Do NOT Be Fooled by This “Groundbreaking” New Study

[@izzi58439]

i was in the lgbt group for years and god pulled me back to him and gave up all of that nonsense and i am so grateful for it. during that time in my life i was riddled with anxiety and depression and i was cutting myself. i was constantly searching for something greater than myself to give me purpose but i couldn't find it because i was searching in the wrong places. i remember i picked up my bible and i was going to read it so i could point out all the "inconsistencies" and guess what happened. i realized that it was right. i realized that it was the truth and that god is real and jesus is alive and he loves me. i pray every night and every morning and whenever i get anxious or sad i talk to jesus and i feel so much better. i can feel his presence in my life and it is the greatest thing to ever happen to me. praise jesus he is perfect and amazing. he loves you so so much and he wants a relationship with you. you are NEVER too far gone. turn to him. he will love and accept you.

[@SaraShea-qf1gy]

❤

[@SaraShea-qf1gy]

❤

[@christopheespic]

"I was in the lgbt group" What do you mean by that??? This is oddly declared....

[@ChristopherJamesNewton]

This is beautiful! Much love ❤

[@izzi58439]

@@christopheespic i mean when i was young i thought i was gay.

[@adorkychristiandad]

I love your guyses commentary. Not only do you address things in a scientific way but you are very polite about expressing opposition to something and it's just pretty cool that I can certain news stories from a Christian perspective. I've listened on and off to different broadcasts over the past couple of years, it's always nice to hear I should listen weekly really in comparison to some of the garbage I hear on KZbin

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

@@adorkychristiandad Perhaps you should learn some basic Biology along the way.

[@VanyaD]

​@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440biology is consistent with what is discussed here. It's unfortunate that "scientists" are continuously trying to disprove biology, chemistry, genetics and a plethora of other fields by coming up with outrageous theories noone can prove.

[@mhughes1160]

Spontaneously growing an eyeball 👁 does nothing for you if you don’t have a nervous system and brain cells to interpret what the eye sees . So all they would have to all “ evolve “ at the same time , because individually they serve no purpose by themselves

[@katiek.8808]

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440would that be biology that men and women can just become each other? Or do you not mean that biology right now?

[@katiek.8808]

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440you should check out the lander study where half of studies out there are false. And yes a lot are in the realm of biology.

[@KathyBGood]

your program is SO wonderful thank you! my favorite moment 30:00 If only we had a book that told us..LOL.

[@FrankRigsby-tl5zw]

Its such a blessing to have brothers as intelligent as you all are❤

[@jamesnewman8011]

Is it a blessing to have brothers who are this intellectually dishonest as well? Evolution is one of the most heavily supported theories in science. Not only does it actually explain the development of lifeforms over time AND help scientists develop knew methods of treatment in medicine, but it also allows scientists to make predictions about what they will find in the fossil record as well as how some organisms will change to survive new environment factors. Evolution is directly observable. What this guys do is take information from science and twist it to fit the Bible then hand wave anything that clearly indicates they are wrong. The only reason anyone rejects evolution is because they have no idea how evolution works or what it suggests. It pains me to see such intellectually dishonest people denying things that have be instrumental in saving countless lives. If science completely abandoned actual evidence and used only the Bible people who be dying left and right from treatable illnesses while the clergy prayed over them. The Bible is not a science document and taking Genesis literally is in direct conflict with what we observe in the real world. That doesn't mean the whole Bible is wrong, but the creation and Flood are undeniably no accounts of real events.

[@sentinel_nightcrawler]

@@jamesnewman8011 yes

[@shivli6088]

Thank you. Praise and glory for our beautiful GOD JESUS 🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️

[@brunobastos5533]

Did you realize you are sining

[@TJforChrist]

God's word always prevails in the end

[@FirstnameLastname-cx6go]

So.... THIS is what he had planned? What an idiot.

[@katiek.8808]

@@FirstnameLastname-cx6gosays the fool

[@FirstnameLastname-cx6go]

@@katiek.8808 Ooh, childish name-calling. Christians are so mature and enlightened.

[@katiek.8808]

@@FirstnameLastname-cx6go no that’s definitionally being used just as St Paul used it. Someone definitely smarter than you. You can find his arguments in his various letters in the Bible. You know the collection of books you know nothing about except what the establishment funded pop culture atheists tell you.

[@CupofTea3]

​@@FirstnameLastname-cx6goPsalm 14:1☺️

[@joaniemcguire1856]

Praise God from whom all blessings flow. Praise Him all creatures here below. Praise Him above ye heavenly hosts. Praise Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. In Jesus' Name. Amen

[@danielstricker7836]

I grew up in Tulsa, OK, and we had Old Testament/ New Testament electives in my high school in the 70s.

[@williamgreenfield9991]

Electives are great. You have a choice. It's forcing this baloney down the throats of grammar school kids that I have a problem with, like they are trying to do in Oklahoma now. Kids can still pray in school. How could you stop it? It's forced prayer that is now illegal, and that is a good thing.

[@larryspiller6633]

We had the Bible as literature classes in Indiana in the 70's. Was a book most kids could find in the home and almost all were familiar with. Didn't have to believe, but you did have to read and comprehend it to pass. Back then, I didn't know anyone who doubted the existence of God. As like today, just a few different views.

[@olgadimov4069]

I love your show and enjoy listening to you! Keep up the good work and God bless you!

[@harpazohockey2812]

You are awesome! Lots of love from Canada!✝️🇨🇦♥️✝️🥅🏒

[@meccastewart2282]

Thank you! For your ministry!

[@dougraney3127]

"Taking one for the team!" nice! We are grateful!

[@surrenderdaily333]

Just added Zero Compromise to my queue. Will subscribe when I listen to it!

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Amen AIG 🙂🙏✝️🕊️ praying for your strength

[@albanyreadshalleluyahscrip9946]

Thank you most enjoyable

[@RobertA-up9ur]

God bless AIG 🙏✝️ love you guys

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

The god of this world has blinded their eyes. They refused to believe in God and now they have allowed themselves to be deceived. That's what it really boils down to.

[@dece870717]

As it was said by another scientist I listened to, paraphrasing here, "Natural selection is for fine tuning systems, it is not a creative process."

[@sciencerules2825]

It's the combined effects of genetic variations filter by natural selection which is the evolutionary creative process.

[@dece870717]

@@sciencerules2825 And that filtering process limits genetic material, the more fine tuned the system, the less genetic material becomes avaliable. That process ends up deleting/eliminating genetic material, it can not result or create novel DNA material and/or novel structures. So in that sense, it is not the kind of creative process that is necessary for the molecules to man kind of evolution.

[@burnttoast2790]

@@dece870717 You just straight-up ignored that it's the combination of _genetic variation_ acted upon by selective pressures that produces this creative process. That genetic variation from mutations and recombination provides the new material that selective pressures act upon to drive evolution.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@dece870717 Apparently you know nothing about genetics. Known empirically observed natural processes create new DNA sequences and new functionality. See this paper for examples *Evolution of new enzymes by gene duplication and divergence* Seriously, the claim "evolution can't create new genetic information, only lose it" is one of the silliest claims out there because what any one mutation does another reverse mutation can *undo.*

[@globalcoupledances]

@dece870717 - 1/64 of mutations creates new information. Accumulating new information

[@stillraven9415]

They are not trying to prove evil-delusion. They are trying to disprove God.

[@jockyoung4491]

Science can't prove or disprove God. Evolution and God are compatible.

[@stillraven9415]

@@jockyoung4491 nooe! Not even close

[@luis-sophus-8227]

@@jockyoung4491 Not from a philosophical standpoint

[@jockyoung4491]

@@luis-sophus-8227 I'm more interested in science then philosophy. But millions of Christians accept the science of evolution. Ask them.

[@luis-sophus-8227]

@@jockyoung4491 They aren't true christians, they go against the claims of the scriptures, why would I care? Yeah keep begging the question I'm not falling for that. Gbye

[@simonvelasquez9573]

People need god now more than ever I myself am going to church every Sunday and praying more and I feel at peace now when I had anxiety so bad

[@alchemenergyacademy6231]

If you ask a wrong question you can only get a wrong answer.

[@BlackHat-v4j]

This makes no sense

[@kiowakeiffer1]

Great commentary men!

[@tedbriskett2962]

Even Richard Dawkins could not provide one single example of a 'beneficial' mutation, when challenged

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

Citation needed

[@tedbriskett2962]

@@Johnny_Eh-theist Literally loads of clips of it on KZbin. Very, VERY easy for you to find them for yourself 👌

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

@@tedbriskett2962 send a link

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

I doubt that, but I could name several and I'm no evolutionary biologist. Antiobiotic resistance in bacteria, resistance to pesticides in insects and lactase persistance in humans.

[@calebwatkins1212]

No mutations have ever added “new” information. “Beneficial” mutations still don’t add new information, they typically lead to loss of information. Like blind cave fish-a loss of sight. But claiming that this loss of information is “evolution” that can lead to one animal eventually becoming another animal over millions of years is self-contradictory. Losing information does not lead to “bigger, faster, better, stronger.” This leads to an animal that has adapted to a very specific environment, and will never be able to survive outside of that environment. Like a blind fish in a cave. So how does another animal eventually evolve from that animal to become more suited for another environment? It doesn’t because that’s imaginary. Resistant antibiotics, pesticide resistant insects, lactose intolerance, are all examples of loss of information. Sometimes mutations lead to copied information or transferred information, none of which ever lead to “new” information. Adaptions and variations DO NOT equal a common ancestor-that’s a massive leap of faith.

[@rubybaby7320]

The Menace from Earth! It's a short story from a collection of the same name by Robert Heinlein. His imagining of a Moon base located in underground caves. Good fun, good read.

[@YKDATRUTH]

The mental gymnastics is diabolical.

[@tomgunn8004]

Of the evolutionists yes, you are 100% correct!!

[@Tiger1-ir7yy]

Amen AIG 🙏

[@Yipper64]

4:13 there's a sense in which its just our story vs theirs. Except our story is based on historical first hand accounts, with a bit of faith, while their story is based on the scientific method with humanist assumptions.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

Please provide 1 example of first hand evidence in the bible

[@global1007]

Well the Genesis is actually not mostly written by first hand account, since Moses was the one who wrote the first 5 books.

[@deancrossno7443]

​@Johnny_Eh-theist The Gospel according to John, written by the apostle John from his own expirences or the testimony of direct eye witnesses .

[@Yipper64]

@@Johnny_Eh-theist Its hard to narrow it down given most of it is first hand accounts. Several books are Paul's letters written from his perspective, a first hand account. Romans, just to throw one outt. Most importantly the Gospels which you can tell are first hand accounts by the way they are written, and the ways they differ from eachother.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@Yipper64 The gospels were not written during the lives of any of the apostles .

[@mgadams4850]

Thank you guys, really insane hopes in despair.

[@alphabeta1337]

Universe from nothing, life from nonlife and billions of years are major pillars of Evolution theory and have never been observed

[@fifofum5168]

Has your god been observed?

[@Abidingingrace-zf3tr]

​@@fifofum5168 sure has. He came 2000 years ago and appeared to men.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

You've repeatedly been corrected on several components of this asinine assertion. Evolution doesn't deal with either or origin of the universe OR origin of life. .evolution is comprised of 4 major mechanisms. Gene flow, genetic drift, mutation and natural selection. All 4 of these have been observed. To break it down even further. Many creationists mention variation and adaptation....Great. that's fantastic since....... Natural selection is made up of its own 5 mechanisms. Variation, inheritance, selection, time and adaptation..... Looks to me. Like evolution at every stage is well observed....(even by creationists....oops....)

[@Aidan76844]

@@fifofum5168Many mighty acts of God, and of His Son, Jesus Christ, are recorded in the Holy Bible by a multitude of first account eyewitnesses. Charles Darwin was one man who theorized that the universe must have created itself. Astrophysicist Fred Hoyle once said, “The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable to the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein.”

[@DixieDee]

@@fifofum5168 No*, but you're really actually making @alphabeta1337's point. Neither theory can be put under a microscope. Yes, we see cellular similarities, variations within kinds, etc. Therefore, there is no observable way to DIS-prove the theory of evolution. But, there is also no way to DIS-prove the theory of Creation; since we've never actually observed macro evolution and life does appear to be a "design"; and the ultimate fact that you can not DIS-prove the existence of God. So, now what? Evolutionists just won't admit that their "theory" IS a faith-based theory; because then their "tax-funded religion" wouldn't be allowed in the schools. *Technically, He HAS been observed; when He came to this earth 2,000 years ago in the flesh and proved who He was; and eyewitness testimony has been documented, EVEN IN "secular" history.

[@steffanjansenvanvuuren3257]

For something to be ALIVE is the most astonishing/super amazing thing EVER. Life is as astonishing/super amazing as it's GIVER.

[@someguy5438]

In all of human history no explanation for an observed phenomenon has gone from a natural explanation to a supernatural one. Literally millions of observed phenomena have gone from a supernatural explanation to a natural one.

[@csmoviles]

Millions, huh? How about the abiogenesis? Still waiting for that one...which supposed to have started it all. So, no ...we are even further away from the target than ever.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@csmoviles Since we don't know how it happened, it could be either natural or supernatural. So that doesn't fit.

[@FelonyVideos]

The existence of a natural explanation does not negate the supernatural. Example: Millions of generations of some basic bacteria have been cultivated at a university. The most recent generation is genetically the same organism. Evolution hasnt happened. Literally billions/trillions of opportunity for random selection... Nothing. The natural explanation is that it should have evolved into kittens by now. Mathematically, the probability of random mutation leading to improvements versus instant death is something along the probability of 10^-100. In spite of the scientific proof that evolution is a mathematical impossibility, the supernatural explanation stands solidly. Numerous natural phenomena can be simultaneously explained using materialism and intelligent design in a congruent consistent manner. The big bang has at least some basics in physics and thermodynamics, while also being consistent with the divine creation concept.

[@katiek.8808]

Dude evolution has fallen apart as an origin. And I guarantee the type of claims you are talking about were debunked by the church. See atheists think there lineage is reason. When in reality it’s actually the incredibly superstitious theology of Rome. Once called civilized theology now known as secular humanism. It’s sad you don’t know this and will not accept it.

[@someguy5438]

@csmoviles 200 years ago, you would have thought lightning was God's wrath. What are you folks going to do when a living cell is made in a lab? You will docwhat nitxwits always do and move the goalposts.

[@steffanjansenvanvuuren3257]

God bless you all (and me) abundantly, In Jesus wonderful name Amen

[@rosemorris8481]

Interesting. I don't try to prove God's existence, because l totally believe in Him. He's done many good things for me, in my lifetime.

[@prissylovejoy702]

Your comment is intriguing. Can you elaborate on what you meant? You said that you believe in God. Do you mean you believe in a deity or that you have a relationship with Christ? I ask because even the demons believe and tremble at His name. What hit me hard was learning that the word “believe” is not just knowledge it’s a verb requiring action.

[@JustinBurgan-qw1dn]

26:43 They didn't kick out religion.... So true.

[@poliincredible770]

Rejection of scripture is history denial.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

Rejection of scripture is rejection of scripture. Little to do with history.

[@galishuaduki770]

​@@Creationism-is-pseudoscienceWhat evidence disproves the biblical historical account?

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

@@galishuaduki770 You're shifting the burden of proof. It's not on me to disprove silly stories there is no evidence for but a bunch of fairy tale imagination land nonsense. You have a loooooot to corroborate and your only sources are KZbinrs, quacks and scripture.

[@galishuaduki770]

@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience You made the claim thus the burden of proof is on your? What evidence do you bring to support your claim? What silly stories?

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

@@galishuaduki770 No, hahaha. You CLAIM your religious book is history. You back up that claim. Silly stories like 600 year old men building magical boats.

[@zerosteel0123]

AIG punching pretty hard on this one 👊👊👊

[@Gek1177]

Not to people with a high school level education or greater.

[@zerosteel0123]

@@Gek1177 petty. Grow up. Or better yet, provide refutations to the video or take a seat.

[@Gek1177]

@@zerosteel0123 pretty simple, any half way competent person would know that the 4.2 billion year age is an estimate based on whole genome sequencing of hundreds of bacteria and archaea and tracking paralog genes. Unlike as was dishonestly stated by this panel of numpties, this study is not and never was considered the final word on how long ago LUCA would have existed but rather was an exercise in estimating when LUCA could have existed given the parameters of the study. This pannel clearly doesn't know what they are talking about or perhaps they just don't respect the intelligence of their audience.

[@Gek1177]

@@zerosteel0123 not petty if you have even a basic education you'd know that the study they misrepresented look at genes in archaea and bacteria in order to gain an estimate of when LUCA could have existed. Any half way educated person would understand that.

[@Gek1177]

@@zerosteel0123 it's not petty, just a sad fact.

[@stillraven9415]

It holds water like a colostomy bag!

[@prissylovejoy702]

Those things actually do a pretty darn good job if you think about it. Pick another analogy. That one doesn’t work very well.

[@stillraven9415]

@@prissylovejoy702 I was thinking about what the bag hold compared with their theory.

[@prissylovejoy702]

@@stillraven9415 gotcha

[@corrysmith]

God is good!

[@corrysmith]

@@philhart4849 Prove it!

[@corrysmith]

@@philhart4849 Prove it! God is real, and will remain real unless and until someone provides falsifiable evidence to support the claim that God does not exist. DONE!

[@corrysmith]

@@philhart4849 Wrong! The burden of proof lies with anyone making a claim not just the person making a claim you don't agree with. You are making the claim that God does not exist so back it up. Give me facts that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God does not exist. No I haven't committed any fallacy. Everyone who makes a claim has the burden of proof to prove their claim now had you just asked me to prove my claim that would be different but that wasn't what you did. You made a statement that God did not exist. I would thank you for entertaining me but you're not interesting or entertaining you're just an annoying troll.

[@corrysmith]

@@philhart4849 Wrong! I never made the claim that God existed in the first place I made the statement "God is good" and you made the claim that God didn't exist so the burden of proof lies with you. Sunshine. You cannot equally request me to prove Odin does not exist because I never made the claim that Odin did exist. Sunshine. Your ignorance of philosophy, science and proper grammar annoys me. Sunshine.

[@Nah_Bohdi]

As a follower of Jesus, and an Evolutionary Biologist, I literally couldnt possibly care less what organism formed first or when, that has only scientific interest to me. Is that going to be your new god, are you going to turn from Jesus if they find the "living soup"? They felt the same about Darwin...dont be fooled by being fooled, science cant touch KNOWING HIM. 😇

[@FirstnameLastname-cx6go]

"Did they observe this?" Did you observe God creating life?

[@VanyaD]

The comparison is nonsensical. Scientists can observe certain things that happen naturally, and they have observed no evolution whatsoever, only natural selection. However, humans were not around to observe God creating them. God was there and He gave His reliable account of what He did and when and why. Whether you accept His account is not important in the grand scheme of things. It changes nothing.

[@FirstnameLastname-cx6go]

@@VanyaD Right. Scientists can observe things. They have observed evolution. Saying that they haven't doesn't make it so. You cannot observe God creating things. You dont get to say that God was there, because you weren't. You can ONLY say that you read in a copy of a copy of a translation of an old book SAYS that God SAYS He was there. However, as YOU pointed out, humans were not around to observe God creating the world. Sorry, but it's NOT MY PROBLEM that you can't see God creating things in the same way we see evolution. Thats why you are CLAIMING that we havent seem evolution, when we actually have. Why are you lying, and special pleading?

[@jockyoung4491]

@@VanyaD Yes we have observed evolution. Natural selection IS evolution. What did you think evolution was?

[@tzgardner]

The volume is so quiet.

[@KathyBGood]

Yes! I have installed a desktop app called Enhancer for KZbin (trademarked) that is able to increase volume greatly. Big help.

[@mattweeeee]

The book of Job chapter 30 talks about “gaunt cavemen that are deformed from poverty and hunger”. That’s the passage you are needing to confirm what you are looking for. Apparently they ate leaves and roots from broom trees.

[@1987Arby]

Secular Humanists make me laugh. The stories that they try to purport as "scientific" fall flat on their faces all the time. And they'll always try to claim that Creationist Christians are believing in fairytales. "Only a fool believes that there is no God."

[@Harpazo_to_Yeshua]

They're deceivers and relish in their own hypocrisy. They don't care about how silly their "theories" are, so long as God is not involved in those delusions, they will cling to them.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@Harpazo_to_Yeshua Science does not prove or disprove god, so your comment is meaningless. And no, all of the biologists in the world are not stupid or dishonest.

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

You are hilarious. Your dogmatic beliefs prevent you from realising the truth.

[@Harpazo_to_Yeshua]

@@jockyoung4491 Not all biologists believe the delusion of evolution, don't worry, I know. :)

[@Harpazo_to_Yeshua]

@@jockyoung4491 Scientific logic leads the honest people out there to acknowledge that there must be a Creator with Mind, actually. We observe daily that mind (human, for instance) is the only thing that creates order and design. Chaos does not create order or design, so the orderly laws of nature and clear design of the cell, for example, clearly point to the Eternal Mind of God Who created it all. Atheists deludedly believe a "bang" (chaos) somehow mindlessly created the orderly laws of nature and immense design seen all around us. That's backward to actual scientific logic that proves only MIND created order. So yes, science actually does prove God exists. You simply don't like that reality.

[@robinmcbride9499]

I have my speakers up all the way and barely hear you guys.

[@RobertSmith-gx3mi]

Science is a method of trying to understand the natural world. Science is not an exercise in trying to debunk the myths and fables of various religions. Channels like this exist for one reason and that is to defend a supernatural narrative from being questioned or criticized

[@tbccamera1]

Amen

[@Lightbearer616]

I have a question for Answers in Genesis: Do you think you will ever come up with sustainable evidence for anything you want to prove? It took 2 minutes to prove you don't know what you're talking about here. It's a bit of a record, it's usually under 30 seconds, before I discover you're not worth watching.

[@globalcoupledances]

I second that

[@apoliticalobserver2741]

It's much easier for creationists to just yell *NUH-UH!* than it is to actually read the paper and rebut the technical evidence the paper contains.

[@Yipper64]

3:08 what I find interesting is that if that where purely the case then everything would just be slowly deteriorating. Losing genetic information. But clearly that's not exactly the case. Its more like certain genes can become recessive, but dont get entirely deleted.

[@ianmonk6211]

We're dying younger and getting sicker quicker. Yes we see ourselves deteriorating.

[@global1007]

@@ianmonk6211 No, we're not. People before us died younger. When there was no vaccines or medicine, it was common for a mother to have many children died. And it was common for the mother to die during childbirth, because again, complications not being able to handle. When people die nowadays, it is many times because of ill habits, like eating fast food every day, lots of sweets and chips, never exercise.

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@Yipper64 That's not the claim. The claim is that mutations usually are bad or neutral. New mutations rarely create new and improved structures or physiology. A "bad" mutation might have an offsetting benefit that makes it beneficial in particular settings, like sickle cell disease. Fish without eyeballs apparently conserve energy by not forming visual systems in dark cave environments where vision is unnecessary and unhelpful. That's a mutation that led to loss of function with an offsetting benefit..

[@VaxtorT]

​@@global1007Hmmm......then how is it that Keith Richards has out lived Richard Simmons.... 😂 Lol

[@global1007]

@@VaxtorT First of all, I don't know about those guys, but have you ever heard of colon cancer, lung cancer or type 2 diabetes? Those are oFtEn TiMes caused by ill habits.

[@PariahDice]

😂 to hear a creationist complain about science making assumptions is classic... your entire life is completely dedicated to a stack of assumptions that make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside 🎉

[@YKDATRUTH]

Fact's

[@HelenHenninger]

I don't think the idea that we are all sinners accountable to a just and holy God exactly makes people feel 'warm and fuzzy', but we can differ on that

[@PariahDice]

@@HelenHenninger the trope you are referring to conveniently left out the atonement of a blood sacrifice whereby a supposed god sacrificed himself to himself to forgive beings that he supposedly made knowing he did so with errors... make it make sense?

[@HelenHenninger]

@@PariahDice I wasn't actually commenting on whether it makes sense or not, as much as the fact that claiming Christianity makes you feel 'warm and fuzzy' seems a bit bizzarre. I don't think a 'blood sacrifice' as you put it makes anyone feel particularly warm and fuzzy either, especially since you left out the part that accepting Christ requires certain standards of believers, their own comfort not being one of them. You could even go so far as to say it might engender complaceny but I don't think repenting and living to a high standard (at least, ideally, since "go thou and sin no more" was part of the agreement) has a lot to do with warmth or fuzziness. Certain churches and ministers definitely do like to water down the message and make it fairly fluffy, but that representation is not what Christianity is. Certain Christians also conveniently forget the 'sin no more' part, but it is there. Repentance and faith are pretty much in a necessary and sufficient relationship; while Salvation is not 'earned' Jesus didn't take away anyone's self-responsibility and repentance is part of a sincere faith so it is required

[@PariahDice]

@HelenHenninger The notion you seem to have about the pious pontification of your cult fantasy is not the refuge of virtue that you believe that it is... it is make-believe.

[@waynebaker542]

The "Blind Cave Fish" did not lose their eyes. Returning the fish to a river will develop eyes, within one generations perhaps. Clearly the fish retain the genetic info, but epigenetics provides adaptations. Source of information is ICR.

[@YKDATRUTH]

Misrepresenting the information.

[@lonnierandall7882]

I've always thought of space exploration as being similar to building the tower of Babel. It's one of those things we shouldn't be doing, like cloning or splitting atoms or genetic engineering or dabbling in the occult like NASA. Modern science is the evolution of ancient alchemy. NASA in Hebrew means to seduce, beguile, deceive. By the way, who is Apollo? 1Ti 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

[@jockyoung4491]

We explore because we are curious. We are curious because we are human.

[@davidgardner863]

Then why don’t you get rid of your computer, car, and everything in your house that uses electricity or gas and get off the internet. It’s all related technology.

[@williamgreenfield9991]

The word "science" is not in the Bible, so why are you lying?

[@lonnierandall7882]

@@davidgardner863 There is a difference in using matter in it's natural form to invent and altering the building blocks of creation that all matter is made of. If they can do it, they will do it, regardless of whether they should do it. Science has no conscience. As it was in the days of Noah and Lot, so will the coming of the Son of man be. Ge 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. Ge 3:22 ¶ And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever: 23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. Ge 11:4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; Ge 11:5 ¶ And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded. 6 And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. 7 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. 8 So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. 2Co 11:3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

[@lonnierandall7882]

@@williamgreenfield9991 That is a scripture from the KJV, yes, the word science is in the Bible. So why are you ignorant? Science, knowledge and gnosis mean the same thing. The problem is in what you do with that knowledge.

[@lawrencegreen8952]

Answers in Genesis is incapable of providing truth in science or religion.

[@diogenesvii]

Objecting to something isn't refutation... I had hope of seeing smart rebuttals but... this is it? Childish quips and kindergarten combacks?

[@roberttilford7991]

They're trying to avoid the fact that the rate of mutation in the human genome is 100% consistent and says we are a little less than 7,000 years old thus upholding the scriptures 😁

[@christopheespic]

The fact? Thanks for giving me the reference of the scientific article.

[@sciencerules2825]

Nothing in science says anything close to that. You're either deluded or lying, possibly both.

[@InfoArtistJK]

.​ @christopheespic My students used to try to get me to do their work for them. Are you too lazy to do your own research? You want the people that you don't listen to to give you a reference?! "Science" is your God. Why isn't your God the force that created science? Peace

[@katamas832]

Ah yes, rate of mutation. Mutation, a well known consistent process, that we can certainly map into a rate we can extrapolate without taking any vsriables into account

[@globalcoupledances]

Both YEC Robert Carter and Don Batten claim that every generation has 100 mutations. But I made the calculation that it confirms that humans and chimps had a common ancestor 7 million years ago

[@msquiggle3590]

There has never been a bigger hindrance on the progression of humanity than religion.

[@johnglad5]

Is that a joke? Seriously? Most scientific discoveries were made by Christians.

[@katamas832]

Eh... wars are worse. Or greed. Dictatorships.

[@katamas832]

​@@johnglad5In spite of their religion though.

[@johnglad5]

@@katamas832 The God of the Bible instructs us to test all things. You believe things about Christianity that aren't true. I believed in evolution for many decades till many pointed it out how it conflicted with the Bible. I did my due diligence investigation and found evolution to be one of the biggest lies perpetrated on the masses. I invite you to do the same. Join the flock.

[@globalcoupledances]

@johnglad5 - "evolution to be one of the biggest lies" on creationists websites and papers I presume

[@zerosteel0123]

02:50 second fatal blow

[@jockyoung4491]

Fatal to what? They aren't even trying to refute evolution.

[@zerosteel0123]

​@@jockyoung4491what are you talking about? Who isn't trying to refute evolution?

[@jockyoung4491]

@@zerosteel0123 Well, they think they are trying, but they don't understand it enough to know where to begin. No creationist has ever come up with any scientific fact that refutes evolution.

[@zerosteel0123]

@@jockyoung4491 🥱 try harder. Is that the best you have?

[@zerosteel0123]

Try harder jock. 🥱

[@PariahDice]

Carl Sagan wrote those statements about our insignificant place in the cosmos to clarify that the observable universe is immense and to inspire curiosity which you clearly despise.

[@mandisaplaylist]

31:00 Well, it actually says "a giant light to rule the day and a tiny light to rule the night", not "greater" and "lesser". Check the original Hebrew scripture.

[@captivedesk3168]

Where is the hole in the firmament the astronauts used to get to the moon?

[@Amandy217]

What?

[@miso5968]

What is bro waffling about

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@captivedesk3168 You don't understand the Hebrew word in that passage. The Hebrew word refers to the sky. "Firmament" is an English translation that would best be translated as "the expanse of the sky".

[@captivedesk3168]

@@sliglusamelius8578 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth, and the windows of the heavens were opened.

[@ralphreinert]

@@sliglusamelius8578 said "You don't understand the Hebrew word in that passage. The Hebrew word [רָקִ֫יעַ⁠‎] refers to the sky. 'Firmament' is an English translation that would best be translated as 'the expanse of the sky'." Yes, or at least that is my understanding of some of English Bible translations. But do you think the Hebrew writers of Genesis understood (or believed or could even imagine) that the "lights in the firmament of the heavens" were objects much larger than the earth and the "lesser light" and even usually the "greater light"? Of course any misunderstandings held by the early writers of the Torah can be easily explained by human imperfection. As can any other perceived "mistakes" in the Bible.

[@Torby4096]

Funding to go to the moon? You have already built an ark. Even more, one that meets 21st century building codes!

[@The_Zilli]

they got everyone convinced that mutations lead you into becoming X-Men.

[@jockyoung4491]

No scientists would ever think that, but who knows what the uneducated public comes up with.

[@williamgreenfield9991]

No one thinks that, so what are you babbling on about?

[@The_Zilli]

​@@williamgreenfield9991 Yes they do, it's called the "theory of evolution" - if you watched the video and comprehended what they were talking about then you would have gotten the reference. It seems that you either didnt watch the video or don't comprehend what they were saying. They were saying that the general public believes that genetic mutations result in positive changes rather when in fact that they are negative changes. Shall I spell out the comment for you even further or are we done being quick to be triggered?

[@williamgreenfield9991]

@@The_Zilli The theory of evolution is scientific fact, whether you like it or not. And I'm not sure what you mean by "triggered".

[@jockyoung4491]

@@The_Zilli The general public is uneducated. Obviously mutations can be either positive or negative.

[@Wilczek2]

I agree that Neanderthals did not go extinct. They became evolutionists.

[@richardgregory3684]

Well I'm not surprised you'd think that was an insult.

[@AENDT]

Why AIG never invites scientists or experts and instead bets on a panel of clown college absolvents?

[@1987Arby]

These people that AiG hires ARE scientists. They all have degrees in their respective fields. They're not just saying what they are saying because they are Christians, they have scientific background and backing to prove it.

[@VisshanVis]

@@1987Arby Then they need to stay in their respective field of speciality, would you ask a dental technician for advice on open heart surgery ??

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@VisshanVis evolution is hardly open heart surgery. even kids learn it.

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@VisshanVis surgery? Bruh even kids learn about evolution

[@Loading....99.99]

Do you think there are no scientists that believe in the creation?

[@fivefamily5820]

Do you want public school teachers, who have been indoctrinated in Critical Theory, teaching any Bible classes?

[@FirstnameLastname-cx6go]

What?

[@PariahDice]

If we are going to rename headlines and titles how about we name your channel WRONG ANSWERS IN GENESIS 😊

[@PariahDice]

Wait.... your entire argument against trangenders is based upon what they feel to be true, that is EXACTLY your stick.

[@gtechnosinc2518]

The guy in the blue shirt looks huge, how tall is that guy?

[@PariahDice]

😆 the eye has developed individually MANY times... 😅 your arguments for creation are abysmal.

[@stlouisix3]

The Bible is perfectly historical & ashtrays & accurate.

[@captivedesk3168]

This is why all of academia laugh at creationists

[@Amandy217]

Why do they laugh?

[@poliincredible770]

Appeal to authority much?

[@Born_again1984]

Academia is to busy with its ever changing data and chaotic research that leads them to more questions to have time to be laughing at us mere simple minded Christians.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@Born_again1984 That's probably true. Scientific research can be challenging and exciting, and nobody really cares what the religious fundamentalists think.

[@luis-sophus-8227]

Because most of them are freemasons/associate? Yeah no doubt

[@TheresaWenzel-re7ed]

LGBT should mean Lost with out God But Trust nothing but themselves.

[@jockyoung4491]

Most gay people believe in God.

[@fatalisticsandwich7789]

But a ton of lgbt people are religious so….

[@christopherdunn8343]

Garbage in and Garbage out. Oh, I see. You are speaking about the bible.

[@junkiedropouts3186]

Have you read it?

[@christopherdunn8343]

@@junkiedropouts3186 Please define “it”. If you mean the book of fiction called the bible, I have read enough to know that there is some much garbage in there that I felt no need to go further.

[@diogenesvii]

​@christopherdunn8343 resorting to insults and demeaning people honestly just convinces me you're the one with the wrong views. And atheists are supposed to be the pioneers of intellect? Nah... fancy words don't make one wise nor does fluency in banter. Objectively, you're not saying anything... literally nothing, no knowledge or refutation of what's stated in this video, nothing compelling to suggest they are wrong... your attitude however makes them akin to martyrs. It's sad really.

[@christopherdunn8343]

@@diogenesvii Just look at the video. At 4:30 one of the creationists says “garbage in, garbage out”. Is it OK for a creationist to say such things but rude of me to quote him? I believe that the bible is an artefact of man, inspired by a concept that there is a god. But nowhere is there any evidence of or for a god. Gods exist only in the minds of theists who lie to try and protect their belief systems.

[@christhewritingjester3164]

I think we're (everyone, not just Creationists) going to get to the point where they understand that neanderthals were just a different ethnicity. Each ethnicity we have now have differences based on how we adapted to our regions, but we're all human.

[@Jewonastick]

Nope

[@christhewritingjester3164]

@@Jewonastick Yup.

[@Jewonastick]

@@christhewritingjester3164 Neandertals aren't just another human ethnicity. They are on an other branch of our familytree.

[@katamas832]

They are a bit too different to be a different ethnicity. They are very close to us, so much we could mate with them, but there's still a significant difference that you just don't see in ethnicities.

[@christhewritingjester3164]

@@katamas832 Not really. All of the "differences" are evident in ethnicities across the globe. They suffered from a greater instance of these traits, perhaps due to excessive inbreeding, but if they were that different then humans could not breed with them. We can look to the animal kingdom for examples of large differences in physical traits occurring within a kind that don't allow the extremes to breed, but allow adjacent variations to breed.

[@georg7120]

Answers in Genesis is really twisting facts😂.

[@Momonga32]

Neither side is factual

[@StrawHats-n2p]

The bible is literally Story Story Story 😂😂😂

[@nathanielovaughn2145]

"Science alert" ? Pffft. What a poor joke.

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@nathanielovaughn2145 How about you actually make a science point, if you are capable?

[@ArTchN_Ei8ht_Industries]

As mentioned in the beginning of the video, these kinds of articles (the first article) grazes this program almost weekly, and pretty soon, the abundance of these kinds of written evidence will become "standard" if we're not careful to discern which are supported with Biblical Truths. I always hear the comparison of observable science versus historical science and one of the many ways to legitimize an observation that happened in the past is by a written history of that observation. Then following those written resources, the same outcome can be reproduced in the present day. Getting back to the opening of this comment about having an abundance of these articles available as resources in the future, I hope articles that have Biblical world views and Biblical starting points are being written down and compiled as well, where people in the future can easily access in support of the evidence that are present in the Bible. I know that God's Word (The Bible) is sufficient; but the enemy is combating The One Truth with quantity of lies and not the quality of its lies to disprove God, which was evident in The Passion of Christ, where it took many false witnesses to crucify One Truth (Christ). I'm not suggesting a sense of, "If you can't beat them, join them," reaction either because, "Two wrongs don't make a right." All, I'm saying is, just like the Holy Spirit was compared to a mist that can penetrate all nooks and crevices, people in the panel of AIG and organizations like AIG - or AIG groups in general - The Creation Museum and The Ark Encounter need to spread more throughout the world because not all are able to travel outside their neck of the woods; but most should be given the opportunity to experience what, hopefully, most of us have experience when we visited these historical facilities in person. I can still count with two hands the times I visited the Denver Art Museum for free any given Saturday that has been scheduled for Colorado residence, which is where I used to live. I'd like to be able to say the same about The Creation Museum and The Ark Encounter where I have visited both, more than once, several times, some day. Lord, thank you again for AIG and the many things you've provided for us according to Your Will. Stay safe and God bless everyone. Yosh...

[@sciencerules2825]

This guy is being very disingenuous. What has changed is the date for the *earliest known* life. That date has moved back in time for the simple reason we've found new evidence we didn't have before. These guys just don't get that our scientific understanding can change with the introduction of new evidence.

[@Tiger1-ir7yy]

You are disingenuous

[@luis-sophus-8227]

Well yeah, no. You moved the age because you had to, even then 4 billion years is too little for your fantastic scientism to occur, so good luck finding another radiometric dating method in order to push it again to perhaps 3 trillion years who knows

[@GhostScout42]

that's just a comical misunderstanding

[@VisshanVis]

@@luis-sophus-8227 When you go to the doctor do you want them to have the latest medical knowledge or only from 50 years ago???.

[@vikingskuld]

Wow gullible people believing in evolution without the slightest bit of evidence. Made up stories don't cut it.

[@benjaminyoung1716]

Could you guys tackle the science of endogenous retro viruses...I am having difficulty rebutting this idea that because humans and monkeys have over 200 ERV in the same location in DNA they have common ancestors...please help me to understand thus subject better. Thanks

[@burnttoast2790]

The problem is that there _isn't_ a good creationist response to ERVs.

[@globalcoupledances]

Retro virus is based on RNA. That RNA is coding for an enzyme Reverse Transcriptase. That enzyme copies RNA into DNA and inserts that DNA into the gamete of the host as a (pseudo) gene. That way it is copied to the next generation. So if you find two species with that same gene it is evidence of a common ancestor. HIV is an example, but it inserts into the lymphocytes, not inherited by the next generation

[@luish1498]

«please help me to understand thus subject better.» they will lie . BTW they will lie about chromossome fusion

[@globalcoupledances]

My explanation only seen if sorted on "newest first"

[@jockyoung4491]

It's hilarious to watch then read things they clearly don't understand. Obviously mutations can add information. DNA can be increased in many ways

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@jockyoung4491 Do tell. Prove your point. Tell us 5 mutations that created new structures previously not present in any given species. Show your proof too.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@sliglusamelius8578 Mutations don't create "new structures". They slightly modify existing ones. That's evolution.

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@jockyoung4491 That's not going to get you things like flight, now is it? Good grief. What exactly do you claim creates new structures then? Do tell.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@sliglusamelius8578 Millions of small changes create new structures. Bird wings are just arms with feathers. They took millions of years to evolve.

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@jockyoung4491 Hilarious. What good are these slow changes in the beginning? And were they based on mutations or additional DNA being magically added? And why aren't they in the fossil record? And why or how would a wingless creature slowly evolve a wing, which is much more complicated than you would know? You do know that evolution doesn't have a goal in mind, right? How do these important and useful structures form randomly? Randomness doesn't do teleology very well.

[@bernadetterobertson9957]

They took God out of the equation so they have to replace it with something

[@davidgardner863]

No, they just moved him farther back in time. Young earth creationists moved him forward in time.

[@luish1498]

in what equations god shows up?

[@bernadetterobertson9957]

@@luish1498 creation equation. God is created the whole world, he is supreme.

[@burnttoast2790]

@@bernadetterobertson9957 So we can mark that as no equation, then.

[@luish1498]

@@bernadetterobertson9957 if by god you mean easterbunny then i agree with you!

[@temporary4384]

Everything has disproved the bibble and all the other religious fairytles

[@Loading....99.99]

What's a bibble?

[@temporary4384]

@Loading....99.99 a bit like a bible but with an extra b

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@temporary4384 Nothing has disproved creation by God, or the supernatural phenomena described in the NT. Nobody has explained the origin of matter and energy or living things based on spontaneous creation ex nihilio.

[@globalcoupledances]

@sliglusamelius8578 - ever heard of the First Law of Thermodynamiccs?

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@globalcoupledances Yes. The result of that law is that matter and energy are nether created or destroyed. What's your point? This platform is not good for back and forth discussions..

[@archibaldling8621]

🙏🙏🙏

[@surrenderdaily333]

What if you tell the truth, but even though it's 'in love" no one perceives it that way? Because of autism I am more factual than emotional and my facial expressions and voice tone apparently lack any of the softer or finer feelings.

[@ShopharTemple]

What in the world is a gobsmacking?

[@razzlebazzle420]

It's when you slap your own face in surprise.

[@ShopharTemple]

@@razzlebazzle420 hahaha

[@robertc.iredale9769]

You remember that the Ham and his sons were cursed. Our different "races" come from the looks of Noah's sons. Racism was around a long time ago. Probably only a generation or two after Noah's death. Not saying they were annihilated right off point, but it is kinda what it looks like. Just a thought on neanderthals.

[@globalcoupledances]

With Exodus 21 and by identifying Africans as the children of Ham resulted in Christians keeping slaves. Matthew 8: Jesus never condemned slavery

[@robertc.iredale9769]

@@globalcoupledances Exodus chapter 1 talks about serving with rigor under hard bondage. The Lord led them out with a pillar of cloud by day and a pillar of fire at night. And destroyed the armies of Egypt after the Hebrews crossed the sea. If there's a person who needs to serve, okay. When someone is forced to serve, the difference is made clear. Keeping slaves (with hard bondage) is bad. Being a servant, such as a butler, is very honorable.

[@globalcoupledances]

@@robertc.iredale9769 You would expect the Jews rejecting slavery. But God allows slavery. It was the Enlightenment (Rousseau, Montesquieu) that brought abolition. Strange that the Founding Fathers haven't read that

[@robertc.iredale9769]

@@globalcoupledances I feel like you're in favor of slavery. Again, the difference between servitude and slavery is the heart of the one working and the heart of the one he works for. I've been a slave. I've been a butler. I've been homeless and I've lived rent free. What I want you to do is think about how you would treat someone who asks to serve you as well for a year. If you'd be kind, you're not a slave driver, you're an employer.

[@globalcoupledances]

@@robertc.iredale9769 On the contrary: I reject Exodus 21 as unethical. If there is a God then He had sent Rousseau and Montesquieu as prophets who brought abolition.

[@Smyrtleman]

God is and always will be.

[@jsphfalcon]

If they are combating racism, maybe we should ask them if they made any progress?

[@globalcoupledances]

But the Bible is causing racism. Children of Ham are Africans, from Sem Semites (and other Asians?), from Japheth Europeans

[@TickedOffPriest]

Comparing evolutionist gibberish to Brandon is quite appropriate.

[@csmoviles]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@legenefirestone1639]

How about hiring teachers who are trained/educated in creation science and only this one teaches this topic? I would have loved to have filled this position as a retired teacher.

[@sciencerules2825]

Should we hire teachers to teach flat Earth "science" too?

[@justinlong6847]

There is no such thing as creation science.

[@globalcoupledances]

Teaching creation science needs the Art of Deceiving

[@jockyoung4491]

Not in public schools, you're not.

[@luish1498]

How about hiring teachers who are trained/educated in flat earth science and only this one teaches this topic? How about hiring teachers who are trained/educated in stork science and only this one teaches this topic? How about hiring teachers who are trained/educated in evil spirits science and only this one teaches this topic? How about hiring teachers who are trained/educated in easterbunny science and only this one teaches this topic? How about hiring teachers who are trained/educated in tooth fairy science and only this one teaches this topic?

[@Tiger1-ir7yy]

Romans 1:18-22 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools,

[@tbccamera1]

Double standard

[@markjeffries7150]

Tim Chaffey (half Neanderthal / half Nefilim). LOL

[@banzaitnt]

At least state the author of Glass house

[@robertvann7349]

The important truth about mutation is the species never changes, no different than random selection for a fat nose or pointed nose. Still the same species. 🎉🎉🎉

[@katamas832]

Except we have observed speciation

[@goldcountryruss7035]

Obviously, they had heavy brows because they didn't have any sunglasses.

[@abubaca2683]

He actually used "begging the question" correctly. I'm very impressed.

[@ClearWater7.62]

Man really landed on the moon? I think every Christian has an opinion on that.

[@christopheespic]

Facts don't care about opinions....

[@johannesmarais948]

Hi can I please get some clarity about a DNA related situation. If we are descendants from the Adamic time (6000 years ago) when humans were created then after the flood to Noah what are the then human looking people created before Adam? The reason I am asking is that there is said that some of our humans are over 40 000 years old. Are they descendants from the Genesis 6 DNA corruption? What will then happen to their souls at the return of Jesus Christ as they stem from before Adam? In Australia they claim that the Aboriginal people were living for about 40 000 years. Then what about their souls? They look like us, they can create offspring with any person on earth. So yeah can you give me some opinion?

[@globalcoupledances]

Which was Adam? First human? Then Adam had a parent and brother the first chimp. Was Adam the first Hominid? That Adam also had a parent. Lets assume Adam was the first Primate because other Apes and Primate not mentioned in the Bible. The we have the real image of God. Only one question remains: did Jesus also saved all Hominids and Primates?

[@bibleprophecy4400]

The blind fish just proves entropy?! Right? I’m not a scholar but you’ve got to have more faith for evolution than God’s good design!

[@jockyoung4491]

Entropy is involved, yes. But entropy doesn't need to be "proven" since everyone accepts it. Life is not a closed system, so it can evolve against entropy.

[@luis-sophus-8227]

@@jockyoung4491 Well, prove it

[@williamgreenfield9991]

Does the "good design" of which you speak include childhood cancer, flesh eating bacteria, brain worms, or dementia?

[@burnttoast2790]

@@luis-sophus-8227 If you think entropy disproves evolution then you don't now about either. The 2nd law of thermodynamics states that, within a closed system, the amount of usable energy (specifically available to do work) will decreases as time goes on. When the energy is entirely unusable, and thus at a total equilibrium, then you've reached what's often called heat death. The Earth though, is an open system, meaning that it's free to locally _decrease_ entropy.

[@luis-sophus-8227]

@@williamgreenfield9991 Well, you are basically blaming an artist for making a few mistakes in the drawing... If it wasn't for the fact that you're misinterpreting the book you love to ignorantly criticize, get a clue first, thanks