Vs S400 Series: MLRS vs S-400: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bpiki3uDoaiBfNk USN ToT Strike vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fqS1aKyknqlsi68 Kh-47M2 Kinzhal vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/epvGgqGoq7J7mKM Sweden & Star Wars vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWSTZISkobuipJI WWI, WWII & Stealth vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pIrahoR9pLSGq5o USAF 4th Gen Strike vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z6C0aXxmZaqhmaM Different USAF Bombers vs S-400: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l3TWk6KFfJWEi5Y
@Samsungnote-ip6gu2 жыл бұрын
Could you check DCS for Nuclear Fuse Detotonation timing and impact triggering.
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
OK
@Anarchy_4202 жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers Yo Cap check this out! Credible video that talks about The F-15EX, AIM-120D, and even briefly The Phoenix missile! I want you to see this bc he literally says range classified however information supports Exceeding* 100 miles-- kzbin.info/www/bejne/nYGteqOBbbBmjNU Lol as I've been saying closer to 120 miles 193 kilometers! I hope this helps persuade you to increase the range and other upgrades such as but not limited to more chaff/flares, more powerful engine's, and better fuel efficiency!😁✌
@Anarchy_4202 жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers The F-15EX isn't just a missile truck! F-15EX Eagle II has substantially more powerful mission computer, new cockpit displays, a digital backbone, and the Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System (EPAWSS)-- an electronic warfare and threat identification system! More Powerful Engine's that are also better on fuel! Plus it's a missile truck!😆 I really hope all of this information is being taken into account, far as how well the Plane is modeled! ;)
@adityatraders32752 жыл бұрын
9/11 bin laden stayed in pakistan , pak goverment AND ISI kept him safe for years
@alvaromartin11852 жыл бұрын
To answer your question about ground effect (Flight instructor here btw): Ground effect is essentially a product of wingtip vortices. As an aircraft produces lift, it will also produce wingtip vortices which we all know can cause wake turbulence. Well when an aircraft is within one wingspan above the runway, these wingtip vortices will create a “bubble” around the aircraft which reduces induced drag and allows an aircraft to produce much more lift at lower AoA. Thanks as always for the content Cap!
@alvaromartin11852 жыл бұрын
To clarify about the bubble analogy, the wingtip vortices basically bounce off the ground and literally create a bubble which reduces induced drag
@Madnot42 жыл бұрын
It's a little love cushion for us helicopter pilots
@Samsungnote-ip6gu2 жыл бұрын
Ground effect is half of the wing span (simply).
@alvaromartin11852 жыл бұрын
@@Samsungnote-ip6gu That’s where ground effect is maximized but it comes into effect up to a wingspan or less.
@TheCynicsCynic2 жыл бұрын
@@Madnot4 Love cushion lol
@justicethedoggo36482 жыл бұрын
There are already many links of MRSAMs and Akash missiles and many other missiles before they get to reach s400s .
@RCLepcha Жыл бұрын
Yep
@Kam07177 ай бұрын
In dreams right😂
@mitaanshshah41336 ай бұрын
@@Kam0717No, in reality
@percentbigfoot2 ай бұрын
@@Kam0717you can't be serious if you think that this is what will happen in reality. 😅
@digitalbharat1702 ай бұрын
Pakistani and Brits have huge brain
@aznmarty2562 жыл бұрын
21:49 was hilariously tragic! Imagine going on a suicide mission, and the NUKE that you dropped didn't even so much as bend the S400's post!
@Hitperson2 жыл бұрын
Cap, i'd be curious to see you guys build your "ultimate" air defence setup using a glorious datalinked mix of all nations and see whether or not your finest flighters is able to defeat it.
@eduardokarlos14192 жыл бұрын
S-400 is a ultimate air defence system, ukr conflict proven it. There's no flying planes if s-400 active, and there's no system better, only s-500
@Hitperson2 жыл бұрын
@@eduardokarlos1419 GR's successfu; incursions would prove that it isn't ultimate though.
@ojaspatki7722 жыл бұрын
If S400 cant be beaten why do you think adding stupid Patriots will make any difference lol😂
@rayven17492 жыл бұрын
@@ojaspatki772 grow up u little commie twat
@polarbear41982 жыл бұрын
was told in the 90's by the Army, a 5'10" man, on flat, clear terrain, can see 22 miles before earths curvature takes effect
@GarthKlaus2 жыл бұрын
IIRC I was told 23 miles is the farthest you could see.
@polarbear41982 жыл бұрын
@@GarthKlaus must be 1 inch taller than me
@randmht9976Ай бұрын
Lmao @@polarbear4198. True, height is the factor
@Davros-vi4qg2 жыл бұрын
Stalinium, make S400 strong! I mean the EMP blast alone would probs fry a few circuit boards 😀
@lucky_luke47852 жыл бұрын
Compression lift is supersonic engineering and relies on the shock wave, ground effect also has to do with pressure differences but occurs at low subsonic speeds already for example in an airfoil boat
@anirudhatalukdar93582 жыл бұрын
yes pakistan has invincible planes brought from mars airforce
@huzaifaasif854Ай бұрын
cry more indian
@xerogueАй бұрын
indian
@philosopherfrombed24 күн бұрын
@@xerogue Are you cryin?
@RelaxingNature-bb1dd23 күн бұрын
no they have better pilots
@xerogue22 күн бұрын
@@philosopherfrombed indian
@nitinagrahari1806 Жыл бұрын
If S400 made by USA then you showed it more and more effective 🌚🌚
@James-9999 Жыл бұрын
Actually they use Russias released stats so it is literally better in this game then irl
@jiteshgiri2639Ай бұрын
It is way more better in real@@James-9999
@theeducator8574Ай бұрын
Murican@@James-9999
@keshavkumar-bl6im26 күн бұрын
@@James-9999 then you are biggest idiot if you believe Russians to overstate their assets. They are understating their assets. They want you to believe s400 are just junk. Wars are not only fought with weapons but also by deceptions.
@martinpalmer62032 жыл бұрын
1 radar wont kill s400, especially since its data linked with AWACS and has multiple redundant radars, including data linking with other s300 and s400's
@Sufferingzify2 жыл бұрын
Hey Cap the S-400 Sam could be improved with the simple addition of 2 Aerostat Radar Blimps, for Over the Horizon look down while being protected by ABM of the SAM site.
@jmur30402 жыл бұрын
I've been to the keys twice, and it's always surreal to see one of those floating off in the distance.(well was, they decommissioned it in 2013)
@amitbhatt60363 ай бұрын
They can survive s400 but they can't survive mig 21 😂
@AliYashkunАй бұрын
Have some shame!! MIG-21 was shot down and it's pilot Wing Commander Abhi Nandan ejected and was captured and was served FUNTASTIC tea at a Pakistan Army office and was medically treated for curing injuries and was subsequently released without uniform but in civilian clothes (made in (Pakistan). Now, you want the world to believe that MIG-21 shot down an F-16 instead. Are you bitten by a dog or what?
@badwifisimulator9318Ай бұрын
Godi 😂😂
@yasirurooj8749Ай бұрын
Sala abhi nondone came to know this first hand 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂
@ruffianrg31Ай бұрын
Haha yeahh, true that.
@vidhayak1947Ай бұрын
93000 patloone
@Rajveer_Singh688 ай бұрын
Radar range of S-400 is 600 km Strike range of s-400 is 400km
@sohrabroozbahani47002 жыл бұрын
Cap really does read his comments, I mean everytime I threw in some witty sentences he actually bothered himself to put few words of answer to that, ( I am extremely flattered) super cap really cares about his valued humanoids...
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
I do my best x
@ojaspatki7722 жыл бұрын
Cap after putting India vs Pakistan in the title "Business is booming🤘"
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
lol
@craftencraft1777Ай бұрын
You know how to do business 😂
@tropicalparsoon2 жыл бұрын
Judging by recent events you can beat an S400 with a Sopwith Camel and a couple of grenades........ Overhyped rubbish?
@tropicalparsoon2 жыл бұрын
Or a slow quadcopter and a couple of mortar rounds, whatever tickles your pickle Cap. 😂
@8000jk2 жыл бұрын
How about a flamingo dropping a Molotov?
@andrewgagner29272 жыл бұрын
The dev responsible for modeling Russian equipment on DCS must have a part time gig as a congressional lobbyist for a US defense contractor overhyped is too kind.
@TheWeatherbuff2 жыл бұрын
@CAP, just letting you know how much I've enjoyed all these sequences. I'm brand new to DCS and just watching you guys has been great fun, and helpful! Soon, I'll "do a thing". :)
@saqibsultantemuri24372 жыл бұрын
Love how the PAF has developed Super Conductive mount for Nukes on their F-86's.
@chrisparnham2 жыл бұрын
Really? You actually love that wow what a funny thing to love.
@jewell12762 жыл бұрын
@@chrisparnham dude that fool is illiterate on the use of nukes & the consequences to iy
@letmethinkv Жыл бұрын
😂
@Anarchy_4202 жыл бұрын
I'd Love to see You fly The F-86 Sabre first against The A-10 Thunderbolt II and also against The SU-25!😁✌
@off_grid_javelin2 жыл бұрын
The thing is... even a weakling of a nation like Ukraine has layered air defenses like S75 and S125s distributed widely with manpads at their perimeters to kill low flying objects and S300 is placed after these defenses for S300 to be protected. Coming to India, it has "PAD and AADs" paired with s400s for long range interception, for mid range it has SPYDER, S125 pechora, Akash missile defense, 9k33 osa, 2k33 Kub, Barak 8, QRSAM, 9K35 strela sam, 2K22 tunguska, AA guns like Zsu 23 4 shilka, Zu 23 2, KPV machine gun, Bofors 40 mm, MANPADS like 9k38 igla s, Fim stinger, So overall, low flying isn't a piece of cake for PAF. But on the contrary Pakistan doesn't has that much layered heavy Air defense, so the situation will be pretty different if a rafale or tejas aircraft penetrated pakistani air defense.
@Blackbirdz20002 жыл бұрын
well the biggest advantage for PAF is, that IAF and Indian armed forces in general r shit. They would most likely endup shooting their own with these systems then they ever would to the intruding jets. That very Israeli SPYDER ended up blowing up its own helicopter in op. swift retort. The biggest disadvantage for IAF and Indian military is that Pakistan's Military is extremely competent and highly successful in battle experience. That op. swift retort was just one example of that competency of Pakistan Military and for Indian Military, its incompetency. I mean, this is the same military/intel. that has defeated 2 superpowers by simply outsmarting and outmaneuvering them. And the later, by using their own money against them........ So in Pakistan, we don't really give too much value to Indian Military capabilities, knowing very well that they will like always end up hurting themselves with them rather then us.
@off_grid_javelin2 жыл бұрын
@@Blackbirdz2000 Lolz you're the one to talk ? your Airforce took out it's own fricking destroyer ship of Pakistani navy 😂 google what happened to pns zulfiqar. Your Airforce couldn't even differentiate between your own or enemy's ship and you think they're competent ? Half your army comprises internationally wanted terrorists like lashkar and jaish. Internationally wanted terrorist hafiz saeed is a respected politician and Bin laden is a martyr on your country and you talk about competency ? half your generals dream of leaving army for politics and you're the one to talk about competency ? You know what you should call your nation Terroristan instead, can't even handle balochi terrorism and Afghani cease fire let alone thinking of another war against India, your country was begging vaccines from us during covid spread and now begging to start trade because flood screwed you guys 😂 AND YOU'RE THE ONE TO TALK ABOUT COMPETENCY ?
@darkmemes9532 жыл бұрын
@@Blackbirdz2000 Why not invade India then?
@Blackbirdz20002 жыл бұрын
@@darkmemes953 soon! whenever it suits our interests.
@krishi2348 ай бұрын
@@Blackbirdz2000 Indians are safe as long as your military thinks just like you. The whole of Pak can believe this, but don't expect the rest of us to leave our brains and follow you guys. 🤣
@zerogravity474921 күн бұрын
Irony is not indian godi media made propaganda about f16 shootdown by mig irony is mostly indians believed on them blindly 😂😂lolz
@jkull1732 жыл бұрын
Irony. You say “A bit of a relaxing one today” as you post India vs Pakistan content their KZbin warriors are gearing up for a wild day or arguing in your comments.
@yumyunrangLOAL2 жыл бұрын
That's literally 90% of why I clicked on this video
@28boudreaux2 жыл бұрын
I understand that it can't be simulated in DCS, but how much difference would having Prowlers/Growlers with you change the simulation? Maybe some folks that watch have some experience with that....
@dalel36082 жыл бұрын
"How would Pakistan take out a S-400 site?" Cap asks.. car bombs probably, and some of the leftover US weapons they buy from Afghanistan.
@syedahmed93232 жыл бұрын
They can grab some Indian weapons from balochistan for free too
@Blackbirdz20002 жыл бұрын
#Dale yup same way Pakistan humiliated NATO in Afghanistan against a bunch of Cavemen🤣🤣🤣 My God! what a humiliation that was that u suffered by the hands of Pakistan there!
@mrprodigy7143 Жыл бұрын
@@Blackbirdz2000 I want you to name a single country that could’ve done better than America and I’m gonna tell you why they wouldn’t. Please respond soon.
@Blackbirdz2000 Жыл бұрын
@@mrprodigy7143 we told u back in 2001, don't come here. U still did. We r the lords of these lands, those who challenge that status quo suffer the same fate! U need to ask this to those who were pushing u to do this since 60s/70s. After yr Pres. Kennedy died. They r responsible for the suffering yr received and receiving still as its aftermath. Where yr own enemies/competitors have been encouraged against u in the larger Global chess game. These ''great games'' aren't for everybody to play and succeed. U and yr civilization wasn't good enough or competent enough for that. Afterall WE R THE ONES WHO MADE U THE UNIPOLAR SUPERPOWER, even though we all know what yr position was at the global stage post Vietnam. And now a lot of people will say its also due to us that yr no longer a unipolar superpower, given what happened in Afghanistan, yr influence in Asia has been severely limited. so much so that KSA, by far yr biggest minion in Asia, is also no longer under yr control. And yr forced to put all yr eggs in one basket(India), who BTW just has agreed to buy cheap Russian oil in Chinese Yuan. Replacing yr dollar. KSA is about to do the same by allowing the sale of their oil in Yuan too. One of the biggest weaknesses of yr Empire was that it wasn't part of the Mainland World i.e. Asia-Europe land mass(so called Eurasia plate), where by far the largest concentration of population lives as well as the largest number of resources(rare earth) lie. That's why China AGAIN sanctioned u guys in buying rare earth materials and now yr forced to appease them again, just as u were when u send Blinken to them. Being not part of this land mass, yr at a severe disadvantage, u simply live in the part of the world where sun sets not rises. and the fact that u have 2 of the world's largest oceans in b/w. Americas being isolated by Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. U would have heard Americans being called ignorant/dumb by the other non American continental nationalities...its actually due to that fact that yr naturally isolated from mainstream world. Which is Asia and Africa, and by extension of Asia u can add Europe as in Asia Euro land mass. This geographical weakness of yrs was something that every opponent knew, that's also essentially what happened with u in Afghanistan too. Global politics/real politik is also like air warfare...u fight only according to yr strengths and by hiding yr weaknesses. Its not abt naming a single country doing better in Afghanistan, its a well known graveyard of Empires, from Alexander to NATO/ISAF all got defeated there eventually. Its was abt learning the right historical lessons and respecting them, instead of being what u guys were, cocky. That's why Lt. Gen. Babar the DG ISI back in 2001 told yr guy Ramsey to not come here. Yes the same Ramsey who threatened to bomb us back to the stone age if we don't cooperate with US. And u ended up getting exactly what u craved for. That's just how world works, every action has equal and opposite reaction(newton's law), so these r the consequences of yr decisions of 2001.
@PyroJovanny912 Жыл бұрын
@@mrprodigy7143he’s not lol
@21Walls Жыл бұрын
"We're bouncing around because of the ground effect" -Some pilot, flying with his wing 10 feet behind the jet exhaust of his wingman.
@mvfc76372 жыл бұрын
Well, that’s how they planned to do it during the Cold War and there’s an excellent channel on KZbin run by a British guy which interviews fighter pilots where an F-111 pilot stated their mission was to fly at very low level and deliver a nuke via the toss bombing technique, the mid-altitude stuff was implemented by the American’s because they knew they could get away with it due to the outdated SAMs used by Iraq and Serbia.
@Eo_Tunun2 жыл бұрын
Ground effect really kicks in when the altitude of the wing is about equal to its chord. You did not feel any real ground effect there. You must have been in simulated ground turbulence.
@RoyallVisuals2 жыл бұрын
I heard you mention the Tornado's in Iraq doing something similar. I'm currently reading the book Tornado that tells the story of the Tornado pilots in Iraq. It would be amazing to see you guys trying to do a similar style mission. The pilots had to A2A refuel in darkness and then fly on the deck in darkness over the Iraq desert whilst dodging AAA fire and other AA systems to bomb the runways.
@guyb79952 жыл бұрын
S300/400 seemed way overly capable in DCS, ED need to dumb it down to what the real world capabilities are being proven in actual theatres of war. Is there a 'drunk operator' skill setting in DCS?
@skatman32782 жыл бұрын
They've done absolutely nothing of note in Ukraine. They did nothing of note in Syria. They're the most overrated weapons system around at the moment.
@jtho89372 жыл бұрын
What air defence doing
@Rover200Power2 жыл бұрын
The S-400 must have done something, killed some innocent children perhaps? Most Russian weapons seem good at that.
@letmethinkv Жыл бұрын
@@skatman3278 😂 its an air defense system lols
@skatman3278 Жыл бұрын
@@letmethinkv no shit. Lols
@keysersoze34272 жыл бұрын
In answer to your question stand-off munitions and HARMS (Specifically the MAR 1 from Brazil and LD10 from China) the stand off munitions include RAAD missile (On Mirages) with a 350 km range. Few others but will take too long to type lol
@bradmaas68752 жыл бұрын
The A4 was designed for use with nukes. You might try it with that
@kiwibob2232 жыл бұрын
One of these two countries will DEFINITELY use an air burst nuke in real life !
@oladiedoo502 жыл бұрын
realistically i'd argue otherwise. despite having lots of non-conventional warhead capable missiles, none of the sides will actually use nukes, its just straight up mutual destruction and that'd be very unfavourable.
@ujjalshill64422 жыл бұрын
No they won't it won't come to that Pakistan has already given up
@kiwibob2232 жыл бұрын
@@oladiedoo50 I guess you are as likely to be right as I am. I've got close friends from both countries that I would describe as intensely rational adults (both scientific research personal) Rational that is until the other country is mentioned, then a switch is thrown. They remind me very much of my republican Irish and English friends.
@ujjawalbhardwaj80272 жыл бұрын
Naah mate, Can’t remember what time in history an Asian nation dropped nukes on other people. That’s the work of the west !
@Anarchy_4202 жыл бұрын
Lol wtf in REAL Life let's freakin hope not!
@TheWarjunkie6662 жыл бұрын
The dam/bridge in Nova Khakovka s400 sites just stood no chance against himars as of 1 hour ago 2:30 pm EST August 24 2022. 14 rockets just hit
@lowtdave2 жыл бұрын
Best video you've made. I learned a lot about the aerodynamics and blast radius of nuclear weapons.
@AbleLawrence Жыл бұрын
Try modelling a joint Indo-Israeli strike on Kahuta nuclear facility which was once under active consideration
@yasirurooj8749Ай бұрын
Oho ho ho becharay salay randian tried to do this but the madrchds failed😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
@johnarizvi2462 жыл бұрын
@CAP so they have Long rang ALCMs, land-launched Cruise missiles, the Mirage 3 and 5 ROSE r their deep strike elements with Standoff weapons and ACLMs, these r old but their speed and low-level flight is very effective. i think if a strike package of mirages is sent to do a deep strike the jeff and F16 can act as wild weasels to Lobb HARMS ( f 16 has HARMS too) J 10 r in too low a number to matter. They also have J7s (Chinese MIG) fast interceptors, OLD but good for distraction and cannon fodder.
@92HazelMocha2 жыл бұрын
Irl JF17 carries Ra'ad 2's; terrain hugging nuclear capable* ALCM's so a SEAD strike would largely be a waste.
@Samsungnote-ip6gu2 жыл бұрын
@@92HazelMocha please remember ALCM can be conventional bombs as well as Nuclear Tipped. PAKISTAN would only use Nuclear Weapons if it is in reply to an Indian Nuclear Strike.
@92HazelMocha2 жыл бұрын
@@Samsungnote-ip6gu That's my mistake, I should have specified that it can carry either.
@keysersoze34272 жыл бұрын
IIRC they have a HARM the MAR-1 which would be on the Mirages 3/5s and the LD10 on the JF17. The fact that the Ukrainians are still able to operate under s400 coverage shows the limitations of the system. They just need someone to light up their radars and then ripple a few HARMs at them.
@92HazelMocha2 жыл бұрын
@@keysersoze3427 JF17 can also carry MAR-1's, but only on the two inner pylons, it was built to be compatible with pretty much all the munitions Pakistan already had.
@Stinger5222 жыл бұрын
Airburst usually has more range than ground burst. And I wouldn't be in such a hurry to laugh off the S-400. Granted it's not shooting down Ukrainian fighters left right and center, but as an area denial weapon, it really doesn't have to. The few times we've seen the UAF flying, they usually fly low. The S-400 might be dictating where and how they fly just by being present. Think about the battleships in World War Two. Granted they didn't fight each other very often but their presence or lack thereof in any given area would dictate how the other guy operated.
@cacogenicist2 жыл бұрын
They sure don't seem to be able to hit whatever GMLRS the Ukrainians are firing with HiMARS.
@Stinger5222 жыл бұрын
@@cacogenicist S-400 wasn't designed to intercept rocket artillery.
@VaibhavShete19812 жыл бұрын
Do a reverse for INDian su30mki vs hq9
@Archer892012 жыл бұрын
I think Rafales would be the strikers due to better ECM and Avionics while Su-30s fly fighter CAP
@92HazelMocha2 жыл бұрын
@@Archer89201 Yeah, Su30mki's would not even get close to HQ9's, even the older ones. Rafales on the other hand probably could.
@Archer892012 жыл бұрын
@@92HazelMocha those big SAMs are not very mobile when set up, Su-30s could lob air launched brahmos at them from 300Kms away though
@92HazelMocha2 жыл бұрын
@@Archer89201 True. I wonder if they could shoot down brahmos's. Very little has actually been written about HQ9 since like 2003.
@VaibhavShete19812 жыл бұрын
@@Archer89201 I don't think rafales will be used against pakistan unless in a very contested airspace. They will be kept to keep in check any Chinese activities
@priyanshuchourey86082 жыл бұрын
Nuke proof walls😂😂
@fleablock2682 жыл бұрын
Maybe the engine only simulates the kinetic blast wave? If a 14 kit nuke went off there would be some fireball, even on the surface right?
@Lxcx3112 жыл бұрын
Yes there is no fireball in DCS sadly
@SpaceDustStuff2 жыл бұрын
The S400 are clearly way over tuned in DCS.
@billdevitt43242 жыл бұрын
@Space Dust absolutely concur ☺
@IrvingNestorRandom2 жыл бұрын
How would you know?
@stewartmurray58302 жыл бұрын
A 1400kt nuke from 5 miles would flatten that whole airbase
@justicethedoggo36482 жыл бұрын
1400kt nuke just for killing s400 is a big risk coz they might endanger their whole country with nuclear Retaliation
@ketsan2 жыл бұрын
You need a stopwatch for navigation. Such and such at time at such and such a speed so that you know at what time you need to execute the pop up.
@mortoopz2 жыл бұрын
It shouldn't have reminded you much of the Gulf war Tornadoes, those beasts have ground tracking radar, SUPER easy to fly
@scientificpeople022 жыл бұрын
Cap, does the S400 prioritise the type or threat for which one to engage first? Wouldn’t a volley of HARMs confuse the system to allow a volley bomb attack to pass through?
@ronaldmcboggled9855 Жыл бұрын
Are Indians and Pakistanis arguing who is less hygienic, super creepy or just rude? I dot get the rivalry?
@MeragRealmАй бұрын
Who gets to break in your daughter.
@ronaldmcboggled9855Ай бұрын
@@MeragRealm poo stink man detected lol
@sarathmanoj04mytubeАй бұрын
And with the mandatory racist blockhead, the comment section is complete.
@RandomBeluga187818 күн бұрын
@@MeragRealmlmfaooo
@homermorisson91352 жыл бұрын
"Nuclear blasts went miles and miles" - well, that all depends on the payload... a small (relative) nuke will do only (relatively) small localized blast damage and much more severe radiation damage. Then there's the question of what the specific bomb's designed for: massive area damage, or targeted damage with lots of irradiation in the surrounding areas... and last but not least: Aren't most nuke designs still top secret, so how realistic can any such bomb even get? It's not like there's that much ppl who really know how it behaves to begin with, right?
@TheCaptainbeefylog2 жыл бұрын
While many bomb designs are often Top Secret, the mathematics behind them aren't. Anyone with the ability to manufature high-quality optical lenses can make a working nuke.
@homermorisson91352 жыл бұрын
@@TheCaptainbeefylog Can design*, not make... I don't think "anyone" would be able to get their hands on enough fissionable weapons-grade material, and good thing too, heh.
@mcdjay2 жыл бұрын
12:42 Is anyone going to talk about how low that actually was? Damn i swear he may have even hit. I have never seen dust kicked up from the blast
@Maeyanie2 жыл бұрын
I guess there's a reason the Russians tossed those things almost straight up... much easier to aim that way.
@colinboneham7387 Жыл бұрын
I’d say the distance probs were the smoke waypoints, due to the fact as you passed them the range altered to the next one.
@tbe01162 жыл бұрын
How many TLAMs would it take to overwhelm a S400 network?
@alizeh__Shah1Ай бұрын
Today Pakistan have fatah 2 we can easily counter S400 and in 2 years Pakistan will get their 5 generation jet so no worry❤
@syedsheharyaarhaidersheraz2811Ай бұрын
Also pakistan is soon going to develop fatah 3 and fatah 4 with range upto 1000kms
@PoliticalSeer-ii3wh24 күн бұрын
Yes Pakistan has a Missile that Can Reach the Moon in 2 Seconds It is Called '''Virgin 72 Mo''' Missile
@a7i_.23 күн бұрын
@@PoliticalSeer-ii3wh ur aggrogance shows, immature dog
@pranav577715 күн бұрын
with what money?@@syedsheharyaarhaidersheraz2811
@anthonykearney6082 жыл бұрын
Glad to see the sabre getting some love. Such a sexy aircraft
@gonzalobrig2 ай бұрын
I did the same but with rockets. It is almost infallible. You must fly always low, 50 ft max and launch rockets at the mast. Countermeasure as much as you can while flying away low.
@victoriaskuse1182 жыл бұрын
That was entertaining…. Thank you very much 😊
@jonathantoymaker2 жыл бұрын
Always entertaining
@ryanpayne77072 жыл бұрын
There was a nuclear test where there were soilders in trenches inside the blast radius of the bomb. The shockwave passed right over them without harm.
@jonathantoymaker2 жыл бұрын
Not exactly
@petergriffin89692 жыл бұрын
other than the brain damage they were good
@johnwinter22522 жыл бұрын
Yeah, learning history off KZbin isn't the best thing to do.
@8wayspeed5052 жыл бұрын
Sounds like what the did to the Australian Black Fellas at Mararlnga
@ryanpayne77072 жыл бұрын
@@johnwinter2252 This came from my 10th grade AP world history class.
@therealdebater2 жыл бұрын
Can you get the nuke to air burst? I think that would help make it do more damage (if it is well modelled in DCS). Can DCS do the kind of high-power EW that, for example, the Raven EF-111 can? That might be a way to attack a tricky IADS.
@rubiconnn2 жыл бұрын
I don't think the air burst will help in the way that it does in real life but it will help in DCS. In real life nukes are airburst so that the shockwave reflects off the ground and you get a kind of double shock wave. In DCS though the airburst will help by making all of the targets be in direct line of sight and not blocked by terrain. I'm pretty sure DCS uses a basic ray trace to determine if objects or the terrain is between the explosion and any units in it's blast radius.
@freemandiy2 жыл бұрын
Not modeled in DCS
@Call_Me_Ainz2 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure its not modeled, they have dropped nukes before and it just flattens landscape, no boom boom
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
Neg, ground fuse only in game.
@dreamhunter29732 жыл бұрын
If they do airburst, in real life, Most of the Nuclear dust will be ending in Pakistan itself..... So I don't think it's a good idea...
@xxxm9812 жыл бұрын
Well, we know whos fault it is if tommorrow there is a strange glow sighted in Kashmir XD
@steves84822 жыл бұрын
If you fire a pizza at an S400 net, first one radar blows up, then another, then another. It's the Domino effect... Oh and BTW Cap - a two pronged sword is a fork...
@sleat2 жыл бұрын
Well, since you're delivering nukes, I'm wondering if there is a Pakistani version of "When Johnny Comes Marching Home Again" as featured in "Dr. Strangelove"? Also, I'm wondering if you brought your eye-patch? USAFE German-based F-100s delivering "specials" had an eye-patch. They'd wear the eye patch on one eye during ingress, and then after delivery, switch the patch to the other eye for egress, if they survived that is.
@TheVaibhav26Ай бұрын
In a real-life scenario, most of these guys wouldn't even actually reach anywhere close enough to drop the nukes.....
@hasanferoz2364Ай бұрын
That's not Abhinandan they are talking about lol
@speedyham5456 ай бұрын
I know the comment is very late- but real nuclear bombs air-burst at a set altitude above the target (depending on bomb yield) to get the large area of destruction and avoid the protection that would be provided by low hills and earthworks (as seen in your game).
@oladiedoo502 жыл бұрын
cap how would a bunch of LD10s on jeffs fare against the SAM network? Now what we have found out the closest we can go into s400 without getting blown up we can further improve this mission* by introducing HARMs at ig essentially point blank range? - considering LD10s will be travelling very fast in a short distance. using 2 or 4 in each jeff and sending even 3-5 jeffs at once could a. give much higher chances of a more valuable hit. b. at least remove the issue of having to pop up and essentially confirm your death - plus dumb bombs being inaccurate in nature ur just risking both the airframe and the efficacy of the shot.
@jameshewitt88282 жыл бұрын
Cap, hope your well, been busy recently so catching up. Me and my son went to the British motor show at Farnborough last Saturday, you'd have loved it. We're booking Goodwood festival of speed next year too
@aldeanorobinson25132 жыл бұрын
Love your videos I learn a lot more than what I already know about fighter jets
@rashidkhatri423022 күн бұрын
The was Fantastic 😊
@pritamdutta48362 жыл бұрын
Everything is fine until the assumption that India do not have any fighter jet to protect its assets inside its own boarder.. :)
@justicethedoggo36482 жыл бұрын
And other missiles lol
@mrjava662 жыл бұрын
U.s. & u.k. + some nato intel and general craftiness is what is neutralizing the Russian s-400 in Ukraine. Logistics and intel for the win , again. Either your supply chain and Intel chain is robust, or you lose in a real war. Ww2, Korea, Vietnam, falkins, all turned on these.
@letmethinkv Жыл бұрын
There is no s400 in Ukraine
@ikabody2 жыл бұрын
Ground effect creates a higher pressure below the wing, drag is also reduced.
@Token_Civilian2 жыл бұрын
I wish I was cool enough to be like Cap and fly without a canopy and toss nukes. 🙂
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
lol
@curious_one115620 күн бұрын
What milsim software are you using !? Also, does US Command also use milsim ? What software do they use ?
@williamthomson74552 жыл бұрын
The best aircraft for Ground Effect was the Buccaner
@brianpullin6832 жыл бұрын
Hi cap, i an idea for a mission. Not sure if you have done this in the past. Based on real events. Cuban missile crisis. Part one of mission recon to locate primary targets ( launchers, radars ). Part two of mission strike based on recon findings, plus combat air patrol. Part three support of an invasion and part four targets of oppertunity cargo ships etc. Bonus part the assasination of enemy leader ( freddy cousin, former used car salesman turn rebel leader) hiding in a bunker Keep up the great work 👍
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Brian
@tovarish_kommandir18 күн бұрын
In real life f-16 can get close unless Russia has the airspace covered.. Like there should be air patrol near the s-400 sites soo idk how effective trying to sneak in would work
@sonar3578 ай бұрын
"That hit close" 'Close' only counts with horseshoes and nuclear weapons...
@bilalafzal61552 жыл бұрын
PAF will try such a mission with its Mirage III and IV and its cruise missile, Hatf and Babur cruise missiles, which its Mirages can drop
@McAllisterCo2 жыл бұрын
So this is what they meant when they said “Cap is a bit of a tosser!”
@27siddarthАй бұрын
At this point they xan just send trucks with nukes accross the border 😂
@gregorymceaddy888413 сағат бұрын
it would require extensive IFR because the falcons would have to go full military power.. you realize 1.5 hours at cruise before bingo..?..
@jasper_colorado2 жыл бұрын
H3 airfield I was part of the unit that secured it from Iraqi troops in the Iraq war in 2003
@bhuvaneshchaudhariАй бұрын
Not only there is s400, there is a 2 level ballistic missile shield which comes before the S400,
@charlietheunicorn53832 жыл бұрын
Logically, time to toss the horseshoes, hand grenades and nuclear weapons at a naval target?!?!
@Frank-yt3ei2 жыл бұрын
Cap, why don't you send 2 planes to each s400 and see what the result is with nukes you may get a better result. Or what about an emp? that would be fun
@morrisdyer95602 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@askarabbas3751Ай бұрын
Pakistan has developed guided mlrs namely fatah 1/2 that has a max range of 400km
@187A123 күн бұрын
It was meant to be a simulation video and indians in the comment section launching bollywood attacks 😂
@emergcon2 жыл бұрын
This gonna be such a mess when r/indiaspeaks sees this.
@milc44442 жыл бұрын
Why not try using Buccaneers which were specifically designed to toss UK nuclear bombs and were brilliantly accurate because the crews were in a different class to anything else.
@gregorymceaddy88842 жыл бұрын
You have a better chance of survival using low drag on bomb acquisition of target ...don't pop up..keep flying low and level out of target area...amateurs...this is the first training butterbars receive during air to ground missions...
@scottkendrick45442 жыл бұрын
400km is a pipe dream. Tracking with low frequency radar is quite different than a target grade lock with x band. When is the shine going to be knocked of the s400?🤣😂🤣
@JustalDragoone2 жыл бұрын
To be quite honest I don't think nukes are written nor scripted correctly in DCS as of yet, so they don't act accordingly as a nukes would normally or as players expect them to in DCS. Even with smaller nukes, you would think that the damage radius could be quite large enough to take out a small SAM sight even if the nuke impacted 5 to 10nm away. I'm no expert on nukes, what they can and can't do. I'm just saying that DCS might have to in the near future work on their "Nuke" to see if it can be rewritten and/or re-scripted, to make it more efficient, accurate and realistic.
@LyricSpotlights Жыл бұрын
Drones and Cruise Missiles are probably the best options
@stevenhelgren23052 жыл бұрын
would an EMP bomb attack help subdue the S400 for a short bit long enough to allow other ordenance to do their job?
@Blackbirdz20002 жыл бұрын
not a bad idea!
@wayneaustin55332 жыл бұрын
what about...,Insert silly question.
@WilfChadwick2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic! Especially when... Well, you know when 🤣
@asimjabbar84452 жыл бұрын
PAF doesn't have vintage F-86 anymore. But they have got J-10C, JF-17 and Mirage fighters all capable of Nuclear strike missions. For S-400 Pakistan could use stand off weapons like cruise missiles or radar homing missiles etc. Long range guided MLRS (150+ KM). Maybe even by swarms of drone strike in combination with missile and airstrikes simultaneously. Just by the presence of the threat from long range artillery/rockets India won't be able to deploy it's S400 systems within 200 KM of the battlefield/contested areas without risking it's destruction.
@dreamhunter29732 жыл бұрын
Hello, the S 400 isn't a stand alone system, so they will be operating in tandem with Indian AWACS,jets, other aircrafts and Independent installed radars..... So yo can't just sneek up on it..... In short: No Air defence system is invisible or impenetrable. But something as advanced as the S 400 is gonna be a really difficult system to take out, and also think that it's made to counter the Raptors.... That speaks for itself... So trying to take out S 400s using F 16s and J 10s will be really difficult and Costly....
@haseebwaqar89802 жыл бұрын
@@dreamhunter2973 You're talking about cost when it comes to war crazy; These thing's are bought & maintained for this day.
@asimjabbar84452 жыл бұрын
@@dreamhunter2973 lol raptors! S400 can't even defend Russia from Ukrainian mig 29s. Indian SAMs failed to intercept a single PAF in Feb 2019 during operation swift retort. But instead Indian SAM shotdown its own military helicopter. These ranges, detection and tracking capabilities are highly degraded under heavy EW jamming. And Russia and India till now failed to demonstrate S400's claimed capabilities in real world.
@dreamhunter29732 жыл бұрын
@@asimjabbar8445 There was no S 400s in IAF inventory at 2019, our first system came online in 2021....🙄. Ask the Turks how good the S 400s is..... They know... That is why they even sacrificed the F 35s for it....
@dreamhunter29732 жыл бұрын
@@haseebwaqar8980 Yep, cost in a real war ...... Well what else did you expect....?
@emmata982 жыл бұрын
Thank you! :)
@RisingDad2 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised you don't have a tournament or ranking of all planes in DCS top to bottom.
@Smokeyr672 жыл бұрын
The Pakistanis bought the Sabres from the RAAF, they had different engines and armament (20mm cannon instead of .50 cal).