Did We Finally Find A Columbia 300 Ball That I Like?!? Ricochet Pearl Review!

[@BowlingBuckosh]

this is the only ball in our lineup with 500 -> Compound -> Polish. With your rotation the finish is just over-pushing. it doesn't need much surface, just a brush up to knock the gloss a little. other reviewers have seen substantial backend motion. cheers.

[@300x2869]

Did throw the OG. It's a all timer for me. Shot 869 with it in 2004. Already punched the new version up. I'm in love. Getting another and putting 2k on it.

[@LuisNapoles]

That’s awesome to hear! That’s a HUGE set! My high is 856!

[@thomaswegener6594]

I'd like to see you throw 2 handed with a ball drill for 2 handed. I know not being a staffer would mean you would need to get 2 of the ball but having a thumb hole as a 2 hander is like having a weight hole.

[@Chuffdad]

Defiantly get two of each ball two review one handed and two handed drilling. Thank we could get the real review on the ball

[@ripvanrevs]

Weight hole has to be in the right place. Also no thumb pap can be radically different than thumb in. The balls drilled for thumb in give me a very weak 6-7 inch pin to pap when throwing thumb out. Worked great for urethane but terrible for reactive.

[@jbin2756]

E 9:30 very other video out there this ball hooks a ton. Clearly not for the fresh.

[@LuisNapoles]

I’m not shooting this on the fresh

[@jbin2756]

@LuisNapoles wow ball just seems to not fit your release...good to know

[@novinnovations4026]

7:57 This is a terrible argument for not changing the surface of bowling balls in reviews. Out of box surface is already so inconsistent. Theres no reason other than stubbornness or laziness that you wouldn't want to change the surface in reviews. Especially after saying "i think this ball could really benefit from some surface" Edit: would also be another piece of data for your audience, and would be a start at finding something that differentiates your reviews from all the others.

[@michaeljamrozy4299]

Louis, there's actually 500 on this ball with a double polished process

[@millerationbbq]

As I'm a no thumber I do like seeing no thumb reviews to see a more rev dominant roll.

[@joeanderson9267]

Great review... not because of the ball, but explaining why it doesn't match up to your game. The ball would probably be good for a slower speed more revs or probably Sam's Town.

[@ChristopherJBrooks-z4o]

Good morning Luis Napoles

[@dustygerlach7618]

looking good, l have only had 3 columbia balls l really liked, one was the first Urethane in the 80s the Columbia U Dot, then in the 80s the Columbia Cuda and in 2008ish the Momemtum that was a great balls and someone stole off the rack at a tournement l was in. had a great first 3 game round 700, waiting for the second round, came back and the ball was gone..

[@Swamprowdy]

Actually, you should do more surface changes during reviews. I like other reviewers that show the differences between box and surface changes. .Surface is the main component in ball reaction.. If you tell your viewers you don't match up with this ball, and then tell them a surface change might be positive, but don't attempt the change, you're doing them a disservice. I like Luke Rosdahl's reviews because he talks frequently about surface adjustments.

[@Kawboy65]

Don't be so fast to write off a ball because you don't jive with the OOB surface, you might miss out on a real gem. 2000 grit would really wake this ball up.

[@jasonjohnson6403]

When you one hand game is not good enough why not use 2 Luis 😂😂😂

[@KingSimba5]

Mann when we gone get that Origin review man‼️😂

[@BFT031809]

2 handed!! It looks smoother on you

[@pchong312]

All yay no nay

[@michaeljamrozy4299]

I had a 300 and a 295 with the Ricochet 20 yrs ago!

[@Jimboit2]

I had 4 X 300 in 2003 with mine. It got stolen from my car in 2005. I'm getting this for Christmas!

[@cj10211982]

WAITING ON THE S2 REVIEW

[@LuisNapoles]

Coming soon I promise!

[@cj10211982]

@@LuisNapoles OK CUZ U NEVER GAVE ME THE ARTIC VIBE REVIEW. LOL.

[@liquidrock2u]

Hey Luis, can you do a video on the Arctic Vibe? it's a hybrid ball I was considering getting and I'd like to hear your thoughts on it.

[@michaelcampbell5535]

I have a random question.... What do you do with all these bowling balls that you do not like? Or the ones that you do like but know that you will not use them?

[@alonzolemons1355]

I like the 1 hand videos because I bowl 1 handed but you should bowl 2 handed.

[@dmo8921]

I want to see you do a Columbia 300 ball review in Columbia while drinking Columbian coffee on Columbus day

[@wrongfootbowler]

How does it compared to storm virtual energy blackout?

[@LuisNapoles]

This is significantly weaker than

[@wrongfootbowler]

@ Thanks

[@andrewweltlich9065]

I think Columbia made a really odd choice of finishing process for this ball. 500 Siaair/crown factory compound/crown factory polish clearly doesn't result in the proper reaction on lane. I wonder if the more traditional 500/1000/1500/crown factory compound would yield a better result.

[@baruti3405]

Is it fresh oil. May be a burn ball

[@ScottyThompson-lt7wl]

Cool video talk tech bowling ball coulmbia 300 ricochet pearl bowling ball with dot technology drill anywhere technology and dynamic core technology and hk22 technology c in the bowling ball too more strikes and spares hitting power at times Luis napoles

[@tryingtobowlgood]

Send it my way and i will send you a video of me striking with it LOL

[@Kiura_]

Honestly i don't mind the 2handed Luis, i'm more surprised at how it looks like besides the revs going up that even the ball speed went up quite a bit

[@johnzac8710]

Columbia bring back the wicked please

[@kennethmcmillan5120]

Nott really interested in watching 2 handed reviews.

[@Swamprowdy]

I have no desire to see 2 handed reviews.

[@cjhina]

Pls throw more 2 handed I feel like it will help a even higher group of people

[@novinnovations4026]

It wont. It will just confuse people, because he will be using a ball drilled for a thumb bowler with a layout for his one-hand ball roll. It will not be anywhere near a proper representation of what the ball is supposed to be or do