DETAINED AND CUFFED BY POLICE. NORTHERN AUDITS

[@Jim--Bob]

'You match the description of somebody not committing a crime' .

[@richardpaquette8429]

What are the odds, gray tracksuit and a black hat!

[@aedwards4496]

He could have found some very delicate information on Wayne Couzens at the bottom of those bins

[@TradCatMan]

She claimed to detain him under S1 of PACE because he was looking in bin which is a lawful action, i.e., there was no legal grounds for the search. A lawful action doesn't become an unlawful action just become someone objected to that unlawful action. She has given him grounds for a civil claim, e.g., (a) false imprisonment, and (b) battery. Both of which are crimes. The Police should stop employing people who commit crimes against members of the public.

[@zenex1741]

"Have you got anything on you, that you shouldn't have?" Yeah, handcuffs.

[@YouTuber29911]

😂

[@spookysandwich1355]

best comment ever 🤣

[@aedwards4496]

And those 2 plod acting with total impunity they know that nothing will happen to them personally, what a disgrace

[@Nellyontheland]

​@@aedwards4496 Addresses can be located. She threatened you through the entire illegal stop.

[@howardelder4411]

🤣🤣🤣Classic 👌🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[@LOrealHardly]

"You're NOT under arrest but I'm going to put handcuffs on you" WTAF? SUE, SUE, SUE, there is NO room in the police force for people who operate like that...!

[@robba1234]

I hate ALL asshole police who do this, handcuffs, particularly UK police type, designed to 'force compliance' or torture who they use them on. Their usual excuse is officer safety (BS) in this case

[@David-iy1zt]

The law dosnt work that way Detaining is not arrest There is a lesser standard to detain The biggest problem they would have is no accusation of a crime which means there could be no suspicion someone was the culprit of that non existent crime

[@pete147]

Like many others have said. Sue that bitch of a copper. They had no grounds to cuff you. I hate the police simply because innocent people are treated as criminals. Someone needs serious help from the police but they chose to look for a guy looking into bins. I hope their superiors see this video and they get reprimanded for their actions or better still you send it to their superiors.

[@TradCatMan]

@@robba1234 Any Police Officer who uses this level of force to create compliance has demonstrated that they are unfit for the role, e.g., Wayne Couzins.

[@JamesTampin-jx3ls]

It never ceases to amaze me how corrupt, thick and ignorant some police officers are.

[@barneybiggles]

It doesn’t amaze the majority of people.

[@SteveWillis-c5g]

@@barneybigglesquite right. The more I see of cops in this country the more I despair.

[@NunyaBusinessMK]

Please please please sue them mate and keep us updated

[@NightShooter87]

So that's going to cost £5 of course. In the real World, solicitors cost a fortune, time, energy for what.

[@motman3188]

​​@@NightShooter87you're new to KZbin then. 🙄

[@lenapatrica8750]

@@NightShooter87 Are you stupid, it's no win no fee and this is deffo a win. I'd say 500 after fees easily.

[@stuartchester6899]

@@NunyaBusinessMK I think he would definitely lose if he tried a false arrest claim . No way will he follow it through but his original vid will be doing great for KZbin views ..I haven't t yet seen the night drone show which I like the best

[@stevealden5691]

@@NightShooter87 HNK solicitors, The police always settle out of court and HNK take 40% i think, He should get £500.

[@donmacrae3855]

Before you sue, Report the PC for the section 26 offence they committed, That is a criminal offence and the police are DUTY BOUND to investigate, if they fail, then you sue the police force naming the chief inspector personally for Malfeasance in public office, false imprisonment, Assault, dereliction of Duty! The payout will be tenfold, and Accept no Settlement without the proviso the PC & inspector are sacked for Gross misconduct also meaning they lose their pension. Teach the lesson, EVERY ACTION HAS CONSEQUENCES, AND NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW

[@howardelder4411]

I agree 😳👌🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[@OscarMike-y4t]

Outstanding advice bro.

[@bensmith5231]

Christ you know your stuff. :)

[@donmacrae3855]

@@bensmith5231 It's great in Theory, but they will shut you down, and make things very Awkward, and drawn out, so people get disheartened, and give up. That is their Ace card

[@kevinperry6009]

All sounds so good… if only! However we are dealing with a total simp here who will do nothing in the end, despite all the comments saying he must act.

[@RonSeymour1]

Police guidelines on the use of handcuffs state that the unnecessary use of handcuffs is an assault for which the officer can be prosecuted. If you were not clearly violent, and not likely to escape with two officers there, plus the fact that you would have had to leave your bike behind, then the use of handcuffs was assault. Go into the station and say that you want to press criminal charges against the officer. It may not go past the CPS but it will cause her a whole load of grief and can be part of your damages claim.

[@ped0000]

HEY. Back in line ron. Officer safety overides any ethics, policy or law.!

[@RonSeymour1]

@@jscooke70 Police guidelines are very clear. The officers need to assess the situation. They cannot assume that everyone is going to be violent and a flight risk. Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances, he was not aggressive, was carrying camera equipment, had personal property, i.e. bike and was surrounded by two well-trained officers. If they were able to prejudge every contact then every person would be cuffed. According to the guidelines, the officer risks being charged with assault. Hanxcuffing someone cannot be the default.

[@RonSeymour1]

@@jscooke70 Police guidelines are very clear. The officers need to assess the situation. They cannot assume that everyone is going to be violent and a flight risk. Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances, he was not aggressive, was carrying camera equipment, had personal property, i.e. bike and was surrounded by two well-trained officers. If they were able to prejudge every contact then every person would be cuffed. According to the guidelines, the officer risks being charged with assault. Hanxcuffing someone cannot be the default.

[@pauldevenport28320]

She shouldn’t be searching you ,she is a female

[@NihilisticHedonism]

These cops are a burden to the taxpayer.

[@Dangerous_Brian]

*YOU MATCH THE DESCRIPTION OF SOMEONE WHO HAS NOT COMMITTED A CRIME*

[@otterplays8156]

The male officer should have been the one to search you, double standards, if a male officer went rooting through a females trousers along the crease, he would be sacked and facing sexual assault charges.

[@DMC888]

Good point.

[@otterplays8156]

​@jscooke70 a same sex officer should be used for any search conducted, this includes a pat down. The only exception is if it was a terrorist-esque threat level emergency. And a male officer absolutely would be dismissed for searching inside of a females trousers when a female officer is available on the spot. Even more so with grounds for a search, that would be sexual assault.

[@samoyedpuppy7473]

Any search involving the removal of more than an outer coat, jacket, gloves, headgear or footwear, or any other item concealing identity, may only be made by an officer of the same sex as the person searched and may not be made in the presence of anyone of the opposite sex unless the person being searched specifically requests it.

[@tanyalister]

Please don't let this stressful incident put you off. The injustice and approach of the officers , was despicable to say the least. Your aerial footage incorporating the night shots is by far the best and great to watch. We appreciate your activism. Thank you

[@tc5042]

Totally agree great auditing 👍👍🇬🇧

[@dr_dr]

It's hardly going to put him off as this sort of interaction (especially the ones that lead to a complaint or civil case) is gold to auditors.

[@bobikdylan]

Look on the bright side, mate. This'll pay for some gear and a nice holiday.

[@scruffyalice-ff5pz]

Another sec 26 is her, threating to arrest you if you don't provide your details. Absolute trollies the pair of them.

[@ATwinam]

HNK SOLICITORS would be very interested in this..

[@magpieaudits]

💯% mate, 👍

[@philldownes8685]

yes they would get a nice bonus for themself too..... HNK all the way. they never lose on stuff like this

[@Cj-zj7jf]

Those two coppers were thick and stupid. Why do these muppets not just try and enforce laws instead of wasting time on crap like this. A security guard calls in an incident of someone looking through a bin in public and they come blundering along like it is a crime. Idiots. Sue them for being clueless.

[@templar930]

100% that if i called the cops and said some one has been been through my shed looking for stuff id get a crime ref number and an email weeks later.

[@gregpaul3023]

I am a bin protection officer, we protect confidential information hidden in the rubbish....yeah baby, we are real special coppers. SNORT!

[@deef3430]

How can you escape custody, if not under arrest.

[@gregggiddens]

No crime, put in handcuffs, this is so bad. These tyrants are outta control

[@stuartchester6899]

@@gregggiddens well they have to cuff for their own safety..bloke in a mask .dark ..come on have some sense

[@gregggiddens]

@@stuartchester6899 You can’t put handcuffs on someone unless there’s a crime. They didn’t even ask any questions just straight into the cuffs. So if you wear a mask you’re instantly a criminal? You have human rights in the UK, and these 2 trampled all over them, they messed up big time

[@Mrchipsv2]

​@@gregggiddens who told you they can't use cuffs unless a crime has been committed, they never know a crime was committed you are only ever arrested on suspicion, the crime is determined after the arrest.

[@stuartchester6899]

Go and Ask Auditing Britain ..he's been cuffed plenty of times and so has DJE Media ..it's no big deal..gets the views figures flying up ..They love it ..

[@nigeljones7351]

Let me get this straight... You were stopped, detained, and handcuffed for committing a non-crime? Is that correct?

[@magpieaudits]

YES 🤡🤡s mate 👍

[@petertaylor9384]

OMG I've never ever witnessed such incompetence from the police in my life. Detained for section1 of pace means they have reasonable evidence that you are carrying stolen property or illegal items like drugs or weapons they must tell you what they expect to find and why. They even said you have done nothing illegal but put cuffs on you. Then a female police officer searched you and put her hands down your pants and threated to arrest you for not giving your details. Absolutely everything they did here was wrong! You must file a lawsuit and sue them. That female police officer needs urgent remedial retraining she hasn't a clue.

[@garethwood3474]

Not drugs that's under section 23 misuse of drugs act but knew what you mean

[@princesspiplaysbass]

Why would confidential information be out in a trash can?

[@northernaudits]

One that's publicly accessible too

[@TheSadButMadLad]

Piss poor excuse to abuse NA's rights.

[@DMC888]

It’s a moot point anyway. There’s no crime related to looking at confidential information in bins or any other information. She was clutching at straws hoping he would buy her BS.

[@rolandmasters105]

For future reference you don’t have to give your name and address, even if you want to claim according to AB. Bins should be locked and if a normal member of the public phoned the police when people go through their bins they would be ignored but the police are at the beck and call of big business.

[@tripri612]

Why would you be friendly, give details and tell them where you're going next? They don't deserve any of that.

[@paulmay8169]

So true

[@paulrprichard]

Confidenetial documents should not be dumped in bins, it should get shredded.

[@14percentviking]

Basic GDPR law, and common sense

[@grahammarsh9970]

You shouldn't tell them anything, your right to remain silent

[@paulrprichard]

Cop: see you later. Citize: see you in court.

[@Juvix40522]

What a pair of numpty’s all cops that don’t know the law shouldn’t be on the street 🤦🏽‍♀️💯✊🏾

[@mrr9395]

All coppers that doesn't know basic laws should be sacked

[@TheSadButMadLad]

90% of the public have never met a constable. So according to the WPC's logic every single one of them should be handcuffed anytime they speak with a constable?

[@DMC888]

It would certainly make me feel safer.

[@roymarsh3114]

I am disgusted by the police. Please, stop talking to them. Silence is golden. Shut up!

[@ThunderChunky101]

Stolen items?! Literally impossible. Absolute mental case. This is definitely a lawsuit.

[@germaninsider7890]

”lets not rush„ after she instantly put you in cuffs on HEARSAY WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE OR GROUNDS. Fing pig.

[@Dan-rx5us]

Wow this will be a good payout. Unlawful detainment, no reason for the handcuffs and threatening arrest to make you give your name. What a pair of muppets

[@adrianbrowne7874]

This was a profoundly 'unsettling & unnecessary' scenario, that you found yourself in here! Hopefully the psychological pain from this ordeal will eventually end!

[@TheSadButMadLad]

21:30 Up to this point, she had a vague chance of getting away with her abuse of section 1 and say that she honestly thought NA was going equipped and stolen something. But the moment she says that she will arrest if she doesn't get a name when a section 1 doesn't require ID is the moment she effed up.

[@tc5042]

Totally agree

[@ronniehammond2962]

U gave them your details thats crazy

[@TheWebstaff]

You sort of have too in the UK.

[@markossmith8786]

“There’s no rush” - “we’ll put these handcuffs on you so you don’t get hurt”.

[@MikeKey-y7l]

I bet the search record shows a legit reason for the search, even though they did not have grounds for the search, and could not give you one at the time. If so ensure your solicitor brings up the perjury committed.

[@Bear-yh6cv]

The grand crime of looking in bins, what a joke. Suspected of breaking into bins for private information 😂😂😂😂 They dont make plods like they used to, no conversation just straight into cuffs. Disgusting!! ❤

[@sevenodonata]

You were too nice to that wagon.

[@focuspocus3690]

Scumbags. She went from a threat "If I don't know your name I could have a necessity to arrest you' to "I need to know your name so I can put it on your stop/search". Seriously though NA, I'm gonna send you a fiver so you can get something proper to eat rather than going through the bins.

[@northernaudits]

😜

[@TheWebstaff]

There have been reports of two persons in high viz assulting a member of the public.

[@richardprimett4978]

money in the bank i think its the only way these people will ever learn

[@limitedmark]

Lawsuit.

[@TheSadButMadLad]

21:20 When police do a section 1, they have to say specifically what they are expecting to find. They can't be vague and say anything that might be useful in breaking into a car or house. They have to be specific because they have to have reasonable suspicion before hand as to what they are searching for. Otherwise it's basically stop a random person, say some vague stuff about section 1, and then if something found they can say they acted properly and if nothing found then can say sorry on your way and who gives a shit about your rights.

[@John-d3b]

What a disgrace!

[@pat8ist]

SUE THEM BOTH TO THE HILT...

[@andrewlitow]

Wow. She fucked up.

[@markossmith8786]

“There’s confidential information in these bins” 🤪

[@kaybee2930]

Now they can sod off and arrest someone for a social media post 🙄

[@bluemoose09]

No immediate identification by the officers, no explanation why they’re detaining you, straight in to cuffs, no crime committed, immediately taking the side of security, threat of arrest for not giving your ID. Looks like a ‘slam dunk’ for a claim to me 🤨

[@WeAreThePeople1690]

"Suspected of rooting through bins, which could have confidential information and you could have on you items stolen from a bin." My god! Non crime of the century, even if anything was taken out of a bin. You can't steal rubbish!!

[@hariowen3840]

Cleary a case for HNK or similar.

[@legalactivity6977]

Did you give them your name? She threaten you with arrest if you did not provide your details. You were not arrested just detained for a search you don't have to provide your details. I think that you should brush up on the law if you ever get search again.

[@deef3430]

You didnt need to give name though.

[@martinphilpott5373]

Just when you think you've seen the dumbest cops on video, these two come along. The male cop hardly said a word, whereas she just constantly talked garbage (excuse the pun)

[@sprinkz6187]

Taking Goods from a Wheelie Bin: Is it Illegal? If something has been thrown away, is it illegal to take it? Sometimes, according to the law. Technically it is theft if you take something from a bin or skip, though whether it is illegal depends on the motivation of the person taking it, and whether or not the property has a rightful owner. Back in 2011, an Essex woman admitted handling stolen goods after taking potato waffles, pies, and packets of ham that had been discarded in a bin outside of a Tesco Express store after a power cut had caused large amounts of food to spoil. The woman denied theft, and said she only got one bag of food. She added that many other people took food from the bin. Her defence was that Tesco no longer wanted to sell the food, and rather than let it go to waste, she took it to feed her family. But did she have the right to take it? Tesco said that the contents of the bin belonged to them and that they always strive to reuse or recycle waste wherever possible. What is theft? According to the law, “a person commits theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.” Just because someone throws something away, it doesn’t mean that they don’t own it and if it can be proven that the property had a rightful owner, it would be deemed illegal to take it. But if someone honestly thinks that it’s okay to take something, even if it belongs to someone else, they might not be guilty. Theft has to include an element of dishonesty. Legal precedent If the person who threw away the goods intended to throw them away and wanted to claim no further ownership, this would be classed as abandonment. If goods are abandoned, they legally have no owner and anyone who takes them would not be guilty of theft. In one case in Basildon, a man was charged with theft after he was seen taking bags of clothing from outside a charity shop. The court ruled that even though the clothes had been discarded, they were left there for the charity shop, so they hadn’t been abandoned. Freeganism Freegans forage in bins for food and other items that are thrown away, as a way of demonstrating against consumerism and bringing attention to what they say is a throwaway culture. Food retailers throw away millions of tonnes of food every year, and much of this is still edible.

[@markossmith8786]

You’ve been arrested under suspicion of rooting through some bins.

[@tonymcgowan1317]

Tyranny of the highest order!! 🤬 SUE THEM!! For the sake of us all.

[@TheSadButMadLad]

17:45 If the two coppers had any intelligence they would realise that someone with a body cam and more is not likely to be someone up to no good. Yes, they are some stupid criminal who film their crimes, but they are showing off. How can someone be showing off by bin diving?

[@ChrissyOkeeffe]

Absolute disgrace

[@maccman1900]

Totally unlawful arrest, disgusting behaviour from ill educated and incredibly thick tyrants. Sue the arse off the idiots, treating any one like this is bad enough but my favourite you tuber makes my blood boil!!!!! go get 'em my friend.

[@moonandbacktarot]

This is absolutely outrageous!!! I'm sorry this happened to you

[@vanwilliams4028]

I just became dumber listening to these so called officers. I hope you file complaints and lawsuit.

[@Joff986]

What another pair of plonker coppers. Absolute 🔔ends. Make sure they give you a good payout.

[@John-d3b]

Taking your gloves off to check there’s nothing inside??? Yes love, my fooking fingers!!

[@tc5042]

😂😂😂😂

[@magpieaudits]

These a stolen microwave between my fingers 😂😂😂

[@Cunningliinguist]

Under Section 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) in England and Wales, you are not legally obliged to give your details unless certain conditions apply. Here's a breakdown: 1. When you are stopped under Section 1: Police officers can stop and search you if they have reasonable grounds to suspect you are carrying: Stolen or prohibited items (e.g., weapons, drugs, or tools for crime). During this stop and search, you are not required by law to provide your name, address, or other personal details. 2. When you must give your details: If the police reasonably suspect you have committed, are committing, or are about to commit an offence, they can require your details as part of a criminal investigation. Refusing to provide your details in this scenario could result in your arrest if it is necessary to establish your identity. 3. Other considerations: Police officers conducting the stop and search must follow specific rules: Identify themselves and their police station. Explain the grounds and purpose of the search. Provide a record of the search or details on how to obtain one. If you are unsure, you can calmly ask the officer whether you are legally required to provide your details.

[@TheSadButMadLad]

Never answer the question about having something that you shouldn't or something sharp.

[@magpieaudits]

I do not consent to the search and I won’t answer any questions you ask 🤡🤡s 👍

[@DMC888]

I can’t see why anyone would answer that question, because a) You’re not a child and b) If someone wants to go rooting through my pockets illegally then it’s their problem. It’s no different to a pick pocket. The risk is on them.

[@sevenodonata]

"Yes, I'm HIV positive" - search ends.

[@TheSadButMadLad]

@@DMC888 Many many many times when people refuse to answer questions or give their ID, they always answer the question about having something sharp in their pocket. Doesn't matter if its UK or USA. Its a sign that they have some empathy for another human being. Unlike the police who have none. Its a weird thing. Its like IRA terrorists who commit murder and such like, but they follow the smoking laws and go outside the pub to have a fag. Because they had some empathy for the landlord.

[@markossmith8786]

Bootlicking police, first thing they ask is for “your ethnicity”. 🙄

[@robinwbarrett]

She handcuffs you for her safety? There are two of them and one of you! who needs the protection?

[@user-bg2ig5xc3e]

She obviously doesnt have much faith in her colleague

[@jamesrogan597]

Never explain anything or tell the gestapo what you are doing. Tell them you don't answer questions. And you should of asked where she had parked her BROOMSTICK at.

[@MartensAD]

Confidential info in bins!!!!!!!!!!!! 😱

[@scruffyalice-ff5pz]

What are we all told to do by the Police, when we dispose of our confidential information into the dustbin...??? Shred it up.

[@robinwbarrett]

@@MartensAD what an idiot if it is in the bin it is disgarded rubbish FFS

[@elfinaubrey]

outrageous behaviour, are you ok , great footage as always 👏

[@colinseymour3761]

Male police officer has just witnessed a sexual assault, hope he records this and arrests the perpetrator . If not then it's because he is an accomplice in this crime. Great vid mate please get legal advice.

[@DMC888]

Personally, if anyone is going to be putting their hands down my pants I’d be requesting a female 😅.

[@MG-nm9gt]

When they ask you if you have anything that may harm or hurt them say yes. When they ask you what then say 'brains'.

[@godsgod1677]

Those cops just caused another compensation payout. Your not under arrest but we're putting cuffs on you, I'm not saying you've committed a crime. How dumb, this will be on her criminal record.

[@agentsuperdave2191]

You're*

[@godsgod1677]

@@agentsuperdave2191 Thanks, I know better, I'll keep it tho.

[@PiggyGuru123]

2 more police officers abusing the law for their own egos and lack of knowledge of their own job. Disgrace

[@PiggyGuru123]

@jscooke70 what are you on about you fool

[@Michaels_Angle]

If the company is stupid enough to put 'confidential' in their bins - then that info is no longer confidential

[@Joe-wi9qz]

I can hear the stress in your voice mate, I’m so sorry for you going through this.

[@stevedawg9588]

YOU never met HER before, SHE is the attacker......

[@beckbabej]

Shame on them! This is a travesty

[@seanaidan4577]

“You’re a bit stand offish” should have given her a hug! Disgraceful conduct why would someone dump confidential info in a bin. Power trip!! SUE BIG TIME

[@barneybiggles]

So they cuff you because they don’t know who you are yet after they uncuff you they still don’t know who you are and take their eyes off you while they look at the phone.

[@cliffordnicholls868]

Tell them nothing.

[@Itisfinished.]

How can anyone steal from a bin. It's their property until they put it in the bin otherwise think how many empty cans of beans you still own.

[@hardwatergaming7965]

If someone throws something in the bin it should no longer be legally considered as their property.

[@DMC888]

The trouble with industrial sites is some of that stuff is being picked up by recyclers. However, builders skips are fair game. I love it when people take stuff from my skips. It saves me money.

[@TheWebstaff]

Just bear with me while I arrest you without arresting you. Please sue.

[@tonyshingler104]

You’ll be detained next because a security officer has rang the Police because you broke windows.😂 good video.👏

[@tonyshingler104]

Should say wind mate not windows.

[@sorearm]

Big law action incoming. Plus formal complaints about their conduct. Make sure it goes on their record the corrupt scumbags

[@diceman2914]

Purposely repeating herself and talking slowly so you're in cuffs longer. State of these two officers

[@Rudeboyantics]

I hate sundays but this video cheered me up...thanks!

[@vanessahawkhead6316]

Absolutely disgusting is this what policing has come to

[@ImBaudits]

Yup 👍 😐

[@camrs125]

Should have put the QR code up…she did say we could leave a comment..

[@beardedlady6291]

Yo 😊 Sunday roast with my MIA KZbinr. Looking forward to this one, it's a long one

[@LorrieLogan]

she said, “ you were a bit stand-offish “. So What. Detained.

[@PINACI]

When are these morons going to learn that you can't assault people with handcuffs just because you've never met someone before !!! that's not what handcuffs are for and not what's in the NPCC Guidance on the Use of Handcuffs which you can download from the description of most of my videos by the way.

[@jakebeatstheworld]

It really looked as though you stumbled upon bins that contained serious breaches of GDPR, material which had not been shredded or destroyed. The way those cops reacted, it did not appear "normal", it looked like they were searching you for paper etc. Removing your gloves etc. There have been cases in the past, medical records for example, just tipped in bins. Disposing of printed data is expensive, take a look at "confidential data shredding" on line, it can cost £1000's per week.

[@if3054]

Why can a woman search a man?

[@noddydean9395]

Sue them speak to A.B. he's got a great legal teamb

[@agentsuperdave2191]

Thanksb

[@edyak6280]

Keep us updated on the lawsuit. Kerching…

[@mrr9395]

What about when homeless people are going through bins?