Interesting. I note that Scott's definition of diversity, in so far as it is implied by his talk, is not in any way a reaction to, or connected to, victimhood, oppression or race. Which begs the question as to whether NYT actually watched this given that in the NYT world view the only diversity is either racial or cultural, and that particularly, diversity of thought, as prized by Scott for solving complex problems, is both undesirable and toxic.