DCS - Bodenplatte // P-51D Mustang

[@LeifMT]

Loving the DCS content, hope it becomes a staple of the channel.

[@GrmlZGaming]

+LeifMT I think so, there are so many possibilities with the different planes and combined arms.

[@saucejohnson9862]

Above the "No Hand Hold" that's the target wingspan, if you set it to 35 that's about the wingspan of the D-9. Also on the left of that where you set the distance, there's a little switch that will reduce the clutter of your gunsight. Just makes it a little easier imo.

[@bakkenbears3]

really loved this type of video with the whole scenario set-up!

[@pstachowiak1988]

Good job in turning the mission into an interesting story :)

[@mquags690]

This is pretty awesome.

[@tinglydingle]

the F-4U corsair should be out relatively soon, Leatherneck are working on it.

[@davefloyd9443]

How does that comment look today?........

[@MasterChief-sl9ro]

I hear about them adding all these new WWII planes. But never see them 3 years later...

[@hotel_india]

Should consider installing Tacview.

[@darrenprong2632]

so cool. i had no idea DCS 1944 was going to be a thing...

[@AndyAttrition]

Sehr schön geflogen. :)

[@adobo777]

67 inches is hardly pushing the engines hard, and 75 inches post June 44' at which these Mustangs ran at hardly taxed it either.

[@julietsix5486]

Excellent video. I thought they had planned to release the Thunderbolt before the Spitfire though and had already made more progress with that?

[@GrmlZGaming]

+Juliet Six The From the newsletter: "Our goals for DCS World War II remain unchanged and are still focused on a stable of WWII aircraft in addition to a 1944 map of Northern France with period ground units. We hope to finish the Spitfire IX in mid-2016 followed by the P-47D at the end of the year. We will also continue to fine-tune the P-51D, Fw 190 and Bf 109."

[@julietsix5486]

Interesting. When they first announced the P-47D work was much further already having the full cockpit graphically modelled whereas the Spitfire was only sketched back at that point.

[@AeroeGraphix]

I lost my shit when you said the 262 is coming

[@patt0riz0r]

Great video, GrmlZ. What is your oppinion about the AI in this game? The 190s didn't seem to be too big of a challange.

[@GrmlZGaming]

+patt0riz0r K-4s at the highest setting will give you a run for your money at first, but still, they are just AI, which wont ever be the same as a real person.

[@FahrenheitUK]

MOAR

[@-blackwolves-swift9426]

Are you going to play naval action just like Bismarck or will you stick to flights simulation games ?

[@NathanMulder]

Are you enjoying DCS more or Warthunder more?

[@GrmlZGaming]

+Nathan M The way WT is currently looking, do you realy have to ask?

[@holly5234]

Would love to see much more of this game its so much nicer and unlike WT is balenced and historical BTW What where you playing on Multiplayer?

[@GrmlZGaming]

+PanzerNick Just showing a friend the game, fun thing talking someone live through the startup of the plane. :D

[@Dmochkin]

+GrmlZGaming More similar videos would be awesome. It's actually a nice learning experience!

[@SirFlausch]

Good Video! If you'd have to compare Warthunder's and DCS' flight models of the P-51 what are the differences? I myself don't like the Mustang in Warthunder as it's elevator handles kinda funny. So I was wondering if this is realistic or just a flaw in Warthunder's flight model.

[@saucejohnson9862]

It's a flaw in the WT flight model.

[@mordimustafa1275]

***** all WT planes have broken flight model (quantity over quality) ! its that simple

[@Dmochkin]

+Mordi Mustafa Years ago...roughly 5(?) when it was still in RU CBT, Gaijin used to post about "balanced" planes from time to time. By balanced I mean the planes had their flight models set up, otherwise they are usually either a copy-paste from some placeholder plane or simply a "computerized" calculation based on characteristics. In fact, one of the first planes set up was Bf109E-3 and the old IL-2 Sturmovik pilots used to fly only it. Soon after the game was released the whole flight model setup and cockpit development seized and the dev become more concerned in making premium captured planes (even though originally they would temp ban people who put enemy side's markings on their plane and go fly in old nonmarker RB) and lackluster tonks. I honestly miss the old CBT times, it was way too much fun.

[@TitanCalE]

check out Operation Blue Flag for DCS - Community build campaign with a lot of action and stufff going on. Very mature and friendly group that will be more than happy to help get you started if needed to be.

[@mordimustafa1275]

lol you were punishing the engine!!!

[@FantasticPyroclastic]

in real life your an auctioneer right? :D

[@dogeness]

Wonder why they limited the P-51D to 67" in this game. In real life, the US P-51Ds in Europe were running 70-75"Hg. I've also heard (But not seen any documents yet) that the P-51D could run 81"Hg for five minutes in the Pacific. The 67"Hg P-51D in DCS is a shadow of its real-life self and, frankly, bullshit. No P-51D EVER ran 67"Hg in combat. 67"Hg was only used by P-51Bs early on, and even the Bs were upgraded to at least 70"Hg.

[@axised001]

Kurfürst please :)

[@GrmlZGaming]

+axised001 They will all show up sooner or later. :)

[@axised001]

GrmlZGaming great work ;) looking forward for upcoming content.

[@LHFurious]

+GrmlZGaming if you dont have the Kurfürst or Dora i have both of them i can lead you my account if you need it ;) send me a pm if youre instrested

[@GrmlZGaming]

+LHFurious I have them. :)