms of use and warranty statements clearly point out their effectiveness while a car is in service during its lifetime. That _'lifetime'_ ends when aTesla vehicle receives its Death Certificate in the form of a Salvage Title. Tesla has no control of that. The Insurance Company that appraises a vehicle after a wreck determines that it is a _'total loss',_ and part of paying the claim on an insurance policy is seeing to it the car is reported as non operational. The final step is the application of a Salvage Title to said vehicle. Tesla has no obligation whatsoever to offer services of any sort to Salvaged vehicles. Their responsibilty ends the moment a Salvage Title is generated. The vehicle no longer has access to any of the services that were applied to it in the hands of its original owner, who purchased it from Tesla. Anyone who chooses to purchase a Salvaged Tesla from a junkyard auction is rolling the dice. Tesla employs no mechanism to recertify or resurrect a dead car. Nor should they. Just as Ford has nothing to do with the circa 1927 Model T cars that were chopped, modified, and converted into T-Bucket Dragster Hotrods running Chevrolet small blocks decades later.

[@mondotv4216]

redxsage Right. But they also shouldn’t have the right to disable features remotely in the interests of “safety” - what are they - the safety police? Your Mom? They really don’t want you resurrecting old cars because it affects their bottom line - one less Tesla on the road means one more sold. It’s also anti- environmental, an EV without DC fast charging is essentially useless - so that embedded carbon will now go to waste. The more the get like Apple the less I like them.

[@mondotv4216]

musinclind37 so you’ve driven an iPace and your opinion is it’s a dog? Sound like you put a lot of thought into that.

[@fabianomini2775]

The only thing that about me Jaguar is better than Tesla is the line....and a lot better and maybe also the manufacturing

[@danieltan2624]

I though the Tesla looks ugly before now some one looksworst ! Cover my mouth and smiling !