Cylindrical Honeycomb in SolidWorks with Ryan

[@with-Aryan]

Watch my 1-Hour free webinar if you are a beginner here▶ pages.solidworkstutorials.net/comments

[@with-Aryan]

Folks, check out my SolidWorks course for Beginners. If you are ready to go all the way in one go, sign up. courses.solidworkstutorials.net/Webinar-Registration?YT&

[@suekuan1540]

So how would put the pattern fit to a shape like a pear shaped hourglass?

[@with-Aryan]

I have a great webinar that is free and you can watch it here bit.ly/SolidWorksCourseProForBeginners

[@zachandrews340]

Hi, love the content so far! I think a good exercise / demo for the future would be how to model a Saxophone mouthpiece. Keep up the good work!

[@with-Aryan]

thanks!

[@muhammadzahradeen5078]

How do i make a cylindrical shaped model after already designing and making the pattern in a rectangular shape

[@with-Aryan]

use FLEX to bend it

[@muhammadzahradeen5078]

@@with-Aryan i did but am still having a little space

[@ahsansaeed4823]

the link you provided for adding equations is not working

[@with-Aryan]

sorry had to change the website

[@wifi4all2]

the content is not ment to explain the whole process, it just provides an overview idea how do it. many shortcuts in the video, and the mathematics for the hexagons are not really sound, it is a kind of trial and error. I found it somehow useful, the author main objective seems to an advert to his trainings

[@with-Aryan]

why? you didn't learn how to do such models from this video?

[@jackjonathan5504]

absolutely lovin your content fam. super useful, straightforward and absolutely efficient. keep up the good work👍👌

[@with-Aryan]

Thanks, will do!

[@avitolourenco]

Why not just make the circumference as a variable in the equations section, no need of external calculations, atleast not very much

[@with-Aryan]

That would be working it backwards. That's also a solution, sure

[@avitolourenco]

@@with-Aryan nice, reverse engineering ig

[@liamthedevastator]

So the strut dimension is arbitrary? That was really unclear.

[@with-Aryan]

Yes, it it