Could convicted killer Scott Peterson get a new trial? | Dan Abrams Live

[@aok4418]

AMERICAS MOST WANTED TIP Four days after Steven Todd and Glenn Pearce were arrested, America’s Most Wanted ran a story on Laci’s disappearance. An anonymous call came into their hotline. We refer to it as the AMW tip. The caller said he had a conversation with two men who were bragging about Laci’s murder. The second man was unnamed, but the tipster gave a description and knew where the second individual lived. It was reported that the first man said “when they did it they thought it was going to be just another murder case . . . now it’s a big case all over TV and news . . . and they are blaming the husband and they are not getting any attention.” went on to say how stupid everyone was. The caller went on to say that he knew where the first man lived with his mother; his mother has the same last name. The last name is worth mentioning because four days earlier, the Modesto Police had encountered the Mother. She was present at her neighbor’s home when police came looking for the Medina’s stolen property. There was a strong connection between the Doe family and burglar Steven Todd. Certainly, this would merit follow-up, especially since the AMW operator stated this caller was 100% sure. Unfortunately, the extent of their follow up was this: This tip was given to a Modesto police officer, the same officer that encountered the mother four days earlier. This officer drove to the sons house, which was one block away from where he had encountered the mother, four days earlier. The son was standing outside. The officer confirmed his identity and asked where he was on December 24th. He said he was “locked up.” The officer called the jail and a deputy confirmed that John Doe had been in jail on the 24th, so the officer did not ask any other questions. The tip did not say he had murdered Laci, the tip just said “they did it.” It is not clear at all who “they” are. However, the officer asked no more questions. The officer never asked why it would be reported that he was bragging about the murder of Laci Peterson; whether he knew anything about Laci’s whereabouts; or about his mother’s connection to the Medina burglary. It was recently verified the first man WAS NOT IN JAIL during December of 2002. The deputy that had confirmed he was in jail had used an intake document that only estimates an inmate’s jail stay, it was not updated once he was released. The MPD screwed up big time.

[@Snipergetstitches]

Never getting out!

[@aok4418]

@@Snipergetstitches We shall see. I love how you spent 6 years researching this case, yet you can't spell Laci.

[@MsRotorwings]

They should’ve never let Scott Peterson off death row. I have no hope for California if he even has a remote chance for a new trial. Shame on the Innocence Project for taking this case. There are actually innocent people in prison that deserve their services.

[@lightyagami3492]

Clearly the innocence project saw something wrong with the case otherwise they wouldnt have taken it. Ill wait to see how this goes before saying it was a bad move.

[@MsRotorwings]

@@lightyagami3492 Nah, someone at the Innocence project owed Geragos a favor. It’s about politics.

[@aok4418]

What favor was that...

[@cynthiawagner2415]

California no longer has death row. They plan on shutting down San Quintan prison.

[@lug.5329]

@@MsRotorwings , It's the LA Innocence Project.

[@heatherbragg3284]

Way to go, Liz! ❤

[@NadineHiestand-n7n]

Liz is the best! Great move Fox

[@vincedidiana5781]

Where’s Geragos?

[@sophie8394]

​@@InLieuTube😂😂😂😂😂

[@aok4418]

YES, There is new evidence, you test it. You do what you need to do if there is evidence.

[@lug.5329]

and if it's not what the defense thinks it is? more testing. the peterson fanboys and fangirls are sad jokes.

[@aok4418]

@@lug.5329 Hi, Valerie

[@lug.5329]

@@aok4418 hi, someone-who-hates-English-as-a-second-language

[@lug.5329]

@@aok4418 who is Valerie? I thought I was supposed to be Sophie. Hahahaha

[@aok4418]

@@lug.5329 That makes no sense. But, okay.

[@ErinMDavis05]

LIZ!! Cups up!!

[@ThatsMyBlackOpinion]

Huh??

[@ThatsMyBlackOpinion]

@@InLieuTube Try having some manners.

[@taraann1234]

This the weirdest timeline. I want out

[@thomascorona2933]

How many times have we seen people spend many years in prison only to be innocent. I think because of the advances in DNA testing all cases that 20-30 years old and still have material that could be tested, they should at least retest! Put it to bed permanently!

[@Silence_Duder_Gooder]

Chris Hansen: "We watched how this all played out." Yeah, Chris, we did. And from JUMP, Nancy (dis)Grace pegged Peterson as "guilty!" 🙄 That, to me, along with a few other factors, makes me think potential jurors were tainted before they even knew they'd be jurors. The fervor around this case _alone_ seemed like a witch hunt. All of the pomp and circumstance that surrounded the courthouse as the trial date drew closer was _pure spectacle._ People, like Chris, love to say, "Oh, it's _so_ obvious he's guilty!" But I've seen cases where this was also the case. People said the very _same things_ that they're saying _right now_ about this Peterson case, only to later find out they were WRONG. Sure, Peterson may be guilty of the crime the state of California has alleged. But shouldn't we know _for sure_ if that's the case? I don't see a problem with making sure. Hell, I don't even like the guy! I think he's a smug, entitled sh*t! But that doesn't automatically make him guilty of this crime just because I feel that way about him. And a _lot_ of people used that sort of emotion-based "thinking" to judge this guy before he even got into a courtroom. And the very _same thing_ is going on currently with the Brian Kohberger case, and there's all _sorts_ of weird stuff all _over_ that case. Yet, we have people claiming they "know for sure he's guilty!" Yeah, we'll see... or maybe, we won't? 🤔

[@Time4destinychannel]

Do you see Odin video sharing of his story with the knowledge learned about oden. Another you tube video There was another 2story about Giants being found under the house. haven’t followed either of those stories to have any Information about it other than what the video’s share they were kinda different interesting perspective wouldn’t have thought about unless has those types of knowing. On different video see in one of the comment line’s that the house had similar address as the house in which the amityville horror story had happened. Don’t know anything further than what those individuals shared.

[@Silence_Duder_Gooder]

@@Time4destinychannel, are you sure you're replying to the correct post? I have _no idea_ of what you're referring. "Giants"? "Oden"? "Odin"?

[@lonelyheroine]

I'm encouraged that you have said that Peterson may be guilty, or may not be. I feel the same way. It's the individuals who state that he is unequivicably innocent and claim that anyone who disagrees must lack logical thinking skills and are driven purely by emotion are the ones that I find irritating and obnoxious . I have no idea whether or not this guy is innocent of his crime. Only Peterson knows for sure.

[@OolaHula]

Scott Peterson's choice of gear to go fishing for sturgeon in San Francisco Bay didn't suggest he wanted to catch anything. His pole was too small to catch a sturgeon.

[@ameliabedelia7018]

Stop with the sexual analogies and entendres

[@TSeeley01]

Was he an experienced fisherman? If so then that is of note. If not then perhaps like most people doing something unfamiliar they make mistakes that they hope to learn from.

[@OolaHula]

You clearly weren't paying attention or not born when this happened. Who leaves their pregnant wife and goes fishing on Christmas day if they know NOTHING about fishing as you imply? The discovery included 42,000 pages of documents. The evidence against Peterson included weeks of apparent planning, forensic evidence including mitochondrial DNA, and months of suspicious behavior both before and after the fact. Frey, the girlfriend he cheated on his pregnant wife with did not know Peterson was married; he had told her weeks before Laci’s disappearance that he had "lost his wife" before she was even dead. Laci's hair was found in the same boat Scott bought right before he "went fishing" coincidentally in the same region of the bay where her body was eventually found. Topping it off, they caught him fleeing with his hair dyed a different color and $10k in cash. If his wife had been murdered by someone else, why would he do that? I guess you have some reflecting to do and possibly some research of your own. @@TSeeley01

[@OolaHula]

The bodies of both mother and son washed up in San Francisco Bay, just a few miles from where Peterson had gone "fishing" the day Laci disappeared. BTW who leaves their pregnant wife on Christmas day to fish when they never fish?! Scott hadn’t had a regular fishing license since 1994! The original discovery included 42,000 pages of documents. The evidence against Peterson is overwhelming, this trial is a waste of time. Scott called his girlfriend, Amber Frey on Dec. 9, 2002, 15 days before Laci went missing, saying that he had "lost his wife" and would be spending his first holiday without her. Caught in a pair of pliers recovered from Peterson’s boat, police found hair matched to Laci’s through mitochondrial DNA testing. Do some research!

[@Fat12219]

Tuna

[@SavannahJ79]

Didn't Janey do work for the Innocence Project? You have to give it to her, she's made it her life's mission to get Scott out of prison. But the LA Innocence Project are going to very quickly realize that oops Scott is guilty and where he belongs.

[@aok4418]

Yes, because you must know more than the highly respected organization that has exonerated hundreds of innocent people.

[@SavannahJ79]

@@aok4418 Are you saying the LA Innocence Project has exonerated hundreds of innocent people? Or do you mean the Innocence Project? Cause there's a big difference and there's a reason why the Innocence Project is making sure we all know the difference, but back to you, so you're saying the LA Innocence Project has exonerated "hundreds" of innocent people?

[@aok4418]

@@SavannahJ79 The LAIP is part of the IP Network. 1 of 70 across that make up the organization. They started expanding in 2005.

[@aok4418]

@@SavannahJ79 Again, more ignorance on your part.

[@SavannahJ79]

@@aok4418Actually it's on your part. I distinguished between the Innocence Project and the LAIP. The Innocence Project stated that the LAIP was "wholly independent". Why did the Californian Innocence Project and the Innocence Project decline to take on his case? You mention the IP "network" and they are 1 of 70, did you take that from Wikipedia? Because they actually aren't listed as the 1 of 70. And they aren't mentioned in any of the affiliated companies mentioned.

[@victoriagrove5344]

I hope not. Expensive wasteful activity. He is guilty. I don’t care what material they get from analysis of the orange truck. It could do nothing to change what we all know based on the evidence.

[@DeniseC967]

Cups up Liz!!

[@ameliamargaret2058]

Totally .ludicris. Master liar. Innocence project has gone nuts

[@EmmaDee]

He SHOULD ABSOLUTELY GET A NEW HEARING!! Folks, as a victim of a violent assault many, many years ago (physical evidence proved without a doubt that my assailant was guilty, not the media, not circumstantial evidence, not because he was a cheater or Lord forbid a impartial juror)so I BELIEVE IN JUSTICE! Yet, there was NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE TO PROVE PETERSON KILLED HIS SWEET LIFE. I have no personal interest in this case, only believe NO ONE SHOULD BE SITTING IN JAIL IF THEY ARE INNOCENT

[@janethardy3208]

No no no no

[@dawnb3194]

I hope not!

[@tishwitch]

He's guilty and he needs to shut up and accept accountability. Innocent people don't lie about going golfing the day their very pregnant wife went missing. He's a psychopath.

[@Silence_Duder_Gooder]

People lie for all _sorts_ of reasons, and one of them is because of how they don't want to appear to the public. But that doesn't also mean he's guilty of murder, either. Look, the Modesto police said that Scott didn't want to be a father or a parent, and that's why he killed Laci. But if that's the case, then why did he choose to cheat on Laci with a woman, Amber Frey, who already had a kid, a boy, at that time? That makes _no sense_ whatsoever! But that's what the police's case was built on?

[@sophie8394]

​@@Silence_Duder_Gooderthat's not what the case was built on 😂😂 And Amber had a daughter.

[@tishwitch]

@@Silence_Duder_Gooder do you know where Scott actually went that day, instead if golfing? Fishing... on a boat he also kept secret, in the same water where they would eventually find Laci and Connor. He lied because the truth is, that day, he killed his wife and dumped her while "fishing".

[@Silence_Duder_Gooder]

@@tishwitch, he never kept that boat a secret, that's a lie. And I don't understand why fishing is a problem. He couldn't go golfing because of the inclement weather, and fishing during inclement weather is usually optimum fishing conditions. Yeah, I get the proximity of where he went fishing and where the bodies showed up. I'm not saying it doesn't look bad. But back to the boat lie (edited for content): _"When Scott purchased the boat from Bruce Peterson, he paid cash. Scott did not pay cash to hide the transaction; Scott paid cash because Bruce asked to be paid in cash. Scott withdrew the $1400 from his joint checking account with Laci._ _"Also, Scott did not try to hide his identity from Bruce or the DMV. Scott gave accurate information to Bruce including his home address. This information was filed with the DMV on 12-9-02._ _"Additionally, Scott had told the police that Laci knew about the boat and that she had been to the warehouse on December 20, 2002. Detective Brocchini was told about an eyewitness who confirmed seeing Laci at the warehouse (where the boat was stored). When he heard about this witness in August of 2003, he purposely left it out of his police report._ _"While under oath during the trial, he admitted to excising the information from his police report and acknowledged that he did not think it had been reported by any other officer. This woman later confirmed that Laci was at the warehouse on December 20, 2002. This situation confirmed that Scott was once again being truthful. It was Detective Brocchini who had been deceptive._ _"There is no evidence that Scott tried to keep the boat a secret. Testimony showed that Scott and Laci routinely made purchases and decisions that extended family members were not aware of. It had only been fifteen days since they bought the boat, it would be expected that not many people would be aware of it._ _"Scott never lied to anyone about having a boat. He discussed buying a boat with his friends, he used his own name to purchase the boat, and took the money out of a joint account with his wife. He immediately told the police on Christmas Eve that he’d been fishing and took them to his warehouse to show them the boat._ _"So the prosecution’s statement that ‘nobody knew about’ the boat was not true and to call the boat a ‘secret purchase’ was inaccurate."_ (source: ScottPetersonAppeal, _Top Ten Facts you need to know about Scott's boat')_

[@Silence_Duder_Gooder]

@@sophie8394, that's what the police _said_ was one of the reasons they thought Scott was guilty of this crime. Also, Amber had _two_ kids, one of them a boy named Justin. You _really_ need to do more research on this case if you're going to chime in about it. 🙄

[@lizzyfabulous8367]

I’m not fascinated by the LA innocence project but I’ll be waiting like the rest of y’all 🌹

[@Silence_Duder_Gooder]

Somebody should have asked Dan why he and Nancy (dis)Grace and others in the media kept lying about that alleged phone conversation between Scott and Amber when _they said_ that Scott said to her, *_"I didn’t do it but I know who did, and I’ll tell you later when I see you."_* That was never said, ever. There has never been any evidence found to suggest that there was ever that exact exchange between the two, yet, again, Dan and Nancy and other hacks kept promoting that garbage? Well, Dan, what say you? P.S. I'm putting this on *_full blast_* all _over_ the internet and elsewhere until you address it accordingly.

[@brennanhuff2960]

Dan also made an attempt to blackmail/strong arm Scott into doing an interview with him. It was caught on a wire tap. He’s a F’er.

[@DoreeseEveritt]

Oh yes it was Scott Peterson called that in

[@elizabethlacky6068]

This is all being driven Scott's sister-in-law Janey Peterson. If you listen to her " new" evidence, isnt new at all...He did it and he's where he belongs.

[@aok4418]

It is new. Stop lying.

[@Snipergetstitches]

@@aok4418 you need to stop trolling, you did enough trolling in the water when you dumped your wife’s body and killed your baby.

[@brennanhuff2960]

@@aok4418 Are you YouTubing from prison again, Scott? 😂🥴

[@aok4418]

@@brennanhuff2960 😆

[@SavannahJ79]

@@aok4418Name one thing that is new, never heard before evidence?

[@Snipergetstitches]

Scott is guilty, I studied his case for over 6 years. There is so much stuff that tv didn’t put out and cirumstantial evidence is just as powerful as DNA evidence. If the whole case was put out to the public people wouldn’t be questioning if he’s innocent….

[@Silence_Duder_Gooder]

So, what's your take on other evidence not allowed by the defense? Also, what's your take on how Nancy (dis)Grace handled this story from day one?

[@sophie8394]

​@@Silence_Duder_GooderNancy Grace lives in your head rent free. What evidence wasn't allowed?

[@TonyVega123]

I've written Scott for almost 20 years. He is the most loving, decent human being I have EVER spoken to. He would give you the shirt off his back. SCOTT IS INNOCENT AND HE WILL BE RELEASED!!!!

[@sophie8394]

@@TonyVega123 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Silence_Duder_Gooder]

@@TonyVega123, hey, did you get a, you know, conjugal out of it?

[@patrickbeck3285]

Guilty is guilty.

[@godzillamanstreb524]

Feel so bad for Laci’s mother….this is bs….he’s guilty as heck….this will die on the vine

[@Fat12219]

Poor lady n baby 🍼

[@Fat12219]

Guitar or not Mr Peterson has send so many years in prison 😮

[@karenarcuri]

Do you think it’s possible that the Peterson family donated us substantial amount to the innocence project for them to take the case?

[@sophie8394]

Yup.

[@ValleyoftheRogue]

Scott and the Menendez brothers. What is with all these guilty killers wanting to get yet another chance to get convicted?

[@lonelyheroine]

Don't forget Chris Watts.

[@steelhurricane4041]

Excise sir. SP is innocent.

[@sophie8394]

​@@InLieuTube 👏👏👏

[@dallasarne6588]

His sis n law is in love with him. She’s been focusing on him, not Laci and Conner. She hopes he gets out, and she’s his first. SICK!

[@brennanhuff2960]

What’s sick (and incredibly adolescent) is your mind going there. She’s known Scott since he was a kid. He’s like a brother to her. 🙄

[@timtapscott8737]

Well I watched the trial very very closely and I think no doubt he did it. BUT there wasn’t much concrete evidence pardon the pun. Yes the concrete anchors matched but come on. Where’s blood. Where did he kill her. How did he kill her. Can’t stand the guy. But it would have been hard for me as a juror to find him guilty of murder. Same with Casey Anthony. We all know she did it. But there wasn’t much actual evidence she did it.

[@commonsenseking6386]

Yes, me as well, the prosecution star witness was that loser, I have better names but let that go, this is a reverse of the case against the defendant that killed Brenda Schaefer in 1988.

[@sophie8394]

You watched a trial that wasn't televised? How did you manage that?

[@timtapscott8737]

@@sophie8394 followed. How’s that.

[@sophie8394]

@@timtapscott8737 more accurate.

[@jillmackie6012]

Peterson was found guilty by a jury. Good luck gathering jurors for future trials anywhere. Peterson loves the limelight!

[@Silence_Duder_Gooder]

Yeah, but by a clearly tainted jury.

[@sophie8394]

​@@Silence_Duder_Gooder😂😂😂

[@aok4418]

​@@InLieuTubeCasey A trial was moved to Clearwater, genius.

[@aok4418]

​@@InLieuTube They didn't convict OJ because they were making a statement against police corruption against black people. Yes, jurors even admitted this.

[@aok4418]

​@@Silence_Duder_GooderLooks like Sophie is stalking you. She's a little creepy.

[@marysmith3761]

Amber Frey wasn’t even attractive. I never understood why he would be attracted to her.