Cycling Fail #4 | This Shared Path Is Mine! Take 2 | Because of a Copyright Strike!

This video was uploaded onto my main account, a couple of weeks back, but was subject to a copyright strike. This has now been amicably sorted out with the clip owner. This is where the 'Cycling Fail' series will be from now on.
Nathaniel Clelend - / @bellezzasolo
Camera Affiliate Links.
Motorcycle, Bicycle and Equestrian - Techalogic - techalogic.co....
Car - Viofo - viofouk.co.uk/...
Motorcycle - Innov - innovv.co.uk/a...

[@kenbrown2808]

to summarize the first clip - the cyclist did everything they'd pitch a fit over a motorist doing to them. the other noteworthy one was the kid wheelying down a sidewalk (pavement) and trying to bunny hop through a van that had been clearly signaling a left turn. and the moral of that story is, motorists are required to drive with care for vulnerable road users, but it's impossible for motorists to protect them from themselves.

[@frenchdave69]

It looks to me that the cyclist doesn't understand the meaning of the blue 'shared path' sign on the lamp post - it clearly indicates that it is a *shared* path and not a *segregated* path. I wonder if the cyclist also assumed that cycle symbol painted on the path meant that it was solely a cycle path and not a shared path.

[@shm5547]

@@frenchdave69 yep, it’s a poorly signed cycle track and no matter the layout, this rider was being a nob. It’s outside the tomorrow building in Salford. I had a gander on street view and there are advisory “cyclists dismount “ signs at a traffic light controlled crossing that you can legally cycle over! It’s better than no infrastructure, but I would probably cycle on the roads here.

[@kenbrown2808]

@@frenchdave69 well, I'm sure the cyclist assumed he was entitled to have the path all to himself.

[@sillybait1329]

​@@kenbrown2808 and the road which he nearly decorated with his blood

[@engineeredlifeform]

Yeah, that BMX kid, must think he lives in a consequence free environment, and other people are going to make everything safe for him. I see it too often from all road users, they think if they encroach, put themselves in danger, everyone will fix their problems, and 99% of the time they are right. It's the 1% they need to worry about.

[@matthewb4657]

I love the community over on Ashley's driving channel where everyone is striving to be safer drivers. But it's amazing how toxic it can get over here on the cycling channel. It seems some believe that cyclists should never be criticised. There's always room for improvement no matter how good you think you are.

[@picklestheswift]

Good to know that the cycling fail videos will be uploaded on this channel 👍 Glad the copyright is sorted

[@JonnyUnforeseen]

I thinks its probably for the best that the "cycling fail" series is on this channel. It seems that these compilation style videos do well with the algorithm, so it might help grow this channel faster.

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

Personally I’d prefer them to try to educate cyclists rather than fuel the angry motorists even further 👍

[@JonnyUnforeseen]

​​@@AshleyNeal-JustCycling I wasn't in my comment implying that you were releasing these videos for views btw, just incase it comes across that way. I'm saying it's a good thing that more people watch this educational cycling channel, as a cyclist myself, that's why I'd like to see it grow.

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

I got that anyway! Thanks

[@Echo_5674]

I agree with you there mate, people who say there aren't blindspots are absolutely off their rocker.

[@EpeP-qs9xb]

SMIDSY?

[@stevekenilworth]

there is but no reason to miss someone because of it. use mirrors often you see them enter your blind spot then that lane is closed till you see them ahead or far behind and you monitor all traffic around you and you should always know what around you at all times. even trucker 40 years agrees and when he started trucks had tiny mirrors but he said he knew what was always around him, he said if you miss someone your not using mirrors enough as you should seen them enter blind spot, should keep track them all around you

[@Torsan1977]

Giving space, priority and extra consideration to pedestrians (when cycling) is very fulfilling to me. A smile, a nod, a wave and a thank you. It's quite personal, and you make not only someone else´s day better, but also you own. I'm not in that place with drivers though. The fact that if you make a mistake you kill me, and if I make one you also kill me is not a good starting point for a good relationship.

[@cyclecam6328]

Glad to have the update on the last clip with the extra info. I did think passing where he did could be ok, you really have to be extra aware of the pedestrians and for signs that the driver might not have seen you. Doing it for the right reasons is important too; not to show off but because you want to make better progress. The risk has to be worth the reward.

[@smilerbob]

Good news the copyright issue has been dealt with amicably as all disputes should be 👍

[@smilerbob]

And having heard the dispute at the end of the video it is a massive 👍 from me to the viewer also for allowing the clip to remain and discussing the issues directly with you

[@Azphreal]

I love how many cyclists seems to think they 'understand' the rules that came in but forget that pedestrians are more important in the hierarchy and it also states that they still have to take responsibility for their own actions and safety. I am sick of cyclists who just pull out in front of me and act like i am in the wrong, what if i it and killed someone.

[@K.Pilkington]

I'm confused with the last clip. Did Nathaniel submit a copyright notice himself because he didn't agree with your views? Then allowed you to re-upload if you were more positive about it?

[@shaunmorgan2202]

I'm registered blind (having some vision) and am now in my 50s. I would say that over the past 15 to 20 years cyclists have caused me the most issues through inconsideration and misuse of foot paths and junctions. There seems to be a general lack of regard and perhaps an increasing attitude of self righteousness by a lot of cyclists. I think if the apparent trend increases cyclists may find themselves the focus of legislation, and I think that would be a shame.

[@shm5547]

That’s a shame to hear you’ve had problems. Of course cycling on foot paths is perfectly legal unless there is a red circle sign prohibiting it. Cyclists are already subject to legislation for riding on footways, but if done carefully, the police guidelines allow it. I would suggest a body camera, just as cyclists use bike cameras, so you can report these issues. As a cyclist, I always ride carefully around pedestrians, however I have noticed a growing number of inconsiderate pedestrians who are ignorant of their duty to be aware of their environment and not impede cyclists (rule 13). But there is no legislation for this, until the worst happens such as the Auriol Grey case. I can see pedestrians having greater legislation applied to them in the wake of that case.

[@insoft_uk]

@@shm5547 The Highway Code states: “You must not cycle on a pavement.”

[@shm5547]

@@insoft_uk I know, it's an area of the Highway Code that needs updating. The police guidance has been for many years that no cyclist will be prosecuted for cycling carefully on a footway. The law only teniously prohibits cycling on a footway; it doesn't mention bicycles at all (in fact, the law is so old it pre-dates the existence of bicycles!). It was originally designed to keep horse drawn carriages and sledges off the footway. As it's worded, it would also prohibit pulling a child along the pavement in a sledge on a snowy day!

[@rufusgreenleaf2466]

​@@insoft_uk If that's the case it needs updating.

[@sillybait1329]

​@@shm5547 how can you say inconsiderate pedestrians ? The hierarchy laws protect them from moving vehicles especially on a footpath which you should not be cycling on unless its a shared pathway

[@Species1571]

Don't really see how the clip was a copyright strike. Seems more like he spat the dummy because of your criticism. If you had been on his side, I'd bet money there would be no strike. Clear abuse of the copyright claim system.

[@phillwainewright4221]

There's a shared path where I live. It's got a white line down the middle with 'pedestrian' and 'cyclist' markings on either side every 20 yards or so. No arguing about who should be where.

[@mrcellophane99]

A couple of points for you to expand on 1:42 - if that had been a pedestrian and not a cyclist were would you expect them to be walking on that road with no path (please don't say the grass verge as there could be mud or holes there) 3:50 - could you highlight the problems created by not regularly changing wiper blades 4:08 - the cyclist is riding, all be it slowly, correctly away from the door zone. A beep would be, quite correctly, taken as impatience from the driver. 4:54 - if the dash cam in that lorry is positioned in the centre of the windscreen, then that is not good space and distance. 6:19 - a good example of why advance stop zone should be created at all traffic lights, particularly those with filter lights.

[@TimpBizkit]

1:42 on the other side of the road to the left of the painted white line, as soon as there is a chance to cross. 3:50 it is important to have working wiper blades for good visibility in rain. 4:08 a few pedal strokes to get 'er up to speed wouldn't go amiss. 4:54 it's hard to see where the left of the lorry is and it's also important not to tuck back in too soon lest the back end of the trailer gets dangerously close to them. 6:19 they'd be better off in the right hand lane so that people turning left can go.

[@kinder7]

I recently had to jump into a lorry passenger seat for a few moments to direct it, for the first time I noticed how small bicycles look from up there, definitely taught me to be even more careful around lorries while in my bike.

[@BobMc87]

I'm seriously appalled at that cyclist coming up the inside of the HGV on the roundabout. How much more must HGV driver have to endure to protect these people with death wishes. In the years HGV drivers have had Proximity sensors fitted down the nearside of the vehicle to create an audio warning when cyclists come down the near side, which constantly beeps when manoeuvring in tight spaces, which is utterly annoying! Then we have nearside cameras, with a monitor on the dash board, which lights up the cab at night the second you indicate left, even on a motorway. Then we have these ridiculous warning alarms that shout "CAUTION! VEHICLE TURNING LEFT!" when you indicate left. Next fleet of trucks we get will now have windows carved into the doors to add to the drivers responsibility to check, like six mirrors and a monitor isn't enough, while various alarms are skreetching in your ears! What point to we say to suicidal cyclists, Right....take some responsibility for yourselves? Honestly! What next are they going to force onto HGV drivers to protect these cyclists? That guy on that bike is despicable!

[@youknow6968]

Regarding the cyclist hitting the turning van. The footpath was quiet high, and had a curve I think, can be difficult to see, because the cyclist was coming quiet fast, and the cyclist would have been quiet far back when he was in line of sight for the side mirror, after the turn had began surely the line of sight for the driver would have changed. Plus, lot of drivers are obsessed with getting the door handles fully within view, which can also limit the side viewing area. If it helps their driving, it's ok, I suppose. Ultimately everyone, including cyclists, and pedestrians much play their part in creating safe road environment.

[@TimpBizkit]

I had a cycling fail of my own in Bath back in the day. I was bombing a hill and traffic had stopped round the corner. I didn't have enough braking room so had to pass on the right, making a bus driver stop.

[@Zeyr01]

"No such things as blind spots" that is some gigacope right there.

[@beardyface8492]

First clip, that clearly used to be a segregated path with a line separating cyclists & pedestrians, I'm wondering if the cyclist hasn't mentally adjusted to the change of sign and (incomplete) removal of the line. He'd have still been in the wrong acting as he did even with a segregated path & pedestrian in the "wrong" side of it, but that could go some way towards explaining why he thought he was justified in shouting. It's not any cyclist's (or driver's) place to try to police the actions of others & this could very obviously have been two people passing with no incident or interaction at all had the cyclist had a different attitude.

[@cornishalps9870]

It pains me to call anyone in this video a cyclist. It's unfair that the actions of a few can affect my experience on the road.

[@StupendousPedro]

Great video ❤ as a delivery driver that cycles to work your channels have certainly helped me improve my driving and cycling 🙏 keep up the great work.

[@Rhyd]

Well this is going to start a fit on twitter 😂

[@alicat749]

I love cycling but totally agree share means share, take care of yourself and others. There are few places we can get the best out of our bikes, roads too dangerous and on shared paths we become the danger. Sadly my commute is now by car sitting for hours in queue' s of traffic.

[@raithrover1976]

I commute by bike and use shared paths for about half of my 8 mile journey. I always make a point of setting off 10 minutes early so i can just relax and meander around the other path users, (including the dogs!) without feeling stressed about being late for work.

[@Nickle314]

When you are down in London, Old Kent Road, 8-9am you get thousands of offences.

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

I'll have to try it at some point.

[@Nickle314]

@@AshleyNeal-JustCycling It's bad. A friend and neighbour got hit by an illegal electric motorbike on the pavement. Hamza is now in a wheelchair and needs help to go to the shops. Completely out of control. Worse that Cardiff

[@Chigleybus]

8:12 result! 🤭

[@stevedouglas3975]

As a cyclist I get my share of close passes from motorists but some cyclists are their own worst enemies and put themselves in danger plus annoy other road users with their behaviour which then unfortunately tars us all with same brush in eyes of some motorists. Cyclists are vunerable road users so should ride accordingly, sorry to say a lot don't.

[@Chigleybus]

Spot on. Most, not all, of the people riding bikes in these films are not cyclists. I realise that sounds pompous but you know what I mean. The majority of cyclists who do it as a regular hobby and often ride more miles in a year than many people drive, take a pride in their use of the road, their bike/appearance and their consideration for other road users. But drivers tend to remember the red light jumping, misuse of junctions, wheelies et al, and then we're all tarred with the same shitty brush.

[@Mesofs9]

It seems both cyclists and car drivers in the UK have not enough training, experience etc on how each other is behaving. Or even knowing each others linits. Kind regards from the Netherlands

[@AdeboFunkyVoodoo]

I think the cyclist probably thought that the different surfaces on the footway (there are clear light and dark areas) represented the demarcation between a cycle lane and a footpath. Rathwr than it being a shared use footway. He's made an error. But, as there are no legal standards for signage and marking on footways, it is a mistake which is very easy to make as there is no commonality in what does or does not indicate a seperate cycle lane and delimit its boundry. The problem here is, a lack of standards and legislation. The law literally states, that there is no requirement to have any signage in the footway at all. This needs to change and universal markings (as with the carriageway) need to be adopted. I understand his initial confusion, but a little more observation and he would have spotted the sign on the post, which does indicate that it is a mixed/shared use footway.

[@DavidBrown-sr8di]

Try walking down canal paths , with E bikes , bullying cyclists ringing bells , while going at high speed

[@alanedwards3180]

I noticed in your last video on cyclists how they can not take criticism .i read the comments and they couldn't wait to gang up on you . There are good and bad car drivers , bike , motorbike and truck drivers on the road , take the criticism on the chin and learn from it instead of jumping on people all the time because you dont agree . I drive a car ,ride a motorcycle and drive artics for a living , am i perfect,No . But i always try to be considerate to others

[@GoosePlays20]

I always stay behind lorry’s and buses

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

Especially when they are moving 👍

[@GoosePlays20]

@@AshleyNeal-JustCycling yes

[@GoosePlays20]

@@AshleyNeal-JustCycling do you have discord?

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

I don't

[@flatinsixth]

There is a road near me, 40 limit, that was once a long unbroken road leading to a 60 limit, but has since had homes built and mini roundabouts put in, and dedicated cycle and walkways. Yet cyclists (the faster breed) insist on using the road I guess to avoid the slower recreational riders etc. It was put there to avoid accidents as its not the widest of roads and a 40 limit but regularly exceeded to the former 60 and probably beyond. I use it regularly on motorbike and in car, and even traverse the cycle way on it with my son, and walk it sometimes! Always drivers being held back and getting annoyed at the cycle bikes. Its not even that long a road, probably 2 miles, but get ahead mindset and all that. And you'd soon get stuck in traffic after it anyway. Hey ho.

[@j2w1_lub]

I was wondering why the original wasn't posted on this channel...

[@SteveBrill]

I’m a keen road cyclist and I get annoyed when I see cyclists doing stupid things. It gives us all a bad name and the keyboard warriors have a field day, shouting about ‘road tax and insurance and we shouldn’t be on the roads’! But as a law abiding cyclist, it can be very scary when you get a dangerous pass from a motorist, so we all need to understand what it is like for ALL road users. Share the road safely and the world will be a better place. Well done Ash for helping people understand the consequences if you don’t abide with the law.

[@SaviourInDistress]

It would still be good to have an identifier such as a licence plate on bikes so that these dangerous cyclists can get consequences that arent death or dismemberment.

[@mikewade777]

@@SaviourInDistress wouldn't change a thing.

[@SaviourInDistress]

@@mikewade777 so cyclists would still cycle like morons? I actually think it would work as a deterrent and frankly is an important change to make. Cyclists need to be held accountable for breaking laws the same way cars are.

[@mikewade777]

@@SaviourInDistress would not work, it doesn't work for motorist it won't work for cyclists.

[@SaviourInDistress]

@@mikewade777 better than nothing. At least makes cyclists recognisable so they can get a police warning at the very least. And its idiotic to say it doesnt work for drivers. It doesnt work for all drivers but i assure you if drivers werent identifiable and essentially anonymous like cyclists they would absolutely drive more recklessly. Im here for equality not the cycle master race. Maybe you should try and think of how to actually change shit instead of just hating on everything

[@looneytoons2878]

All ways wear a high viz yellow jacket

[@Mr.1.i]

It should be law when cycling u must wear a hi viz jacket or vest

[@cyclingSausage]

That last clip looked fine to me, rightly or wrongly I'd have cycled the same way.

[@hotpotato4027]

My true story, I saw a black man in black clothing on a black bike on an unlit road!! Where would a driver stand if the cyclist had been hit whilst pulling any of the crazy stuff in your video? Probably found guilty of driving without due care and attention! I remember taking my cycling proficiency test as youngster at school, where did that sensible and valuable piece of education disappear to, it’s needed now more than ever IMO. What happened to the grey van is what happened to me when a cyclist hit my car, I pleaded guilty to driving without due care and attention to minimise punishment and costs, under advisement, as cyclists are favoured in vehicle cyclist accidents..

[@johncarnie3726]

1st clip - It's clearly a shared path - well signposted - but there seems to be no dividing lines actually on the path - therefore the cyclist was just being a pr*ck!

[@kenbrown2808]

the final clip IS a high risk overtake, but as he pointed out that he had been trudging along behind slower moving cars for quite a distance, it is an understandable situation.

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

It's a low risk overtake if you ignore the point I made about pedestrians stepping out from the left.

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

Risk ignored by CykelTony then. Standard in the pursuit of pace. Edit-typo

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

Look at all the toxic crew in the house

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

On a cycling fail video, you only comment on this clip 😂. Keep that open mindedness.

[@kenbrown2808]

@@AshleyNeal-JustCycling from the left or from the right, and keep in mind antique cars usually have very poor mirrors.

[@thomaselliot2257]

Respect to you for admitting that you can get things wrong sometimes , but I agree with you that was it really worth it overtaking the vintage cars . Another thing I notice that alot of cyclists don't have the proper head gear. Why do they risk head injury when it is a simple matter to fit the right helmet. Wonder why it is not mandatory like motor bike helmets .

[@kenbrown2808]

because every time it gets brought up there is a mob of cyclists claiming they shouldn't have to because it doesn't affect anyone else if they choose to increase their risk. ashley's point about the effects on the driver of the car in a fatal crash notwithstanding.

[@shm5547]

vintage cars stink - the fumes they pump out are horrific. I would not cycle behind them, either stop and wait for them to get far enough ahead and the fumes to disperse, or get quickly past.

[@roelsch]

Superficially a helmet law makes sense, but it just… doesn’t seem to work: - New Zealand introduced a helmet law. What they observed is: (1) somehow a lot of people stopped cycling around that time, and (2) despite helmet use going up to almost 100%, there was no noticeable drop in head injury. - Cycling is roughly as dangerous as walking, when it comes to head injuries. The fact that nobody is calling for a pedestrian helmet law should raise a red flag. - It is estimated that cycling in New Zealand (with a helmat law) is 10 to 15 times more dangerous than in the Netherlands (without helmet law). (appx. 0.15 vs 0.012 deaths per million km). So compared to other things, helmets have only a tiny effect. And if you want to get people to wear bike helmets, you have to convince them that cycling is dangerous enough to warrant wearing a helmet. However *the normal response to the message that something is dangerous is to stop doing it*. If a lot of people switch from cycling to driving cars, that will increase risk for cyclists (and pedestrians) since cars are more dangerous than bicycles. (In places like the Netherlands, where a lot of short trips within a city are done on a bike, it would also have a horrible effect on traffic congestion.)

[@kenbrown2808]

@@roelsch they just need to make a law that a cyclist who chooses not to wear a helmet is responsible for any head injury incurred in a crash. personally, I've worn a helmet ever since I put road rash from my forehead to my jawline and across my ear.

[@roelsch]

​@@kenbrown2808 That sounds pretty overbearing. We know walking to somewhere is about equally dangerous as cycling somewhere. Should we also have a law that a pedestrian who chooses not to wear a helmet is responsible for any head injury incurred in a crash? There is a very long list of somewhat dangerous things that may get you a head injury, and most are not covered by helmet laws. Think of things like using a ladder, jumping on a trampoline, etc.

[@ToddNZMTB]

The runner _who did nothing wrong_ probably shouldn't be in the thumbnail in my opinion.

[@SaviourInDistress]

The video is cycling fails not jogger fails. Dont really see why you have a problem with it as its not saying the jogger did anything wrong

[@TimpBizkit]

Cyclist is swearing at a jogger on the other side of a wide two way path! He's not even in the bloody way! The swear words should be reserved for dog walkers stretching a lead across the entire path, and groups of 6 pedestrians abreast blocking the whole path!

[@aleopardstail]

does the cyclist have to leave 1.5m gap to the pedestrian? and if not, why not?

[@mikewade777]

The gap depends on the pedestrian.

[@SaviourInDistress]

​@@mikewade777 not if the cyclist barrels towards them forcing them towards the road 😂

[@mikewade777]

@@SaviourInDistress the gap still depends on the pedestrian.

[@SaviourInDistress]

@@mikewade777 how? They should jump into traffic to avoid a bike hurtling towards them and its the pedestrians fault? Is that really your stance?

[@roelsch]

I would say, depends on your speed. AFAIK it is not a rule. At walking pace I think you don’t need a large gap. Bicycles are not as heavy as cars, they don’t have A-pillar blind spots, and they are much more manoeuvrable than cars. You’re always going to have (well you should) more stringent rules for cars than for bicycles. At speed I would give a large gap. The pedestrian in the first clip was absolutely right to call out that cammer.

[@Kenjh71]

Copyright strike? Sounds more like a "boo hoo" strike. Twitter gopro cyclists are a special breed.

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

It wasn't to be fair.

[@andrewnorris5415]

I don't understand, so he got the whole video pulled just b/c he disagreed with your commentary on it? As a very regular cyclist I can say I found that very dangerous. All those people about right by each side of the road. Clearly not enough room for another car to go by and tight for a cycle. Nobody expecting a cycle to be there. At least if a motorbike were crazy enough to overtake there people would have heard them. With that many people, and many of them kids, by each side of the road! The cars may have to move out. The cars will not expect a cyclist to be in that gap. They will be keeping an eye on the crowd to the left to see if anyone steps out. Any collision with the cycle could send the cars veering back into the crowd. This is not rocket science. It's not about how much the cyclist could see. It's what happens with the crowd, which he cannot predict, and what the drivers are aware of. I hope he does accept he made a mistake there. I know we all make the odd stupid one - I still do. But I do try and learn from it.

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

Do you two ask me or get in contact when you use my footage?

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

Neither was this clip.

[@andrewnorris5415]

@@AntonyE-iq5ee Doing something unexpected where people do not expect you to be with distractions and lots of people about is dangerous. I always play it super safe passing lots of people on the pavement. I know how easy it is for someone to step out. Say a kid is watching the cars and does not see or expect the cyclist to be there and runs out a bit to get closer to the cars as they go by... The kid could be hit by the cycle and kid and/or cyclist could be under the wheels in an instant. Then there is what could happen at the other side causing a car to move out to give more room and into the cyclist he did not expect/know was there.

[@chrisnumnuts8671]

the lorrie should have change lanes to overtake you call yourself a cycling instructor how you manage that in a lucky bag 4.58

[@TPH250290]

We're meant to give whole lanes to cyclists now, not just 1.5 metres?

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

There was no need and in this situation it would have been possibly more dangerous.

[@chrisnumnuts8671]

@@AshleyNeal-JustCycling if you cannot overtake safely do not overtake

[@chrisnumnuts8671]

@@TPH250290 he explaining it better than me and there right shit overtake

[@lesliedavison752]

There are cyclists and those who ride cycles, the latter don’t know or follow the rules and cause the most danger AND are usually easy to spot, ,give them a wide berth

[@ErMahGawdIzJimmEH]

And we as a society should be aiming to increase the number of people riding bikes, not the number of cyclists. Riding a bike to get somewhere should be as easy and comfortable as walking and the UK is so far away from that...

[@TPH250290]

So the guy exploited KZbin's silly copyright system because he didn't like what you said about his video? It's a shame KZbin aren't aware that he was the one who sent you the video for you to use, lol.

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

Not at all, and he made some fair points. The copyright was fuelled by a certain group on Twitter who want me silenced.

[@AshleyNeal-JustCycling]

This is CykelTony above. He is the one who complained to the DVSA that I was anti-cyclist. He said I was targeting Cyclists on social media.

[@TPH250290]

@@AshleyNeal-JustCycling That's worse then, because KZbin should ask them to prove that the "copyrighted" video belongs to them.

[@cyclecam6328]

@@AntonyE-iq5ee I think Ashley has learnt loads from cycling himself and his interactions with his audience. It's a credit to him that he can hold his hand up to errors of analysis and that experienced cyclists such as myself can learn from his roadcraft teaching. Ashley and I have had a few debates in the KZbin comments and found good common ground.

[@TPH250290]

@@AntonyE-iq5ee But the clip owners send their clips to Ashley, thereby giving him permission to use the clips in his videos. Seems like he exploited the system. Having done some research you strike me as a wannabe Jeremy Vine-type bellend who can barely get any social media engagement.