Communism Socialism Capitalism by Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev

[@tangohotellima1895]

Sadhguru's insightful discourse decimates the arguments of "progressive socialism". What's being unsaid (by the latter, so also not addressed by Sadhguru) is the effect of current monetary structures, where money and notional wealth can be created out of thin air!

[@tyty0071]

Communism and Socialism ignores human nature, which is why it will never work.

[@kkb2687]

The level of clarity is just amazing

[@Pestbringer89]

clearly greed helping others doesnt work while half of the world population lives in abject poverty.

[@aruundadhich1509]

In capitalism; health education and all public services need money that lead a person to work more and gain exorbitant profits by any means. We do not have assured system in capitalism to refrain from greed. So sadhguru you should have given good clarification.

[@adipratap8103]

That is not true, capitalism is where People can hold means of production. That is it. Even the Scandinavian countries are open market economies having free healthcare.

[@hardikdubey4199]

@@adipratap8103 they have free healthcare and free education cuz they pay (average citizen ) about 50% of their income in taxes with average GDP per capita around $ 50 000 search it... You can't tax people as high as 50 with GDP per capita around $2700

[@KuroKarma]

@@adipratap8103 Wtf man seizing the means of production for the common people is step one of socialism. So you're saying we are already in a socialist world? wow...

[@adipratap8103]

@@KuroKarma i did not use the word seizing or for common people. When I said people hold the means of productuon, it means any individual or group.

[@Justme-fz1ng]

@@hardikdubey4199 Yes,and socialist countries have had the lowest taxes. Scandinavian countries are not socialist

[@navins4328]

Communism is not individuals sharing their things and money among them as he said.that can be related with socialism which means the 'public ownership of production system'.basic idea of communism is not just financial equality. Its total equity of the human from all comprehensive aspects.

[@ksh575]

Eventually through ECONOMY. Only parameter on what you said what was to be fixed was through ECONOMY. So Sadhguru by default counted the only parameter Economy on which what you say will be looked upon.

[@HellBoy-tl8oc]

do u expect him to represent communism fairly?? how will he defame it then ?

[@SachinKSahu]

This sadhguru is nerd who is saying that poor can not change the system by their social movement. It means any poor leader should not enter into the system as he doesn't have money or means. This cult is funded by capitalists to voice for them. One of the worst explaining socialism.

[@martinmadrazo1781]

@@SachinKSahu But there are so many fools in our country thinking thst he id a great mentor. Capitalism works for 1st world countries. Socialism is the only thing that works for a country like India.

[@goutamboppana961]

@@martinmadrazo1781 capitalism works for first world countries ?? lol the first world countries are losing faith in capitalism

[@nfstaughtmedriving6540]

"You cannot redistribute the wealth which hasn't been created yet"

[@snapblast1782]

wow! very interesting..

[@ck3289]

Communism gives me an idea of ‘why the f should i work if someone is already doing it for me! ‘ Vedic society was the the best....both for humans and animals...when modified with democracy it suits the indians well!

[@yinyang6977]

Ah yes, good old Vedic society where humans sacrificed animals for meals and equality.

[@darbyshujo5045]

because when u work under socialism the fruit of your labour goes back into your community instead of going to some capitalist who was born lucky not to mention this has been done countless times before the advent of capitalism and its export through colonialism because there are other factors to which people work for but the current system has made it so its only profit where if u dont work for someone else u are denied the most basic human resources

[@tamal704]

As per Sadhguru profit and greed is good ... but is this applicable to the one controlling the factors driving the Market ... Also is it good in sectors like public health, education, security, sanitization etc. ....Also do not forget it that it is always profitable to take bribe as profit is the main motive not the work

[@hardikdubey4199]

Isn't that "greed" to generate money with some innovation helped the world? BTW the phone or PC you are using is because of capitalism so, stop buying phone that is generating greed in the eyes of the manufacturer

[@arnikchakraborty1553]

rf4life ... lol.... isnt it that doctors love in privatised health sector too the same thing ? i guess you will understand now

[@theyouth4682]

Get lost you commutard, you guys have caused much problem to the world

[@RaviSingh-fv4sh]

Sadhguru is living proof of greed. All Gurus survive by greed only.

[@jaykay2218]

@@theyouth4682 no, we haven’t you degenerate

[@tamal704]

And finally what if the person driving the market factors (as per Sadhguru 'the Lion') is racially or regionally or religiously biased, then are the market factors going to be influenced???

[@yungman7053]

The only religion capitalist care about is money.So no biases will be there

[@kevinkemble3718]

Rocky704 ; my guess “karma” what oks makes themselves is taking on personal responsibility. That’s it period

[@kevinkemble3718]

Aditya Samal ; so tell me more about your “religion capitalist.” Capitalism as a religion? What book states that?

[@aishchaudhary8840]

@@yungman7053 he said if 🙄 bro ..

[@jaykay2218]

@@yungman7053 you’re factually incorrect

[@vhmsrecords6096]

Yes, the one flaw Karl mark had was doesn't focused on human psychology

[@researcher3248]

the diff is the greedy over rules the needy

[@phantomblaster8462]

Your definition is fundamentally flawed. Free market capitalism is the best. You get political freedom and most importantly you have freedom of being driven by the market

[@Justme-fz1ng]

@@phantomblaster8462 Not at all. Socialism is far better. U will have all your freedoms under socialism too. U will also remove the exploitation present under capitalism

[@Vlog-hu8gb]

No narcissists manipulate the foolish masses, weather communism or captilism. At least capitalism gives a smart person some option to get ahead

[@user-74856]

@@Vlog-hu8gb true

[@tamilstatusvideosandshorts1074]

@@Vlog-hu8gb if capitalism head person is not so smart, it affect mass of people

[@vulcan8288]

And when you don't have courage to expose scandal of religion you build a shiva idol

[@jeanniemaycrawford4466]

Wtf are you talking about?

[@gaurangkarmakar4046]

And when you don't have courage to say MINORITY APPEASEMENT, you shout SECULARISM.

[@vulcan8288]

@@gaurangkarmakar4046 hopefully secularism doesn’t teach you to unalive your wife

[@gaurangkarmakar4046]

@@vulcan8288 But it sure teaches us the Shah Bano and the Saira Banu philosophy of Shariah based gender egalitarianism, doesn't' it?

[@sachinmahajanllb]

क्या हम Crony capitalism अर्थात घोर पूंजीवाद के युग में जी रहे हैं ? Crony capitalism अर्थात अफ़सर , नेता एवं पूंजीपतियों का गठजोड़ | क्या Crony capitalism की समस्या का समाधान निम्न प्रकार से किया जा सकता हैं :- (1) गरीब , मजदूर एवं मध्यम वर्ग को न्यूनतम आवश्यकता की वस्तुऍ एवं सेवाए मुफ्त या कम दर पर उपलब्ध करवाना | (2) गरीब , मजदूर एवं मध्यम वर्ग के बच्चों , महिला एवं बुजुर्गो को कुछ धनराशि सीधे ही बैंक एकाउंट में उपलब्ध करवाना |

[@raymondleemeadows4969]

Hoarding financial wealth is the problem - like a clot in the blood stream. Those who wish to evade their taxes and hoard their money in offshore tax havens like dragons guarding their gold within it's cave are the real problem. Tax fairly and reinvest and everybody wins - the market grows so more money and opportunity can be made.

[@mattyamato5060]

That would be true if people still " kept money in a jar under their bed", people put their money in banks. banks are in the business of lending, were do u think the banks get the money from to lend to people who want to start a business, buy a house ect...

[@aagantuk7370]

@@mattyamato5060 money laundering, swiss banks, and yes, jars under the bed

[@YashKansalx]

I think if we have lower taxes then it would help

[@kevinkemble3718]

raymondleemeadows ; read your post. It’s all theory you are suggesting. It’s an age old perspective Sadhguru just went over with you. ................................raymondleemeadows ; you are describing socialism. Broke people give them $1200 dollars gone next week.. come on man. I had much & little. Little is what time I put in to effort & income reflects it. Stop running up debt and watch your life become much less stressed out. Might take time ....however you won’t regret it. It’s a market economy and the bartering way of life is not sustainable. This is the 21st Century, of the Information Age. Capitalism by definition is exchange of information. You can earn it without buying it. I know that sounds weird, however it’s true. It is a mindset. Stop having your two hands work for money. Have dollars go work for you. Why get paid on Friday and go buy junk that will never earn a return. Big box shopping malls is a set up for complete financial failure for you as a consumer & a financial gain for their risk taking on a business arrangement with banks & stockholders. You are their slaves to a system you freely invite yourself socially. Group therapy at Macy’s is a very slow financial doomed realized by , for some 30. Ben Franklin stated most men die on the inside by 27yrs of age waiting to die on the outside by 65-80 so both can be buried together. Warren Buffet states if you’re not making money while you’re sleeping you will have to work until you die. You can choose to invest time into learning daily. It’s starts with a mindset and willingness to be patient, honest, transparent about who you are and not what you do. It’s who you will come to know, not the what you or they do. That’s my rant ...gotta go.

[@kevinkemble3718]

rf4life ; “The senses are the source of misery.”

[@anubratabhattacharya5367]

Going by his definition, market economy is said by people who are too scared to say they support capitalism.

[@foreverskeptical1]

Omg yessss

[@thorrex]

Capitalism is lack of equal opportunities, market economy is not. Do you understand some of what he said now?

[@gaurangkarmakar4046]

No, they are not afraid, they openly say they are poonji-pati vyaapaari aka capitalistic business-people. Market ruled economy is just another synonym for capitalism.

[@Nikhilkumar-on8vg]

Haa haa Why don't u have the courage to say I have to be close to the ruling party of India??

[@satyamvats3969]

Do you have courage to abuse pm on his official fb post, If u have, please show us.

[@yaswanthraparti8641]

whats wrong if he is?

[@martinmadrazo1781]

How can he say that, He is the biggest Binami India has ever seen. He has thousands of crores of Black Money from the Politicians.

[@gaurangkarmakar4046]

@@martinmadrazo1781 Ah look who's here!! Catholic Joe with a new name.

[@littleintrospection1204]

Everything comes from human mind.

[@RaviSingh-fv4sh]

Mind is greedy, because it is so worry about survival.

[@gauravagrawal4564]

But he himself is a socialist and by his words he’s a capitalist. Doesn’t it make him quasi socialist or quasi capitalist? Anyway, socialism is a younger brother of communism.

[@revolutionaryape7568]

Another person from the corporate community lol

[@gauravagarwal750]

@@revolutionaryape7568 lol so I should be government tyrant like you? Apeshit. At least corporatists create values in the market unlike you guys who just know how to rant on the streets for human rights and nonsensical indoctrinating ideas. Commie dawgs are parasitic in nature.

[@revolutionaryape7568]

@@gauravagarwal750 Lmao that's a big logical fallacy out there. I am Anarcho-Syndicalist and a Libertarian Marxist. What do you mean by "values" here? Surely bootlickers from the corporate caste like you need to cope harder.

[@revolutionaryape7568]

@@gauravagarwal750Wow charlatans like you get easily triggered XD Continue to cope hard.

[@gauravagarwal750]

@@revolutionaryape7568 I get triggered? 😂 that’s why you guys pick guns and hold placard marches? Are you joking my commie friend?

[@tamal704]

What is market ... it should be Market = SUM of ( purchasing power + intention to purchase ) of all people in the market ... So 3 factors (purchasing power, intention to purchase, number of people ) determining market in lay mans term but who will be controlling these 3 parameters and who are actually controlling these parameters in the current economy ??

[@aruneshg4821]

Only sharing what you have is nowhere close to the ideology of communism, certainly he did not mention the complexity of the ideas of communism, man in such position should choose his sharing of ideas carefully, he probably got most information incorrect or half shared

[@shubhamwr]

I haven't seen such a lier. He talks about story of Mark Twain visiting communist Russia and his talk with communist Party member. How the hell is that possible when Twain died in 1910 and Russia became communist in 1917!! Just how he talked about people sharing things don't exist for them, he's telling story of a man which didn't exist at that time. Marx also allowed for possibility of communist revolution in Russia, not only in rich countries. And for that matter such revolutions did take place in rich countries to establish socialism, for example Paris commune of 1871, Spanish revolution of 1936, May 1968 events in France, not to mention people in many Latin American countries like Chile, Uruguay( which was one of richest countries at time) had elected communists and socialists but were overthrown by United States. Not to mention socialist movement was stronger in United States itself (and is becoming stronger now, around 45% of Americans now support socialism, 70% millenials say they would vote socialist) , not to mention revolution in Germany after world War 1 and so on. Also not to mention that capitalism is still there. Till there's capitalism, there will always be possibility of such system. Not to mention all rich countries are using guidelines given in communist Manifesto under head "what will be course of communist revolution? ". Marx said communist revolution will proceed with progressive taxing, public free education , abolition of child labor, separation of church from state and so on. All of these measures are carried out by rich countries. We are already moving towards communism. Also he's misinterpreting Marx in way he looks at sentence "communism will take place at richest countries". This didn't mean for Marx that rich people will start sharing with poor, as he describes, but rather that working people will expropriate rich people (because that's what they did in overthrowing Fuedalism and even slavery). He's talking about Utopian socialists, who said that rich people will surrender their companies to workers. Marx didn't agree with them "Also Marx doesn't know about human beings". That's extraordinary.ironically He can now relate human nature with political system because of Marx. Study of social relations and human beings is called as " Sociology ". And Marx was one of *founders* of this school of thought. U hear that? Forget about he not knowing human nature, he spent part of his life just to analyse this question. And with anthropological research done by others, here's what he found. People were communists before agriculture! Yes u hear that, sadguru? People were communists, it was called as " Primitive communism ". Any sane and sober psychologist know that human nature is NOT fixed. There's greedy gene in humans, so there's altruistic gene. Some studies have found that altruism and sharing is hardwired in humans. That's why u strangely feel happy when u help someone, when in fact u have lost something to other people. I'm sure everyone here has experienced that feeling. So as Peter Kropotkin put it "looking at capitalism and saying human nature is greedy is like looking at miners and saying it's human nature to cough"

[@Justme-fz1ng]

@@shubhamwr Exactly. Well put. Lal salam

[@blackjack4939]

Its all about class struggle. Rich are not going to share their profit we have to eat them.

[@Sully12]

Wdym please elaborate. What’s your solution to wealth inequality. What system is best for this?

[@alexander10122]

​@@Sully12Revolution, that's what he is talking about.

[@tristancelayeta6890]

Sociopathic darwinian detachment is the laissez-faire path to self-realization. Possession of power is too delicious to constrain and those subject to the accomplished should be detached from their fate. - It is a trip to find an Ezra Pound hidden here.

[@aagantuk7370]

Kya hag diya idhar

[@kevinkemble3718]

Tristan Celayeta ; well you certainly captured my attention.

[@CocoTube11]

Yeah. And communism and socialism was achieved without any power….right? It had nothing to do with gaining power 🙃

[@KuroKarma]

Communism means a classless, stateless and currency-less society. It is a form of socialism. Socialism implies resources should be distributed equally vs capitalism wherein resources are in the hands of the few. This idea that the poor want to steal from the rich is ridiculous. The rich loot the poor, have been doing so historically. During colonial times the British and other Europeans looted our countries and left us shattered. The rich today do not pay their taxes and constantly use their power to undermine public infrastructure. When we say rich, we are not talking about some random middle class person with a car. We are talking about the millionaires and the billionaires, hoarding their wealth and power and saying they are entitled to it. Meanwhile we have starving poor, farmers who are committing suicide, hundreds of homeless sheltering in front of houses of worship and refugees with no place to call home. How hard can they work to improve their lives? How much personal responsibility can they apply? The 1% controls about 50% of the wealth. Leaving the 99% of the population with the rest of the 50%. What can us working class people do? How many of you lost family members because of unaffordable healthcare? How many of us gave up our dreams as education was too expensive? How many got addicted to alcohol and other vices because life was too miserable? No capitalism is not ethical, it exploits the workers, the poor, and the middle class so that the rich can have their luxuries. The rich are not smarter or harder working, your mother works harder than any of the billionaires. Why is she not compensated? We are being exploited brothers and sisters. Do not fall for the lies of the rich and powerful. Wake up. It matters not what economic theory you prefer. It does not change that our system is broken and we must fix it.

[@charlietube7165]

What's the point of this long ESA

[@nabyendu16]

I certainly don't wanna live in a socialist country.

[@ni_ola_ai_oai_1667]

well said! i would not say that the system is broken tho, i would say it functions exactly the way its supposed to, we must become class conscious to observe that we cannot reform it well enough.

[@ni_ola_ai_oai_1667]

viva la revolution!

[@vulcan8288]

@@nabyendu16 yea parasites hate a stable life serving the state

[@Volvo-f2y]

Sadhguru can justify ww3 as survival of the fittest, instead of arguing for, let's say, denuclearisation. Good for his followers! 👍🏼👍🏼

[@yaswanthraparti8641]

Have you ever realized that we are at peace because of nuclear weapons?

[@barbarik3797]

@@yaswanthraparti8641 they wont cause they r consumed by idealogy which promotes victimism

[@TM-ym5wi]

Well denuclearisation, just like communism, looks beautiful on paper but is a failure in reality. Hope everyone realises the nature of reality rather than living in the la la wonderland.

[@MasterSkywalker.]

@@yaswanthraparti8641 I request elaboration

[@tamal704]

So as per Sadhguru main reason for failure of communism (in USSR) was because the communist countries was made to be ruled by rich people unlike China I guess ... Also was there any link between the rulers of USSR and the Capitalist leaders (so called top of the pyramid) ... What about India's communist party leaders .. Do they have Capitalist link?

[@nabyendu16]

Indian communist leaders prefer to sent thier kid's to capatilist west to get education.

[@Deveshi.A.]

China is on paper communists , that is not a communist country at all

[@TheKukun123]

You know the days are grim and our predecessor politicians( read socialists) have failed when a 'mystic' explains economic/political ideologies and history.

[@TheKukun123]

With that said, Jaggi Vasudev has said nothing but the truth. He has articulated it so well.

[@aagantuk7370]

...and "explains" them without much nuance.

[@abhro5424]

And what Guruji said is DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM

[@YashKansalx]

Abhro S Roy no he is talking about capitalism (free market)

[@abhro5424]

@@YashKansalx yes...Democratic socialism exists within capitalist economy. He's suggesting that only.

[@nmcoyotes9053]

Abhro S Roy no he is suggesting progressive taxation. Democratic socialism means government owns a portion of production and gives back to the people which we know has not and never will work. You can have an open market with social programs. Social programs do not equal socialsim

[@johnhuys8413]

@@abhro5424 no that's social democracy.

[@Justme-fz1ng]

@@abhro5424 That is social democracy

[@Toxicashellmonsanto]

Sadbguru always nails it. I wish we had a law, only those enlightened may govern.

[@Justme-fz1ng]

Not to insult him,but i dont think he knows what he is talking about

[@karthik-mo3kf]

@@Justme-fz1ng he knows what he is speaking about. Might be you did not understand what he is speaking about.

[@redwansarker5539]

Every political science students should watch this

[@vikrammahey5414]

Can someone define capitalism socialism and communism

[@valcodeengineers5042]

Dear Vikram Mahey! I am extremely happy to learn that you seek to know the definitions of Capitalism, Socialism and Communism. Please wait for sometime, I endeavor to offer you the scientific definitions . You may refer to my replies posted to Mr Vishal just above your post only. There you may get some idea. Now,I will give you some introduction to the definitions . (1) The Authentic Capitalism came in to existence after the Industrial revolution took place. It commenced seriously after Nineteenth Century. When various Inventions and Innovations came into existence( Bright example Respected Mr. Thomas Alva Edition) . Some Entrepreneurs ( like Henry Ford)put these inventons into practice and commercially intensified along with evolving technology. Thus the standard of living of the Human race started rising. This is the Capitalism. (2) Then Some formally learned Individuals who were educated but did not have aptitude talent and burning desire to become prosperous but they were interested in the well being of Society, promoted Democracy and became elected rulers , leaders like Abraham Lincoln. and Unfortunately Those leaders and Educated Class who were not CAPABLE & DESIROUS of being reach, formed the Government and evolved the Constitutions and evolved Taxation policies. Now they had had to get revenue and they started taxing Industrialists as others had no capacity to earn enough taxable income. So these Elected Rulers propounded that to help poor, in name of public welfare and social justice they started taxing heavily , for that they had to restrict, control and violet the RIGHT TO PROPERTY of Industrialists. .... NOW THE SOCIALISM came into existence. (3) Now Some Leaders & Intellectuals were not satisfied with taxing and controlling Industrialists so with BRUT FORCE AND VIOLENCE THEY TOOK COMPLETE CONTROL ON THE ECONOMY..... NOW THE COMMUNISM came into existence. COMMUNISM existed in the country like USSR (Russia ), China. But since in Communism there is no incentive for work NO COMMUNIST COUNTRY ON EARTH PROSPERED and Russia and other small countries renounced communism and China has relaxed Communism and adopted lenient market approach. So, Through Capitalism countries like US, JAPAN and other European countries prospered, through Socialism countries like India is struggling. And Communism is the system of mass slavery. I will be glad to volunteer further information in future. Regards Jay Hind. Humbly yours, Arun Jani.

[@Cheiko18]

@N R except it was an individual who did it and was not mandated by a bunch of poor ineffective weak minded people. Basically a free marketeer created a corporate working on a socialist principal. That's what India should be, a free market economy with strong religious or cultural values with focus on spiritual fulfilment.

[@theguywhotrolledyou]

Capitalism = when everyone have the right and chance to be Rich Socialism = when everyone has to be an extreme nationalist Communism = when everyone is equally poor

[@theguywhotrolledyou]

@N R typical triggered leftist moron....😂😂

[@vigneshgj2095]

without free market 3 of them is same

[@ya.bel.7531]

Sadhguru don't confuse original communism and bolchevism and somehow your criticism of the cast system lead you to a form of socialism while your silence on the desaster of capitalism makes me wonder.

[@nabyendu16]

Don't confuse people with different communism... they are all same a failed Idea

[@ya.bel.7531]

@@nabyendu16 have you really read Marx? If no than you should Sir.

[@arkag5096]

@@ya.bel.7531 Marx's communism is a very good idea but it's impractical

[@Justme-fz1ng]

@@arkag5096 Then u do not know what marx has written. With all due respect

[@andipower8163]

Maybe this is correct for the welfare of humans. But doesn't capitalism exploit nature? According to Sadhgurum, if I have a thriving business and make millions of dollars, it is totally fine if i then share 95% of my earnings with the rest of society. But what if my business was selling cellphones? Isn't mother earth exploited for all that plastic, lithium, energy and transportation (co2) that is required for producing the phones? Only moderation can help here, I think.

[@umeshsonune7018]

Wrong thing happens at first but exploitation can be done in good matter. We are on the wat that.

[@pradyumnabanerjee3333]

Define exploitation. And if he shared all that wealth all it will do is increase inflation and we are back go square 1 with no increase in purchasing power.

[@staycalmonelove]

​@@pradyumnabanerjee3333 this is exactly why workers should own means of production

[@pradyumnabanerjee3333]

@@staycalmonelove No. Private property is a good thing. Solves thr tragedy of the commons (which is the source of nearly every environmental negative externality)

[@thorrex]

He has spoken on exploration of our planet many times and suggested the easiest possible solution too.

[@aniruddhaani5098]

But one thing I observed is which country ruled by communist there always be a dictator ship I don't know why , I am not saying democracy is might not produce dictator ship.

[@yaswanthraparti8641]

because they have one party and one leader system.

[@prakashtiwari8003]

True, Communism always drive the country towards dictatorship.

[@shivamedits7682]

When u don't have the courage to be a businessman like Ramdev, u become sadhguru

[@sarthaksharma2225]

And so when you don't have enough knowledge as well as courage to get on a public platform, you comment crap on youtube

[@shivamedits7682]

@@sarthaksharma2225 using technology what it meant for. Comment section available h to comment hi krunga. Ab kya dharna karu Jake? Ajjeeb gawaar h

[@sarthaksharma2225]

@@shivamedits7682 i said ,u dont have enough " knowledge and courage", u don't hold 2% knowledge as that of sadhguru( which is visible from your comments) ,so you just comment any crap about him! Yeh, technology ka sahi istmal nahi hai ,kahi sei? Aur unhe ramdev banae kei koi zarrorat nahi hai

[@shivamedits7682]

Sadhguru is nothing more than a opportunist and propagandist. I can't be supporting pure capitalism like he does. So whatever u say, I always find him talking illogical things.

[@sarthaksharma2225]

@@shivamedits7682 Everyone is entitled of their own opinion,so I don't wanna argue. For me,i like his take on inner engineering ,spirituality and religion ,so i follow him for these topics only.

[@srinivasansridharan]

2:58 ❤❤❤❤❤

[@kiritibhattacharya2772]

You have not read Marx or Adam Smith. Marx did not write any of this. Disappointed.

[@pradyumnabanerjee3333]

Use ur brain for atleast once in ur life commie

[@adityakiran4677]

@@pradyumnabanerjee3333 read a book atleast once in your life cappy

[@pradyumnabanerjee3333]

@@adityakiran4677 Did long before you took refuge in marx and his self-contradictory works just to feel good about being a "muh proletariat"

[@Justme-fz1ng]

@@pradyumnabanerjee3333 History?Socialism had given the world the highest standard of living. Free ,housing and healthcare in cuba and ussr. The ussr became a superpower rivalling the US in only 20 yrs. This was after the country was destroyed after 2 revolutions and a civil war. Cuba makes medical and scientific inovation after inovation despite being a blockaded island under imperialism by a larger power for nearly 60 years. Some of the things cuba does,the US cannot do itself. High quality and free healthcare. www.chicagobooth.edu/~/media/cafa342c2e65452085e510ab3d4f0f15.pdf Free schooling www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/archive/PubEdUSSR.htm Human rights in cuba www.counterpunch.org/2017/10/06/cuba-human-rights-and-self-determination/ Human rights in the ussr ia800300.us.archive.org/6/items/HumanRightsInTheSovietUnion/Human%20Rights%20in%20the%20Soviet%20Union.pdf A cia report stating that on average the people of the USSR had a higher caloric intake than the people of the US www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000498133.pdf Economy of Cuba, a CIA report. www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/cu.html

[@martinmadrazo1781]

@@Justme-fz1ng ur replies doesn't make any sense to those cappies. In particular, Indian cappies are a mad flock driven by our Private Minister Modi ji.

[@jhebronrai]

I disagree. Communism is pragmatically a bad idea, though theoretically it seems good.

[@stateofmyned]

Jonathan Hebron Rai yes it eventually makes the evolved humans as crippled

[@nabyendu16]

Start living in Cuba then

[@Salama-o9u]

​@@stateofmynedYeah

[@Telugustories412]

The definition of poor according to sadhguru ?

[@madhusmitasharma601]

True true true....Socialism is a Watered down version of communist...😹🙏 Atleast I have been seeing this from last 10-12 months Ppl actually lack courage if given power just look at them and their attitude...Everything will be Crystal clear.... Someone has rightly said don’t judge ppl when they lack power and money...Judge them when they have Power and money... Cos Gareebi ka naam Gandhi...Atleast my recent experience says that about lot of ppl... Note; CHALO DOBARA LIKE KARO dekhe toh sahi kitno mein dum hai 😜

[@soyambhughatak4296]

Yes and I hope TMC will overthrown CPIM from Kerala also this type of nonsense words came because corrupted mind you have You ever thought how good was education under Communism in West Bengal

[@darbyshujo5045]

socialism is not a watered down version of communism rather communism is late stage socialism you cant achieve communism without doing socialism first its impossible to do so

[@darbyshujo5045]

@@soyambhughatak4296 the marxist party that rules kerala is not even doing that much socialism , because guess what the people dont own the means of production and all socialist countries that we have so far take for example cuba or the ussr have universal education and universal healthcare which is not present in kerala, i dont know the reasons why the communist party arent doing more as im new to the political climate of kerala, but currently kerala has the highest standards of living compared to every other state maybe because the socialist party cares a bit for the workers compared to the neoliberal and fascist parties

[@srinivasanrajadurai920]

Sadhguru capitalism supporter.

[@shubhamwr]

Really? I haven't seen such a lier. He talks about story of Mark Twain visiting communist Russia and his talk with communist Party member. How the hell is that possible when Twain died in 1910 and Russia became communist in 1917!! Just how he talked about people sharing things don't exist for them, he's telling story of a man which didn't exist at that time. Marx also allowed for possibility of communist revolution in Russia, not only in rich countries. And for that matter such revolutions did take place in rich countries to establish socialism, for example Paris commune of 1871, Spanish revolution of 1936, May 1968 events in France, not to mention people in many Latin American countries like Chile, Uruguay( which was one of richest countries at time) had elected communists and socialists but were overthrown by United States. Not to mention socialist movement was stronger in United States itself (and is becoming stronger now, around 45% of Americans now support socialism, 70% millenials say they would vote socialist) , not to mention revolution in Germany after world War 1 and so on. Also not to mention that capitalism is still there. Till there's capitalism, there will always be possibility of such system. Not to mention all rich countries are using guidelines given in communist Manifesto under head "what will be course of communist revolution? ". Marx said communist revolution will proceed with progressive taxing, public free education , abolition of child labor, separation of church from state and so on. All of these measures are carried out by rich countries. We are already moving towards communism. Also he's misinterpreting Marx in way he looks at sentence "communism will take place at richest countries". This didn't mean for Marx that rich people will start sharing with poor, as he describes, but rather that working people will expropriate rich people (because that's what they did in overthrowing Fuedalism and even slavery). He's talking about Utopian socialists, who said that rich people will surrender their companies to workers. Marx didn't agree with them "Also Marx doesn't know about human beings". That's extraordinary.ironically He can now relate human nature with political system because of Marx. Study of social relations and human beings is called as " Sociology ". And Marx was one of *founders* of this school of thought. U hear that? Forget about he not knowing human nature, he spent part of his life just to analyse this question. And with anthropological research done by others, here's what he found. People were communists before agriculture! Yes u hear that, sadguru? People were communists, it was called as " Primitive communism ". Any sane and sober psychologist know that human nature is NOT fixed. There's greedy gene in humans, so there's altruistic gene. Some studies have found that altruism and sharing is hardwired in humans. That's why u strangely feel happy when u help someone, when in fact u have lost something to other people. I'm sure everyone here has experienced that feeling. So as Peter Kropotkin put it "looking at capitalism and saying human nature is greedy is like looking at miners and saying it's human nature to cough"

[@shubhamwr]

Expose him

[@kevinkemble3718]

Srinivasan Rajadurai ; look into intangible capitalist. Without capital or a shoestring budget. Start Small. Start Now people.

[@justamoteofdust]

No surprise there at all.

[@jensfrisch8659]

Communists are materialists as well - just worse!

[@shrikantiahtdr8022]

"Consciousness is the subjective image of the objective world" - Karl Marx For fucks sake..all the so called "experts"..read a lil abt the basics of the ideolgy. Today communism is perhaps the most stereotyped subject in thie world.All thnx to US and ofc..us fools who blindly followed XD.

[@ni_ola_ai_oai_1667]

i agree. they pretend to be anti-communist, whilst not knowing what their actually against

[@hemanthkumar2566]

U r good speech guru

[@laxminarayanav.n5116]

This gentleman Jaggi Vasudev, alias Sadguru simply parrots what Gandhiji once said about communism, generally, to mean 'Communism is good. If people accept it voluntarily it is welcome. But if it is imposed, Gandhiji will be the first man to oppose it'. The second idea of allowing the capitalists to make huge profits and taxing them to share the residual wealth among the poor is a crude version of the Trickle Down theory of economics. Any body who has a cursory knowledge of commodity, value, surplus value, dead labour and living labour - at least a superficial reading of 'The Capital' by Karl Marx would pity the colossal ignorance and stupidity of this gentleman.

[@KuroKarma]

I agree he is parroting neo-liberal talking points

[@Justme-fz1ng]

Exactly

[@pipersolanas3322]

What a beautiful comment. Thank you.

[@agentravi00007]

First you have to convince the richest person who is going to share wealth. richers don't agree to share their wealth.

[@kevinkemble3718]

Ankit Rao ; Consider this ..... “"Laissez Faire" is French for "leave alone" which means that the government leaves the people alone regarding all economic activities. It is the separation of economy and state. There are two ways that a government typically is tempted to interfere with the economy. The first is through the initiation of force, and the second is through socialized industries. Neither of these activities are aligned with the proper role of government, and are both unacceptable. "Laissez Faire Capitalism" is actually redundant, due to the nature of Capitalism. Therefore, simply "Capitalism" is sufficient to get the point across although historically it has been misrepresented as compatible with government economic interference.” ...............My experience observes entrepreneurs do best in an atmosphere of reserved Capitalism for those who have a venture or enterprise and take all this risk to succeed or fail. Responsibility rest on the entrepreneur and positive vision plan of action without government interference. In the United States of America the constitution clearly states “We The People” not we the 3 branches of government. Government is to slave for its people not the other way around. “We The People” are to be treated like Kings, Queens, Prince, Princesses who are “In God We Trust.” “Land of The Free.” The People take personal accountability deciding if one is to be poor, rich or indifferent. Not “we the government.” Government is to follow the people’s wishes. Period that’s it. “Wealth” is having control of time & money, forwarding personal resources earned to support whomever they please. The saying a quitter never succeeds comes to mind. These are the most phenomenal times to be alive to share knowledge. Words create everything not what one thinks. Replace thoughts with words, not by thoughts. Be Well, in these unstable uncertain times. ....Kinda done with this KZbin post. It’s pretty much clearly described by Sadhguru spelling it out. There is no press on me. I’m just a global citizen striving, winning in a state of mind. The next months in 2020 get after it. #grit

[@Justme-fz1ng]

Socialism is the worker ownership of the means of production. Not people sharing wealth

[@Justme-fz1ng]

@@kevinkemble3718 Socialism is the worker ownership of the means of production. Not the state. So idk why u typed all that down....

[@saksham6174]

And they shouldnt share their wealth. The richests prolly did work and applied their own brains for earning that wealth! They can't just share it with a bunch of random poor people who don't know shot what to do.

[@mylesjeffers6148]

Hole in the guru's wisdom.

[@Justme-fz1ng]

Exactly. Lal salam

[@prarthanakhot331]

Where has this man come from? 😭😭😭

[@prarthanakhot331]

@Kalvakuntla Akhilrao Hahahaha

[@prarthanakhot331]

@Kalvakuntla Akhilrao Please go deep

[@prarthanakhot331]

@Kalvakuntla Akhilrao Respect the efforts someone is putting to touch lives. :) All the best

[@harambhaiallahmemes9826]

💩Toilets

[@memberofthetribe7616]

a second hand and a second, unoccupied house are a very far, far distance from one another. But you are meant to manufacture consent in capitalisms middle classes, this is why you've been permitted to reach such hoards of fame & fiat currency.

[@juliasmith5267]

Truly nice! Sadhguru is really beautiful. 💚💜 With my spiritual path I've also loved watching lots of Master Sri Avinash lately. #SriAvinashDoTV 💗 I find Sri Avinash's Satsang talks really heartwarming.

[@rossdsilva5235]

Julia Smith check out Rupert Spira

[@Justme-fz1ng]

He really does not know anything about marxism

[@kelkeshkirikiri4201]

@@Justme-fz1ng Fuck Off Kiddo

[@Justme-fz1ng]

@@kelkeshkirikiri4201 Its the truth,kid. Just because someone uses big words,does not mean he is right.

[@kelkeshkirikiri4201]

@@Justme-fz1ng And just because you don't know anything, simply concluding something you don't even know about is a different level of stupidity.

[@aruncheekolu]

This is what sadhguru claims....In my college days I was deeply involved in the Communist movement. Even now I'm very Communist because Communism is about equality.

[@SkillslliK]

Commies really need to use their brain at least once in their life to seriously think what they opt for is nothing but pure human destruction and corruption. GO HAVE A LOOK AT CHINA, RUSSIA and VENEZUELA. I've come across a bunch of idiots but communists are a league above them, they're retarded and have narrow vision of work culture.

[@alrizo1115]

@@SkillslliK China is having a leap that USA is afraid that it can surpass them. Trade war is already happening between these to giants. It's a matter of time which country will make it. Whoever emerges will dictate the ideology of the world once again.

[@SkillslliK]

@@alrizo1115 I think you've to have a good weed to talk such crap without even knowing what's going on.

[@alrizo1115]

@@SkillslliK if I am talking crap, why powerful countries struggling that they can't get cheap manpower from China? I'm not taking sides, it's just major moves from US or China will determine the world's future. Get your remaining braincells together.

[@phantomblaster8462]

AL Rizo well in case you did not notice, communist countries kill freedoms.

[@tamal704]

So by Sadhguru - Only poor wants to share but rich will never share and never allow poor to get richer ... they want poor to remain slaves and their closer ones their slave and slavers for others

[@Upwangupta782]

This is why some humans have a dream to wipe out all the rich people

[@Thememesmaker0]

Sir with all respect.not a correct interpretatation.u.r talking about communism as fundamental interpretatiom.communism.is a way of life and with larger visiom we struggle. Lal salam..!

[@pratikghosh3499]

Communism is shit 💩

[@shubhamwr]

@MATHA NOSHTO-MAN government doesn't take all things in communism. Rather government doesn't even exist in communism

[@sudhanshusrivastava1969]

bro one example of real communist country is cuba go and check what pathetic condition they are in

[@Justme-fz1ng]

Lal salam

[@Justme-fz1ng]

@MATHA NOSHTO-MAN Such a dumb joke.🤦‍♂️

[@RamAkash]

Sharing and communism? How are they even related? It's all about the state.

[@aagantuk7370]

That's fake news bro

[@aerion4077]

"personal property and private property? theyre the same, everyone is greedy. muh human nature. this message is approved by the interests of Private Property (tm)"

[@aagantuk7370]

@@aerion4077 200 years of theory d'estryoed by an inexperienced, spoiled Indian guy who's always had things go his way

[@aerion4077]

old man in an influential position argues in favor of the status quo? that never happens.

[@parthshukla545]

Why are people so afraid to TAX or have some control on business, man and his wealth. We all can agree upon creating checks and balances when it comes to army, governments, or bureaucracy. Same checks and bances should be applied to businessmen, as well hence market economy alone is not that good.

[@aadityaanand2339]

❤

[@subbaraopindiproli6711]

👌👌👌👌

[@bitcoin7231]

And distribution is process is corrupted just blockchain may work But corruption is worst Everything should be taken by government but leaders should be patriots and married

[@brunodrweski3689]

his vision of communism is caricatural and takes as true all what anticommunists have said, real or false. In fact, he should look why people in former socialist countries do prefer now the former regime they had to the one they have, and why Chinese are two times richer than Indians when both countries began in the same burden. A why India was in a better situation than Pakistan which was more capitalist than Congress India. Now India is experimenting with Modi, what Pakistan had and Pakistan with Imran Khan begins to look the Chinese way : kzbin.info/www/bejne/iWiXmnV6YrqWmM0

[@alexmoothedathu3542]

No your wrong China chose a capitalism model after the death of mao ze dong look it up if u don’t believe me watch the video from Johnny haris on why became so powerful

[@RajpreetMatharu1993]

hein? not wanting to sacrifice a hand doesn't mean you only want to give what you don't have.. it simply means that having two hands is more important than having two houses or having two carriages (which are both useless).. i love sadhguru but i thought that story was really dumb

[@PrashantSingh-rr5iu]

He said hen and not hand... listen again

[@Monsto99]

This person is a bloody hypocrite, at first place he does save soil movement and then also supports capitalism, which is directly or indirectly responsible for the harm to the environment. atleast he could have been moderate , but he gave his whole support to capitalism

[@grid9124]

He can be a motivational speaker instead of faking world in swamiji attire! Best part is, people fell for it!

[@karbhatia501]

Hinduism or Sanatanism only the most ideal practice

[@charlietube7165]

Buddhism also from India

[@karbhatia501]

@@charlietube7165 it is also a part of Sanatan Dharma! Not only part it is a type of Sanatan Dharma!

[@bitcoin7231]

Then what about capitalists they are not giving if USSR people have only hen and developed nations are not giving any thing what is that then

[@piccadelly9360]

"Greed is good" "Sharing" is better. India one should know about capitalism. You have had a very difficult history with capitalism and English people. Capitalism is good Communism is good The requirement for both of these is that one does not sell his soul. If humanity persists, everything is OK For a communism as described by Karl Marx and Friderich Engels, a very important prerequisite must be felt. The people are provided for and don't have to work to feed themselves. In other words "rich" These people would work voluntarily out of boredom, but not anything. Something special that gives them fun. By creating certain things, life is enriched and one feels felt. Capitalism is good but not in its current form. To explain this better, let's take a look at nature. A forest is an ecosystem in which planets and animals live in equilibrium. That means everything that lives in this ecosystem shares with others that everyone can live well. Our capitalism is not like that. On the contrary, it is based on individualism. The 2-3 percent of the population hoards all the money, the others have to work very hard for it, and many can only survive and not live discreetly. And money is like water. It always has to run in circles if that is not the case, then capitalism breaks off. Because capitalism is based on consumption. Consumption is interrupted and the cycle can not have been longer close, the collapse begins

[@olduncow4273]

Fuck communism

[@MasterCrow591]

@@olduncow4273 fuck Individualistic Market Economy

[@user-wp8yx]

Oh I get it! This is a joke. And here I was going to write this long thing correcting him.

[@snehangshubhattacharjee8072]

It's just 8 minutes and 41 seconds of pure bullshit.

[@zahidulislamnahid]

You know nothing about communism

[@justabir4182]

You know nothing about reality.

[@hardikdubey4199]

So what do you know about communism then?

[@nandu9773]

Zakir Nayak knows everything

[@sherlock766]

Fact: No one cares about your stupid opinion.

[@shubhamwr]

Really? I haven't seen such a lier. He talks about story of Mark Twain visiting communist Russia and his talk with communist Party member. How the hell is that possible when Twain died in 1910 and Russia became communist in 1917!! Just how he talked about people sharing things don't exist for them, he's telling story of a man which didn't exist at that time. Marx also allowed for possibility of communist revolution in Russia, not only in rich countries. And for that matter such revolutions did take place in rich countries to establish socialism, for example Paris commune of 1871, Spanish revolution of 1936, May 1968 events in France, not to mention people in many Latin American countries like Chile, Uruguay( which was one of richest countries at time) had elected communists and socialists but were overthrown by United States. Not to mention socialist movement was stronger in United States itself (and is becoming stronger now, around 45% of Americans now support socialism, 70% millenials say they would vote socialist) , not to mention revolution in Germany after world War 1 and so on. Also not to mention that capitalism is still there. Till there's capitalism, there will always be possibility of such system. Not to mention all rich countries are using guidelines given in communist Manifesto under head "what will be course of communist revolution? ". Marx said communist revolution will proceed with progressive taxing, public free education , abolition of child labor, separation of church from state and so on. All of these measures are carried out by rich countries. We are already moving towards communism. Also he's misinterpreting Marx in way he looks at sentence "communism will take place at richest countries". This didn't mean for Marx that rich people will start sharing with poor, as he describes, but rather that working people will expropriate rich people (because that's what they did in overthrowing Fuedalism and even slavery). He's talking about Utopian socialists, who said that rich people will surrender their companies to workers. Marx didn't agree with them "Also Marx doesn't know about human beings". That's extraordinary.ironically He can now relate human nature with political system because of Marx. Study of social relations and human beings is called as " Sociology ". And Marx was one of *founders* of this school of thought. U hear that? Forget about he not knowing human nature, he spent part of his life just to analyse this question. And with anthropological research done by others, here's what he found. People were communists before agriculture! Yes u hear that, sadguru? People were communists, it was called as " Primitive communism ". Any sane and sober psychologist know that human nature is NOT fixed. There's greedy gene in humans, so there's altruistic gene. Some studies have found that altruism and sharing is hardwired in humans. That's why u strangely feel happy when u help someone, when in fact u have lost something to other people. I'm sure everyone here has experienced that feeling. So as Peter Kropotkin put it "looking at capitalism and saying human nature is greedy is like looking at miners and saying it's human nature to cough"

[@anuraglamichhane1733]

Well I appreciate his audacity to teach what he doesn't understand at all. If you don't understand something, at least done spread the ignorance.

[@nathanthing8789]

oe fucche taile k buzhe chas

[@anuraglamichhane1733]

@@nathanthing8789 for those watching the comment This is Nepali for "what have you understood little kid" Well you don't know what I know or not but Jaggi has made it clear that he doesn't. My criticism is based on what he's said and not out of whim.

[@nathanthing8789]

@@anuraglamichhane1733 hmmm o well, i asked what have you understood? but u just translated my question, lol

[@JohnSmith-kj2od]

@@nathanthing8789 why do you assume he hasn't understood, why does it leave a bad taste in your mouth if he criticizes the preacher? I sense a bais

[@JohnSmith-kj2od]

@@nathanthing8789 I am biased, why do you refer to him as "kid", because kids generally don't know things, implying he doesn't know what he's talking about? Why else would you call someone "kid"

[@ahmedfarazpalijo1346]

Sadghuru may know alot about humanity but similarly he has know idea how about economics.

[@browngirlinaclownworld2077]

Millions didn't die under Stalin because of 'sharing'. They died because Stalin cared more about making his country modern and industrialized than equal. Same with Mao Tse-Tung. Their modernization pushes were the cause of the millions dead. Non-communists have done similar things. Communism doesn't work very well, but it doesn't inherently lead to millions dead either. Tito of Yugoslavia didn't kill millions. In fact, he's looked back upon with genuine affection by many Serbs for various reasons.

[@mountolympus1098]

and that is why it got broken into 7 parts?

[@GB-ty2uc]

😂

[@Cheiko18]

Another emotional narcissistic fool.

[@rdx6326]

@@Cheiko18 u mean national socialist party

[@rdx6326]

Communism is evil.. it killed millions of people and made another millons into slaves.... do ban that ideology who share the ideas of 19 century... which never ugraded after the second world war..

[@kumar-jatin-2000]

Fraud propagandist baba. Classic strawman argument.

[@Justme-fz1ng]

Exactly. Lal salam

[@whythelongface64]

Keep fighting comrades.

[@whythelongface64]

This guy is seriously full of shit and should stay put in his specialization rather than spouting non-sense

[@Justme-fz1ng]

@@whythelongface64 Thanks lal salam

[@whythelongface64]

@@Justme-fz1ng Lal salam. Which state are you from my friend?

[@coolaffection9701]

Thank you for guiding to the right direction

[@suchitraraghavan1330]

Kerala

[@ameygade1977]

Free market economy is as good as free exploitation ecoy

[@jeanniemaycrawford4466]

Hence why we need checks and balances

[@bhaginderghuman841]

U also have very little knowledge about communism !!

[@rocknikhiljai]

Indian reservation system is like this

[@Volvo-f2y]

Yeah, the EWS quota for the brahmins.

[@adityashukla2635]

@@Volvo-f2y Or 25% for Obc.. Reservation should be removed

[@janakdhamala5040]

firstly get some knowledge about socialism and communism

[@George-zl6rj]

Exactly; he won't even have the capacity to read/ understand the complex economic models in das kapital

[@justamoteofdust]

@@George-zl6rj iska baap ka baap bhi aa jaye na toh woh bhi nhi smjh paaye Das Kapital 😂😂 Ye chutiye dhongi saadhu sale sab k sab chaat rhe hai is desh ko dimak ki tarah andar se...

[@nabyendu16]

We have seen USSR fall so i think people have plenty of knowledge

[@justamoteofdust]

@@nabyendu16 but did you try to know why it fell?! Did you know if it was not for USSR we'd all be killing Jews and worshiping our lord Hitler?! Did you try to acknowledge the incredible economical progress USSR made?! And about other countries/states, did you see Kerala rise?! Did you see Cuba still doing far better on HDI than other developed countries even after being heavily suppressed by USA embargos for decades? Did you see Vietnam rise against all odds no matter how much it was smothered by USA? Need I go on?!! Stop listening to other people’s opinions on what something is and try to know the thing yourself! And this goes for anything. Ask yourself why personalities like Bhagat Singh, Einstein, Helen Keller, Bertrand Russell, Picasso, George Orwell, etc. were staunch promoters of communism and socialism!

[@nishantky7378]

@@justamoteofdust Keralas rise ? 🤣🤣 You're saying they're communists economically ? Wealth is equally distributed in kerala ? How many industries are there in kerala ? How many universities... How many jobs ? Why are people moving out of kerala to Saudi ? I want someone to be a perfect communist state or country so people understand what it really does.

[@gandalftheblack5064]

Is there anything Sadhguru doesn't know about

[@MrTed-xi2iz]

Yeah, he doesn't know how communism and socialism work, lol

[@Arya_hihi]

@@MrTed-xi2iz He clearly has 0 idea on this topic (&, he is not very smart as he portrays to be)

[@malgearjun]

I'm talking shit but in English, in India that is business model 🤣

[@naeemf6019]

💯

[@myloveindia843]

Socialism, commumism is a shitty idea in theory and a stupid idea in practice..#FREEMARKET ECONOMICS

[@johnsalchichon3605]

marx didnt know shit about economy, did you know that he never worked in his life hahahah

[@Shubhu395]

Woooooow communism destroyed

[@roberthoffenheim7861]

This fake guru doesn't really understand the difference between private property and personal property

[@tannayatarana6919]

Thank god you are not at all important..just a man behind the computer screen..pls never ever become a man whose views will be given any importance in the society...

[@roberthoffenheim7861]

@@tannayatarana6919 if you take advice from this idiot seriously, you need to get your head checked.

[@tannayatarana6919]

@@roberthoffenheim7861 but if I take this advice from you, I will have to meet an exorcist to cure me, very very soon ...no but thanks for advice...

[@bitcoin7231]

Indian culture is communistic but today gold diggers what che gueavera can't achieve sadguru achieved if didn't get just dig some history about India it's heaven by itself until these Greeks Islam and other invaded India

[@highflyingbirdz]

So he knows more about Economics than Marx?I better leave this planet.

[@shubhamwr]

Really? I haven't seen such a lier. He talks about story of Mark Twain visiting communist Russia and his talk with communist Party member. How the hell is that possible when Twain died in 1910 and Russia became communist in 1917!! Just how he talked about people sharing things don't exist for them, he's telling story of a man which didn't exist at that time. Marx also allowed for possibility of communist revolution in Russia, not only in rich countries. And for that matter such revolutions did take place in rich countries to establish socialism, for example Paris commune of 1871, Spanish revolution of 1936, May 1968 events in France, not to mention people in many Latin American countries like Chile, Uruguay( which was one of richest countries at time) had elected communists and socialists but were overthrown by United States. Not to mention socialist movement was stronger in United States itself (and is becoming stronger now, around 45% of Americans now support socialism, 70% millenials say they would vote socialist) , not to mention revolution in Germany after world War 1 and so on. Also not to mention that capitalism is still there. Till there's capitalism, there will always be possibility of such system. Not to mention all rich countries are using guidelines given in communist Manifesto under head "what will be course of communist revolution? ". Marx said communist revolution will proceed with progressive taxing, public free education , abolition of child labor, separation of church from state and so on. All of these measures are carried out by rich countries. We are already moving towards communism. Also he's misinterpreting Marx in way he looks at sentence "communism will take place at richest countries". This didn't mean for Marx that rich people will start sharing with poor, as he describes, but rather that working people will expropriate rich people (because that's what they did in overthrowing Fuedalism and even slavery). He's talking about Utopian socialists, who said that rich people will surrender their companies to workers. Marx didn't agree with them "Also Marx doesn't know about human beings". That's extraordinary.ironically He can now relate human nature with political system because of Marx. Study of social relations and human beings is called as " Sociology ". And Marx was one of *founders* of this school of thought. U hear that? Forget about he not knowing human nature, he spent part of his life just to analyse this question. And with anthropological research done by others, here's what he found. People were communists before agriculture! Yes u hear that, sadguru? People were communists, it was called as " Primitive communism ". Any sane and sober psychologist know that human nature is NOT fixed. There's greedy gene in humans, so there's altruistic gene. Some studies have found that altruism and sharing is hardwired in humans. That's why u strangely feel happy when u help someone, when in fact u have lost something to other people. I'm sure everyone here has experienced that feeling. So as Peter Kropotkin put it "looking at capitalism and saying human nature is greedy is like looking at miners and saying it's human nature to cough"

[@shubhamwr]

Expose his lies

[@rdx6326]

@@shubhamwr he is a simply telling an example u idiot....

[@shubhamwr]

@@rdx6326 frustated andh bhakt on way.His 'example' itself is a lie. It wasn't example,it was claim.Read my comment wise man!

[@rdx6326]

@@shubhamwr this is what communis did in 19 century giving tag as revistionist who have difference of opinion putting them in concentration camps........

[@lakshminarayana8024]

Babaisam

[@manishkundapur5280]

vīnash_kale veeparit_buddhi 😂

[@shashidharputtamaligaiah6920]

I have heard many of your speeches on so many subjects and issues Sadguruji. This is one speech of yours which I differ from you. So let rich people take up communism and make this a better world who is stopping them from doing it. Karl Marx has not stopped them. Communism is neither poor people's nor rich people's property it is a dream for the man kind. Poor take it up because they cannot afford even education in this money mongering world. Let the richest aristocrats, beurocrats, politicians take it up. Put more teachers, provide good infrastructure for govt schools. Provide jobs to unemployed worthy of their ability and qualifications. Let all the governments do at least this instead of judging the youth as incapable of doing anything, unemployable, etc. Good facilities for all the governments enterprise, establishments and hospitals. Let at least governments hold or stop the richest in knowledge from going to abroad for better opportunities. What is the liability and responsibility of a governing body towards society (people whether rich or poor) if it only focused on tax collection, fine collection, profit making (revenue) and do only little for its people as service.

[@saughall1]

I thought Sadhguru would of been wiser than this.

[@echooscar5241]

This is a biased and unfair example of communism. It is out of the surplus distribution is made, sadguru jis example is about taking sometime from nothing creating a negative value which is what British tried to do in India and what they succeeded with in Africa.

[@TheJaganmohanc]

He is right people want give they don't have similarly he has no knowledge that he is sharing with us

[@Justme-fz1ng]

Hahahah

[@technicalwork7663]

his knowledge about communism meaningless

[@sankalpthakur2503]

what is bro yappin about

[@vrock1457]

Wow. Sadhguru doesn't know about anything and is wrong about everything. Well, what do you expect from someone who thinks that if boy-girl twins are born than left and right side of the mother's breast will have different types of milk. You can't tax the rich if the rich can corrupt the government with their money. He also doesn't know what capital is. Capital is means of production not money. If someone owns capital in a country, then that's not communism or socialism. It's capitalist country. Don't call it socialist or communist. The thing about greed is that our capitalist system rewards greed. Humans are not naturally greedy. They do greedy shit to survive and or get money and power. Humans are naturally cooperative beings. We are not even talking about climate change. Capitalism caused it and capitalism has no way out of it. Let's just die by producing profits for someone else who is making the world you live in worse. Do you think they will share when there is nothing to share. They will let us all die outside their high walls of safety or keep us as slaves to do thier bidding. Global warming and climate change can only be stopped by communism and we don't even have 15 years to stop it.

[@ni_ola_ai_oai_1667]

YASS

[@alexmoothedathu3542]

Can you give me an example of where communism has worked

[@oxenMenace]

Im going to be frank with this, I really respect Sadhguru; however this just doesn't sit well with me. It's clear that he didnt study marx extensively, because I would say that on a secular and sociological level Marx understood people better than anyone. None of what Sadhguru says about Marx is true either. Marx didnt argue for people to give away personal property, and he distinguished private and personal property quite clearly. I highly recommend actually reading Karl Marx. In some areas of life, a Yogi will not always have an answer. Or at least, not a correct one

[@jeanniemaycrawford4466]

Oh, really? What happened to the USSR and pre Hitler Germany? Tell me one country that communism has worked?

[@jeanniemaycrawford4466]

Yea but he also said that the worker was entitled to the owners goods when they incur 0 risk in the transaction. Marx wanted to create an oppressed class of entrepreneurs who started a business then everything he worked on was seized and redistributed by the state.

[@oxenMenace]

@@jeanniemaycrawford4466 The state? Marx said nothing about the State. You’re thinking of Lenin. Marx was more of an anarchist, and also he was advocating for freedom, not equality

[@oxenMenace]

@@jeanniemaycrawford4466 The USSR?? See this is what I mean, Russia was never a communist state; hell they weren’t even socialist. They where state-capitalist

[@jeanniemaycrawford4466]

@@oxenMenace the ussr is the only country where communism was conducted at a large enough scale. If even the USSR is capitalism (according to you) then I guess communism is an unachievable concept You are really misinformed on Marx, he's the farthest thing from an anarchist.

[@samyuktabhandari8101]

If karl marx was about equality, why was he so racist towards black people in his letters to egnes?

[@BeastMastah69]

FRAUD GURU

[@anuraglamichhane1733]

Pretending to know communism coming from a guy who says, "If we say we don't know, possibility of knowing arises". I fail to understand why his followers fail to see his hypocrisy. I wish it stopped there, but he pretends to know things NOBODY knows like how some alignment of moon and earth affects our diet, how women can't enter some temple because her menstruation cycle is entangled in a quantum state with the planetary motion with the frequency of the temple 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@anuraglamichhane1733]

@@jishnu9551 Well said. But indian PM is more right__traditionalist and almost fascist_than just Ronald Regan and Margret Thatcher style neo-liberals. So is this Numbnut Jaggi. He uses this spiritualism as a cover for the pre-enlightenment era religious hierarchical views, so that is harder for the rationalists to attack him.

[@ni_ola_ai_oai_1667]

@@anuraglamichhane1733 can u tell me more? i had no idea this is happening

[@anuraglamichhane1733]

@@ni_ola_ai_oai_1667 Tell more of what?

[@RaviSingh-fv4sh]

Sadhguru is living by greed.

[@praveenp2873]

He is saying true.. Study about venezuela.. 😂Socialism is just like drug feels good for a while

[@bhanubhaktasharma6686]

It can not be talk on communism socialism.

[@perplexed843]

LMFAOOO damn it Carl marks got debunked

[@aagantuk7370]

Babaji unemployment ka kya karoge. Half-knowledge is dangerous.

[@the_pseudo_secular5357]

Bro we have quantity but not quality

[@theindestructible.]

@@the_pseudo_secular5357 spot on bro 😎

[@adipratap8103]

Capitalism ke bina kaise, employment laoge? Sare private industries ko band kar do. Phir pata chalega.

[@aagantuk7370]

@@adipratap8103 ... employment goal nahi hai mere bhrata

[@adipratap8103]

@@aagantuk7370 matlab?

[@princesinghbassi6228]

Misleading

[@alexander10122]

Anyone with a little sense and knowledge about economics, politics and societies will laugh at this segment. A mystic should teach mysticism but please don't try to talk about anything else or you'll will make yourself look like a fool, sadghuru..

[@playmobmeg9572]

Confusing people and audience are listening... 😂