Crisis Over The Atlantic | Air France Flight 66

[@MiniAirCrashInvestigation]

We now have a Discord Server: discord.gg/kQggurk Come on over!

[@ronniewall1481]

LIKE YOUR SHOWS. IM FROM ATLANTA TEXAS HOME OF FIRST AFRICAN FEMALE PILOT.

[@DJRobbie54]

@@ronniewall1481 I love to hear about female Pilots, especially from Africa, they don't cut Corners they go by the book and until you have to improvise to save everyone's life. Nice to hear from you Ronnie wall.

[@aldenconsolver3428]

Now come on - you need to make a video explaining how that university figured out where the spinner was - that's a friggin miracle right there. We got an entire airplane lost somewhere in the South Pacific we haven't been able to find yet - why didn't they put that bunch of scientists on it ??

[@Syclone0044]

Wait WAIT WAIT! You’re telling me a metal piece blows off at 30,000ft and randomly falls somewhere in oh.... I dunno... the SNOWPACK OF GREENLAND, and they were able to precisely locate the spot to begin digging EIGHT FEET DEEP IN HARD PACK SNOW only to discover “Aha! Yes, there it is, as we predicted.”?!?! That photo blew my mind!!!

[@Syclone0044]

For those who don’t live in snowy areas, if you drop a coin in as little as 4” of fluffy snow, you can pretty much kiss it goodbye until Spring. If you dropped your car keys in 1+ foot of snow, you’d likely either need a metal detector or a new set of car keys. Trust me I’ve been there in my hands and knees scraping through the snow right where the object fell and I could not believe how it had effectively vanished in the snow.

[@toomanymarys7355]

@@Syclone0044 you didn't have a metal detector. :) I lost my first nice wireless earbud like that.

[@techhelpportalextras3007]

@@toomanymarys7355 you can get one for not that much

[@jesperhustad]

They found a zone where it could have landed and used a fancy metal detector to find the exact location

[@paulzapodeanu9407]

To be fair, they did look for it, for like, 2 years, but yeah, damn impressive. The video of them digging it out is also on youtube: zPcSU0A1G9w.

[@grandgao3984]

I came from a Materials Science background, and I would say the explanation has been very well placed: informative, scientific & not too difficult to grasp for the general audience. Well done! Looking forward to more of your great videos!

[@RudolfKooijman]

I am a translator, usually of medical and juridical texts, and I have been watching this explanation fascinated. :)

[@Boofedit]

I’m an engineer/ aerospace technical specialist. This pisses me off.

[@eastockerable]

@@Boofedit yes, no real prevention.

[@Tonymakaroni12]

after all this stories about crash tragedies, it makes me happy to hear of a happy ending!

[@liamboyle6345]

Spoiler alert geez

[@ronik24]

@@liamboyle6345 All these cases are well known, and this case from 2017 should still be remembered from the news. Also, we know no A380 has ever crashed, so it is no surprise.

[@MrCallingoccupants]

After your reading your comment about a happy ending, it makes me think about my nights in Thailand.

[@Brtt4849]

@@ronik24 safe planes

[@mw01720]

I love happy endings 😉

[@jemand8462]

the biggest wonder of this all is that they found the fan hub under meters of snow somewhere in greenland. That's just crazy engineering skills.

[@jemand8462]

@Stefan Stefan in terms of what exactly?

[@ted.angell7609]

I’m astonished that they still don’t have observation cameras looking back at 45 degrees from the cockpit so they can get an easy visual of what’s going on with the plane. Wouldn’t take much wiring to do that.

[@ARCANEmateCLAN]

Me too. Such a simple safety measure, and the A380 already has cameras on the top and belly.

[@jemand8462]

@Hansel Franzen what are you talking about? Boeing doesn't have them either and Airbus clearly has made the better aircrafts the last decades.

[@terryofford4977]

@@ARCANEmateCLAN I traveled on a 777 to Vietnam, On a new Air Vietnam aircraft.There was a camera operating from the tail fin and it 'Looked left and right, I haven't seen such a camera operation on any other civilian aircraft, I applaud Air Vietnam for this application, Scenic Views apart, the camera gave excellent views from the tail to the nose and wind tip t0 wing tip. T/O and Landings display actions of airlerons and flaps adequately. How come Air Vietnam can do this and yet I have not witnessed such a device on America, Australian British or New Zealand airliners. Praise toi Vietnam for this appliocation, Nice flight too. Terry Offord

[@rogerscrogham3392]

@@jemand8462 That's clear to you huh? I'm happy for you because it's not clear to me.

[@patrickmollohan3082]

@@ARCANEmateCLAN Can the back of the engines be seen from the tail cam at least? I know it does no good to see damage to the intake cowling, but monitoring/confirming an engine fire perhaps? This is the 2nd or 3rd P&W engine to do.this on an A380. They need to figure some sort of camera system.

[@Nobilangelo]

At times like that, far from land it is good to have four engines not two. Three cheers for the A380!

[@robydee920]

@Isaac Islam 2 engine planes can fly and land with one engine without a lot of trouble.

[@robydee920]

@Nobilangelo Ceramalus Ups I misunderstood you,I drank three beers instead of making three cheers.Hope that counts as well.

[@MrPsarn]

@@robydee920 After 1990, many airlines made it mandatory to know how to land an aircraft on one engine.

[@robydee920]

@@MrPsarn I know.They practice it in simulator many,many times during their carrier.

[@potatopants4691]

In certain cases, you can land a plane on 0 engines

[@Wooksley]

Man is this plane beautiful. It’s a shame they stopped producing it.

[@FelixIsGood]

Yes sad they did not make a more eco-friendly "Neo" version.

[@TheMuzikall]

This is like what Lexus did with the LFA🤣...Airbus wanted to show Boeing what the are capable of😹

[@theavenger5749]

What shame ?

[@Wooksley]

@@theavenger5749 well, I’m sorry. English isn’t my first language. What I meant was that I’d prefer that it was still produced, because it’s a beautiful plane. It’s a pity would be a better way to put it I suppose

[@theavenger5749]

@@Wooksley all right

[@laulau194]

I wonder if Goose Bay gets more emergency landings than scheduled ones... my folks had an unplanned 2 day stopover there a few years back.

[@Roadglide911]

Flew in there ate lunch and was food poisoned.

[@Dr_Nick_]

The majority of emergencies coming in from the Atlantic tend to stop at Goose Bay because it's the first airport with a long enough runway.

[@venomcoasters2117]

This channel is so underrated. Keep up with these great videos

[@mike30534]

For those who complained, you stuck with A380s on screen during the entire video. Looking Great MACI!

[@sarahalbers5555]

Great job. I like the FOR DEC approach explanation, never heard of it, another facet of the CRM model? Glad they landed safely-thanks!

[@initialyeet3951]

Great video! You put a380 footage over it for the whole time. Also I remember having an emergency landing in Goose Bay once.

[@R2Bl3nd]

What an unbelievably deep dive into the root causes! And yet you explained everything perfectly. It's truly miraculous how detailed and meticulous modern investigations are. The craziest thing to me was that they could stimulate the engine failure well enough to track down all the parts of it.

[@valobrien9596]

It's amazing how accurate computer simulations can be, in this case they managed to find a small needle in a giant haystack.

[@Syclone0044]

Val O'Brien I was equally astonished!! I almost fell out of my chair when I saw the photo of the fan hub unearthed below 8 FEET OF SOLID SNOW PACK?!??! 👀😲👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 It continues to amaze me how many people still spout off ignorant opinions like “aw hell, those experts don’t know anything. They’re just paid off by (big conspiracy theory). How many times have they been wrong in the past?” _(implying that anything less than a flawless rate of bulletproof conclusions warrants discrediting all conclusions....and substituting whatever layman idea the fool feels more comfortable believing)._

[@valobrien9596]

@@Syclone0044 That's the truth of it alright. The occasional conspiracy turns out to be true, but the people your talking about are just obsessed with the notion that EVERYTHING you hear is a lie and a conspiracy. They lack the intelligence necessary for rational thinking. The people who found those engine parts have demonstrated how bulletproof their methods are.

[@egvijayanand]

Simply amazing. Appreciation to everyone who involved in tackling the issue and unraveling the mystery behind it. Nice presentation with the all the facts.

[@egvijayanand]

Flight crew, air traffic controllers, ground crew, crash investigators, those incredible mathematicians, scientists who designed the titanium detectors, search team, and the scientific community that analyzed and arrived at the facts make air travel much more safe. 👏👏👏

[@GaryNumeroUno]

Sounds almost identical to what happened to Qantas A380 flight 32 ex Singapore when number 1 engine tore itself to bits.

[@julianfierro7034]

I don't know what your background is, but this was a good, concise explanation of the event

[@Larpy1933]

Another fascinating and informative video. Thanks. The videography accompanying your work is indeed superb. Good luck, SIR!

[@valobrien9596]

And thank you for a very informative and clearly explained analysis of this incident. 👍

[@aldenconsolver3428]

.76 mm subsurface sounds a lot like the crack started under a surface hardening operation. Just almost no way one could see that with any kind of normal inspection. Its always a good time to have a good crew that was well trained and Air France had really done their job.

[@eyetrapper]

Great work once again man! Climbing high on those subs 👀

[@MiniAirCrashInvestigation]

Couldn’t have done it without your help mate!

[@surferdude4487]

I couldn't click on your video fast enough. Great work once again!

[@WolfandCatUnite]

Your video's are the best. Keep up the great work.

[@fikuszkukisz11]

I was on the plane, still have kind of PTSD from this incident. Huge thanks to the professional pilots and crew

[@1CatSitter]

Tell us more

[@Ben-ks5bm]

No you where not.

[@fikuszkukisz11]

@@Ben-ks5bm yes, I wHas

[@DilupthaPerera]

Another brilliant piece of crew resource management.

[@thegeneralbenjamin9518]

Another great video. I miss all of the jumbos flying around

[@terryofford4977]

Am with you in this regard. I Loved the 747's,seems only a short while ago I filmed the first short Haul Version 747 landing at Wellington, New Zealand's main airport, a 6000'ft runway, SEA at both ends, the aircraft was only half loaded due to short T/O and Landing run,I was informed it carried a half load.Wow, that was in 1970/71, so sad to witness the Jumbo's being rip Terry Offord

[@patrickmollohan3082]

@@terryofford4977 Well, at least Cargo airlines are going with 747 freighter conversions. And I believe they may have come up with a way to convert A380 into freighters. So jumbos ain't all gone yet. Cargo lines can get these planes at a decent price, soak another million or 2 for the conversion, they will pay for themselves.after a short time.✈✈✈

[@FlywithMagnar]

Just a minor correction: FCTM stands for Flight Crew Training Manual.

[@davidh6300]

I'm super impressed that they found the fan hub in the wilderness under many metres of snow.

[@martinlintzgy1361]

Absolutely fascinating. Fantastic research 🙂

[@kernow9324]

I'm a nervous flyer but I cannot stop watching these videos!

[@hreader]

Very impressive recovery operation for the fan hub fragment!

[@daphnethurlow5388]

I am..just amazed at all your knowledge .!

[@Fennexin]

I absolutely adore the A380. I hope I'll be able to fly in one before they're all retired.

[@davidnavarro4821]

Me too! Lufthansa has the3rd largest A380 fleet and its national country is next to mine so I might try one day!

[@DJRobbie54]

I must say, that watching your videos is very informative, very enjoyable to hear an explanation of the issues that happen with small-medium and large airplanes in service. You do a very good job, In explaining what's going on when these issues happen. Thank you very much for your informative and well-thought-out videos of Aviation. Keep The Videos Coming.

[@daveroche6522]

Excellent report - thank you.

[@lucas29476]

2:09 in this situation, you should provide the unusual acronym on-screen for better viewing experience

[@drnogueiras8783]

Largest passenger plane, I’m assuming was meant. I love how to the point these videos are. And I love that I can watch them over and over because of my short term memory loss

[@forensix78]

24 people had minor “injuries”. AKA, 24 frivolous hopes of a payout from Air France.

[@warrenmacdonald1372]

Was it a Rolls engine? If so, was it one of the engines that had its oil delivery system pipe wall manufactured with too little inside diameter on one side, causeing it to rupture? There were about 45 Rolls engines that had this problem on A380's.

[@alanc.1213]

No it was Engine Alliance, Pratt & whitney/ General Electric. Air France buys American engines when they can......Yes, they hate the English!!!!

[@sumpyman]

@@alanc.1213 Yep. It's strange how Rolls gets a bad press but this event is generally less well known

[@70slandshark47]

Yes,, Rolls-Royce did have a problem with oil delivery on their engines but it was corrected. Historically Rolls-Royce is a very reliable and resilient engine.

[@gablalonde4265]

Awesome video as always. That A380 footage is at my local airport in Montréal, Canada

[@nottcurious5284]

Just when I was looking for something to watch!

[@Rorschach1024]

In the rest of the world that alloy is known as 6Al-4V (6%aluminum, 4% Vanadium, Titanium is the remainder). It can also be embrittled with contact with Methanol which is commonly used in de-icing aircraft.

[@jtveg]

Very informative. Thanks for sharing. 😉👌🏼

[@tonycerino9645]

That's one big ass plane damn!!

[@jaredhuang2225]

Excellent explanation as usual

[@TheNefastor]

That is one resilient aircraft, when you look at the damage !

[@jacktumbouniversal2149]

Keep up the good work ... u make my work hours pass easyer so big thanks bro ... u should do horror stories too :)

[@patrickmollohan3082]

Seems to me that any show on plane crashes would qualify as horror.

[@dennischallinor8497]

A few years ago there was talk of closing Goose Bay, not a good idea methinks, Gimli Glider comes to mind.

[@fikuszkukisz11]

I was on the plane, happy to be alive 🥳🥳

[@elizabethannferrario7113]

thank goodness all were safe .

[@torgeirbrandsnes1916]

Great vlog as always!

[@Democracyyy]

Amazing video

[@DJ-bh1ju]

You mentioned injuries... How did they get injured? Did fragments penetrate the cabin? You didn't mention a hard descent, either...

[@KenColton]

Wait, how did 24 people suffer minor injuries? Did they do an emergency evacuation or something? Seems like it wouldn’t have been needed?

[@amazinginformation2024]

As someone who flies little piston planes, I see this thing and could not imagine ever piloting an aircraft as enormous as that. The pilots that fly these planes are on X Games mode.

[@prof.m.ottozeeejcdecs9998]

It is ALWAYS just a matter of time for something to go wrong! Material fatigue is very common. That is why 1st class maintenance is crucial!

[@steves659]

How did 24 people get minor injuries? Nothing entered the cabin ...????

[@PeterWalkerHP16c]

That was tame. QF32 was a wee bit more tricky.

[@peter-e2q]

24 passengers injured from what?

[@brentsummers7377]

The Wikipedia article says no injuries, so I think this might be an error. There were 24 crew on the plane so perhaps he meant to say something about how all the passengers and 24 crew survived?

[@Man-go-Everywhere]

Fragile Egos

[@peter-e2q]

@@Man-go-Everywhere I like that term! Very apt.

[@TheFULLMETALCHEF]

Didn’t know this about titanium alloys-thanks!

[@johndevane9589]

Correct me if I'm wrong: not once did you mention the engine model & manufactures?

[@taketimeout2share]

I guess most people including myself thought this was another Rolls Royce engine failure. It wasn't. These are Pratt and Whitney/General Electric engines and the failure was far more serious, injuring 22 of the passengers. The RR engines were simply oil starvation but does the inspection to fan hubs relate to all A380s or just those with this engine as you didn't mention the engine manufacturers at all in the video?

[@kokohale]

It was so fascinating to see the innovations in French aviation and aviation investigation. It's usually the NTSB because of planes and airlines involved and the American exceptionalism can be...tiring

[@AntCooke]

Really interesting video.

[@MUSTBUYRIGHT]

You said they were to far out for voice transmission. Why? Can you find out . I thought there's satellites up there just for problems like this.

[@MiniAirCrashInvestigation]

Hey they use VHF or very high frequency radios those signals attenuate after a while and so their range is limited. Satellite based communication is more for diagnostic and info and maybe contacting the airline dispatch or HQ in some other corner of the world

[@MUSTBUYRIGHT]

@@MiniAirCrashInvestigation thanks ,but it still doesn't make since to me. I thought satellites created an environment for worldwide communication and in other words we're still using the cables that were placed.

[@A.Lifecraft]

@@MUSTBUYRIGHT Wait till Starlink is complete, they might then have live-8K-videostream from any cockpit cloudsaved as an easier alternative to CVR...

[@joecrammond6221]

when i first heard about this flight, my first thought was the similarities to Qantas 32

[@divyeshpatel147]

Little bit different as QF32 has faulty stub pipe which broke cause excessive rotation of turbine disk which broke violently and puncture wing and disable multiple systems while flight 66 has metal fatigue which rips off outer cover and fan hub

[@joecrammond6221]

as i said, my first impression was another qantas 32 but this video has certainly taught me something new

[@sumpyman]

@@divyeshpatel147 @Divyesh Kodinaria technically, the turbine didn't over speed. The lack of cooling oil to the turbine bearing, or the oil leaking around the bearing housing caused an overheat / fire that changed the metallurgical properties of the turbine disc and that caused it to fracture.

[@deaf2819]

@@sumpyman after measuring have you figured out whose micro penis is smaller ?

[@sumpyman]

@@deaf2819 Between the three of us? Im in 2nd place with you leading 'big' man.

[@mysupersuperglide]

How did people get injured?

[@Ben-ks5bm]

Hurt feelings probably

[@kevinbarry71]

Those pilots did a much better job than their colleagues on flight 447

[@theinfiniteflightdeck]

Completely different circumstances. You can’t compare an engine failure to something like what happened on AF447.

[@kevinbarry71]

@@theinfiniteflightdeck right, on 447 no engines failed; just the ability of the pilots to fly the airplane fail

[@theinfiniteflightdeck]

Yes, but it’s a completely different set of circumstances. You can’t compare how people perform in different situations.

[@kevinbarry71]

@@theinfiniteflightdeck that's why pilots are trained and paid so well. 447 pilots failed completely in every regard. Just say you cannot compare is simply wrong.

[@Ben-ks5bm]

French pilots are terrible, bonin was a joker

[@mrkongsimr]

With all the cameras around today , I'm so surprised that planes don't have cameras to see all engines and other major parts incase of an emergency to evaluate a problem . Today they have to have it from the staff or passenger if an engine falls off . What do you think ?

[@PAVANZYL]

Safest plane ever!

[@edwardlewis1963]

@6:15 "alloy called T-i-6-4" Ti64? something missing there? Ti6Fe4 maybe? from google, looks like the 6 refers to 6 aluminum, and the 4 for 4 vanadium. TiAl6V4

[@MiniAirCrashInvestigation]

The final report and all scientific journals refer to it as ti64 I forgot the exact element it’s alloyed with

[@adamw.8579]

@@MiniAirCrashInvestigation Ti-6Al-4V is most widely used titanium alloy in aircraft industry. It's alpha-beta type alloy, common problem is cooling thick pieces fast enough to prevent form beta crystals. Border zone between two types of crystallize area must be located in certain area of piece, with minimal working stress. Wrong cooling profile is considered as manufacturing flaw and leads to premature fatigue crack.

[@Lazy_Tim]

Have you covered Qantas Flight 32?

[@Boofedit]

Wait, how did 24 people get injured? What happened, turbulence?

[@frank-vq4mx]

Airbus installed a camera on the vertical fin so that the passengers could see what the takeoff or maybe, even the lading looks like from the outside.. If they went to this length to install this camera to amuse the passengers, than whey haven't they and or Boeing installed cameras at strategic locations throughout the air frame to monitor engines, wings and even the landing gear ?.Tell me this isn't a cost issue. This way the flight crew could see for themselves, in real time, what was happening outside the aircraft.

[@xsu-is7vq]

Exactly. They should have camera monitoring all important flight control surfaces, engines, landing gears, and the fuselage. They should also have cameras looking at the 360 degree airspace around the aircraft and use AI recognition software to help identify objects getting close.

[@terryofford4977]

Air Vietnam have a camera (Tail Mounted, it displays all the AIrcraft clearly, the aircraft travelled on was a 777 and the first occasion I have seen the application of a camera showing t/o and landings along with general scenic views, this was five years ago too. Terry Offord

[@Patrick_Schaefer]

Many recent planes have camera systems on the tail, nose, bottom that can be watched in the inflight entertainment systems. In fact, American Airlines installed a forward facing camera in their DC-10 in the 1970s for passenger entertainment. The feature was removed soon after its start after AA flight 110 in 1979, where passengers were forced to witness their own crash. This also is the reason why today the cameras cut out during take-off and landing. The use of cameras for pilots can be debated. It may add to understanding in some cases, but it surely will serve as a distraction in other. Bear in mind that a camera will not show vibrations or „internal“ problems of components. The detail level is rather low, and in low light or bad weather it is useless. Even when you can see an issue on screen, it does not help to resolve it. Furthermore, constantly watching a damaged part can preoccupy the flight crew or worse, leave them hopeless or shocked.

[@frank-vq4mx]

@@Patrick_Schaefer At least they will know what they're dealing with !!

[@Patrick_Schaefer]

@@frank-vq4mx That’s a case by case in my opinion. I am not saying cameras are a bad idea, but given all the effort spent to constantly improve safety in aviation, and given how obvious a camera might help to assess damage in certain cases (just look in the comments here), I am sure it was looked into more than once, and dismissed for a reason. Sure, there are some failures which you might see (i.e. uncontained engine failure/ fire, major wing damage or such). In the described AF flight, the flight crew got an image of the failed engine. But they had taken the correct steps before that, they also knew which engine was affected. In other cases the plane would look perfectly normal, or the issue would be so small that it will be overlooked in the heat of the moment. In a lot of accidents it is not a lack of information that led to a bad ending.

[@chrisc8425]

It’s only a suggestion but I think a collab between you and 3 greens would be a great video ? 👀

[@FloridaCatholicGuy]

My dad was stationed in Goose Bay when he was in the Air Force.

[@Mizai]

nice video as always

[@surferdude4487]

Hurray for the people at Goose Bay. They have come through in many crisies.

[@briancarno8837]

The guys on th Air France 330 that crashed into the atlantic must have missed this part of their training

[@dml5583]

1 disinterested Captain, 1 pilot who was now doing something else full time, and 1 very inexperienced pilot will sometimes not respond to stall warnings and use flight director no matter what

[@Ben-ks5bm]

@@dml5583 and French to boot

[@charlesmoss8119]

This was a second big a380 failure on what are all relatively fresh aircraft with two different engine makes - it can’t be the plane but is the stress in some way greater ? (I can’t do Lego so I have no engineering knowledge)

[@isilder]

Btw,airbus computer will fly quite well with just an engine failure. If an Uncontained explosion... It cant actually repair damage ... Qantas qf2 at singapore... Airbus..it was quite damaged due to engine explosion but still, the other engine and wing was fine. So the airbus computer put it down safely

[@PeterNGloor]

can this incident be compared with the Qantas one?

[@Bob31415]

So upon analyzing the fan hub damage did they just ignore the fact that it fell from 38,000 ft?

[@divox9pqr]

Why did this happen? Was this a preventative maintenance issue? Is this a characteristic of Air France in general?

[@OM-of8vf]

No this is a type of microstructural defect in titanium alloys. Not related specifically to Air France or any specific airlines company.

[@stevebroadbent5080]

Which engine were AF running? Rollers, or the US mix?

[@THIRV]

US mix 👍

[@phugoid]

But why were 24 persons on board injured, though? Really strange!

[@PassiveSmoking]

Doesn't sound like debris entered the cabin, otherwise they'd have had to make a rapid emergency descent. I'm guessing people got injured in the evacuation? It's generally accepted that an evacuation via slides will typically result in 10% of the people aboard an aircraft sustaining minor injuries. The other possibility that springs to mind is the initial engine failure caused a large upset and unrestrained people were flung around.

[@phugoid]

@@PassiveSmoking Well, I just checked my one source of reliable information (avherald.com/h?article=4af15205) and there's no mention of any injuries. The pax disembarked through stairs, so it's good that there was no silly evacuation through slides

[@gilbertfranklin1537]

Probably they were the passengers who had a lawyer friend. Like the Walmart shopper who tripped and fell. When they went to help him, they asked if he needed a doctor. He said; "Yes, but call my lawyer first!".

[@sarahalbers5555]

There were 24 crew members, 497 passengers.

[@brow1920]

He literally just made that up. There were 24 crew. No injuries. Either that or he just had terrible reading comprehension - it's a theme in most of his videos.

[@YourBelugawhale]

Its Still Safe To Fly!

[@Musikur]

I don't think you mentioned the engine manufacturer in this?

[@charleshultquist9233]

What cause the 24 injuries? shrapnel?

[@jaumesol3480]

How were 24 people injured?

[@brow1920]

They weren't hurt. The guy who makes these videos has terrible reading comprehension. There were 24 crew members - no injuries. He just misread it. He does that a LOT in his videos. They're borderline bullshit videos sometimes he's so inaccurate.

[@A.Lifecraft]

@@brow1920 On many cheap clickbait channels, i wonder if it's even a real person reading. These often sound like primary school essays read out by a computer. MACI at least has relevant content although the reading is occasionally erratic...

[@planck39]

Mmmh?? Not familiar with the approach to a diversion airport on Greenland?

[@cristelvideo]

A lot to be said for having 4 engines on long routes.

[@sexysilversurfer]

But airlines hate 4 engines as they use more fuel.

[@johannesbols57]

Since there wasn't an emergency evacuation, what were the injuries the 24 passengers suffered?

[@peterguirguess853]

Cramps they suffered through cramps during the plane crash and want monetary damages.

[@michaelosgood9876]

A more competent crew than that same airlines A330 crew over the Atlantic A few years ago. Has to be said.

[@scoopydaniels8908]

I know you've been using this to also perfect your English, so I thought I would let you know. The words duel/dual are pronounced dool. Keep up the good work by the way.

[@catweaselnz]

Down here in New Zealand is pronounced more like jewel 😁

[@scoopydaniels8908]

@@catweaselnz but you guys are weirdos.. Also, dual is more like jewel.. You're right! ❤️

[@jenniferyearout7681]

@@catweaselnz well, you’re upside down, so there’s that

[@OM-of8vf]

Sorry, but it is actually dwell fatigue, not duel or dual.

[@GmRb79]

as an industrial engineer (people vs machines) its quite unacceptable that the SUPPLIER did not check their ti64 alloys for poor macro structures. Quite pathetic. And so is Air France for having poor receipt and quality procedures. No one goes unscathed.

[@jamesstuart3346]

They selected Goose Bay because the people are super nice!

[@andrewdillon7837]

So how hard could it be to put some kind of webcam on the plane to be able to see the engines ,and rear stabilizers . Same for the inside of an aircraft,,cant be that hard, wireless tech and all nowadays...

[@Nobilangelo]

True, but at least the A380 has a camera high in the tail, so they do have that view.

[@hossahunter22]

how did 24 people receive injuries?

[@TimothyChapman]

This is why you *NEVER* make assumptions in the field of science.