Comparison of the Embraer C-390 Vs the Airbus A400M Military cargo plane.

[@marcioviotti1639]

Large size and mid size planes. How to compare?

[@Mathewszinho]

Both planes are excellent in their respective roles. There is no way to make a comparison of which is the best, considering that their capabilities are suitable for different types of missions. One is a competitor to the C-17 Globemaster, the other is a competitor to the C-130. But, the video was well covered in what type of mission they would do well in.

[@patrickbehrend5403]

The A400 is nowhere near the C-17. By quite a margin i must say.

[@DNPM11]

I want one of these for my country's air force 🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹 They are planes from different categories. The Kc 390 in its category is a state-of-the-art plane, it is the best in its field.

[@BernardoTorres-w5e]

They are different categories of planes , they therefore cannot be compared seriously.

[@JetlineMarvel]

You are right.. but still some like to know the both capacity

[@ricardoxnayder7162]

KC 390 🇧🇷💪

[@geerliglecluse5297]

Nice and well presented video, though this specific comparison is a little surprising. The Dutch air force pitched this Embraer C-390 against the latest C-130 Hercules version, ending up choosing the Brazilian plane to replace their current Hercules fleet.

[@barnabetavares8072]

deixa de ser burro o C390 e brasileiro seu idiota

[@sonnymagalhaes9203]

Friend, you want to know... Next time, compare a Formula 1 car with a truck... That's exactly what you did in this video. If you want to do a comparative analysis, do it between the c-130 and the c-390, which are medium tactical freighters.

[@ap8672]

C390 is value for money

[@CANALFLAMIDIA]

Although most military powers tried to sabotage it, it was impossible, the cost-benefit of the KC-390 is unbeatable, and the whole world already knows about the quality of Embraer's aircraft.

[@leonardodavincifelicianose9676]

But dude. They are aircraft for different categories. It's like comparing a Amerifan A10 with the Russian SU35. Yes you can compare, but aint it kinda pointless? ^^

[@E_Neias]

Kc390 has Gunship capacity with 1 105mm cannon and two rotary artillery machine guns. Flyware system and bomb launch docking, it was developed for multi missions in addition to...

[@marcioyoshisaki3418]

It is also made to combat bushfires… supermultipurpose!

[@klebervieira4234]

Watching from Brazil 🇧🇷

[@marcelojuliodossantos5323]

Vi um a400m atlas aqui no Brasil avião muito bonito

[@rafaeltardelle]

Kc é muito mais

[@Eversonjks]

A400 vs C17..... thats correct

[@FunYl]

KC-390 actually works while the Airbus is grounded most o f the time because it has chronicle problems.

[@JetlineMarvel]

Mostly yes

[@tyga3130]

It’s wrong, French army is using all the time all over the world even in the African desert

[@gyviocarvalho5699]

UE meu caro se apresenta defeitos e porque não presta ,,o kc390 do Brasil e MT superior

[@Rotebuehl1]

​@@gyviocarvalho5699 Ninguem afirmou, que nao presta! Disse-se que tem vindo a ter problemas, o que e triste! Mas problemas sao para ser resolvidos e ultrapassados!

[@phidoma]

@@gyviocarvalho5699 Superior não, apenas mais barato.

[@McDuff_ZA]

Very informative video

[@JetlineMarvel]

Glad you liked it

[@Istoeumapemba]

You slipped there, C-390's speed is higher than A400's.

[@regdor8187]

And the C-390 has a slightly Lower Cruise speed of 541 mph, vs A400M's Cruise speed of 485 mph.....Yikes !!

[@Eversonjks]

KC 390 Rival = C130 Hercules

[@JetlineMarvel]

Right

[@terra2jaquesmuller333]

Kc390 the best.

[@fabbiomarcello]

Boa tarde, são de categorias diferentes, carregam pesos diferentes.

[@jairoguarezifilho5240]

Não muito diferentes. 2 KC-390 fazem mais do que 1 A400 a um custo menor, e mais rapido. Para você ter uma idéia, para fazer uma missão com o A400 é preciso informar o uso de combustível previsto manualmente em vários sistemas diferentes apenas para conseguir decolar. Estimam que para fazer uma única missão, pode-se levar até 50 horas-homem apenas para deixar o avião pronto para voo. Isso impacta diretamente no índice de disponibilidade da aeronave. O C-17 possui disponibilidade média de 80%, o KC-390 possui os mesmos 80% de disponibilidade, já o A400M possuem pifios 65%, mesmo valor dos C-130J também 65%. Ou seja, com menos quantidade de KC-390 você consegue fazer mais missões que os A400M ou os C-130J, a um custo menor. Dos 21 A400M da RAAF apenas 13 estão em condições de voo. Dos 14 C-130J, 9 estão em condições. Já dos 8 C-17 sempre a ao menos 6 a 7 prontos para uso.

[@GermanGreetings]

Thank you for this comparison. For me it is helpful, to get a better feeling for the size and capabilities of this new plane.

[@JetlineMarvel]

Glad it was helpful!

[@hugoprioto8950]

Airbus A400M has better payload capacity. Mobility is kind of even, since KC-390 has better speed and A400M has better range. KC-390 has better global costs (maintenance, availability and operating cost), embraer engine (IAE V2500) is better than turboprop engine. Aquisition price is also better in KC-390

[@jairoguarezifilho5240]

The A-400 presented many development problems, including reports from the German air force that its planes cannot carry more than 29 tons.

[@duartesimoes508]

@@jairoguarezifilho5240 how much were they supposed to carry?

[@markpimlott2879]

Video WOULD BE BETTER WITH an actual HUMAN NARRATOR! AI Chatbot type fake voices are very off-putting. They greatly diminish the presentation's credibility as well! 🇨🇦 🍁 🇨🇦 🇪🇺 🇧🇷 🌎 🗺 🌏 🇧🇷 🇪🇺 🇨🇦 🍁 🇨🇦

[@newconcept8144]

Yes, it is the most beautiful aircraft among all KC-390! Why? Is the painting? What else?👏🏻🙌🏼🤜🏼🤛🏼

[@marcelopersichinirodrigues2365]

KC-390 IS BETTER: FUEL COSUMPTION, COST PER FLIGHT HOUR; MAINTENANCE; AVAILABILITY.

[@sonotornato9003]

Yes It Is partly true, but of you think about It for a moment the KC-390 has less autonomy and less payload, so to carry the load of and A-400M It takes almost 2 and 1/2 KC-390 so where Is the saving!?.

[@marcelopersichinirodrigues2365]

THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR COUNTRIES WITH LARGE TERRITORIES. FOR MOST AIR FORCES, THE IMPORTANT THING IS : ECONOMY, PERFORMANCE AND READINESS. WE LIVE IN A WORLD OF EXPENSIVE OIL AND LIMITED RESOURCES.@@sonotornato9003

[@hugoprioto8950]

@@sonotornato9003 IAE V2500 engine has higher consuption than turboprop engine. However, A400 uses four engines, against embraer, that uses only two. Besides that, turboprop engine was a poor choice (political choice, not technical one). A400 engineers wanted to use Pratt & Whitney (Canadian) engine, which would be best in technical matters. Europrop TP400 has a lot of flaws. Many were corrected, but it still does not have the maintenance and availability that IAE V2500 has. Maintenance is harder, more frequently and expensiver than IAE V2500.

[@tyga3130]

⁠@@hugoprioto8950Airbus never want get Pratt and witney turboprops. It’s impossible because A400M is a European carrier Project between France German and Spain. Europe have the experience to create their own engine. You can check with all European engine with leaf Technology for example

[@ferdinangomes2254]

Muito bom!

[@ap8672]

C390 has lower speed ?

[@Istoeumapemba]

No way, everybody knows that turbofan is faster than turboprop.

[@acajutla]

Top speed almost 1000 km/h

[@michael38824]

No comparsion

[@klausberfelde-je2ye]

There is nothing to compare!!! They are working in different capacity classes....my goodness If you want something to compare then pls take: A 400M vs. Kawasaki C-2 or Hercules C-130 j vs. Embraer C-390

[@leotka]

Should be taken in consideration Antonov-70. A400 is downgraded version of AN-70. Airbus was in negotiation with Antonov Company about join production of AN-70, but left this idea and created A400. But inspired it was later development AN-70 overperforms A400.

[@PhylphyPhil]

🇧🇷KC390🇧🇷

[@wandersonferreira7560]

certainly the KC 390 is better because it has better performance, in a possible battle for me it would be more useful

[@duartesimoes508]

The only comparison that makes sense is against the C-130, namely the J. Those who want to replace the C-130 and cannot afford the C-17 or A400 may well buy the KC-390 and enjoy her better overall performance. But if there are no budget restrictions any Nation will buy the more capable American or French aircraft. In the Portuguese Air Force, for example, the Hercules operated since 1977, a replacement was overdue and we would never afford buying the larger models. Besides, Embraer was understandably very eager to create a bridgehead in Europe for the sale of the KC-390. Anyway, it is indeed a fine aircraft. Certainly the best _for those who cannot afford the larger models._

[@henry247]

Its not only abt being affordable or not...there's no point in buy a larger plane if your country doesn't need one.

[@atilatavaresdesa3211]

O KC 390 é muito melhor não só em versatilidade, manutenção , mas também em custo benefício

[@Rotebuehl1]

The Embraer is slower than the Airbus thing? According to technical data it is the opposite

[@LjubomirKrajnovic]

Would be interesting how they compare to modernised Russian Il-76MDA90.

[@atilatavaresdesa3211]

Não faz sentido algum comparar aeronaves de categorias diferentes, uma é de porte médio e a outra é de porte grande, portanto pra mim houve clara intenção de desmerecer o KC 390, pessima comparação, nota zero pro vídeo

[@ashfaqueali555]

A400M

[@SCR_V]

0:01 what's the name of that music?

[@DiogoMotta-ro9pm]

Embraer is KC-390 no C - 390

[@GabrielSantos-rg2do]

A versão com a letra K é a que pode armazenar combustível, mas o nome padrão é só com c mesmo.

[@DiogoMotta-ro9pm]

@@GabrielSantos-rg2do mas no vídeo desprezaram o brasil colocando na comparação a versão inferior dele ...

[@AryJBAlmeida]

@@DiogoMotta-ro9pm é a mesma versão. Todos os C-390 são possuem a capacidade de reabastecer, basta adquirir o kit. Quanto a letra "K", é uma designação da Força Aérea Brasileira para indicar que é um avião tanque, não tem relação com a parte comercial da Embraer (Marketing/Vendas).

[@helltonmauroprofessor4009]

Se fosse compara o KC 390 vs o C 130 Hércules eu diria que na atualidade o kC 390 é o melhor em todos os aspectos em sua categoria , O KC 390 possui uma aerodinâmica surreal muito afrente séculos do C130 Hércules

[@-2u2]

So the 4-engine 400M hourly cost is $25,000 and the 2-engine c 390 is $24,000? It may have its nitch, but with the hourly cost being basically the same, why would you buy the miniature version of a transport aircraft... Is the hourly cost to operate the c390 incorrect, at least I hope so for Embraer's sake? The Japanese Kawasaki's cost per hour puts it in contention also with just two engines but much greater capacity and range than the c390.

[@EduardoGomes-fd1jf]

On the other hand, the 400m has to maintain 2 more engines!

[@PatrykRozgwiazda1966]

And you don't ask about its prices ... A400M Atlas price is starting about 200M USD KC390 Millenium price starts about 80M USD so you get about 5000h flying for free. Its quite a lot for military aircraft. Other question are service costs. KC390 uses regular turbofan engines like Airbus A321neo - you have to service 2 engines and there are well known for servicemen. A500M Atlas uses very rare proprietary engines (I have no information about other users of this engine) - you have to service 4 engines and only Airbus can/may service them in factory.

[@SarungKain-g7j]

AIRBUS A400M GRIZZLY ATLAS 💪🔥

[@helenrezende9012]

Fico com o KC 390

[@sergioleonelespinosavazque4792]

El Embraer parece un juguete al lado del Airbus

[@rock3times]

This comparison is flaw...the A400M is strategic, should compare with the C17...while being tactical, the KC390 counterpart is the C130 . 😊😊😊

[@adit4933]

Again, both are not comparable. C390 shall be compared to Kawasaki C-2 and AN-178

[@FabioMonteirovsm]

Not the same category, same as comparing a pick up truck to an 18 wheeler

[@carlosponchio1869]

might as well compare the 777 to a 320. night and day

[@abelardochavez3426]

No hay muchas diferencias pero EMBRAER me gusta mas

[@nelson2503]

You are providing screenshot information that does not match that included in your speech.

[@JetlineMarvel]

we will improve, thank you

[@gregwilliams386]

For a small quality military who might have Jeep or two to move. Not serious. Look who's buying them, Czechia, Hungary and small militaries who will never move their own equipment. Imagine a war starts, Brazil will guarantee parts will flow across the Atlantic?

[@donquixote1502]

Since not everyone knows the differences it is not wrong to educate people. Don't make a fuzz about that you maybe know it this time. Next time it's you who need information...

[@gyviocarvalho5699]

UE gente o kc390 esta sendo sempre testado em um dos maiores paises do mundo q e o Brasil levando ajuda as mais remotas terras do pais pousando em vários tipos de campo de pouso ,o KC 390 e superior aos demais concorrentes

[@flightfernando]

Embraer KC 390 the best: IAE V2500 some engines of Airbus A319/20/21 all world have pieces and mechanics for that.❤🎉

[@Alejandrocasabranca]

Depois compara uma Ferrari com uma carroça 😂

[@kapella9592]

No caso a carroça é o Airbus, cabe mais gente mas tem um motor lento e pouco tecnologico. Embraer claramente é a Ferrari nessa sua comparação.

[@hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf]

KC

[@VTUGYT]

You know what i have seen dozens of comments saying dont compare two different category of aircraft. Dude indian airforce is considering both of them for Medium category aircraft program as both of them are medium sized lifters

[@CarlosDaniel-c3o]

🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

[@atilatavaresdesa3211]

Bola fora !!!!!

[@hotelpapagaio-h9r]

MAXIMUM SPEED: 980KM/H CRUISE SPEED: 870KM/H MAXIMUM RANGE: 6.130 KM Range with maximum payload: 2.820 km

[@alainjarjar2820]

C'est marrant j'ai travaillé sur des équipements de ces 2 beaux avions ici en France. 😉

[@adolfolopez1428]

Supongo que el embraer es mejor que el airbus. Como el gripen también es mejor que el Eurofighter😂😂😂

[@Floren_Andro]

¿Que puedes esperar de unos genios que van a costruir un submarino nuclear (Frances) sin tener territorios o bases lejanos, ni armamento nuclear? 😅 Imagino que su asesor militar debe ser "un cuñado" del presidente del pais...

[@randlerobbertson8792]

They are not remotely comparable.

[@ygy5103]

不是一个级别的，没有可比性。 0:40