Amazing idea To Make Auto pump from deep well, Pressure pump from deep well.

this video will show you how to make free energy water pump from the drum
How to make free energy auto water pump - free energy water pump | free energy pump to water plant free energy water pump (No Ram pump)/ How to make free energy machine
Thank you for watching Sothea innovation, This channel is created for sharing technical solutions and knowledgeable videos that people should learn or awareness.
Please feel free to subscribe to my channel: bit.ly/3r887Nk
Pleashe video with your friends or family
#waterpump
#freeenergygenerator
#watetank
#freeEnergy
#WaterMotor
How to make water Pump
mini water pump
Solar water pump

[@утуб_украл_имена]

Если бы такое было возможно, то в каждом доме был бы вечный двигатель и бесплатное электричество.

[@berga_mote]

J'imagine qu'il y a des pertes de charges qui contraignent à réamorcer périodiquement le système. Au final tu dépenses l'énergie économisée dans ce réamorçage. Dans les pompes bélier aussi, il y a une performance incroyable, mais quand même une dépense d'énergie hydraulique due à la perte d'eau.

[@rajun4448]

not working , simpley waste of money and time . dont try this .

[@ambedkargadepaka5478]

Fake, but you achieved views by cheeting.

[@johnsomerset1510]

It would have been nice to have a view down the well to see the pump.

[@georgios9922]

Calculation of Water Suction in a Closed Container - The container is closed: Atmospheric pressure no longer affects the interior of the container. Calculation of pressure inside the container: - The pressure (P_tank) inside the container is determined by the hydrostatic pressure of the water in the container. - P_tank = ρgh, where: - ρ = 1000 kg/m³ - g = 9.81 m/s² - h = 0.8 meters (height of water in the container) - P_tank = 1000 kg/m³ * 9.81 m/s² * 0.8 m = 7848 Pa Calculation of pressure in the tube: - The pressure (P_tube) in the tube must be less than P_tank to create suction. - For simplicity, we assume that friction losses are negligible and the velocity of the flowing water is constant. - P_tube = P_tank - ρgh, where h = 1.5 meters (length of the tube) - P_tube = 7848 Pa - 1000 kg/m³ * 9.81 m/s² * 1.5 m = -5984 Pa Conclusion: - The P_tube (-5984 Pa) is negative, which means there is a vacuum in the tube. - Therefore, water suction from the system is feasible. Notes: - In this case, suction is solely due to the hydrostatic pressure of the water in the container. - The absence of atmospheric pressure in the container allows for the creation of a vacuum in the tube, reducing the internal pressure and enabling the flow of water. - The velocity of the flowing water and the volume of water suctioned per second can be calculated using the same formulas used previously, replacing Patm with P_tank. Additional observations: - The presence of friction losses in the tube will reduce P_tube and therefore the velocity of the flowing water. - Changing the height of the water in the container will affect P_tank and consequently P_tube. - The temperature of the water can also affect its density and thus the hydrostatic pressure. Overall, water suction in a closed container is feasible, but the velocity of the flowing water and the volume suctioned depend on various factors.

[@georgios9922]

Explanation of Operation of a Pump-less Suction System Operation: In this system, water suction is achieved solely by the hydrostatic pressure exerted by the weight of the water in the container. The pressure at the bottom of the container (P_tank) is greater than the pressure in the tube (P_tube) due to the elevation difference. The pressure difference (ΔP = P_tank - P_tube) pushes the water up the tube, creating flow. Compared to a system with a pump: - Advantages: - Simplicity: No pump is required, reducing cost and complexity. - Reliability: Fewer moving parts, reducing the risk of failure. - Low operating cost: No energy is required for operation. - Disadvantages: - Lower flow rate: The flow rate is limited by hydrostatic pressure, so it may be slow. - Limited lifting height: The maximum elevation difference that can be pumped is limited by hydrostatic pressure. - Dependence on slope: Operation relies on the slope of the terrain, making it unsuitable for horizontal installations. Applications: This system can be useful in situations where simplicity, reliability, and low operating cost are more important than flow rate. - Agriculture: For irrigating fields on slopes with low water demand. - Hydraulic works: For supplying small tanks or reservoirs at low elevations. - Education: For demonstrating principles of hydrostatics and fluid flow. In summary: Implementing a pump-less water suction system is feasible, but requires careful design, considering limitations in flow rate, lifting height, and dependence on slope.

[@johnsomerset1510]

@@georgios9922 Haha. What a load of nonsense! If it were all true, then obviously nobody would bother to buy pumps.

[@georgios9922]

⁠ Key Stages of Illiteracy 1. Primary Illiteracy: This stage is characterized by a complete inability to read and write. Individuals in this stage have not received any basic education or have dropped out of school very early. 2. Functional Illiteracy: At this stage, the individual may have basic reading and writing skills but is unable to use them effectively in everyday life. They can read simple words or phrases but struggle with more complex texts and concepts. 3. Secondary Illiteracy: This stage involves individuals who once had satisfactory reading and writing skills but have lost them due to a lack of practice and use. It often occurs in adults who do not regularly use their skills. 4. Digital Illiteracy: This refers to the inability to use modern technologies, such as computers, the internet, and smartphones. This form of illiteracy is becoming increasingly significant in the digital age.

[@johnsomerset1510]

@@georgios9922 I'm sorry that stating the obvious, has upset you. By the way the internet is full of this sh1t, that just gets 'clicks' to make money. KZbin video: 'This Siphon Works But not for Long' by Land to Mouth shows more garbage that fails to work in reality. So, grow and face facts, chum.

[@СергейАнатольевич-ь8с]

Как много чудесного в окружающем мире! Особенно если не учиться в школе. Количество чудес вырастает неимоверно.

[@SamsulBinMulyono]

Satire bro😂😂

[@prof.edsonsilva5127]

aprendi sobre gravidade indo a escola!

[@Moneyminute.]

@@SamsulBinMulyono what is satire bro , they want slaves from schools

[@satya9711]

Just report this video as misleading... That's the only way to discourage this kind of fake videos

[@XAV41160]

hello, vive youtube et ses video fake ! @++++

[@yannbastiaans]

If this worked, then you could pump up water (for free) into Lake Mead, and generate electricity with the dam in perpetuity. If something looks too good to be true, it is not true 😂

[@wargamerevenge]

FALSO, simplesmentes não funciona, inclusive viola as leis universais, + um esquema para enganar as pessoas. É sempre triste ver um chico esperto a enganar o seu semelhante para ganhar dinheiro com as visualizações.😬😬😬😬😬😬😬😬😬

[@นาคาแลนด์ดินแดนนาคราช]

Lie. I tried following the steps in the video and couldn't actually suck the water out. Waste of money, time, and feelings. I intend to do this project for my child. But it doesn't work at all. Why lie? I ask everyone to help report this video to KZbin so they know it's a scam. I am sure that under the well there is definitely an electric water pump that makes content to trick the worst of the followers.

[@Dingsrud]

It works fine, it is a siphon with a starting barrel. BUT in only works from a high reservoir to a lower output, as any siphon.

[@jfinversiones2411]

Ni siquiera lo voy a intentar, además, que pito toca la botella de refresco???????????????? La primera agua que salió fué por gravedad y la segunda fué porque había una bomba de agua escondida en el supuesto pozo que no estan mostrando

[@atucramaecrim345]

Falsul trebuie pedepsit pentru că altfel unii profită la greu. Acest montaj nu funcționează conform legilor fizicii

[@Женя-р9ф9ю]

Я делал такое из канистры пласмасы сплюскло канистру обман брехня

[@ryanm.mokinson1283]

Fake, very fake.. why cameraman never shot inside the well?? Because there's are pump.. fake.

[@-bl2lu]

Thats impossible.. dont fool people for views...

[@Mahindaize]

What mentality is happening in these guys to show fake and unrealistic videos

[@Андрей45-т6з]

Совершение работы по поднятию воды без затраты энергии. Бред, не бывает, развод. Вечный двигатель.

[@prof.edsonsilva5127]

chamamos isso aqui no brasil de carneiro hidraulico! mas e limitado o seu uso!

[@ДмитрийЛамонов-к6ф]

Сдесь конечно чушь показана, но можно собрать конструкцию которая будет сама качать воду из колодца, используя разницу температур холодной воды в колодце и окружающей среды, но что-бы возникла подъемная сила, способная доставать воду с нескольких метров, надо использовать довольно крупную ёмкость и систему клапанов. Суть в том что если в емкость на жаре впрыскнуть холодную воду, то возникает падение давления, которое и будет всасывать воду из колодца. Скорость будет не ахти, но работать будет.

[@KenSo3u]

@@prof.edsonsilva5127 isso não tem nada a ver com um carneiro! o funcionamento do carneiro respeita as leis da fisica kkkk

[@maykadaharjono496]

Fake video, that kind of pump never work in reality.

[@johannesdec7294]

people has nothing to do but make these fake videos...

[@ipin10kcyh41]

Kenapa gak berani shoot lubang sumur... Takut nya orang yg megangin pompa nya kejebur

[@anilkumarsharma8901]

fake if its work then its become perpetual

[@АлександрЛомаев-ф5э]

лохотрон.учите физику.

[@mbahwowasesochannel9730]

bohong itu ,kalau benar tidak seperti itu

[@junix7099]

why you tube let this kind of scammed contents

[@Vgl12355]

Sometimes you need to fool somebody to earn views. YT loves liars

[@Neue-Werkstatt-BM]

Hübsche Idee, funktioniert nur nicht. Das sieht nur so aus, weil im Schacht eine Pumpe versteckt wurde oder auf andere, geeignete Weise Druck auf die Steigleitung gebracht wurde. Warum gibt es keinen Einblick in den Schacht? Schlimm genug, dass es immer wieder solchen Content gibt, wo die Leute an der Nase herum geführt werden sollen, noch schlimmer, dass es offensichtlich viele gibt, die das auch noch glauben. Tipp an diese Leute: Baut es nach und bildet Euch erst danach Eure Meinung. Das hier hat was vom "Magnetmotor", der genauso wenig funktioniert. Wenn es das Perpetuum Mobile gäbe, hätten es bereits alle. Wach werden...!

[@aguswibowo7]

Why u lie and fool your viewer? U must using waterpump, it was clearly saw when the first water poured into gallon, the water spray was much swifter, and then it became less swift. There must be water faucet and waterpump there.

[@yurko588]

Покажи насос в колодце)

[@zov333]

Иди в школу поучись. А как бензин сливали раньше. только шланг и рот.

[@denshad4378]

@@zov333 ты, я так понимаю, доучился в школе? Попробуй слить бензин с помощью шланга и рта в канистру, которая находится ВЫШЕ бака из которого сливаешь.

[@meintdussel1240]

Dit is oplichterij !! verdiep je hier niet in, sla dit filmpje over.

[@cowru2day]

scam..this does not work...fools day video..

[@H2DiahEn]

hoax

[@Omnomnom-fb6sn]

It does not, and will not work. There's no such thing as a free lunch.

[@diagocz7258]

fake, when water finally flow you can hear pump

[@UBogaJa]

Почему не показали, кто там сидит в колодце? 🤣

[@vladimirtsyruk3552]

И так ясно. Водяной.🤓

[@ProWahyudi]

Does not make sense

[@contcordchanel5640]

hoax content

[@rikoandrikorikoandriko9903]

kelihattan sekali bohong nya

[@jaabc8345]

Perfect. Move output back to well and add turbine. From now world own perpetum mobile. All worlds energy problems are solved. And inventor is????? I wish to earn only 10% of total income for upgrading this useless pump to perpetum mobile.

[@luthfirahman2329]

Di dunia ini tidak ada yang abadi, bahkan untuk sebuah energi. Iya kali bisa mengalir terus-menerus, pasti ada sesuatu dibaliknya.

[@marcelosantoni3688]

dejen de engañar a la gente

[@artmarcial1352]

It's not possible i've already tried. The water source level must be higher than the output just like any siphon

[@christoffelsmit5688]

Sorry to tell you but this is B'S 👎👎

[@thinkclean]

Hoak

[@ivanmoreira2021]

Is false

[@rendipermana4491]

Hoax😂

[@ngodnaps3624]

hahahaha fake.

[@kigenterkusnodirejo763]

Fake

[@dionewillmann8723]

FAKE

[@kampayanjay4305]

fake

[@PLT286]

Lies

[@phongred]

fake

[@rebinho1877]

Public lies

[@user-xp6qg8pq5x]

Fake

[@user_a1b79s2]

Китайцы очередной фуфломицин показывают.

[@user-ps.AlexSk]

Фуфло! Система не рабочая, сам проверял несколько лет назад,! (водолаз в колодце задубел наверно?!)

[@ВладимирМанукян-т1х]

а ты в системе воздух стравил? не зря же вручную наполняли емкость. она вытравила воздух из емкости и труб. чтоб работало должно быть все герметично. вот на хрена там бутылка 1.5л?

[@user-ps.AlexSk]

@@ВладимирМанукян-т1х все я сделал, как положено, система не не рабочая не стройте илюзий о вечном двигателе!

[@АлександрЛомаев-ф5э]

@@user-ps.AlexSk 🤣

[@КультураВязники]

Полный БРЕД!!! Разверни кран в колодец, поставь лопасти с генератором и вырабатывай ещё и энергию!! КЛАСС

[@ishanahmad61]

there must be a pump underneath because to raise the water there's no way that a thin gallon can hold it to the vacuum

[@Dingsrud]

The suction is about 60 cm. The gallen will stand for that, but the whole set up is fake. No siphon can lift any water up, so there is either a pump or air is let in and the tank drains.

[@peterdongon6617]

Yes youre right ,I tuink it is a scam

[@gbatisambire8064]

Moi j'ai expérimenté ce principe. Ça marche très bien. L'eau qui est dans le bidon en coulant cré un vide qui aspire l'eau depuis le puit. Seulement il faut s'assurer que le bidon ne va pas se bomber. De préférence un bidon métallique et fermé hermétiquement pour éviter que l'air entre.

[@kjellg6532]

@@gbatisambire8064 Sorry, but no siphon can lift any water up from a well. Water level in source must be higher than output for a siphon to work. (Sorry for writing in English. I guess Norwegian would be even more difficult)

[@Nana-t4h5y]

​@@kjellg6532사이펀원리 아닙니다. 진공압방식 입니다.사기 아닙니다. 정상작동합니다. 우물이 깊은경우 200리터 드럼통으로 만듭니다.

[@nashliefarmtv8960]

Fake

[@Espartan140]

kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk Que coisa fraudulenta...é uma maquina impossível...tem uma bomba elétrica lá em baixo...

[@xxxl4953]

если напрямую к основной емкости подключить две двухлитровки от кваса очаково напор будет сильнее на 32 процента!

[@nejimakitaro]

意味ありげな透明のペットボトルを取り付けるなど芸が細かいですね。<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="355">5:55</a>に誰かが水道の蛇口をひねったのかな。

[@AlexandreCopas]

Amazing! But sorry... THIS IS FAKE! This is a closed circuit, so the watter allways goes from top to the bottom. why they cutted the video at <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="355">5:55</a>?

[@Mahindaize]

What mentality is happening in these guys to show fake and unrealistic videos

[@healthylifestyle6942]

They dont show the submersible pump underneath the pvc pipe

[@ernxyoung2491]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@Thiagopecho]

❤idufgjf cómo se saca cómo es el señor agarra mucha agua Yo también quiero que no😂😂😢 por qué no me cae mal el agua de mi casa ​@@ernxyoung2491

[@user-g8wjec7tG]

Even if the faucet had a check valve, wouldn't the air pressure sucking it up and the weight of the water balance out somewhere and stop it? A mechanism that converts potential energy into other potential energy. There's no way you can do it infinitely.

[@ahmetdundar1069]

fizik kurallarına aykırı.aşadaki su enerji tüketilmeden yukarı çıkmaz.su devamları aşağı akar o da yerçekimi kuvveti olduğundan.yer çekimi kuvveti tersine ondan daha fazla kuvvetle uygulandığında ancak yukarı gidebilir.kuvvet tükendiğinde suyun akışının durduğunu göreceksiniz.

[@deepakpradhan3705]

If this simple contraption can do this job, why isn’t it fitted every where. Haven’t seen it anywhere. Only on youtube videos

[@sad-ogorodKolomna5pt9mt5v]

Если в школе не учится-весь мир становится волшебным

[@DmitriyBril]

В соответствии с законом Паскаля, жидкость передаёт оказываемое на неё давление во всех направлениях одинаково. В открытых сосудах, атмосферное давление над каждым из них одинаково, значит, и давление жидкости на стенки сосудов будет одинаковым на любом уровне. Даже если один сосуд выше другого, соответственно образовавшееся внутреннее падение давления в верхнем сосуде и затягивает воду из второго сосуда которое внизу, что бы восстановить давление.

[@АндрейЧ-ы3й]

@@DmitriyBril Сказочник.

[@halamankitachannel22]

Ko ga di videoin dalem sumurnya.. Takut ketahuan ya.. Bohongnya

[@alexpereira5357]

Falso!

[@jomonletlora]

Ini adalah Penipuan, kenapa dia tidak berani shooting ke dalam sumur? karena ada orang di dalam sumur yg menggunakan pompa untuk menaikan air.

[@paulneumann2586]

Dudo muchísimo que esto funcione. No crean todo lo que ven en internet. Si desconocen de física, asesórense por alguien que si, y se los pueda explicar. O lean los comentarios. Hay más de uno que abajo lo explica.

[@luiscarrasco2677]

Tiene sentido esto es mentira

[@kutsam-q8g]

если не учить физику - то можно былоб обойтись вообще одним шлангом - соснуть раз и весь колодец вылился через шланг на землю и наверно еще окресные пруды затянул

[@fredyjonas4373]

Hanya untuk konten,,,kasar sekali kebohonganmu

[@lignofreak]

There must be an electric pump. Siphon does not work like that.

[@musikaph614]

it,s not work you put a small pump in the well , don't pull people ,it can be work if the water source is more high than the outtake or more lower than the well

[@TheSacredTempleofLight]

I made this with a very strong polyethylene barrel and it totally collapsed even when I put inside a wooden frame. It never pulled any water up from the well and so was rather disappointed that this was yet another fake video made only to get views.

[@kjellg6532]

This is a siphon. No siphon can lift water. Not even from a 1 inch deep well.

[@ASPIRASI12345]

Betul sekali 😮

[@dorcaskovola2466]

😢😅. So it's a lie lie

[@shahidiqbalkhokhar5688]

You are Right Sir.

[@shahidiqbalkhokhar5688]

​@@kjellg6532you are Right

[@themikir8315]

F A K E ! ! !

[@ELROJO-r5y]

Muy EXAGERADA LA PRECION Salida NO CORRESPONDE A LA ENTRADA

[@agronowicz]

report this video - it's fake

[@georgedan1252]

Fake

[@andryhekhov9963]

Видно же как труба задёргалась при влючении насоса

[@МИКДАНДИ-о1р]

Одно семейство наверное зарабатывает на рекламе фитингов и труб

[@DongNgo-f6g]

Quá lừa đảo. Tôi đã thử làm và thất bại rất nhìu lần. 😂😂😂

[@frimen6419]

такой дичи я еще не видел, зачем так позорится и выставлять себя на смех

[@divbrunzhatsui7071]

hahaha another lies

[@georgios9922]

Explanation of Operation of a Pump-less Suction System Operation: In this system, water suction is achieved solely by the hydrostatic pressure exerted by the weight of the water in the container. The pressure at the bottom of the container (P_tank) is greater than the pressure in the tube (P_tube) due to the elevation difference. The pressure difference (ΔP = P_tank - P_tube) pushes the water up the tube, creating flow. Compared to a system with a pump: - Advantages: - Simplicity: No pump is required, reducing cost and complexity. - Reliability: Fewer moving parts, reducing the risk of failure. - Low operating cost: No energy is required for operation. - Disadvantages: - Lower flow rate: The flow rate is limited by hydrostatic pressure, so it may be slow. - Limited lifting height: The maximum elevation difference that can be pumped is limited by hydrostatic pressure. - Dependence on slope: Operation relies on the slope of the terrain, making it unsuitable for horizontal installations. Applications: This system can be useful in situations where simplicity, reliability, and low operating cost are more important than flow rate. - Agriculture: For irrigating fields on slopes with low water demand. - Hydraulic works: For supplying small tanks or reservoirs at low elevations. - Education: For demonstrating principles of hydrostatics and fluid flow. In summary: Implementing a pump-less water suction system is feasible, but requires careful design, considering limitations in flow rate, lifting height, and dependence on slope.

[@kjellg6532]

But this is no pump! It is a simple siphon and no siphon can lift any water to a higher level. This video is a scam!

[@matteofratini9782]

It cannot work. Physics is physics.

[@Mahindaize]

What mentality is happening in these guys to show fake videos ?

[@kaynaphonesch1059]

Fake?

[@matteofratini9782]

Obviously@@kaynaphonesch1059

[@shurikpro1]

What pipe diameters do you use? What is the depth of the well where the water is taken from?

[@mujtabashah2365]

Basic questions you rised bro

[@PedroPerez80927]

Pipe diameter is 1/2 inch

[@kjellg6532]

Any diameter will do, BU te water level in the well must be higher than the output from the system.

[@ditolopes]

O diâmetro do cano é relação ao diâmetro da bomba 😂😂😂😂😂

[@dgor79]

Хороший бульбулятор, курнуть бы из такого))

[@bertjesklotepino]

free energy? Sorry, impossible

[@bertjesklotepino]

but this is brilliant, i gotta say. I gotta try this out.

[@Dingsrud]

@@bertjesklotepino This is a siphon. No siphon can lift any water up from a well. You are loosing your money!

[@Mahindaize]

What mentality is happening in these guys to show fake and unrealistic videos

[@sugengmampir93]

saya percaya kalau mengarahkan kameranya ke dalam sumur. bullshit guys !!! 😅

[@Алексей-ч7н1к]

интересно кто-то верит в это? 2М просмотров, зачем ? повторить так у себя !?

[@Gwangttaeng]

이게 된다고 믿으면... 바보 아닌가? ㅋㅋ 저 밖에 떨어지는 물을 다시 안으로 넣으면서 수력발전기 만들어놓으면 영구발전도 되겟네...

[@ioanzaman9225]

These clowns have not yet learned that perpetuum mobile does not exist!

[@inhthekhangofficial3000]

Video lừa dối cầu like... phải có nitơ nó mới lên

[@ismaylovtaleh4089]

Baxıf öyrənifdə istfadə edinda..gərək aparıf su matorlarına çoxlu pullar verəsiniz,???

[@lateamgorocket5351]

impossible

[@valmirmanzolidealbuquerque7003]

Duvido que isso ai funcione.....Pura enganação.

[@pastoralessandrogood2712]

Por que não mostrou dentro do poço lá embaixo não tem um guerreiro não isto é suspeito 😅😂😂

[@viociarnau1274]

Minciuni ptr likeuri!