What Quantum Computers REALLY Do

Quantum computers are crazy and have the potential to change how we understand the world around us. I got to go see one with Marques Brownlee recently at IBM. It was wild! But quantum computers are not just better computers. Here’s the analogy that helped me...
If you like fun tech videos, you'll love the full adventure to see a quantum computer with MKBHD! • Quantum Computers, exp...
And if you want to support optimistic tech content, the best thing you can do is subscribe :)
#shorts #technology #quantum #stem

[@p.pranathi2493]

It's fascinating to see how much technology has developed over time.

[@smallSphere69]

Research says 70% of youtube users are government bots. Which are running to keep an eye on users so they can't disobey the elites.

[@martinlutherkingjr.5582]

@r7winyBot/technically illiterate person

[@memorimusic420]

Especially in the last 150 years 😮

[@jatpack3]

You mean like...the wheel?

[@SMUS16475]

I'm telling you. These next 20 years are gonna be a wild ride.

[@MatthewSwartIreland]

That is an encryption algorithms worst nightmare

[@fdisciple7634]

Imagine if IBM already have some working quantum computers and not revealing it. They can pretty break into so many countries systems so easily which really makes it scary. Those countries that are lagging behind in technology is going to be attack and exploited badly.

[@lukasausen]

You can make encryption that is resistant to quantum cracking. Theres a lot of development on that end, also there isnt a way to use them in that way still so we got some decades before normal people would ever get acces to this kind of tech.

[@lassorb4752]

@@lukasausenactually no… there are alot of progress within the field of solid state quant. Comp. Chips!

[@MatthewSwartIreland]

@@lukasausen As far as I am aware the only thing standing between encryption and chaos currently is a few qbits, and from what was released by China we ain't far from that point at the moment. Will bad actors have access to this technology, well that all depends on how you define bad actors, even the thought of the NSA, GCHQ, Chinese SSM or FAPSI, having access to quantum computing with encryption cracking capabilities makes the hairs on my neck stand up. And if you think governments are not going to abuse that kind of power then you are living in a fantasy world

[@kooll2401]

​@Matthew Swart there's already encryption algorithms being made and have bean made to no be easily cracked by qutem computers

[@adrianthoroughgood1191]

The actual quantum computer looks like a normal computer chip. It is hidden inside the canister at the bottom. All the fancy stuff you can see is just the fridge to keep it really cold.

[@whattheschmidt]

Yep, it's kinda absurd to make it look like that anyway too...they put 8 in aesthetics and 2 in function for it.

[@conorstewart2214]

@@whattheschmidt oh yeah they obviously focussed more on looks than on the function of an experimental and expensive device. You ever stop to think it maybe looks that way for a non aesthetics reason?

[@matthewpepper902]

Thanks

[@n8vmilk]

Thanks for sharing that

[@lukasbaker3185]

@@whattheschmidt every picture you see of a dilution refrigerator (this device to keep the chip cold) is when the fridge is open, this is the internal mechanisms of it. When you’re actually running the fridge there are several metal cans that go over this stuff so that the fridge can hold high vacuum, so the cool look is pretty much only visible when you’re not actually doing things with it anyway. They could’ve probably built it uglier, but there’s no point, tons of engineering went into making these fridges as cold as possible.

[@chuckphonhnaboth2678]

A better analogy is this: You have a maze that has 100 different entrances with a single exit point. Binary computers would try each entrance until it finds the correct exit. Quantum computers would go through ALL entrances at once. That is the difference.

[@literate-aside]

Really awesome analogy. Tbf i think the video really missed the mark.

[@adampilarski7083]

I don’t think this is a better analogy; it’s more of an analogy with a different purpose. Your analogy shows how the computers work differently. Her analogy shows how the computers have different end goals.

[@KIDDOUGH]

Excellent description thank you scary though ehh.

[@literate-aside]

@@adampilarski7083 Not really, it perfectly describes both the purpose and methodology of quantum computing. That's what they do and what they're for, explore multiple scenarios simultaneously, and select the best.

[@adamhaj3645]

​@@literate-aside Not really as good in regard to showing why they are good in different type of problems. Because quantum computers work probabilistically, so they have problems with accuracy and are not good for problems where accuracy is important.

[@Forest_Knight]

Strong steampunk vibes in that quantum computer.

[@manjensen1710]

"We've got a steampunk revolution , we're tired of all your so-called evolution We've darted back to 1886 , don't ask us why; that's how we get our kicks Out with the new , in with the old Out with the new , in with the old".

[@beplanking]

​@@manjensen1710Is this a Phineas and Ferb song?

[@adrianthoroughgood1191]

The actual quantum computer looks like a normal computer chip. It is hidden inside the canister at the bottom. All the fancy stuff you can see is just the fridge to keep it really cold.

[@manjensen1710]

@@beplanking Nope, Abney Park song.

[@kingace6186]

For real. I like it.

[@manishnagwan]

The analogy made me forget how quantum processors actually work 🫥

[@CalebTerryRED]

That's probably a good thing. Most of the simple explanations given about quantum computers are wrong, and give people the wrong idea about what they'll be used for

[@monkeytown1239]

@@CalebTerryRED will i be able to finally use 4K reshaders on cyberpunk?

[@saipeor]

Imagine you are trying to find the fastest route from your house to the city. You can take a bus or a train or a taxi. With quantum mechanics we can try all these routes at the same time (creating ghost versions of you that each try a different route. However, the one that reached the city first becomes the real you and the other one disappears. We already see quantum coherence in nature, specifically, in plants during photosynthesis. When light travels to the chlorophyll, it needs to convert photons into energy. There are a lot of different this can happen (pathways) some are better than others. The way we humans do things is try everything and only then choose the best one. Through superposition and other quantum mechanisms, all pathways are carried out simultaneously but the fastest one gets chosen.

[@KIDDOUGH]

Excellent description thank you (still pretty scary)

[@GreyPunkWolf]

Is quantum coherence related to the way thunder behaves ? Like it tries multiple pathways to the ground at the same time until the best path is found and all the particles (energy? Potential ? Idk) go back up and create the big bright scar that we see with our naked eye for a split second. Is that an example of quantum coherence or am I once again venturing in off-topic seas?

[@saipeor]

Lightining just travels by the pricniple of a path of least resistance via ionised air, so we can see it travel realtime. Similarly to how the Japanese used the slime mold to design their train system (the slime mold finds the most efficient path to the food source). So I think that's just classical physics. If Lightning were to behave like it operates with quantum mechanics, it'd appear with a different pattern, maybe we'd see some cool interference of the superposition of charged particles acting like a wave to try to find the most efficient route, but at this point I am also talking out of my ass haha

[@W1NDUR]

Wait, is jizz quantum based????

[@cosmos1487]

​@@GreyPunkWolfnah lightning doesn't travel in each path simultaneously it just travels the path which is shortest Based on classical mechanics

[@devmishra7961]

A suggestion for you, please link the aforementioned video in the comment section, to make it easier to access.

[@crzyces1693]

I was thinking the exact same thing. I simply don't have the time or inclination to search through a hundred videos for the right one. Or I could probably try her name + Quantum Computers...

[@justicecampbell3892]

Its literally 2 clicks lazy ass 🤦🏽‍♀️🤷🏽‍♀️

[@Ryan-cb1ei]

You’d think all these short format videos on every single social media platform would be a little more innovative, but no…

[@trank3166]

It’s in the description. To get to it (at least on mobile) click the 3 dots at the top right and select description. The you will see the link after you click read more

[@luczeiler2317]

imagine what a airplane in the analogy would look like in real life

[@tedkaczynskiamericanhero3916]

Google has made and sent data through a wormhole. Quantum computers are literally going to change reality.

[@atharvabhosale3529]

It would be the same as Boat (quantum computer) because in the analogy its said that "the boat isn't better than a car it's just made for different terrain" so an Airplane isn't necessarily better than boat or car it's used for a completely different thing. So in the analogy they could have compared cars and planes, the method of transport doesn't matter in the analogy what matters is WHERE the transport is used.

[@ominoserzuschauer6286]

​@@atharvabhosale3529 Well planes are faster and can go over every terrain. So yeah they are pretty much superior to cars and boats

[@karasu543]

A N H E L I C O P T E R

[@barrywhite9114]

What’s it like being dead?

[@FisherOfMenParakletos]

Cant really comprehend what a boat is outside of a video game, thanks!!!!!

[@thealvatar6181]

Me when my friends computer won’t load the game: “Hurry yo 1985 Toyota Corolla ass up…”

[@FlaxGalax_FG]

Oh my gosh you guys have such a interesting friend circle.

[@blazebluebass]

Quantum computers been in development for a long time. Meanwhile everyone got steamrolled by AI out of nowhere.

[@SavantGardeEX]

Quantum computers can make AI a billion times better... Trust me.

[@MrPaxio]

well.... AI has been in development since movies a long time ago

[@joselucnico]

Although her documentary is interesting and well interpreted, I can't help but see Nathalie Portman. 🤔

[@vigigy484]

This is such a good explanation. I saw a lot of videos like „Running (insert game name) on maxed out video settings on a quantum computer“ or something. No, you can’t run games on this type of computer! Its like trying to drive with a boat on a street. You can put the boat there but it can’t move.

[@nexusinc.4367]

Now when will computers be PLANES? what about SPACESHIPS?!?

[@bungayanoop00]

No.QC are planes ,Not boats. Anoop Bungay

[@nicolafiorillo4048]

This is wrong, given enough time a normal computer can solve any problem that a quantum computer can solve, the problem is that it would need too much time

[@eddie1975utube]

Cleo, your channel is so refreshing. Keep it coming. All the best to you!

[@AgentKryos]

Yea... Quantum computers are cool and all... But can it run Crysis? Or day 1 Cyberpunk 2077? Maybe Skyrim or Fallout 4 with 100 mods?

[@rolandjohnson8471]

That's a really good analogy - everything has its place. Quantum computers aren't the be all end all for parallel processing, there are FPGAs too, but they're better at different kinds of parallel processing

[@davedsilva]

Her boat anology is bad. She is confusing unskilled quantum computer programmers with what a quantum computer can do. Looking at how a leaf performs photosynthesis through quantum effects, a more accurate analogy is an infinite number of faster moving cars trying all path combinations simultaneously, figuring out what works best.

[@darmakusuma891]

So, basically... We ditched the road all together by switching to quantum computer, eh?

[@mycabbages_]

I think it's more like we now have the option of going places the road can't take us. We still need the road, but now we can also explore the ocean

[@eddie1975utube]

Where we’re going we don’t need roads.

[@darmakusuma891]

@@mycabbages_ your response is simple yet very understandable. Thank you!

[@adrianthoroughgood1191]

​@@eddie1975utube when I saw the OC I immediately thought of that and came here to say it, but it had already been said!

[@BruceNewhouse]

You are addictively good at presenting difficult concepts and understanding them. Regarding your upbeat and spunky perspective and personality, stop it. I can’t maintain my grumpiness and seriousness when I hear and see you. It is real annoying 🤪

[@Fancyfacts660]

Our next leap into the future 😊

[@NeroDefogger]

ah yes so "they will be so powerful and cool!" stopped working because people were realizing nothing was being improved so you changed it to "they are for different things!" well it sucks for you but I have memory and the ability to remember, sorry not sorry! stop this scam

[@Yeoldvictoriansloth]

She is literally the real life Jane Foster

[@StreamComedyShorts]

Try running cyberpunk 2077 with max settings

[@kevinkidderphotographer]

That thing is a work of art

[@mileshul]

so actually quantum computers are at the age as same where today's computers were 200 years ago i.e. the analytical engine and difference engine kinda things..hope it dont take 200 years to come into our hands..

[@shankerram3]

that’s the worst analogy i have ever heard

[@ante5544]

I've heard worse, but this one definitely wasn't good

[@NJplays72]

I just watched a guy blow up 5 million tnt on minecraft on one of these computers and it did nothing

[@LilithOfTheNephilims]

Ok but can it run Minecraft at 60 FPS?

[@Hello-jh1rq]

No

[@tdm3bros]

am I the only one who's surprised that one of her friends is MKBHD??

[@shreddedtwopack6625]

I prefer tl think of quantum computing as cloning myself. There are two ways of speeding up computation: actually getting faster or doing things in parallel. Quantum computers are just really good at doing things in parallel.

[@ScalarYoutube]

I'd say that a quantum computer is more like a train, it will be almost as capable and better than cars at most stuff, but requires much more infrastructure and has different strengths and weaknesses (flat plains Vs mountains).

[@youngblood5434]

Soooooooo... can it run crysis?

[@Rudxain]

Imagine DOOM 💀

[@Hello-jh1rq]

Unfortunately it cannot 😂

[@PSBrathwaite]

This is incorrect. You can also compute the same equations faster. For a tech person, you’re not very smart.

[@JesusGonzalez-gr9wz]

Is it me, or Cleo actually gets prettier in every new video that she uploads?

[@Slipperiest]

Can you just collab with sciencephile the AI and solve all problem in this world lol

[@friedpancakes266]

A computer has 2 values, 1 and 0. A quantum computer has 1, 0, and every value in between

[@h1there35]

So like 1.1 and 1.0003? Cuz those are in between 1 and 2.

[@joehiggins7583]

Has 1 and zero at the same time...untill it's observed

[@h1there35]

@@joehiggins7583 so like that one cat in the box wit the poison?

[@Loganscarz]

More specifically a transistor is used to build a cpu. Classical computers have transistors. Transistors can only hold values of 1 and 0 but only one at a time. Like they can either hold one or zero not both. Quantum bits or qubits are what make up quantum computers. Qubits are able to hold a superposition of two values 1 and 0. This makes quantum computers able to solve certain problems a lot faster than classical computers but there are still limitations in which a classical computer does not have. For example, classical computers are faster and more efficient than quantum computers at solving arithmetic problems.

[@Angelxnxhdhxhcjc]

How many frames can I get playing with that bad boy on Minecraft

[@NaushadAli-wc4gj]

it is a simplified version of how a quantum computer can solve certain types of problems much faster than a classical computer. In the maze example, a classical computer would have to explore each path in the maze one by one to find the exit, which can take a long time if there are many paths to explore. However, a quantum computer could use a technique called quantum parallelism to explore all possible paths at once, which can significantly speed up the search process. Quantum parallelism is a property of qubits that allows them to exist in multiple states at the same time. In the maze example, a quantum computer could represent all possible paths as a superposition of states, and then use quantum interference to amplify the probability of finding the correct path while canceling out the probabilities of finding incorrect paths. This can lead to a much faster search process than a classical computer. It's important to note, however, that quantum parallelism is not a magic bullet that can solve all problems faster than classical computers. It only works for certain types of problems, such as optimization and search problems, and even then, it requires careful algorithm design and implementation to take advantage of the quantum parallelism. For other types of problems, such as basic arithmetic or simple logic operations, classical computers are still faster and more efficient.

[@poryg5350]

If I simplify your explanation, A quantum computer is great for multi-threaded operations while a table computer is more than sufficient for singlethreaded operations.

[@patchesconway5957]

It's A crap load of money so making it work is or isn't. Just figure it out faster.

[@nklinef]

Quantum computers are at best imprecise probability calculators and at worst random number generators. Their ONLY purpose is to give you ALOT of WRONG answers VERY quickly.

[@Coastfog]

Thanks for your expertise, Mehlan Turing.

[@watashneu]

A Truly random number generator would be pretty great advancement, and reality at a quantum level is more accurately described by probability functions anyway, so that`s two positives.

[@jan-lukas]

​@@watashneuif you want true randomness just measure radiation in the atmosphere or the impetfectly manufactured parts of your CPU. For everything we need the first and for most thing the second as well are enough

[@justaneedlessboi6710]

​@@watashneuat least in the foreseeable future

[@the_cheese_cultist]

a valid quantum algorithm has at least a 2/3 chance of working (this is how it's defined). then you can simply repeat the algorithm to get an arbitrarily low error probability.

[@turnipaitor]

But can it run Minecraft?

[@pokefan5022]

As someone who works in IT. A quantum computer is just a faster regular computer. It is the software that uses the computer that makes the difference.

[@arnavrajsingh44]

Are ya even listening to yourself mate ?? If you worked in IT, you woudn't say IT but a specific industry. Maybe I'm wrong, but this reply isn't to someone who is right. Just saying...

[@pokefan5022]

@@arnavrajsingh44 are you nuts? How many people out there tell others “I work with Cisco Meraki” and people understands what that means??? Anyone knows that when you work in this industry, you just say “IT” when not sure if anyone will understand you. If you don’t know that much, then you are probably still on Win 95.

[@PRESIDENT_RAY]

555 CLAIMED AND RECOGNIZED BY THE GREATEST ONEEE

[@mapu1]

Yea, but most quantum computers right now are at the point of vacuum tubes for regular computers. Unless you have house sized refrigerator, you ain't actually doing anything with it that you couldn't do with a low end calculator.

[@3333-c6l]

She looks like Natalie Portman, right?

[@LandonAshworthDirects]

Congrats on your face

[@Martinlavell]

Did she leave anyone else more confused than before?

[@PixelatedB]

So a quantum computer wouldnt run fortnite bettter

[@justicecampbell3892]

The only time I've heard about quantum computers was in Flash and Arrow lmao I thought it was a made up concept 😂

[@justaneedlessboi6710]

The concept isn't made up but the computers that we do have now are extremely unreliable and noisy, very likely building reliable ones is impossible

[@justicecampbell3892]

@@justaneedlessboi6710 Ahhh, got it. Thanks!

[@Cuber1771]

We went from physical computers to digital ones and now quantum

[@MrRaja]

No ASICs are boats, QC is the all encompassing sky and sees everything and nothing at the same time.

[@VivekYadav-ds8oz]

I'm more interested in how it will help us solve NP-Hard problems, that have exponentially large time complexities, since they can literally explore more possibilities simultaneously, right? Imagine solving Travelling Salesman, traffic would improve sooo much.

[@the_cheese_cultist]

it is an unsolved problem whether quantum computers are computationally stronger than classical computers (up to a complexity class)

[@NaushadAli-wc4gj]

It is believed that quantum computers have the potential to solve certain NP-hard problems much faster than classical computers. NP-hard problems are a class of problems that are difficult to solve using classical computers. They involve finding the best solution among a vast number of possible solutions, and the computational resources required to solve them grow exponentially with the size of the problem. Quantum computers have the potential to solve some of these problems faster than classical computers by using a technique called quantum annealing, which involves finding the lowest energy state of a physical system that represents the problem. This technique has been shown to be effective for certain types of optimization problems, such as the famous traveling salesman problem. However, it is not yet clear whether quantum computers can solve all NP-hard problems, or even a majority of them, faster than classical computers. There are still many technical challenges that need to be overcome, such as scaling up the number of qubits and reducing errors and noise in the system. even if quantum computers can solve certain NP-hard problems faster than classical computers, it is still an open question whether the speedup is significant enough to make a practical impact on real-world applications.

[@Barry-the_bruiser]

Still not enough to run forspoken at a stable frame rate

[@SlinkySmith59]

But!... can you play DOOM on it?

[@D-Man_Jam]

wheres its 4090 lol

[@1991saad]

So these do not operate on 0s and 1s? I think it might be just hoax

[@FatherFH]

That combined with AI is our end.

[@Viosmart]

Very nice background music! What is it?!!!!!! Pls!!!!

[@TECHNOofc]

this explanation just confused me more when she referenced boats. I thought she was going to say plane

[@ralphfranco]

Why don't they use this technology to figure, configure, map and encode DNA? It is the perfect tool to map our DNA and correct erroneous genetics. Oh of course no one will mention that because it would be the fix for all types of genetic conditions.

[@o_psicopato]

That's cool and all, but can it run Doom?

[@jan-lukas]

Not yet, but probably soon 😂

[@johnlundholm7714]

Literally made a shot that got you wondering what it would do then didn’t tell you what it would do…

[@dimitrioskaragiannis1169]

Very interesting analogy about the differences between classical and quantum computers 😊👌

[@SherKhanShani]

After watching this video I totally understand nothing about Quantum Computers 😕

[@aforashish7]

I still don't understand what quantum computer do.

[@recess7]

One question: are you the girl from Thor?

[@etyrnal]

nothing explained. like 99pct of 'explanations' about quantum

[@r-craft3378]

This is an over simplification. Silicon computers run off of binary(0,1) while quantum computers run off of a different system(0,1,1 and 0, neither 0 or 1) letting them run 4 times faster and efficiently

[@NaushadAli-wc4gj]

1.A classical computer is like a very smart calculator that can do lots of calculations very quickly. It uses tiny electronic switches called transistors to store and process information. These switches can be either "on" or "off," which represents the binary digits, or bits, that computers use to represent information. A quantum computer, on the other hand, uses tiny particles called quantum bits, or qubits, to store and process information. Unlike classical bits, which can only be either "on" or "off," qubits can exist in multiple states at the same time. This property is called superposition, and it allows quantum computers to perform many calculations at once, which is why they can be much faster than classical computers for certain tasks. Another property of qubits is called entanglement, which means that two qubits can be connected in a way that their states are always linked, no matter how far apart they are. This allows quantum computers to perform calculations that are impossible for classical computers to do. In summary, a classical computer is like a very fast calculator that uses bits to store and process information, while a quantum computer uses qubits that can exist in multiple states at the same time and can be entangled to perform calculations that classical computers cannot. 2.quantum computers are very difficult to build and operate. Qubits are very delicate and can be easily disturbed by their environment, making them hard to control and maintain. They require very careful cooling and shielding from external interference, which adds to the cost and complexity of building and operating a quantum computer. quantum computers are not good at all computing tasks. While they excel at certain types of problems, such as optimization and simulation, they are not necessarily faster than classical computers for every task. In fact, for some tasks, such as basic arithmetic or simple logic operations, classical computers are still faster and more efficient.

[@debojyoti3550]

I didn't know that Natalie Portman was a part-time scientist too.

[@aresnir2725]

Have you seen Thor movie?

[@clashingemperors8280]

She is more like. JOURNALIST NOT a scientist lol

[@trevorhook5677]

So, boat can't go on road?

[@skylineblack2000]

Incorrect metaphor

[@sweeper1977]

Instead of saying "not JUST faster" you should just say "not faster" than conventional computers. Otherwise it is borderline scam.

[@babbimamgain]

After watching this short.. it reminds me... I should be making my own quantum computer and then wasting my time watching videos...

[@bropeep07]

Honestly, just put the word 'quantum' in front of anything and it sounds cool. I ate some quantum spaghetti for dinner.

[@Sin_Purple]

But can it run Doom?

[@rodnee2340]

Don't touch it! You will end up like Ant Man and disappear into..... ""the quantum realm"""..😬

[@Vishnuuprasad]

My doubt about quantum computer is if qbits are 1's and 0's at same time them imagine if i ask 1+1=2, true or false, and 1= true and 0 = false...... Normal computer gives 1 what will the quantum computer out put be like? True false?? I dont get it how u can calculate something with 1 amd 0 at same time, its like 2*3=? And quantim computer just lists - infinity to + infinity insterd of giving 1 ans.... Plz explain

[@Casual-Yohoho-Enjoyer]

Can it run Doom tho?

[@Alexxalla]

Can it run Doom tho?

[@DonnieToys]

For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. (Romans 6:23) Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light. (Matthew 11:28-30) I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. (Luke 13:5) For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. (Romans 10:13)

[@michaelgarrow3239]

Absolutely the worst explanation of quantum computing I have ever heard…

[@greymatt3r819]

Quantum computers are over hyped, they are difficult to scale and expensive to run. They have also been completely surpassed by the Dynex neuromorphic supercomputer. Quantum computing systems have achieved Q-scores not surpassing 140, Dynex's supercomputer exceeded 15,000!!

[@anantmalik]

Basically, computers navigate an area of math. Quantum computers can uncover not-before-known areas in math. A new world (Dr. Eric Selvig said this line in Avengers ... 😊)

[@livewellwitheds6885]

I find it super interesting that quantum computers do not rely on binary code! it's definitely a whole new kind of technology

[@lme918]

I disagree with boat analogy. They are airplane ✈️️. For finding local/global minimum(solution) you have to go/ride step by step. Airplane can just flew and see where that's local/global minimum is. That's how it's powerful.

[@nolanpearce6152]

Can it run crysis?

[@martingrant1960]

☆SWEETHEART,YOU COULD INFORM THE AUDIENCES A TRUER FACTS,AS FOLLOWS! QUATUMS ARE LIKE OLE' TRANSITERS AND NEW SUPER COMPS OF OUR FUTURE ARE ATOMIC! TRUE,SEXY LADY! COUNTRIES NOW IN SUPER HIGH TECH RACES IN GETTING BEYOND JUST ONE ALGARYTHEM!!! GREAT VIDEOS,LADY,YOU'RE AYE-OKAYE!!! TY!!!🌻🐧👍🐿🎶

[@CH-vb5kr]

Quantum Computers are way so early in their evolution/development: at present, they look more like Difference Engines than Computers. If civilisation advances for another 100 years (I don't think it will), I expect Quantum Computers will look as different from how they look at present as the Difference Engine does from a modern PC.

[@mandarbamane4268]

Maybe I disagree over this analogy. From my view, If today's classical computers are faster and faster cars to explore world faster, Then quantum computers is like making your multiple copies which simultaneously can explore the world.

[@ВасянНирванов]

i got it! quantum computers didn't made for computing! they are boats!

[@mohamedyasser2068]

that's true, quantum computers aren't replacement of traditional computers, they are just better at some tasks that modern day computers can't solve, however most of the tasks that our computers do are so hard for quantum computers, and quantum computers are very slow doing them or can't do at all

[@allowmi]

What is the purpose of the architecture (physical form) of the quantum computer? (I'm mindful of the reveal of the spacecraft in Close Encounters of the Third Kind.) I'm guessing it has to do with some cold temperatures, but that's a guess...

[@markwhat3637]

Tomorrow, "Hey everyone, I made an app with my quantum computer." Everyone, "What does it do?" , "I don't know, but all of society is built around it now! Where's my millions?"

[@emilmullerv3519]

I really the emphasis you put on this, many people (particularly in silicone valley) believe that quantum computing it's just gonna be a solution for everything when it really isn't. Quantum computing has some algorithms that reduce NP problems to P problems, but this is in itself doesn't mean every NP problem can be reduced to a P problem, nor that the reduction is useful, we can end up with a galactical algorithm that is only faster than the traditional one at HUUGE quantities that we will never need. That is not to say that QC is useless, the problems we DO know can be solved significantly faster are important problems in science and could be a significant step up for biology, medicine, physics and even some experimental math problems. It's just that QM aren't gonna be used by the general public, in reality, even with QM becoming more common, it's likely only researchers in a particular field with clear intentions will ever get to use a QM on a regular basis