Funny thing is that most of the current Argentinian air force are the exact same planes that fought in the Falklands by that I don't mean the same models of aircraft I mean the original aircraft
@1IbramGaunt4 жыл бұрын
We Brits have some of the original aircraft we used there still too. The difference? Ours, being nearly 40 years old now, are where they should be- in museums
@rndm75284 жыл бұрын
Argentina doesnt even have those planes anymore , actually we pretty much dont even have an Air Force
@threeleafclover60034 жыл бұрын
@@rndm7528 it's due to arms embargos and most of the argentine air force being comprised of 60+ year old planes that getting parts is becoming increasingly more difficult and expensive so their just retiring everything the own
@Destroy50003 жыл бұрын
Pretty much left over ww2 equipment
@bbqnpcs55143 жыл бұрын
My exact thoughts. The Argies haven't had much investment in their armed forces for a bit longer than just 5-10 years. More like 40-ish now. But, given the Falkland adventure, perhaps it's for better.
@dezontk1017 жыл бұрын
Don't underestimate the Argentine submarines.. they're so stealthy not even the Argies can find them.
@tntgoodyt77987 жыл бұрын
Sam W this comment is brill
@ElCanipiola7 жыл бұрын
Sam W It's sad but that's the reality of our military..
@charliefloyd61367 жыл бұрын
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA you sir shall be knighted.
@bombarderoazul7 жыл бұрын
sadly yes, honestly speaking though, argentina submarines used to be good, i read in the falklands, they actually tried to attack british ships on many ocassions, but their torpedoes malfunctioned. That's what you get when you buy weapons from NATO countries, not even the exocets worked, none of them exploded on impact, british ships were damaged or sunk by the rocket fuel that burned the ships. When you buy from NATO, you get 2nd rate and watered down versions
@julianbithell82867 жыл бұрын
Finally a comment that's not pure cancer.
@nixonsmateruby15 жыл бұрын
It was just on news. Argentine invasion force tried to invade Falklands last week, but the 3 dingies from Aldi got punctures, while still being blown up on the beach. One soldier had to be rushed home for some corned beef after feeling dizzy from blowing.
@RAKITHA94 жыл бұрын
Also their aircraft carrier had to return back as they forgot to charge their drone overnight
@someguy37664 жыл бұрын
I hope that man got a medal for his service. He almost gave his life for his country.
@parisontour4 жыл бұрын
@@someguy3766 Ahhahahah
@criadecima50593 жыл бұрын
Why don't you ask the British veterans?
@criadecima50593 жыл бұрын
@@someguy3766 Search the bottom of the sea for your glorious queen boats sunk with low-class bombs
@Gabriel-rd2mj5 жыл бұрын
I don’t think I’ve ever seen Binkov announce the results of a video at the beginning, that’s how one-sided this is
@alexiarai9555 жыл бұрын
Well he explained how so....
@ricksanchez17105 жыл бұрын
But you guys could never take the Falklands you have no navy, no army, no air force and your politicians literally take money from the countries GDP and put it into their personal account so they can spend it
@juano91415 жыл бұрын
But Argies have Latinamerica boys. And many Latin American countries would go to help. And that would be WW3 for you. Brazilian laugh "kkkkkk"
@ricksanchez17105 жыл бұрын
@@juano9141 with America's help britain would dominate south America
@juano91415 жыл бұрын
@@ricksanchez1710 maybe yes or not.
@DiegoALexis20798 жыл бұрын
I'm argentinian, and this video is absolutely accurate, or at least 90% accurate. Politics has destroyed and keeps destroying our country.
@Litany_of_Fury8 жыл бұрын
I hear there are steps in currant Argentinian politics to deescalate the situation by giving up on the Falklands or at least postponing any demands for a little while.
@DiegoALexis20798 жыл бұрын
Yes, thats true. I think the islands should belong to both countries, share its administration and have peace and prosperity ever after... but politicians are dumb beasts, thats why they are politicians in the first place... One day Argentina will have a mad president, will take us to war, and blood will be in politicians hands all over again, both sides.
@Litany_of_Fury8 жыл бұрын
DiegoALexis2079 The islanders have no interest in joint government and thus neither will the UK.
@DiegoALexis20798 жыл бұрын
Refer to the end of my sentence then... This is a two nations matter.
@Luredreier7 жыл бұрын
+Primarch Alpharius This is about more then just the people living *on* the islands. It's also about the rights to the resources within the waters around the islands both fishing, oil drilling and mining rights as well as strategic importance and national pride for two nations. The only way to settle the issue long term is some kind of compromise from both sides. Sharing the islands is potentially one such solution.
@TheIvanloco45 жыл бұрын
The thing is simple, we, the Argentinians didint have to start that awful war, just Galtieri wanted to flex and try to dont loose power in that period of time, and the shot came back, and im sayng that as an nationalist. We need to admit. We dont have anything better to give to the Kelpers (Falklanders, Malvinences) We dont have a good goverment since the XX century, We dont have a good military budget and forces to protect them, the only things that we can give to them would be, corruption, hunger, high crime rates and poverty. Its all we have atm. The military branches, they are ok only in moral and money, but they lack of equipment, an example. Our pilots have to wait minimum 4 years after their entire training to finally can fly a plane because we have almost no planes. We lost 1 Submarine last year supposedly to a malfunction of a battery (Not so much people are sure about that) the other 2 submarines are in maintenance about 8 or 5 years i think, our naval army is very weak in ships and ammunition. And now, Macri have deployed some troops to the frontiers to fight the drug trafficking that is going on in the north of the country, along side with Gendarmeria that it was part of the Military but it was separated to be an Federal Force (The best
@mookie26375 жыл бұрын
Good post Sr Sanchez. Respect due (and to your brave men who fought so hard in 1982)
@Davo-0075 жыл бұрын
So true... At the end of the day the islands belong to the people who live there. If Argentina offered them a better way of life and more support then no pointless wars would ever need to be fought over the tiny place. The People would just vote to become part of Argentina and Britain being a place of democracy would have to and be willing to honour it, just like they did with Hong Kong. Problem now with Hong Kong though is the Chinese are bullying and going against the will of the people and they now want to be back under British rule. Look after your people and they will repay you with loyalty.
@fluxoindico14675 жыл бұрын
Wow Mr. El Sanchez .. That was so pragmatic, wise and most of all .. so human ! Saludos para los Argentinos
@dulls84755 жыл бұрын
The sad thing is we are not natural enemies. We have so much more in common.
@AngloSupreme5 жыл бұрын
The whole episode was a huge mistake with ultimately only one outcome. It would be nice to see Argentina get their shit together for the population's sake.
@AvaToyShow6 жыл бұрын
Wow I had no idea there was so much military equipment and personnel down there, especially surprised at the Typhoons, they cost a fortune, like 100 million each.
@1IbramGaunt4 жыл бұрын
Worth it though. Four modern, powerful jets, two state-of-the-art warships and a company of professional British soldiers. Means total air, land and sea superiority over anything Argentina can realistically send, and without having to keep half the actual proper British armed forces down there just in case
@UnknownAnglo4 жыл бұрын
Yeah theres about 60 billion barrels of oil around the Falklands plus it gives us the Antarctic (Queens Elizabeth Land)
@MikoyanGurevichMiG214 жыл бұрын
and that's not even counting the F-35s that are in service right now. The F-35s would make this even more lopsided than it already is rn
@Ingens_Scherz4 жыл бұрын
Well, the Falklands War cost the UK $1.19 Billion in 1982 money (about $3.2 Billion in 2020) so all that kit acting as a deterrent against another invasion looks like a pretty good investment.
@chrisrowland15144 жыл бұрын
@@MikoyanGurevichMiG21 What about cruise missiles taking out the Argentinian airfields
@GWELLS285 жыл бұрын
I hope that England and the whole United Kingdom will never forget the help that Chile gave.
@ricksanchez17105 жыл бұрын
This was basically the convo between Chile and the UK Chile: "You can use one of our islands, and we'll keep an eye out for any of their stuff" Britain: "wow thanks bro I'll never forget this we shall be friends"
@sausagejockyGaming5 жыл бұрын
Rick Sanchez chile being clever, if argentina ever invaded again Uk would have no choice but to invade their mainland or else look weak and lose political influence/military influence, Uk would smash them easily and with chilean help even easier attacking from both sides also the Uk wouldnt want all the land so large portions of what use to belong to chile could be returned to them, Uk would occupy rich areas like the capital and ‘wait until peace returns’
@comanchio19765 жыл бұрын
RINGO1 England didn't, but the whole of the UK did - especially the Welsh. And to this day, I've no idea why
@mrp4105 жыл бұрын
We don't forget - we will never forget. Chile and UK are friends and help each other. I was there in 82 and I know you helped us. It's not by accident that the Chilean Navy receives modern warships courtesy of the UK.
@sorcererberoll46415 жыл бұрын
RINGO1 if Argentina invades chile they’ll be stuck between and unstoppable force and an immovable object
@siacepto6 жыл бұрын
As Argentinian I think we would lose less money as British colony than with our corrupts pig politicians. Please England, invade Argentina, we still have some British roots, we play rugby and polo
@generalkenobi51736 жыл бұрын
I don't think it's enough u need to like tea if u do like tea and vote that u want Britain then we have sas and royal marines on stand by just say the word. But anyways if Britain did invade we probably would let Argentina be run by its own people and only step in if u want us to or just stop corruption that's about it.
@6rett5 жыл бұрын
With you all the way on polo and rugby Damian, but have you met our (UK) politicians?
@ChuckstaGaming5 жыл бұрын
@@6rett yeah, if the Argentinians invade now, I reckon we would lose the islands. Gonna take a long time and a lot of money to sort out this Brexit mess. Of course, once the UK recovered, Argentina would be fracked!
@DeLunny5 жыл бұрын
We'll only invade if you let us have some of your footballers too
@toysintheattic26645 жыл бұрын
You’re getting way too good at rugby too, so we just might have to invade
@StoccTube7 жыл бұрын
You missed that there is almost always a British nuclear submarine in the area.
@thatguyonyoutubemk27465 жыл бұрын
Shhhh, we don't tell anyone that
@bober75525 жыл бұрын
@cesar garcia he didn't refer to nukes just that a British sub sank the general belgrano
@seniorslaphead83365 жыл бұрын
@cesar garcia Nuclear powered... e.g. astute class attack sub... obviously not a vanguard class nuclear missile sub... they have to stay in range of Russia.
@cadetkidkilla5 жыл бұрын
cesar garcia nuclear sub means nuclear powered not necessarily armed with nuclear missiles. More than likely Astute class submarines are around frequently enough and they’re the most potent in the world.
@Alucard-gt1zf4 жыл бұрын
@@seniorslaphead8336 we have 6 we can easily send one to the islands if we wanted
@jameswallace86086 жыл бұрын
I came for salty argies and wasn’t disappointed haha
@AC-bw2bj6 жыл бұрын
Spoils of victory hehe
@harry93925 жыл бұрын
Yea my mates in 3 and 2 PARA were selling boots when we worked in South Armagh with them .
@stopdelfinofobia88665 жыл бұрын
Cartagena de indias.
@redux386dx5 жыл бұрын
@Liam C The Falklands have been British since before Argentina existed as a country.
@theyoshi2025 жыл бұрын
@Liam C They had a referendum. Three people voted to join Argentina. THREE.
@Fummy0075 жыл бұрын
The Falklands should be renamed Argentinain't
@agustintorres54554 жыл бұрын
JAJA WHAT FUNNY JAJA
@Fur4all4 жыл бұрын
Can I give you a [drink of your choice]?
@elpanavibye18634 жыл бұрын
Aren’t gentina
@lazarjovanovic43884 жыл бұрын
@@elpanavibye1863 😭
@lamp6121 Жыл бұрын
England should be renamed Land of the dirty pirates that the whole world hates
@JckSwan6 жыл бұрын
"...right off the bat, Argentina can't take the Falklands." Teeheehee
@therealmp405 жыл бұрын
Well it comes as no surprise, its as if North Korea tried to invade SK. Argentina wouldnt risk going at war against NATO without supersonic aircraft, glass cannons for tanks and a fraction of the troops they would have to face.
@Joesolo135 жыл бұрын
@@therealmp40 honestly it's more like North Korea trying to invade Okinawa for some reason. They do have significant ground forces even if obsolete, but neither they nor Argentina really have the Navy to be pulling stunts like this
@therealmp405 жыл бұрын
@@Joesolo13 The navy really isnt an important factor here, they barely movilized them during the 1982 war because they knew their ships stood no chance against the Royal Navy, so they were just there for logistics support. What matters here is aerial superiority, which would be impossible today with Argentina's Air Force, since they don't have the Mirage, their Ground attackers or even a fraction of the A-4s they used to have, pulling off what they did in 1982 is literally impossible. The army is not obsolete, in fact, it's on par in terms of equipment to the British, except for tanks and you could argue that the modernized FAL is better than the L8A1.
@therealmp405 жыл бұрын
@Gar Could you please re-formulate your question? It's not really crystal clear for me what you are trying to say.
@therealmp405 жыл бұрын
@Gar Well, the Challenger 2 is too heavy and would have a hard time at fighting in the Falklands, while the TAM not only can penetrate it but also is much better suited for the terrain, navy is irrelevant since as I said before, Argentina wouldnt use it, the only department were the British havea massive edge is in aircraft.
@kyledoeshistory32966 жыл бұрын
This comment section is full of proud brits, triggered argentines and oblivious Americans.
@1IbramGaunt6 жыл бұрын
@@dillonblair6491 kinda a rare thing huh 😂
@y7va6 жыл бұрын
We just gave the Brits weapons so we could get a little oil as well.
@030569326 жыл бұрын
the most potent weapon we have on that island is the eurofighter, not one of yours
@hannesbaumann85096 жыл бұрын
KyleDoesHistory Surprised?
@amandafranks51086 жыл бұрын
The US uses more British weapons today than Britain uses US weapons sooooo…. your point is just bad
@LordKingPotato5 жыл бұрын
Argentina couldn't invade Morrisons if they tried...
@willmorrell4885 жыл бұрын
No because Tesco would help supply them with weapons.
@commandercody69374 жыл бұрын
And M and S would send in their finest
@celticguy1975314 жыл бұрын
i find this comment offensive lol :D
@jonnymcfarlane78664 жыл бұрын
morrisons could invade argentina
@speedbird11864 жыл бұрын
@@willmorrell488 lmao its 00:52 im lying in bed and read this comment and laugh I yt loud pissing myself.
@Uranium_Enjoyer4 жыл бұрын
I’ve never heard the term “Argies” until I went through this comment section. I prefer it since it’s way more simple than saying “Argentinians” or “Argentines”
@ProTyle4 жыл бұрын
YoshiMusic999 Argentinianeseianish
@tobiaslamanna64824 жыл бұрын
@Wuanslm but it´s inaccurate
@elcejas44054 жыл бұрын
@Wuanslm Brittishnigga
@1IbramGaunt4 жыл бұрын
@ll lll yeah? good luck with that. You guys should actually try again though, don't let this video and cold hard reality put you off! (if only because I want to see what modern RAF Typhoons would do to those barely-flying museum-pieces 😂)
@SALMR793 жыл бұрын
Argie Bargie
@avalynpoe44417 жыл бұрын
All you people in the comments section don't understand the real struggle of the Falklands. The Islands are not rightful territory of Argentina OR The United Kingdom. It was, is, and will continue to be part of the Great Penguin Empire! All hail God-Emperor Mr. Tuxedoface!
@UncannyFella5 жыл бұрын
British penguins I guess 🐧🇬🇧
@michaelabcd12425 жыл бұрын
May he reign!!!
@genericname12385 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, the penguins support British owning the Falklands, so the emus don't invade.
@bobdan98565 жыл бұрын
All hail the penguin empire. God save the Tuxedo.
@tonyobrien90465 жыл бұрын
Struggle. They speak English and due to the fisheries ie squid in the area are a wealthy island. They want to be British and are protected by sovereignty. Wake up you prick. Brit soldiers died to protect their freedom. The world has been created by history. Grow the fuck up bellend
@elfrank3337 жыл бұрын
"War is a place where young people who do not know each other and do not hate each other kill each other, because of the decision of old people who know and hate each other, but do not kill each other". Erich Hartman (THIS IS A GOOD EXAMPLE)
@robertmcveigh15726 жыл бұрын
'War is where the Young and Stupid are tricked by the Old and Bitter into Killing Eachother' Niko Bellic
@JckSwan6 жыл бұрын
Although in this case the deaths would all be on one side. We're making progress!
@norikofu5096 жыл бұрын
Tanta Verdad.
@a2falcone5 жыл бұрын
Argentina is not poor. But it is too corrupt and populist to do anything.
@danielmocsny50665 жыл бұрын
It's true, but give the young people time. If they don't die fighting each other first, they will mature into old people who hate other old people in due course.
@Synystr77 жыл бұрын
This comment section is almost as salty as the south atlantic.
@machtistdasto81744 жыл бұрын
The comment section is just fucking aids, everyone talking about "Falklands british" "falklands stronger than Argentina" "falklands argentina" "pirates" but not about the fucking video
@iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii77384 жыл бұрын
@@machtistdasto8174 but... the video is about the Falklands, and whether the Argentinians would be able to successfully invade and capture them, so wdym ppl are talking abt that, yet not the video?
@D0OMGUY3 жыл бұрын
Lmao that was good
@vodkainglassofstalinium12215 жыл бұрын
UK:- Hey wanna hear a joke ? Argentina:- okay....go ahead UK:- Falkland Islands Argentina :- I don't get it. UK:- *EXACTLY*
@mxm23adregalusandmore625 жыл бұрын
You madlad lol
@harleyokeefe51934 жыл бұрын
Vodka In Glass of Stalinium oh my god you fucking killed *him* dude
@zoe_luz_4 жыл бұрын
Shit post
@faithisstillalive19264 жыл бұрын
😂
@Zackislivid4 жыл бұрын
200Th like but nobody cares
@Mr2at8 жыл бұрын
Can you do Burger King Vs McDonalds next please.
@jordansutton8726 жыл бұрын
Using the land and employees that the company’s have at their disposal Burger King would be crushed by McDonald’s
@aguirrechronicles6 жыл бұрын
This war will be more based in a market share gain since flavor is very subjective. McDonald have more repertoire of menus that fills up every population niche, however big numbers don't mean better, they have a good product like the mcflury for example but the mccoffe is just crap. Burger King is smaller company to fail, that's an advantage and disadvantage. Their outstanding marketings give Burger King a good room for market penetration than McDonald (years of tainted reputation). However size advantage will take over by McDonald's, they have better market knowledge and client niche analysis than Burger King so later on they will come with a menu plan that will surpass Burger King in any given market, state or country, that plus they have more assets and bigger employees around the world. Labor force is about the same quality, same demographics and about the same pay, equal customer service. Health watch: both sucks if you compare to Subway.. Verdict: McDonald slow victory by 65 percent market share in a given market....in the end, McDonald will end up buying all former establishments.
@kyledoeshistory32966 жыл бұрын
InfiniteMushroom no allies allowed tho
@hnstr63686 жыл бұрын
Support McDonalds
@JustMount2rushmore86 жыл бұрын
Mr2at is
@soic96905 жыл бұрын
Can we have a video about that fleet Pepsi bought from the soviets VS the Argentine military? sounds like it would be a good matchup
@staticstatic12695 жыл бұрын
Robert Painter Pepsi navy wins. Funny enough, a good chunk of their navy was submarines.
@seangreen17693 жыл бұрын
The pepsi navy deal never actually went through 😥
@T0M_X3 жыл бұрын
Pepsi never had a navy
@soic96903 жыл бұрын
@@T0M_X Yeah, didn't know that two years ago. Learned about it since
@T0M_X3 жыл бұрын
@@soic9690 should’ve predicted the future ngl, bit stupid of u
@SePhO114 жыл бұрын
I’d take one SAS soldier armed with a spoon over the entire Argentinian Navy.
@katahajimeudegarame23974 жыл бұрын
yeah all those fancy harriers seadarts and seawolfs, they cant touch us argentina= laughs in A4
@SePhO114 жыл бұрын
katahajime ude garame what?
@shadyberero68094 жыл бұрын
This channel is not about your sexual preferences
@SePhO114 жыл бұрын
Sahdes Tree thats why i didnt say I preferred your mother...
@katahajimeudegarame23974 жыл бұрын
lol , classic bitch move "YOH MAMA"
@chileball77753 жыл бұрын
Do not worry United Kingdom from Chile we will always support you, with everything you need, 👍
@tomasolavarria75043 жыл бұрын
VIVA CHILE MIERDA
@windenergy68993 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@dizzyWLRD3 жыл бұрын
thank you👍
@luciano2003.3 жыл бұрын
No entiendo para qué los liberamos...
@locoaviador47603 жыл бұрын
@@luciano2003. son unos traidores
@djionmustard59216 жыл бұрын
Basically, The Falklands should be renamed, Islands Argentina can’t get
@Moon-eg8jy6 жыл бұрын
Florentine 193 you caught that wrong, he meant that those islands will never be Argentinian.
@javiercavo15 жыл бұрын
Argentina se debería llamar "lo que los ingleses nunca podrán disfrutar"
@aaronsalentine78765 жыл бұрын
"Cant aquire""
@luxxielul5 жыл бұрын
@@javiercavo1 Algunas de esas cosas que no podrían disfrutar serían...?
@javiercavo15 жыл бұрын
@@luxxielul si no podès encontrar la respuesta en el año 2019 con internet en el celular... no querès hacerte inglès? un pelotudo menos de èste lado...
@titanicwang20445 жыл бұрын
Argentina: Invades Falklands United Kingdom: Hold my tea
@genericname12385 жыл бұрын
America: Have some guns.
@ricksanchez17105 жыл бұрын
@@genericname1238 also America:have my aircraft carrier if you need it Britain: awwwww shucks thank you
@genericname12385 жыл бұрын
@@ricksanchez1710 internal British monologue British: Though as the British are the best, that ship belonging to us by default but ok.
@No1sonuk5 жыл бұрын
Sorry, but there'd be no need for tea-holding. Besides, it might get cold, and that's a waste of perfectly good tea! No. We finish the tea, THEN tear the enemy a new one. :)
@ricksanchez17105 жыл бұрын
@Anglo Commando nice, quick question you a Commando? Because I have PRMC soon and I'm shitting myself
@johnd20586 жыл бұрын
Historical constant: a military can be good at either fighting foreigners or controlling its own people, not both. Nations with a history of military coups rarely do well in foreign wars.
@frankwilliamk37694 жыл бұрын
sure but plenty of nations have a strong military and have good control over their people
@johnd20584 жыл бұрын
@@frankwilliamk3769 yep -- but not under a junta using soldiers to do the latter. Instead, internal police like the Stasi, KGB, Gestapo, Prussian State, &c.
@hphp314163 жыл бұрын
I was reading about Iraq Iran war, Iraqs air force did not train bombing and cas as Hussain was afraid of military coup adn then was unable to do serius damage in surprise atack
@aleksapetrovic65193 жыл бұрын
Then explain Turkey. They basicaly have tradition of coups and they are farly competant, more then some other NATO countries (looking at you Germany).
@johnd20583 жыл бұрын
@@aleksapetrovic6519 For the money, Turkey does not have a 'fairly competent' military relative to most NATO countries, including Germany. They got thrown back by punch-drunk Syrian and underdog Kurdish armies.
@P1CRR5 жыл бұрын
Argentina: *Invades the Falklands again* GB: How many times do we have to teach you this lesson, old man?!
@gladiadorargentino53473 жыл бұрын
in 1940 I was showing the world that England is weak and insignificant
@brrrrrtenjoyer3 жыл бұрын
@@gladiadorargentino5347 Britain is weak and insignificant? When they stood up to rest of Europe while you surrendered on a small ass island. Face it, you're weak.
@nou29233 жыл бұрын
@@gladiadorargentino5347 In 1940 Britain owned half the world you muppet.
@sphericalempirical93593 жыл бұрын
If they try it again, we won’t bother with a task force, we’ll just send a sub and let a ‘BIG ONE’ off the chain, to SHUT THEM UP, ONCE AND FOR ALL.
@gladiadorargentino53473 жыл бұрын
At the moment I am in London, we can meet if you want and solve this problem personally, what do you think?
@brandonwatson98017 жыл бұрын
So basically the uk beats the whole entire Argentina army with what's left on the falklands lol
@manu_spawn7 жыл бұрын
actually... yes xD
@elosogamer32197 жыл бұрын
Brandon Watson fuck you im argentinian
@diepiepew127 жыл бұрын
ElOsoGamer :3 Chile betrayed you lol
@liljefe30167 жыл бұрын
Brandon Watson no, the forces on the falklands beat what then Argies can put on the Falklands. The British Forces on the Falklands most definitely could not take all of Argentina, nor could they defeat the Argies on their own soil.
@cloroxbleach92227 жыл бұрын
Radionatix Chile never did like Argentina in the first place.
@robertoarlt3734 жыл бұрын
Iam from Chile, if Britain needs help, we are glad to help.
@1IbramGaunt4 жыл бұрын
We don't this time, not unless Argentina has a really well-hidden REAL military no-one knows about lol, which I doubt somehow; but thanks a lot for the support anyway, both back in '82 and now 🙂
@l3iievex1573 жыл бұрын
Yeah Yeah If You Send Reinforcements(heavy) weight give you a costal province at the peace deals.
@delgado77823 жыл бұрын
Soy argentino pero te re banco seduciendo ingleses para escapar de latinoamerica
@gladiadorargentino53473 жыл бұрын
small england hahaha.. I shit on the English
@1IbramGaunt3 жыл бұрын
@@gladiadorargentino5347 yeah? Prepared to actually say that to any actual British soldiers anytime soon lol?
@jethroaxel23056 жыл бұрын
For those who think that Chile betrayed Argentina: Argentina agrees with Chile to solve the Beagle conflict peacefully in 1971 (Salvador Allende and Alejandro Lanusse, the Presidents of Chile and Argentina's Junta sign a treaty). In May 1977 the arbitration gives the islands in the Beagle to Chile. in February 1978 Argentina's Junta declares the arbitration completely invalid. And requests the islands to be given to Argentina immediately. Chile asks Argentina to respect their word (and the treaty) but la junta doesnt give shit about honor and treaties. And threatens Chile to give the Islands or face a full-scale invasion (operacion soberania) Does that attitude sound familiar? Thanks to the USA's pressure, and the fact that Chileans, 3 times weaker in those years, still prepared full defense till the last minute, Argentinians withdrew from attacking. But until 1984 they refused to sign a treaty of peace and friendship, honoring the arbitration. So when they did the same thing to the British, well, what do you expect? Chileans were not going to be friends with a neighbor who did not want peace, instead has been threatening them with full-scale war against them. It's simple. Chile made sure that Argentina lost the war bc that way that dangerous, murderer, and aggressive junta would be dissolved and then, we could finally have some peace.
@LucioFercho5 жыл бұрын
@@matid9687 LOL!!!!! So ignorant, the arbitration was by the British Crown you fool! Even after your dumb military got an ass beating you still repeat their stupid propaganda, SO DUMB!!!
@darkdestroyer83134 жыл бұрын
Massive thanks to Chile and their support.
@leonardoss_984 жыл бұрын
I would say that there's one more thing that had Chile scared and is the fact that if We (Argentina) would have won the war, it was obvious that the next thing that followed was a war with Chile. Is it a kind of treason? Yes But that betrayal, surely, was induced by the Belligerent Attitude of the Military Gov. (Lieutenant Gral. Galtieri, the Drunk Bastard) and the Direct Threats they were given.
@someguy37664 жыл бұрын
Based Chile. UK is your friend forever.
@jethroaxel23054 жыл бұрын
@@matid9687 you must be the most ignorant and illiterate person ever. Read the comment again. The laudo arbitral was agreed and signed, to be made by the British Crown, by the presidents of both countries. If Argentina feels it is invalid, why signing the agreement in the first place???? Sight ...
@markwilliams21085 жыл бұрын
I remember the Gurkha's were real pissed because the wanted to get a hacking with there knives. Argies thought sod that and quit (sensible move really)
@Bobber2564 жыл бұрын
Even by KZbin standards, that's a pretty brutal piece of prose.
@mrjasonsamuel233 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't pick a fight with the gurkhas
@sussusagogus14113 жыл бұрын
Could have saved loads of time by just sending 1 Gurkha in a boat to take the Falklands back. They would have surrendered before he even stepped onto the beach😂
@alynwilliams15483 жыл бұрын
Very sensible, Gurkha's are some of the toughest fuckers around.
@clarkmirkbell8803 жыл бұрын
i know the Military junta thinked to put gauchos of corrientes with Facons ( Bayonets but much larger ) agaisnt burkas , but the war ended before the plan was Maked
@MrRooibos1234 жыл бұрын
Pepsi could beat Argentina
@kerrwallace70904 жыл бұрын
The English Gentleman, it’s sad that this is true
@harleyokeefe51934 жыл бұрын
Kerr Wallace it’s not sad it’s fucking hilarious
@aregularperson75734 жыл бұрын
Kerr Wallace and yes Chile could kick Argentina A@S
@kerrwallace70904 жыл бұрын
Mateo Gorostiaga, Jesus calm down dude
@ernestkhalimov53684 жыл бұрын
Well Pepsi used to have the 6th largest army In the world. (It's true google it)
@isunlloaoll8 жыл бұрын
Please do UK vs Spain over Gibraltar.
@lunaticpeter25608 жыл бұрын
ARVIN YES PLAESE!!!
@Wolfboys5898 жыл бұрын
gavi deem So what? It's a fictional scenario- it doesn't have to be factually confined.
@Bullet-Tooth-Tony-8 жыл бұрын
look up the great siege of gilbralta. You know what the outcome will be ;)
@RoyalePukes8 жыл бұрын
Rip Spain
@isunlloaoll8 жыл бұрын
Bullet-Tooth Tony Yea but there's a difference between back then and now. back then a few hundred men can basically hold a mountain for as long as their supplies allowed. Now, tanks would roll pass the border and into Gibraltar in minutes. The war would have to be the take back of Gibraltar by UK, since there's basically no real garrison in Gibraltar but a few hundred light infantry and patrol boats.
@anindyanarayansingh78968 жыл бұрын
Hey Binkov INDIA Vs Pakistan next please ! 😇
@DOSFS8 жыл бұрын
Not include Nuke = RIP Pakistan LOL Pakistan armed force is strength..... but Indian armed force is MUCH MUCH MORE POWERFUL!
@raftash52798 жыл бұрын
Ah, there's the Indians talking about how great their country is but yet choose to live in Australia, USA or Canada. Oh, and don't make me send a Pigeon to spy on you.
@sanjitbolina74818 жыл бұрын
अनिन्द्य नारायण सिंह more appropriate to do a India vs China video since it is obvious that India would easily defeat Pakistan in a conventional war!
@raftash52798 жыл бұрын
No they wouldn't. China would anhilate India if they dared to touch Pakistan. Besides, even in Kargil, India made very little strategic gains. But then again, this is the same military that shoots pellets at innocent civilians and couldn't do anything to Pakistan even with a so called "Surgical strike". India has quantity but pakistan has Quality.
@DOSFS8 жыл бұрын
Chinese Armed Force stronger than India Armed Force? = YES Chinese can annihilate India without Nukes? = NO :v
@KreigWes4 жыл бұрын
Came here for salty Argies and I wasn’t disappointed, God save the Queen hahaha!
@sneakysky63983 жыл бұрын
Ahh yes we all love a stolen comment
@fergropp3 жыл бұрын
Que feliz me hace no defraudarte! soy uno de ellos.! gracias... Larga vida a las republicas fuera las Monarquias "constitucionales"!!!
@mexicobasado81773 жыл бұрын
@@fergropp nueva Zelanda, Canadá, australia etc, las monarquías constitucionales son superiores a las republicas fallidas de Latinoamérica
@fergropp3 жыл бұрын
@@mexicobasado8177 Diste Ejemplos perfectos de naciones subyugadas por las "monarquias constitucional" , son altamente superiores ...como los nazis, razas superiores.. no es si? no desperdicies tu tiempo conmigo sin un argumento solido y formado. Que triste destino les espera.. .Gracias dios por nacer en esta tierra sacrificada pero de gente de paz...mi republica...gracias por no tener que ser un objetivo nuclear de los chinos y rusos... gracias gracias gracias
@TerrierMartello3 жыл бұрын
Her majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, shall continue to have her flag flown over the Falklands, by the British people, on British soil. Long live the Queen!
@a2falcone5 жыл бұрын
Argentine ships sink by themselves even when they're docked, and almost all their fighters are outdated and grounded due to lack of maintenance and cannibalization. Those facts are enough to make any further explanation unnecessary.
@justatungstenrod91735 жыл бұрын
Britain can't a second Falklands war but for Argentina it is like looking for a Someone in Space ( Observable universe area 9,300,000,000,000,000,000,000 km across ) The Argentine Navy Destroyers are a third the size of the Type 45 and their Air defences have a 6th of the Range, Even when argentina tried to buy Saab Gripens they won't save their airforce they would be Useless against Eurofighters which weigh almost 2x as much
@someguy37664 жыл бұрын
After the last war, the Argentinian ships and planes have decided they don't want another round and have decided to corrode and scuttle themselves so they can die with dignity. xD
@1IbramGaunt3 жыл бұрын
@@justatungstenrod9173 actually we wouldn't need to FIGHT a second Falklands War as just overcoming the EXISTING GARRISON on the islands themselves would be beyond Argentina at present, but if we somehow did have to actually retake them again, trust me the British armed forces COULD do it if we had to
@1IbramGaunt3 жыл бұрын
@@justatungstenrod9173 also the weight isn't really what makes the difference there, the British stuff's just better, more modern and more powerful...? And comparatively cheap though the Gripen is they don't have the cash even for that let's face it
@davidmoore12537 жыл бұрын
Basically Argentina isn't prepared to fight another war and UK is. Good video, but no mention of UK's nuclear submarines?
@massineben71987 жыл бұрын
David Moore there was non in Falklands by 2017
@peerlessbreton71826 жыл бұрын
Binkov doesn't usually take allies, morale and nuclear factors into account, focusing only on conventional warfare
@Ettannis6 жыл бұрын
The subs role is to roam UK waters and act as a mobile Nuke site, they are not at all intended for an offencive role they are a pure deterent.
@dat_sneckie_boi63756 жыл бұрын
The subs would be highly unnecessary in this scenario. Even though at least one sub patrols the waters of the world, it would not be called into action unless there was a serious threat (i.e. an argie ship getting through).
@saundyuk6 жыл бұрын
You misunderstand the difference in submarines. Our Vanguard class (soon to be upgraded to new Dreadnought class) nuclear subs would not engage in conventional warfare - that is not their purpose. But there is nothing stopping our Trafalgar (or new Astute) class Hunter-Killers from entering any naval arena.
@donfelipe75107 жыл бұрын
Not to mention that the U.K. like many NATO countries has experienced leadership and veteran soldiers from Iraq and Afghanistan. The Navy has two brand new large aircraft carriers which will soon embark the F-35 and RAF Typhoons would be more than a match for old Mirage III's.
@jackharan37916 жыл бұрын
Don Felipe they dont even have tbe mirages anymore, one of their best planes is a trainer craft which can hardly if at all fight in air to air
@georgebarnes81632 жыл бұрын
The Royal Navy does not have any F35 aircraft nor can the Typhoon be carrier launched. The RN has a few land based Hawk trainer aircraft that are being decommissioned in March this year, other than that they have a few helicopters but no fixed wing aircraft at all.
@garwhittaker37432 жыл бұрын
You clearly no nothing ..The royal navy has F35 on its carriers and Typoons on the Falklands and a New air defence system.
@georgebarnes81632 жыл бұрын
@@garwhittaker3743 Neither of the QE class aircraft carriers have any RN F35 aircraft, the QE was using USMC aircraft flown by USMC pilots.
@zebazvikle95822 жыл бұрын
I prefer Typhoons, what model of F-35? The replacement of AV-8B or Harriers sucks
@paulpowell48714 жыл бұрын
Argentina might be one of the greatest countries that never was. Wonderful people, great farming lands and sadly they dance with socialism and communism and fascism like a bad tango. corruption bleeds this beautiful woman like Dracula.
@paulpowell48714 жыл бұрын
@Sky Winger no doubt, a great country and a great people. In history it amazes me that the southern hemisphere has never had a true superpower. Now in football!!!!! that's another story!
@katahajimeudegarame23974 жыл бұрын
you should read about churchills toughts about argentina and how the empire should procede
@katahajimeudegarame23974 жыл бұрын
@Sky Winger yeah but not for argentina it wasnt , our military was top notch on the late 1800´s , being the first military to introduce the mausser rifle, selling boats and training japanese navy, then churchill took interesed in bringing us down.
@deplorabled16954 жыл бұрын
@Gar I think about the same things. Canada, USA, NZ and Australia - all incredible countries. The French and Spanish have never been able to build a colonial legacy anywhere like it. South Africa too.
@joaquincimas5004 жыл бұрын
@Sky Winger WTF did you really think like that. Otherwise you should look outside the U.S/Canada/Australia and New Zealand. Cause that colonies were population ones, with a really low natural population. It's fair to said that spanish colonial structure cause a lot of damage to the old South American countries. But U.K didn't do great things outside some (little by that time) population colonies. Saludos desde España.
@Amin-ij6mi8 жыл бұрын
Iran vs Saudia arabia next please
@lamarlovesfreedom9318 жыл бұрын
Amin Alsous Iran win easy
@Amin-ij6mi8 жыл бұрын
i dont think iran can win saudia arabia air force much larger and better than iran and saudi has better weapons and tanks than iran
@ArtemisX1528 жыл бұрын
Iran would be crushed XD
@TheRobster20078 жыл бұрын
Lol, Iran would certainly not be crushed. Look at Saudi's record against Yemen, a 3rd world country. Some of the best planes in the world, but their training is rubbish. And how would they invade? Have you ever seen a map of Iran? You armchair kiddie generals are comical.
@lamarlovesfreedom9318 жыл бұрын
Amin Alsous Lol arabs are terrible in war. Remember when they invaded Israel the day after Israel gained independence and got their asses kicked. LOL
@mariacornwallis16023 жыл бұрын
At the time, the British armed forces were led by a general who had fought in Normandy against the Wehrmacht, an admiral who had fought in the Battle of the North Cape, and a chief air marshal who had been over Berlin ten times in Lancaster. led by an admiral as chief of staff who had been in the Maltese convoys. It's hard to think of a more foolish decision than to fight men like that, who were ultimately backed by politicians. Having said all that the Argntine commanders did have some experience in shooting demonstrators, trade unionists and communists; and dropping 30,000 argentine civilians from a helicopter into the Atlantic Ocean.... But nobody who could fight back
@marianop9214 Жыл бұрын
you meant to say 8000 thousand civilians?
@jeanbethencourt1506 Жыл бұрын
The British had supplies, intelligence, and the world's most advanced weapons gifted by the Pentagon. In addition to experience kicking pregnant women to death in Cyprus and mowing down Greeks that were asking for self determination, they also were great at beating Kenyans until they stopped breathing. This was all just a few years before the US held their hands through the Falklands war. And still, the Argies were able to fry to death a ship or two full of Welshmen.
@nottmjas Жыл бұрын
@@jeanbethencourt1506 at least our subs exploded your ships rather than self implode like yours did recently
@jeanbethencourt1506 Жыл бұрын
@@nottmjas tell that to the boys that served on the RFA Sir Galahad and see if that can bring them some comfort.
@loyalist5736 Жыл бұрын
@ Jean Bethencourt Argentine Air force beaten 21-0 in air to air combat, Argentine navy RAN AWAY ..Argentine army dug in on the high ground surrounded by mine fields with artillery support and still lost to a military that had to travel 8000 miles ..Shameful. lol
@tentonneskeleton85118 жыл бұрын
Holy shit I requested this! Thank you so much! Keep up the good work, we love you!
@fabnobody83168 жыл бұрын
That was a good suggestion.
@globalnews67483 жыл бұрын
No penguins died in the making of this video.
@sammni8 жыл бұрын
Stay of our islands Argentina!
@Androrac8 жыл бұрын
Calm down He man. Shouldn't you be worried about the muslims that invaded your other islands?
@g.b.12248 жыл бұрын
Androrac Oh snap!!
@EscapeMCP8 жыл бұрын
STAY OFF OUR ISLANDS ARGENTINA.... ARRRRRGGGGHHHH! :)
@sammni8 жыл бұрын
Androrac Am from Northern Ireland, No Muslim invasion here
@psammiad8 жыл бұрын
Some of those Muslims are quite hot, and they get buttfucked by us too.
@Joethefro4566 жыл бұрын
Sinking the belgrano was justified as the British saw that the Argies didn’t have good submarines like the UK and so turned the Belgrano into a submarine
@agerestricted99325 жыл бұрын
Edgi boi
@javiercavo15 жыл бұрын
lot of People death. Do you really think are you funny?
@bobdan98565 жыл бұрын
@@javiercavo1 I found it funny and the Argies have no one to blame but themselves.
@javiercavo15 жыл бұрын
@@bobdan9856 ask to the 255 GB soldiers death´s relatives plus 300 suicided after the war, about what so funny is.
@MonarchyControl2855 жыл бұрын
@@javiercavo1 Sometimes you have to make comedy where comedy isn't usually seen. Much like 9/11 is joked about. We don't mourn over medieval noble deaths on the battlefield, and this is much the same. I don't enjoy the number of deaths, but one of the few ways to move on is to make jokes about it :)
@elosogamer32197 жыл бұрын
I accept, im argentinian, you British have better army, enjoy the falklands.
@twenty-oneflightattendants37597 жыл бұрын
ElOsoGamer :3 why thank you sir
@twenty-oneflightattendants37597 жыл бұрын
ElOsoGamer :3 we will enjoy it very much
@umbrellacorporation57237 жыл бұрын
Don't worry, Argentina. It's doesn't matter what puppet is in british throne, Falkland will be liberated and it will be soon just wait and watch.
@gonzaloamor44147 жыл бұрын
ElOsoGamer :3 en la guerra de las malvinas nosotros los argentinos teníamos armanento viejo, la mayoría eran adolescentes de 18 años obligados a pelear en cambio los británicos tenían armamento mas moderado con veteranos de la guerra por eso gano inglaterra
@1IbramGaunt7 жыл бұрын
Well you've been 'waiting and watching' for 32 years so far? don't you think you'd better get a move on while there's still a semblance of an Argentina left TO try taking them again?
@sheeplebarn3335 жыл бұрын
I cannot find this place called "malvinas" anywhere on the map - must get off freeway at place called "Falklands" to ask for directions
@katahajimeudegarame23974 жыл бұрын
you should try once in your life to read an spanish lenguage map, they all say malvinas except for chileneans off course
@someguy37664 жыл бұрын
@@katahajimeudegarame2397 Based Chileans.
@henrikfitch40174 жыл бұрын
@@someguy3766 I love Chileans, they are so chill (pun intended) and they have created the only first world country in South America Mad respect for Chile
@zoe_luz_4 жыл бұрын
Do you know Spanish? You should learn..
@henrikfitch40174 жыл бұрын
@@zoe_luz_ Do you know comedy? You should learn
@rushilsharma16365 жыл бұрын
Holy bullshit. Argentina can win this time. Because they have *Messi*
@warfaremessiah29295 жыл бұрын
Recent World Cup in Russia England did better than Argentina Just saying
@a2falcone5 жыл бұрын
@@warfaremessiah2929 that's the joke, I think. Messi has never won anything playing for Argentina.
@DokktorDeth5 жыл бұрын
Trying to make light of an obviously Messi situation eh, Messi?? Chortle.
@DavBlc75 жыл бұрын
@@a2falcone But he can win for Barcelona against Man Utd tomorrow and in next two weeks (April 2019 for Champion league quarter finals!) lol!
@locatedeatar36425 жыл бұрын
nop, messi bring 0 cups to Argis PD, I'm Chilean so we take 2 of those from they hans
@BeardedBill868 жыл бұрын
And it only gets worse for Argentina, as the first Queen Elizabeth class supercarrier will be ready for launch after 2017. Meaning the UK will have power projection equivalent to a US carrier battle group.
@sparkymalarky43228 жыл бұрын
that ship is unbelievable
@hobbyistcontrarian43898 жыл бұрын
I believe it's already been launched. It's due to enter service in 2021, and the sister-ship will be launched in 2018.
@lamri13uk8 жыл бұрын
BeardedBill86 It doesn't even have catapults, and neither is it nuclear! It could've been so damn better :(
@Kyle-ek4gr8 жыл бұрын
We have nuclear subs
@LH1980XX8 жыл бұрын
The QE class carrier is a white elephant. It isn't even remotely in the same league as a US carrier battle group. I see US carrier fleets come in to Hong Kong now and again. It's not just the carrier it's the support ships. A US carrier group has the carrier, two air defence frigates, two missile cruisers several supply ships and an attack sub at the very least. They also carry a wing of 50+ aircraft. The above is for defence in depth. As it was learned in WWII that if a carrier is used alone without the above defences and support vessels it will be sunk very quickly. The QE class only has 14 aircraft (capacity is 50) ordered for it and 19 frigates in total. Here's where it gets worse. The new Daring class frigates don't work properly as they have a badly designed cooling system for the engine. It gets worse. As the Royal Navy can't afford to replace their missiles. The Harpoon will be retired at the end of 2017 and nothing is going to replace it until 2029. The Sea Viper ASTER the Royal Navy ordered it for 2010 but the first one was tested in 2014. They can't afford to replace those either Daring used one in 2016.
@johnjet988 жыл бұрын
Could you do Australia vs. Indonesia, and North vs. South Korea
@flyingpirate04568 жыл бұрын
johnjet98 ROK (South Korea) would win in days, even if the DPRK (North Korea) could build and launch its nukes the ROK would crush North Koreas Cold War era equipment, although the South Korean population and industry would be almost completely devastated for years to come
@nektariostsaparikos84108 жыл бұрын
its true that south korea has advantage in tech, in fact it has several decades more modernised equipment than north korea. However, war is won with men. north korea has a military force of 5million troops ready anytime , south korea has less and would be hard to mobilise fast enough when enemy already threatening borders. i dont doubt that south korea would win, but not as fast as you think.
@dan75648 жыл бұрын
Aus vs Indonesia would be very interesting. A small well trained army on a large landmass vs a numerous untrained army on a small landmass separated by a bit of sea. Will only become more relevant as the china seas tensions rise.
@mateijohnstone34618 жыл бұрын
Alucard Our (Australia) Navy and Airforce are our only deterrent against Indonesia. We only have 3 active Army Brigades (9,000 men on paper in total), which isn't even enough to defend all our major coastal cities. If Indonesia was able to eventually build a competent Airforce they could destroy our navy just through the usage of air-launched anti-ship missiles as our navy ships don't have any over the horizon radar capabilities. After that the only problem for Indonesia would be power projection (transporting there troops overseas) and our airforce.
@dan75648 жыл бұрын
Alex T Sounds like Binkov should settle this!
@May-ve6sr4 ай бұрын
It would been funny if the video just started, and someone said NO and it ended there.
@MrPerfumeX8 жыл бұрын
Please continue to do realistic scenarios where there is tension/probability of conflict (it will get you more views as well!), e.g. Iran vs Saudi Arabia China vs Japan China vs Taiwan India vs Pakistan India vs China South Korea vs North Korea ____________________ Other interesting scenarios could be: Malaysia vs Singapore Isreal vs Arab Alliance Australia vs Indonesia
@nunocordeirodossantos57418 жыл бұрын
MrPerfumeX agree with you
@johnjet988 жыл бұрын
Don't forget Israel vs. Iran
@someguy82238 жыл бұрын
any scenario with Singapore in would be boring. its basically a city state. surround it and everyone would starve to death...
@jerrycan17568 жыл бұрын
Amazing. Besieging an entire country simultaneously... only in Singapore.
@kapil65628 жыл бұрын
India vs China unrealistic and impossible. You seems to be ignorant about India-China relations. Malaysia vs Singapore is also unrealistic
@PugLords8 жыл бұрын
Fuck whatever else you're doing, this is so much more important
@blaise40928 жыл бұрын
Was revising then got the notification on my phone and was like fuck it
@rainmanslim46118 жыл бұрын
great to see ylu again Comissar! heres an idea: Australia vs Indonesia
@alex-sv8ru8 жыл бұрын
+Adzierul Adenan Population doesn't mean anything, it's quality not quantity.
@KLM69698 жыл бұрын
The Indonesian Military does outnumber the Australian one to almost 6 to 1
@grandmastersreaction12678 жыл бұрын
Adzierul Adenan no
@thenerdylad8828 жыл бұрын
Yeah good idea but its hard to fight an enemy in the Australian outback. Really, you can't do logistics across it only around.
@panjidharma28298 жыл бұрын
Rainman Slim it will be vietnam all over again.
@mrwri4 жыл бұрын
I'm more shocked that 1300 people in Argentina can afford an internet connection.
@garopropiedades4 жыл бұрын
Listen here, you little sh**
4 жыл бұрын
@@garopropiedades what
@Gussyboy064 жыл бұрын
@ his wifi cut off before he could finish the reply
@D0OMGUY3 жыл бұрын
@@Gussyboy06 lmfao
@Nonamelol.3 жыл бұрын
You guys are going way too far now
@ialwtttiywtrar4 жыл бұрын
The Falkland penguins want you to do an Argentina vs Falkland penguins conflict. After the emu victory in emus v Australians the penguins fancy their chances.
@Peoples_Republic_of_Devonshire4 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't fuck with those penguins
@someguy37664 жыл бұрын
Half the Argentine fleet would sink trying to reach them, the few soldiers that made it would find their old rifles rusted and jammed, the penguins would strike in vast numbers and Argentina would surrender again. It would be a flawless victory for the penguins.
@baileymash4 жыл бұрын
I mean, a nation with brains against discount ostriches worked So uh Penguins got this
@bbqnpcs55143 жыл бұрын
@@Peoples_Republic_of_Devonshire And the emus are ten times butcher than the penguins
@Peoples_Republic_of_Devonshire3 жыл бұрын
Love thev Wessex profile pic by the way lol
@jolan_tru3 жыл бұрын
"And in other news, an Amazon delivery drone-blimp takes down entire Argentine airforce in pitched dogfight."
@bzzzz44248 жыл бұрын
Hey Binkov, can you do Poland vs Germany?
@callan2298 жыл бұрын
I'm laughing so hard because you think Poland has a chance against Germany, how'd it go last time Poland?
@franzvoltz22998 жыл бұрын
Transforming Spy Well Germans military is now shit
@hudini1298 жыл бұрын
That's right. It would be very intresting. Why? Germany is still at war with Poland. They don't sign a peace. Please consider it Binkov!!!
@vinnskii18218 жыл бұрын
Transforming Spy realistically, Poland is actually just as strong as Germany. Poland even has more troops. This isn't an authoritarian Germany we're talking about here.
@hudini1298 жыл бұрын
***** That's right. Polish Land forces and air force are strong as Germans right now. Reserve are much bigger, now Poland have territorial defence, which will help alot also. I thonk that possible right now is even taking some territory from Germany. Howver what can be decisive in this eventual war is very strong German economy and more manpower
@funkydozer4 жыл бұрын
I'm actually surprised Argentinians have internet to be able to comment on how annoyed they are about losing
@applesandpairs15644 жыл бұрын
Nice 👌🇬🇧
@Czypu4 жыл бұрын
? ¿ stupidest comment ive read here
@feytkr72854 жыл бұрын
Argentines don't care what an English person thinks about them
@applesandpairs15644 жыл бұрын
@@feytkr7285 yes you do!
@Alucard-gt1zf4 жыл бұрын
@@Czypu hello argie. Trying to start another unwinnable war to hide your corrupt government? Good luck!
@exocet93738 жыл бұрын
Respect to UK from France :) Can you do a France VS Iran please ? :)
@exocet93738 жыл бұрын
***** And vice-versa ;) I'm glad to see that some British do not make "French bashing" :) Long live to UK and France, best old enemies, best rivals, best neighbours, best allies, best friends !
@scooterstudios1238 жыл бұрын
The best allies are old enemies
@aidangilbert12978 жыл бұрын
that what i love about the UK-french relationship, we have our rivalry but we got each others backs when shit hits the fan
@Gazbo1818 жыл бұрын
I live in France.. In Aquitaine.. I'm very glad for the sacrifices all our ancestors made so that i speak French, eat good food and drink the best wine... Long live the entente cordial!!
@kannymp.25228 жыл бұрын
I agree UK peep here we naturally have some rivalry but we'd never let France fall despite the issues our governments have the people in general like our neighbor so if France gets attacked I cant imagine the UK not backing them.
@goodtime43458 жыл бұрын
I already knew who was going to win before I clicked but it felt good to hear it.
@Harldin4 жыл бұрын
Argentina sends an invasion fleet towards the Falklands. The 4 British Fighter Pilots in Port Stanley play Paper, Rock Scissors to work out which one of them gets to go and sink. The three ancient 30ft Boats heading there way.
@mark6bat3 жыл бұрын
We wouldn't even need the Typhoon's, the Argentine navy has a habit of sinking my it's self!
@non-masturbatingtyrannosau34763 жыл бұрын
Come on HMS Protector could take them out
@VintageG5 жыл бұрын
I can't believe you sided with the UK for once
@ehs14524 жыл бұрын
It's just so obvious that Britain would win, even someone as anti British as this guy has to admit it.
@georgelyddane82834 жыл бұрын
EWS 134 wait he’s anti British? How do you know
@ehs14524 жыл бұрын
@@georgelyddane8283 well, not necessarily anti British, but in every conflict Britain is involved in he'll always find someway to make them lose, often stating that Britain lacks Air defences, even though BAE's are a thing. The scenarios are often always tipped in favour of the other side, he once made a video called: could the modern luftwaffe win the battle of Britain? The catch is that Germany had their current airforce but the British still had their RAF from ww2. Now if that isn't one sided I don't know what is.
@tacticalrobloxiansunited74414 жыл бұрын
EWS 134 you’re forgetting his anti British twitter posts.
@ehs14524 жыл бұрын
@@tacticalrobloxiansunited7441 I've looked through his twitter account and can't find any, care to link some?
@Gisborne19908 жыл бұрын
Argentinians are TRIGGERED by this video.
@Gisborne19908 жыл бұрын
Now i really want a Chinese takeaway :)
@XxbigibudixX8 жыл бұрын
why? For years Argentina has not thought of war, it is obvious that it can not do anything against a militarized nation, all argentines know it
@Gisborne19908 жыл бұрын
Because they were recently burning British flags in the streets and demanding the Falklands back. Then when i saw their EX coward soldier on TV being praised by the nation for lying and bragging about hiding then shooting a famous British commando in the back as they walked past then surrendering i was disgusted with the Nazi attitude of the nation.
@gialuquin88XD8 жыл бұрын
im the one that asked for this video and im more than happy with it
@whathefuzizthiz8 жыл бұрын
argentinians are too proud of themselves, im an argentinan, but understand that even if the british were the first to occupy an island that wasnt theirs, we still lost a war, losers are losers
@terrydavis63685 жыл бұрын
Britain settled the Falklands long before Argentina was founded.
@terrydavis63685 жыл бұрын
@Liam C Falklands was not populated before we arrived.
@1993Crag5 жыл бұрын
@Liam C You are so right! The Falklands should belong only to the penguins and birds!!! They were the only natives when the British arrived and it should stay that way!!!!
@nehru98634 жыл бұрын
Bullshit
@Alucard-gt1zf4 жыл бұрын
@Liam C let's forget that the majority of South America and alot of North America speaks fucking Spanish, wonder how that happened
@theant98214 жыл бұрын
@@Alucard-gt1zf and Portuguese, don't forget Portugal.
@kevinfoster9263 жыл бұрын
I was there in 1982, HMS Cardiff.
@byzantinehoney33843 жыл бұрын
Nice work mate
@lordcharles97864 жыл бұрын
Argentina: Right what can we do about reclaiming the Falklands General: *points at white board* White board: Were fucked
@fcvidt3 жыл бұрын
Genius
@georgeirwin96495 жыл бұрын
That 1.1k dislikes are from angry argies
@jakegrimzy39895 жыл бұрын
Liam C And whys that they aren’t British, because we had firstly got to the islands first and put down a plaque which had jurisdiction that the lands are rightfully owned by the British. If you don’t agree with this fact then go to the polls where they voted if they wanted Argentinian rule or British rule the outcome still didn’t change. Fact is British had rights to the land like it or not you dirty argie lover.
@comanf24545 жыл бұрын
There was already a vote in Falklands if they want Brittain or Argentina, and the result is 3 votes to Argentina and more than 1500 votes in Britain
@matid96875 жыл бұрын
@@comanf2454 It will be obvious those results if the population is changed every 10 years... _So that makes it a Colony_
@matid96875 жыл бұрын
And the first who came to the islands were the spanish, which were integrated in the Virreinato del Río de la Plata
@beachsidebooy5 жыл бұрын
I support ARG
@LOREHAMMERLIBRARY8 жыл бұрын
England vs the rest of the UK lol
@steppebro8 жыл бұрын
No chance in hell for the rest of the UK 3 days tops.
@onetwo68038 жыл бұрын
How do you think the ships, jets and tanks will be split?
@LOREHAMMERLIBRARY8 жыл бұрын
RECLAIM IRELAND! hahhaha
@AP-fo5cf8 жыл бұрын
But Scotland has all the nukes...
@AP-fo5cf8 жыл бұрын
Ben Oakden You really think the countries of the UK would go to war with eachother?
@wampower68488 жыл бұрын
Europe versus Russia. No American or international troops.
@pjotrnygard46288 жыл бұрын
its not even a qwestion russia wil easely win
@smartlp30108 жыл бұрын
easily? In wich dream do you live?
@JoeyyDoesLife8 жыл бұрын
the european union is disgusting.
@smartlp30108 жыл бұрын
adam Healy and that is relevant to the Video because...?
@smartlp30108 жыл бұрын
The Joker they would get my vote as well. But im German so yeah you cant really compare that.
@mattkay73344 жыл бұрын
It sounds to me like Argentina is virtually defenseless. I think a well coordinated boy scout troop might actually be able to occupy most of their country.
@jonathantan2469 Жыл бұрын
Not really. Their inventory is sufficient to defend themselves against an invasion by another South American country, except maybe Brazil.
@lamp6121 Жыл бұрын
@@jonathantan2469 also all Latin countries have a treaty of aid in case of war, i guess all latin countries will unite against a foreigner in order to defend Latin America's property, Argentina has a strong bond with China and Russia, and is well known there are countries from abroad who would gladly help Argentina in case of another war against the U.K, countries that absolutely hate England, countries like India could help with funding and Bangladesh hate england so much that they would send their own people as troopers. It surprises me how the English are absolutely ignorant about the amount of hate so many countries have for their country, even the british hate england lmao
@tomsoki57383 жыл бұрын
British aircraft carriers make this completely impossible, even if the Argentine military budget goes up by 3-4x, the only chance they had was before the Queen Elizabeth class carriers were complete.
@looinrims3 жыл бұрын
The carriers still have to get there in time If somehow they captured the falklands within 72 hours with surprise, they could rebuild the airstrips and contest the skies Of course that would assume a present day conflict, which for the current Air Force, would be insufficient against Queen Elizabeth’s F-35 carrier wing
@1IbramGaunt3 жыл бұрын
@@looinrims even if they got those new JF-17 Thunder aircraft from China via Pakistan they'd still stand no chance against F35's no matter what, and given the strength of the garrison, the weakness of the Argentine navy and the presence of radar on the islands, I don't see how the Argentines could possibly take the islands by surprise OR actually overcome the garrison either way even if they did, at least not within sufficient time before British reinforcements arrived
@georgebarnes81632 жыл бұрын
The British carriers are useless without aircraft, neither of the RN carriers have fixed wing aircraft.
@looinrims2 жыл бұрын
@@1IbramGaunt like I said, assuming a present day conflict with those results, not how to get those results, ultimately Binkov’s video frankly is still accurate 5 years later, and probably will be until 2030
@joric58642 жыл бұрын
@@georgebarnes8163 completely incorrect
@kingkeeper998 жыл бұрын
Colombia VS Venezuela would be a good video
@l0necroc8 жыл бұрын
KingKeeper99 shit country vs shit country would be cool
@Gazbo1818 жыл бұрын
Colombia would smash Venezuala...
@kingkeeper998 жыл бұрын
No Commentary Gaming #NCG Obviously, the more troops and people you have, the more vehicles and better airforce you need to have. But still, I think Brazil wouldn't be able to fight a coalition between various Hispanic South American countries.
@craxusalby97518 жыл бұрын
Are you kidding? Venezuela having the biggest reserve of oil is irrelevant if they can't get access to it.
@kingkeeper998 жыл бұрын
Krubukos Fuzz they do, the problem is that their government is corrupt AF...
@person82037 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of when you go up an era playing civilisation and some opponents keep their warriors with swords while you've upgraded to guns.
@allandoughty10395 жыл бұрын
I would love to see an update to this scenario after the Queen Elizabeth becomes fully operational.
@raflaughter34744 жыл бұрын
And the Prince of Wales. They are looking sexy. Needed some good replacements after the Ark, Illustrious and Invincible were scrapped. Worthy replacements.
@joelt39444 жыл бұрын
Basically they get even more trashed
@ratflakes31354 жыл бұрын
And the princd of wales aswell
@charlesharper23574 жыл бұрын
Not needed...the RAF would have things mopped up before the RN could make it down there.
@bbqnpcs55143 жыл бұрын
She hasn't been fully operational since her late 40s or so (my guess, not first hand knowledge), but the two were enough.
@Imperius17728 жыл бұрын
Two of my favorite countries in the world. A pity they have such strained relations.
@YIIMM8 жыл бұрын
Don't worry, there's been something of an entente recently after the change of government. Also, doesn't stop individual people from both countries getting along just fine :)
@Imperius17728 жыл бұрын
:)
@jamesloughton628 жыл бұрын
Relations were going really well however it seems that the Argentinian Government can't help themselves and they're bringing back claims to the islands they never owned in the first place. Us Brits don't like their Government but we've got nothing against the people.
@matiasvaldiviezo95948 жыл бұрын
me too. where you from?
@Imperius17728 жыл бұрын
Are you asking me? I hail from the United States of America.
@mally12368 жыл бұрын
One thing I will say about Argentina's air force in 82 They were extremely brave and talented they proved that You missed out fact us Brits will always have Subs in the area they are game changers
@hobbyistcontrarian43898 жыл бұрын
They weren't really. The RAF Harrier pilots did an amazing job against them.
@Trickshot728 жыл бұрын
True. Twenty seven confirmed kills for no loss.
@mally12368 жыл бұрын
The way they flew into San Carlos bay was extremely brave The harrier out performed it's own specs really They were not really fighters but more of a ground support air craft the fighter part was all theory which I'm happy to say worked quite well and surprised the Argentinian pilots with its manoeuvrability
@mally12368 жыл бұрын
Sea Harriers were a jack of all trades plane too I remember us loosing a fighter on the same day Sheffield got hit but not sure how it was taken out
@mally12368 жыл бұрын
I was watching JAG the other day and it showed a ship exploding It was actually HMS Antelope exploding I couldn't believe they had sneaked it into a TV programme especially when the bomb disposal expert was killed in the explosion
@buffgarfield32313 жыл бұрын
The UK is the second most powerful navy in the Atlantic, and last I checked, the Falklands were in the Atlantic. The only country who could take them is the US.
@lamp6121 Жыл бұрын
Colonialists being proud of their Colonial country, not surprised
@gusrtw204 жыл бұрын
"Unlike other South American countries, Argentina doesn't rely on conscripts" and I think it's better that way. In 1982 we relied on conscripts, got our ass beaten hard anyway and we destroyed many of our young men's lives, who didn't even want to be soldiers, they just wanted to go to college in their hometowns and live a peaceful civilian life. Let those who want to be soldiers be soldiers, let them earn their bread and butter with their profession, and that's it. No need to have a military force capable of invading anything when we don't really want to invade anything, it's dumb. And it's the safe way, we don't want a crazy sucker like Galtieri with their hands on a military force capable of going out to cause mischief around.
@felipeoyarzun54244 жыл бұрын
Not having ab unnecessarily strong military is a smart move in the long run, as long as you can still fully and effectively defend the whole territory from any invasion, otherwise it's just a death-wish, no one knows how could international relations be in the next 3 years or more
@board-qu9iu2 жыл бұрын
Argentina surprisingly lossed the Falkland war when tbh it really should have through Britain’s logistical issues and the superior quantity of weapons they had over the task force
@isaac6705 Жыл бұрын
@@board-qu9iu It really wasn't a surprising loss. US State Dept was trying to play neutral, but very clearly told the Argentines they'd lose, thoroughly. There was a delusion on the part of Argentina. It was a gamble that the UK would just shrug at the invasion, but almost every intelligence agency, in Europe, the USSR, and the US were fully aware that the Argentines were playing with fire, and likely to get their shit pushed in if the UK decided the Falkland Islands were worth recapturing.
@board-qu9iu Жыл бұрын
@@isaac6705 it was a surprising how badly they lossed since Britiain had to build thousands of miles of logistics to even send a group there ...
@Smoothbluehero8 жыл бұрын
Do Brazil vs. Argentina. Or do Switzerland's ability to defend itself against EU invasion, or perhaps just France or Germany.
@Septimus_ii8 жыл бұрын
Switzerland v others would be interesting
@titus_philemon8 жыл бұрын
Now we all already know that Argentina's military sucks, so Brazil would win easy easy .... But i think Brazil vs Mexico would b a good one!
@leonardoflorentin8 жыл бұрын
+Titus Philemon Hatcher LOL mexico and brasil can't win against the narcos, much less they could do a war, the truth is that the only one who fought a modern war was argentina, while brazil and mexico were doing the same think they do now, fighting against the narcos. XD
@ricardososa75348 жыл бұрын
leonardoflorentin I mean it's much harder to deal with a war on drugs than an actual war.
@leonardoflorentin8 жыл бұрын
Ricardo Sosa Not harder, DIFFERENT. an open war is always harder and more brutal than a war on drug cartels, but a wasr on drug has far more political complications.
@killian93145 жыл бұрын
Historical Thing i just found out: the british brigade that was permanently standing in the Falklands composed of royal marines, Held off the initial Argentinian Attack, Blew up a Helicopter, destroyed an incoming troop lander on a beach, and Disabled an argentinian submarine (didnt sink, but was unusable for the war), and then held on in port stanley until they ran out of ammo, and the argentinians threatened to napalm port stanley, so they surrendered.
@cee91104 жыл бұрын
You've got your numbers mixed up. There were 22 royal marines. A british brigade is between 3500 and 4000
@jdb47games2 жыл бұрын
You've muddled up several different units and actions.
@killian93142 жыл бұрын
@@jdb47games i should mention that i was poorly remembering a greentext i read at 1 am. it could even be false so. sorry
@anthonyodonnell61052 жыл бұрын
The sub was disabled at South Georgia.
@ArchefluxxMusic8 жыл бұрын
Fascinating stuff. Could you do a similar video for Gibraltar some time? Spain and the UK are largely at odds over this
@isunlloaoll8 жыл бұрын
Archefluxx Returns Yes that would be so interesting.
@LB-oz9hv4 жыл бұрын
Basically the Argentine military was much more powerful in 1982 and the British position is much better in the theater than in 1982.
@juanbautistadoynel19648 жыл бұрын
I'm argentinian and it really makes me sad reading those comments of british people that say all bad things about Argentina, and they don't even know that Argentina wants peace, our country don't like war, actually, they only have those military force for caution and for our country. Also, I can't believe other british insulting our "SOLDIERS" of that time, THEY WEREN'T EVEN SOLDIERS, they almost didn't have training! I thought that british were serious and maybe intelligent people, come on...
@juanbautistadoynel19648 жыл бұрын
EpicDanGaming I don't believe your comment mate, England attacked the falklands (malvinas, before it were of England) not Argentina (it wouldn't have sense), but if you refeer to defend Argentina obviusly we will do, if someone wan't to take something yours would you let that person take it? (not in case of a thief).
@juanbautistadoynel19648 жыл бұрын
Man wtf? In war no one care who hate you and who not, if we will talk about hating other countries also hate England (now a days), although, isn't the case of Argentina. But I just don't understand your comment, "99% of the population want to be british"? That's not true.
@limn58118 жыл бұрын
It was actually 99.8% en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_referendum,_2013
@grahamkeithtodd8 жыл бұрын
well have you really stopped to ask why?...your country invaded the Falkland islands in the first place! your army air force and navy took over a group is islands that wanted nothing to do with your corrupt and evil government in the first place!
@juanbautistadoynel19648 жыл бұрын
Graham Keith Todd WHAT THE FUCK? Man, your stupid president/ex president (idk) is who ordered to invade the falklands, just TO DEMOSTRATE THAT SHE HAD POWER. Yes, just for that, not for oil or other interesting things, just to demostrate power.
@svenhaheim5 жыл бұрын
Was the most exciting TV during the 80ies as well, still remember the excitement from the daily updates here in Norway.
@garwhittaker37435 жыл бұрын
Same in the UK ,war is our birth right .This country just loves to fight and if we can't fined anyone we will go to football and knock 10 bells out of each other. .
@timg20883 жыл бұрын
I remember it well! I was 12 yrs old and I remember playing with my toy airplanes pretending I was bombing Port Stanley.
@bbqnpcs55143 жыл бұрын
It was a fun distraction from the much more anxiety-causing prospect of a Thermonuclear World War iii. Like two kids fighting in the schoolyard. With similar potential ramifications for the rest of the planet.
@OPTSXFilosoofis8 жыл бұрын
US vs all south and Latin American nations
@EstNix8 жыл бұрын
OPTSXFilosoofis Like 90% of the countries if not all are falling apart like Argentina
@pieman1418 жыл бұрын
That would just turn into another Iraq, even if the US takes down every country's army, they'd be dealing with rebels for decades.
@r-saint8 жыл бұрын
Is that COD:Ghosts out there? :D
@BrezelCeviche8 жыл бұрын
As someone who has lived in South America for more than 20 years I can say that, there is no chance of South American victory. Assuming it is a total war. Still, it would be a very cool scenario to watch.
@badcornflakes63748 жыл бұрын
OPTSXFilosoofis Aye That's Ghost Recon!!!!!!
@Mago.-4 жыл бұрын
Im argentinian, and to answer this, we couldnt in 82, we couldnt have in 2017 and guess what, hasnt changed.
@gladiadorargentino53473 жыл бұрын
I am Argentine and could say that the English envy the Argentines
@gladiadorargentino53473 жыл бұрын
@Glow in the dark it's a matter of blood, you would never understand
@jameslyons5323 жыл бұрын
@@gladiadorargentino5347 explain it then haha
@jameslyons5323 жыл бұрын
@@gladiadorargentino5347 explain it then haha
@Hail_Full_of_Grace3 жыл бұрын
@@gladiadorargentino5347 we had the greatest empire in human history and created the modern world and you think we envy Argentine blood XD lololol
@talktoomemoose76868 жыл бұрын
sweden vs finland, sweden trying too retake the Åland island group
@giorgilobjanidze56678 жыл бұрын
the fins will win come on
@talktoomemoose76868 жыл бұрын
giorgi lobjanidze probably, but it would be intresting
@Deadeye0120118 жыл бұрын
Linus Lindberg The Fins would win Sweden would be to busy arguing whether their uniforms were Gender Neutral.
@Thurnmourer8 жыл бұрын
huehue modern sweden brings great shame to gustavs ears
@vanstockholm37128 жыл бұрын
Linus Lindberg Easy, Sweden wins. Åland is ours!
@brandonbp1225 жыл бұрын
I was a small boy when my granddad took me to England and this was going on. The English we were staying with were a bit dismayed that Ronald Reagan and the USA would have no part of it. My granddad said, "Argentina? I think you guys can do this."
@williammorley24012 жыл бұрын
Brandon BP, grandad must of been disappointed that he was wrong!
@davidschultz6828 жыл бұрын
you should do Canada vs anybody I wonder if there's anyone Canada can beat
@brynwilliams44868 жыл бұрын
David Schultz well based of this video I'm sure we could beat Argentina. Canada vs Australia would be pretty cool and relatively even I think.
@davidschultz6828 жыл бұрын
Bryn williams do you know the current state of our Armed Forces it's horrible and pathetic I am ashamed to be Canadian
@lazysunside8 жыл бұрын
Canada vs the Pope.
@xXGamerXDarkXx8 жыл бұрын
The reason probably being is because there isn't really a reason for them to have a large army. I can't possibly think of any logical reason why anybody would attack them besides minor terrorist attacks. Canada really doesn't have any enemies, while the USA clearly has a lot they could/need to defend from. Plus, there is NATO.
@davidschultz6828 жыл бұрын
Zephyr there's is Quebec and a potential Civil War due to them wanting to speak stupid French
@benwhitehead58064 жыл бұрын
0:22 the answer is they would get massacred cos they just let us make 2 new aircraft carriers with the most advanced jets on the planet
@imranraja61568 жыл бұрын
Thank you listening and doing this video! Another interesting concept could be the UK against Germany in keeping with the revisiting history. Two European powerhouses situated closely together with both sides having respectable militaries should make it interesting! Or if you want to take a break from the UK as you've done a number of videos on them, an interesting one would be perhaps Iran vs Israel? Could be quite fun basing a video in the Middle East
@thomasherrin6798 Жыл бұрын
@Louis_George_Music Non aggressive, I think you underestimate the UK, we are enjoying a lull in hostilities but it won't take us long to get back into the swing of things should the need arise, we are a warrior race, we have a long track record, ditto Germany, we most probably would be allies and fighting somebody else though these days!?!
@darth_raven_sith3rd3917 жыл бұрын
Britain could easily defend the falklands island due to that Argentina has hardly any military to attack it!
@vloneeddy7826 жыл бұрын
you look like the yodeling kid
@SolidCat6 жыл бұрын
Idk Ok that’s not him, it’s from a meme from last year
@vloneeddy7826 жыл бұрын
Harry Yates Finally a genius person
@tsu80036 жыл бұрын
RGD - I take it you have never heard of NATO, which both Britain and Spain are members of!
@patthonsirilim57396 жыл бұрын
so for Argentina to succeed they need to get the Spanish to invade a fellow NATO member severing whatever military and economic ties they and friendly relationship with the uk and straining there relationship with other developed nation and Ireland to invade northern Ireland which is a part of uk with a force even more questionable then the Argentinian military near the proximity of the bulk of uk military and have the Russian which already have far to many things to fund and people suffering form economic stagnation to relinquish even more of there remaining budget to aid multiple campaign that will see most of the benefit going to Argentina at the sacrifice of its own people and power for little to no benefits and involve Britain herself and her allies doing absolutely nothing to aid or defend themselves at the planing of such a massive coordinated maneuver that will take months to plan and years to execute at best i think winning the lottery while being strike by a lightning driving a car that roll over the hill and then waking up to have scarlet Johnson blowing you is more likely to happen
@burstcity38323 жыл бұрын
If the ship on rotation is one of the newer ones it could take down their entire airforce by it's self, those ships are brutal.
@britamericaball25055 жыл бұрын
When Argentina invades you with a big force but you just defeat them with a smaller forces *laughs in British*
@FabianIJ5 жыл бұрын
the Argentine soldiers were only boys, who did not know they were being sent to die...
@JohnMacbeth5 жыл бұрын
@@FabianIJ I fail to see how that makes any difference. You have a crazy dictator in power, he willingly sends untrained, underequiped conscripts to invade another nations territory and assume there won't be consequences? If you're getting in the pit expect to get bitten.
@dansomething77425 жыл бұрын
@@FabianIJ if your being sent to war you have to know there is a decent chance though
@ls2000764 жыл бұрын
@@FabianIJ You know as a soldier that dying is a thing that can happen. You signed up (or forced) for that. Everybody knows knows that.
@shaunmcmillan67914 жыл бұрын
Fabián J. Not the ones I saw....
@curtisjohnson99102 жыл бұрын
The five years are up. Can we get an update?
@luciano2003.2 жыл бұрын
We are still wrong 🇦🇷
@curtisjohnson99102 жыл бұрын
@@luciano2003. ,it's time Argentina drop that silly claim
@luciano2003.2 жыл бұрын
@@curtisjohnson9910 Never bro 🇦🇷😢
@Aron-ru5zk2 жыл бұрын
@@luciano2003. why do you even want an island full of people who don’t like you and don’t speak your language?
@curtisjohnson99102 жыл бұрын
@@luciano2003. ,it's you all blood that will spill
@douma95453 жыл бұрын
Sad...I'm Argentinian and mi Uncle Lost His Life in Falklands/Malvinas war...
@curwajaja26813 жыл бұрын
That is really sad I heard Argentina used conscripts so it sounds like the people didn’t even want to fight
@douma95453 жыл бұрын
@@curwajaja2681 Yes, they lie and they said that we Argentines are Winning the war when in reality we were Losing, they were Soldiers without Experience. My uncle died at the age of 19 and like him there were young soldiers. the truth a useless war that could have been solved peacefully.
@curwajaja26813 жыл бұрын
@@douma9545 that’s a shame I never knew they were tricked into fighting
@douma95453 жыл бұрын
@@curwajaja2681 It is better that the Islands are British, Argentina is in a very bad economic and social crisis which is creating an anarchy in the country :(👎
@curwajaja26813 жыл бұрын
@@douma9545 well I hope good people like you are keeping well especially with COVID making things even worse :(
@rusitoexplorador5 жыл бұрын
Na, it wont happen, here in Argentina the biggest percentage of the population is pretty chill about the Falklands/Malvinas. We will greet you with good meat and Tango if you come to our country and I hope if we go the Falklands as tourists you will greet us with the best fish and chips 😜
@sorcererberoll46415 жыл бұрын
There might be some apprehension on the elderly portion of the islands for obvious reason but you probably find more look in the younger portion
@firehazzard84975 жыл бұрын
We will soon have penguin butlers if you want to move there.
@darkdestroyer83134 жыл бұрын
Or if you the Top Gear team treat them with stones and threats of death, which you still failed at.
@Alucard-gt1zf4 жыл бұрын
Yeah top gear has told me otherwise
@sebastianb.40484 жыл бұрын
@@sorcererberoll4641 young people is the future!
@tSp2893 жыл бұрын
Also the type 45 missile destroyer currently defending them theoretically has the capability to shoot down all of the offensive part of the Argentinan air force, then start on the training and cargo planes before it'd have to reload.