DEEP DIVE on the REMASTERED CLERIC in Pathfinder 2e (Feats, divine + domain spells!)

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

ADDITIONS/ERRATA: -As has been pointed out elsewhere, the revised Armor Proficiency general feat scales to expert at Level 13! The warpriest can alternatively take this feat to get heavy armor proficiency. -I didn't catch that the L20 Avatar's Protection feat negates the critical hit, which definitely makes it better. I'm still not sure it stacks up to the other L20 feats though!

[@Xacris]

I'm SOOOO glad that the Divine Font is no longer tied to charisma! What a boon for all dwarven clerics!

[@pierreolivierlepage664]

And to all cleric that want to wield a weapon without having to choose between "being able to hit" and heal more...

[@Ogrimmygrimgrim]

Harrim breaths a sigh of relief, except he still can't use a flail well, lol

[@agsilverradio2225]

Yeah. Why would that not be to wisdom in the first place, like every other cleric abillity?! ... A cleric I wanted to make, is based on a character that has dumped charisma, (specificly low intimidation,) by being such a cinimon roll that nobody takes her seriously.

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

@@agsilverradio2225Some people might want to (and I've seen this happen) dump Wisdom and go all-in as a frontline-fighting support dude.

[@GabrielBishop]

@@TheRulesLawyerRPGi think some of the most fun in pf2e is when you do go “off script” like this and for the most part there is a path that makes it work. Everytime i went off and tried to do something in 5e i ended up making a whole new class. I like what the remaster is doing to make the archetypes more useful (like the spell attack proficiency) I would highly recommend everyone to use free archetype optional rules

[@tinear4]

“I’m here to kick a* and cast Heal… and I’m all out of Heals.” Seriously, though, Ronald, this is the best Remaster video so far. Thank you.

[@kevincressman1267]

"Some people may think of thanking me in the comments for putting this [table] up on the screen; not necessary, i did this because i was annoyed." Iconic.

[@Tom_Book]

Oh Paizo and its cryptic verbiage. "If you failed to counteract but you would have if its counteract rank were 2 or lower, instead suppress the effect until the beginning of your next turn." could have simply been rephrased to "If you failed the counteract check by 2 or less, the effect is instead suppressed until the beginning of your next turn."

[@SanguineSidereal]

Those two sentences mean two very different things. The one in the remaster means you can suppress things of two more ranks than you can remove. So I could cure a Rank (Spell Level) 5 curse and suppress a Rank 7 curse. The one you suggest just increases your chance of succeeding at the counteract rank by 10% and does not allow you to effect higher Rank things.

[@SwingRipper]

35:10 A fair nerf... To compensate for the SECRET BUFFS TO WRESTLER!

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

Looking forward to the Remastered Wrestler vid!

[@KrezalSkog]

Time to suplex trains!

[@devondriggers3580]

Secret buffs to wrestler? I want to be in on the secret. Lol

[@lordcirth]

@@devondriggers3580 Monster Grabs (and Trips etc) now roll (outside of MAP) instead of being automatic, which means Wrestler's various bonuses against maneuvers are more useful.

[@queenannsrevenge100]

OOH YEAH, BROTHER! 🤼‍♂️

[@blaydsong]

That wrestler shot on SwingRipper was very on-point. 😁

[@eyeh0]

The Cleric getting this much love makes me so happy and I hope the Oracle gets the same when it’s remastered. Divine casters, go!

[@abs0lutelyn0t44]

I've never played Pathfinder before, but the new War Priest additions make me want to play one! I'm glad you're making these videos for newbies like me, it really helps when learning about the system overall

[@pierreolivierlepage664]

I like that you can now make a warpriest with strenght and wisdom while still being a good healer...

[@christophersteeves9435]

I can finally play my Shelyn warpriest and feel good about using my glaive for once! This is great!

[@grandpretredesalpagas4665]

Go Gay Godess !

[@jamespuckett9753]

Looking forward to this game. Your class breakdowns will be mandatory watching in my group.

[@KnightsofLastCall]

"New" Cleric looks great. Great and much-needed changes to class and Divine spell list.

[@davidhigdon794]

So, depending on the enemy, the Avatar's Protection can be better than Channeling Block. First, since it turns the critical into a normal hit, they don't get deadly, fatal, or any other critical riders. That alone can save a decent chunk of health, if not life-saving in other ways. I don't have time right now for extensive research, but on a quick glance it looks like PL+3 enemies are easily averaging 30+ damage on a normal hit. That means another huge chunk negated from turning the crit into a success. And then on top of all that you get the temporary hit points from the transformation. On paper at least, it looks really good to me! We'll have to see how things go in the near future.

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

I missed the negating the crit part! Thanks. (Adding to pinned comment) Yeah I hesitate to say it's "trash" because what matters in the end for assessing things is how they performs on the margins. Staving off knockouts and death is "situational," but a situation you don't want to be in!

[@pblaveh]

The feat looks pretty good to me. The crit negation can be really impactful as you pointed out, but the pure action economy advantage of casting a rank 10 two-action spell as a reacation is amazing, even if it is only once per day. I can only see 2 downsides: 1. You have to prepare Avatar each day you want to use it. 2. Being in Avatar Form might not be all that great anymore. Unless they buffed Avatar, its attack modifier for warpriests isn't any better than what you have with your favorite weapon anyway (and might in fact be 1 lower!). And you can't use many of they great new cleric feats while in avatar state.

[@bryanstrahm9961]

Fortunate Relief is probably one of the most understated but personally incredible feats I've seen. This is such a flavorful feat and so perfect for a supporting cleric. Thematic, mechanically strong without being a "must-pick", S Tier feat design.

[@great-roleplaying-debbie]

ive been checking out some of your older content and the improvements are MASSIVE. you've really grown as a presenter! better presentation, more confident. great editing. on such crunch as well!!

[@KajtekBeary]

100% agree! I love to listen to his videos now.

[@SlamDancinMoogle]

Am I crazy? at 18:32 you say that you don't have to cast the heal or harm spell in order to increase your shield's hardness via Channeling Block, but it does require that you expend one of those spells, effectively (but not mechanically) casting it.

[@Rarzon21]

Cleanse Affliction having both a 2-action icon and a '1 minute' cast time is confusing. Assume its supposed to be the latter considering the cast time of the original spells pre-remaster?

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

Unable to dig into it right now, but I think what would make sense is for the 2 action version to work on a fast operating poison for sure. The others can wait!

[@lordcirth]

Pretty sure that's a typo - though I don't know which it's supposed to be. There seem to be a lot of typos in the book :(

[@simmysims2923]

FYI, on page 415 (under Gaining and Losing Actions): "The most restrictive form of reducing actions is when an effect states that you can’t act: this means you can’t use any actions, or even speak." So when the rules state that you can't act, they are referring to a specific mechanical effect spelled out here.

[@eamk887]

And what exactly does this have anything to do with the video?

[@BlueTressym]

@@eamk887 the video mentioned the Stunned condition, which has been a subject of debate regarding whether the intent was for a Stunned creature to be unable to act at all.

[@eyeh0]

Wow, all the condition cleansing spells clearly work on undead now except for Sound Body because it’s the only one with the vitality trait. Neat!

[@illoney5663]

Divine Attribute did already exist, it's listed on AoN (though under the name "Divine Ability"). Though it's only tied to the background as far as I can tell.

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

Ah must have been a thing when that Background was released. Maybe Gods & Magic?

[@zachariahmerry2396]

@@TheRulesLawyerRPG Correct! Was first made a thing in Gods & Magic and stuck around ever since.

[@Olimar92]

IF you need an example on how Holy and Unholy work, just look at the Jabberwok and Vorpal. Vorpal isn't a Damage type, it's specifically a Rune. The Jabberwok is weak to that Rune.

[@undrhil]

09:00 Define ability / attribute has always been listed there..... at least as far back as July when I started looking into a deity from my Goblin Champion for your quest for the Frozen flame campaign:-)

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

Yes I think it's post-CRB and comes from whatever Lost Omens book included that particular Background

[@Keovar]

41:05 - Of course it's biblical. "Flame Strike" was based on the pillar of fire that led the Israelites through the wilderness in the Exodus myth.

[@cheezeofages]

I enjoy that it seems like the pure alignment damage AoEs like Divine Wrath that previously didn't hit good aligned allies are now hard-coded to only target enemies so it retains that benefit with the spirit damage changes. So retroactively tables can errata spells outside core like Radiant Beam to retain that benefit. In fact it's better if your group includes people that put evil on their character sheet. Because now that evil PC working with the team isn't hit by it when they would previously be.

[@agsilverradio2225]

That's the evil character's fault, for playing a character who's morals are incompatable with the rest of the party's! Same goes for good pcs in evil campaigns.

[@56Bagels]

19:48 A lot of the language from the books suggest that "Hit" equates to "An action deals damage," although it's not clear. That's how I always rule it.

[@datonkallandor8687]

Last time I went on a deep dive on "hit" I came to the conclusion it only refers to the results of an attack roll. Save spells don't "hit", as far as I could find. But it's for sure something Paizo should have clarified a long time ago.

[@CodeKujo]

Certain Strike: "Failure: Your attack deals any damage it would have dealt on a hit, excluding all damage dice." From this, I have concluded that: a) A hit is a successful Strike, even if it does no damage (eg due to resistances) b) Dealing damage via Certain Strike's failure effect is not a hit

[@kenkoopa7903]

I would say, for the cleric to Gorum taking harm while sanctifying as holy, I don't think that's really "being a holy necromancer", since harm can be used to, well, harm living creatures, and it's a safe bet this will be the main usecase for harm there, as a "the best defense is a good offense" tool.

[@pblaveh]

The new versions of the Armor and Weapon Proficiency general feats scale up to expert, by the way. So that heavy armor warpriest feat will probably not see much use since you can get the same effect (minus the bulk-reduction hardly anyone cares for anyway) from a "cheaper" general feat. Cleric seems to be the big winner in the remaster. Warpriest has gotten at least the same amount of improvement as the witch and even cloistered cleric has some fun new things.

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

Ah, useful to know. Especially since a Level 2 feat could be well-spent on getting another Domain Spell...

[@Quetzelkoa]

Thanks for sharing exact text for Fire Ray, Divine Immolation, and Blessed Barrier! All three spell changes are going to be great for my Oracle.

[@zahidanpurnama3027]

Idk why but I find "A remaster miracle" in the thumbnail hilarious I haven't watched the vid, but it's just so funny i had to comment

[@nickthebrick0691]

Divine apex can have its use. You typically only have one apex item, since they cost investment slots. You can now choose between three stats to increase every day. Its especially useful if you know what you are fighting. The barbarian dumped wisdom? Well they can choose to get that +4 against that mindflayer now.

[@pblaveh]

Good luck findeing Mindflayers in Pathfinder :D But jokes aside, you should be able to apply it to companion items, giving Animal Companions a small boost in effectiveness.

[@nickthebrick0691]

​​@@pblavehwell well well, my group is doing a war on mindflayers. Started before baldur's gate 3 came out. I happen to be a barbarian that dumped wisdom too *cough cough* Using this on companions is actually a really good idea, and will be homebrewed in my games.

[@austin80112]

Channel Block feels crazy. I'm very excited to see it in play.

[@Overlegen]

Thank you for this deep dive! I'm so inspired now, going to make a warpriest as my next character! 😁

[@TonganJedi]

Having the Attack trait on Enfeeble makes sense if you're wanting it to be subject to the player's multiple attack penalty. Means you'll want to make any attack rolls BEFORE casting Enfeeble.

[@pblaveh]

The attack trait on enfeeble has already been confirmed to be a mistake by paizo.

[@Aktuvor]

Super video, been loving the remaster series so far, but wont get the books yet as I'm secretly hoping on some BlackFriday discounts that will not happen. This was the topic that interested me most and very happy to see the love for the War Cleric.

[@bryanyoung9966]

Fantastic video. Really helpful going over the major changes. Thanks!

[@Atrianpaul]

one thing that is overlook with the change of the Spell proficiency is that innate spell usually stop at train proficiency and now you can raise it to your max

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

Wait, is there something I'm missing? Currently AoN says: "If your proficiency in spell attack rolls or spell DCs is expert or better, apply that proficiency to your innate spells, too."

[@pblaveh]

@@TheRulesLawyerRPG You're not mssing anything. Innate spells always used your highest spellcasting proficiency, regardless of tradition. I'm just a bit salty that they are still only charisma-based instead of using your highest mental attribute. There's waaaaaay too much charisma synergy in the game and barely anything for int or wisdom.

[@Zagaroth]

@@TheRulesLawyerRPG I think they had assumed that this was limited to proficiencies in the school of the innate spell. That is what I had assumed as well, until I just read it over now.

[@insanocrazedman2667]

I wish the holy unholy thing was either a resistance or bonus damage. So you could have clerics who are hyper offensive but vulnerable and others who are damage resistant tanks but have no extra damage.

[@darkwing3825]

An interesting thing about Void Siphon is the new change the Channel Smite. If you critically hit with the Strike, you automatically critically succeed with the Harm. In that instance, you are adding enemy level damage to all your Channel Smite crits and they get a -1 to Harm and other Fortitude-based saves that can't be reduced in combat.

[@000Dragon50000]

Avatar's Protection is so fucking cool tho. It's YOUR PC getting a second phase of their boss fight lol, instead of a critical hit which might've brought them low and dealt a bunch of debuffs.

[@T.Sheltonimo]

I just wanted to say that the three new clearing conditions spells could be much more powerful in a specific way I read it. They say pick an effect that imposes a condition, not a condition. This means it might remove a greater effect that may impose multiple conditions or other effects. Thinking like the crushing rune’s “effect” which imposes two conditions. Just a thought and it all depends on how you define the “effect imposing a condition” part.

[@mr.cauliflower3536]

Restorative strike would be pretty cool for a fighter-cleric, but I'm not sure if gnome flickmace is not a better option. I've just realised that if you have free archetype champion and cleric are a super cool archetype combo, since you can either be pretty tanky passively, and just shield all the effects, or a h/killing machine, allowing you to gimp the enemy, shift the weapon into a favoured form, and heal yourself AND an ally on a hit. I abso-freaking-luely adore it. And the warpriest could still use the 2 hardness from champion, since it will reduce by a bigger percentage when you channelling block.

[@Chadius]

WARPREIST HYPE!

[@BahadirAcar]

I played as a sparkling targe magus and they can replicate the emblazoned armaments + raise symbol combination with their arcane cascade, iirc.

[@centurosproductions8827]

Note that Zealous Rush doesn't work if you are healing allies or buffing allies as you were going on about. It has to be a spell that only affects *you*. It can't even be Bless, if I'm reading this correctly, even if you are by yourself.

[@Wikrin]

I like that shirt. It's a pleasant color, and you wear it well.

[@megavore97]

Agree

[@TitaniumDragon]

These are not-inconsiderable buffs to one of the strongest character classes in the game; better defensive options and better focus spells are definitely going to be welcome for many clerics, and warpriests are looking quite strong and very sturdy. The holy buff, on the other hand, does make them more consistently useful, as being able to hurt unholy things (not just undead) is definitely a nice addition.

[@raphaelgomes7027]

Emblazon Armament + Raise Symbol + Sturdy Shield on lvl 4~5 can make a serious tank because he can buff all defense stats and the shield can endure more damage (9 points in lvl 4~5 is massive) And if the warpriest has a free archetype to Champion, can have the heavy armor training AND the Shield Divine Ally to endure even more damage

[@Jorph]

"no need to thank me, I did this because I was annoyed" you were so real for this

[@muaadeeb9625]

"I think I over prepared." Gulp, I better get the popcorn.

[@Almighty_Mage]

I’m glad divine font scales. I thought it was bad because I thought it was locked at 4

[@christopherg2347]

9:00 This is already a thing for CC: *Divine Ability* Constitution or Charisma 13:27 "If it is not overwritten, you can take it as pittance." 14:42 Raise Symbol + Emblazon Armaments = Reflexive Shield on Steroids 18:38 It does say _expend_ the Spell. While it will not trigger Spellcasting reaction, you do use the resource. 19:10 "1 Action version" makes the Range clear 19:45 Attack is defined on CRB Page 12: "When a creature tries to harm another creature, it makes a Strike or uses some other attack action." So, "Strikes and other attack actions". 26:26 Yeah, Apex Items are like Fundamental Runes. In fact, Automatic Bonus progression has "Ability Apex" on Level 17. 32:32 Still not clear if the Sustain Attack counts against MAP. 44:09 WTF, they added "Resistance Magic 5"??? Is there any guidelines in the resistance rules how to resolve that? Because even the Bronze Bastion wisely only had Resistance against Spells

[@lordcirth]

"Attempt a spell attack roll" -> MAP. "Repeat the attack" -> Do the same thing, therefore MAP.

[@christopherg2347]

@@lordcirth I have no idea what you are replying too. But Spell Attack rolls do not build MAP. The *Attack* Trait on the spell does.

[@lordcirth]

@@christopherg2347 I was replying to your comment on 32:32, Spiritual Weapon / Spiritual Armament. While I can see your argument, I think RAI is pretty clear here. If they meant the attack from Spiritual Armament to not interact with MAP despite being a pretty standard spell attack, they would have said so.

[@christopherg2347]

@@lordcirth RAW the Sustain does not suffer MAP. And in fact, the Sustain can get around Mirror Images and Sanctuary. "If you use an action with the *attack trait* more than once on the same turn, your attacks after the first take a penalty called a multiple attack penalty." While I agree Attack Trait is RAI, it really should be stated by now.

[@clanpsi]

You should do a video on item DCs and how they need to use the Standard DC Table, while all infused items created by players need to use Class DC.

[@benalias9118]

You know Ronald, your unrealistic and unhealthy goal can wait. Please take some rest (long rest or 1/2 days of downtime as you prefer) so you will be at your best when the remaster will drop !

[@patrickpinder4118]

At some point down the road, can you please add to the docket a comparison between war priest cleric and champion? It seems like they are overlapping with being melee tanky divine warriors. But war priest happens to be a full caster on top of that. So...yea hopefully pazio makes such a comparison easy for you to make with awesome champion feats that define the difference.

[@ChivalrousyWalrusy]

Champion woupd be neat if ir cpuld grant something like inviolable to targets other than itself

[@shokoraider]

Certainly a lot of good changes, but it still hurts that Warpriest doesn't rank up its spell proficiency at 9th, like gishy classes, and still waits until 19th level for master in spell proficiency and weapons.

[@Almighty_Mage]

This turns me away from the war priest

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

Not sure what the other gishy classes you're comparing to, but Magus is definitely more offense inclined than the frontline Cleric which is more a support/defender type. Healing and damage mitigation are very powerful in this game, especially given the action cost of recovering from being downed.

[@xdragoonzero0]

This is why I think they should've given Warpriest Master armor at 19th along with the Master weapon.

[@shokoraider]

@@TheRulesLawyerRPG Magus was one, and then, there's Warden Ranger and Champion. I'll agree to disagree with you.

[@megavore97]

@@shokoraiderRanger and Champion are full martials though, they get zero spell slots

[@elsewhereprince3969]

I once theory-crafted an Iruxi Angelkin cleric of Yikmancha. It would be interesting to explore the character under the new rules.

[@MaurizioBonelli]

Amazing video, as usual thumbs up! 👍 I have a question though - at 30:10 bless spell: there is a long lasting discussion whether the emanation keeps being centered around (aka it is an AURA) or it stays where you have cast it. How do you rule it?

[@eamk887]

It stays with you. I have not heard anyone discuss this, it's always been quite obvious that Bless follows you around, nowhere in the spell's description does it say that the spell somehow stays behind if you move.

[@wayneboucher4883]

Divine apex would have the advantage of not taking up an investment slot

[@TyrBoh]

Awesome Review! No talk about Divine Lance though? Seems like a big change...

[@befuddlerx8670]

Anyone besides me immediately think, "Only have one homie" after someone says, "Holy or unholy"?

[@laki7480]

Bless not getting a heightened variant is sad. I would prefer a heightened bless over heroism every day due to the flavor of bless

[@ashtonsnelgrove2893]

I was disappointed when I heard what "Restorative strike" does because I really want to heal my allies by smacking them

[@ramisthename6193]

very nice shirt

[@josephpurdy8390]

I am hoping Pazio balances the Healing Touch feat with the Blessed One Dedication feat.

[@aventuraenlafogata649]

Channel Smite wording suggests that it now harming and healing hands apply to the damage, when before it didn't.

[@arena_sniper7869]

Hopefully the champion will have better “tank” options in the remaster.

[@T0beyeus]

I am very pleased with the Cleric changes, the Warpriest seems way cooler and the Cloistered Cleric can even use some of the more Warpriest targeted Feats.

[@ThumbAndFingers]

In a way Weapon Surge is nerfed for lower levels cause it’s used to add a weapon die. For Warpriest of Gorum wielding a greatsword that would’ve been d12 instead. Now it’s kind of a worse version of Ki Strike 😢

[@gchristopherklug]

You say you are a content creator! Great. Can you link to those items so I might be able to purchase?

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

Video description?

[@Maxusxavier]

I do still wish we could get a viable warpriest dmg replacement. I miss my viable whip or daggar warpriest builds

[@LordReginaldMeowmont]

The new feats give me hope for the Champion remaster. Especially the Antipaladin.

[@fleic2262]

I think divine apex is for when the apex item that would boost the attribute you want competes with another item you want to keep the effect

[@rgnadeus]

Thank you for the great content :) When and if you get a moment, would you be able to comment on the fact that feats like Bon Mot where not reprinted?

[@williammclyr3330]

I still think that Ironclad from clerics+ is better warpriest but this is definitely much better than it was. I don't understand what paizo designers were thinking when they made subclass that sacrifices main damaging proficiency and don't get anything that cannot be gained from archetypes (only expert in weapons at 7 level but other clerics can get this at higher level)

[@solomani-42]

38:09 wonder why the cleanse spells just didn’t use 4 degrees of success?

[@devcrom3]

Yay! I don't have to slog through Derrik's assholery! The Rules Lawyer coming in clutch!

[@Nairneh]

Really curious how they will whip up the new Draconic Sorcerer and Dragon Instinct Barbarian (also Dragon Disciple).

[@koryhawthren3566]

Loved your content since moving to pf2e after the ogl. I run a warpriest who took medic dedication at lvl 2 w free archetype. At lvl 6 they don't have an option and aren't allowed to choose new dedication yet per raw. Curious how you would navigate this?

[@laki7480]

Mystic beacon is a pure nerfed focus spell. For me, weapon surge is nerfed as it's weaker at lower levels and doesn't do enough to be useful when 3d6 should apply. Weapon surge is a strictly worse ki strike (and sanctified strikes are not too hard to get)

[@MichaelG485]

Doesn't everyone who has the core rulebook subscription have the PDF's now?

[@71jeremiah]

So Player Core 2 will have 8 more classes. Will Paizo do something about the remaining 7 classes, or are they staying the same?

[@salvadorelastname9095]

I've seen that Dreamer's Call was also changed- they're no longer off-guard on a success and you can't command them to stand still, but the daydream is now created in another space within range. Does it still have the incapacitation trait?

[@KOkami03]

I'm at least partially getting this book for Starfinder 2nd edition when it comes out in a year and a half...

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

I love the idea of "lost out of time" characters from Starfinder in PF2, but also the other way around works, too!

[@KOkami03]

@@TheRulesLawyerRPG I imagine a Starfinder character would probably initially think they've stumbled upon a new attraction at Golarion World.

[@lawrencebarfield6424]

Super late to this but does spiritual armament not count as a strike like spiritual weapon used to? I noticed the wording changed and I hope it's a missprint/oversight or something and it still counts as a strike. It sucks for clerics with animal companions if it doesn't count as a strike anymore.

[@AB_And_The_Z]

So on the new Divine Font on Healing Font, it says ¨You can prepare only Heal spells (page 335) in these slots.¨ Do they mean only the ¨Heal¨ spell or all spells that has the ¨Healing¨ Trait?

[@chavesa5]

love pathfinder 2e clerics

[@Real_Sp00ks]

Uh, that description for Daze is very odd?? Was daze changed to inflict flat footed? On the Divine list you posted it now says "cloud a creatures mind to make it Off-Guard or Slow", and daze currently does neither of those things

[@lordcirth]

Sounds like they made Daze useful by making it off-guard on a failure?

[@Real_Sp00ks]

​@@lordcirthunfortunately I had someone check the PDF, this is just flat out incorrect information that somehow made it's way into the pdf. Daze is just as it was before, but instead of dealing spell mod, it deals 1d6. No Off-Guard anywhere to be seen

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

I'm sure it's an error. Just found that Grease is listed both under 1st rank and 3rd primal spells myself

[@lordcirth]

@@Real_Sp00ks ​ @TheRulesLawyerRPG Ouch. That's a lot of typos.

[@Real_Sp00ks]

​@@TheRulesLawyerRPGI really feel like the remaster could have used some more work Really disappointed about daze though. Cantrip damage arguments aside, it really just feels like Daze is never worth taking.

[@nathanstruble2177]

I assumed this ReMaster was going to fully replace the 2E system and so when we were doing some cleaning my wife convinced me to toss my old books out. Is that not the case? Will I need to rebuy those books?

[@Zuginator]

Mystic Armor should work on Armor! It's just Potency Runes!

[@TheRulesLawyerRPG]

It hearkens back to Mage Armor in D&D, where it was what a magic-user who couldn't wear armor did as compensation

[@drathmardarkstar7911]

Man I really want to make a warpriest now

[@rayoman67]

I assume you would choose santification at character creation? If a character is a cleric of nethys they can choose holy or unholy. The book doesn't explicitly tell us to choose Holy or Unholy at character creation. Some character's deity gives them no choice so it makes sense to do it at character creation.

[@phillipkezele7929]

Good looking shirt BTW.

[@mistaree8394]

Good video. Great shirt.

[@vehemetipolygoniae2197]

Are there any new/changed spells of significance on the arcane, occult and primal lists?

[@TheLunarboy4]

Does anyone know what the dream domain spells look like? I love the idea of it, but the spells were... not great beforehand

[@alecchristiaen4856]

I watched too much JJK, cuz you said domain spell, but my brain went "Domain Expansion"

[@TheStompalot]

I was really hoping they would allow a warpriest to take strength as their primary stat. Being capped at 16 strength until lv5 makes the new level 2 heavy armour feat sound less appealing.

[@eamk887]

I mean, it's not that bad, it allows you to start using Half Plate. And at level 5 you can swith to Full Plate (if you want).

[@mr.cauliflower3536]

I think they could have kept the old effect granting protection from sanctified damage.