NEW Upgraded F-15EX III Shocked NATO Countries And Russia

NEW Upgraded F-15EX III Shocked NATO Countries And Russia.
Why does the US Air Force have to repurchase the F-15? Have the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II fighters started absorbing money faster than the Federal Reserve System can print it, and the US Air Force decided to save money? Now you will find out everything you need to know.
#new #f-15ex #nato #russia
For copyright matters please contact us at:
[e-mail]

[@raguilard]

This is the most advanced aircraft in the world other than the F-22. 104 kills and 0 losses from the older F-15.

[@johnpaulbacon8320]

I would say F-22 then F-35 then this version of the F-15.

[@devonc1]

So proud to be a part of the program! Go ECoE Mesa!

[@acevtol]

IF Rambo can be recalled - then the F15 can do it.

[@jasonbose3507]

A PLANE BUILT TO PERFECTION! Also, it's a really fast plane that can tractor 🚜 tow anything it's connected to. The F-15 and the A-10 are built tough for a specific purpose, kicking MAJOR BUTT in any conflict, it has the record to prove it too! The F-35 and the F-22 seem like white glove type of objects and can't be scratched. These planes are unproven in serious combat conditions and the F-15 & A-10 have done the task with flying colors. Anyway, thanks for the video 📸.

[@truthvfiction]

Cheap, blistering fast. Still rockin deadly. Soon to be 4.5 stealthy.

[@noppornwongrassamee8941]

It sounds to me like the F-15 might join the hallowed ranks of the A-10 and B-52 as the next plane that's so good that they never get retired. They this get constant upgrades.

[@averageguy7136]

When the mission doesn't require stealth, which most don't, the F-15ex is the best there is in the world.

[@xh3598]

The F-15EX has the strongest center box among any fighters worldwide, enabling it to effortlessly handle any G-force at various loads. In my view, the future F15 should leverage the rear cockpit by integrating advanced command computers to replace the weapon officer and command up to eight UCAVs alongside to the battle zone. Furthermore, with additional wing pods at stations 1 and 9, it possesses the capability to carry an enormous weapon payload to the war zone, akin to having R2D2 in the back seat. There are endless technologies embedded into the F15 that may be better than the F35 or the next 6Gen. The F15 will always be the workhorse that can carry massive weapons and now it has technology companions that don't care about G-force maneuvers. Compare: 1 (6 Gen Fighter) vs 1 (F15EX+8 UCAV).

[@halrichard1969]

Nothing said about Engine improvements. I can imagine the F-15 having more range, payload, and performance.

[@acemax1124]

*The New F-15 🇺🇲 is definitely a flying missle truck ✈️🚀🚛 ✔️*

[@rangerhawk]

Comparing this aircraft to its 1970s ancestor does it some injustice. The only aspect it has in common is the basic airframe. This would be nothing like calling up a Vietnam Vet for service.

[@mikehindson-evans159]

...and the number of course! My grandfather always liked his old shovel; despite the fact that it had received two new heads and three new handles during its lifetime.....

[@MakerBoyOldBoy]

The F-15 original concept was radically changed by the new project manager John Boyd who also created the first study on fighter combat physics saving energy in combat. His teachings are the basis of modern air combat. He altered the F-15 project to meet the new physics which resulted in an airframe with continuous upgrades may never retire. His story is well worth reading.

[@sumerbc7409]

Putin is FURIOUS at NEW Upgraded F-15EX III !

[@davidjarvie9546]

😂😅😊

[@craig4867]

As a Russian fighter pilot, we are not furious about the F-15EX, we have high regard and respect for all F-15 Eagles!

[@davidjarvie9546]

@@craig4867 I respect the Russian aircraft as well, they built things cheaply and cost effective and quick to repair.

[@craig4867]

@@davidjarvie9546 👍🇷🇺

[@sumerbc7409]

@@craig4867 As a CIA NSA intelligence officer I know your reply is fabricated and a lie.

[@johnpaulbacon8320]

I had always thought what if the older gen planes were Re-Manufactured today , using newer materials and more advanced technologies and weapons. How they might be able to be a better companion for the newer gen.

[@marlobreding7402]

The F15 is close to heart. In 1973, I worked at McDonnell Douglas Aerospace Santa Monica CA on radar domes for the F15. Sadly, I never got near one as they were built in St. Louis MO.

[@djoswald9128]

Nice 😊, Rock On 🤘 F-15EX.!.

[@chrislong3938]

6:24 - Ranging from the BLU107 Durandal which destroys enemy runways TO the monstrous 8-foot BLU107 Durandal which destroys enemy airfields! That's quite the range of weapons!!!

[@rayboucher479]

Profits !

[@Rock_Snob]

Just curious how it shocked NATO & Russia? Neither has had combat in sometime!

[@willischang6956]

You forget about “Beast mode” for the F35. It sacrifices stealth for carrying more weapons on external hard points.

[@reneestevez7193]

¡LONG LIVE EAGLE!

[@dickslocum]

THE F-15NC was only an artist misconception. never got off the drawing board.

[@johnpaulbacon8320]

Both the F-35's and F-22's can be mounted with under-wing mounting ; but most of the time there not because the uSAF doesn't want to compromise their stealth aspect. If they did equip an F-35 in this standard manner , just how much would the stealth get compromised?

[@LordOmnissiah]

The underslung missiles basically nullify the stealth completely. You stick those missiles on an F-35 and it’s the same as flying an old Gen 4 non-stealthy plane

[@dougroberts3840]

I don't believe the U.S. Air Force really cares that much about stealth, if they did they would of opted for the YF-23, the YF-23 is stealthier and faster then the F-22, the F-22 is more maneuverable and that's why they went with it

[@fredeb67]

F15 is also made and used in South Korea 15k.

[@jsalazar3]

MIG rhymes with Pig...

[@javadj184]

Please also mention metric unit when it comes to figures. Not all viewers are Americans

[@mindyrolston3915]

Deal with it😂😂😂😂

[@anthonyforstnerjr6626]

Give it the paint boys

[@JohnHorton-qb5jr]

Love the eagles but bring back the tomcats

[@sammcbride2464]

Why didn't they angle the tail like the F-18, F-22, and F-35? That would have added a bit more stealth to the plane.

[@mothmagic1]

Not necessarily

[@davidturcotte5677]

F15 came first.

[@sammcbride2464]

@@davidturcotte5677 The strike eagle and F-15EX did not. Also, it was evaluated in other air planes. The article is about the F-15EX, so my comment is in context of the article update.

[@larjam3866]

They blew their stealth already by having outside mount bombs....spending millions more when it wont help is foolish.

[@sammcbride2464]

@@larjam3866 Millions to slant the tails? You sound like a politician. You are so cute. One downed F-15 would be more than that.

[@first--class]

although it isn't the most powereful i love using the f15 in modern warships because pf how it flies 😎👌

[@DominiOne683]

I really like this new middle truck concept that when in mode allows forward asset aircraft to remotely launch the F-15EX’s selected missiles, making the forward assets free’d up to assault at will without worrying about limit of missile availability in the missile bay.

[@Famous-Potatoes]

The “Boing” F-15”?

[@markymarknj]

Yes, because Boeing and MD merged some years ago.

[@yamiyami5760]

🤘🤘👍

[@rogeriodearaujobonito6377]

Why not a F15 Eagle stealth version with anti radar coat paint and geometric perfil???

[@barryraymond9004]

Externally carried weapons.

[@martincalero7390]

I tell you who is not shocked, the pilots of the Su-30SM Flanker H. They will eat the new Eagle for lunch without even trying.

[@AsiuwayNasdi-qj9yo]

Not the Aircraft but its on the Pilot on how to handle.

[@larjam3866]

It said that the F15 can defend itself but then doesn't say how....anybody? Bombers usually aren't defensive.

[@BasedF-15Pilot]

What the F is this thumbnail lol.

[@greggdudash7467]

Interesting analysis but the narrator is probably a robot voice. It isn’t pronounced M-I-G, it is simply MiG. Robots miss things like that which depreciates otherwise good content.

[@paladin0654]

Since the aircraft's IOC is years late, I don't think this is much of a "shock".

[@americanrambler4972]

If nothing else, the Russian/Ukrainian shown just how fast weapons systems get used up and or destroyed. There is still a big requirement for “quantity” along with precision and capability. And the F-15 production line is still open. The F-22 production line is long gone. And a surprising number of “old, obsolete” platforms have proved their worth in that conflict, especially against some of the newer technology’s being deployed. Who would have thought old tracked machine cannon platforms would have been an affordable and effective weapons system against cheap and plentiful drone platforms, and give strike choppers and other aircraft such a hard time on the battlefield? The 40+ year old weapons platforms are being effectively used alongside the shiny new stuff.

[@kevincheney6628]

Seen the f15exll but where's ex3?

[@KirkDavis1966]

Thats because Russia can only field like 18 gen 5 fighters and NOBODY has shot an EAGLE down since, EVER...And they are cheaper and more plentiful than F 35s and F 22s...

[@lannybrasher2452]

Kinda saying the raptors and f-35s are irrelevant.😢

[@Etron49]

The f15ex is a missle ,or bomb truck for the f22 And the f35. The f15ex may have an electronic "bubble" masking it. It may have lasers and microwave weapons and know they can fight in and out of any situation,as in stealth not needed, come and get me and die.

[@eugenefrankmd5433]

How is it that the. shoulder patch is in Arabic?

[@lordvadar6104]

Why does your illustration show an F-15 with twin ventral horizontal stabilizers?

[@bestamerica]

' american F-15 is a great jetfighter airplane but have 2 errors on designs

[@charlesnowakowski8065]

Why do you use a thumbnail for a nonexistent airplane for a video on the F-15? I cannot stand this. The F-15 is cool enough without adding nonsense pictures of an airplane that couldn't even land. F-15s don't have lower tails. Knock it off!

[@MM-mo2yc]

Russia cant handle a few one engine, single seat F-16’s.

[@kenbolin4956]

The computor doesn't know much about the F15 or its capability, bad video

[@yozeroh7558]

Another channel ripping off content from another channel with an AI voice over

[@freeflymonkey]

dumbest looking plane ever.

[@spikymikie]

The AI voice you use sucks.

[@nebojsanesic5326]

Shocking is the amount of money U maniacs spent on overpriced, unfunctional technology just to go back to 55 years old design.

[@Kharnellius]

Planes aren’t one size fits all. For following an aviation video it’s surprising this has to be pointed out. Also, the EX has very little in common with the original.

[@nebojsanesic5326]

Not even shoes are. What does THAT even mean? And U're ending with "little in common"? Only name, size, material, engines, radar, T and T characteristics...@@Kharnellius

[@opencarry3860]

@@Kharnellius 70 percent of the design remains. A plane ahead of its time.

[@Pre613]

You feel the same about the Su-35?

[@nebojsanesic5326]

Get a life.@@Pre613