I wish more writers and authors would be invited to these shows. That was what made The Report and Daily Show so great: they had all kinds of people on for interviews, and even if they weren't "celebrities," they were still interesting guests. If we would showcase writers and intellectuals more, perhaps we could get America reading and thinking again.
@dubulous44555 жыл бұрын
so great? youre an idiot.
@timothywalker12795 жыл бұрын
GuppyPal agree
@jerrysherman27434 жыл бұрын
@@dubulous4455 What is WRONG with you?
@Mmm-vs3rt4 жыл бұрын
@@jerrysherman2743 a few marbles missing from their brain methinks
@matthewminix61673 жыл бұрын
Colbert tried that for his first month or so on this program... and his ratings sunk. His early guest lists were precisely what you suggest- and no one watched. So he had to retool and get the celebrity guests to keep the show afloat. Sad, but true.
@francismuiruri90644 жыл бұрын
Discovered him yesterday cannot get enough. Malcolm Gladwell I salute you.
I really like Stephen Colbert's version of The Late Show, because he addresses important topics and talks to people that most other hosts don't. I really like his approach.
@skaarphy57978 жыл бұрын
Me too. So glad he took over. Never seen Letterman genuinely invested, or even interested, in what he was doing. For me that aloofness got old very quickly.
@GreyJedi178 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Only colbert can think of having Gladwell in to talk about a podcast. Love both of them.
@WintersNstuff8 жыл бұрын
the fact that hes using one of the largest platforms in media for good speaks volumes about stephen colbert, hes the man
@YPeezy8 жыл бұрын
Colbert is ultra talented
@quinnc19448 жыл бұрын
I have noticed though that the majority of his interviews are left leaning, where he helps the interviewees out, but whenever he brings on a right wing person he tries to discredit their claims...
@mipmip57595 жыл бұрын
Just was linked here from the Jimmy Kimmel interview, very different vibe. Colbert flattens the interview into platitudes while Kimmel leaves more space, which if you had asked me beforehand I would have guessed the other way around.
@empireoflightz5 жыл бұрын
Not sure why you would've expected that, both of them have interviews where they seem to try too much and don't let their guest speak but Colbert does it much more often
@KathyTOEFLTeacherLessons5 жыл бұрын
Sooooo true!!
@jimmyboyle35435 жыл бұрын
oflightz yea I certainly didn’t expect Colbert to be so dismissive and combative with such a serious intellectual but here we are
@apricity29945 жыл бұрын
@@jimmyboyle3543 it's as if Colbert thinks it's a competition. It seems like he doesn't want to be outshined.
@JABS9915 жыл бұрын
Colbert engages more. He pushes back to explore and define the concept. But Jimmys good too.
@rockninsockn6 жыл бұрын
I love how Gladwell is being authentic in the show and make the conversation much more human than usually at these shows.
@Azphadel8 жыл бұрын
Malcolm Gladwell is by far my favorite author! I had never fallen in love with a nonfiction book until I read his books.
@TheFamousMockingbird5 жыл бұрын
You should not consider gladwell's writing as unquestioned truth. He has a very long history of intellectual dishonesty, often misrepresenting things what at this point is starting to seem is done intentionally
@breeleigh20025 жыл бұрын
Azphadel and now you’re addicted, right?? Lol
@kimberleful4 жыл бұрын
Cant wait to join the club just found out about him yest. Luke i was under a rock
@louisefromscotland33365 жыл бұрын
For all of us actually interested in what he was trying to say 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
@nozecone5 жыл бұрын
I have no idea what all those squares and female-symbols are supposed to mean - but I think I agree.
@joyandpeacefullaughter53073 жыл бұрын
Me too. The interviewer was trying to make everyone laugh it was so annoying.
@psd19555 жыл бұрын
"You think with your eyes and feel with your ears." @1:33
@appletree68984 жыл бұрын
I mean...music? But...art?
@sarahafzal71835 жыл бұрын
Aw man i felt sad when he wanted to say something at the end but colbert cut him off. I know there s a time crunch. It just made me sad 🤷 . He s so interesting to listen to. Didn't want him to stop
@irenebritt51155 жыл бұрын
Of COURSE Stephen had Malcolm Gladwell as a guest. Mr. Colbert is the only intellectually stimulating talk show host on air. Thank you for being you. Keep the quality bar high, sir.
@tierrapetersen46514 жыл бұрын
I just listened to the interview from the mennonite man at work today and I was crying. I don't do that ever. Especially not at work. Malcolm is a genius storyteller, I love this man.
@kali25938 жыл бұрын
thank you i needed a new podcast to listen too
@JDBenavidez8 жыл бұрын
You won't regret it.
@ramseyphdone69268 жыл бұрын
I heart Mr.Gladwell's glasses.
@OrionoftheStar8 жыл бұрын
Good stories can still make you cry. I've read a few where I just felt ragged, torn, and empty when I finished them.
@alvinrozon26878 жыл бұрын
Colbert, your show just keeps getting better.
@theOnyFUFU8 жыл бұрын
Kinda wish he'd have more of an edge in his monologues (like he did when the show started), instead of going with the trend of cuddly puppy dog (like Fallon) but I love the show nonetheless!
@theOnyFUFU8 жыл бұрын
+Jogoh Luther could be. his monologues don't have as much attitude in them as they did when he started but I could be wrong; I haven't watched a full episode in a while.
@thsu87 жыл бұрын
Leno still better.
@ethantwolfe5 жыл бұрын
Fawad B C
@sarahsulwey21467 жыл бұрын
Absolutely amazing author. The Tipping Point and Outliers
@PhillyFrank17 жыл бұрын
I can think of written work that makes me cry -- every time. Part of it is how well one can comprehend and, hence, "feel" what one is reading.
@jojomakes5 жыл бұрын
How is it possible for one person to look Black, White, Asian, Latino, Native American, young, old, male and female at the same exact time?
@nozecone5 жыл бұрын
Not fat and skinny, though.
@cherylmaclean36898 жыл бұрын
I've read many of Malcolm Gladwell's books and "Outliers' is one of my favourite books I've ever read. So fascinating!
@hola07268 жыл бұрын
Love gladwell's glasses! And his books. Will definitely listen to his podcast
@rileyhowerzyl3 жыл бұрын
His episode “Generous Orthodoxy” on Revisionist History brought me to tears so I definitely agree. His statements about seeing versus hearing are not definitive and I don’t think he intended them to be, but at least for Gladwell as an author I can say that I cried when hearing his podcast rather than while reading his books.
@emilylashelle81228 жыл бұрын
It's funny because he critiques Colbert's methods of satire in the last episode
@mj_dj7 жыл бұрын
As far as I recall his critique was that there is such a big gap between Colbert the person they met backstage and the right-wing caricature he portrayed on the Report that people were often blindsided when they were confronted with the persona on air, which made it difficult for some to adjust to the format of the show. This in turn led to a lot of political ambiguity where some (mostly right-wingers) saw the Report-Colbert as exposing the left-wing/liberals as not even having a grip on their own ideas or not being able to defend themselves properly (which, by the design of the heightened and satirical nature of the character obviously wasn't his intention).
@ms.disapoint48085 жыл бұрын
he doesn't critique Colbert's methods. He says he's a genius because of how Colbert is able to appeal to both sides of the audience: the conservatives and the Liberal. What he critiques is satires effectiveness in political discussions.
@SteveSilverActor5 жыл бұрын
As an actor, I found this interview very interesting. For some, laughing comes much easier than crying. For others, it's the reverse. Both, however, require vulnerability.
@mikee7023 жыл бұрын
@Cuthbert Bracegirdle lol agreed. That's hardly a groundbreaking thought.
@belforio7 жыл бұрын
First time I've heard of this Malcolm fella. I need more!
@tmarcato2228 жыл бұрын
I think both laughter and emotional moments are both important. It's just what you're looking for.
@sharpieRulestheWorld3 жыл бұрын
Homecoming King by Hasan Minhaj is a good example of one that beautifully blurs the line of laugher & sadness while packing meaning
@solarplexus78 жыл бұрын
Making you cry will make you remember it more, but when something is funny, people are more likely to revisit it. Schindler's List vs Anchorman.
@TylerMatthewSimpson8 жыл бұрын
True, but it's obvious which of those is a more important piece of art.
@MyManD8 жыл бұрын
Wholeheartedly agree. Brick Tamland killing a man with a trident is a seminal moment in the history of cinema.
@Lameducks8 жыл бұрын
Tyler you're completely right, Ill never forget what Anchorman did for my life. It touched my soul in ways you couldn't imagine.
@ourlordandsaviorbrendanfra44288 жыл бұрын
I see what you did there. . .
@TheZombieoutbreak8 жыл бұрын
you are right. i still have not laughed as hard as when i first watched schindlers list
@1111hami8 жыл бұрын
We, or I, always think of Colbert as being intellectual. Then a guy like Gladwell comes on and Stephen shows he is a light weight in comparison.
@sfar0248 жыл бұрын
I don't think it's level of intellect that differs but tapping into the depths of emotional intelligence that is human in its core
@jennysmith95914 жыл бұрын
They are both pretty damn smart. Stephen is a dazzling performer who often gets laughs at others' expense and, Malcolm Gladwell is an introspective genius who comes across as a much more self-effacing and modest person, and appears a lot more naive in some ways than he actually is. That's how they seem to present themselves, anyway. Who would win the actual smackdown of wits, it's hard to say, but this would be a good matchup for Jake Kalish's "Santa vs. Satan".
@GreyJedi178 жыл бұрын
Revisionist History is so so good!
@kimberleful4 жыл бұрын
Im going to listen
@MsGrapeNehi8 жыл бұрын
I respectfully disagree with Mr. Gladwell. Books make me cry like nothing else can. To Kill a Mockingbird, Of Mice and Men, and Flowers for Algernon made me cry like a little bitch.
@Anna-ip8ub8 жыл бұрын
but it takes a longer time and it take building up and setting up. P.S> I cried too on all these stories.
@BoxcarBomber8 жыл бұрын
Just read Flowers For Algernon two months ago; fucked my shit up.
@rockhero22748 жыл бұрын
I agree. I read Caleb Carr's Angel of Darkness. I was sad.
@slightly_handy21098 жыл бұрын
Shantaram
@nickholmes33718 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I'm not sure he really had a chance to get across what he meant there. It is a lot easier to build a connection with someone emotionally when you can hear their voice or see their face. Books can make you cry sure, but not as quickly.
@JLMac3228 жыл бұрын
U of T represent!
@eshepard85657 жыл бұрын
Go "state school"! :P He's forgotten how to say Toronto, though. I think he's been away too long.
@AndrewSmith-vh3gu8 жыл бұрын
Drama = drama. Comedy = drama + funny. It's extra. It's more. What makes us sad is more universal than what we laugh at, which differs person to person, culture to culture, and depends more on intellect than sadness does.
@warsilver998 жыл бұрын
My favourite author! He's so insightful!
@jessewarner79625 жыл бұрын
This is a really great interview, on both sides.
@flappycelery3 жыл бұрын
OK, this grabbed me. I was just scrolling by, listened to 10 seconds and went, "Wait a minute. I gotta check this out!"
@tebbytee8 жыл бұрын
I've certainly cried reading books. A lot. Also, I feel like there can been many memorable moments in my life that have been full of laughter as opposed to tears.
@ilove29295 жыл бұрын
HE IS BACK. I AM THRILLED ❤❤❤❤
@JazzyJonas Жыл бұрын
It flew under my radar at first, but the bit where Stephen cried over Malcolm being better at making people cry than he is at making people laugh was brilliant.
@audretwelch33288 жыл бұрын
Stephen would be a great dinner party host
@philipq68448 жыл бұрын
Sadwell's stories make me cry. My favorite book is Outcriers. David and GoCryeth.
@bossgandy5 жыл бұрын
Philip Q 🤣
@astheskylarksings8 жыл бұрын
man.. Gladwell is getting paid, but he must also have a tough life because it takes so much effort for him to prove the obvious to people. And they also discredit the work he puts in with research. I've never really seen Colbert proven wrong before. Gladwell would be the first--tears are definitely stronger than laughter.
@amandariviera8 жыл бұрын
All feelings are valid. The point is to make people FEEL through media; to experience something they wouldn't have otherwise felt. You can cry for a myriad of reasons, it doesn't have to be sorrow or pain, but relief, happiness or just generally feeling overwhelmed with too many emotions at one point. If you can make someone cry (without attacking), it is a very powerful thing. Especially for those of us who have trouble crying.
@robbiepena62408 жыл бұрын
starting to love colbert on late night more and more
@LopsidedPasta8 жыл бұрын
I've read all of his books. Some are accurate, some are not. But they're all very entertaining! Great guest!
@SofaKingThug8 жыл бұрын
A lot of anecdotal sorta stuff but definitely entertaining.
@LopsidedPasta8 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't go that far. All of his books have elements of truth, but you need to filter out the crazier stuff. If you read his material with objectivity then you'll learn a lot without learning crap.
@samuelcharles62208 жыл бұрын
You wouldn't go that far? The video is titled "i just want to explain things to people", and he's constantly explaining them wrong. Gladwell is the worst kind of shill and snake oil salesman, one who knows what he's serving is lies, but he puts them in nice enough packaging to make millions of people less intelligent, instead of just you.
@astheskylarksings8 жыл бұрын
name one lie he "serves." all of this criticism, but not one concrete point
@samuelcharles62208 жыл бұрын
www.businessinsider.com/new-study-destroys-malcolm-gladwells-10000-rule-2014-7 Why don't you just google 'Malcolm Gladwell idiot'?
@kaylaempson57888 жыл бұрын
Malcolm Gladwell just explained John Green's genius.
@smujismuj8 жыл бұрын
The eyes vs ears theory is pretty thin. Ever see a photo of an injured child? They both can be the medium for strong emotions. Why over simplify things?
@nancya72895 жыл бұрын
I assumed that Gladwell was talking about processing language: reading versus listening.
@popcorn_TM8 жыл бұрын
i love this man already!!!
@Anchony8 жыл бұрын
Well this interview makes me Glad!
@DaveToneMusic8 жыл бұрын
Great interview Stephen!
@regmunday83547 жыл бұрын
Thing is, laughter isn't an emotion: it's a pleasurable experience but it's innately superficial; unlike real, deep, heartfelt emotion.
@donnagalegilbert8 жыл бұрын
Very entertaining and interesting.
@eunheechang9203 жыл бұрын
As a person innvolved in higher education for a living, his statistic on the IVY league schools and the endowments, that's so spot on just as he always is!
@michaelchen35658 жыл бұрын
Great to hear a bit with content and levity.
@abishai20104 жыл бұрын
I am so glad Mr. Colbert disagreed with the fact that writing does not move people emotionally. This is one other reason (apart from LOTR) I am a fan of Mr. Colbert. Every forum has it's adv and dis-adv but I strongly believe in books and reading, it is one of the most powerful media of moving people. I learn from this video on how to disagree with people gracefully and using humor!!
@jsgoyburu4 жыл бұрын
I disagree completely. He even suggested that laughter is not a "real emotion". Laughter is not only powerful. It's freeing
@stevehines75204 жыл бұрын
We surely have developed a societal perception that crying only has negative context. In my personal experience thus far the greatest moments of joy remembered are ones accompanied by tears. Even in the world of humor there is a statement "laugh until you cry" in my memory of laughing so hard that my eyes watered, the topic that started the laughter has long since been forgotten ( yet the fact that these scenarios are usually experienced among the closest of companions is the only relevant thing that remains) these tears that were the result of a deeper emotional connection to human family are the only ones that have been ingrained in my memory to a degree that that the joy of that moment needs no definition save the realization of deeper thread of connection to others.
@ClareBearBunny5 жыл бұрын
I was actually rejected from the history PhD programs at Harvard, Yale, and Stanford this month. Now I don't feel so bad.
@CHallYoung8 жыл бұрын
Bravo!!!
@mitchtherevolution4 жыл бұрын
You think with your eyes and feel with your ears. This is what we consider an intellectual now... Yeah, that makes me want to cry.
@MrSCRIBR8 жыл бұрын
Killing it with the Sneans!
@Zeratul7238 жыл бұрын
Good interview.
@xiomanaxoxoxo32125 жыл бұрын
Ultimately he is a teacher.
@VitaminMePlease8 жыл бұрын
Why do people hate Malcolm Gladwell so much? I'm actually curious, really.
@jayrama87697 жыл бұрын
inaccuracies, he's an interesting dude tho but a lot of the time when making points they are inaccurate, for example i heard him telling a story about david vs goliath and he said a rock would come out of david's slingshot "around 35 meters per second which is substantially faster than the best pitchers in fastball" (loosely quoted) but that 35 meters per second equals about 78 mph and every pitcher in MLB can pitch over 90 mph... I think little things like that make people hate on him, i'll admit myself it makes me question his credibility which is really shouldn't because its a small part of his story, but idk it's human nature i guess when facts are falsely presented
@Bouncybon6 жыл бұрын
Jealous of his wealth, probably.
@nickfromCO8 жыл бұрын
Didn't know Art Garfunkel was supposed to be on the show.
@bodybalancer7 жыл бұрын
Cool! He's a great author!!!! I've read "Blink", which I couldn't put down. I've got The Tipping Point which is also really interesting and good to put down BC it's kind of a compilation of many vignettes or short stories / case examples. Highly recommend picking up any of his works to people!!! 👍✌️✨
@derekmalaney69458 жыл бұрын
More interviews like this.
@yaldabaoth28 жыл бұрын
It's so much better to see Stephen discuss things with intelligent people than to see him pander to actors who have new, crappy movie out.
@dalicloud97 жыл бұрын
His podcast is pretty incredible.
@beritbranch49496 жыл бұрын
the LAST thing we need is a litany of woe
@pensivenincompoop20168 жыл бұрын
Gladwell = greatness
@wezsoo8 жыл бұрын
Oh c'mon, Northwestern is PRETTY MUCH an Ivy League, Colbert. Arrrrggghhh.
@IceColdProfessional4 жыл бұрын
That's Maclom Gladwell y'all. He's a renowned physicist and wine condessur.
@goathead48318 жыл бұрын
He said cocktail chatter bait. Chaturbate lmao.
@penname84417 жыл бұрын
I had to stop and look away from the screen to make the voice match up because I didn't know what his face looked like and this tripped me out
@pederheibergsverdrup60738 жыл бұрын
He is a bit awkward. Colbert makes it a bit hard for him.
@mattiafioravanti84756 жыл бұрын
I think he refers to this fact on one of Revisionist history's episode.
@dearthofdoohickeys47035 жыл бұрын
Mattia Fioravanti yeah he does, it’s very enlightening.
@suesheification5 жыл бұрын
He's not awkward you just have a narrow mind
@zacharybrooks41694 жыл бұрын
HOW?! can u elaborate? he was awesome and so was steven. They played off each other so well. He gave insightful and genuine responses off the cuff. I'd put my money on "you saw his hair and physique and stuffed him into a pigeon hole and checked- out,"
@RichardAveryiii8 жыл бұрын
I love this guy!
@peteradams15888 жыл бұрын
I've cried properly in one book...Lonesome Dove when Gus dies...I think he has a point.
@andymiller59988 жыл бұрын
Love the late show!!!
@rouvee77885 жыл бұрын
4:03 we protect ourselves from each other not because we are afraid that people don't want to hear our real feelings but because we are afraid of the judgement we will receive from people we expose ourselves to. humans are constantly and naturally fearful every single day even in our own homes. pause and reflect on it.
@nozecone5 жыл бұрын
We protect ourselves from each other because people are dangerous.
@williamthechang8 жыл бұрын
Cocktail chatter, Slate Political Gabfest! I see you Stephen Colbert.
@AimeeRose228 жыл бұрын
Shout out to Slate Political Gabfest with 'cocktail chatter!' Love it!
@carlyflores55646 жыл бұрын
did my lang summer packet on one of his books. really made writing the 10 essays about his points/commentaries enjoyable
@jaduzink8 жыл бұрын
On Fareed Zakaria, Gladwell just ridiculed the Olympics for holding running events in "equatorial Brazil" in July forgetting that July is winter in the Southern Hemisphere. Brilliant man, right?
@jamesl93715 жыл бұрын
University of Toronto! Yeah
@JoeCnNd5 жыл бұрын
I had a connection flight in Toronto and gotta say it's the worst in airports trying to get home. Sorry I hear Toronto and think that. Lol
@endlessmidnight89128 жыл бұрын
I attended one of those well-endowed schools. I used to think the donations were outrageous. Lately, I've come to see the value of gathering together the minds of greatest potential and providing them abundant resources. Besides. some of those billions come from alumni, giving back to their alma mater.
@Silvana7167 жыл бұрын
One of the most brilliant contemporary writers.
@jeremiah817tx5 жыл бұрын
Wonder why the band went with the song backstabber for his intro.
@Sankrityayan078 жыл бұрын
Like every alternative view, Malcolm Gladwell's are often interesting but also mostly not inaccurate.
@peterkenjosian10505 жыл бұрын
agree, not inaccurate at all.
@kartikmessner28684 жыл бұрын
Pretentious sentence ?
@sada01018 жыл бұрын
This was nice.
@resonanttotality83226 жыл бұрын
When you cry, you then see and understand the reason why you laugh...
@gpjk41728 жыл бұрын
He's a good communicator and popularizer, but if you know anything about the subjects he's covering, Gladwell's books can be painfully tedious. I feel like most of them could be summarized in 10 pages and only lose filler.
@redlion1458 жыл бұрын
Not everyone is an economist or game theorist. Like he said, he's writing for a wide audience, he wants "to explain things to people" not write academic focused work.
@HitomiAyumu6 жыл бұрын
Irish Identity Exactly.
@rosadeplata17523 жыл бұрын
Um... I cried when Dobby died... In the book. Had to stop reading. Tears were in the way.
@MizCeeA5 жыл бұрын
I have cried reading many books, I have laughed while reading others. While I enjoy Mr. Gladwell, I disagree on this point. It is undoubtedly difficult, but it is done with great regularity. NOW, making someone think deeply? That is rare!
@ClwydEnComu5 жыл бұрын
When you cry from a book though it's probably because you've spent so many hours invested in a journey. When listening, it can take minutes - seconds even - and you can register subconsciously their emotions in their voices, you relate it immediately to your experiences and mix your own in simultaneously, you empathise with them and cry. But all of that within moments and with no effort, just receiving, not consuming and translating script to words to feelings on your own.
@nozecone5 жыл бұрын
Trouble is, Gladwell's train of thought kept getting knocked off the track by Colbert's smart-ass interruptions. He was obviously struggling to try to remember what exactly his point was, the direction of what he had previously said, and exactly what the question had been. In the process, he kind of got himself turned around, and was doing his best to try to salvage an interview that Colbert seemed intent on sabotaging for cheap laughs.
@ethicalhacker878 жыл бұрын
I think its also a culture, thing. In eastern cinema, its much more common for a film to make you cry than laugh. So in our minds there, we 'find' that making someone cry seems to come a lot easier. Here it is sort of the opposite. I see what Gladwell is talking about.
@cristianrojas40838 жыл бұрын
My hero!!!
@juliet38275 жыл бұрын
It's funny that it's never mentioned he's not American. He's Canadian (and born in England.)
@sellingacoerwa83185 жыл бұрын
He lives in New York has since forever and has citizenship so idk what you mean by "not American"
@genuinelyjag5 жыл бұрын
5:41 Shoulda gone with "I just want my phone call."
@rumples5848 жыл бұрын
This interview was missing something. If I had to pinpoint it, I would say it's missing the 2nd level thought. What I mean is that there is usually the first more obvious line of thinking, and then there is the next step in the train of thought that is less obvious and requires more rigorous mental work. Crying is more impactful than laughter and then what? I've been following his youtube channel "Revisionist History" and I think it does a great job going after the details and the why and the significance and having interesting stories to boot. Granted I know this was an interview on a comedic show, two facts that are contrary to my normal exposure to him in his podcast with a more serious tone. It was cool to see this, just expected even more interesting material from Colbert and Gladwell, two people I believe are very intelligent.
@g-wm63928 жыл бұрын
for the record , Laughing releases dopamine , which makes us feel good , Now i'm not saying we should laugh like a moron at everything , but a genuine good laugh makes the world go round SO QUIT TORTURING YOURSELF . LAUGH AND CLOSE KZbin ALREADY GOD DAMMIT 😂
@smithsoniansamurai70438 жыл бұрын
Yeah, this interview sucked... Colbert completely failed as an interviewer. There is almost no information or creation of interest in the podcast. They spent most of the time in a back and forth about the whole crying/laughing thing.
@johnclhugyugihjbvgbkj97296 жыл бұрын
As the writer of, “Outliers,” you’d think he’d not be a repeater 😄