Cracking Up a Customer

[@cassieball3338]

This is like the 3rd time I've witnessed the judge not understand that a television can be cracked and not be able to see it when the TV is off and when u turn it on it is cracked internally.

[@justzee1574]

Yes, it's happened to me. I moved. I never had no problem with my TV. It was mounted. It worked then it went put. It was cracked. These Tvs are sensitive

[@NubianP6]

I was going to say the same thing. How many times does she have to try cases like this before she finally gets it? 😂

[@TommieGun71]

@@NubianP6 .... It makes her look completely ignorant.

[@Bnizzofashizzo]

She’s super smart but the tv thing… she struggles with. I saw at least 1 other case where she took a recess and consulted a tech that works for the show

[@reggie_ulon]

it's my second time

[@JamieM470]

The man outside actually made a very logical statement at 8:35 that Harvey brushed aside because it wasn't a direct answer to his question. "Nobody hires somebody to install a broken tv." Installer broke that tv.

[@WWRNC]

Nobody sane. People do in fact scam service companies. It’s foreign to you, because you’re of average intelligence and wouldn’t embark on such a thing. People do this all the time.

[@endiarapier5663]

Great observation! I definitely agree, that’s a valid point!

[@bobberry1463]

People do it all the time. they hire the person and than blame them for the tv.

[@sharishamccoy9932]

The installer should have turned on the t.v before installing it, just to cover himself....

[@onasamaya1]

😂someone who wants to get money for damaged tv can get someone to hire, and hope he does not check it before installing

[@Mocharocks9966]

Judge Millian always does this with televisions lol she can never get the anatomy of flat screens

[@narrowgate4229]

That is so funny I was just thinking of the same thing the case with the other TV internal crack lol

[@Mocharocks9966]

@@narrowgate4229 yes lol you’re a fan too !

[@jeremySJThompson]

Facts. Maybe she gets in now lol

[@C3yl0]

Because that is not how legal reasoning works. You cannot assume or assert that A always results in B or that because C, then D will always occur. This is how logical arguments work.

[@narrowgate4229]

@@C3yl0 Fans understand. But thank you for explaining legal logic so insightful

[@stratfordbaby]

Defendant needed to make sure the TV was NOT damaged BEFORE he touched it. His mistake.

[@prettyblkgyrl74]

LMAO @ Kurt saying “ it looked like a humpty dumpty job you were doing there". I swear the shadiness that comes out during those after the verdict interviews is HILARIOUS

[@andrewmckenley5355]

I thought I was the only one that noticed

[@MrAlienmagnet]

It took me a few episodes to understand Kurt, now I look forward to his part of the show because I know he will get a good one in lol

[@andred7415]

Judge Milian really hasn't been out and about in the real world in some time. "How do you know its cracked internally" uhh because I can see a crack and you can't feel it. Duhhhhhh ffs lady

[@6PinkGlamour9]

She actually knows quite a bit... Just because she asked how the plaintiff knew it was internally cracked, doesn't mean that she is a shut-in.

[@andred7415]

@@6PinkGlamour9 she has a comment like this on every subject but basic home repairs 🤣

[@6PinkGlamour9]

@@andred7415 She has to ask questions to figure out if the plaintiff or defendant are telling the truth. if you don't like watching a Judge ask questions or give comments, why do you watch Court TV?

[@andred7415]

@@6PinkGlamour9 there is no reason for her to ask obvious questions

[@6PinkGlamour9]

@@andred7415 There is for the very reason I stated... so that she could tell if they were telling the truth or not. She already does the research on every case silly. She doesn't come into the case unprepared. She has decades of work under her belt. She knows what she's doing lol

[@kinpin3919]

She really pissed me off on this case. “How do you know it’s internally “. Because you see the crack and you can’t feel it when you run your finger across it.

[@MrsBryant1024]

So what! Then don't watch.

[@madnesss445]

​@MrsBryant1024, don't be so sensitive.

[@uMADden]

As an installer always check the tv by turning it on and making sure it works

[@LadyWhiggy]

Man, that TV could have very well been damaged before he got there. Gotta do more to cover your arse! I would need to see the television fully functional before beginning my work.

[@Childfree334]

This is very true. My repairman asked me to do that before he hung my 85" frame TV to ensure there were no pre-existing issues.

[@LadyWhiggy]

@@Childfree334 Smart man!

[@andrewmckenley5355]

@@Childfree334 lol

[@NubianP6]

The way the guy in the audience laughed at *”Look”* 8:17. 😂

[@NubianP6]

There is no way that using an extension cord on a “professional installation” is the standard. 😂

[@abundantlife24]

I was looking for this comment! I'm no expert but that extension cord can't be right.

[@santanachannel1861]

At least in Kansas, the code states, "permanent extension cord wiring is prohibited. Electrical wiring must be connected to circuits." Extension cords behind walls is extremely dangerous.

[@jasminebryant6575]

Gru that's where you've been! Your villainy knows no bounds! Lol

[@designerwench]

Judge Millian is absolutely correct, you cannot use an extension cord behind the wall.

[@JayseGreene]

I actually shuddered when I heard that. Doesn't matter if its super duper duper heavy duty, you cant. The only way I can think of that this can be done is via a licensed electrician and the wire is encased.

[@sharifsalem]

They sell in home depot a type of extension cord to bring power from a lower outlet to behind a TV with no high voltage electrical work done. I have two in my house.

[@aaronhollowell5788]

If the tv cord that it comes with doesn’t reach the outlet then you can use a surge protector/ extension cord!

[@justzee1574]

They started off so expensive. Now they are $999 now.

[@allie4965]

they are around $500 now

[@aaronhollowell5788]

I paid $500 for a 55 inch 4K ultra Hd smart tv back in 2020 I think.

[@robertlaschever3935]

Good call Judge, cord in the wall is totally not to code and a fire hazard.

[@blueicey4117]

Right!!! I’d be more concerned about that extension cord.

[@brandyhollingsworth6816]

The defendant botched the job because he’s actually an undercover international hit man waiting to persue his real target, the next door neighbor 🤣🤣🤣(I watch too much tv)

[@deeransom]

Favorite comment 😂😂😂

[@Bigmuffin8]

😵‍💫😵‍💫🥴😂😂

[@mrshappilymarried1]

I agree emphatically with this comment! Clearly he was busted by the plaintiff whilst doing surveillance on the intended target and he had to go along with it...

[@wouldntyouliketoknow1477]

Big time! That’s exactly what I thought. Dude was an absolute unit.

[@ladyprophetofcle]

😆 🤣 😂

[@VirgoCali89]

The judge always fucks up on these cases as if a flat screen can't be cracked internally

[@maicataylor2813]

The Judge literally said she probably is wrong and doesn't know so I don't see an issue. She admitted

[@zuritribe4844]

[@cookiechocolate2471]

My daughter and I have a flat screen TV. My daughter accidentally dropped hers. Looked like not a scratch. The second you turn it on such pretty lines of tv. So yes you can drop a flat tv that looks like no scratches

[@Channel-JJ]

Did she drop it because she had some chocolate on her fingers from cookies and it slipped? 😆

[@Channel-JJ]

@Marilyn Willett 👍

[@stephaniiiii7202]

The defense is foolish for not turning it on before he messed with anything. He knows he broke it if he installed these regularly then he will know you barely even have to put pressure for these TVs to crack. I have seen one crack by somebody handling it and pushing their thumb too hard into the screen. Maybe it was lucky that this happened so they don’t end up with a fire hazard and extension cord as their wiring lol

[@magicworld3242]

"(Cracking Up A Customer)". I seriously thought this was gonna be a case involving two crackheads 🤣

[@deeransom]

😂😂😂😭

[@varanidguy]

The person who hung the TV likely used screws for the mount that were too long. It's actually laid out in manuals for TV mounts that you need to get the length right to prevent cracking the panel from the INSIDE of the TV. That's also why they always provide spacers because often the screws with the proper thread pitch can be too long, so you add a spacer and it's all good.

[@mickm6309]

But also the plaintiff may have stuffed up when he set up the tv as the screws had to be drilled out and he obviously had the tv in storage for some reason if the box was there.

[@mickm6309]

@Christopher Moore Yes, but how would you get them in that tight that they need to be drilled out? I have put stands on tvs and monitors, I have never tightened them that much.

[@amandablake2899]

Oh ok I understand now that makes sense

[@Jahmai203]

Here we go again w/this judge not understanding how a flat screen TV can be damaged without being physically scratched on the outside. Smh

[@QueContinuum]

So she ruled in favor of the plaintiff. Seems like she understood very well.

[@Jahmai203]

@@QueContinuumIn her initial line of questioning, in the beginning, she did not. And she has had issues understanding cracked LED screens in other cases.

[@oodief88]

I don't know whether she acts oblivious and wants them to explain...or she really just doesn't know. It's frustrating because it's pretty simple.

[@QueContinuum]

@@Jahmai203 yes true. Then the plaintiff explained and she was shown by the actions of the defendant how that could happen. After that she got it. I think the judge wants people to explain the process sometimes. I don't think she's completely ignorant.

[@cheyennexo5714]

Lol there was similar case she’s done like this before where she didn’t understand and it’s so frustrating

[@adrianprince7266]

Thankfully the plantiff had all the evidence to prove his case. This is how you need to be when something goes wrong.

[@sharifsalem]

But no evidence of a working TV with all his security cameras?

[@blacknerdygirlsrock]

He didn’t pay $4000 for that TV…

[@Trich-nf2zf]

Facts! Especially round Christmas and Black Friday. Why he talking bout it was a gift for your family. How u gonna get them a gift and wait 6 months to get any benefits from the gift🤦🏽‍♀️

[@ladyprophetofcle]

@@Trich-nf2zf you'd think that. But my brother has a 50 inch still in the box. It's waiting for the space to be completed. So it does happen. It's been there for a few months

[@TheCurvyCanuck]

I think it was a older case and at those times flat screen tvs where very expensive

[@dianeeppley1322]

There’s no way he paid $4000. You can get that tv for $900 max

[@allexisgreen9491]

Do y’all know what kind of tv he had? 🤣

[@chuck9380]

Why would he pay to hang a broken TV lol plus it’s on camera by chance catching the guy right in the act

[@Trich-nf2zf]

But was it a setup tho

[@contessahinson]

Yeah let Me hang this broken tv.....yeah that will surprise your family alright 🤣

[@elaine462]

To get a new tv. And what a coincidence the security camera was installed in the living room a week earlier.

[@sharifsalem]

@@elaine462and no video of TV working the previous days. And using a TV on floor for 6 months? There may be something in the defendants theory.

[@joeysantos3978]

Exactly

[@nunya8010]

That's ALOT of depreshiated value judge for a 6 month old tv,if that was her tv she just bought she would take $100 off and make the guy pay the rest!

[@davidewersphotography1013]

as soon as you drive a new car off of the lot and have driven it for a thousand miles, you lose thousands. have it a year, even more

[@TommieGun71]

WTH is depreshiated?

[@ButtonsCasey]

Its 500 dollars which is in the range of what he could have sold it for. Its about 25% off the original price, which is fair.

[@crystalshaw8744]

@@TommieGun71 Lol thank you was wondering the same thing.

[@stephaniehowe0973]

People just dont understand how quickly things depreciate

[@onasamaya1]

Defendant-please check TV before you try to install! There are some scams going on.

[@markpolice3585]

The plaintiff should've been kicked for saying that he paid $4000 for that tv.

[@marleonetti7]

judge didnt explain how she was qualified to say what the installer did to damage the tv . judge didnt call any tv manufacturers or tv repair shops to quality her decision . the installer did get info from a tv dealer and they explained that the type of damage happens if it is dropped , but not placed on a couch with cushions on it .

[@deanwinchesterinthedarktower]

I mean, did he though? I could tell you right now that I'm a tv repair person and I disagree. But without proof of that, how do you know? Her job is to listen to the evidence presented (and she usually does research beforehand. She gets all the info well before) and then rule.

[@cindymann3673]

It’s not the Judge’s responsibility to bring evidence.

[@marleonetti7]

@@cindymann3673 exactly ! its the judges job to require the proper evidence and if theres no evidence that he caused the crack then the case should have been dismissed .

[@shaniabrown7567]

The defendant should have checked to make sure the tv wasn’t already damaged.

[@Stressless2023]

$4k for just a 65" TV? This must be a 10+ year old episode lol.

[@RiiFT]

Either that or the plaintiff is a liar. Even if this was in 2014, 4k is pushing it. lol

[@James-134]

@@RiiFT There were some really stupidly expensive TVs back then when they were trying to make "3D TVs" a mainstream thing so it really wouldn't surprise me if it was one of those

[@graeson8]

I think this episode is from like 2010

[@ct6410]

The fastest way to make a judge not like you is to open, “This is an open and shut case.” That’s not for YOU to decide. Come in with the attitude that you run the courtroom and make the judgements and you’re not going to make a new friend. Worst case scenario, you get a judge who can’t separate their personal feelings from the merits of a case-like Judge Judith Scheindlin-and lose BECAUSE you pissed off the judge.

[@rum1105]

That’s a lot of depreciation

[@kellyfazekas7831]

The judge is getting as bad as Judge Judy about asking questions then not allowing people to answer when she yells over them. Drives me nuts.

[@travis8665]

People lie. Why does the judge have to put up with crap from liars?

[@jordanabell9385]

"so you had to do it like humpty-dumpty" - the savagery EVERY DAMN TIME gets me 😩🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@BREEZYM6015]

It's the case of "Your TV cracks me up". The TV could have been damaged prior to him drilling the screws out. They didn't show pictures of what the TV looked like beforehand.

[@earthraindove2870]

Yes, and screws were over tightened!

[@tis1ify]

Who takes pictures of their tv? You're kidding

[@sharifsalem]

@@tis1ifyhe had a whole security system set up a week before why no images of a TV working to boost his case?

[@rayannesheahan7908]

The laughing in the video from the plaintiffs side has it feeling suspect... Seemed more like "got you dude" than concern for the TV. Defendant def should have checked TV before working on it.. Also, have customer sign liability weavers like so many others

[@deanwinchesterinthedarktower]

I disagree. In the moment someone can say anything. Defendant had already said that stuff, but the plaintiff wanted to have it recorded. Defendant thought that was silly because "just trust me" should have been enough. In order to keep it light and airy, and not cause an issue, you play it cool as if it doesn't bother you. I know this because I had movers destroy my brand new mattress and literally the second the guy saw that I noticed, he started screaming in my face, as if I did something wrong. In order to calm the situation I stepped away, and when his boss came in I had to play it cool like I wasn't upset their company just destroyed my bed. I had to play along to keep the guy from getting violent (and trust me, 4 big dudes in your house, mad because they think they're gonna get sued, you want to play cool.) It's part of fight, flight or fawn. They were fawning.

[@dachamp6909]

4:00 what is she laughing at 🤣🤣got me laughing and I don't even know what we laughing

[@Shesaiditanyway]

I was shocked at how much depreciation she took off of the total to replace the TV. I’m wondering if a television can depreciate that much in value in 6 months. I mean now - he can get a nice TV for 1700… but idk what year this was.

[@christopherbako]

Sometimes....She's Crazy

[@25649sanchez]

every electronic depreciates in value because tech is always being made better nd better

[@Shesaiditanyway]

@@25649sanchez Yes, I’m aware but I was more so commenting on the time frame and not the depreciation itself.

[@Shesaiditanyway]

@@christopherbako That’s for sure

[@travis8665]

I wouldn't pay anywhere near that much for a used tv. He said it was $2200 new so he didnt lose much on it. I would never buy used stuff anywhere.

[@arianefr78]

WHAT? A TV that is only 6 months old does not depreciate by $700, normally the calculation is based on 10% per year, so the judge should have awarded him $2160. If I hired a professional to install my TV on a wall, I wouldn't expect it to have an extension cord hanging from it, nor would I expect him to drill out a screw, nor would I let him do anything to my TV without me hovering over his shoulder. It was definitely a Humpty Dumpty job ha ha ha...

[@steakman]

you're what installers call..... a nightmare. just take pics first of it working and sign a contract. then let them work. hovering over workers is the most disrespectful thing you can do.

[@travis8665]

Of course it depreciates more than 10% a year. I would say 30% the first year and 20% after that.

[@shellcity698]

3 minutes into the video and I read the comments. Now I don't wanna watch the video cuz it'll stress me out 😁

[@Nevaeh1]

this is why I don't like having tv's mounted they're not worth the trouble if the wall gets damaged or the tv

[@kay22100]

I mean he said it was an open and shut case lol 🤷🏽‍♀️

[@lolamaude3449]

These kinds of things are a losing deal for a plaintiff, he had a good working tv, he paid $4500 and now he gets $1700 and has to purchase a new one which costs more.

[@SL-rh9og]

And better than the last one he had

[@chrisplante8977]

This is a win for the plaintiff. The damage on that TV could not have resulted from unscrewing those legs if you've dealt with flat screens. He scammed the defendant and got away with it. Defendant should have had him turn the TV on before beginning work. The plaintiff also testified he was asleep during the defendant doing this work, yet there he was in the security footage on the phone watching him do it, weird.

[@travis8665]

He said he paid $2200.

[@TIKOMIX]

I think the TV was already broken when he arrived. That's why it was unplugged sitting on the floor unable to be connected.

[@karrifohey7848]

The exit interview with the Humpty Dumpty is the funniest thing I have seen in a long time.

[@craZbeauTful]

I really don't believe they broke the tv but I bet they will make sure it's working before installation now.

[@azrielladecker1465]

Can we talk about how prepared this man was

[@66jlunsford]

ma’am you’ve seen cases like this before. And you talked to ppl on your own production team for them to verify this. You know the tv can break from the inside.

[@lawjd96]

i know, she drives me crazy with that

[@honestyisadyingvirtue]

Do you know the dates of the shows? Perhaps this was before those other ones.

[@lawjd96]

@@honestyisadyingvirtue either way it's happened at least twice so dates do not matter

[@leondra]

i think the defendant was set up cause that tv was on the floor for six months and all of a sudden they want it mounted quickly 🤔 AND the plaintiffs have cameras ready? nah, that karma gonna come back for them.

[@mashellj1203]

I said that too right that's fishy

[@backshotbarbie2035]

I agree with everything you said

[@alyssahamlett]

I don't really understand this verdict they already gave you the depreciated amount the 2400 was depreciated and now you're gonna depreciate it even more you think in 6 months A TV goes from $4000 to a 1000?!?! EITHER WAY.. This episode has to be super old because TV is pretty cheap now

[@travis8665]

The plaintiff said he paid $2200 for the TV. it should be much less than $1700 now.

[@SergioMedina593]

If I'm the installer, I have the customer turn the TV on first to make sure it's working before I start what I need to do. I doubt the tv wasn't working from the beginning. Installer definitely broke it.

[@barbaraness4507]

I also looked up the extension cord issue, and the information says it’s ok to use one if it’s the appropriate strength/amps/wattage draw for the tv/breaker.

[@latzmenon5770]

If anyone has to sue for a broken tv , please do not choose this judge . She’s got no idea that a tv can look perfect , until you switch it on . Plus , she doesn’t make an attempt to learn or understand that .

[@3l3llala13]

No judge knows everything. They learn through the cases that they preside over.

[@BakedwithBaddie]

These cases with these TVs and their construction be kicking Judge Milian's ass 🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭

[@michellenuzzello3015]

Have a great day everyone!

[@victoriaEish]

We can use an extension cord to connect a t.v. If the cord is reputable. Regular house extension cords are not recommended, but they can be used. Very low electricity used.

[@hadley407]

I know the TV was relatively new, but people do scam so it makes me wonder if the screws were stripped out before the defendant started working on it and it is possible that the plaintiff stripped them out and broke the TV himself and then decided to call in a professional and blame everything on him 🤔 But that’s the difference in criminal and civil. More likely than not vs. beyond to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt

[@Mark_Demaline]

Installing an extension cord behind the wall could end up with a jail sentence. Totally illegal.

[@barbaraness4507]

When I looked up this tv damage on the internet it said “ this only occurs when physical force, or something heavy pushing/leaning against the panel would cause it to internally crack”!😱😳😬

[@34stzoo]

12:15 Is she kidding me? 1,700 dollars for a six-month-old TV he paid 2,200 for! What world does she live in that makes any sense? At the very least you would find that tv used for 2,000. Outside of the 15mins of fame, I don't understand why people would participate on this show? Especially if you have a Pitbull you will never get a fair judgment from her.

[@Childfree334]

You are picking on people for coming to be on a show that YOU are watching. Oh the irony😂😂

[@maureensmith-pinkard460]

@@Childfree334 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@theresasmith7230]

It's true about the pit bulls, but l got to ask why are they the only ones out here that get away from their owners and viciously attack?

[@kathleenbrooks8258]

I was thinking the same thing!! She should have given him the whole 2,200!

[@ButtonsCasey]

Just because someone sells something for a certain price doesn't mean it's worth that price. A TV appreciates very fast and depending on the brand, it's even faster. Like Vizios are shit and within 6 months, you will be thinking about replacing it, especially if you game. Ugh. F Vizio. Lol

[@JahBold]

I’m the lady behind the plaintiff 😂😂😂

[@kelielli]

It is so frustrating that Judge Million does not understand electronics. I am her same age and I know that we grew up in a different time but she needs to get educated in modern technology in order to be fair as a judge in todays world

[@MrChrisBozwell]

I think their tv broke and the were looking for a sucker to buy em a new one.

[@CRAY0NEAT3R]

They sell in wall extention cord kits for exactly thus reason. It's to code if he used a properly shielded cable.

[@shellymilligan2953]

A TV is like a brand new car. Once you drive off the showroom floor it’s value goes WAY down!!

[@johnasbury3744]

Judge needs to get some street smarts my buddy bought a stereo system for his car he tried doing it himself and burnt up his amp he put everything back in box and took it to an installer and blamed him and got new amp and got it installed so yes the TV could have been broken

[@Dolphinmomcca]

Why would they want a broken tv installed?? They obviously didn’t break it before they paid to have someone install it lol

[@MrStudo67]

"There was no humpty dumpty at all"

[@noleeps]

Judge was completely clueless about this case. Getting the screw put wouldn't have damaged the tv.

[@lawjd96]

you're the one who is clueless, it was the way the tv was positioned

[@Vegasbaby115]

Happy day fam 🤙🏽🤙🏽

[@spacepanda9037]

The defendant lied about everything lmfao even about the extension cord

[@megansmith1382]

Bwahaha Plaintiff: Okay this is pretty much an open and closed case Judge: I'll be the judge of that. Bwahaha 🤣

[@goodwill374]

As soon as he said the tv was laying face down on the couch. I knew that tv was broken

[@irideaunicorn1620]

He broke it and he knows it

[@harmonynature1418]

Kurt: “You had to do it like Humpty Dumpty, you had to”😩😂😂😂😭 The Defendant knows he damaged that TV & running extension cords behind the wall is definitely not up to code & is a major🔥hazard❌🚫

[@ddinottia39]

You can't crack a TV internally! Look it up

[@rporter1640]

Nice to meet another Runako

[@markjones97]

The plantiff sounds like one of the Wayans brothers.

[@WWRNC]

I believe the defendant on this. That kind of damage requires a drop or a lot of physical pressure. He didn’t do that drilling on the back of it. He was scammed, but he didn’t do his part in having proper evidence or checking that it worked before he started. Also, it would be more of a fire hazard to run a drop cord behind drywall than it would be some faux rocks. I wouldn’t personally do it, but it’s not that big of a deal especially if it’s a surge protector cord anyways.

[@bobberry1463]

actually that damage can happen with screwing and not that much damage. if they use the wrong screw it would do that.

[@chrisplante8977]

@@bobberry1463 They were removing the manufacturer screw from the legs which were installed by the plaintiff so no, the defendant could not have caused this damage unscrewing those legs in this case.

[@Trich-nf2zf]

@@bobberry1463 if he was screwing on the front of the tv yea. But that damage don't come from screwing on the back

[@Itsonlylue]

RUNAKO IS HANDSOME

[@larrybrown3951]

If the plaintiff knew so much about what was wrong and how to fix it, why didn't he do it himself?

[@glenncurley680]

I had a service man break my oven door on my new gas stove and refused to order the parts unless I gave him $350. I asked to take a video of him admitting he did it. He said that's hostile behaviour, I'm leaving.

[@megansmith1382]

Haha 😂 I frickin love this show. How can you not? Haha PLEASE KEEP POSTING THEM. I will 100% continue watching 👀 hehe 😁

[@alexcaswell]

“There was no humpty dumpty”. Lol Listen to “Here Comes Bonnie Binoculars”, on the streaming service that you prefer, to have less Humpty Dumpty in your life!

[@alexcaswell]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y6HFZmttos5li6M

[@southernbelle850]

He's literally on camera saying they broke the tv?!

[@whocares_bear]

They couldn't ask to bring out a mattress or something to place the TV on to remove the stand? Or take off all the couch cushions and arrange them 50-ish inches wide?

[@Blue_Collar_Colonizer_1776]

The plaintiff looks like a KZbinr "the armed fisherman." Here in Florida we can open carry while fishing, camping and hiking. So he goes all around Florida fishing while armed to see if our civil rights are upheld. Which they, the police, often go to far. But this dude looks like a darker skinned version of him.

[@Blue_Collar_Colonizer_1776]

@Marilyn Willett depends on where I'm going and what I'm fishing out of. Usually something smaller like my 9mm hellcat. But if I'm on my center console I have a 300 blk out pistol I'll carry because there's no much risk of tipping like in my kayak. But what's that matter?

[@Blue_Collar_Colonizer_1776]

@Marilyn Willett also he goes fishing with his AR-15. Similar to my blk out.

[@JayseGreene]

So the defendant leaned on the TV and caused internal dmg but not external dmg? Right!!!!

[@sharifsalem]

So the TV was used on the floor for six months? Does plaintiff have video of it turned on working any days before the date the installers were there?

[@thechefmike]

How does she NOT understand how tvs work after 4 trials now

[@keondra9820]

Dimitri needs to let that ponytail go! 😩

[@sneakerfreak2002]

Total setup. SUDDENLY they want to hang a tv and they are more than ready with cameras to capture some oaf from Craigslist cobbling it up

[@innocent718bk]

I was thinking that too seems like he was setup

[@sancraft1]

You don't fish an extension cord behind the wall. That is a fire hazard.

[@crazylopez1980]

I would have said turn the damn TV on so I can see it work

[@stevebutler812]

I think what the $1,700 is for is if you bought a used tv it would depreciate significantly the minute you took it out of the box. So, if he sold it after six months he'd get $1,700

[@MaxDalessio]

This is what happens when you save money you get a company that is not very professional and inexperienced

[@stevebutler812]

Since the installer failed to verify the tv was fully functional, we can not know if it was broken beforehand. But, the weight of the evidence suggests the crack was initiated from a pressure point.

[@wouldntyouliketoknow1477]

The defendant could possibly punch through a wall stud, which I feel should have been considered in the judgment.

[@christopherbako]

Judge, get over the extension cord.