Nima Arkani-Hamed - Why is Quantum Gravity So Significant?

[@zyp85]

Exactly when was this filmed? Nima is almost 50 now but here he looks like he's barely 30. It'd be a good idea to put a timestamp on your videos.

[@dawid_dahl]

He just said time doesn’t operationally exist.

[@sxbmissive]

Actual response: I agree; I don’t think he looks like this anymore, from the more recent pictures or videos I’ve seen. I think CTT uploads highlights of older episodes and interviews sometimes…which is fine, but I agree, they should put it in the description when these interviews took place, just for context. Alternate comedy response: Nima has so much knowledge of space-time, he figured out time travel and constantly replaces himself with a younger version.

[@exceptionaldifference392]

Indeed. I love this channel and have learnt a lot through it, but the omission of date of interview is tantamount to active deception and not really closer to truth. Several videos are several decades old, this shouldn't be hidden from the viewer, they are historical records.

[@manulscode]

He invented a time machine and traveled to the future as a 30-year old.

[@waldwassermann]

Time is relative so he is relatively speaking ♩ ♪ ♫ for the first time in forever ♬ ♭ ♮ ♯ 🎼 🎵 🎶

[@Bored14690]

Explanation at 3:30 sounds very nice. Didn’t think that inconsistency of GR with Quantum can be explained without any math.

[@RWin-fp5jn]

Except...this is precisely where Nima is making the same Einsteinian error as everyone else for 100 years. Why do energy and space have an inverse relation? Because they are inversely equivalent. As are mass and time. (Penrose always argues this by substituting E=hv into E=MC2). So again; energy is equivalent to inverse space and mass to inverse time. E=MC2 is mathematically correct but it is NOT an equivalence relation anymore then distance=time*speed is an 'equivalence relation' between space and time. You cannot just take two terms left nd right form an = sign and declare them 'equivalent'. Einsteins greatest blunder. So indeed to venture the smalls distances you have to put the most energy onto particles. This means [J/kg] the energy density is getting to large and will collapse just as what happens when you exceed C (m/s). remember; J/kg is equivalent to the inverse of m/s. So basically you will invers the grid structure in a mini blackhole where energy is now the grid and mass the clock. It is that simple

[@docdaytona108]

When they make the Nima Arkani-Hames biopic, on voice timbre and cadence alone, Adam Driver gets the lead role.

[@kendebusk2540]

Incredibly interesting! I finally know why the Planck length is so important! Just as the old fable said "It's turtles all the way down," I know see what he said means "It's all black holes all the way down."

[@umeriftikhar6151]

Very well described

[@caezium.133]

Superb explanation!

[@spc9078]

Awesome interview thnx

[@thedudegrowsfood284]

This is deep.

[@dylnjshua4256]

You’re deeper.

[@Bluemax54]

God is even deeper, too deep for us.

[@dylnjshua4256]

@@Bluemax54 Yup

[@surendrakverma555]

Very good 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@arik3974]

Can someone explain, or point me in the right direction on how to understand why more energy is needed for probing smaller distances?

[@tmcche7881]

I took it to mean, Because the distances are so small quantum theory applies. Using Planck’s Quantum Theory: Since, the smallest distance of measure possible is proportional to the wavelength and the wavelength is in the denominator, the smaller the denominator the greater the energy required. E=hv, using Planck’s Quantum Theory E = Energy v = frequency (= c/lambda) lambda = wavelength h = Planck's constant c = speed of light ps, warning, I am just an old retired Chemical engineer that took modern physics in the 1970s, check to be certain. Click me if I am far off.

[@kaellum4260]

Shrink theory in my personal library is referred to as Concept 19. #3767

[@azur7362]

Never expected Harrison Wells and Cisco Ramon to talk about this outside the tv-show.

[@dongshengdi773]

3:20 Black hole , Big Bang , "If you would just, in this room, just twist time and space the right way, you might create an entirely new universe. It's not clear you could get into that universe, but you would create it." "So it could be that this universe is merely the science fair project of a kid in another universe," Shostak added. "I don't know how that affects your theological leanings, but it is something to consider." Filippenko stressed that such statements are not attacks on the existence of God. Saying the Big Bang - a massive expansion 13.7 billion years ago that blew space up like a gigantic balloon - could have occurred without God is a far cry from saying that God doesn't exist, he said. "I don't think you can use science to either prove or disprove the existence of God," Filippenko said. 'Why are there laws of physics?'" he said. "And you could say, 'Well, that required a divine creator, who created these laws of physics and the spark that led from the laws of physics to these universes, maybe more than one.'" But that answer just continues to kick the can down the road, because you still need to explain where the divine creator came from. The process leads to a never-ending chain that always leaves you short of the ultimate answer, Filippenko said. The origin of the laws of physics remains a mystery for now, he added, one that we may never be able to solve. "The 'divine spark' was whatever produced the laws of physics," Filippenko said. "And I don't know what produced that divine spark. So let's just leave it at the laws of physics."

[@binkz5987]

Act of measurement / observation...that which u seek you affect / reflect..

[@vu4y3fo846y]

Keep up the good work 🙂

[@markpmar0356]

It seems that the only place the elusive "graviton" could exist, if it does, is in the center of mass of a black hole. Which is to say, it's comprised of unobtainium.

[@OBGynKenobi]

What I don't get is when they say quantum gravity, do they really mean the same planetary attractive force? Are they saying that an electron should behave like a planet and attract things just based on its mass?

[@das_it_mane]

In Nima's case, he's talking it about within the context of string theory. So gravitons as the force carrier of the gravitational force. It's still unproven and there are other quantum gravity (...let's call it what they all really are) hypotheses.

[@ninemonthfall]

I think he's saying that gravity emerges out of more fundamental forces that we haven't been able to figure out yet. Like the workings of an unknown much smaller force accumulates and manifests into gravity on the larger macro and cosmological scale.

[@NikkiTrudelle]

I feel like quantum optomechanics in liquid helium, as well as super computers will lead to the next breakthrough for our civilization that will change this reality into something we never thought possible

[@IIrandhandleII]

And so the rabbit hole goes ever deeper

[@amaliaantonopoulou2644]

I knew that in particle accelerators, small black holes can be created after using a very high amount of energy, but I didn't know that it probably means that there is nothing below that level! does anyone know if that state is below the state of the vacuum? Thanks for posting this video.

[@russhamilton3800]

I hear people say this, yet we have never seen one afaik.

[@DoveSimon]

If these forces appear to be very similar as we approach the planck length, but noticeably different as distance increases and the forces "emerge", what does that tell us? Are we wasting our "time" trying to measure static things instead of understanding and measuring emergence itself? Hopefully this is not a stupid question.

[@projectmalus]

The difficulty with emergence is recreating it so as to observe and prove. Little clues are there already and Sapolsky's lectures 21 and 22 on Stanford channel get into a) why reductionism doesn't work (can't know the start state from end state and vice versa) and b) how emergence is all about basic elements that are intrinsically well adapted and when faced with some sort of pressure will drop back down into these basic elements. Emergence seems fairly well understood on the visible biological level because it's already there to observe but how to recreate on a fundamental level?

[@sillymesilly]

That is a great question.

[@dabonemarrow5337]

Again you guys Astound me!! 😊 Thanks

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

When black hole created by energies used to measure at planck time and space, could this mean that space and time are changing places at the plank units like inside black hole? How exactly would space and time change places? Maybe space and time changing places inside black hole, smaller than planck units, and perhaps outside universe is the usual condition of space and time; and the space-time inside universe is unusual?

[@gregoryhead382]

The shortest distance between gravity and light to occur may be as concise as g=(meter)c^2 to get closer to the truth.

[@misha-jz4yx]

i have a question

[@lemongavine]

Could it be that quantum gravity is caused by the spinning of particles? It seems that spinning particles would cause an attractive force. Maybe the sum of all of those spinning particles causes regular gravity too? The more spinning particles means more mass, and more mass means stronger gravitational attraction.

[@das_it_mane]

They're not actually balls spinning though, they're waves. And mass is condensed energy.

[@SpotterVideo]

Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons. Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.

[@matishakabdullah5874]

David Thomson and Jim Bourassa aether physics model connect quantum dynamic and gravity through aether! Physics in need of new approach. Standard model has reached it dead end!

[@B.S...]

Is spacetime discrete or continuous? Quantum mechanics vs Relativity.

[@sillymesilly]

As far as we know discrete.

[@imrematajz1624]

Actually, it is both. It is called duality.

[@blengi]

regarding @ 1:12 "...if we want to probe what was going on at very short distances we had to use very high energies...a thousand time smaller than a proton we have to beg taxpayers..." - how much energy is LIGO using when detecting displacements in space time of the order of .0001 of a proton, or is that not probing what's going on at short distances?

[@MrJPI]

Don't try to look what is at extremly small volume of space, so you wont create a black hole. :-) That is: Does Nima's reasoning show that spacetime breaks at about Planck scale? Or is it just that we cannot probe those scales?

[@mikel4879]

Juha I / No. It is just simple human mind's impotence. Nothing breaks down. Everything can be understood if the human mind gets out of the traps created by dogmas of any kind ( "scientifical", theoretical, ontological, etc ).

[@mavrosyvannah]

Now this kid made me feel good. I would allow him into my school of the greatest philosophy ever invented by man, mine

[@devanairemccallister4194]

He used to be fat with really bad teeth. Now he looks exceptional

[@ChuckBrowntheClown]

What it seems like it tends to show and prove to me is that eternity always has been and always will be. Cuz some things eternal you can't make it smaller than the smallest it can go unless it becomes void and without form like what a black hole is.

[@ThomasJr]

4:08 you can see his eyes gleam after he makes a correct statement abou energy and mass equivalence, although not fully accurate.

[@mazelme]

"I'm gonna go get the papers, get the papers."

[@barbossa70]

tommy 2 times

[@ViralKiller]

Jimmy 2 times

[@esharcismail5793]

Beautiful.

[@thereligionofrationality8257]

This young man's explanation of why it is impossible to measure things beneath the Planck scale was beautiful. One of the best generalisations I have ever heard. And then he suddenly transitioned into giving credence to String Theory! Jesus Effing Christo...when are we going to stop filling beautiful minds up with BS!

[@joshkeeling82]

String theory is junk and untestable. Hopefully soon a better theory will emerge that will free us from the constraints of string theory, since string theory is untestable and thus will take us no further in understanding this wonderful thing we call reality. Other than that, your comment is spot on. Except that he's no longer a young man.. this video was filmed at least 25 years ago, I remember watching it on PBS in the mid 90's.

[@thereligionofrationality8257]

@@joshkeeling82 Perhaps you misunderstood my point. I'm well aware that String Theory is junk science. I meant to convey the idea that we waste valuable resources teaching this pseudoscientific BS to up and coming physicists. Thanks for pointing out that this is old stuff; didn't know that!

[@dudeinoakland]

@@joshkeeling82 Nima Arkani-Hamed finished his ph.d in 97. This series first aired in 2000. Nima first appeared in an episode in 2008. Though this clip may be on the old side he wasn't on TV in the 90s.

[@waldwassermann]

@@joshkeeling82 Could it be so that there is only one theory to begin with?

[@alphalunamare]

Thanks for the head's up .. I didn't bother to watch it 🙂

[@ChuckBrowntheClown]

So if it proves gravity is pretty weak, then I think that helps prove that gravity is temporal along with time being temporary. Can't keep away or hold down eternity forever.

[@moriahgamesdev]

Don't you eventually reach a place where the knowledge itself becomes meaningless? If you wanted to understand a page of text and you end up analysing what the ink is made of you've reached a point where the original quest for understanding has no relationship to what you are doing.

[@imrematajz1624]

You are right about knowledge, that is what you get by analysis. Analysis is taking the object apart. It is the reductionist method of inquiry. It answers the question how to. Knowledge is the skill, the know how. But it is not understanding. Understanding can only be acquired by identifying a larger containing whole, where the observed object is only a part. The direction of inquiry is opposite to analysis. It is called synthesis. Try this avenue, I find it more productive in the quest to understand the world.

[@seyedbanitaba5306]

Hi .... interconnectedness & Vibrations of NADA >> in the Deprh of Spirit s Mind s HEALING Modalities and the Paradigm Shift ** how are Quantum Healing plays a role

[@xspotbox4400]

Yes, every insignificant little thing can tip over the scales of space-time.

[@eriktempelman2097]

It's not just those two. Thermodynamics is equally important to include.

[@innertubez]

What if Space + Time = Gravity? Sorry, I have no idea what that means, just got carried away by these great discussions lol.

[@OdjoAdja]

so far to my understanding the terminology of 'quantum' is something that having the properties of 'conscious' and pardon me if it's wrong.. in case the gravity have the conscious as its property would be great if it can interact with human conscious so the 'de-gravitation' will be a way of levitation..

[@tacinmesa]

Quanta means discrete size. That's it. It's what you call the smallest packet of something. Something that is quantized just means that it's not randomly divisible in any old way. For example in the US, the money supply is quantized. The smallest Quanta of money is the penny. There are no half pennies, no 3/4 pennies. Money is quantized.

[@OdjoAdja]

thanks, some pseudoscience things also use the quantum terminology maybe referring the same meaning..

[@tarekazzam389]

Sounds to me like a Dynamical Hamburger Seller. If you replace the Term Hamburger with either Cadillac or Quantium - Spacetime, then you are on the Right Track!

[@MrNo____]

If a black hole was created by probing as discussed would it immediately evaporate?

[@Eyrie007]

Almost immediately. It would last for like picoseconds.

[@MrNo____]

@@Eyrie007 👍🏻

[@tolbaszy8067]

Heisenberg also said, most significantly, if you measure something you change it. Consciousness makes measuring unnecessary. Consciousness is Dark Energy. You only need a good tape measure.

[@tacinmesa]

No

[@quantumofspace1367]

Quantum gravity with dark energy comes out like this; all matter in the Universe around itself excite quantum space for expansion (pulsing by quantum oscillations of waves). But at the same time, the bodies, opposite each other, create wave interference with the expansion of the quantum space, for this reason, the pressure of the quantum space between the bodies will decrease, as a result of which the quantum gravitational attraction of the bodies arises ....

[@ThomasJr]

Is it possible that tiny black holes are created all the time and they are what we call dark matter?

[@stevecoley8365]

How do we fill a giant black hole in space called ignorance (greed) with light (love)...so that it's darkness (misery, murder, mass shootings, suicides, war, etc.) goes away and it's heavy gravitational pull stops sucking the joy out of life and destroying the planet?

[@pkul9583]

Time is relative and doesn’t slow down or speed up ⬆️ it is just an illusion

[@williambunting803]

That is all getting so close. The one element missing is an explanation as to why to make a particle (a large parcel of energy) move through space at an ever increasing speed you have to add an exponential amount of energy to make the particle approach the speed of light. Why is that? “That is just the way it is because of the Universal Constant” is not an answer. A better answer would be that the particle is moving through a field and that field becomes energized by the movement of the particle and the energy being applied is being imparted exponentially to the field. It is the field energy that gives the particle its mass. The inside out of that is the energy of the protons and the neutrons is contained and restrained by the exact same relationship. The quarks are the particle energy, and it is that particle energy reacting with the surrounding field, energizing the field in the same manner that is perceived as the nuclear strong force that contains the quarks, and the field energy dissipates as the square of the distance to create the nuclear weak force at one distance and then Gravity at another. Gravity isn’t a “curvature” of space time, it is field energy intensity gradient between empty space and the energy boundary of Protons and Neutrons. Particles move from the lowest field energy intensity (densest field of empty space) towards the highest field energy intensity and that field energy intensity gradient is gravity, and the energy source of the movement is from the particle itself acting against the field. Ie not a mystical force of attraction. Accumulations of matter increase the energy intensity gradient and matter moves faster towards it determined by the gradient (Gravity). So the strong Nuclear Force, the Weak Nuclear Force, and Gravity are all the same Force, energized 100% elastically by the particle energy acting against the Universal Field (the Higgs Field), very much as Nima alluded to.

[@ViralKiller]

This sounds very convincing, where can I read more?

[@williambunting803]

@@ViralKiller Sorry, VK, this is not a thing. This is my lateral thinking look at a mechanism to explain gravity, especially as there is no other seemingly homogeneous concept at present. I put this out there to promote thought. I am happy for someone to tear this to pieces conceptually if they have a more compelling alternative. For the time being this suits me fine and I derive pleasure from attempting to fit new science into this notion, or not.

[@kaellum4260]

He speaks of invariant information details called #Infons ...smart guy in all five dimensions.

[@yarednegede6162]

I believe that space and time are formed by the spinning of primordial element reaching at some critical spinning speed to initiate replication one at a time at enormously high speed that is what we call BIG BANG.Why we can't go beyond planks length is that all space is a replication of that primordial element and the plank time is the duration it takes to make one replica.

[@stevenwilgus5422]

The answers are so eloquent and simple, that to the educated contemporary, they may seem preposterous. Sadly, physics occasionally overlooks the simplicity in favor of the details. Quantum mechanics and Einstein reconcile through the gravity. (It is impossible to calculate to the precise center of the planet.) [ "I" exists as a single point, devoid of dimension- a true null.] The closer approximate the source, the more intense is gravity. Base nine is a priori, Base ten is manifestation-- or, the "exhalation" of base Nine. Therefore, Manifestation is always in a state of becoming. The a posteriori that we construct through space/time becomes/history. Gravity is simply the passing of both bases across an equal expanse=== == === ...= and covering all point(s) synchronic. Frequency exists across their unique scale. At Source, there is no gravity.

[@futureselfnow]

this guy is a brilliant genius. space-time is indeed doomed. and it doesn’t take a scientist to intuit this.

[@MrLeka1111]

What if gravity of black hole speed up super fluid toward itself and help to condense virtual elements we call atoms aldough we know that atoms are in the area of plank length... Gravity pool of black hole is whole galaxy.... I don't know but very nice story and thank you

[@8xnnr]

Creed?

[@Epiousios18]

It is hard to watch something like this and not think of William Blake's "Newton."

[@KaliFissure]

Gravity is continuous. There are quantum units of mass because nucleons have at their core a “neutralized” charge pair from the quark construction and these charge pairs do not disappear, instead they become a Planck freq photon which is now trapped over its own event horizon. This is matter unit. Time is a compact dimension. A single Planck second. Just enough time to rotate from past to present to present to future. This is charge. Negative is divergence (despite convention) it is expansive, from past to present. Positive charge is rotation from present to future. Convergence. This is why mass is associated with positive on this side of temporal membrane. Because the future is more dense. Gravity makes the next moment more dense. Neutron decay cosmology. The neutrons which invert at moment of neutron star collapse into black hole are transported via marangoni current to the surface of the universe, the lowest energy points in space, deep voids. There they travel 14ish relativistic minutes then decay into amorphous atomic hydrogen which causes a size increase of 10^14 times. This is lambda. This topology maintains the balance of the universe. The cmb is surface of visible universe but only this. We can only get an idea of local universe. The early stages of Big Bang are the neutron decay until formation into scintillating gas lensed all to heck by the entire visible universe. A single photon would be smeared across the sky. The Hubble Doppler is the curve in spacetime caused by the gravity of visible universe. EinsteinBranDicke I believe this notion is called.

[@das_it_mane]

Where are you getting this information?

[@ninemonthfall]

That's interesting and I'd like to learn more about it. Any links to share? The charge being oscillations from present to past was very interesting.

[@alebairos]

Gravity as Continuous: The assertion is that gravity is a continuous force, and the underlying reason is related to the quark construction of nucleons and their transformation into Planck frequency photons trapped over their event horizon. This is not a standard view in mainstream physics. Time as a Compact Dimension: This is a more speculative idea, suggesting that time is fundamentally quantized into discrete units, with each unit representing a Planck second. The rotation from past to present to future is described in terms of charge. The association of negative and positive charges with temporal rotation is an unconventional interpretation. Neutron Decay Cosmology: This theory proposes that when neutron stars collapse into black holes, the neutrons undergo a transformation and eventually surface at the universe's boundaries. As they decay, they contribute to the universe's expansion. This is not a standard cosmological model, and the idea of neutrons traveling to the "surface of the universe" is a novel concept. Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB): The claim here is that the CMB represents the surface of the visible universe and provides insights only into our local cosmic environment. While the CMB is indeed a snapshot of the early universe, the interpretation given in the comment is not consistent with mainstream cosmological views. Hubble Doppler and EinsteinBranDicke: The Hubble Doppler effect typically refers to the redshift of galaxies as they move away from us due to the universe's expansion. The comment seems to associate this with the curvature of spacetime due to the visible universe's gravity. The mention of "EinsteinBranDicke" likely refers to the Brans-Dicke theory, a scalar-tensor theory of gravity that was an alternative to General Relativity. However, the connection between the Hubble Doppler effect and the Brans-Dicke theory isn't clear from the comment. While the ideas presented by @KaliFissure are intriguing, they are not mainstream views in the scientific community. Many of these ideas would require rigorous mathematical formulation, experimental evidence, and peer review to be considered viable theories within the framework of modern physics. by chatgpt with gpt-4 and Advanced Data Analysis.

[@KaliFissure]

@@ninemonthfall first principles. Gravity is everywhere. Gravity makes things more dense. The future is more dense. The future is convergence. What is the center of atom? Mass. And positive charge. The future. Compression of space creates the positive charge.

[@Limoncellodeceptobro]

Scott Stapp from creed aged well!

[@8xnnr]

I was thinking the same thing

[@techteampxla2950]

I think one day we might open Pandora’s box and destroy earth looking for things we have no understanding or control over. It sounds so dangerous these high energy experiments.

[@existncdotcom5277]

.“I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don’t know the answer.” existnc

[@realcygnus]

Heavy Duty. Nima is indeed one of those dudes who gets whisked away by military helicopters in the middle of the night during an alien invasion or something. 😂

[@erockbrox8484]

The zooming in by the camera guy makes me laugh.

[@ThomasJr]

He stutters a lot, at times I feel like he's lost his train of thought. But he's a very smart guy nonetheless.

[@kallianpublico7517]

"...operationally measure..."

[@time-mechanics]

solved

[@russhamilton3800]

Black holes are just dead pixels...

[@charc4819]

Baby Nima. Look how cute he is! :-)

[@davesnowdon3869]

I hear less 80110ck5 in my local pub on a Friday night!

[@Mostmetalheartsurgeon]

I’m just a layman, but I don’t understand why it can’t just be that gravity does not have an effect on such small subatomic particles, or that it’s effect is so weak at those sizes, that it is overcome by the other forces.

[@faramarzharati7275]

its true that gravity in such small scales are over come by other force ...but what is the thing that give rise to gravity at larger scale ?if the curvature of space-time is emergent phenomenon...im just a layman whit bad eng

[@Mostmetalheartsurgeon]

@@faramarzharati7275 mass?

[@Mostmetalheartsurgeon]

Small particles have very small masses. More mass leads to more gravity? I’m not a physicist. I don’t even know if I’m making sense.

[@kaellum4260]

Geometric Unity, Observerse #PhilosophyOfTimeTravel #3767

[@pascalguerandel2771]

Smaller distances are much harder to separate the smaller it is the more harder it is to separate so you need a tremendous amount of energy to separate the small distances. The smaller it becomes the more energy you need. That's why you have the hadron collider. Another way of looking at it is the energy it takes to hold these tiny spaces together is so powerful and strong that we need something like the hadron collider to be able to break this up.

[@blacked2987]

8 24 10 22

[@tmcche7881]

What happens if the math does not exist to integrate the concepts of gravity, electromagnetic, the weak & strong, forces with quantum mechanics? How would we know? ps, ... are we going to build, at taxpayer expense, ever increasingly energetic synchrotons, or whatever-trons, until the physicists create a blackhole to end all human concerns about the structure of the universe? Only half joking.

[@brendawilliams8062]

Only intelligent Aliens can grasp binary. They are on the way with an answer for gravity and the standard model. Jokingly

[@BigNewGames]

You cannot make a miniature black hole. A black hole has never been created or measured with particle accelerators. It was pure speculation before the first collider came online. The idea was based on faulty math! And you use this faulty math as a way to explain quantum gravity? LOL. The reason for Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, why the velocity and trajectory of the particle cannot be measured simultaneously is because the particle when it's measured converts into information. The particle is way too small to measure both trajectory and velocity at the same time because the particle converts completely into the information upon being measured. Thus they can only be measured one particle at a time. Besides, if you knew what's causing gravity in mass you would understand why gravity cannot be measured at the Planck length. Gravity doesn't emerge until mass reaches a certain size and shape for this action to take place. Gravity does not happen at the quantum scale because the area around an atom or particle is way too tiny to produce the reactions pinned on gravity. This is not an advertisement. I just want you to know the answers are out there if you know where to look and what to look for. I found what is causing the observations pinned on dark matter and dark energy. Solving those two mysteries alone makes the books worth their weight in gold. I offer the books at the cost of publishing, printing the number of pages and shipping. I don't make a profit off them. Check them out, you won't find books with the same quality of information at that price anywhere. I recommend the paperbacks because they don't cost much. I wrote the series of quips explaining the cause of gravity, dark matter, dark energy, and many other mysteries of the universe in great detail. They're called SECRET UNIVERSE by Ron Kemp, books GRAVITY, ENERGY, FREQUENCY, VIBRATION, KINEMATICS in that order. The next book will be done before December. It will tie all previous books together.

[@emasolie4135]

Love Nima, but he no longer has all that hair. This is an oldie, but no doubt still his current positions.

[@eksffa]

NTS great/95

[@davidrandell2224]

The earth approaches the released object: Galilean relative motion; gravity. The search to “unify “ended in 2002.Why does this babble continue.

[@BossLevelPro]

Mmm hmm, yes, quite.

[@willnzsurf]

🌴😎💯

[@1SpudderR]

Hmm? The Planet Earth is equal to a Plank length when compared to The Scale of The Universe......Unlimited! Strikes me as if the Science we Are Using Requires Some extraordinaries Of thinking to get Scientists out of their Black Hole! Cannot wait for “Einstein Two”......and Then He/She unifying “0 Infinity and 1 Unlimited”!? So 0 is Time Infinite And 1 is Space Unlimited! Er? Quantum Two?

[@neelroy2918]

First physics shower.

[@33rdeegree]

F the quantum gravity when u got trias coin!!

[@shahidshaikh3046]

Hi my name is shahid shaikh i published the new law of physics that explained how gravity work for subatomic particle my paper is published in ijser known as international journel of scientific and engineering research Title of paper-shahid theory of quantum gravity

[@lembergsohn]

man you have no idea how annoying your stammering is. but but but, we we we we...try thinking before speaking instead of jumping into unswering questions while you are still trying to think of an answer and thus starting to stammer to buy some time for thinking. i'm sorry, i dont mean to be rude. i coldnt make it till the end because of that. although what you say is really fascinating.

[@joegeorge3889]

He's very smart but what physicist isn't

[@eternalsoul3439]

Space= Time Matter= Time Light = Time, When you measure something it's time, If there's nothing then there's no time... E= Mc2 T= Mc2 Where T is time from virtually nothing.

[@myce-liam]

random bs = random bs your comment = random bs my comment = random bs, when you read it it's pure random bs... Me = Mc2 U = Mc2

[@mayukhpurkayastha2649]

0 And 1 Very very mystical number. 0 created space and multiple Un?verse.

[@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC]

*"0 And 1 Very very mystical number."* ... ...A lot is happening between *0* and *1.*

[@keninboulder76]

They are not mystical, they are simply interesting

[@sillymesilly]

@@keninboulder76 what is 1/0? it is undefined correct? Say nothing in nature is in vain. Therefore 0 is mysterious

[@AshtonMotana]

it's so significant because it keeps the grant money flowing. There's no such thing as time.

[@ChuckBrowntheClown]

The more energy you put into a smaller space it collapses into a black hole. Hell is known as the bottomless pit. There's definitely a massive energy that goes against God.

[@justinwhite368]

With respect this guy is blinding you with a dish of scientific jargon spaghetti. The threads the spaghetti are all jumbled up. It sounds like he is saying something, but not really.

[@das_it_mane]

Everything he said made sense. I'm not a scientist. Which part didn't you get?

[@justinwhite368]

@@das_it_mane Hi. If you're not a scientist then does it matter. I'd suggest you should go read up on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. There are quantities called paired observables; momentum and distance, energy and time. Unfortunately for Nima's proposition, energy is made up of photons, light particles, but distance or space is a somewhat arbitrary measurement. Basically it doesn't matter how many photons that is how much energy one directs at a certain point in space it's not going to create a black hole. The Universe isn't that flimsy. Black holes are merely one kind of explanation for certain astrophysical phenomena but not the only one. Did you get all that? I agree more or less with Sabine Hossenfelder that physicists have become Lost In Math which is the title of her book.

[@maxwellsimoes238]

Einstein space time was proof, so Nina concept space time not proof. Thedefore Einstein genius while Nina concept is phiscs wortheless. He pedantic,baseless fundament phiscs. Drunken rambling.

[@Eyrie007]

Says the person who can't get his name right or spell words correctly.

[@futureselfnow]

over your head

[@SelectCircle]

This guy strikes me as someone who at the end of the day just wants to hang out with his pals - eating burgers and drinking beer - physics the furthest thing from his mind. Or in other words ... I don't believe for an instant he's a real scientist.

[@HyzersGR]

Thanks for sharing.

[@spacemooseable]

The man has a difficult time speaking. Very frustrating.

[@erichandbury6321]

Yes, he either has a slight stammer or, most likely with physicists, his mind is faster than his mouth. I noticed it but it didn't distract me from his message.

[@HyzersGR]

He’s trying to explain a very complicated topic in a way that a lay person can understand. Not an easy job.

[@devanairemccallister4194]

Nima got his teeth fixed, he looks a lot better