Creality Scan Raptor Vs Otter - High Detail Object

Рет қаралды 3,488

Ай бұрын

Scanning high detail object, metallic surface without spray.
Raptor gives 3 times more point cloud density than the Otter.
Here's the link for marker target. (Sketchfab)
skfb.ly/oUKzC
Marker 30 deg
skfb.ly/oUNEO
Marker 60 deg
skfb.ly/oUNFx
Maker long distance target
skfb.ly/oURvQ
#creality #3dscanning #blender #coludcompare
Music by www.bensound.com
License code: N95HZPXUFSFCL92M

Пікірлер: 25

@MA-qx6rn Ай бұрын

The laser scanning mode and tracking on the Raptor looks very easy to use, the results for something so shiny are great, even if it wasn't shiny, very good.

@android4cg Ай бұрын

Amazing good comparision video! Would like to see more such videos! :-)

@alexandershinkarenko3725 25 күн бұрын

Niiiiice. Thanks. Raptor is amazing :)

@stevesloan6775 Ай бұрын

When you look at the ring end of the spanner, the raptor looks incredibly good, compared to the Otter. I would like to scan the inlet/outlet ports on engine cylinder heads. I’d love to see you scan the internal space on something tubular, to see how deep down the tube the laser can scan. Food for thought 😑 🇦🇺🤜🏼🤛🏼😎🍀☮️ Thanks again

@Payo-TensileCreator Ай бұрын

It can scan the bottom and some siding of 6mm wide 10mm deep groove. The edge of the holes will block the light path.

@fredmols8428 Ай бұрын

Very good videos. Thank you for pc comparison also. For otter fps. It has given best possible overview of these two scanners. Could you scan something that has cavities. For example my einstar had problems with bolt holes under 5mm diameter. Also it did not have great depth. Meaning that when the object had lets say 50mm cavities inside or has like very landscaped shape then it had problems to see into lower parts. Giving me a model with lost data in cavities. That would be interesting video to see. Also you should compare otter with texture mode to raptor with marker mode. It seems to me that otter has little bit problems seeing markers.

@Payo-TensileCreator Ай бұрын

Otter in Small/Medium mode, you can't adjust marker brightness and object surface color will have effect on marker. But in Large mode, you can adjust brightness of marker and object separately. That's why Otter doesn't do well in small/medium - marker mode.

@AndreyBulgakov Ай бұрын

Thank you for your video. Don't you think that if the shiny wrench was coated with a matte spray, the Otter scan quality would be better?

@volcomx14 Ай бұрын

Probably but cost money 💰 think long term in this economy.

@Payo-TensileCreator Ай бұрын

Yes, you're right. When I scan white remote control. Otter gives more point cloud than Raptor in the same resolution setting (0.1mm). But spraying (I usually use Magnaflux SKD-S2) will thicken and cover the emboss text. I can try and put that in a video.

@Todestelzer 17 күн бұрын

I have the Raptor for a couple days now. It’s a nice scanner but I have issues with the fps scanning. I think it’s because of too many marker dots. AMD 5900x, Rtx 3080, 64GB But I’m unsure and still trying to figure out exactly why the fps are sometimes so slow. 5:11 here you have only 30fps too. But maybe it’s the software. I’m pretty sure it’s the amount of markers. Too much stuff to compute for the CPU. I used now minimal amount of markers and could get up to 60fps.

@Payo-TensileCreator 16 күн бұрын

FPS only drop when it loses the track. But that's for a split of second. I don't even notice it when scanning. If the scanner loses the track, the blue laser line will go off. I get 50 FPS with 0.15 mm res. in viewport. and 60 FPS with 0.4mm or above res. More markers don't affect scanning speed on my test. The more I put, the faster I can scan and move the scanner without losing the track.

@Todestelzer 16 күн бұрын

@@Payo-TensileCreator interesting. Then it must be something else. I will test more. I watched all yt vids available for the raptor and other people had fps drops as well to 20fps in laser mode. Oh and try and set it to 1mm res and don’t stop the scan when it’s green. You will get the same details when generating the point cloud as if you scanned with 0.1mm res but it will look low res until you generate the point cloud, It’s probably only an indicator thing and don’t do anything to how the scanner is scanning the part. Looking forward to your review. The hardware is really nice but the software… hmm 🤔

@user-he3ql2sz4m Ай бұрын

can you tell us about the processing step and specially about the markers, how you remove them there is any command for this or automatically removes them ?also with laser scan mode is necessary for the markers or without them there is no tracking point. thanks a lot

@Payo-TensileCreator Ай бұрын

Raptor in Blue laser will only work if it sees markers (> 4 points) but it this video, I didn't apply markers directly on the object. I put targets around the object instead. What I did is I manually select and delete the surrounded target.

@jorgem3625 Ай бұрын

why there are some markers floating on the air ??... the software create this error ?? and still working ok ?

@Payo-TensileCreator Ай бұрын

You mean in the view port while scanning? it's not floating, it's kind of see through.

@gregbarnhouse8923 Ай бұрын

Please scan something at 0.02 mm and show the scan quality at that level for the Raptor.

@Payo-TensileCreator Ай бұрын

0.02 mm is advertised accuracy for position of point cloud in space. 0.1mm resolution gives best detail this scanner can give as I have tested it many times. In 1x1 mm there will be maximum 100 points (depend on surface difficulty) calculated from structure light. It's not direct measurement as in LiDAR scanner. If I set it to 0.05 resolution there will be maximum 400 points in one sq.mm and those points are interpolated and not measured by scanner, and this will put more load to software that it's being export to.