‪@dawahoverdunya‬

SUPPORT ROB CHRISTIAN FOR FULL-TIME MINISTRY:
📈 Patreon ➥ / robchristian
🅿️ Paypal ➥ paypal.me/TheRobChristian
INFO & TIMESTAMPS:
🕒 Timestamps:
0:00 - Ramzi’s claim about al-Zuhri
2:07 - Farid’s claim about al-Zuhri
2:27 - Rob Christian Exposes the lies of Ramzi & Farid
ℹ️ Here is what famous Scholars also have said about imam al-Zuhri:
1) You must learn from Al-Zuhri, for you will not find anyone more knowledgeable of the ways of the past than him.” - Caliph ‘Umar ibn ‘Abd Al-‘Aziz
2) “There is no one like Al-Zuhri in this world-when he entered Madinah, no one else would narrate Hadith until he left.” - Imam Malik
3) “[Al-Zuhri] was the depository of the learning of the seven jurists of Madinah,” and “had no equal among men.” - Imam Malik
4) “Al-Zuhri is the best scholar of Hadith and the best expert in isnad.” - Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal.
ℹ️ Some Ignorant and Foolish Muslims might attack one of the narrators in the chain (in the book: “Tarikh Al-Tabari”) who is called: “Al-Nu’man bin Rashid”. Here is what famous Sunni scholars said about Al-Nu’man bin Rashid:
1) Ibn Hajar said: “He is Honest”
2) Ibn Shaheen: He mentioned him in the book of: “The Trustworthy”
3) Al-Bukhari said: “He is Honest” and Al-Bukhari used him as “Witness”
4) Ibn Hibban: “His Hadith is in Al-Sahih”.
FOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
▶️ Rob Christian's #2 KZbin Channel: / @robchristian2
🎭 Facebook: / therobchristian
♪ TikTok: / rob.christian3
🥊 Rumble: rumble.com/user/RobChristian
📸 Instagram: / tharealrc
🐦 Twitter: / tharealrc
💬 BitChute: www.bitchute.com/channel/RobC...
💡 Minds: www.minds.com/RobChristian
📙 FAQ:
Q: “RC, can we download and repost your Videos & Live Shows?”
A: Yes, but provide the Link to my KZbin channel in your description box & pinned comment.
#Suicidal #Muhammad #Islam #Sunnah #Hadith #Bukhari #fyp #Ramadan #Quran
‪@shamounian‬ ‪@acts17polemics‬ ‪@apologeticsroadshow‬ ‪@ApostateProphet‬ ‪@ChristianPrince1‬ ‪@AdamSeeker‬ ‪@GodLogicApologetics‬
-------------------------------------------------
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-------------------------------------------------
© Rob Christian - Official KZbin Channel

[@RobChristian]

🕒 Timestamps: 0:00 - Ramzi’s claim about al-Zuhri 2:07 - Farid’s claim about al-Zuhri 2:27 - Rob Christian Exposes the lies of Ramzi & Farid ℹ️ Here is what famous Scholars also have said about imam al-Zuhri: 1) You must learn from Al-Zuhri, for you will not find anyone more knowledgeable of the ways of the past than him.” - Caliph ‘Umar ibn ‘Abd Al-‘Aziz 2) “There is no one like Al-Zuhri in this world-when he entered Madinah, no one else would narrate Hadith until he left.” - Imam Malik 3) “[Al-Zuhri] was the depository of the learning of the seven jurists of Madinah,” and “had no equal among men.” - Imam Malik 4) “Al-Zuhri is the best scholar of Hadith and the best expert in isnad.” - Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal ℹ️ Some Ignorant and Foolish Muslims might attack one of the narrators in the chain called: “Al-Nu’man bin Rashid”. Here is what famous Sunni scholars said about Al-Nu’man bin Rashid: 1) Ibn Hajar said: “He is Honest” 2) Ibn Shaheen: He mentioned him in the book of: “The Trustworthy” 3) Al-Bukhari said: “He is Honest” and Al-Bukhari used him as “Witness” 4) Ibn Hibban: “His Hadith is in Al-Sahih”.

[@KnowledgeWalaTheWarner193]

without lies islamophobs dies!! Ramzi is saying truth because in hadess the wording zohri is saying sucidal wording part of hadees that does not have chain and where does zohri got that news that have no chain so these wording is not authentic but hadees which have chain is authentic ! Part of hadees in which sucidal wording written is not authentic !! Why you christians are so much ignorant !! Islam is the only true religion!! ! !!

[@LuzViMinda-zu2bo]

That's why Islam known for "Without lies Islam Dies".

[@DjawedRabie]

😂مصطلح(عن)لا يعني سلسلة متصلة بل من المصطلحات التي تفيد الارسال الوصل يستعمل فيه المحدث سمعنا او سمعت اما عن الحديث فهذا يثبت ان بين الزهري و عروة شخص مجهول سمع هذه القصة لهذا الزهري يقول في موضع اخر فيما بلغنا توقف انت عن احراج نفسك و نشر الاكاذيب حول الاسلام العظيم

[@kembekanana]

Internet and modern techology is really destroying Islam from within. Praise to YOU, LORD JESUS CHRIST...

[@nunya54]

Jesus was God but didn't know it? James D.G. Dunn, Emeritus Professor of Divinity in the Department of Theology at University of Durham, Minister of the Church of Scotland and Methodist preacher says "But if we are to submit our speculations to the text and build our theology only with the bricks provided by careful exegesis we cannot say with any confidence that Jesus knew himself to be divine, the pre-existent Son of God." (Christology in the Making: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation)

[@Hen2471]

@@nunya54 Jesus said god and I are one Allah think he is a god but actually he’s NOT 😂😂😂 Allah try 3 times “Igra …. Igra ….igra” mohamad till he die don’t know how to read and write 😂😂😂😂😂 Jesus …….. even dead people rose from the dead 😂😂😂

[@nunya54]

He also said "And the glory which Thou hast given me, I have given to them (disciples); that they may be one, just as we are one." (John 17:22).@@Hen2471

[@samuelflores1419]

​@@nunya54Give it up! You still have time to turn to the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob! Why the Lies? When you Must Lie or make Excuses for your beliefs, RED FLAG!!!

[@nunya54]

What lie?@@samuelflores1419

[@RoarT19]

This Rumzi and Farida are Rotten potatoes

[@mo_51_married_aisha_6]

Without lies, Islam dies.

[@sentientglitch]

Without insanity, there is no crosstianity

[@samuelmithran5586]

@@sentientglitchcorrect there is no insanity and also There is no such thing as crosstianity..

[@sentientglitch]

@@samuelmithran5586 there absolutely is. Lets debate

[@sentientglitch]

@@samuelmithran5586 And without lies, Islam thrives

[@samuelmithran5586]

@@sentientglitch ... ?? So Bold ain't you?

[@user-c7d0433]

Rumzi believes that he knows Islam better than Imam Bukhari

[@Arabian_Epileptic]

This is also recorded in Ibn Ishaq and Tabari. Abdul are embarrassed

[@DjawedRabie]

😂😂😂 مصطلح(عن)لا يعني سلسلة متصلة بل من المصطلحات التي تفيد الارسال الوصل يستعمل فيه المحدث سمعنا او سمعت اما عن الحديث فهذا يثبت ان بين الزهري و عروة شخص مجهول سمع هذه القصة لهذا الزهري يقول في موضع اخر فيما بلغنا هذه المعلومات بعرفها طالب سنة اولى في علم الحديث توقف انت عن احراج نفسك و نشر الاكاذيب حول الاسلام العظيم

[@DarkAngel-cj6sx]

They just defend Islam , they are not truth seekers

[@nunya54]

So they are truth defenders. Islam = truth

[@sunrays472]

😂​@@nunya54

[@samuelmithran5586]

@@nunya54 Greetings to the citizens of opposite world..

[@collybever]

@@nunya54So the sun sets in a muddy pool and Jesus' mother was Aaron's sister?

[@nicco-sixty]

@@nunya54 How come ibn Abbas said the eearth is on the back of a whale?

[@martinweber202]

without lies islam dies

[@cutest6562]

prove it ? 🥱

[@Momo_is_a_p3do]

@@cutest6562your prophet is a 😈

[@theholygospels3409]

​@@cutest6562 already proved in this video 😂 so now go and manipulate someone else through your Taqiyyah

[@mohsinlone2295]

About 70000 ur brothers and sisters convert to Islam every year sorry revert 😂 ... so get ready pack ur bags 😂😂😂

[@RumziFanboy]

Thank you Brother Rob ♥️ ✝️🙌🤓

[@morghe321]

Is that a childhood picture of Rumzi you have there? 😄

[@sentientglitch]

so easy to refute you lmao

[@RumziFanboy]

@@sentientglitch 😞

[@Darva-sl3jh]

I'm beginning to see more Ex-Muslims than Muslims. There is hope for humanity.

[@rahalkhan2618]

That's funny. I see the opposite. More and more Christians are coming to my mosque in mckinney tx. Saying the shahada. Go figure

[@yasiem6245]

​@@rahalkhan2618 cope. Anecdotes are not a reliable form of evidence. Also, the only reason why Islam is growing is because of fast birth rates lol.

[@Darva-sl3jh]

@@rahalkhan2618 You're lying. But if that makes you feel better go ahead.

[@Darva-sl3jh]

@@yasiem6245 Those fast births won't matter in the decades to come because at least 30% of those children will be openly apostates with another 20% secretly apostates.

[@LeRoyBoxley434]

​@rahalkhan2618 People CLAIMING to be Christian because they don't know another faith to claim other than what they've been around doesn't actually make them Christian.

[@The_Buster01]

Thank you @RobChristian for exposing these dawah liars.. May Jesus guide you further in exposing the Satan and his followers.. Amen..

[@nunya54]

If Muslims follow Satan, that makes Jesus as liar.

[@sj1684]

🤔If their so called "prophet" was not suicidal, why is the story in their books??? muslims wish they could erase\scrub most if not all of the alsunna alnabawia but it's all over the internet.😅

[@nunya54]

It's like how Jesus dying is in the Bible but it's not authentic. It's what someone wrote. It still has to be verified as true.

[@sunrays472]

It is quite encouraging to note that 26% of the first generation Muslims in the US and other western countries don't believe in Islam. 8% of the Muslims in the Middle East don't have faith in their own religion, and the numbers are growing. 65% of the mosques in Iran are already closed.There are strong, vibrant ex-muslim communities springing up around the world - the awareness is spreading like wild fire. It is a matter of time before Islam implodes under its own weight​ of lies.

[@alisterrebelo9013]

​@@nunya54 We believe the Bible is completely true in the same way you say the Koran is completely true. The difference is that the Koran makes false statements about the world, and therefore it cannot be true because God almighty cannot be wrong about any fact of this world. Is man created from a liquid coming from between backbone and breastbone? 86:5 فَلْيَنظُرِ ٱلْإِنسَـٰنُ مِمَّ خُلِقَ ٥ 86:6 خُلِقَ مِن مَّآءٍۢ دَافِقٍۢ ٦ 86:7 يَخْرُجُ مِنۢ بَيْنِ ٱلصُّلْبِ وَٱلتَّرَآئِبِ ٧ Man should reflect on what he was created from. He is created from spurting fluid, then he emerges from between the backbone and breastbone

[@nunya54]

@@alisterrebelo9013 Modern medicine has discovered that this place -- between the backbone and the ribs -- is the place where the cells that will form the testes first grow, and at a later stage of embryonic development they descend to the scrotum below the abdome The scientific fact is that the primordial cells of the testes in the male or the ovaries in the female accumulate in the backs of the parents during the embryonic stage, then they come out of the back from the area between the start of the spinal column and the start of the ribs, then the ovaries migrate towards the pelvis in the vicinity of the uterus, and the testes migrate to the scrotum where the temperature is lower, otherwise they will fail to produce sperm and become subject to the risk of developing into cancerous tumours if the journey is not completed. “He is created from a water gushing forth, Proceeding from between the back-bone (as-sulb) and the ribs (at-taraa’ib)”[at-Taariq 86:5-7]. These are scientific facts that science has only recently discovered, although they were proven thirteen hundred years ago. The fact is that the sulb of the man is his spinal column and his taraa’ib are the bones of his chest … If we turn to embryology we will find in the development of the man’s testes and the woman’s ovaries that which will explain these verses that have been unclear to many people… Both the testes and the ovaries, in the initial stages of their development, are near the kidneys, in a location between the backbone and the ribs, that is, between the midpoint of the spine and opposite the lowest ribs. Then when the testes and ovaries have migrated to their final locations in the body, they are supplied with arterial blood and controlled by nerves that are connected to a place in the body that is located between the backbone and the ribs. Thus the truth of what the Holy Qur’aan said has become clear, but science has only discovered it recently, thirteen hundred years after this Book was revealed. After developing, the testes and ovaries both descend to their places in the body. The testes descend to their place in the scrotum and the ovaries descend to their place in the pelvis, near the fallopian tubes. In some cases this descent is not complete and the testes stop partway, failing to go all the way to the scrotum; in this case surgery is required. End quote. The phrase “Proceeding from between the back-bone (as-sulb) and the ribs (at-taraa’ib)” is sufficient to describe the history of how offspring develop; it includes all the events that point to the existence of a prior blueprint and perfect design in creation, from their initial formation in the backs of their parents and their migration behind the intestines, starting from the area between the backbone and the ribs, until they reach their final destinations and until the parents are born, reach puberty and get married, and the offspring are created from something like a drop of water in which no human characteristics or features appear, namely the sperm which is alive and moves by itself until it is mixed with its counterpart, then the nutfah is formed, which is “drops of mixed semen (discharge of man and woman)” (cf. al-Insaan 76:2). Wikipedia: ‎ “Descent of the Testes At an early period of fetal life the testes are placed at the back part of the ‎abdominal cavity. ‎The descent of the testes consists of the opening of a connection from the testis ‎to its final location at the anterior abdominal wall, followed by the development of ‎the gubernaculum, which subsequently pulls and translocates the testis down ‎into the developing scrotum. ‎ Descent of the Ovaries Just as in the male, there is a gubernaculum in the female, which effects a ‎considerable change in the position of the ovary, though not so extensive a ‎change as in that of the testis.” In this case the origin of these gonads is from that area in the back of the abdominal cavity between the ribs and the vertebral column (backbone). 86,6-7. He is created from a water gushing forth Proceeding from between the back-bone and the ribs,stemming from between the backbone and the ribcage. Testes and ovaries are formed in the abdomen of the fetus during the first weeks of pregnancy, before descending to their permanent place in the pelvis. Both are sustained by arteries originating between the backbone and the ribcage. (He is created from a water gushing forth.) meaning, the sexual fluid that comes out bursting forth from the man and the woman. Thus, the child is produced from both of them (Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs.) meaning, the backbone (or loins) of the man and the ribs of the woman, which is referring to her chest. Shabib bin Bishr reported from `Ikrimah who narrated from Ibn `Abbas that he said, ﴿يَخْرُجُ مِن بَيْنِ الصُّلْبِ وَالتَّرَآئِبِ ﴾ (Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs.) "The backbone of the man and the ribs of the woman. It (the fluid) is yellow and fine in texture.

[@nunya54]

​@@alisterrebelo9013 Does that apply the Old Testament and New Testament? All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness. So when Jesus became an adult at 12 and allowed marriage at 12, and never corrected that, you believe it's okay to marry 12 year olds? Which resurrection story do you believe? How can they ALL be true?

[@ConsideringPhlebas]

They'll throw their own best sources under the bus time and again and then scream about the 'corruption of the Bible' and all without a hint of self-awareness.

[@DjawedRabie]

😂مصطلح(عن)لا يعني سلسلة متصلة بل من المصطلحات التي تفيد الارسال الوصل يستعمل فيه المحدث سمعنا او سمعت اما عن الحديث فهذا يثبت ان بين الزهري و عروة شخص مجهول سمع هذه القصة لهذا الزهري يقول في موضع اخر فيما بلغنا توقف انت عن احراج نفسك و نشر الاكاذيب حول الاسلام العظيم

[@ConsideringPhlebas]

@@DjawedRabie Dude, your own apologist literally admitted this (Sahih Bukhari) hadith contains false information. And they admit this all the time!

[@DjawedRabie]

@@ConsideringPhlebas هههههه من قال انه يحتوي على معلومات خاطئة؟و هل احتواءه على نقولات كذبة يعني ان الشخص نفسه كذاب او غير موثوق فيه ههه كتاب البخاري كتاب احاديث و ليس كلام الله المباشر مثل القران على الاقل ليس كل الاحاديث كذلك الا التي تصرح بذلك، بمعنى اخر ان الحديث الذي يتحدث عن انتحار النبي هو حديث صحيح عن نقل الزهري و لا تعتبر الحادثة صحيحة لا يعني ان البخاري مشكوك في صحته،مثلما اقول لك ان شخصا قال لي كذا و كذا هذا لا يعني اني كاذب بل الشخص الذي نقلت منه القصة مشكوك في امره و هذا ليس مطعنا في شخصي صديقي انت مثير للشفقة

[@DjawedRabie]

@@ConsideringPhlebas ببساطة شديدة صديقك المسيحي المتحمس الجاهل يدعي ان الحديث صحيح و هو ليس كذلك بل ما يعرف ببلاغات البخاري و انتم صدقتموه كالنعاج فقط لانه احضر كتاب الطبري امامكم هههه و هو لا يفرق بين(عن) و (سمعت) ههه

[@guillermodeleon3547]

RC keep always hitting them with those barz! Always in Christ Name! God bless you and your family ✝️

[@IlarionOrthodox]

brothers and sisters, please share these videos of our brother Rob Christian, so that the Church will be equipped with the information needed in order to minister to the followers of Muhammad. Rob, excellent work my dear brother. continue to expose and address the lies, slander and rhetoric of Rumzi. and not only Rumzi, but all of the islamic apologists. Christ is with you, and Christ will prevail!

[@DjawedRabie]

😂😂😂مصطلح(عن)لا يعني سلسلة متصلة بل من المصطلحات التي تفيد الارسال الوصل يستعمل فيه المحدث سمعنا او سمعت اما عن الحديث فهذا يثبت ان بين الزهري و عروة شخص مجهول سمع هذه القصة لهذا الزهري يقول في موضع اخر فيما بلغنا توقف انت عن احراج نفسك و نشر الاكاذيب حول الاسلام العظيم

[@josecarlosramolete6109]

Question to DawahoverDunya: According to the hadith, Muhammad had intentions of throwing himself from the mountain several times because he didn't receive revelations... And according to Ibn Ishaq's book (Biography), Muhammad wanted to throw himself from the mountain several times because he mourned about the death of Waraqa... So the question is: what is the relationship between Waraqa's death and the halted "revelations" given to Muhammad? Does this mean, Waraqa is the TRUE author of the Quran??

[@nunya54]

??? Revelation happened over 23 years, past Waraqa's time.

[@josecarlosramolete6109]

@@nunya54 That's not the answer and you are NOT reading my question. My question is: what is the relationship between Waraqa's death and the halting of revelations coming to Muhammad? Does that make Waraqa the TRUE author of the Quran? I challenge you to answer these questions, right now!

[@josecarlosramolete6109]

@@nunya54 So that means, Waraqa is the REAL AUTHOR of the Quran. Not Allah himself. That makes the Quran a MAN-MADE book. So why should we believe you anyway? You Muslims are a bunch of liars!

[@nunya54]

The answer is no, Waraqa is not the TRUE author of the Quran@@josecarlosramolete6109 The revelations to Muhammad did not halt with Waraqah's death

[@josecarlosramolete6109]

@@nunya54 Then how come Muhammad had the same intention: throwing himself down from the mountain because Waraqa died and revelations stopped coming? There is a connection after all: Muhammad wanted to kill himself from the mountain while he was mourning for Waraqa. So that means, Waraqa was the SOURCE of the "revelations". Therefore, YOU LIED. Therefore, Quran is MAN-MADE. Waraqa is THE true author of the Quran! You sir, are a CERTIFIED LIAR!

[@letsberational305]

Its funny how they always try to find reasons to disregard hadiths. Muslim scholars took the time to write all these hadiths, and if its not perfectly authentic in their eyes, they treat it like its garbage.

[@alisterrebelo9013]

How do they know what is false? Who's standard are they using to say it is wrong/false or embarrassing? It is because they are using the Christian standard, that they realise it is embarrassing.

[@nunya54]

That's how it should work, lol. If someone makes something up, or is lying, you shouldn't treat it with respect! lol

[@nunya54]

Christian standard? No, in the Islamic standard you have to actually know who was narrating and they had to be righteous, have a good memory, be known for being truthful, etc. Not like the Christian standard at all@@alisterrebelo9013

[@samsam-nx8gq]

☪️ happy pagan Ramadan

[@cutest6562]

you just only saying ,but in reality ...you are weak ...🥱next

[@Momo_is_a_p3do]

@@cutest6562your man made book doesn’t mean shit😂religion is goofy

[@Skyone7thcentury]

allahubarbar, stupid allah.

[@nunya54]

Ramadan is not pagan nor is it a holiday

[@cutest6562]

@@Momo_is_a_p3do it's yours 😏

[@Savi3_1]

I agree with uncle Rumsi and Siter Farida. Quran and Hadiths are just full of lies.

[@pg.coffee]

lol

[@KALEB.SarsRambo_]

And full of disgusting things, stupid things that make me feel sorry to muslims. . Ahh stupid al lah have.. angle..strong thousand wings angle🧛‍♂️ be lose forever vs garlic.. 🤦‍♂️

[@RobChristian]

ℹ️ Here is what famous Scholars also have said about imam al-Zuhri: 1) You must learn from Al-Zuhri, for you will not find anyone more knowledgeable of the ways of the past than him.” - Caliph ‘Umar ibn ‘Abd Al-‘Aziz 2) “There is no one like Al-Zuhri in this world-when he entered Madinah, no one else would narrate Hadith until he left.” - Imam Malik 3) “[Al-Zuhri] was the depository of the learning of the seven jurists of Madinah,” and “had no equal among men.” - Imam Malik 4) “Al-Zuhri is the best scholar of Hadith and the best expert in isnad.” - Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal

[@marcelalhind]

Absolutely devastating for Islam

[@sun2620]

I love it when you put Rumzi in his place

[@DjawedRabie]

😂مصطلح(عن)لا يعني سلسلة متصلة بل من المصطلحات التي تفيد الارسال الوصل يستعمل فيه المحدث سمعنا او سمعت اما عن الحديث فهذا يثبت ان بين الزهري و عروة شخص مجهول سمع هذه القصة لهذا الزهري يقول في موضع اخر فيما بلغنا توقف انت عن احراج نفسك و نشر الاكاذيب حول الاسلام العظيم

[@sun2620]

@@DjawedRabie If Bukhari kept it in all his Hadiths then it's authentic. You picking what you please even out of Bukhari's hadiths is what's laughable. The other laughable thing is that he threw out thousands of hadiths and compiled these as Sahih, and you still reject some. Stop lying to yourself, Jesus is the ONLY WAY, THE ONLY TRUTH and THE ONLY LIFE.

[@DjawedRabie]

@@sun2620 ههههه من الجاهل الذي قال لك ان كل احاديث البخاري صحيحة هناك معلقات البخاري التي لا تعتبر من صحيحه بل وضعها كعنوان للباب الذي يذكر فيه تلك الاحاديث التي لها علاقة بالحديث الضعيف ثانيا البخاري نفسه لم يقل ان كتابه جمع كل الاحاديث الصحيحة بل هو نفسه قال قد جمعت بعضها فقط ههه مثيرون للشفقة

[@DjawedRabie]

@@sun2620 البخاري لم يرمي الاف الاحاديث ههههه بل الاحاديث قد تروى من عدة طرق مثلا يروي اثنان و عشرون شخص نفس الحديث لن يقوم البخاري بذكرهم جميعا بل سيذكر اصدق شخص فيهم و اقواهم ذاكرة ثانيا كما قلت لك البخاري لم يرمي الاحاديث الاخرى او اعتبرها ضعيفة بل ببساطة رأى ان تلك الاحاديث التي جمعها كافية لوضعها في صحيحه هو لم يكن ينوي يوما ان يجمع كل الاحاديث الصحيحة في كتاب بل بعضها فقط

[@DjawedRabie]

@@sun2620 كمية جهل الاجانب بالاسلام غير طبيعية!و تصدقون كل ما يقوله لكم الاعلام و اليوتيوب و بعض الجهلة في التيكتوك فعلا اشفق عليكم لانكم لا تعرفون مقدار عظمة الاسلام

[@childofgod4862]

This is new one for me! They used to say> This Hadith is Daeif even though it is written in Sahih book Then there is NO chain of narrators Or broken chain of narrators etc Now the info given is not valid! What a crock!

[@buulebrian3239]

He tried to throw himself off mountains, well it wasn't a suicide attempt, he was superman or goku in training.

[@Abuallah709]

Without lies islam dies

[@DjawedRabie]

😂مصطلح(عن)لا يعني سلسلة متصلة بل من المصطلحات التي تفيد الارسال الوصل يستعمل فيه المحدث سمعنا او سمعت اما عن الحديث فهذا يثبت ان بين الزهري و عروة شخص مجهول سمع هذه القصة لهذا الزهري يقول في موضع اخر فيما بلغنا توقف انت عن احراج نفسك و نشر الاكاذيب حول الاسلام العظيم تخيل ان الرد على تفاهات صديقك المسيحي لم يؤخذ مني دقيقتين هههه مثيرون للشفقة و الغثيان في نفس الوقت

[@Sandra.1-9-7-6]

What a Great Comedy Show … Jesus forgive them , Guide them and take your sheeps back 🙏

[@nunya54]

How can Jesus forgive them? James D.G. Dunn, Emeritus Professor of Divinity in the Department of Theology at University of Durham, Minister of the Church of Scotland and Methodist preacher says "But if we are to submit our speculations to the text and build our theology only with the bricks provided by careful exegesis we cannot say with any confidence that Jesus knew himself to be divine, the pre-existent Son of God." (Christology in the Making: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation)

[@Kloopen]

​@@nunya54 how can kissing the black stone forgive sins?

[@Error76808]

Because is from heaven ​@@Kloopen

[@BillyMandalay]

​@@Error76808 It is space debris, genius.

[@BillyMandalay]

​@@nunya54 "I Am the Resurrection and the Life. No man comes to the Father but thru Me" Deal with THAT yourself, instead of looking for opinions of fallen men that suit your narrative, coward. Shame on you !

[@dragondaeneris7300]

#EVERYONE 📕📕Reference📕📕 Thank You All For Your Time And Support 🙏🏻 📕Hadith From This Live Sahih Al Bukhari 6982 🔗 sunnah.com/bukhari:6982 Follow Brother Rob On TikTok 🔗 www.tiktok.com/@rob.christian3 To Support Our Brother Ministry Use Those Links Please🙏🏻 1) streamlabs.com/robchristian/tip 2) www.patreon.com/RobChristian THANK YOU ALL GOD BLESS YOU 🙏🏻

[@D.W.C935]

Is this the same Muslim who says Islam is so good bro? or am i mistaken that looks like him on the Thumbnail?

[@nicco-sixty]

They all same the same bs

[@morghe321]

Hey brother. Don't they all say islam is good? 😆

[@D.W.C935]

@morghe321 that's what they say well they wrong 😂

[@morghe321]

@@D.W.C935 yeah, they do. 😅

[@sabesabes12345]

pls keep debunking this guy habibi. Appreciate you work!

[@eagle36791]

Muhammad was so insecure that jibreel had to constantly remind him that he (muhammad) is allah's (lalah's) messanger.

[@morghe321]

This Rumzi guy thinks his sarcasm makes him more convincing.

[@soun6589]

Thank you for exposing this clown, he's the most annoying condecending one of them all.

[@tymon1928]

The miracle of reinterpretation and cherry picking in Islam is craaaazy

[@user-id5xf3qm3k]

😂😅

[@jacstvofficial4490]

Just when you think you heard it all, you’d hear more! 🤦🏽‍♀️

[@mohofpetra4956]

100 different stories from 100 different Muslims.

[@nunya54]

Like the gospels?

[@danemark1880]

Without islam ,lie dies. 👍👍👍

[@user-oh2iq6ot7e]

God bless you Brother Rob..

[@kiwisaram9373]

It is not authentic because it is embarrassing 😅.

[@nunya54]

Why would it be an issue for Christians though? They already believe in prophets who wanted to die as well.

[@mrhumbleintellect_ja313]

​@@nunya54 its not an issue for us, it is for u Muslims. Your own people lie about ur own sources to try and hid the facts. Cant believe u people question Christianity when ur own apologists lie about ur books and sources.😂🤦‍♂️

[@nunya54]

Anyone should question a God that commits suicide @@mrhumbleintellect_ja313

[@Beluna798]

thank you so much brother and keep exposing these evils.

[@iiddrrii6051]

Dang, that's a good point Mr. Rob. Allah bless you :)

[@kakakarkem425]

Even with lies islam going to die.

[@DjawedRabie]

😂مصطلح(عن)لا يعني سلسلة متصلة بل من المصطلحات التي تفيد الارسال الوصل يستعمل فيه المحدث سمعنا او سمعت اما عن الحديث فهذا يثبت ان بين الزهري و عروة شخص مجهول سمع هذه القصة لهذا الزهري يقول في موضع اخر فيما بلغنا توقف انت عن احراج نفسك و نشر الاكاذيب حول الاسلام العظيم و الاسلام اسرع ديانة انتشار في العالم مت بغيظك

[@UnknownMan-cj6uk]

Well done👍👍👍

[@cocojasmine]

It's very desperate attempt of deception. Now they are doing mental gymnastics on Sahih reports 😂

[@roybutiong4468]

Rumzi...😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 LIKE A 6 YEARS OLD

[@Arabian_Epileptic]

To a Muslim you are saying is that he is very mature

[@Seo-Sara97]

Lies are halal for them.

[@Error76808]

Prove it

[@Seo-Sara97]

@@Error76808 1 simple example is you all keep saying, Islam is religion of peace but we all know that is a lie(At Tawbah 9:29 ). You all are not even allowed to greet us and encourage to force us to the most narrowest path of the road (Sahih Muslim 2167a). Where is the ‘peace’ and kindness towards others there? It just look like lies to us. But of course, even with so many proof.. you all just deny.

[@Error76808]

@@Seo-Sara97 9:29 Is revealed when Rome tried to invade and attack Muslims And sahih Muslim 2167a They are non Muslims Non Muslims are violent people at the time of the prophet Muhammad and they tried to kîll Muslims many times so this why Muhammad teach us self defense Plus Muhammad told us in sunan abi dawud 3174 We must stand at funeral of non-muslim You pass away at the time of prophet Muhammad he would stand for you No matter what have you done to him. Now stop using dead arguments We already answered them millions times.

[@taheelshahid5615]

Great work Rob, we love u determination of refuting lies. God bless U

[@gail2698]

Without lies they have nothing to defend

[@minexz7326]

Great Job , god bless u🙏🏼 Link for the Book?

[@wollicreek-gb3oc]

Buhari lived 2 centuries after Muhammad. How could he tell about Muhammad's life? Without lies Islam dies.

[@nunya54]

He didn't tell. People who witnessed it told those under them and they told those under them, passing the information down

[@wollicreek-gb3oc]

@@nunya54 You mean that people who witnessed the life of Muhammad were still alive for 2 centuries until the time of Buhari? 😀

[@wollicreek-gb3oc]

@@nunya54 In Christianity, Matthew and John wrote Injil (the hadith of Jesus) because they lived with Him. Meanwhile, Mark and Luke learned from apostles who spent their times with Him.

[@wollicreek-gb3oc]

@@nunya54 Moreover, Buhari collected too many various stories about Muhammad then selected what he wanted. Therefore, the validity is questioned.

[@nunya54]

No, they passed that information down. @@wollicreek-gb3oc

[@mrhumbleintellect_ja313]

Rumzi and his girl friend.😢 Gotta feeling they both gonna desire each other jannah.😂

[@MaximilianYpplm]

They will ask for source selectively. Laughable.

[@katarmorrocian2421]

I don't trust people with Palestinian flag on their dress.

[@alexanderthegreatoz5945]

_The Sisterhood is very confused_ 😂

[@oneisha3548]

DawahoverDunya is the same guy who is scared to debate Godlogic and Sam Shamoun but will keep using clips of them to “ refute” them. Keep exposing these smug liars RC 💯✨

[@wagsbass]

Come on sister Farida and sister Rumzi, get another job

[@Tai91827]

Isn't this the way ahaadith were transmitted (orally and 'heard'). If we follow Rumzi logic here, all ahaadith can be dismissed as chinese whispers. Mental gymnastics failed here.

[@regi40933]

How Sahih Bukhari not autentic , blame Bukhari who wrote it not Zuhri

[@doudou4657]

“Muhammad wasn’t suicidal” “Source says otherwise” “That doesn’t give source”

[@islamisfalse5024]

Both their careers ENDED by ROB CHRISTIAN 😎✝️☦️

[@SrHdezTrades]

They’ll say “since we have a narration that actually makes the religion even stronger so you made my belief stronger” 😂

[@samuelflores1419]

When you Must Lie or make Excuses for your allah or his profit, Giant Red Flag! So again Without Lies and Excuses islaaam Always Loses!

[@sunigo55]

Thanks Rob Christian for this wonderful information. The Al-Tabari Hadiths would have been good in English for non-arabic speakers.

[@CochinKerala]

I challenge our sisters Zizi (Ramzina) and Fifi (Fareeda) to go ahead and delete all the hadiths which they think are unreliable. Please publish a new set of hadiths with all the unreliable and weak hadiths omitted......if you dare. 😄👍🏼

[@valoreclipse-samael4706]

Guys..gv this guy a subscribe and likes..this guy is so underrated..

[@ozichukwu7]

FACTS OVER SENTIMENTS!!!

[@finessetraphard8682]

Best apologist you always give sources and stuff but I have a question, where do you find these sources always? Thank you for your work. God bless

[@EeustaceE]

From Farida cannot be trusted.

[@joeshaer777]

Hi Brother Rob - Can you provide the link to the hadith you referenced?

[@thenun1846]

What's hilarious is Muslims response nowadays is throwing their own sources under the bus😂

[@Error76808]

​@@paxChristi123 trinity is paganism God is holy spirit God the son God the father 3 gods Pagan satanic religion.

[@gail2698]

Note If you want to see how peaceful Islamists are, just tell the TRUTH about Muhammad...

[@willsonchin5821]

Obviously they're telling us even it is authentic..but in the modern era now we're authentic then those scholars..Just to eludes the humiliation

[@thecongenital3035]

Pray for him

[@Suyanto231]

Shame on dunya over dawah and sister farida

[@maxmaximum-sh4bx]

For the algorithm

[@DarthMarr2009]

Its just cap. He is misinforming, we have heard still implies info especially if he is close. Bukhari wouldve thrown it out

[@christalmettbrotchen1298]

this ramzi guy is such a joke hahahahahah and his followers believe him bc they simply dont know their own religion

[@chrisazure1624]

Running from their sources.

[@Uchihabeater]

Says the religion why Christianity has no source of information where in the Bible the word or concept of trinity is in the Bible that they are coequal and coeternal

[@chrisazure1624]

@@Uchihabeater You haven't read closely. It is in there, just not in the words you demand. Tawhid isn't in the Quran.

[@Uchihabeater]

@@chrisazure1624 tawhid means "the oneness of God" and if want to know where allah himself explains what is tawhid,it is explained in surah ikhlas chapter 112 verse 1-4 Can you explain my question as I have explained your question?

[@chrisazure1624]

@@Uchihabeater The word is not in the Quran. Be consistent if you want to be taken seriously.

[@Uchihabeater]

@@chrisazure1624 I agree the word tawhid isn't there but the concept is there. If you ask any muslim who is god or what is tawhid then they will all explain the same thing what is mentioned in the quran

[@samarkumar4955]

😂 awesome

[@Muhhamedpislam]

Im not muslim and i know that multiple times he tried to do and had.to be talked out of it by his friend if my memory serves me right

[@oursberbere]

❤

[@jib7026]

Whenever I see Rumzi, he looks like he's having a spasm.

[@donhinojosa9044]

Between hadiths weak hadiths interpretations translations imams scholars sheikhs dawah you will be deceived.

[@MuslimSaiyan]

There's another narration present in Bukhari's collection as narration number 6581 in the chapter of "Interpretation of Dreams" under the section heading "Commencement of the Divine Revelation to Allah's Messenger (saws) was in the form of good dreams" The exact wording is: "Az-Zuhri said: 'Urwah informed me on the authority of A'isha (may God be pleased with her) that she said:. the Divine Inspiration was also paused for a while and the Prophet (peace be upon him) became so sad as we have heard that he intended several times to throw himself from the tops of high mountains and every time he went up the top of a mountain in order to throw himself down, Gabriel would appear before him and say, "O Muhammad! You are indeed Allah's Messenger () in truth" whereupon his heart would become quiet and he would calm down and would return home. And whenever the period of the coming of the inspiration used to become long, he would do as before, but when he used to reach the top of a mountain, Gabriel would appear before him and say to him".

[@MuslimSaiyan]

This addition is not from the speech of A'isha, rather it is the statement of Az-Zuhri. He was from the second generation of Muslims and did not witness any of these incidents, nor did he remark that any of the companions of the Prophet informed him of this. He clarifies this in the very narration itself with his statement: "in what has reached us." Ibn Hajar (may God have mercy on him) said: "Thus, the one who made the statement 'in what has reached us' was Az-Zuhri, and the meaning of his statement is: in this sentence is that which has reached us regarding the Prophet (peace be upon him) in regards to this story. It is merely an addition from what has reached Az-Zuhri and is not actually connected back to the original narration, as Al-Kirmani said: this is what is apparent."(Fath al-Bari, volume 12, page 359) Abu Shama al-Maqdisi (may God have mercy on him) said: "This is the statement of Az-Zuhri or someone else other than A'isha - God knows best - due to the phrase: 'in what has reached us,' and Aisha did not say anything from what was mentioned in the hadith." (Sharh al-Hadith al-Muqtafa fi Mab'ath an-Nabi al-Mustafa, page 177).

[@MuslimSaiyan]

Additions of Az-Zuhri from that which reached him are not accepted because their chain of narration is disconnected to begin with, thus they are considered to be "hanging" narrations in both the terminological and practical sense. The mere presence of hanging narrations like this in the collection of Bukhari doesn't mean that Bukhari considered them to be authentic, or that it would be accurate to say that Bukhari narrated them, because that which Bukhari is said to have narrated authentically is only in regards to that which he narrated with a complete chain from beginning to end. Sheikh Albani (may God have mercy on him) said: "To ascribe this narration as being one of Bukhari's is a manifest error, because one who ascribes such a thing imagines that this story of jumping off the mountain is authentic according to the conditions of Bukhari himself. This is not the case, and the proof is that Bukhari narrated this event himself at the end of A'isha's statement in the chapter of "How the Revelation Began".[Albani goes on to quote the full narration]. "This narration along with Az-Zuhri's addition has been recorded by Ahmad (volume 6, pages 232-233), Abu Nu'aym (ad-Dala`il, pages 68-69), and Al-Baihaqi in his ad-Dala`il, volume 1, pages 393-395), via Abdur Razzaq on the authority of Ma'mar. It has also been narrated via this route by Muslim (volume 1, page 98), but he did not narrate the expression; rather, he only referred to the expression narrated by Yunus on the authority of Ibn Shihab without Az-Zuhri's addition. Muslim and Ahmad (volume 6, page 223) both narrated it this way via Aqil bin Khalid on the authority of Ibn Shihab without Az-Zuhri's addition. Bukhari also narrated it this way in the beginning of his collection via Aqil. "Thus I [Albani] say: we may conclude, from the above, that the addition to the narration contains two defects: The first: only Ma'mar narrated it this way, while Yunus and Aqil did not; thus it is rendered an oddity (shaadha). The second: its chain of narration is disconnected at two consecutive levels (mursala mu'adalla). The phrase "in what has reached us" is the addition of Az-Zuhri, as is clear from the expression, as Ibn Hajar declared in his al-Fath. So I [Albani] say: this is something which the Dr. [meaning: Dr. Sa'id Ramadan al-Buti, author of the book which Albani is criticizing] has either forgotten or failed to realize, as he seems to think that every letter of Bukhari's collection must be authentic according to his own conditions. Perhaps he has failed to differentiate between that which has a complete chain of narration and that which has an incomplete chain, just as he failed to differentiate between the authentic narration which contains additions and the inauthentic narration which contains some authentic information. An example of this is the narration of A'isha, which contains at the end of it this inauthentic addition. So know that this addition is not present in any of the narrations with complete authentic chains, which are accepted as proof as I clarified in my book Silsila al-Ahadith ad-Da'ifa, number 4858, and as I pointed out in my commentary on my summarized version of Bukhari's collection." (Difa' 'an al-Hadith an-Nabawi, pages 40-41).

[@MuslimSaiyan]

Other chains of narration are available wherein we find the story about the Prophet (peace be upon him) attempting suicide after the revelation ceased for the first time. All of these chains are rejected and are either falling into the categories of inauthentic or fabricated. From them: 1) The chain of Ibn Mardawayh: Ibn Hajar (may God have mercy on him) said: "there is to be found in the book at-Tafsir of Ibn Mardawayh, via Muhammad bin Kathir on the authority of Ma'mar, the narration without the phrase "in what has reached us", but with the rest of the statement "led him to the cliffs of a mountain." and so forth. Thus, it was rendered as an insertion into the narration of Az-Zuhri on the authority of 'Urwa on the authority of A'isha, and the first version is the reliable one." (Fath al-Bari, volume 12, pages 359-360) The meaning of Ibn Hajar's statement "and the first version is the reliable one" refers to the narration of Az-Zuhri which includes the phrase "in what has reached us" and this phrase is not authentically linked to the chain of narration. Albani (may God have mercy on him) commented in regard to Ibn Hajar's judgment: "he is supported by two points. The first is that Muhammad bin Kathir is a weak narrator - due to his defective memory - and he is also known as as-San'ani al-Masisi. Ibn Hajar said he is honest, but very error-prone, and he is not the same person as Muhammad bin Kathir al-Abdi al-Basri, who is a strong narrator. The second is that this narration contradicts the narration of Abdur Razzaq who narrated from Ma'mar,which distinguished the beginning of the whole quote from the end, and clearly signified the end of it as an addition by Az-Zuhri. All this points to the error of Muhammad bin Kathir as-San'ani for including this addition and it's weakness has been established." (Silsila al-Ahadith ad-Da'ifa wal-Maudu'a, volume 10, page 453).

[@MuslimSaiyan]

chain of Ibn Sa'd: Muhammad bin Sa'd said: Muhammad bin Umar informed us that Ibrahim bin Muhammad bin Abi Musa narrated from Dawud bin al-Hussain from Abu Ghatafan bin Tarif from Ibn Abbas that the Messenger of God (peace be upon him) would spend days without seeing Gabriel and was befallen by a great sadness when the revelation would descend upon him at the cave of Hira. So great was his sadness that he would go to Thubair, or sometimes Hira, wanting to throw himself from them. So he (peace be upon him) would take himself to the top and would hear a voice from the sky at which point the Messenger of God (peace be upon him) would freeze where he was upon hearing the voice, and would then raise his head. Lo and behold, Gabriel was on a chair between the sky and the earth closing in around him and said "O Muhammad, you truly are the Messenger of God and I am Gabriel." Ibn Abbas said: So the Messenger of God (peace be upon him) would leave. God would open his eyes and cause his soul to become firm and the revelations would again continue and satiate his desire. (at-Tabaqat al-Kubra, volume 1, page. 196) Albani (may God have mercy on him) said: "This chain of narration is fabricated. This is either from one of two people. Muhammad bin Umar - and he is al-Waqidi - is accused of fabrication, as Ibn Hajar said in his book at-Taqrib: 'He is abandoned, despite the depth of his knowledge.' The verdicts of the scholars regarding him have preceded more than once. The other person is Ibrahim bin Muhammad bin Abi Musa - and he is Ibn Abi Yahya - and his real name is: Sam'an Al-Aslami the freed man of Abu Ishaq al-Madani. He is abandoned as well just like al-Waqidi or even worse. Ibn Hajar also said about him: 'abandoned,' and narrated in at-Taqrib the critical statements of the scholars regarding him, and they almost constitute absolute consensus on his dishonesty. From those statements is that of al-Harbi: 'The scholars of prophetic tradition loathe his narrations; al-Waqidi narrated on his authority that which resembles fabrication, though al-Waqidi made things worse.' And al-Harbi's statement regarding the chain itself: 'Ibn Abi Musa - and I believe he is in actuality Ibn Abi Yahya, but his name was changed intentionally by al-Waqidi as he has done with others - was stated by Abd al-Ghani bin Sa'id al-Masri to be Ibrahim bin Muhammad bin Abi 'Ata who was criticized by Ibn Juraij. He is also Abd al-Wahhab who was criticized by Marwan bin Mu'awiya and he is Abu adh-Dhi`b who was criticized by Ibn Juraij.'" (Silsila al-Ahadith ad-Dai'fa wal-Maudu'a, volume 10, page 451).

[@MuslimSaiyan]

chain of at-Tabari: Ibn Jarir at-Tabari said: Ibn Humaid said that Salama narrated on the authority of Muhammad bin Ishaq from Wahb bin Kaisan freedman of the people of az-Zubair who heard from Abd Allah bin az-Zubair who said to 'Ubaid bin 'Umair bin Qatada al-Laithi who said: O 'Ubaid, what was the beginning of the prophetic revelation to the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) like back when Gabriel (peace be upon him) came to him? So 'Ubaid said - and Abd Allah bin az-Zubair said that he and those with him were present - that the Messenger of God (peace be upon him) would take off to the cave of Hira for a month every year. Gabriel came to him by the order of God and the Messenger of God (peace be upon him) said: "he came to me, while I was sleeping, with a sort of silk wrapping with a book inside it and said: Read. I asked what I should read, so he seized me until I thought I would face death, and then released me and said: Read. I asked what I should read, and I only said that so he wouldn't grab a hold of me again. He said: {Read in the name of your Lord Who created} up to {He taught man that which he did not know}." The Prophet said: "So I recited it," and then said: "Then it ended and he left me in my sleep and it was as though he had written that book in my heart." He then said: "There was nothing from all of God's creation more hated to me than a poet or a madman; I couldn't even look at such people. He said: I said: indeed this is the furthest person - meaning himself! - from a poet or a madman, as the Quraish never said that about me, to intentionally go to the high barren mountain to throw myself from it in order to kill myself and gain some sort of peace." He said: "So I went out wanting to do exactly that until I was halfway to the mountain when I heard a voice from the sky saying: O Muhammad, truly you are the Messenger of God and I am Gabriel." He said: "I lifted my head to the sky and lo and behold, Gabriel was there in the image of a man with his feet resting at the horizon saying: O Muhammad, you are the Messenger of God and I am Gabriel." (Tarikh at-Tabari, volume 1, pages 532-533) The text of this narration is rejected in light of its contradiction of the authentic versions, for in this version there is a meeting of the Prophet (peace be upon him) with Gabriel in a dream rather than being awake! Also, therein is the statement "what should I read!" Both of these are false. The meeting between the two messengers wasn't during sleep, and that which he (peace be upon him) said was "I can't read," cancelling the ability to read at all, yet this rejected narration holds that he was literate. As for the chain of narration, then Albani (may God have mercy on him) said: "However in this chain there is nothing to be happy about, especially with its contradiction to that which has preceded from the strong narrators. There are several defects. The first is Irsaal, as 'Ubaid bin 'Umair was not from the first generation of Muslims, rather he was from the older members of the second generation having been born during the lifetime of the Prophet (peace be upon him). The second: Salama - and he is Ibn al-Fadl al-Abrash - was said by Ibn Hajar to be an honest man, but very error prone. I [Albani] say: In addition to that, he is contradicted by Ziyad bin Abd Allah al-Bakkaa`i who narrated the book "as-Sira" on the authority of Ibn Ishaq,. Also, via this same route narrated Ibn Hisham, and Ibn Hajar said regarding him: he is an honest man as affirmed in al-Maghazi. Ibn Hisham recorded this narration in as-Sira (volume 1, pages 252-253) from him from Ibn Ishaq without the addition, which I placed between the two brackets [], and between them is the rejected story about considering suicide. It is possible that al-Abrash alone included it in opposition to al-Bakkaa`i and it is thusrejected from another angle due to this opposition, as the narration is recorded without this addition by Ibn Ishaq, as the previous statement of Ibn Hajar indicates. And it is also possible that Ibn Hisham himself left it out of the book due to the narration's false meaning and due to its contradicting the notion of the Prophet's (peace be upon him) infallibility. Ibn Hisham did imply this in the introduction of his book, as he said in volume one, page four: '.leaving out some of what Ibn Ishaq recorded in this book from that which is not authentically reported about the Messenger of God (peace be upon him).and things which indicate the narration's weakness.' And this is all said in regards to the possibility of the narration's being free from the following third defect: Ibn Humaid - and is name is Muhammad ar-Razi - is a very weak narrator. A group of scholars have declared him to be a liar, from them Abu Zur'ah ar-Razi. In short: the narration is inauthentic both in terms of the soundness of its chain and the accuracy of the text. The heart of the believer is not comfortable with the claims of these weak narrators in regards to that which is attributed to the Messenger of God (peace be upon him) as far as considering killing himself by jumping off a mountain. And the Prophet is the one who said - in that which actually is authentically linked to him - that "whoever throws himself from a mountain and kills himself will be in the fires of Hell throwing himself within it forever and ever." This is agreed upon by the two collections of Bukhari and Muslim and in at-Targhib (volume 3, pages 205). This lack of comfort in accepting these claims is especially strong in light of the fact that these weak narrators contradicted the trustworthy scholars whose narrations are accepted and who also transmitted this report." (Silsila al-Ahadith ad-Da'ifa wal-Maudu'a volume 10, pages 455-457).

[@LuisVazquez-hx3bk]

"That Mr. Been disguise as an Arab". 🤣 That what they will say.

[@racecar15]

👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽

[@BADEYE1987]

the man jumped in his aunts grave to do boom boom

[@Dr-EV]

Rob..... Keep dismantling the narrative. And don't stop embarrassing Rumzi.

[@mosheyriver7249]

May this man come to Jesus because he is already an apostate. How can it be authentic and not be authentic at the same time? It is like St Luke says that the information was received from eye witnesses but when they say something we don't like, we say that that part isn't credible.

[@JoeyJoe-pp7gf]

The duct tape religion - Christian Prince. The ( bracket) religion - Christian Prince

[@theblackbull273]

Yes 😂 most information is gathered by hearing not seeing. When you have encounter with a demon these things happens.

[@navierlianthang1045]

Well done, rob. Do more from ramzi.

[@jimshepherd3416]

Taquiyya

[@foapologetics2024]

Tarikh Altabari vil 2 page 298

[@gianlucapagliuca491]

God bless for defending truth☝️🙏🫡

[@warriorofchrist_joshua9606]

not shocking, they literally throw everything under the bus when it doesn't fit the way they want it 😂they cant trust their own sources is all they are telling ppl

[@Cotw.]

Just do a front and center debate with Rumzi, people like to sneak diss but they don’t do front and center debates.

[@boris75723]

I wonder how you can read these garbage books hadiths

[@theprodigy408]

None of the info from the hadiths have the original source lol

[@nunya54]

What? How so?

[@donhinojosa9044]

Between hadiths authentic hadiths interpretations translations imams scholars sheikhs dawah you will be deceived like muhammad was deceived by shayitan through power sex and money.