Lisa Randall - Are there Extra Dimensions?

[@david.thomas.108]

She explains complex things so simply and clearly. Obviously such complexity is well understood by her. Another great video!

[@lordemed1]

Dr Randall- what a pleasure to listen to- unpretentious, gracious, and brilliant.

[@carlrs15]

is someone restocking shelves in the background?

[@sarahallenhumboldt2638]

Good point; very distracting.

[@FoshayActual]

It's just noise from the extra dimensions

[@spiritzweispirit1st638]

@@FoshayActual - Extra Dimensions Seeking Attention' 'Typical' Happens Alot' They'll Grow Out of It' 😶✌

[@Peppersfirst]

It's a Russian spy. Why was Tartarie removed from the world maps? The Tartarian Empire was erased from history.

[@YusufGinnah]

That's one of the other dimensions.. Just dropping into the video...

[@HawthorneHillNaturePreserve]

Lisa Randall is so easy to listen to. Intelligent, precise speech that is still easy to hear. Love this interview.

[@paulwharton1850]

God, she's brilliant ! What a fabulous conversation - Great questions and Lisa Randall answers everything in such an easy to understand way. Many thanks for making the video.

[@matthewyabsley]

OK. She can come to my birthday party...

[@SpotterVideo]

Eph 3:18 May be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height;

[@MrArdytube]

Yes, brilliant is what I was thinking too. And great clarity as well. Simple, without being condescending or simplistic

[@Denverdude7]

@@MrArdytube and she's fit

[@sunvalleydrivemusic]

One of my fave episodes! I love how she explained while inserting questions to her answers.

[@jbghumanjr]

Linda Randall - "Gravity is the one we (know) has to be there..." vs the things we've yet to discover. Very insightful human.

[@AsttoScott]

I was thinking the same, like she had no idea what she was talking. Kinda looked like she didn't want to be there.

[@CallMeA6]

High priest dogma?

[@michaeljones7465]

Yes, gravity is a functional dimension.

[@christhomson9170]

@Islayman and of course the physicists would say the information is false. How could they admit he was more intelligent then them all. And you would witness what they would be developing with their science and dissection of the natural world. Take some bufo and you will see that universal compression and expansion is the real force in a pressurized system, moving and binding the strings and coding in the 10 dimensional field. And Newton’s theory of heliocentricity and law of universal gravitation is wrong and the next idea you would think is this guys a flat earther and then again you’d be wrong about me and gravity. But you are not wrong, just on your own cognitive evolutionary stage and neurotransmissional state or speed that is building your-conscious code.

[@Animosity716]

Isn’t gravity a theory?

[@coleparker]

I have to give it to the interviewer. I would not even know where to begin asking intelligent questions to Professor Randall about this subject.

[@shanghunter7697]

I appreciate her professional language, words like "suppose, could be, some people would say, theory, there maybe, might be, possibility, we don't know". We ARE uncertain of many things in academia but we "think" we know much more, we are an arrogant bunch and know very little in the grand scheme of things. True story.

[@swervedriver5260]

And they give each other awards like trophies and money on theories. Along with books, TV shows, speaking engagements, tenurship, etc. Pushing theory as fact, only to drop it for a new one. If we doubt, question or criticize the theory, WE get ridiculed and criticized. Tesla (a real scientist) declared an 'ether' exists! Invented wireless transmission, and the Higgs Boson partical proved it. Where is his trophy and money? For decades scientists have denied spirituality as something real, yet they have CERN, where the statue of an ancient god looks on. CERN first opened with a spiritual inauguration. "Science is a sacred cow" - Anthony Standen (Scientist)

[@danerobbable]

​@@swervedriver5260 but let’s be clear. Anything that humans can use to create a smoke screen to deny the existence of the Creator of multiple dimensions - some of which were ‘donated’ to us for whatever purposes - who is God. Man is so busy trying to not admit inadequacy and to blot out a supreme God means that any old thing will do.

[@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace]

words like that fill the science space in theire dimentions.

[@Isawwhatyoudid]

yeah, science is SUCH a hoax

[@estuchedepeluche2212]

“True story”? Do you mean “we suppose that this is a true story”?

[@VagabondMorrison]

I have a great appreciation for Lisa Randall’s contributions, particularly her work on extra-dimensional theories like the Randall-Sundrum model. This framework explores the possibility that our universe is a 4-dimensional brane embedded in a higher-dimensional bulk, providing a creative approach to solving the hierarchy problem by proposing that gravity’s weakness could be explained by its ability to “leak” into extra dimensions. It’s an elegant hypothesis that has inspired extensive research in particle physics and string theory, and it has spurred experiments aimed at finding evidence of Kaluza-Klein (KK) particles. However, despite its influence, the theory has faced challenges in terms of empirical support, as no direct evidence for extra dimensions or KK particles has emerged from high-energy experiments like those conducted at the LHC. This reliance on unobserved, speculative constructs highlights a key limitation: the theory’s testability is currently constrained by our technological capabilities and the speculative nature of extra dimensions themselves. In contrast, my wave-based theory of gravity offers a grounded alternative that does not rely on higher-dimensional constructs but instead posits that gravity emerges as a scalar, frequency-based wave phenomenon. Rather than viewing gravity purely through the lens of spacetime curvature, I propose a model where gravitational interactions arise from the resonant interference patterns of a quantized wave field. This approach not only integrates more seamlessly with quantum mechanics but also provides a direct, testable link to observable data. By framing gravity as an emergent wave phenomenon, the theory avoids the pitfalls of relying on speculative particles or dimensions, offering a more parsimonious and empirically grounded framework. To establish the robustness of this theory, I have gone beyond conceptual exploration and have rigorously developed a full mathematical framework, complete with detailed equations and testable predictions. I have derived specific, quantifiable effects that differ from those predicted by General Relativity, such as frequency-dependent gravitational lensing and distinct patterns in gravitational wave data. These predictions are not speculative in nature; they are grounded in empirical physics and can be tested with current observational technologies, such as the Hubble Space Telescope, LIGO, and the upcoming James Webb Space Telescope. In terms of empirical validation, I am currently working with data from the Hubble archive and other astronomical sources to test these predictions. I am conducting a series of analyses comparing the observed gravitational lensing effects across different frequencies to the theoretical predictions outlined in my model. Additionally, I am exploring the possibility of identifying unique resonance signatures in the gravitational wave data collected by LIGO, which would provide a critical empirical test for the wave-based nature of gravity as posited by my theory. Unlike many alternative models, including Randall’s, my approach emphasizes falsifiability and empirical testability. I have structured the theory to make clear, specific predictions that can be validated or refuted with existing data, rather than relying on hypothetical constructs that may remain unobservable for the foreseeable future. This focus on empirical evidence and testable predictions not only strengthens the theory but also positions it as a viable competitor to current paradigms, including General Relativity and extra-dimensional theories. I am currently preparing a comprehensive paper detailing the full theoretical framework, mathematical derivations, and empirical predictions for submission to [insert journal name]. My goal is to engage with the scientific community at the highest level, presenting a theory that is not only conceptually innovative but also rigorously grounded in empirical science. I welcome dialogue, critique, and collaboration, as I believe that true progress in theoretical physics requires both rigorous testing of new ideas and a willingness to challenge the limitations of existing models. In summary, while I respect the creativity and influence of Lisa Randall’s work, I believe my wave-based theory of gravity offers a more parsimonious, empirically grounded, and testable alternative. By avoiding speculative constructs and focusing on observable predictions, I aim to provide a framework that not only aligns with our current understanding of physics but also offers a pathway to new discoveries that could reshape our understanding of gravity itself.

[@roseyg7064]

What type of formal training in physics do you have?

[@VagabondMorrison]

@@roseyg7064 I'm highly cited and have published to many journals. If unified theories of cosmology is your thing I highly encourage you to read my extensive body of peer-reviewed work. David A Morrison

[@Razrman]

Her voice is so soothing. Makes listening to such profound topics pleasurable.

[@JourneyToTheTruthandTR]

Isn't it strange how she sort of looks like Jodi Foster from the movie Contact?

[@faustosoto7584]

JourneyTotheTruthandTotalRandomness You read my mind !!

[@schmiggidy]

Not only how she looks, but her facial mannerisms - her squareish features, clipped clinical style of speech, the way she purses her lips together and refuses to ever let them relax when she speaks. More accurately, a Silence of the Lambs "Clarice" version of Jodie Foster, I'd say.

[@user-sl1tg3eb9q]

Why is that strange?

[@outsideworld76]

Lol... Yeah I agree

[@1973vanguard]

Son of a bitch, you beat me to it lol! I'm watching this now and thought the exact same thing. And what's ironic is she's speaking about science and extra dimensions lol!

[@leewilton5082]

She simplified a complex field of study and made it accessible to the rest of us.

[@justinpridham7919]

Yet extra dimensions remain inaccessible.

[@skywalker7778]

Prof. Randall is such a wise woman - could listen to her for years 👍🏻

[@tdevil101]

It’s scary how brilliant she is.

[@hongry-life]

Wise? Or imagination?

[@mra9248]

@D L Luke uh?

[@Thesortvokter]

Really? She's not exactly laying an emphasis on sounding clear. She's mumbling half the time.

[@91722854]

Judging from her solitary life and fully dedicated to theoretical physics, she resembles Nikola Tesla, only thing as we do not know is if she also has a pigeon lover, or may another kind of animal?

[@fourtrees44]

We need more people like her.

[@leeedwards7721]

IS Matthew McConaugnhey pushing book's out in the background to PROVE SOMETHING SCOOBS UK.

[@uremove]

I’m pleased Prof. Randall made reference to “Flatland”, and the possibility that we might be able to detect the effects of extra dimensions eg. on gravity. Spacial dimensions are hard enough to visualise, but what about extra dimensions >1 of time? What would 2D, 3D or 4D time be like? Is that even possible? I realise many Physicists regard time as an emergent, non fundamental concept.

[@uremove]

Phoenix I take your point about our limited senses being suited for 3D not 4D perception. However, I think that’s a technical limitation of the thought experiment. What I like about Flatland is that when Mr Square is wafted up into the air, and into the 3rd dimension, he can perceive the whole of his former 2D world all at once. He has gained a total meta-perspective on his former 2D reality. Many arguments in religion, politics, philosophy etc. are like this, with different sides having 2D-like partial perspectives, while the synthesis (the holistic truth) is a 3D meta-perspective where one finally sees the faceted truth of all the different sides at once. I also think some people have ineffable & noetic ‘unitive’ experiences, (which may be just a trick of the brain), but which sound rather similar to Mr Squares 3D experiences! Just as an aside, I think you may have condemned poor Mr Square to a 1D prison existence! Don’t forget, he is able to perceive length AND depth, so he would see more than a series of lines of varying lengths - they would vary in depth/distance as well. We recognise a 3D ball as a sphere, even though we can’t see the back, and so it’s probably not unlikely a 2D entity in Flatland would similarly recognise a circle from his partial view of a line curving away from him.

[@stebolian]

Spatial

[@uremove]

stebolian LOL! You say potato and I say potato?😉 www.thefreedictionary.com/spacial

[@timhallas4275]

Time is an abstract mathematical tool. It serves a purpose, but without math, it simply doesn't exist.. Ask yourself how did our ancient ancestors first visualize time? The phrase 4 moons, comes to mind. Without the number 4,, there is no concept of time. It's 4 X 28 days, by the way. The length of the day is an arbitrary value.. isn't it? Time is a mathematical expression of a ratio of motion (a) to motion (b).

[@timhallas4275]

Flatland is an exercise in abstraction, same as 4 dimension land. It cannot exist, therefore we have to create it in our imagination. The concept of people living in a 2 dimensional world is already absurd. Speculating that they would be unaware of the third dimension points to the absurdity of the idea. WE created the mathematical formulae that describe our universe. The fact that there is height , width, and depth in our physical reality did not require our brain to make it so. On the other hand, a 4th dimension requires a brain to imagine it. The 4th dimension is no more real than the gods.

[@terrywbreedlove]

She is so good explaining these complicated ideas in a way that even I can understand. Give her the Gold

[@paulwharton1850]

Really great to watch. I learnt a lot. The interviewer asked good questions and did not interrupt Ms. Randall (unlike so many other interviewers, thank God !) Many thanks......all the way from London.

[@stephenpuryear]

check 3:08

[@PainfulRenegade]

overall seen Sherlock...

[@30guarino]

4:00

[@eugene7518]

1D, 2D, 4D do not exist

[@eugene7518]

Flatlanders have only a side view. They can't notice where length and width meet. Therefore everything appears as an imaginary line. Cause they can't stand over a shape, to see the shape. That's only possible in 3D.

[@001Geoff]

Trying to explain extra dimensions to someone is like trying to explain the concept of colour to someone born blind. You have to be of a certain mindset to fully comprehend it.

[@mangoryder7139]

Geoff Wall-Davis dead on point !,

[@juliegill4679]

👍🏻

[@001Geoff]

Don't understand your reply?

[@kimanicross1263]

Your right

[@edwardandrade4390]

I agree most probably got lost in the first minute of explaining

[@michaelstagg6571]

I appreciate Lisa in 2 dimensions, I would enjoy the opportunity to experience this lovely lady in 3 dimensions!

[@nsjx]

Great explanations. She makes mention of Flatland, but the 2D character first experiences the sphere entering and leaving his space in Sphereland. And yes, if you haven’t read the books then I highly recommend you do 👍🏽

[@shjobsearch2195]

Dr. Randall is an important voice presenting and summarizing complex research to laypersons like me.

[@Oktoday-1]

But a very poor speaker and the way she repeats common thought in a strained way? She would be better in the research department?

[@eugene7518]

1D, 2D, 4D do not exist.

[@partiallyhydrogenatedsaffl1366]

I read this lady's books when I was 12 she absolutely blew my mind off

[@ronaldbarrett1506]

Great to hear & learn from such a person as Dr. Lisa Randal. Thank you.

[@chasing_dragons]

Very nice interview. What comes to mind over and over again is if these dimensional and quantum subjects are related to the paranormal and extraterrestelrial phenomenon in some way.

[@eugene7518]

1D, 2D, 4D do not exist.

[@uncleouch9795]

This is one of the correct people to ask this question.

[@outsideworld76]

Never heard of her before.

[@thetherorist9244]

they make up dimensions....you can too...lol.. example...in this dimension there is 24 hours in a day, in another theoretical dimension (imaginary) there are 47 hours in a day. Now build an entire world model around that and you have a new theoretical time dimension....and they get payed for that!

[@chile_en_nogada2090]

@@thetherorist9244 nooo. They are trying to explain gravity and why little particles dont act the same way as big particles do. These 2 are very important questions.

[@thetherorist9244]

@@chile_en_nogada2090 hahahahahaha......hold on....bwahahahahahah

[@chile_en_nogada2090]

@Omnipresent Spirit hey i appreciate the Video. I will watch it when i can. (Right now im traveling) thank you very much!

[@alanoffer]

Sounds like someone is trapped in another dimension nearby and they are trying to get out

[@makedredd299]

Alright alright alright... - Matthew McConaughey 👨‍🚀

[@NorthGermanic]

@@makedredd299 Rofl! Good one.

[@bethymears2648]

Tell them to go back the way they came.

[@Tsobanian]

@ reffoelcnu alouncelal -> Well tell me about it... What the hell?

[@tdevil101]

In all honestly, I’d be too intimidated to have a simple conversation with her because she is too abnormally brilliant. Her credentials are impeccable.

[@seanmolloy9297]

@@YearsOVDecay1 Uhhm..........What!??!

[@richardduplessisrick1703]

The only problem she has is proving these dimensional theories.

[@jeffreychandler8666]

A very brilliant lady that I can listen to all day. Listening to Dr. Randall, I am inclined to think of Salvador Dali's paintings.

[@eugene7518]

1D, 2D, 4D do not exist

[@edweber6136]

I could listen to Ms. Randall talk all day!!

[@ddjhackers]

I immediately understood her way of explaining the theory, like fluid water in a calm river.. This matter really came from her heart and mind.. Maybe the next extra dimensions are out of reach, because to understand them fully we need to be higher dimension beings like angels or something..

[@marianneschumacher2939]

Angels are not part of the natural, but are supernatural.

[@eugene7518]

Flatlanders don't exist. Big problem.

[@eugene7518]

In flatland shapes can not be seen. Only imaginary lines can be seen. To see a shape one must stand over it. That is possible only in 3D. So Carl Sagan is wrong.

[@keeislegend]

@@eugene7518 maybe we just perceive them in the 3rd dimension. They prolly there

[@CemTurC]

Could you please indicate the record dates in your uploads.

[@nibblrrr7124]

I was wondering the same thing.

[@reenatai75]

Yes this interview is abit old

[@LordOfNothingham]

June 6 1944

[@onetruekeeper]

According to some physicists we live on a 2 dimensional surface of a black hole. The 3rd dimension is an illusion similar to how a 2 dimensional drawing done in perspective gives a sense of depth.

[@captainzappbrannagan]

This is not true for a flat space reality, only curved. We live in a flat space.

[@onetruekeeper]

@@captainzappbrannagan The black hole is a singularity, a one dimension point and has no surface, flat or curved but a two dimensional "surface" could still be expressed in pure mathematical terms using angles radiating from a central point. In a perspective drawing there is usually a vanishing point on the horizon line.

[@seen203]

@@captainzappbrannagan Except it might actually not be www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/news/the-universe-isnt-flat--its-curved/

[@AsttoScott]

I actually think time is proof that we live in a controlled reality regardless of what ever that might mean or be. Basically according to Einstein's *proven* theory gravity causes time dialation, the more there is the greater the dialation. Everything from the centre of the milkway to our Sun and finally down to our planet slows time down more and more for us. So what that means is if some one is at the centre of the Galaxy, (I am guessing the math here, i just wanted to provide an example) they will experience 1 minute of time while we all experience 100 years. Why does our reality have these rules set in place? Unless of course some one looking from the outside in wants their simulations to end faster.

[@eugene7518]

1D, 2D, 4D do not exist

[@nickbeef4824]

I don’t understand a word she said but she is luxurious.

[@JimElford]

We were born in a room, and we're trying to picture the outside of the building. The foundations. It's structure and density. All from within the room.

[@elskid206]

RIGHT!!!!! I like the embryo analogy. Imagine what the embryo must be “thinking”. S/he is “aware” of SOME things, but is 100% ignorant about what is going on a few inches away and what is ABOUT to happen. Oh yeah. What a moment THAT must be for the embryo when the mom’s water breaks and nature starts turning this little one around for its journey across its known “universe” and then OUT of it entirely (through a canal FAR to narrow)!!! It would have to be like us seeing a GIANT slit opening in the sky. The ENTIRE purpose is for embryo grow for a period of time being prepped to enter this unknown world beyond what we knew. THAT IS US…we have been living for a period of time (AKA: human history) being prepped to enter an unknown world, which is WAITING for us with nothing but love.

[@matthewyabsley]

@@elskid206 - But if we take that womb analogy, then it is easy to say ignorance is bliss. LOL.

[@dananorth895]

Actually that's an imperfect analogy. It ignores the differences between dimensions.

[@matthewyabsley]

Mate, if i was born and lived in a room you can be sure I'll be trying to work out what the outside of the room is made of. You'd get bored with one room after a while :-p

[@10thdim]

In April 1919 Kaluza noticed that when he solved Albert Einstein's equations for general relativity using five dimensions then Maxwellian equations for electromagnetism emerged spontaneously. I believe this is the same Fifth Dimension that Nobel laureate Kip Thorne shows us, as the place where simultaneous probabilistic 4D spacetimes can be viewed simultaneously, this idea portrayed brilliantly in Nolan's Interstellar, for which Thorne was science advisor.

[@Jamie-Russell-CME]

amazing! Can you offer me a resource to learn and understand this?

[@10thdim]

@@Jamie-Russell-CME Definitely Thorne's book The Science of Interstellar is worth reading. He insists that it's fine to lump all the remaining dimensions together and call them The Bulk: I think of it as the parts of Tegmark's Ultimate Ensemble that are not directly connected to our currently observed reality.

[@Itoldajokeonce]

I love your 10th dimension videos; have you considered revisiting that material, or do you feel those ideas have been taken as far as they can?

[@10thdim]

Mega Dan Definitely this is what my latest videos and new book are all about, exploring this exciting playground of ideas surrounding extra dimensions.

[@gknight4719]

Hi 10thdim, can you have a two dimensional object ? Surly it would have to be at minimum one atom think ,to be able to exist . Any thoughts cheers

[@peterpanino2436]

Extra dimensions don't need to be like space or time. They can be something totally different. My preferred candidate for an extra dimension is CONSCIOUSNESS. This dimension would help to solve a lot of problems in quantum physics like the particle-wave dualism or Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

[@comphysync9084]

CONSCIOUSNESS is more the projector of dimensions and the mean to experience and expand them

[@oldbatwit5102]

Do you guys just type letters at random just hoping to make sense? You both failed, BTW.

[@comphysync9084]

@@oldbatwit5102 teach us master

[@koenarmstrong1376]

Oldbatwit I mean it’s freedom of speech and they’re just ideas and concepts but I believe as well that consciousness plays a role in the extra dimensions theory. Look at all the crazy things the mind can do include just being a mind. It can remote view, make predications in your dreams, and not to mention the savants and geniuses like the guy who invented the periodic table IN HIS SLEEP (travelling other dimensions with his consciousness) Old bat wit... you failed miserably

[@oldbatwit5102]

@@koenarmstrong1376 Do me a favour and read aloud the utter fucking bollocks you just posted. Then say, honestly, which of us is failing miserably.

[@aryanpandey8262]

I read her book ' knocking on the heavens door' it's just amazing and bizzare ⌚

[@SpotterVideo]

Eph 3:18 May be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height;

[@eugene7518]

Flatlanders have only a side view. They can't notice where length and width meet. Therefore everything appears as an imaginary line. Cause they can't stand over a shape, to see the shape. That's only possible in 3D.

[@periurban]

That Princess Diana has really brushed up on her string theory.

[@wruff378]

Robert: "Lisa, are there extra dimensions?" Lisa: "F if I know"

[@adamw7290]

LOL Good one. :) That pretty well sums it up.

[@debshreebasu8137]

@@adamw7290 yeahhh lol hahahaha

[@edwardd.484]

Could it be that we just dont have the sensing mechanisms to detect extra dimensions... like electromagnetism/consciousness

[@acool6401]

I tend to agree. We humans just naturally assume that all that can be determined is within the spectrum of our five senses or derived thereof in some way. The reality is more likely than not that we only evolved with what Mother Nature deemed was necessary to survive most effectively in this particular nature. For example if you visited a visually oriented environment or planet where others were identical to you except for the sense of sound. In fact, no one even knew what sound was and then they blinded folded you and asked you determine when it was raining or thundering or when persons were clapping or walking by you. Your accuracy in determining these simple things would astound them as if you were some magical being and yet we take the sense of hearing for granted and think nothing of it. Similarly there are things that others could do that would astound us because they experiencing their reality with more than just the 5 senses and humans arrogantly assume that those senses are the only interfaces with our reality.

[@snukkelpuppie]

I can see her working with Data and LaForge testing new warp field mechanics 😉

[@makedredd299]

That’s logical. 🖖

[@ogdocvato]

snukkelpuppie Maybe even Lt. Reg Barkley too!

[@geoden]

Keep it real please guys.

[@stevencoardvenice]

@@ogdocvato She wouldnt tolerate Reg. He's a perv

[@liftcarryfetish1296]

@@stevencoardvenice what are you folks talking about? Some TV show reference?

[@daffidavit]

The latest paper on "Dark Energy" recently published last Oct. 2019 challenges the Nobel prize winning study by Perlmutter, Reis and Schmidt. It challenges the way the fundamental data used by the lastest numbers of Type 1a supernovae were not examined properly by the 1997 paper. The latest paper challenges the concept of "dark energy" and concludes the universe is not accelerating, but is yet expanding at a constant rate. In other words, Einstein's cosmological constant has not yet been properly tweaked. See the latest YT video by Sabine Hossenfelder Ph.D.

[@chadebrownnyc]

Link please

[@daffidavit]

@@chadebrownnyc kzbin.info/www/bejne/paLKfIuHgp15prc

[@gregallen1]

Occam’s razor simply explains it best. The truth or the answer is simple and non complex but because science has chosen to ignore the obvious answer to the ultimate question, physicist can’t seem to be on the same page. You see, if I asked you to explain how a computer is designed, built, functions and supplied with information without ever giving me the obvious answer such as an intelligent source (man) designed it that way then you would have to come up with all kinds of complex theory’s that would change every 30-40 years etc.

[@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace]

If Dr. Subir and crew are right then my work is kind of right, as I have seen the 7 levels in wave length are all over in the universe at ANY DIMENTION(size of level).

[@eugene7518]

In flatland shapes can not be seen. Only imaginary lines can be seen. To see a shape one must stand over it. That is possible only in 3D. So Carl Sagan is wrong.

[@tommytinsleyjr.6657]

Very knowledgeable in her field. THANKS for the input

[@partiallyhydrogenatedsaffl1366]

Braneworlds, dimensional rotations and torsion, quantum field theory, strings and branes, all that. Freakin awesome

[@STohme]

Very interesting video as it is usual with Lisa. Many thanks.

[@eugene7518]

1D, 2D, 4D do not exist

[@leha1908]

Of course there are extra dimensions, have you not seen the average American citizen. They have all the extra dimensions, some even have their own gravity.

[@sterlingfury7970]

😆 lol ...that is funny and true and sad 😥

[@cflo1386]

With their own moons, gravity, and black holes.

[@alcaraz1963]

True 😂

[@mangoryder7139]

Not in California

[@readingRoom100]

@@mangoryder7139 and which california are u referring to

[@anilsezgin490]

Lisa Randall looks a lot like Jodie Foster and reminds me of the movie Contact every time I see her.

[@rostamr4096]

I know...

[@chancemcgyver7537]

Parallel universes

[@coolpoolshark]

I was searching for that connection too, in spite of the difference of their voices and heights. The way she talks reminds me of Elon Musk.

[@rostamr4096]

@@chancemcgyver7537 "This is indeed a disturbing universe"

[@turbosport]

Both studied at Harvard right... Intelligent women are so attractive...

[@aarthoor]

Her book on Dinosaurs and Dark Matter is excellent. So much to learn and very clearly written.

[@eugene7518]

In flatland shapes can not be seen. Only imaginary lines can be seen. To see a shape one must stand over it. That is possible only in 3D. So Carl Sagan is wrong.

[@ralphsammis7330]

Existential Dimensions. After 4th( spacetime), I used to explain 5th, a time exposure photo (as a chunk of time). New = (also 5th) a past experience stored away w/ details & emotions. A dimension. It can be revisited in your memory.

[@keeislegend]

This dudes astral projected before

[@Masonicon]

"Time as 4th dimension" are misconception about 4th dimension And in "matter move faster than light" are one of impossible things that made possible by physics of 4th dimension 4-dimensional physics only bend and change laws of conservation of mass and energy, not outright breaking it. It usually take 5-dimensional physics to outright break the law of consetvation of mass and energy

[@eugene7518]

1D, 2D, 4D do not exist

[@eugene7518]

In flatland shapes can not be seen. Only imaginary lines can be seen. To see a shape one must stand over it. That is possible only in 3D. So Carl Sagan is wrong.

[@FAK_CHEKR]

Serious question: are there even three dimensions? I question their existence for this reason: there is no such thing as a two dimensional surface or object. A two dimensional surface is only a concept. If you take an object and squeeze one of its dimensions down to zero, the object disappears. It cannot be zero in any direction otherwise it does not physically exist. That is a strange property for our three dimensions to have, that if you remove any one of them the other two disappear. So do they exist as three dimensions, or is there only one dimension which we separate into three because it makes our math work?

[@squeakeththewheel]

That is the right question and your point well taken. A better way the understand the 2D world of Flatland is that it doesn't have zero thickness, as you said; rather it is very thin. Think of some kind of ameba shaped like a very thin disk that lives in a very thin puddle of water, so thin the ameba can't turn its head and look up or down, it can only see and move left, right, forward, back. So our 3D world could be like that - a very thin 3D slab embedded in a 4D large world.

[@eugene7518]

1D, 2D, 4D do not exist

[@garypowell4565]

The 5th Dimension was a great band in the 60's

[@johnchase4408]

Age of Aquarius

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

quantum wave function in time dimension outside or beneath Planck units? generate faster than light speeds in beneath Planck time dimension, up to speed of light squared?

[@rep10101]

This is very thought provoking

[@banpowel9784]

Well, most of the universe is invisable, or is it simply, thar our eyes are not capable of seeing everything.

[@michaeldeierhoi4096]

Just look at the electromagnetic spectrum. The visible light that we can see is only the narrow band in the middle, while it actually stretches out from both ends much further. Google the image for perspective.

[@AsttoScott]

Why would we need to adapt to see something that has never had any effect on our ancestors lives?

[@Jmatad21]

Oh really 😜😜

[@AsttoScott]

@Wednesdayfornight Sorry, i shouldve elaborated. With out being exposed to extremes adaptations will not occur. We don't need to be able to see UV light to survive so our bodies won't adapt to be able to see it.

[@AsttoScott]

@Wednesdayfornight You missed the point again. We cannot see UV light because we never needed too. Just like other spectrums that we cannot see and we never will be able too with out help. Hopefully you understand this time.

[@grock5209]

I'm having trouble in this dimensions 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

[@cidsapient7154]

we dont actually see in 3 dimensions we utilize our brains to perceive 3 dimensions if this is possible there shouldnt be any reason we know about that would stop us from being able to peer into higher dimensions even if we are never able to see higher dimensions with our eyes alone we will develop tools to be able to view them just the same as we cannot see radio waves but are able to create tools that can, as well as visualize them for us

[@cidsapient7154]

@@GCKelloch use those comprehension skills ;)

[@theinstantnoodle9628]

Mind blown.

[@AsttoScott]

I don't think you understand how it works. You will be able to see something, it will just be the way your senses interpret it.

[@scottmiller4295]

they do in math already, string maths work in 14 16 or so dimensions to account for fields and loops of gravity and strings do not work in under 5 dimensions dimension 4 is generally time. but less than 5 strings cant loop, and fields cant ignore matter. there are for certain higher dimensions we cant interact with but through math and measurement.

[@cidsapient7154]

@@GCKelloch ok then pay me a salary to hire and underwriter for youtube comments... dont like it? move on sally underwriter is not the right word, cant think of the name of that job atm

[@mark.J6708]

Seems like there are 6 dimensions that we can discover with a 7th we cannot yet know must be there. One could also argue that some may be small while others are not. Gravity would certainly be different in each depending on a number of things. Cern finding anything or not may just mean we are not looking or thinking the right way. Should we ask what can and what are the possible affects of moving between dimensions or living through more than 3. We know we can live and move about in three, is there another way to interact with another dimension that allows for different views into our 3? She's outstanding.

[@rusdayatiidrus5401]

A great talk on a great topic. Both r highly sophisticated n we r intrigued n interested for more. More n more up to the end of our limited mind horizon.

[@ivangomezguitar9518]

I love how she talks. So intelligent

[@cretan7726]

Maybe you would get impressed by Elizabeth Thanos too

[@tajzikria5307]

She's okay.

[@eugene7518]

1D, 2D, 4D do not exist.

[@marcv2648]

The Mathematician's Conceit, "Even if these ideas about extra dimensions turn out not to be right, they've given rise to new ideas about 3 dimensions." That's some powerful coping.

[@BassGoBomb]

'We learn more by our mistakes' .. I think, is an old saying. Socrates said, "The wise man knows he knows nothing." There is a source that professes to be all knowing ... haha .. imagine THAT ... unlikely as it may be. Risible in the extreme.

[@raymondjacinto4880]

I believe there is a parallel universes I saw two object triangle shape in Lake Chapala Mexico 2013, I ask people nobody knew anything or wouldn't say only a doctor said { Parallel Universes }.

[@Sapientiaa]

@@raymondjacinto4880 If by parallel you mean other higher dimensional parts of reality that we cannot see, and may also be stacked upon what we call the universe then YES; but if you’re referring to a multiverse like in DC, or marvel then the answer is most likely NO. There could be sentient life in these other higher dimensions; entities that are beyond our comprehension.

[@raymondjacinto4880]

@@Sapientiaa I saw a 2 triangle object wasn't any kid marvel; yes this has change my life I came out of the darkness exlgnorantiaAdSapientiam.

[@chrisbillings338]

@@raymondjacinto4880 where did you see this object?

[@zombiehordes4517]

I had to pause the video after 8 seconds and concluded that 1) I have no clue what's going on 2) she is soooooo beautiful

[@garyconrod9859]

I also don't know what a Pink Moon is but there could be a dimension like reason that people play the guitar the same even years later because the guitar is still the same, so really string theory would have to be the same way because they're strings that make noises at frequencies causing different kinds of sound waves, the earth is made of acoustical resonance of sound and the human brain is at the same frequency as the earth.

[@andyiswonderful]

One thing that I don't understand about the description of the extra dimensions being very small and curled up. Why does that matter? Regardless of the size and shape and complexity of these "extra" dimensions, their geometry can still be described using 3D Cartesian coordinates. Are these extra dimensions somehow outside of our 3D Cartesian world?

[@robertsimon6674]

first impression : genius Lisa Randall ... second : beautiful

[@jessemanson3722]

Robert Simon third : Jody Foster fourth : basic instinct

[@benwilliams3539]

the 2D creatures couldnt see the whole sphere sure, but the bottom of a sphere could still come down and crush them living on their 2D plane

[@peaceonearth351]

I don't think it works that way. The 4D world is oblivious to us as a 3D world would be to 2D.

[@stanislavdaganov574]

​@@peaceonearth351 Only that there is no 4D and there is no 2D. There is 3D plus Time spacetime. No one is living inside a 2D sheet of paper. 2D cartoons are imaginary. Now, if we count an alternate reality as a 4D, then indeed we are completely oblivious for it: if we were not, we would know about a different set of events into it, where we would have a clone. As it won't be just one, the human mind would not be able to even imagine it, let alone accept and properly understand. However, they are not searching for this: it is a science fiction topic. They are crashing protons, to find... essentially nothing. Like little children in the kindergarten, with a university degree, playing with pebbles.

[@RO8s]

No, no, not at all - it would start as a singularity - a point, and then would expand into a circle, pushing them out of the way.

[@nikolaos9175]

Lisa Randall is beautiful

[@bmayaa]

she would be more beautiful if she were a perfect sphere

[@akaROOSTA]

❤

[@vivekmaurya8549]

😂😂😂🎮

[@joeremus9039]

And she explains physics in a beautiful way.

[@iwasbehindyou]

Everyone is you Time only goes One way 🗝

[@zyxmyk]

it amuses me when they say unseen dimensions are "tiny." it reminds me of when I told my two year old the pyramids we'd seen on TV were in Egypt. She kept saying, "Where is Egypt--is it over there? Is it behind that building?" they try to explain things beyond our imaginings in ways that we can imagine. if those are real, we'll have to have a breakthrough. we may never understand it.

[@MrAlanfalk73]

The movie "Flatland" can be found here on KZbin if anyone is interested. It is also a great reference to both Platos "cave" allogi and to dictatorship.

[@MonetaryRebel]

Thank you! I'll check it out.

[@vamsikrishna5261]

There are extra dimensions...life is only possible in 3 dimensions

[@eugene7518]

1D 2D 4D do not exist

[@nigeltooby7681]

I've often wondered... If you can contain a 3D image in a 2D hologram. Could you contain a 4D image in a 3D hologram?

[@johnshilling2221]

Yes, but it takes time. Ba-dum-bum..🤪🥁

[@michaeljones7465]

Yes, but it takes light, a functional dimension.

[@angellittleton8901]

Everything makes sense if we're living in a game simulation. All these mysteries aren't mysteries at all you're just slowly uncovering the programming that runs everything.

[@colinr2550]

It can't be using the unreal engine. If it were the texture lag would be visible.

[@elih9700]

@@colinr2550 It's the Crysis engine, the comments section lags.

[@AsttoScott]

Yeah, we uncover it. Warning lights flash on the AI's dash board. They delete us... I honestly think we need to roll with Ignorance is bliss on this specific topic quite literally for just in case it is true because it wont end well for us.

[@daniluchison]

NEO: What truth? MORPHEUS: That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else, you were born into bondage. Born into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch. A PRISON FOR YOUR MIND” The Matrix Movie “The Shamans of ancient Mexico, thousands of years ago when leaving their physical at will, discovered something TRANSCENDENTAL for our species. -What did they discover Don Juan? They confirmed that have a predator that came from the DEPTHS OF THE COSMOS and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its [energetic] prisoners. The predator is our lord and master. It has rendered us docile, helpless. If we want to protest, it suppresses our protest. Shamans believe that the predators have given us our systems of beliefs, our ideas of good and evil, our social mores. They are the ones who set up our hopes and expectations and dreams of success or failure. They have given us covetousness, greed and cowardice. It is the predators who make us complacent, routinary and egomaniacal. They gave us their mind you hear me? As soon as we are born, it slowly becomes ‘our mind’... Through the mind, which after all is THEIR mind, the predators INJECT into the lives of human beings whatever is convenient for them.” Book: Active Side of Infinity, chapter Mud Shadows. www.federaljack.com/ebooks/Castenada/sites/rarecloud.com/cc_html/cc_html_12/tasoi18.html

[@patdexter9188]

Wow, after listening to this I'm going to get her book because I know nothing about any extra dimensions! But after seeing a few weird things over my life that could explain alot!

[@tashuntka]

Brilliant explaining....A highly informative video. Thank you. 👍🙏👍

[@patrandolph4209]

Thank you To my friend Jim Davis. In the early 90's we worked at IBM together and he introduced me to Flatland. My More recent considerations on the Subject pertain to "Prime Numbers" for Existances to coexist And interfold. This All "within" an overall (separate yet concurrent) (so called) "First Cause" resultant. So... the Dimensional Numbers within "Coexistances," would be based on Prime number values. This would Allow ALL to Function individually, Absent of what might be thought of by us as: interference(s), overlap(s), or collision(s).

[@largerooster2059]

All I can say is Lisa is the most beautiful woman in my dimension! Luv you girl!!!!!!

[@largerooster2059]

Why are so many women lost when it comes to reality ? This beautiful woman is a godsend !

[@choaticblack]

Id hit

[@hinteregions]

Idiots, just idiots.

[@catherinemira75]

Chalmers is handsome: but that's not something I'd want to comment on after listening to him. Why do you ( and men generally ) are so sexists?

[@catherinemira75]

@@largerooster2059 in my experience, it is men who are disconnected from reality..

[@shigraf6500]

God bless these scientists to work more to solve mysterious universes.

[@planje4740]

Oh Space exist not For Space is needed Evolution Whom you have not

[@smartentertainment9574]

Ameen

[@ddmagee57]

Not for purchase, but they can be leased.

[@ralphsammis7330]

Interesting ideas. Existential me: we know my extra dimensions but cannot experience. 4=spacetime; 5=a chunk (?10 min) past or present(past being diff dimension then present) all at once (we can have emotions of a given timed experience & put it in the category of one thing)- Why reach for other dimensions beyond human understanding capabilities?

[@ralphsammis7330]

Existential Dimensions. After 4th( spacetime), I used to explain 5th, a time exposure photo (as a chunk of time). New = (also 5th) a past experience stored away w/ details & emotions. A dimension. It can be revisited in your memory.

[@kalgz6110]

I’m in love- what a great and smart lady. Much admiration

[@KeltoiMagus]

I was just thinking t j e same thing. She explains so clearly.

[@ermiasd2695]

You gonna have to fight me first. I, too, have fallen for her

[@wcottee]

I'm in the mix for her affections :) (but my wife would have a problem with it :( )

[@ermiasd2695]

@@wcottee show her a clip… she will totally give you a pass. Wait; why am I helping you?

[@atarax232323]

😧😐

[@huuud]

Beautiful and smart👍

[@juliecollins6396]

Other dimensions developed individually in childhood, e.g. starting 2 yr. old to see people gliding in & out of windows & doors but when pointed out to family members & childhood friends but they didn't see what one is seeing, then eventually didn't see anymore because the people around didn't see them. ⭐️

[@ijamsum]

Yes you had a gift of spirit and many abilities do our spirit have such as we call physic healing which is our spirit ability ! You are indeed gifted ! It would be interesting to know about your past lifetimes !

[@LuisBlancoAustin]

Dr. Randall is such a smart and eloquent person.

[@mickeybowmeister1944]

Interstellar did this so well, communicating between the 3rd and 4th dimension through power of love.

[@adrianm.8278]

I’m in love 🥰

[@scottlouissmith2382]

I think he's a straight man!😆

[@jorgeatacav835]

Am I the only one who fell in love? 😖

[@jackjones3657]

No doubt, she's a very good looking woman. She's needs more sleep though.

[@jorgeatacav835]

Jack Jones probably! But, every time she says: “quantum mechanics”, i forget about those issues lol

[@dougraddi908]

I fell in love with her brain a long time ago, ages it seems

[@theodoresweger4948]

Read the book it was a good read not too complicated.

[@ArtofLunatik]

she has a very relaxing voice.

[@zucicciu58]

Just wondering why her name isn't preceded by "dr.' or followed by "PhD" - She's earned it and deserves to be recognized

[@zucicciu58]

@hold this Yes, she holds a Doctorate

[@speedybarney]

To be honest, I'm just happy with 3 dimensions

[@clockworkdave9850]

Agreed.. haha

[@Jmatad21]

So you dont want to live?. Cos living happens cos of fourth dimension. that is time

[@speedybarney]

@@Jmatad21 , well 4 then Mr Pedantic

[@johnbiggins4864]

There may be entities we dont wish to find ie.djinns spirits god....your mother in law

[@turkeyrunfarms]

Erich Addler it’s a construct. A man made idea to help understand and organize the three dimensions. Also, I really wish she would work on her diction, it’s so tight , it’s almost painful.

[@beaconterraoneonline]

Why do many of these Closer to Truth videos have a ridiculous amount of annoying background noises going on?

[@suncat9]

Lisa Randall likes to wear beads that click together as she's talking and making hand gestures.

[@everready2903]

Those noises are coming from the fourth dimension.

[@Eyes-of-Horus]

Those background noises are the inane comments in the comment section.

[@michaeldeierhoi4096]

@J A. There is another possibility that those sounds you attribute to the video are in your own head.

[@RodanX21]

Anything's possible, .. the only limitation is the firmware.

[@mickleigh674]

You mean the Firmament?

[@Sapientiaa]

Didn’t the quantum Hall effect already prove of the existence of a fourth spatial dimension?

[@singletron3722]

I feel like gravity should be viewed as a dimensional world that contains a defined order over space, and the various gravity fields connect their complex systems into each other infinitely. I guess this supports the relativity theory, but i’m suggesting we consider the perspective of Gravity not as a force but instead as containment fields of overlapping/interconnecting cosmic orders. Measuring the relative force through this perspective can help us visualize the boundaries of these complex systems and learn more about how they connect with each other similar to how elements form pairing through their electrical charges... clearly I’m not an expert on the topic but this perspective fascinated me. Especially now when super computers are identifying these extra dimensions in space/time and suggesting ways for us to harvest interesting resources from them.

[@vanmonroe4346]

Can someone please tell the janitor to come back after the interview? Jeez

[@zombiehordes4517]

It's ok they just wanted to listen so after work they can go back home and solve all these questions. Lol.

[@forktaildevil38j44]

She's like a genius Jodi Foster. Wow!

[@joytaylor3964]

Forktaildevil38J isn't this the lady that Jodi Fosters character in the movie contact was based on?

[@forktaildevil38j44]

Dont know. I thought Starling was totally fictional. Is she FBI trained as well?!

[@forktaildevil38j44]

Oh, you said Contact. I haven't seen it.

[@graydonmiller731]

The novel was written when Randall was 23.

[@bar10ml44]

She has such a stunning voice and good looking too

[@timsimpson9367]

What is on the other side of a black hole ? and when ? Plus what happens to the matter that goes through it ? as we can't see it.

[@dennistucker1153]

Are there Extra Dimensions? Depends on how you define "Dimensions". To me, I believe we are multi-dimensional creatures living in a multi-dimensional universe. Thank you CTT. . I have a theory related to this. I think our universe is built on 4 super-dimensions(Nothingness, space, time, energy). Space, time and energy seem to have at least 3 dimensions each. Space has length, width and height. Time has past, present and future. Energy has work, storage and conversion. As for other dimensions, my thoughts are a bit simple. If we had a specialty group like lawyers is a room. They are all specialized in the same branch of law. Then in that room at that time, it is a dimension of law in that specialty. The same thing is true inside all specialties(work, sports, social, etc.).

[@certainly2509]

So lawyers are nothing?😂