Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus vs Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4

Welcome to True Choice, your trusted source for honest and in-depth product comparisons! In today's showdown, we're comparing two outstanding all-season tires: the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus and the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4. Whether you're looking to enhance your vehicle's performance or seeking reliable tires for year-round driving, this video will break down everything you need to know to make the best decision.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus: amzn.to/4hY7z6q
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4: amzn.to/3CEP2fl
🔍 What We Cover in This Video:
Performance: Traction, handling, and braking capabilities in various weather conditions
Durability & Longevity: Tread life, wear resistance, and overall durability
Comfort & Noise Levels: Ride smoothness, noise reduction, and driving comfort
Fuel Efficiency: Impact on your vehicle’s fuel consumption
Value for Money: Pricing, warranty, and overall value proposition
By the end of this comparison, you'll have a clear understanding of which tire excels in performance, features, and value. Whether you're a daily commuter, a road trip enthusiast, or someone who values safety and reliability, we've got you covered!
👍 If you find this video helpful, please give it a thumbs up, subscribe to True Choice, and hit the notification bell so you never miss an update!
💬 Have any questions or suggestions? Drop them in the comments below - we love hearing from you!

[@Bobcat9]

Interesting contradiction I found: @1:43 The wet track 50-0mph stopping distance for the Michelin PS-AS4 is reported as 115.5 feet. @3:53 The wet track 50-0mph stopping distance for the same tire is 105.00 feet. The first record comes from Continental where their tire performs the best, at 2.2ft shorter than the Michelin PS-AS4's 115.5 feet. The second record comes from Michelin where _their_ tire performs the best, and the Conti tire is not a competitor in their test, and stops 10.5 feet shorter in their result in Conti's test. Hmm.

[@TheTrueChoice]

Great catch! It’s always interesting to compare test results from different sources, especially when manufacturers conduct their own tests. Variations in testing conditions, surfaces, and methodologies could explain the discrepancies, but it’s definitely something worth looking into further. Thanks for pointing it out!