Debunking God's Chorus of Crickets

The claims surrounding the recording God's Chorus of Crickets are sensational and point to a natural harmony that we as humans are unable to perceive. But do these claims stand up to reality? We take a deep dive to find out.
Original recording by Jim Wilson
Vector art courtesy of Vecteezy
Listen to the original here - • God's Cricket Chorus ...

[@bluntsafety]

Thanks for this explanation. I recorded young frogs that appeared to be singing in a chorus and then another group chirped in yet another key! It sounded angelic.

[@marcusphotina]

If they would have just said "Sampled crickets played on a keyboard" it would have been impressive enough.

[@stephaniecrow6000]

I have experienced this myself while recording crickets and slowed it down on my iPhone. 1000% sounded like an angelic choir, so say what you want. Never shared this info with anyone before, so nothing to gain 🤷‍♀️

[@julzcaramel9776]

Sameeee I was absolutely amazed 🫶

[@InlikeMikeQuinn]

How did you slow it down on your iphone?

[@ABCDEFGHFU]

Yes And l have an ocean-front house for sale in Prague 🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦

[@profquad]

false. i've done it to. the program you used probably used reverb to smooth it out

[@MrLuckyMuffin]

@@ABCDEFGHFUhow much is it?

[@isefunk]

did jim wilson ever actually claim this was completely unedited recordings or claim anything religious about it, or did he just title the album "god's chorus of crickets" cause it fits the music and then people for some reason just assumed it was actually proof of god?

[@SirAndacar]

I never believed this was a "real" unmodified sound of crickets. But as others have noted, it is a beautiful little piece of music even if it isn't a miracle.

[@Marimomae]

Can I listen to a longer version of the audio at 2:09? It's so creepy and I want more of it

[@justafellow5859]

please release your pitch alteration slowed down cricket chirping it's the most threatening thing I've ever heard and i love it

[@1976MLM]

Still sounds beautiful.

[@paulmuaddib3470]

You can play about with speed etc but music is only beautiful to the appreciation of the ears it falls on, cricket song is surly a track of the makers chorus just like bird song Beethoven and wind In the trees, or it all could just be noise, your choice , unfortunately some people see nothing in a sunset and get annoyed with bird and cricket song etc, (spiritually unconscious) I wish a reading this well 🙂

[@Seraitsukara]

I've always loved that song. It's a shame they couldn't have been honest with how they made it. Doesn't detract from it's beauty at all to learn they did more than slow down cricket chirps.

[@CoastGhost156]

His second attempt at slowing down cricket sounds sound more like jazz than a godly chorus. Now I’m thinkin about crickets playing jazz :) 🎺🦗

[@laurel9629]

Admittedly the 14% pitch-varying version does sound a lot like human voices, but in a distinctly "uncanny valley" way.

[@zerozerohero7189]

"Distinctly uncanny valley" lol those expressions are in opposition to each other hehe

[@laurel9629]

@@zerozerohero7189 They really are. It’s almost.... *uncanny*

[@zerozerohero7189]

@@laurel9629 lol i see what you did there

[@rebecaguerra2930]

The original done by Jim Wilson, is set to the hymn “ How Great Thou Art” using crickets. Try a mashup.

[@warnerstrauss7930]

THANK YOU !!!!! This was driving me nuts when a friend recently introduced it to me. I understood the concept, but it just couldn't be so harmonic and choral sounding. However, I big enough not to throw this in my friends face......it makes him happy, and the truth would just remove this for him...Still a gorgeous piece of work. again thx.

[@yesok2954]

What program are you using?

[@highercallingmusic9240]

wow nice work here.. i'm learning to use the power of my skepticism as well as watching the rigour of investigation! thank you

[@suzter]

oh man! you forgot ONE critical aspect to really disprove: You failed to also slow down the actual isolated cricket track that was laid over the slowed crickets (you pulled out the slower track and sped it up). I know, what you did should be enough...but still, it would have been interesting to hear his actual full speed crickets slowed down to see if they were even the same track?

[@davidscott2821]

It doesn't matter....the harmonic part is the important bit. It's all hokum.

[@enant]

The single not slowed down cricket is just another recording go add to the aesthetics. The slowed down recording is multiple crickets and not a single one, also

[@javaally1203]

I recorded one and slowed it down ... it sounded like an alien sci fi movie

[@tinamcbride8682]

@@javaally1203 melodic or noisy?

[@javaally1203]

@@tinamcbride8682 Melodic in a very dark way like crying angels over a nuclear wasteland

[@johnlanou]

Could you post the full Wilson track with the normal-speed crickets removed?

[@__WJK__]

Strange how the channel owner never repsonds to really goodfollow up comments, or requests.

[@Critter145]

It kinda sounds like Neon Genesis Evangelion when the Angels attack

[@harleypayj11]

Your reference made my day

[@Critter145]

Harley-Payj Leatherman that makes me happy to hear!🙂

[@XxacousticsecretsxX]

I wish he would have been honest that it is altered. Even so the unaltered sound of crickets still leaves me in awe of God’s creation. Beautiful none the less. All of creation reflects His glory

[@UhLeeSeeJah]

Yes you are absolutely right! I was meditating in my car with the windows opened and then I heard the crickets. Everything else in the background faded and all I heard was crickets. The more I relaxed the more I started to her a melody ring in my ear. It was so beautiful. Then I started to realize that the crickets were praising God! I remember it’s Friday evening… the SABBATH!!!! If it were any other day of the week they wouldn’t be singing so sweet. That made me realize that there is a God , a God of music.

[@rayredwine4808]

@@UhLeeSeeJah Praise God glory to him and he made all things and it is good.

[@Thirteen13s]

evolution for sure.

[@kimberlypyle2303]

@@UhLeeSeeJah yes it is BEAUTIFUL. And the reason we know beauty is because there is a creator of it. We create evil from self. Self cause self will.

[@Bizzare77777]

Now can you debunk the claims about plants harmonizing music??? Thanks!

[@steven_83_massini]

Thank you for this video. I had the feeling that the sound was not actually real

[@megamonkeyblaster3627]

My understanding is it's a specific song, a mating call. Any thoughts on that?

[@jamesp8441]

One big problem with your 'debunking'. Your recording of crickets was a continuous chirping with no rests - no beats. Jim Wilson's was one of pulsing - chirps followed by brief silences, like we very often hear. So you debunked yours, not his, as they were two very different things. What you should have done, was slow HIS down - you seem to have been able to isolate it and remove it, so you should have slowed that one down. THAT would have been proof. You did not do that, however.

[@anib9634]

Why didn’t he also slow down the original speed audio in addition to speeding up the slowed down version? I would also like to hear the regular speed slowed down just to see how much different it was…how much manipulation did it require.

[@__WJK__]

I agree and it's too bad all we've heard from the OP in response (in over a year) is, nothing but... crickets. (I couldn't resist)

[@ibikongol4465]

Do you know about slowing down bird singing? They are compliete tenor arias

[@miguelpablo7278]

the Flower Duet was done by finches

[@justcody4615]

My first impression seeing the other patterns was actually that it must have been birds "corrupting" the audio, since the file of the crickets played back was very noisy and cluttered. But I havent listened to the full video (I actually find the audio creepy and not soothing) so youd know more than me about whether the audio pattern matches up to musical notes on a synthesizer. Strongly dislike the existence of God being thrown into a viral audio sample though.

[@rorysimpson8716]

Always loved the original piece without the woo woo implications that made it viral.

[@FernandoAntonioDosSantos]

The debunked process is very clear. Congratulations. Still is possible to find the music without those manipulations. - Slowing process also, from what is available to public, still have some artifacts that can destroy the natural dynamics and harmonies by treating the sound in more agreable concepted form no most of Humans. One important info/question, or focus is exactly what we have to learn to hear, and what we have to use to be able to record the other sounds that our hears may, or can not listen. Hey! great piece of work , Congratulations

[@jules9628]

So how about the low rumble of elephants that can hear each other miles apart? Is that fake too?

[@manmadetrees]

Oh man I appreciate this more than the original recording. Thank you for bringing the world back to reality.

[@MadHatter42]

Awesome and logical debunking, my dude. Shame the guy couldn’t just be satisfied with making cool-sounding cricket music, he had to add some pseudo-spiritual nonsense to get extra views.

[@mightywhite360]

Yeah, getting extra views wasn't really a thing back in the 90s.

[@kristenlandon1538]

True!

[@franklinear]

Interesting. Does not take into account the possibility maybe not all crickets are singing all the time, but only certain occasions. Also debunkers crickets sounded in very different frequency from those in original video. Could account for their not showing up much in low register when slowed down to that degree. Different species, time of year, recording equipment, amplification, and acoustics of the surrounding environment could all play in. Could be a scam like he said, but could still also be genuine given the possibilities for variation.

[@the.urbanite]

Why is everyone a liar and scammer these days?

[@CatherineSTodd]

The musician who made he oiginal recording of crickets isn't really a "liar and scammer" as the piece of music is out there for FREE, but he should not have said that it was not "manipulated." Don't know why someone woud say that when it's not true. But it's still a beautiful "song of the universe."

[@jackbizzell7136]

You say that like people haven't been lying since we evolved speech back when we were living as hunter gatherers in Africa. Get out of here with that "back in my day" bullshit lmao

[@rubengherrera]

because it's profitable

[@Sheerspeechcraft]

The original was created nearly 30 years ago

[@capnmo6718]

These days?

[@txgreasemonkey]

Was the original recording recorded on tape? If so, seems like wow and flutter would play a part in the slowed down version. But I’m guessing you didn’t consider that.

[@jakegggggggggggg]

Shit!! I just listened and was in awe. Shame it’s not legit! I wonder how the process to create the song went for the musician. It’s still an amazing piece of art.

[@ResonantHarmony]

Additionally, the slowed down version of a bunch of crickets did have the same tonality as the original recording. Slowing down a whole bunch of crickets could never give the detail of a melody of one cricket. So when he slowed it down, it created the exact result that you would expect, when one cricket creates a melody.

[@korkulorjensen2563]

I just listened to crickets at 800 * the speed slow down I guess you can say that and they sounded like they were singing and we're in chorus bro a person slowed it down from regular speed he did it increments to 50 5 then 100 times slow down and they were singing bro you can hear a little chorus in the background what are you talking about

[@juanvargas174]

Point is . Don't fully believe everything on the internet lol. Especially now with AI

[@larasrealm3311]

Very interesting and well done. We need such rational debunking because fake doesn’t help the cause. Two observations: first of all, when you really slow down the original sound to the actual difference of life span, it’s almost inaudible for the human ear. That is not a problem though as it would be legitimate to rise the frequency by sonification. The higher octaves still reflect the same quality of the original sound as well as eventual harmony. So, it would be legitimate to rise the frequency to make the sound audible while keeping the slowed down speed. Second, whether there’s harmony in this would still have to be analyzed with single animals. I don’t know anything about crickets and their sounds and maybe this has already been done. However, this universe exists on an underlying harmony reflecting order vs chaos. Even the planets move with “harmonics”, as already shown by Johannes Kepler. We have harmonics in sound and colors, and in biology (i.e. Phi or the so called “Golden Ratio”). This means that there’s necessarily harmony in everything until its decay.

[@LaineyTsang]

Yes!! These are my thoughts as well.

[@garyharvey1195]

Is there a big, big reason why you slowed down the first sample to 10% and the second sample to 14%? I like that human cricket lifespan part, I couldn't do the math that fast, but it disproved the claim he makes on his video.

[@__WJK__]

That's a good Qs, I wonder if he'll ever respond(?)

[@truthoverfalsehood__8757]

The slowed down cricket sound sounded like a choir to me it sounded near the chorus , there are over 900 species of crickets and they also make different sounds during different times , a disturbed cricket wont sound as relaxed crickets when thex are just chilling. Bit the one slowed down cricket sound you sjowed sounds chorus to me already.

[@berntoast3186]

On the right summer night when it's not too hot and not too cold, you can hear their chorus if youre lucky and listen. 😉

[@pben4218]

I heard the Original made in 1920's. You can't debunk this.

[@__WJK__]

Very interesting... how about a link so we know exactly what you are referring to(!)

[@alanmoralesmex]

Wow! How does this not have more views? Your content is amazing! Subscribed! 😄

[@bdelleyofficial]

If the crickets in the original recording were singing a harmonious tune, then of course it would look like music notes when translated into a spectrogram. The recording you played that you said was "light-years away" from Wilson's actually sounds pretty similar in my opinion. It just sounds like a different song... I'm not saying Wilson's recording wasn't manipulated, or that all of his claims surrounding the recording are factual, but I don't think you disproved anything here.

[@jonathanfegel307]

Highly disagree. As an audio engineer and musician, the methods used here were sound (no pun intended)

[@blueangel9544]

It would have been nice if it was real. It would have been beautiful. The music is beautiful. But it would be a beautiful concept of the crickets had done that themselves.

[@GODISGOOD3612]

But the sound of nature is harmonious no matter. Besides we don't know what the sounds in the heaven realm really sounds like. I love the sounds at night..crickets , katydids, Cicadas etc..just beautiful

[@ppinchera8225]

nice work here sound med , for myself I wasn't all that impressed with the recording. I've got an air conditioner that sounds like a forest full of crickets.

[@__WJK__]

You're completly missng the point... air conditioners are man made objects, while crickets are not. To go deeper into the point... while (most) science is helpful/good, the actually reality is, science can only "reverse engineer" what's already here. So make no mistake, try as they might, science/sceintists still cannot create a living breathing cricket out of thin air, or create any other type of biological life out of thin air.

[@cuddie]

Tik Tok?

[@linaje3459]

From the account, conornoburst?!!?

[@tamcon72]

It's making the rounds again, and my goodness, but people are gullible! Thanks for debunking this. How cheap these ploys are. They cheapen people's spiritual leanings and, in the case of "God's Chorus of Crickets," cheapen our understanding of insects and their inherent complexity. ThanksForPosting!

[@polaroidsky]

I gotta hand it to Jim though, that was dang clever

[@aleethanone6904]

does sound unlike crickets i've heard once you speed up the song but how is that proving its modified? just saying its obvious doesn't make it a proof does it? i mean what if someone comes out with a video debunking your debunking and when they speed up the cricket song it sounds normal and they say "see obviously he modified the file cause it doesn't sounds like this". anyways leaning toward what you said just saying for people who haven't explored it themselves just be open to it for now.

[@singingway]

Thank you for doing this.

[@rivolumeme]

What incredible video

[@f.d.3289]

As the Nerd Crew would say: Veeeeeeery coooool :D Thanks! Still a great piece of sound though.

[@valmarsiglia]

Some of it sounds like a György Ligeti choral work.

[@ekmickley]

What difference does it make, if you like the music, and it makes you feel great? Why do people have to tear things up that have a positive flavor to it?

[@robcallicotte5786]

Crickets? That sounded like more than only crickets you recorded. Crickets chirp. And with more deliberate breaks and patterns. Not just a blur of noises from the woods at night. Not saying your discovery doesn't have truth in it, because it was clearly some sort of combination crickets with an instrument of some sort. But, let's hear actual crickets, like outside someone's window or in their garage, and then slow those down. This could get interesting, I think.

[@CyndiCraven]

Thank you for this.

[@frankensplean]

Nice analysis, except for that grasshopper-looking human hand at the end. Keep in mind there's analog slowing down with the accompanying pitch drop, then there's digital "slowing down" which is just stretching (and filling). e.g. trololooowwww kzbin.info/www/bejne/aHm9coWbqtFsf7M or the youtube speed setting.

[@majidifan5846]

Sounds like a bee hive. Or the music played in “2001 a Space Odyssey” when the monolith was featured

[@jsnew3154]

Seems a bit strange to me that because the less adulterated recording (slowed) sounds less pleasing, meaningful, less familiar and less devine to many of us that some would be dissatisfied. Considering we are not the centre of the universe- and the crickets have evolved this as to compliment mating, territory, communication about what crickets care about- whether we appreciate it for what it is or feel the need to manipulate is of no concern to them. The whole perception of time vs lifespan is a comforting way to avoid the existential nagging that so many seem to feel when faced with a seemingly simple being with such a tiny lifespan. The truth is somewhere in the middle. Different species can have different time perceptions- but it doesn't necessarily mean that a shorter lived species will view it's life from a proportional perspective to human decades. And for a species so different to us in form and behaviour- does that even matter? Certainly it doesn't matter to them. We could imagine a star gaining sentence observing the earth; it might see our lives as pointless and less so because humans live only for less than a century while stars can 'live' for hundreds of millions to billions of years (or depending on the star maybe much longer). That imagined star would of course be incorrect. Within human terms our lives are meaningful. Thats the same for crickets- to a cricket it's life is as meaningful as it can be to it- and it won't be comparing itself with humans.

[@wilasco_]

nice video man thanks

[@TavsKnitspace]

Why would you spoil this for everyone!

[@__WJK__]

Good video but it would have been so much better if "sound meditation" would have collaborated with the original content creator and asked how, when and where he created the original piece. This way we would have a more accurate representation of all the the circumstances and facts involved.

[@urbanecobeauty]

God only creates beauty and he always uses sound - He “spoke” to create everything, goes back to sound frequency - and we as humans do not hear 👂 all the countless sounds until we start paying attention as to how to truly listen. 👉 Psalm 148: 7-10 … Praise the LORD … all creeping things of the earth (song of praise)

[@anitaicenhour7084]

That's better than the other one. Just slowed down it sounds amazing. They both are beautiful to hear, though.

[@MinisterRoy205]

Nature played together, let alone human intervention has a melody. Though one more chaotic like jazz

[@msluvan4634]

well he made a great job 'cause It sounds beatifully

[@hatespeechisntreal]

That's the sound you hear in a horror movie rite B4 you die by the monster

[@kward8996]

Does it matter if it has human voices included. That just strengthens the beautiful link with humans and nature, whatever it is, it’s beautiful.

[@DarkHourParanormal]

Well done mate.

[@awk30lb]

So effectively, the sound in and of itself can exist in the “melody” pitch given all the sample of crickets and their variability. And because he used a keyboard, you suggest this is a false claim. I think this is a perspective issue. I believe the deeper claim he was trying to make was; if nature exalts God, all around the world, with all the crickets that’s exist, with all the variability in cricket sounds they make, (G)od in fact could hear his own symphony. One cricket in America could be singing in sync with another cricket across the world, yet still, to (G)od it is one masterpiece. And to your lifespan point, that wasn’t the main driving force of his video, it was the curiosity that got him close to the adjustment of audio that produced the beautiful sound. It does not detract anything from the big picture point that was trying to be made. Your video proves your prospective and the method to achieving the audio famously known, however, it does not disprove “God’s cricket choir”. I suggest a title change.

[@hannahjane5034]

Yes I totally agree. I think it would produce the harmonic result if different regions of crickets were used in one recording.

[@szurnietyzdzisaw9206]

Thats a great example of a fantastic , abstract thinking!

[@jam1966ful]

If my Auntie had a beard she Could be my Uncle.

[@awk30lb]

jam1966ful Close, but no Cigar. A cricket will always be a cricket, and a cricket noise will always be a cricket noise.

[@paulmuaddib3470]

You can play about with speed etc but music is only beautiful to the appreciation of the ears it falls on, cricket song is surly a track of the makers chorus just like bird song Beethoven and wind In the trees, or it all could just be noise, your choice 🙂

[@labarbiegirl44]

You played the original audio back at a way too fast speed, that is far too high pitched to be the natural sound of crickets meaning you backward engineered it incorrectly.

[@damenwhelan3236]

Oh. QI on BBC television is not going to be happy abiut this.

[@robertszymanski717]

I'm with what this guy says here about the crickets singing! From the beginning of the video and me thinking...I can do the very same thing with my 4 track recorder! Splice " here and there" and rearrange the chirping and then transfer onto a c.d. or Mp3 ..... The sounds of crickets slowed way way down is very weird and eerie, but there's no chorus style singing.....lol.....

[@jonpatchmodular]

And it isn't even that far from the claims, when you speed it up it's like just a chord of crickets and the layered cricket sound, nothing else

[@awalkamongthetombstones]

But what if the crickets are singing in rounds

[@Robert_Fordin]

But however, it still sounds nice.

[@mrsmelons5553]

Well done. Thank you.

[@lisa.66]

Thanks for ruining this for me!! But also, the full speed recording of crickets in his piece is very different from the 2 that you used. But I get the point... damn I wanted this to be real!

[@highercallingmusic9240]

it's true i'm not totally convinced, but definately presented some good hypothesis as to your debunking theory.. i liked your use and knowledge of the spectrum-graph and how to read harmonics etc.. very logical

[@highercallingmusic9240]

I also really liked how your simply debunking the claim it was a claim to be unmanipulated... you did it with class, with style, respect, and care..

[@Saxyct]

@@highercallingmusic9240 I know it's not easy to grasp immediately, above all for those who are not familiar with sound and acoustics. I'm a professional in this field, and I can confirm everything from this video. it's a hand made audio track very well created by a skilled technician to trick naive religious people. and unfortunately he reached his goal.

[@pben4218]

No keyboard in 1920s. This recording is screwed up. I might have the original. It is REAL.

[@bonnieraguet1546]

😂 say what you want- His creation praises Him and groans for His return. His word says if we don’t praise His name then the rocks and hills will cry out- if He says things cry out and sing I’ll believe Him over you.😊

[@bradkarkos629]

This is haunting, to me it sounds my hellish

[@wj11jam78]

When you do it for real, it sounds like 2001. Perhaps if we collect all the crickets together, they will take us through the universe at faster than light speeds until we die and become a space baby?

[@LaineyTsang]

😂😂😂👏🏽👏🏽

[@davidestoppey23]

There is one aspect of all this that everyone misses, yet it is very obvious. Not one cricket "note" would be possible, nor would the "note" from a bird, or any other creature that choraled, chortled, chirped, cheeped or trilled without the one entity that made it all possible - God

[@DedRucktheDuck]

that’s an assumption you make, it is not necessarily a fact

[@eCoArise]

"God has been thoroughly debunked as well." ~ God

[@theglobalfirm]

That portrays how dangerous theism is.

[@Danielle-jw9gy]

I’ve believed this shiz my whole life! Kinda heartbreaking now knowing the truth! 😢

[@__WJK__]

Even without the piano harmony added in, there's still some pretty cool natural musical undertones being produced by the crickets

[@paolatotaro9093]

you have to slow it down 280 times! it was not done in the video!

[@Saxyct]

it doesn't matter. the number of times you slow an audio track down depends on its duration and length. I know you are not convinced because this video ruins the beauty of the original one, but that is just a fake audio track made to fool people who are easy to persuade.

[@paolatotaro9093]

@@Saxyct thank you

[@Jobe-13]

Still kind of sounds like music but really cool.

[@James-yr5wv]

excellent analysis - but the grasshopper at the end instead of a cricket lol *facepalm*

[@itskevinjustkevin]

2:10 I'm getting flashbacks to that seen in 2001 a space Odyssey

[@wj11jam78]

My thoughts exactly. The monolith.

[@patricknoel9096]

We all share the harmony of earth is just there rythem

[@patricknoel9096]

Bet you something silly if you take a cricket harmony and the density n slow pace of a human or other more dynamic you'd make a means of excellerating distant environment n be able to do the same. Remote life support could be planetary noise n discharge can be travel as well supports of alternative resources including in space

[@ResonantHarmony]

The video doesn’t make sense. Could be true but his analysis and arguments don’t make sense. First they never tried slowing down 1 cricket. There is no way lots of crickets could make such a sound. Second when they sped it up, it did sound like quite like crickets. And, is conclusion that it was played on a keyboard does not make sense at all. If you listen closely, he never actually explains how he came up with that conclusion precisely. His explanation of harmonics not being there made no sense to me at all… and if anyone should understand it would be me… I wrote the number one selling books in both Audio Recording and Sound Healing. And, to be able to play a keyboard synthesizer that then sounds like crickets when sped up would be genius. This whole thing smells like Christian debunking to me. What does God have to do with any of this. Actually, after having listened to him speeding it up and it sound very much like crickets makes me believe it even more now. That would be really hard to do electronically on a keyboard.

[@krisztianvarga182]

Thank you your research, fact finder work.

[@frogmanencountersradio5462]

Ever thought the message wasn't for you?.. How great you must be to have even the insect recount this song. You of nothing but stumbling into things, you (have to comprehend) old is the earth and even older its ways. Through gentile pushes and groaning of the spirit those who learn to be quiet are taught. These mysteries are not for the unbeliever. It will be as foolishness to you. "If you choose to be blind I will blind you with my right hand and you will not see)

[@jonboypatton]

Never believed it anyway.

[@eleuther8]

still sounds amazing. the sound is vibration of earth either way.

[@MadHatter42]

Yeah, but by that standard, every sound is a “vibration of the earth”, isn’t it? The human voice is as natural as the cricket’s chirp. And the crickets’ chirp was modulated to sound melodious, just like the human voice in a church choir.

[@eleuther8]

@@MadHatter42 pretty much!

[@myfriendbro]

🙏🙏🙏🙏