Which Korea has a stronger army? Can North Korea conquer the South?

[@user-ci9ec5mp3z]

I love how there’s a category just labelled ‘hopeless’

[@jimtalbott9535]

Mostly for just-post-WW2 relics.

[@scudb5509]

MiG-17s can still be used to good effect for infantry support, only if that enemy infantry doesn’t have SAMs or AF support.

[@scudb5509]

Darth Vader Not if they scavenged all the other ones for parts.

[@ravenmusic6392]

@@scudb5509 Yeah but most countries have fairly decent SAM systems, most of said systems which are post 70s are likely to succeed as thier hit chance against older planes is nearly 50%.

[@thesilenthero422]

I always Google the "hopeless" ones

[@kharn56]

Vatican City vs Monaco please !

[@spyantreas]

hahahah u need more likes

[@stucov6064]

Need more like!

[@tobiassol8343]

the italian police would stop them

[@darken2417]

Monaco is incapable of declaring war on Vatican City due to having Catholicism as its official religion in its constitution. Perhaps Uruguay (a pain to spell) would be a better fit?

[@dernierergenekon5234]

Swiss guardians vs monaco football team

[@massineben7198]

6:52 "with nukes, this scenario goes even more fantastic" - Binkov 2017

[@trottheblackdog]

Bear in mind, Europeans use the word "fantastic" as in "fantasy" or unrealistic.

[@RealMadrid-bg7im]

안ㄱ

[@nota_ghost9885]

수 🏫 coincidence? I think not!

[@gamingandcomplaininggc4]

*FANTASTIC*

[@Gunner6000WarZ]

@TobyTheBlackDog - I think the word you're looking for is "Fantastical"....

[@pilotlist6276]

North and South Korea, shortly after the DMZ is established: “Sir that area is demilitarized.” “How about, we militarize the area around it!”

[@jacobjohnson4785]

The demilitarised zone is filled with soldiers Its a misleading name

[@ChristesII]

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room!

[@waynec4018]

@@jacobjohnson4785 The demilitarized part is filled with wildlife and landmines.

[@makeshift9440]

@@waynec4018 As a Korean, I can say that we have troops in the demilitarized zone. It's just that they don't go there as 'soldiers,' but as temporary 'civilian police' despite still being part of the Korean Army

[@shark0915]

DMZ(X) HMZ(Heavily Armed Zone)

[@Braycali]

“What if us forces just left?” Kurds: “first time?”

[@Braycali]

Adolf Hitler we did it reddit

[@jonathanbrito2787]

I will slap your face braycali

[@FLJuJitsu]

And then like a month later we send our troops right back in because our leaders are children.

[@chronus4421]

Algorithim saw the K word and auto up-voted it, lol

[@roryhaidar9164]

South Vietnam : First Time also

[@akeiai]

Nuclear attack: UN: That's illegal US: That's illegal Every single nation: *wAnT my tRoOPs?*

[@Pappy7179]

UN has provided 999999999999 Fully Trained troops to deal with the 3000000 strong conscripts that will probably surrender.

[@eln5343]

US: That's cultural appropriation

[@lisza7554]

I like how you put in "hopeless" on those J5 and migs XD

[@shastealyomeal]

And i like you

[@coolguy3848]

@@shastealyomeal Simp

[@lazarjovanovic4388]

@@coolguy3848 that was almost a year ago...

[@cashewsinc.5647]

@@lazarjovanovic4388 So was this comment

[@wog6523]

Yet a MiG-15 shot down a F-16 in afghanistan or iraq i forgot

[@eric97909]

I always love the ending about peace

[@metanumia]

Yes, I am so glad Binkov continues to include the message about encouraging peace at the end of his videos! This channel is fantastic for viewers who are fascinated by military strategy, tactics, history, technology, and hypothetical battles, but I think (I hope) most of us *never* want any of these battles to actually take place!

[@looinrims]

Very underrated aspect War is humanity’s lifeblood and best education, but war should be avoided at every turn

[@bacburnett3004]

WAR!

[@bacburnett3004]

@@looinrims real peace is WAR.

[@bacburnett3004]

Words don't mean NOTHING. Especially when they are being Broken while being Written truly. WAR will determine what is what truly.

[@akiratay6128]

Ajit pai vs net neutrality

[@slenderman27490]

Ajit Pai decisive victory

[@LordBob]

given the current situation, he cannot win unless he was literally the only lawmaker in the entire country

[@phukmigud4917]

Mark the zucc vs memes

[@randomlyentertaining8287]

Net "Neutrality" loses

[@talisdorman.9796]

There is a terrifying quote I took from someone, "When you have more soldiers than the enemy's munitions.".

[@DeclinedMercy]

Basically China in the Korean War

[@JoaoOstroski420]

Basically(or literally) China in WW2

[@flyinkiwi01]

That was a Russian strategy in the battle of Stalingrad when they were squeezed into small beach head. Charge soldiers forward (only a few had weapons) and try to deplete enemy munitions. Pretty grim stuff.

[@KikogamerJ2]

I like that strategy

[@looinrims]

China and Soviet Union in any war, because tactics/operations/strategies are hard

[@boblaryson3621]

I think the north Korean strategy is mass civilian casulities with chemical and bioweapons lnto border cities like Seoul. The military has no chance of taking on the south In open combat so that is what leads me to this thinking

[@odim7960]

Why would North Korea nuke its own people? You know that both Koreas speak the same language, have the same culture, ancestry, etc etc. They don't want to mass murder their people

[@svenandersen]

@@odim7960 you mean SK right? Who the hell too want to nuking it's own people, if you say like that then explain me why NK attacking it's neighbour SK first & still not officially ending it's war only signing armistice agreement until today. Not to mention various repeated missile test and how they treated it's own people too..

[@dantheman3022]

yeah just 1 nuke in soul will be enough to evacuate the entire city. He didnt talk about nuclear fallout which would devastate them. Add in 1 or 2 bioweapons and no one will stay in soul to make it an effective city. This in turn will cut the economy and manufacture base of the south by a half, if not more since the other cities inhabitants will not want to be next for a nuke.

[@clorkmagnus]

NKR use civilians as hostage to held up its country via the threat of nuclear weapons. If they are ever to be used, it will be a mass catastrophe to both S and N Korea. N Korea will very likely to be under heavy military intervention from China and US. I don’t think China would take lightly from a vassal who can throw nukes for ambitious reasons. As for S K allies, they will force to intervene if they don’t wanna risk the allies collapse. If they don’t act, what is the value of being allies?

[@Cam-zb7ut]

You see they can’t nuke Seoul because American troops are stationed there and the Americans would declare war and nuke them it’d be suicide for North Korea

[@Scylon1]

I have my doubts how effective their nukes would be. If they land and blow up sure, but making it to targets would be hard. Binkov himself said out of the 60 they have, only a few can even be fired like that. The further into the south they go, the less chance it will actually impact.

[@sushilsharma4202]

Actual devastation can only be seen during an actual fight. We don't know what NK might use during war and when will it use. Since the country has nukes the sensitivity of them using it early would be pretty high.

[@Spuggky45]

Not to mention the abysmally poor accuracy of N. Korean SSMs. A bunch of those, like the FROG missiles, would be lucky to hit the right province as its target, let alone the actual target itself.

[@Jarod-vg9wq]

South Korea has I believe in its advantages, higher quality training facilities and exercises, better leader training, higher quality food and exercise for its soldiers, and this is very important Combat experience, South Korea 🇰🇷 has lots of modern combat experience form the Vietnam war and various UN peacekeeping missions.

[@willappleton6078]

Not sure the Vietnam War counts as modern war experience.

[@nimbusnimbus.IV.]

I doubt theres any soldiers left from the Nam days

[@looinrims]

@@nimbusnimbus.IV. naval warfare experience from the 40s is still studied by relevant forces

[@override367]

I remember an interview with a NK special forces officer who escaped to the west, and he said "It's not just that I think (the west) could defeat us (north korea) in a war, I think that Americans armed with North Korean weapons would defeat North Koreans armed with American weapons"

[@looinrims]

@@override367 that seems imposing but frankly idiots equipped with tanks and rifles wouldn’t really do a lot against smart/experienced soldiers with handguns, if you catch my drift There’s a reason casualties for coalition forces in various interventions are so low, cuz idiots can’t aim their AKs

[@AirShark95]

Just some suggestions to consider (just making one of these would be awesome!) Japan vs S. Korea Chile vs Peru (kinda want to really see this one) Thailand vs Malaysia Israel vs Turkey (or Saudia Arabia) Russia vs EU China vs India Germany vs Switzerland Japan vs Russia Brazil vs Venezuela UAE vs Qatar Algeria vs Morocco AND... Retro War Scenario: USSR vs NATO (1983) - would be cool to see too.

[@Panda-Face]

AirShark95 Israel vs Turkey would be amazing

[@soundslikeskrillex9799]

AirShark95 Serbia vs Albania

[@dantewar2406]

Egypt vs Israel would be more logical

[@lukamesarovic9922]

SERBIA VS ALBANIA

[@SW-fk3rb]

Germany vs Switzerland rofl. Protip: Never fucking invade Switzerland. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Morgarten

[@ico9005]

_Did you win the war?_ South korea: yes. _What did it cost?_ South korea: North korea shred my cities down to its last atom.

[@MartinLeong25]

Tbh south korea is kind of stupid to have its capital city so close to its enemy

[@MartinLeong25]

@The Space sure that may be a historical city but south korea for thier own safety must move down south for a while like to busan :D

[@Alpha-eg8ip]

Martin Leong This little kid doesnt know about seoul's geograpic advantage and pollitical meaning

[@MartinLeong25]

@@Alpha-eg8ip sure it may be a historical city but currently its too near to the neighbour Maybe a tempoary move would be good for people to be safe

[@user-umop23erty]

@@MartinLeong25 yeah just like you could move the capital like it's some kind of caravan camp

[@MrKbtor2]

So much more detailed than the speculation I always hear in the media but have always questioned. Well researched, well presented. Well done!

[@looinrims]

Actually done by someone who knows about military matters rather than Starbucks veterans just repeating communist propaganda

[@massineben7198]

this why binkov is better than any other camparisation channel. researched, well delivered, and neutral. Hope this channel goes big

[@zproductions7053]

Ok, so I've watched a few of these before and enjoyed them. At a time when I was much more sober and less cynical, I enjoyed these and now I seem to respect them much more. The research and the thought gone into these is just amazing. Knowing the military forces on each as well as the nuclear knowledge is fantastic. I'm ecstatic that you are doing so well on YT and hope you only get bigger than this.

[@X1GenKaneShiroX]

I’m surprised not a lot of people talk about this, do a USA Vs Europe Compare USA to Europe Military

[@X1GenKaneShiroX]

Possert74 But I can predict that USA can Fuck Europe real hard, Yeah USA can make Europe it puppet. From what I heard USA got the Strongest Military

[@rsrs3630]

X1 Gen KaneshiroX Okay yes our military is strong but you don't have to make immature jokes and shove it in their face dumbass.

[@dimwitsixtytwelve]

Europe isn't a single country though so you have countries like the uk, france and Germany that have good armies whilst there are lots of smaller countries that cannot compete.

[@timmiekat6072]

X1 Gen KaneshiroX USA has a better army due to our stupid european leaders that decided it was a good idea to cut all millitary budgets but would they start investing aigan i think if europe would work as 1 country we can start European self made weapons are very effective so equal to us weapons example even though the m1a2 might be a little better then leopard2a7 it couldnt win a 2v1 since the leopard 2a7 is half the price as of now the EU has a slightly bigger economy and twice the population its infantry forces are larger already with equal 3.5% gdp spending i would say europe but we are allies and what do you guys think its still an interesting topic

[@X1GenKaneShiroX]

Trevor Phillips I apologise, I saw a lot of videos like these and the comment sections are like war zone. People brag about how good the country are sometimes. Sorry I’ll not do the immature thing again

[@castleai9551]

Support South Korea from UK 🇰🇷🇬🇧

[@マレ帝国の肉便器]

I love UK 👩‍❤️‍👨👩‍❤️‍👨 from SK

[@joelp7665]

@@マレ帝国の肉便器 South Korean weeb

[@joemamayiursobadiamepicyoy8170]

K pop fucking sucks man....

[@NizarZxe]

@@joemamayiursobadiamepicyoy8170 Kpopers plastic

[@youto8160]

South Korea defends free democracy. China and North Korea should disappear.

[@amaccabianjanissary5011]

Just in case , we are ready for an other war. Respect and Love for my brother land S.Korea

[@tinman1843]

One problem with this analysis is that South Korea's army size includes the US being there. If the US was to pull out, South Korea would increase the size & power of it's military.

[@simoc24]

Tinman 18 exactly :) South Korea has both the means and funds to develop an army twice the size with nuclear capacity with just couple years, if US move out. South Korean can get nukes, declare its survival depends on it, like India vs Pakistan, and careless what UN says

[@JZ909]

I don't think South Korea would change its military all that much. If North Korea can employ nukes effectively, a larger South Korean military isn't going to help a whole lot. If North Korea can't employ nukes effectively, the current South Korean military would crush North Korea's military pretty easily. Instead, I think South Korea would work to counter the North Korean nuke threat, and to be frank, they're already doing it. Their 3 new destroyers will be BMD capable and I'd be surprised if their older 3 don't get upgraded to the same (or better) standard at some point. Also, they're developing a higher altitude ballistic missile defense system to fill the gap between naval SM-3s and Patriot PAC-3s, probably to take over for the U.S. THAAD that is already in country. As for the low altitude threat. Outside of a surprise attack, when there aren't combat aircraft in the air, I think it's overstated. The vast majority of North Korean aircraft and air defenses are better described as historical artifacts than combat systems. In a big, complicated war, maybe some stuff slips through, but I have my doubts even about that. The employment method most likely to succeed is probably some sort of nuclear mine, but while that may end an invasion, it's not going to win the war.

[@kevinshaw3675]

What about North Korea vs South Korea and Japan

[@appa609]

@@simoc24 it takes like 5 years to ramp up domestic hardware production.

[@horstnietzsche1923]

Well it also underestimates just how bad the logistic situation in North Korea is especially if we take China out of the mix.

[@bustead2]

I remember seeing North Korean MiG-21 over Pyongyang back when I went to NK. I am pretty sure that they are still working on "improving the design", at least that's what I was told.

[@RAKITHA9]

bustead2 the mig 21s will be canon fodder to protect their suicide bomber aircraft

[@kanerises9526]

That would be like improving the T-55 or T-62. It might be better than the default standard, but it would not help them in a war against the U.S. and S.K.

[@bustead2]

Yeah well I did go to NK a few years ago as a tourist. So yeah, not the proudest thing I have done.

[@argusthefallenangel6135]

bustead2 did u go to NK

[@bustead2]

argus the fallen angel Yes. I did go to NK a few years ago

[@Master-il1sk]

binkov: “marginal north korean victory” me who lives in seoul: “fk”

[@SC-lc5wg]

Don't worry 🇺🇸&🇯🇵 got your back :)

[@robertevbayekha6639]

@@SC-lc5wg but what happen it on it own huh?

[@delta2372]

bright side is that I doubt that the north will resume the war (the Korean war never ended as no treaty was signed) however though I also doubt Korea will ever renunify either

[@johnslade9751]

Don't worry it's just a scenario, either way 🇺🇸 has your back! Kpop and Kdramas will not die on our watch

[@kdkdkdkiddkjxixixixii2424]

Love south Korea 🇰🇷

[@playc.holder6432]

What a great channel, sweet intro too.

[@canonethunderxnaturaldisas8084]

I'd say south will win because south have a well fed troops instead of North, they're forced to do war without food being fed to them and North Koreans might rebel/escape from NK when the war broke out cuz of dictatorship and that would give the south an advantage.

[@kohkisparten117]

Jason Maxmilan hey, maybe we can bribe them with food lol?.

[@canonethunderxnaturaldisas8084]

kohkisparten 117 yes,to join the south

[@kohkisparten117]

“Free cookies for any North Korean who leaves their military and joins us!!!!”😂😂😅😅

[@soonmeme4378]

German soldiers had food good paying wages and seen how well Hitler did for the country. In NK they are starving 24/7 and many see through the brainwashing and escape to the rest of the world. They can try to fight without food but they will starve to death or collapse not able to push into SK. North Korean soldiers also dont have better IQ, Technology, Leadership, and Generals that the Wehrmacht had. NK would be destroyed by any army and the only thing that might be able to save them but probably not would be China.

[@emptybrainzzz8738]

Though they are well fed and are supported by the US, they are still out numbered and out guned

[@AlexMappingHD]

North Korea VS Japan Russia VS NATO Mexico vs USA Italy VS France Spain VS France

[@alexandrualex1085]

Alex Mapping HD salut :-)

[@AlexMappingHD]

ALEX arl44 sall xd

[@FSA490]

Alex Mapping HD North Korea VS Japan=North korea win(with nuke) Russia VS NATO=NATO win Mexico vs USA=USA win Italy VS France=France win Spain VS France=France win

[@rodrigoduarte5893]

México vs Usa ....lol México no change

[@gerardlevaar6766]

North Korea VS Japan = If no nukes, Japan, if nukes, North Korea but barely. Russia vs NATO = USA alone can defeat Russia, add other superpowers called NATO then it should be easy for NATO. Mexico vs USA = USA Curbstomps the ever living fuck out of Mexico. Mexico can't even control drug cartels. Italy vs France = Very interesting matchup. I'd say France Spain vs France = France probably.

[@bakerhalt]

0:06" Hello there i, commander Binkov present to you"

[@PhilGarryGame]

Vietnam vs Thailand

[@rezwan2526]

Joseph Stalin .the indochina nations vs Thailand and Burma .

[@mcfragger2605]

Thaiand wouldnt last more than a year, their army is literally meant only for coup de tat

[@gechzboi8972]

indochinese vs thailand myanmar and malaysia 3v3 is very fair

[@emiriye]

*Vietnam.* *If Vietnam is good at something it's **_war!_*

[@gechzboi8972]

Thus they don't fight themself for the stupid thing like us in thailand

[@NobbsAndVagene]

Do Japan vs. a bowl of Ramen

[@FLJuJitsu]

The Ramen wins and being a Weeb becomes mandatory.

[@jhy56]

this is kind of funny topic. actually south korea has ability to make nuke as you can see south korea is one of the best countries using nuke energy for energy sources. but can't make nuke weapon since south korea are not like north korea because they are in position where they can lose alot by having this weapon. north korea has nothing to lose so they are not even hearing what all developed countries says to give up that nuke weapon

[@allahsklpd4866]

North korea is best

[@Vict0r1984]

They need the nukes because of American aggression as a deterrent. Your country is already under America's sphere of influence, so of course you do not need them...

[@faristaj2326]

@@allahsklpd4866 You're an Indian, aren't you? Explains the stupidity.

[@JJJ00-12]

rahul pancholi we don’t hate India. There’s no reason that S.korea hate india. Annually India buy millions of dollar worth of Military equipment and also Korean companies invest tremendous money in India. I don’t understand why you hate India because you think korean hate you guys. But i can tell you that we don’t have any aggresive feelings to India

[@allahsklpd4866]

Skinner it's truly said that a stupid things that whole world is stupid like him ... all arabian urdu islamic texts said that korea is a country of stupid

[@andrewsong6568]

Binkovs da man. Always fun to watch what if videos.

[@Reskov]

Kazakhstan vs Whole World

[@CristeroFanatic]

Borat would lead Kazakhstan to victory

[@CousinJesse1]

It would take the whole world versus the famous Kaz boxer/apex predator GGG just for it to be a fair fight hahaha

[@borat4856]

its nice I like very much Kazakhstan would win against everyone..... high five

[@frankkelio4010]

Kazakhstan beats world, new Horde appears !!!!

[@dingdingdingding5544]

Reskov I think it's safe to say we would be bowing down before our central Asian masters by the year's end if that scenario occured.

[@yesyes2397]

1960s Warsaw Pact vs NATO Please like I really want to see this one 😁

[@Infernal_Elf]

Yeah that would be amazing but the amount of research Required is Mind boggingly big.

[@chrisgaming9567]

If nukes are allowed, NATO wins a marginal victory. If not, the WP conquers all of mainland Europe

[@chrisgaming9567]

Not in the 60s.

[@chrisgaming9567]

thebulletin.org/nuclear-notebook-multimedia

[@chrisgaming9567]

Because Russia's conventional forces were too vast for even the western nuclear arsenals at the time, I think. If 4000 nukes can take out an average of 2000 WP personnel each, that still leaves the red army with millions more.

[@lapa8474]

Sweden vs Finland Croatia vs Serbia USA vs Canada Chile vs Bolivia Romania vs Hungary

[@Salt-Upon-Woundss]

Finland wins by default.

[@Salt-Upon-Woundss]

@Enclave Officer 117 You mean greater Alaska?

[@ubisons6161]

North Korea doesn't even have enough food to give them to the soldier Support South Korea from Turkey

[@ryanv2324]

their food crisis ended at least a decade or 2 ago bro, also all their troops have extensive military training while SK would mostly rely in the short term on their current standing army. I would also argue NK troop moral would start off in a higher state.

[@terrybang]

@@ryanv2324 yeah their food crisis ended, that's why north koreans try to run away to south korea/china, and that's why they are short and very skinny, and it's also why their average lifespan is much shorther than south korea

[@pascal9055]

@@terrybang lol. Yeah, this. It's interesting how people try to defend countries that have people running away from them like it has the plague. How many South Koreans run into North Korea, for "refuge"?

[@dfgh292]

@@pascal9055 well i guess noone wants to live in a country which being in blockade by virtually everyone in order to starve them to death like in medieval times.

[@HemlockRidge]

@@ryanv2324 Have you seen a NK ration? Also, "start off at a higher rate" , yeah, OK, they know nothing. They will get an education very quickly.

[@водка-х6з]

sweden vs finland

[@водка-х6з]

nah sweden is gay as fuck

[@dr.catherineelizabethhalse1820]

Interesting fight though it would be obvious that Finland is stronger. But I doubt that either can succesfully take over the other.

[@blankblank6545]

водка Yeah who's airforce is the gayest huh!

[@TheHahanicevideo]

водка would be boring war in forest, both countries lack power projection and shitty terrain

[@mickeyg7219]

Probably ended up like Norway vs Sweden video, although it's possible that Finland is more militarized because of its proximity to Russia, but Sweden has a strong domestic arms industry though.

[@haderzon1818]

England vs Rest of U.K.

[@BritishEmpireV2.0]

Haderzon Wales is buggered then

[@Yamifira]

scots will take over anglia and then proceed to ruin it

[@jaredbowhay-pringle1460]

The UK's nuclear arsenal is in Scotland, so I'm pretty sure they'd be safe. The rest of the country is largely irrelevant.

[@henryficklin7176]

How would we work that out? The UK only has one army. There aren't separate sets of troops and artillery for the separate kingdoms.

[@zacharyhoyte493]

Henry Ficklin probably based on where there are based like the highland regiments

[@chrisgaming9567]

CSTO vs NATO!

[@mickeyg7219]

EU vs Russia is currently at work, will be released in January. It's not quite NATO vs CSTO, but close enough.

[@mickeyg7219]

ZRB BG Collective Security Treaty Organization, basically military alliance between Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Serbia, and most of countries with names that ended with -stan.

[@zrbbg9639]

Mickey G Thanks.

[@lukamesarovic9922]

SERBIA VS ALBANIA

[@dde553]

EU isn't military aliance at all........

[@oliversherman2414]

I love your channel keep up the great stuff!!!!!!

[@aquilaFUN]

good analysis. still, I wonder how much the people in NK are actually devoted to the system. are they really brainwashed, or are they just waiting for a moment of weakness to stand up? there is no doubt that NK has horrible old and useless military material, but the sheer numbers of possible Partisans in that kind of difficult landscape would be a nightmare to fight against

[@makaramuss]

here is trouble: they dont know about outside too! its like that area has limited amount of enlightmend of human culture isolated is for both side. ruler making sure that knowladge is not going in as its not moving out people beliving burgers discovered by their ruler so you make the judge :D South korea ... lets say decided to make fun of Kim once. they decided to put many radio to border and started playing news :D North korea threatened with war if they dont stop it :P

[@Bobelponge123]

makaramuss apparently 70% are aware because smuggling of music and movies and 30% are influenced enough to dislike the government

[@Fenrir214]

That's not true most North Koreans know the truth, but they're tied down due to fear and sentiment. If a war breaks out I suspect many will defect during the process

[@joebevacqua62]

aquilaFUN v

[@gognamm2400]

Well good to see that this comment section have no Stalinist prising North Korea.

[@Tyler360]

kok namm Real socialists support the DPRK

[@yourlocalnazi1291]

Communism is a result of fat lazy fuck sticks

[@deltoroperdedor3166]

Free Speech supporting as in selling them some rice from time to time so they don't all starve to death?

[@gognamm2400]

Omar Rad Yep supporting one of the worst monarch in the world just because it's enemy of the US. The US might not be good but they're certainly better than North Korea.

[@gognamm2400]

Omar Rad Ohhhh trust me if they can they will, Every country will.

[@legitlazzer1877]

North Korea: spend millions and makes nukes to have more of an advantage instead of having tanks Belikov: WITHOUT NUKES

[@etherjoe505]

Good information in these vids but I wish the speed was about 1/2, with more explanation and context.

[@mikeheinlein3746]

Uhh you can decrease the playback speed yourself

[@quantumapex6169]

He will do Europe vs Russia next!

[@ferrymasters4156]

Annie Möff well it will be sucide for russia because if every country will work together america will help even with trump because the loss of Europe will mean a huge loss for economy in the entire world but if no one would work together it will be easy for russia...

[@ntf5211]

deze man stingy He said Europe vs Russia not US and the rest of NATO against Russia idiot.

[@ferrymasters4156]

kratos k want a sticker?

[@quantumapex6169]

deze man stingy What's a sticker? Do you mean snicker?

[@なめたけ星人]

Northkorea vs korea (=japan ) I have to defend my lover living in Korea with full power.

[@shastealyomeal]

Lol

[@mamoudououedraogo8425]

Kim will win 😁😁😂😁 u saw is New arsenal 🕳️🚀🚀☢️☣️☢️💣 is ready to blow up the earth

[@anemu3819]

@@mamoudououedraogo8425 you think north korea can win against Luxembourg? Your mind is delusional

[@elijahking728]

@@mamoudououedraogo8425 yeah okay, just wait till you have to fuck with the micronations.

[@rjpena6273]

Mannnn if japan attacks northkorea its gonna have a 3rd nuclear bombing!

[@gallasebiyo4427]

He should do this again in the next few years. Korea is building an arsenal ship, an aircraft carrier, as well as 9 more AEGIS destroyers.

[@darkchocolate1219]

Which korea?

[@dand3012]

i'v seen many of your videos. love your work! ty

[@JonSmith-yq1dw]

I've always wondered why the u.s. and South Korea mention that they know about the underground tunnels. Why wouldn't you just keep that a secret go in and put some type of explosives on support beams all through it and if a war happened wait until they have a decent amount of troops tanks a acps and other weapons going through the tunnel and just before they hit the other side explode all the ordinance.

[@derbolstein3277]

Jon Smith , the tunnels arent ment to bring tanks etc to south korea. They are meant for a retreat and hidden sneak attack. Like in vietnam. And to hide their nukes etc from radars, satelites etc.

[@kurousagi8155]

Joseph Stalin the North Korean tunnel system is supposedly vast and sophisticated. There are reports that large armored elements could use those tunnels to bypass the heavily mined front line.

[@1228carlito]

North Korea did make tunnels large enough to sneak entire Divisions of troops thru into South Korea. They were found in 1989. i remember my friends dad being mobilized from the US naval reserve to fast ship tanks to South Korea after the tunnels were found. Even the Russians and Chinese didn't know about them.

[@lyh0619]

Jon Smith the tunnels are heavily guarded by south korean troops

[@titus_philemon]

Brazil vs Venezuela!! 🇧🇷 vs 🇻🇪 PLS

[@titus_philemon]

🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

[@mickeyg7219]

It will be a logistical nightmare for both sides though, most major Brazilian cities are in the south, which works both ways.

[@slave7022]

Revolutionary Bastard not really.

[@Kunumbah1]

No brazil vs the rest of Latin America. Or Brazil vs USA to make it more fair.

[@islamischesozialistischear8953]

+Revolutionary Bastard they're not socialists.

[@iksenisrop8346]

6:47에 보면 북한 측에서 핵 전력을 안 쓴다고 가정할 때 남한이 당연히 이긴다고 결론을 냈음.그렇지만 그 이후에 북한이 핵 전력을 써야만 북한이 marginal victory(미미한, 의미없는) 승리를 거둔다고 했음. 결국 이 동영상은 남한이 이긴다고 설명하고 있음. 마지막 부분만 보고 북한이 이긴다는 말은 하지 마시길

[@Daniel23424]

NORTH KOREA THE BEST KOREA!!!🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵

[@Daniel23424]

@oFight 🇰🇷= 💩 🇰🇵 = 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻💪🏻💪🏻

[@coolguy3848]

@@Daniel23424 starving korea!!!

[@sakurachancn8246]

@@Daniel23424 poor Country North Korea. Just strong in Military.

[@mintyleafxd5982]

@@coolguy3848 if the north Korea is starving then why aren't millions of people dying of starvation

[@SingleBat]

Make a part 2 pls! With current capabilities

[@richardjamesgallardojr.7584]

Sudan vs South Sudan

[@mattbenz99]

South Sudan is literally a failed state. There is nothing they could do to defend themselves.

[@richardjamesgallardojr.7584]

mattbenz99 Reviews Not necessarily. The homies who rule in Khartoum went through four different leaders with the same promise: crush the people in the region now known as South Sudan. The three biggest tribes (and the ones that hate each other the most) are the Dinka, Nuer and the Merle. But they put their differences aside to frustrate Khartoum's attempts to crush them. For decades. The Dinkas in particular are considered a warrior tribe. The so-called "Zulus of East Africa". They chased the British off with their tails between their legs. They made the Arabs in Khartoum look like clowns. And the UN peacekeepers are proving unable to handle them. But give the 60 + tribes a reason to unite and they will be a force to be reckoned with. Just like before...

[@richardjamesgallardojr.7584]

mattbenz99 and the geologist speculate that South Sudan has the largest uranium deposits in the world yet another reason to go to war in the likelihood of War breaking out.

[@alarabi98]

Richard James Gallardo Jr. I mean the only reason they even got independence was with the blessings of the Sudanese government lol. Failed to mention that.

[@neegus7201]

Don't forget to add Kingdom of North Sudan

[@bassbuckmaster]

The low flying nuke plane scenario reminds me of Dr. Strange Love. " Ill drop that nuke even if it hairlips everyone at bear creek" funny movie

[@TheUltimateSheikh]

Comrade Binkov, California vs Texas please. I’m betting on Texas, but it would be an interesting fight.

[@donald8607]

Abdul Hakim Sheikh using National Guard and possible draft? I’d say money wins that fight.

[@AndrewAustinFrustrated]

Texas everytime California is a dump now with no war biggest movement would be all the Californians escaping the peoples republic of California add in the demoprats would want to outlaw all the firearms in California and its a foregone conclusion unless the demoprats continue their scam politics in which case Texas will be a new demoprat stronghold soon.

[@KayKimp]

5:36 South Korea came back heavy 😭

[@alperenaydogan5312]

Basicly Red Army Choir vs K Pop

[@sasailic2428]

Sound Korea win, from Turkey🇰🇷👬❤🇹🇷

[@zxcxzczx7142]

South olacak sound değil

[@user-dg7sp5jp5m]

I love Turkey, from South Korea🙋💗

[@winter413wind]

sound??

[@umutasik234]

I'love you south korea korean and Turkish Brothers 😍

[@JonSmith-yq1dw]

most of those tanks have a very short effective range on their main Cannon. Those K2 could sit there and pick off a couple every minute three times that distance or more and not have to worry about return fire. Plus that armors pretty weak on those pt-76 those things would get destroyed

[@_geck]

hey, i dont sympathize with nk or anything, but pt 76s can swim, they are bloody fast, and their lack of armor makes up in versatility. soviet tanks at their finest.

[@worldcollides4197]

That fa-50 fighters has brand new radar and amraam missiles.

[@joseleal5657]

God Bless (both) Korea... no more war... they are brothers

[@CaptainHaddocck]

Denmark Vs Sweden!!!

[@andydavis3075]

Captain Haddock Tho I think denmark is a great nation in warfare it is very weak.

[@Mark-xh8md]

Well, you're wrong :) As opposed to Sweden, not only do we have battle-hardened veterans (Iraq and Afghanistan), we have the entirety of NATO behind us. Should the Swedes attack, they'll get roflstomped.

[@malcolmbalane9142]

Mark P It's supposed to be 1v1. He said Denmark vs Sweden not Denmark and all of NATO vs Sweden

[@yourlocalnazi1291]

Sweden is cucked by Islam

[@cookietongs]

It’s 1520 all over again

[@carolyn6340]

Western vs eastern

[@BritishEmpireV2.0]

v7marz so world war 3

[@rishabh2885]

East win 😈

[@will.s4893]

East

[@TheLugzy]

We may have a part two on our hands

[@LAVATORR]

I totally understand that the point of this channel is to present a thought experiment devoid of external meddling or politics, but it's surprisingly hard to ignore the human aspect here. Would the North launch a nuke, knowing the consequences? I feel like it's virtually impossible to conceive of a 1-on-1 battle here.

[@LAVATORR]

thedorsa thestarting But again: While I understand this is a thought experiment that's trying to disregard the human factor, it feels like the real takeaway here is that this is a fool's errand. If the DPRK launched one nuke, let alone several dozen, every person involved in the chain of command is dead. Period. There's no scenario where Kim Jong Un or his generals launch a nuke and go back to running their country. And they know it. You can't shelf that because it's too big a hurdle to jump. It's like asking "if my aunt had bals, would she be my uncle?" You have to ignore so much of reality to even begin addressing the question that you might as well start fucking around with the quantity and quality of military hardware as well, getting those numbers wrong is far more likely than a cadre of self-interested sociopaths voluntarily signing their own death warrants.

[@Fenrir214]

It'll be used more like the COD MW scenario as a suicide option.

[@abseph1825]

Kim Jong Un wants to know your location

[@itsDavoBro]

Even without MMA I think the SK army still has the micro and macro advantage.

[@mcsnipes5384]

itsDavoBro but are you sure they don't require additional pylons

[@skipperson4077]

good but you missed an important anti-ballistic missile asset of South Korea, it's latest 'destroyer' (cruiser) class includes AEGIS radar and vertical launched anti-aircraft missiles with capabilities against both ballistic missiles and cruise missiles...X

[@aronjensen1766]

FBI: Hello sunshine, now Binkov tell us all secret millitary locations of North Korea

[@suleymankoc9298]

no winner north korea, winner country SOUTH KOREA love korea from turkey 🇹🇷🇹🇷❤🇰🇷🇰🇷

[@이정한-x2p]

Good

[@superfranek62]

no north korea would win u stupid democracy pig

[@mgastudios5076]

@@superfranek62 win with what exactly? Their shitty military technology from the 50’s?

[@superfranek62]

@@mgastudios5076 i mean they got nukes

[@mgastudios5076]

@@superfranek62 the entire goal of North Korea is to reunify with the south under the northern government. How is that gonna work out when the south is a radioactive waste land?

[@datascientist7580]

I love Korean war scenario without foreign intervention.

[@davidkariuki4785]

This guy's intro is the greatest.......

[@alvaro9238]

Morocco vs Spain

[@alarabi98]

Álvaro Pastor Merino Boi Do we really want to fight. Let's just have peace fam.

[@youssefakdim7695]

Not time to start a fight again

[@arandompersonlol1202]

Álvaro Pastor Merino spain wins easy

[@yoogamaulana6380]

@@alarabi98 .

[@kingdomofmontenegro2661]

Will you do montenegro vs kosovo please

[@atanasijesimic4651]

Go to his site and request it

[@kingdomofmontenegro2661]

Atanasije Simic can you give me the link pls

[@atanasijesimic4651]

Why would one nato puppet go to war against another nato puppet anyway

[@a.morphous66]

Being in an alliance does not make you a puppet. Why do I feel like this guy also supports the Zionist world government theory?

[@spyantreas]

if you have no idea of the history and the facts why this puppet countries exist then dont talk..

[@알고싶다그것이-f3z]

독도 색깔 칭찬합니다!

[@UncleFeedle]

It would certainly be an interesting war to observe, that's for sure. All those 1950's/60's-era planes going up against each other. F5's taking on MiG-17's in the 21st century - crazy!

[@razekaze39]

South Korea is true Korea because their flags are in accordance with Korean culture, while North Korea forget the peanut skin.

[@Ililillliiiliiiil]

Nazi germany is true germany Confederate States of America is true America Vichy France is true france

[@xertophilios3695]

i don't know whether the Korean guy is being sarcastic or not, but he needs a reality checkup

[@marcossebastian569]

I want Peru vs Chile Peru vs Ecuador Canada vs USA Pakistan vs Afghanistan Latvia vs Russia Venezuela vs usa

[@cxpKSip]

Peru vs. Chile... Peru win? vs. Ecuador... Ecuador win? Canada vs. USA: absolute curbstomping and win for USA

[@cxpKSip]

Pakistan versus afghanistan: Afghan Win Russia vs. Latvia: CURBSTOMP and Russia win

[@궁예-q8e]

Binkov's Battlegrounds vs NATO

[@lithentondanarian8982]

I agree with this scenario, all except for 1 point. The Size of the North Korean Army, most of it like you stated is comprised of conscripts, true, however if North Korea violated the ceasefire with South Korea and reignited the war with them, you'd probably see alot of mutiny as morale in North Korea is not that great thanks to decades of sanctions, militarized opression, forced labour etc etc. Youd probably be looking at a 1/4 or maybe a 1/3 of their forces turning on the North Korean regime, so not also would they be fighting a technologically superior military with greater capabilities and power projection they would also be trying to tackle a pretty large scale civil war and because most of the people fighting will have military training, courtesy of the regime itself, youd be looking at a very rapid defeat for North.

[@gordonblues843]

When life seems harsh I must remind myself I don't work on a North Korean submarine,

[@CousinJesse1]

I mean this is implying that North Koreas nuclear missiles and bombs don't explode in flight, or on their launch platform. I hear they have a 60% failure rate in missile launching. And lets just say they have 100 nukes. By that number only 40 are workable. Of those 40, how many will be subject to successful anti-measures? How many will actually hit their intended target? Accuracy of the weapons is another concern for North Korea. But Binkov, you are forgetting two other important factors as well - North Koreas stockpile of chemical and biological weapons. How do they affect the battle? And how long does this war last until there is a clear victor?

[@Alpha-eg8ip]

Jesse James SK also have Bio and Chemical weapons with massive missiles. we spend lots of budjet for fire power.

[@CousinJesse1]

송강수 The bio/chem weapons still weren't factored in either way

[@boredmewcat3514]

Jesse James I think this is only when everyone uses conventional weapons. It will not be fun if MDWs are usen in this kind of videos.

[@kanerises9526]

The only thing Chemical and Bio weapons would do for NK is turn the entire world against them, even China

[@1barnet1]

In the eyes of North Korea the whole world is already against them. Which isn't far from the truth either. Which is a bit their own doing don't get me wrong. So what would change? The only thing preventing a US excursion in the name of democracy is the common sense that in that event south Korea is done for. Which has been the case for a long time.

[@neverluckym8728]

North Korea needs some Freedom™

[@neverluckym8728]

Layth Alkhaer It's good Iraq got it because now America and Russia learned to work together. (Yes I know there were some bad parts..)

[@nelsonhong3682]

Nord Korea don't need some freedom there just need too serander or die

[@yokek647]

Never Lucky m8 USA needs freedom.

[@ClubofInfo-Circulation]

Iraq got its Freedom™ from Iran, and eventually Israel will get daily free shots of Freedom™ once the Freedom™ bomb supply is improved. Israelis will be waving their arms a hundred feet in air with Freedom™

[@donalds2ndaccount323]

Never Lucky m8 but they starve there people like stallin

[@sonar357]

Let's remember, though, the reason for NK invading SK would be to take over their industrial and economic base. SK is an economic powerhouse and a 'hostile takeover' (literal and figurative) would be the objective for the North. If they were to use nukes against SK's industrial centers and economic centers (such as Busan) it would defeat the whole purpose. Also, NK can barely feed its own population (25.3 million vs SK's 51.4 million) so using nukes on SK would make the famine situation that much worse not to mention there being even less livable space due to irradiated areas. So, assuming NK being logical (a stretch), they wouldn't use nukes except in selective tactical employment. But then they'd risk, as you said, getting other powers involved (possibly with nukes of their own). The best use of nukes for NK would be as EMP delivery systems. An EMP would cripple much of SK's military forces while leaving the more obsolete NK forces relatively unscathed. But, again, the EMP would do even greater damage to SK's economic and industrial power centers, thereby negating the reason NK has for invading and taking over SK.

[@simoc24]

sonar357 you are thinking with logics, logically they will never go to war. The only reason to go war is because Kim has nothing else to loose, either local uprising or some generals revolt that he cannot control. He will go to war just to change attention for the sake of survival, knowing he will lose but can live 2 or 3 weeks longer, hell with millions dying around him, he won’t care.

[@appa609]

They wouldn't start the war. North Korea has nukes as a deterrent to preserve the state's power. If they didn't have them I have no doubt Americans would have invaded and toppled the government by now.

[@ronaldvantine4488]

How many of the North Koreans would desert?

[@beyblade9001]

Well how on earth do you know the military weapons of a country that doesnt publish them?(im talking about north korea) anyways awesome video, as always

[@massineben7198]

beyblade9001 i fear that he is a soviet spy

[@beyblade9001]

Fliyo MB lol

[@nottoday3817]

You can get those numbers from Russian or Chineese sources. Altough you can never have the complete arsenal, it's unlikely to be a huge difference

[@dantrusty1259]

Exactly. And nukes don't even exist. It's like saying that the horseshit that CNN puts on the TV is real. Its all deception and propaganda decade after decade. This channel is a joke.

[@massineben7198]

your reply is a joke

[@francescogerminiasi]

AUSTRIA VS ITALY!! THAT'S GONNA BE VERY INTERESTING

[@dillydilly3680]

Francy germi Italy would win

[@francismartin6141]

Let's get revenge

[@nottoday3817]

I would go with Italy. They have a bigger country, and I also believe a better army. Also, Italy is one of the clients for F-35s. That plane might be a flying turd, but it's better than the US planes european countries operate

[@francescogerminiasi]

TheVincent37 ahahah no, I'm from Italy

[@cyberavenger8668]

they are now.......

[@NativeVsColonial]

8:27 What was that Voice! :0

[@ot9ot735]

Kim Jong Un watching this: Aight, ight, noted.

[@deveshtiwari4942]

india-china

[@standardobserverstandardob6072]

South Korea Victory North Korea Marginal Victory

[@geminiapollo2319]

Do Germany vs Russia (Modern-day)

[@arandompersonlol1202]

Gemini Apollo Germany would win pretty easily (NATO)

[@Jack29245]

Of course they would with NATO but as usual, no allies are modelled and so this would certainly be an interesting showdown.

[@arandompersonlol1202]

Vicky Illingworth making a vid with noone germany and russia (1v1) wouldnt be logical, i mean NATO hates Russia, so they wouldnt let germany all alone right??

[@Jack29245]

This isn't required to be logical. If it was then America would have joined South Korea in this video. The rules for all scenarios are clear no allies.

[@arandompersonlol1202]

Vicky Illingworth but it would be more entertaining WITH allies right

[@훈닥터스]

hello i am South korean we're have the peace we're don't war I already have a lot of pain from the Korean War in 1950. We do not want to fight with North Korea. We want to be united and for peace I want to live (Thank you very much for reading my essay. I hope my poor English is helpful at least.)

[@CMDRFandragon]

Korean war 2 would not go NK way. The modern SK is not the 1950s force. They have modern tanks, planes, US backing and training. Yeah....

[@redreaper5083]

SK are Gay

[@darrenbloomfield8296]

@@redreaper5083 of course they are happy they live in a free country not a failed communist state.

[@kryndude]

@@redreaper5083 no homo

[@cramarc3058]

If democrats win the elections and NK started the war with a fake SK attack notification as an excuse it would mean that China would get implicated and pussy Democrat US wouldn't dare to get in the war and crush against China. Even more if NK used their nuclear weapons

[@gabenewell3955]

@@darrenbloomfield8296 they are big gay fems they ain’t winning

[@BERTAN3000]

South Korea has 5 million reservs

[@TerminatorekTT8000]

Poland vs Ukraine

[@Christian-ee7no]

unpossible.

[@ЖеняКраснослободцев-р3е]

poland and ukraine will never go to war

[@flutterfly420]

ahaa like Ukrainian folks will succeed where a century of others didnt. oki

[@one.two.three.]

Many people overlook this fact. The difference in military power between South Korea and North Korea is so great that S.Korea can occupy North Korea in one day. But North Korea has nuclear and that's hindering our unification.

[@looinrims]

It’s more so that big fat Winnie the Pooh led nations across the sea that’s hindering unification

[@nilkuan4199]

Korea versus Korea, uh oh

[@slups8465]

Greece VS Italy

[@arandompersonlol1202]

Slups italy wins no doubt, greece's military sucks and they are in crisis, no way they can win

[@vasileios6301]

+a random person lol Greece will never have war with Italy again,we are strong allies. In one war we had,we won with much worse military,learn history moron.

[@arandompersonlol1202]

Vasileios LOL 1919-1922 Turkey VS Italy, France, UK, Greece, Armenia. guess who won? yeah, Turkey won so forget your 'good' military

[@vasileios6301]

+a random person lol Had has Turkey to do with Italy vs Greece I dont know.

[@arandompersonlol1202]

Vasileios speak english please...

[@bustead2]

Nuclear war is more awesome? Damn Binkov you need to chill

[@MajinOthinus]

It *is* more *awesome* (as in awe-inspiring) , doesn't mean it's a good thing......

[@michaelsevren2287]

That's not a bad choice of words. Your parents just made a bad choice in schools.

[@bustead2]

Well I am not the brightest kid, I admit that.

[@kaelum1210]

The fact that you chose to push your ego aside and not argue means that you're probably brighter than most kids your age. I wouldn't worry too much

[@marcvsahlal-khatwa5460]

Kaelum1210 he actually used the word ‚fantastic...

[@daniel3231995]

This just suddenly became a very real scenario in june 2020 good luck world war 3