BUDGET $200 {Mono Blue} vs. $15,000 {The Deck} | MTG Old School Magic Battle {Video 2 of 3}

[@tristanmacresy7666]

Hello thanks for this beautiful game ! Please what's the full budget mono blue decklist !!

[@pedroantunes6652]

we want more vintage budget decks Daniel! luuuv this series

[@vintagemagic]

thanks man, trying to keep more footage as I can!

[@brianamdisen1989]

Daniel. Can we get the cardlist for the monoblue. Looks like a fun deck.

[@Wolfenmedic65d]

What’s that budget deck list??

[@JeffBoski]

Daniel must have played some Texas Holdem in Vegas if he said "check" instead of "go ahead"

[@nkmason8284]

I like the game play footage, please keep it coming

[@vintagemagic]

thanks man! appreciate you watching!

[@EdwintheMagicEngineer]

Budget is much better than people think!

[@vintagemagic]

it also feels amazing to beat a 15k deck...

[@mtgmeansmagic4758]

+10

[@KSechrist]

at turn 2, should strip the strip. Don't let the deck pick which land to kill and 20 seconds later, you see why. W/island you can kill lotus. or at least keep him from playing it for a turn or 2.

[@KSechrist]

@11:42 with factory incoming, should change his factory w/emerald block, then tap factory to make his 3/3 killing budget's 2/2. Had budget held up TIM, then no, shouldn't trade, but budget spent TIM too early. TIM should be held until EOT of DECK.

[@KSechrist]

@9:04 should have attacked with factory unless you're going to remember the 3/3 kills 2/2 trick that you didn't earlier.

[@KSechrist]

@11:42 should have taken a point of mana burn as it takes 1 to convert factory and he used a sol ring. I guess he could put the trigger on stack and do it again, but no explanation was given

[@mattk8578]

Good game. I like watching these games.

[@DjLevicinci]

Vintage MTG Plays alot of Poker.

[@somewhathandsome5288]

Please do a deck profile on that blue deck

[@sirmegallot3276]

Waiting until end of opponents turn to ping with sorcerer best routine, in case he drops a creature during his turn you'd want to target, although doesn't look like many creatures get played in vintage

[@paulm.1788]

MOAR GAMEPLAY VIDEOS!!!!

[@PonyBoy2792]

93/94 looks so fun. Too bad eternal is dead where I'm at.

[@implode3]

Need a 94 group, get my butt kicked by full powered decks. But it would be fun

[@charleshayesvaughn]

Why are you still playing with mana burn rules? Do you Ante too?

[@nickfanzo]

Yeah mana burn is stupid

[@joel.lallier]

These cards were all designed with mana burn in mind. It was the downside to having powerful mana sources and could be used against your opponent.

[@sneibarg]

Boomerang's nice but it's no Capsize with buyback.

[@mtgmeansmagic4758]

I can see this reasoning. Except that Boomerang is a better tempo spell in the early game, and capsize is a either a win con or a win more.

[@sneibarg]

The comic shop where I started playing MTG back in '94 after Revised was released mostly played multiplayer games, so I've always preferred the long, drawn-out stalemate games. Consequently, I used to play a red/blue Tradewind Rider/Capsize/Palinchron deck with a win condition you could occasionally get with Voltaic Key and Time Vault. It was infinite turns resulting in returning everything on the board owned by opponents to their hand. Lol. That's why Boomerang is no Capsize with buyback.

[@goldismagic]

Mono decks are cheaper and can be quite powerful

[@mtgmeansmagic4758]

Yes!

[@Wolfenmedic65d]

Been 7 months and no answer lol

[@nickfanzo]

Mana burn is lame.

[@joel.lallier]

It's fine with me that mana burn was eventually eliminated but these old cards were all designed with mana burn in mind. It was the downside to having powerful mana sources.

[@nickfanzo]

@@joel.lallier I know that, I’ve been playing since 1994. It was still a dumb rule and bad for tournaments