Atheists HATE Admitting This, But It’s Absolutely True

Here’s why atheism is WAY more harmful than people often realize. In this presentation, Ken Ham highlights a number of issues with the secular worldview and emphasizes the importance of a biblical worldview.
Ken's newly updated edition of The Lie is available for purchase here: AnswersInGenes...
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our KZbin channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Martyn Iles, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Dr. Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenes...

[@Darren-r8l]

Well done Mr Ham.You are speaking straight facts.God prosper and bless you.👍

[@Snaxx_23]

For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

[@juliareynolds7970]

Thanks so much for explaining the truth of the book of Genesis in the Bible as our book of beginnings. Helping us understand. God bless you, Brother Ken.

[@frosted1030]

You CAN'T know if this is true. That's the flaw in your reasoning.

[@jamietanksley3113]

​@@frosted1030You apparently believe in Darwin like a God, If Darwin didn't Repent He's in the hell that Jesus Created for satan and the fallen angels

[@dannydejongh9408]

If you need alot off words trying to explain what a book tells you….because if you read it your self you cant understand it…the book is false.

[@chrissonofpear1384]

Why did any angel want to rebel - or ever think they could win...

[@Dominicus13]

@@frosted1030The same is true about many concepts. You see, you test the Bible the same way you test any scientific theory. The more times it works as you test it, the more likely it is to be correct. If you run a science experiment to test your hypothesis and it keeps seeming to be confirmed you start to accept it as reality. Try testing the Bible to look for God. It is the Truth, it doesn’t fail you.

[@gordo191]

Happy and Blessed Sabbath everyone ❤ ❤

[@allanburns7056]

Happy Sabbath

[@jockyoung4491]

Happy every day.

[@markenge9348]

@@gordo191 It IS the Sabbath.

[@TimeIsNow4Jesus]

Happy Sabbath!!

[@gordo191]

@jockyoung4491 no that is breaking the fourth commandment. 6 days you shall work , then the seventh day is the Sabbath. You are told to work 6 days .

[@alvarovecchionacce9672]

Thanks!

[@markenge9348]

I was a fool. If I had a son, I would tell him, "The best way not to be a fool, is to read and believe the Word of God." Then I would tell him, "The surest way to be called a fool, is to admit that you believe the Word of God." "I say again, Let no man think me a fool; if otherwise, yet as a fool receive me, that I may boast myself a little," 2 Corinthians 11:16

[@yourguard4]

Good thing, you don't have a son.

[@CJ-ik8qf]

@@markenge9348 a biology book would be more informative.

[@colonalklink14]

FYI saving repentance is realizing that you are a sinner deserving of God's just punishment in Hell and turn (repent) from whatever you trusted in before, if indeed you trusted in anything; to trusting in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation.

[@artax7664]

I’m going through the comments and I noticed that no one is engaging with even a single troll. That is so awesome. Don’t take the bait! If someone has serious questions we should answer them, but don’t entertain trolls who are just trying to get under your skin for whatever dark pleasure consumes their minds.

[@YouBetterPreach]

You have to give it to Bill Nye. Him coming to the Ark with Ken Ham and all the Christians is like a Christian going to an Atheist convention. It cant be easy.

[@Doty6String]

There aren’t atheist conventions

[@YouBetterPreach]

@@Doty6String Yes, there are. A simple search would show you.

[@2sumu]

21:58 Ken Ham's 'worldview' argument is the best. In other words, he is best know for his 'worldview conflict' thinking.

[@jockyoung4491]

He is best known for insisting that everybody sees it his way.

[@2sumu]

@@jockyoung4491 You are free to reject his worldview.

[@katamas832]

I mean, it is quite telling when his best argument is "well, you start with logic, reason and the scientific method, I start with the Bible, to each their own" 😅

[@rayspeakmon2954]

Why do you care? Why are you here trolling a Christian video if you're so sure of your position?

[@Snaxx_23]

For being so smart Bill Nye is very unreasonable and can't think outside his box. Also he's blinded by the world. Pray for the lost 🙏

[@jehandesains8674]

His box is reality. He accepts only the objective, demonstrable, observable, testable truth, that which is actually real. Ham presents his own imagination and outright lies as if it's the truth. Pray for yourselves, for you are the ones lost.

[@Sammyxxoo]

@@jehandesains8674 Romans‬ ‭1‬:‭19‬-‭25 “since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities - his eternal power and divine nature - have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles. Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshipped and served created things rather than the Creator - who is for ever praised. Amen.” ‭‭‬ ‭‭‬

[@VanyaD]

​@@jehandesains8674But it isn't real. Reality proves Ken Ham is right. Reality proves that if you leave a system without an organizing agent, chaos takes over and destroys everything. Nothing has ever been created by chaos. To say that a system based on information can come into existence out of chaotic nonsense is not reality; it's a delusion. Ken Ham is way more realistic than any Bill Nye could ever be.

[@Alvarxp]

@@jehandesains8674then what do you say to all the proof of the young earth and that evolution isn’t real huh? Maybe you are the true lost one here just yapping online ..

[@williammceuen8831]

​@@Alvarxp Did God create other humanoid beings? Like neanderthal? A species that non African humans share DNA with? Why does the bible not tell of other humanoid species that existed before modern humans did?

[@Jesus_Christ_is_Lord_327]

Well done, Mr. Ham. I will listen to this again. God bless you and your ministry.

[@Doty6String]

Ken is wrong. Scientists absolutely start with evidence. “Naturalism” is built on sound repeatable evidence. Religion and science shouldn’t be at odds.

[@JoseRivera-ov8ib]

can they reapet the bigbang?

[@Doty6String]

certainly not on that scale!

[@LESISMOREx]

@@Doty6Stringhow about on a smaller scale?

[@ericstevens8939]

Praying for hateful selfish blinded deluded politically-motivated atheists! May they become humble discerning Christians like us!

[@sapientbirb7350]

@@ericstevens8939 So humble of you to project your faults and stroke your ego.

[@farmhouseontherock]

His best point, although all that he says should be heard, is those who don’t believe, those who try to argue with you over things they don’t understand, is this…. They are not confident is any belief…. Those of us who know God exist and specially those who ‘know Him personally’ are very confident in what we believe

[@mrastin821]

What I always find interesting is that the "confidence" of a person's beliefs are so often inversely proportional to the evidence supporting those beliefs. "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." (Bertrand Russel).

[@sapientbirb7350]

@@farmhouseontherock Might be a good idea for you to search up the Dunning Kruger Effect.

[@Rachachick]

Wow I’d have to listen this a couple of times!!!

[@Alejandro-vh5ox]

God bless you Ken. I love the work that you do and the passion that you put into it.

[@revv45acp71]

Thank you for the truth!

[@razcann3597]

What a great man Ken Ham. I have learned so much from him.

[@frosted1030]

Are you that slow?

[@Mark-h2s]

Update: okay, I watched the video. Still don't understand the silly title. Can *anybody* tell me what atheists are supposed to hate admitting or whatever?

[@dohope4554]

God is real

[@dohope4554]

and Jesus Christ is God

[@Mark-h2s]

@dohope4554 okay, but what do atheists hate admitting?

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@dohope4554 Do they hate admitting that, or do they just refuse to accept things you can’t prove?

[@dohope4554]

nothing can be proven in life. there's only evidence to suggest what is most likely. and the evidence that Jesus is God is staggering. it's not my problem if you're not willing to face the overwhelming evidence.

[@fabbrofamily7038]

thank you ken ham❣️✝️💙

[@ROCKINWHEELERS]

PEOPLE ARE SO EVASIVE WHEN ASKED DIRECT QUESTIONS AND DO NOT HAVE A DIRECT ANSWEAR AND YET TO ONESELF THEY QUESTION THEIR OWN ANSWEARS.

[@BlackHat-v4j]

Secularism is the opposite of a religion It’s not a religion Google religion Google secularism

[@10sarbear11]

so truthful and amazing. Gods word is final.❤

[@valerieprice1745]

I wish you had sprung Kent Hovind on Bill at the last second. That would have been hilarious, but you did great, Ken.

[@frosted1030]

Hovind still thinks he can "identify" as a PhD, beat his wife and rolled on her during his criminal trial, and oh yes.. does not have any track record in science or even a transcript from any college (even the diploma mill he paid for a fake degree) saying that he took and passed a single course related to science. What's worse.. he talks and pretends he has something to say about science.

[@Biblical.Grace7]

❤ Praise the Lord for His perfect word!

[@palladin1337]

...Even though it can't even remain internally consistent, which is something to be expected when multiple people are just writing down their beliefs over several generations but very baffling if it's supposed to all come from the same 'divine source.' You'd think god would get his message right and keep it consistent, or would at least take the stance of a more developed and conscientious society instead of simply reflecting the kinds of beliefs and practices common in our distant past. Remind me again how condemning an entire ethnic group to death because they happen to live in the 'wrong' place is a good thing to do.

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

Karl Marx said communism begins where atheism begins.

[@jockyoung4491]

And the rest of the sentence was that atheism is far from communism.

[@luish1498]

”Communism begins from the outset with atheism; but atheism is, at first, far from being communism; indeed, that atheism is still mostly an abstraction” karl marx The quote is from Private Property and Communism. In fact, there’s no real relationship between being an atheist (a nonbeliever) and being a communist as the vast majority of atheists aren’t (and never will be) communists.

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

@luish1498 Atheist, no God, I make the rules. In Russia, China, any nation that was taken over by communism was no were near more than 1/4 atheist.

[@HS-zk5nn]

interestingly those that came up with the primordial soup were... you guessed it his followers.

[@Jack-v7m5t]

​@@luish1498Yes. But Communism completely leaves all things beyond this earth, and therefore outlaws all religions.

[@bufordghoons9981]

"Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God. But exhort one another daily, while it is called Today; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin." --Hebrews 3:12 Sin is the root cause of atheism, so rather than "fight" atheism, exhort Christians per 2 Corinthians 13:5 “Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?” Atheist = reprobate. The solution is not so much arguing against their "science, so-called" but preach to them the Gospel which most have rejected repeatedly.

[@jockyoung4491]

People disagree. Deal with it.

[@HS-zk5nn]

yes it is also the weakest worldview. it doesnt answer anything. and just says nuh-uh to evidence

[@rayspeakmon2954]

​​@@jockyoung4491We're all trying to deal with the irrationality of Internet atheist trolls watching Christian videos and then making comments. What do you hope to accomplish with your comment? The question is rhetorical. You won't answer it anyway.

[@jbunch3331]

Saved by faith not works but you are judged and rewarded based on your work.

[@frosted1030]

"Saved by faith not works but you are judged and rewarded based on your work." What's your P value on that? Ever measured or are you just taking someone's word?

[@KelliAnnWinkler]

I don't consider myself a religious person. College provided me the opportunity to become well educated in the sciences and engineering. Bill Nye would probably be last person I would want advising my children.

[@JesusSportsNature]

Thank you Mr Ham.

[@JoeDirt-v3b]

3:23 I definitely respect Bill Nye for that statement. Telling her to look around at the world and make her own judgements. I'm a follower of Christ myself and I'd definitely encourage people to listen to their hearts seeking truth unrelentingly.

[@richardgregory3684]

Truth is generally found in facts and reason - not going with whatever your emotions say.

[@JoeDirt-v3b]

@richardgregory3684 Well, I'd say there are statements made in the Bible that have since been verified by people in much more recent history. So, for me, at least it's not just going with whichever way my emotions might blow.

[@honestabe4768]

Gen 6:5, Mat 15:19 Be careful, brother. The heart is wicked and emotional.

[@richardgregory3684]

@@honestabe4768 Ironic then that the whole bible is an appeal to feelings and not reason.

[@ck8191]

Yes, the heart is deceitful but I will say there is an inate longing within each person to be in communion with the Creator.

[@Mark-h2s]

'Atheists are gonna hate this video' Here we go again with the goofy titles:-) Actually, they probably find the titles very amusing and ridiculous, and I really, really doubt they are going to 'hate' this video... At least not for the reasons you think.

[@jimschlaegel8454]

Way too much video compression again. I got through about half, and it was giving me a headache, with the technical compression annoyance overshadowing the good message being presented.

[@DeanS.F.S.K.]

👏👏👏👍🎯

[@finneyelectrical]

Close your eyes 👀

[@craigarcher469]

After watching this I have all the more respect for Bill Nye.

[@fabbrofamily7038]

all bill nye did is interupt everyone, the ego pride of life was disturbing.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

That reminds me. In their debate Ken Ham literally admitted no evidence could convince him. He doesn't care about evidence.

[@SuperCilis]

​@Creationism-is-pseudoscience that was bills quote actually. He denied evidence and continues to prop up pseudoscience

[@luish1498]

@@SuperCilis ken ham denies any evidence that makes him wrong

[@frosted1030]

"all bill nye did is interupt everyone, the ego pride of life was disturbing." Funny.. Ham did street interviews with uninformed college students and berated them to follow his beLIEfs rather than discovering the truth.. the egotism here is contrastable. Nye doesn't target children with lies.

[@SuperCilis]

@@luish1498 ok...

[@spencerpugh7855]

Using a child to back up your dogmatism. Religion separates people, why don't we find things that unite us.

[@inreachent.4981]

Earth is FLAT TOO

[@WayneDaGoat]

0 brain cells

[@Sigma-Epsilon]

Glory to GOD! I love the LORD and the way he is using you and your teammates in HIS work.

[@ginapena6878]

" science" is always changing. God never changes. Scientist cant even agree on the same interpretations, results, etc.

[@luish1498]

«" science" is always changing.« and is that a good thing or would you rather doctors practice medical procedures from the 1500's? «God never changes. « and thats why we still have people that think earth is flat. «Scientist cant even agree on the same interpretations, results, etc« it's normal for scientists to debate interpretations and results, this discourse ultimately contributes to a more nuanced understanding of complex issues.

[@ginapena6878]

@luish1498 I agree with your first comment. I'm thinking more on an evolution standpoint. Especially when they can't agree how many years certain things happened when they all are given the same info. As for the second comment, I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. I don't think all believers of God and creation believe in flat earth.

[@luish1498]

@@ginapena6878 «how many years certain things happened when they all are given the same info.» «evolution standpoint.« sorry i dont understand what do you mean with this? are you refering to the «millions of years that evolutionists believe»? ««God never changes. «« according to flat earthers the bible/gods word states that earth is flat, there is a dome/firmament so space is fake etc. «I don't think all believers of God and creation believe in flat earth.» if that is true that means , according to FE's , you are not a true believer. you have even people in this channel ( ken ham and aigs) telling to the «leaders» of the channel to stop spreading satan lies ( that earth is a globe and space is real , i think you can find those tipes of comments in that video where they talk about james web space telescopy).

[@katamas832]

"Scientists cant even agree on the same interpretations..." is *extremely rich* coming from a Christian with thousands of denominations for their religion lol.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@ginapena6878 There are uncertaintyies about the details of evolution, of course, because we don't have enough information for some things. But there is no question about the fact that life evolved over billions of years. That is obvious from the evidence, and it is never going to change.

[@FBIforreal152]

I loved the Ark exhibit. So cool.

[@Iowrider714]

He lost me when he said "you can't show the earth is not 6,000 yrs old". Give me one reasonable answer as to how fossils of ocean living trilobites got a thousand feet up in the alps that makes more sense than the movement of tectonic plates caused India to break away from Africa and crash into Asia and things that used the be on the ocean floor for millions of yrs eventually ended up on top of the highest mountains on earth in less than 6K yrs. You can't. I had a friend who told me they got carbon dating all wrong and the fossils of dinosaurs were only a couple thousand yrs old. Really? Or how about your look out into space and see billions and billions of galaxies with trillions and trillions of stars that must have almost an almost infinite numbers of planets and think there's no where else in the universe that life could have possibly evolved besides our insignificant little rock in a totally insignificant solar system of a totally random galaxy. Sorry, it takes more faith than I can muster to believe any of the Bible stories or anything to do with any religion. That's all you have is faith, you have no scientific facts or proof other than you "believe".

[@tabathatyler9511]

Thank you for this, I have saved to use to share God's Word.

[@mabus999]

This creationist putting his arm around this little girl and boldface lying to her is obscene! Predatory behavior!

[@HenryDalcke]

Even if phenotypic similarity would point to Evolution, nobody could distinguish fossil cryptic species from species that allegedly evolved from one another. So, there are two explanations for the same observable data. Which one is true?

[@jehandesains8674]

Well, evolution has all the evidence to support it, while creation does not. Even without fossils, Evolution is proven by other means, while creation has no evidence at all.

[@CJ-ik8qf]

Try asking a scientist instead of a preacher

[@debralynnpaxton5238]

How can Anyone separate Nature, Science, Math, etc., from The LORD GOD who created all things? ✝️ ❤❤❤ He IS the brilliance behind the cosmos, nature, mathematics, languages, every precious life, whether human, animal, insect, etc.., etc., etc.. ❤❤❤

[@luish1498]

How can Anyone separate Nature, Science, Math, etc., from EasterBunny who created all things?

[@reformCopyright]

Can you prove that? *No, you can't.*

[@jockyoung4491]

They do so by believing something different. People do that, you know.

[@AlethicAvenger]

1) the speaker equates secularism or a lack of belief in a specific deity with a "religion." this is a mischaracterization. secularism is the separation of church and state and does not constitute a unified belief system. atheism is the lack of belief in God(s), not a religion with doctrines and rituals. while secular viewpoints are prevalent in many institutions, they are not a "religion" in the traditional sense. 2) atheists, like people of any belief system (or lack thereof), can hold diverse moral and ethical views. there is no single "atheist morality." the speaker's claim that atheists cannot have consistent moral frameworks is simply incorrect. 3) "God's word and man's word" frames the discussion as a conflict between religious belief and secular thought, which is a simplification. many people hold nuanced views that don't fit neatly into these two categories. science, for example, is not inherently opposed to religion; many scientists are religious. the speaker's dichotomy is a false one. 4) scientists use various radiometric dating methods, geological strata analysis, and other techniques to determine the age of the Earth, which is estimated to be around 4.54 billion years old. these methods are based on well-established scientific principles and provide consistent results. the speaker's dismissal of these methods is unfounded. 5) the speaker attempts to equate forensic science (which deals with evidence in the present) with historical science (which studies past events) to cast doubt on evolutionary biology. while both involve interpretation of evidence, they operate on different timescales and use different methodologies. evolutionary biology relies on multiple lines of evidence, including fossils, comparative anatomy, genetics, and biogeography, to reconstruct the history of life on Earth. forensic science deals with much more recent events. the speaker's comparison is misleading. 6) while it's true that everyone has biases, the scientific method is designed to minimize the influence of personal beliefs on the interpretation of data. scientists use rigorous testing, peer review, and replication to ensure objectivity. the speaker's assertion that scientists simply interpret evidence according to their pre-existing beliefs ignores the self-correcting nature of science. 7) atheism is specifically the lack of belief in God(s). while atheists may hold other beliefs (like naturalism, as the speaker suggests), atheism itself is not a positive assertion of a belief system but rather the absence of a particular belief. 8) the speaker presents a caricature of evolutionary theory, claiming that it suggests "one kind supposedly changed into another ape-like creatures into people." evolutionary theory describes gradual changes in populations over generations through natural selection and other mechanisms. it does not claim that one individual suddenly transforms into another species. the speaker's description is inaccurate and misleading. 9) the speaker contends that atheists cannot make moral judgments because they lack a divine moral authority. this is a common misconception. morality can be based on various secular principles, such as empathy, reason, and social contracts. atheists can and do make moral judgments based on these principles. 10) "Creationists and evolutionists actually have all the same facts" is misleading. while both sides may observe the same natural phenomena, they interpret those facts within different theoretical frameworks. the interpretation of evidence is where the disagreement lies, not in the facts themselves. 11) the speaker asserts that the Bible is a book of history that provides a foundation for understanding the world. while the Bible contains historical narratives, it is primarily a religious text with theological and moral teachings. its historical accuracy is a matter of debate, and many of its accounts are not supported by independent historical or archaeological evidence.

[@itslikethis1830]

Atheist and Christians have the conscience , with out we wouldn't have the capacity to distinguish of good or wrong because we would have no idea in the first place of what is good or wrong. With the conscience , its not about what choice you have , its rather to follow the right path which the good and avoiding the bad. However the conscience is susceptible to Sin which can alter the way of what we call good and bad. Christians have the holy spirit which is the mediator between Man and God through Christ . As humans we make mistakes , we sin that's why with The holy spirit I'm able to recognize the wrong , you could say that conscience can do that as well but what about people who deliberately murder, steal , rape, etc with no remorse. there's nothing in them to tell that there doing evil things. Conscience is susceptible to corruption which comes from sin . The Holy spirit comes from God so it means it cant be corrupted. What about Christians who already know the Gospel and deliberately commit sin , that's different . In this case people who know the truth and decide to sin or abandon the God are called Apostate. They go for evil not because they don't know , its because they personally chose it. Karl Marx said: "It is not consciousness that determines life, but life that determines consciousness". If this were true , life would've been long gone by now. Life would be chaotic violent because everyone would have their own way of having a conscience . There has to be an order and rules that runs our conscience and that only come from one and that one is God. This means that what God has placed on our conscience is what determines life based on our actions which good and evil.

[@burnttoast2790]

@@itslikethis1830 *Atheist and Christians have the conscience , with out we wouldn't have the capacity to distinguish of good or wrong because we would have no idea in the first place of what is good or wrong.* Nope. One's conscience is, essentially, one's awareness of their value judgements (the basis for literally anyone's morals), as well as the application of those values onto themselves. It's a consequence of self-awareness in application, not something granted to us by an external entity like you might imagine. *However the conscience is susceptible to Sin which can alter the way of what we call good and bad.* Or, in _reality,_ what people consider good and bad varies, based on their upbringing and personal experiences. You've simply decided to claim that anyone who doesn't make the same value judgements as you must be corrupted by something. *Christians have the holy spirit which is the mediator between Man and God through Christ.* So the third part to your trio of "totally not separate gods." *As humans we make mistakes, we sin that's why with The holy spirit I'm able to recognize the wrong , you could say that conscience can do that as well but what about people who deliberately murder, steal , rape, etc with no remorse. there's nothing in them to tell that there doing evil things.* If you actually look into the sorts of people who do such things without remorse in unambiguous situations, it's always them, for whatever reason, thinking that what they did _isn't_ wrong. Like I said, all of us have our subjective lived experiences that inform our value judgements. *Conscience is susceptible to corruption which comes from sin The Holy spirit comes from God so it means it cant be corrupted.* Except when God himself isn't as infallible as you'd claim. Remember, your God is A-OK with slavery, genocide, and plenty of other crimes against humanity. *What about Christians who already know the Gospel and deliberately commit sin, that's different. In this case people who know the truth and decide to sin or abandon the God are called Apostate. They go for evil not because they don't know, its because they personally chose it.* _That_ would be a direct consequence of your religion's most basic doctrine. All people are born sinners, and yet anyone may be forgiven if they but believe. It's an excuse to avoid responsibility for one's actions, since you can just say a few "hail Mary"s and get off scot-free. *Karl Marx said: "It is not consciousness that determines life, but life that determines consciousness". If this were true, life would've been long gone by now. Life would be chaotic violent because everyone would have their own way of having a conscience.* Odd then that we still have societies, right? But if you actually look, you'd see that societies and the people that make them up are under awhat can be described as an evolutionary pressure. Those societies who enforce behavior with a net-positive for the maintenance of that society are more likely to prosper than those that don't. This even works at the smaller scale too, hence why we as a species tend to punish, ostracize, exile, or kill those who harm the group at large, even if it's as small as a family. *There has to be an order and rules that runs our conscience and that only come from one and that one is God.* More accurately, social species are under a direct evolutionary pressure to behave in ways that support the group, and the larger and more complex the group dynamics the more intricate these rules become. We as humans simply take this to its logical conclusion, as a society with enforced laws. *This means that what God has placed on our conscience is what determines life based on our actions which good and evil.* Then why is it that most people in the West, even Christians, view slavery as an abominable practice? God is perfectly fine with it in the Bible, so did he change his mind since then? Did he rewrite what's put on our hearts?

[@gregoryt8792]

The archaeological evidence is overwhelming! Almost every city mentioned in the Old Testament has been found and every city mentioned in the New Testament has been found. No piece of the 100,000 or more archaeological artifacts contradicts the Bible. In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert, proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. No other book has prophecy which has been fulfilled and proven by linguistic and historical evidence.The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically. 2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.

[@colemansquestforthehunt6423]

No one has seen earth as a globe except on TV. Picard said the earth looked like a coin with upturned edge 1939 science magazine

[@christopheespic]

Yet Picard wasn't deluded as you are....

[@conspiracy1914]

they think all that google images are actual photos. all of them are renders and illustration. people who sold that literally gaslighted billions into thinking those are real photos. it doesnt take a lot to see that they all look digitally rendered. but people will still argue that and defend it

[@christopheespic]

​@@conspiracy1914I now understand your choice of nickname.... The world must be very frightening to you....

[@starspark9471]

​@@conspiracy1914 I encourage you to look at photos of your own house on Google earth. Even my car and a fault with the house is still there from the last photo taken. The scientific observations and opinion of Piccard was before any spaceship went into orbit and before any satellite was launched. He was only 10,000 feet higher than what a plane flies at. The closer one is to something gigantic, the less you're able to see of it.

[@chrissonofpear1384]

@@conspiracy1914 Well, figure out how surveyors measure distance, and build bridges longer than, one mile... and we will, see...

[@peterdobson3435]

I would ask an atheist why should anyone subscribe to your model of morality, if morality is subjective? I am sure that he would respond that his model will cause human flourishing. Ok, but why should anyone subscribe to the notion that human flourishing has a positive moral value? Perhaps I have a model of morality in which human flourishing is not a moral good? What breaks the tie between our two different views if we each, as the subjects, get to decide what is a moral good?

[@TheCustodian10000]

Atheism makes no judgment on the objectivity or subjectivity of morality. Atheism is strictly and only the rejection of the positive claim of a god or gods.

[@mrastin821]

As TheCustodian already pointed out, atheism isn't what you are questioning here. I think perhaps you are talking about moral relativism as opposed to most religions which engage in moral absolutism. Or perhaps you are discussing the origins of morality? Before engaging in such a discussion on such things, let me pose a question for you to reflect on. Do you consider slavery to be moral? Consider carefully, and please pass this through the framework of your particular religious belief system.

[@peterdobson3435]

@@mrastin821 Well, since I am a Christian, the question is very easy for me to answer. The bible states that there is no slave in Christ Jesus. Slavery and Christianity are not compatible to start with. The bible also states that every human being has been created in the image of God and has a right to the dignity appropriate to God's image bearer. So, clearly, to consider slavery as an acceptable institution, I would have to abandon biblical teaching and go against what God has said is morally right.

[@mrastin821]

@@peterdobson3435 So then, why is it in the Bible that people were given instruction in how to own slaves, how to treat them, the differences between Jewish and Gentile slaves, and on and on? Since you clearly accept the Bible as true and God inspired, then God told his chosen people (on multiple occassions) they they can own other people. And Jesus was quite clear that he didn't come to supplant the old testament. How do you rectify this?

[@richardgregory3684]

When AIG claim "it's absolutely true" you can virtually guarantee it isn't true.

[@rayspeakmon2954]

That's the most brilliant rebuttal I've ever heard! Your "Nu uhh" defense is staggering!! 😂😂😂

[@jonathanhartley5953]

What standard are you using to determine what's "true"?

[@richardgregory3684]

@@jonathanhartley5953 One based on evidence and not faith/feelings?

[@jacobostapowicz8188]

AIG claims the earth is round spherical shape

[@mrastin821]

@@jacobostapowicz8188 And? Its possible for people to get one thing right and others completely wrong.

[@billb3673]

People who are Christians that don't understand the THREE EARTH AND HEAVEN AGES live in THEIR interpretation of God's word. God said to REPLENISH THE EARTH.

[@Frakka475]

Science isn’t a religion! You make your own purpose you search for it! Also when you’re talking to someone and ask a question, you should listen to the answer not insert your interpretation over it, belittling and restricting the response. If you don’t want to listen to a response don’t pretend to ask the question because you’re running an established monologue you’re not debating or discussing!

[@Sammyxxoo]

Wherever someone gets their source of truth or what they think determines truth, is what they worship so if you think science determines what is ultimately true and that is your source of truth then that is what you worship and that’s what he means by it’s a religion.

[@seanpol9863]

​@@SammyxxooScience isn't about worship or belief; it's a method for understanding the world through evidence and testing. Calling it a "religion" misunderstands both concepts. Religion relies on faith, which means accepting things without evidence. Science relies on questioning, testing, and rejecting ideas if the evidence doesn't support them. Truth in science is provisional-it changes when better evidence comes along. That's the opposite of dogma. Saying science is a religion is like calling a hammer a philosophy-it just doesn't fit.

[@dudeifyit]

I think the weird you are looking for is "understand," not "worship."

[@DM-bh2gg]

Of course science is not religion. Atheism is religion.

[@straight-narrow-path]

The saved, Holy Spirit filled Jews repented from keeping the law and sacrificing animals for their sin and trusted that Jesus was the Messiah and that he paid for all sin . Read Acts 2. So repent from anything that you do to earn salvation .A huge number of people need to repent from repenting from sin and trust in Jesus .

[@grahamecooke4090]

Him "I don't believe the Bible, so you can't use that in your argument!" Me: "Well, I do! I don't believe in evolution, so YOU can't use that! Is that really logical?!?"

[@richardgregory3684]

No, because evolution is not reliant on a single source of evidence. The bible is a single source, and a totally unreliable and discreditted one at that. If your only evidence is a bunch og tales concocted by bronze and iron age desert nomands, it;s reasonable to say it should be discounted.

[@sirsaint88]

@@richardgregory3684 That pesky Bible, so refuted, so defeated, atheist can't stop raging at it. lol. Sorry dude, the Bible has been the most attacked book (or collection) for the last 200 years. Atheist rage and foam at the mouth, attacking it with all they have, the dust settles and the Bible still stands. Meanwhile, all the evidence used for the Scopes Trial in the early 20th century could not be used today as it's been discredited. Evolution is a fragile glass house.

[@katamas832]

Well, of course, you can use the Bible in the argument. It's just not gonna be convincing. The conclusion of a sound argument is only valid if the premises are true. If they are not evidently true, the conclusion cannot be reached. So I'd advise you not to include it. You can, but you are just wasting your time. Unless you are prepared to provide convincing evidence and or argument that the Bible as the word of God. To which I wish you good luck.

[@VanyaD]

​@@katamas832 No one wastes their time when using the Bible in arguments. God can use the Bible however He wishes. This book has true power, no human argument can be remotely as good.

[@katamas832]

​@@VanyaDWell that's a bunch of unsubstantiated claims

[@daviddavenport9350]

YOu dont know the age of the earth, Ken, because your grasp of geologic and paleontologic science is superficial at best......I would go with the guys that have studied these things for the better part of their lives and really know what they are talking about. The Bible is NOT a science book.....

[@appaloosa42]

BillNye ‘the science guy’ can’t hols a flashlight for Mr. Wizard!

[@keithwilson6060]

“…we establish laws.” - Bill Nye Laws are ALWAYS preceded by a normative standard. Morality.

[@jehandesains8674]

Which are determined by their society at a time and place. That's why laws are different all over the world, and change over time. Remember: the bible PROMOTES slavery, it tells you how to do it and even provides loopholes to better exploit people as slaves. Do you consider that moral? I sure don't.

[@am.richardson3404]

About 3 minutes in or be most anxious generation In American history. When even the self-proclaims experts admit they don't actually know the truth. Who can children turn to for true answers in their godless communities? ;(

[@jehandesains8674]

To people with an education, like most atheists.

[@andrew30m]

Honesty is the most important, if you don’t have evidence for something saying god did it isn’t honest. We know much about how the world and universe works but the great thing about science is that there is so much to still explore and learn..

[@KamekazeKuban]

Wow, I didn’t think I could have lost more respect for Bill Nye than I already had, and I’ve only made it to 3:45

[@ATIMELINEOFAVIATION]

Ok, I don’t agree with Bill Nye, but a lot of the things Ken Ham said was from a really non-objective worldview. But yes, definitely questions things with you grow older. That’s how I proved Christianity ✝

[@thomasmyers9128]

I couldn’t get past …. Nothing…. big bang…. Then something….

[@aidanya1336]

Who told you it started with nothing? Cant be an atheist because they don't actually believe that. Must have been an apologist.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

That's not really what the big bang is, though. And it has nothing to do with atheism. Ken and his goons are pushing a false dichotomy.

[@castropianoforte]

Promoting young earth nonsense is not honest. Atheistic evolution is not the only explanation of reality.

[@richardgregory3684]

Evolution is not inherently atheistic.

[@jockyoung4491]

There is nothing "atheistic" about evolution. It is just science.

[@andrew30m]

Evolution is an explanation to a very small part of our reality

[@Max_Doubt]

I was sitting at the park and a man sat beside me and began to regale me with a story of a faraway land of magic and mystery that he said actually exists! A land of elves, dwarves, wizards and even dragons! Middle Earth he called it and he even had a map of the place that showed various kingdoms like "Gondor" and "Eriador" and "Rohan." He told me of their histories; their kings and their wars of succession. He finally asked if I believed him. I asked if he had anything more to go on than his word and the map. "No," he said. So I said I didn't believe him. "Oh well," he huffed, getting up to leave, "I guess that's _your_ worldview." 🤔🤨

[@Dominicus13]

If only he had historical diggings to show those kingdoms existed, and corroborated documents about many of the events contained therin.

[@TheCustodian10000]

​@@Dominicus13 Can you present any evidence for any supernatural claim in the Bible or scriptures?

[@espoeverythingchannel11]

Lots of evidence. Just take a look at all the prophecies being fulfilled. The book of Daniel alone is amazing. Critics of the Bible though it was written after Jesus, then they found a copy in the Dead Sea Scrolls. The evidence is out there, but I don't think you are really seeking to know God​@@TheCustodian10000

[@jacobostapowicz8188]

Cool story

[@CJ-ik8qf]

@@Dominicus13oh snap! Deal evidence? 🍿

[@Iowrider714]

Please explain how Noah built a large enough vessel to take a pair of EVERY animal on it AND enough food to last them all for 40 days (or longer, I don't remember what this fairy tale actually said). But can you imagine lions, tigers and bears not trying to eat the sheep, cows, goats...etc??? What did they do with all the poop? Oh, nobody ever explained all the logistics, did they? It's impossible, but yeah, I'm supposed to have faith because it's written in some book. And do any of you know who determined exactly what was put into the Bible or how many gospels were actually written? Were these people 6,000 yrs ago so intent on getting everything right or were they more interested in putting things in there in order to make people believe it so they could control them? I'll tell you, it was the Romans who found out Christians would not renounce their faith even when fed to the lions. And when the Romans saw how strong their faith was, they decided to take it over and use it to control people and that's where Catholicism started. Then later on, people had different ideas and they branched off - these were the Protesters - the Protestants. And in turn they branched off into Methodists, Babtists, Lutherans, Episcopalaleons (sp)...all the different denominations. Amish, Memonites....all of them. And the Puritans left England to go to the new land so they could practice THEIR idea of Christianity the way THEY wanted to practice it. And then you even have one Babtist church who believes they are the only ones with Pastors who interpret the Bible the "right" way while another Babtist church a couple miles down the road has it all wrong and THEY are the only members of the RIGHT Baptist Church who will get to go to heaven. Please.

[@TC-wd4vc]

Hi friend. go to the ark exhibit, a lot of these questions are answered there. the beautiful thing about christianity, is that it has been poked and prodded and dug into and tried to be disproven for millennia..... and yet the truth still rings clear. we welcome your questions, God isn't scared.

[@yourguard4]

So, theists deny death... They talk about "purpose", but can't say what it is. And they rely on "Man's word", that they just claim to be "God's word".

[@TexanLivingInExileInLasVegas]

Check out the shorter Catechism: The Pupose of man is to glorify God and to enjoy him forever.

[@yourguard4]

@@TexanLivingInExileInLasVegas That sounds sad.

[@VanyaD]

​@@yourguard4That's fine, no one is pressuring you about anything. The choice has always been yours. If you don't like what God has to offer, namely, light, love, life, true science, wisdom and so much more, then you are, of course, free to go the other direction. However, I hope you reconsider. It doesn't sound like a good place to choose to be. Darkness, death, hatred.... It sounds sad and tragic, to be honest. But if you prefer...

[@ginapena6878]

Theist do not deny death. The purpose is to Glorify God in our person while here on Earth. Bring others to Christ . Do not let Satan deceive you.

[@yourguard4]

@@ginapena6878 So, christians don't think, that the soul is eternal? Imagine being created, just for the reason to cheer for your creator... Why does he has a need for that? And why would that purpose limited to earth? You can't do that in the afterlife? Are you saying, that God is that limited in power? That he can't "bring Christ to others" himself, but relys on you to do it? Because you can do something God can't? How arrogant.. Maybe Satan deceived you, disguised as Jesus.

[@YECBIB]

Is There Evil in the World vs. Evolution: Which Has More Evidence? To address the question of whether there is more evidence for evil in the world or for evolution, we need to analyze both concepts separately and consider their implications. Understanding Evil Evil is often defined as a moral wrong that causes harm or suffering. Philosophers and theologians have debated the nature of evil for centuries, leading to various interpretations and frameworks. The existence of evil can be observed through numerous real-world examples, such as war, crime, natural disasters, and systemic injustices. These manifestations of evil are documented extensively in literature, history, psychology, and sociology. The problem of evil poses significant philosophical questions about the nature of God, particularly in monotheistic religions that assert an all-powerful, all-knowing, and benevolent deity. This dilemma raises questions about why such a God would allow suffering and injustice to exist if He possesses the power to prevent it. The existence of evil thus serves as a critical point of discussion in theology and philosophy. Understanding Evolution Evolution is a scientific theory that explains the diversity of life on Earth through mechanisms such as natural selection and genetic drift. The evidence supporting evolution comes from multiple disciplines including genetics, paleontology, comparative anatomy, and molecular biology. Key pieces of evidence include: Fossil Record: Fossils provide a historical record of life forms that existed at different times in Earth’s history. Transitional fossils demonstrate gradual changes between species. Genetic Evidence: DNA analysis shows similarities among species that suggest common ancestry. For example, humans share approximately 98% of their DNA with chimpanzees. Observable Evolution: Instances of evolution can be observed in real-time through studies on bacteria developing antibiotic resistance or changes in animal populations due to environmental pressures. The scientific community overwhelmingly supports evolution as the best explanation for biological diversity due to this robust body of evidence. Comparative Analysis When comparing the two concepts-evil and evolution-it’s essential to recognize that they operate within different domains: one is primarily philosophical/moral while the other is scientific. Evidence for Evil: The existence of evil can be substantiated through empirical observations across various contexts (social sciences) but remains subjective regarding its moral implications. Evidence for Evolution: Evolution is supported by extensive empirical data from multiple scientific fields; it is testable and falsifiable according to scientific methods. In conclusion, while both concepts are significant in their respective realms-evil being a moral concern with observable consequences and evolution being a scientifically validated theory-the evidence supporting evolution is far more substantial when considering empirical data across various disciplines. Thus, there is more evidence for evolution than there is for the concept of evil, which relies heavily on subjective interpretation rather than empirical validation. Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question 1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy A comprehensive resource providing detailed entries on philosophical topics including ethics and the problem of evil. It offers scholarly perspectives on how these concepts have been debated throughout history. 2. National Center for Science Education (NCSE) An organization dedicated to promoting understanding and acceptance of evolutionary science among educators and the public. It provides resources that explain evolutionary theory backed by scientific research. 3. Nature Journal A leading international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all fields of science including biology and evolutionary studies. It serves as an authoritative source for current findings related to evolutionary processes

[@mrastin821]

Erm...don't you tend to post a lot about evolution not being real? Cause that's certainly not what you posted here, so perhaps I've misread things before.

[@YECBIB]

@mrastin821 In conclusion, while some may argue that advancements in AI could lead to new forms of understanding or interpretation of existence, fundamentally speaking, AI would rank very low-around 1 out of 10-when compared to God, given its limitations in existence, intelligence, moral authority, creation capacity, and spirituality

[@mrastin821]

@@YECBIB The conclusion doesn't match what you posted before, so not sure what "conclusion" you are making here, or where it stems from. Seems more of a non sequitur. In addition, given past posts I've seen you make (and from experience as a teacher), I ran the text of your first post through a pair of AI detectors. In a shocking twist of your "conclusion", that entire post is 100% AI written lol. What are you even doing?

[@YECBIB]

@mrastin821 Experimenting

[@mrastin821]

@@YECBIB With...what, exactly?

[@GSpotter63]

The fool is the one who doesn't read and understand both sides and then makes a decision.

[@de_bestburger]

Ikr

[@frosted1030]

We are laughing at you. Because here is your whole argument in a nutshell: "Nobody has seen the formation of the Earth, however I am certain that it happened by magic by my imaginary friend... even though the global consensus of informed and educated people rely on predictive modeling instead of raw egotism and have reached a different conclusion." Nope. You get nowhere with that, stop being silly and SIT DOWN.

[@Snaxx_23]

Wait till your kneeling before Jesus.

[@Renee_Crochet]

I noticed that Dr Ham had to (almost) force Mr Nye to admit that "his truth" is subjective.

[@CJ-ik8qf]

You can test and try to falsify science. You can’t do it with faith.

[@poliincredible770]

Happy 2025. Jesus is still Lord!!!

[@kibble113]

God is like a caretaker. Imagine the universe is a fishbowl. Provisions are put in the bowl by someone. Some of the fish believe there's a person outside the bowl loving us and taking care of us. Some of the fish don't know, or just think provisions appear out of thin air. God is like the person who takes care of the fish. He filled the bowl with water, made little decorations, provided food and resources.... He gave us an environment where we can not only survive, but thrive. And thriving is exactly what he wants for us, because he loves us and made this universe just for us. He wants us to succeed, because watching us succeed gives him joy. And when he's done taking care of us, for a time, God goes to his real purpose, his "day job", for lack of a better term. Our universe is just a side act, and while doing his true purpose, he can't watch us, which is why he's not always able to answer when we pray. But don't fret! After a time, God always comes back to us, and takes care of us once more. At his "job" he has to listen to a greater god, the "Middle Management" God if you will, who tells him what to do. Our God must obey, or he'll be cut off from his power and won't be able to provide for us anymore. But this greater god is himself subject to a collective of even Greater Gods, and he in turn must obey them. He must prove himself to them to be promoted into their greater collective, and our God, too, works hard for a "promotion". Some day, millions of millennia from now, our god will finally reach that "Middle Management" position and won't have time for humans anymore, as he will be far too busy managing the lesser gods under him. Some day, countless eons from now, he too hopes to also join the collective. But worry not! Like fish that live only a few years, our lives are infinitesimally short in comparison to God's. By the time God is ready to advance to this higher position, countless millennia from now, all our lives and probably our entire universe will be long gone. And he does love us and won't forget us, just as humans who keep fish never forget them. And it's likely one of God's underlings will some day create his own "Fish bowl" universe, possibly reviving humanity, or possibly favoring some other life form. So rejoice! And when you eat your next meal, remember that God worked hard for long, stressful periods to be able to provide that to you!

[@roscowbrown3937]

nit a single word of these paragraphs mean anything until you prove God, and considering that you write this comment on a video lying about science, I can guarantee you won’t do that

[@kibble113]

@@roscowbrown3937 I don't have to. It doesn't matter if you believe me or not. It won't change the truth either way.

[@bartonbagnes4605]

If people have to hear about Jesus Christ to believe, how does Jesus Christ fulfill his promise to draw ALL men unto himself if he be lifted up from the earth? Especially if Jesus Christ desires that none should parish, but all should repent. And none can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and of the Spirit.

[@bartonbagnes4605]

@YuelSea-sw2rp What about those who live their entire lives without hearing the Gospel or even the name Jesus Christ? Jesus Christ promised to draw ALL men. So when and how does he draw those?

[@VanyaD]

​@@bartonbagnes4605 Creation itself is evidence for Jesus, as the Bible says, so that none have excuse. You live in this super complicated world that obviously took some great mind to bring into being. Your failing to see that convicts you. Also, Jesus wishes that none would perish, and is everpatient, giving chance after chance to people. But if you simply don't want anything to do with Him, He won't force you to accept Him. It will be your decision to not be with Him and He will honor it. The consequences, however, will be for you to bear, and the Bible is clear it won't be nice to be outside the city of Life. So, if you don't know what to trust, do look at the evidence and not just as presented by scientists who want to keep their jobs and grants. There are plenty of honorable scientists out there, even evolutionists, who say evolution is nonsense and the world is too complicated to accommodate evolution in terms of one species turning into another. I hope God gives you wisdom and understanding.

[@TheCustodian10000]

​@VanyaD How have you concluded that the world ultimately required a 'great mind'?

[@srhendry]

You say that the earth is round and spins but Psalm 104:5 says "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved." You are clearly contradicting what the Bible says. So, how can we believe you when you claim the earth is 6000 years old. You are trying to usurp God by forcing God to be in your image. Don't be so arrogant, and claim you so fully understand the mind of God.

[@richardgregory3684]

Well, the bible is talking nonsense.

[@VanyaD]

Dear person, the Earth is not flat. Yes it has been set on its foundations, but that doesn't mean a flat Earth foundation. It means it has been given laws and ordinances that make it do what it's supposed to.

[@scottfw7169]

The Psalms are songs of poetry and emotion not a science textbook, Psalm is is literally a Greek musical term. Psalm 104:19, says the sun knows when to set: in order to know things there must be a conscious mind, in order to have a conscious mind there must be biological life, therefore the Bible says the sun, Sol, is a living biological person with a brain, a mind. Taking the Bible literally does not mean every word is a literal fact of hard science, it means take the Bible like the library of literature that it is, some is documentary, some is biography, some is history, some is poetry, some is song lyrics. The book of Psalms says outright that it has poetry and song lyrics. True, songs and poetry can relate observable fact, mostly though they are metaphorical impressionistic imagery like that 1971 classic, I felt the earth move under my feet, I felt the sky tumbling down. Human nature is to use metaphor in song. David and the others who wrote the content in Psalms were just as human as the rest of us. God set this Earth on a foundation of an orbit around the sun and this Earth will stay there in that orbit until God acts to cause it to do otherwise.

[@arpalm11]

8:37 according to the Bible the first 2 people were created on day 6 not day 7...I guess he misspoke.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

God bless, AIG 😊🙏✝️🕊️ appreciate all you do

[@edenkor]

You appreciate that they are lying to people, lying to children? WOW!

[@ranbran2948]

Please stop adding background music when people are talking /teaching.

[@pangorbalm8086]

23:00 I got a hard question for you brother Ken... Did you know that the trinity is actually an abomination and you're worshiping the wrong god and the wrong Jesus??

[@edgarrodriguez2332]

The word science is defined as the study of………

[@mspoints4fre123]

Rather live in a fantasy than an uncomfortable truth of no life after death. I can see the appeal but don't deny that you're deluding yourself.

[@ivanmelicor5963]

Did God say the earth is spinning?

[@pangorbalm8086]

26:50 You can't be both Calvinist and Arminianism bro. Just like you can't be a Christian and also a satanist. You're speaking ignorantly. You talk about giving a defense for your faith and giving answers but you haven't bothered to study the stark contrasted differences between Calvinism and Arminianism and yet you'll talk about them with supposed authority saying that you're both? LOL smh...

[@valdezfam]

Less than five minutes into the video and there are so many flaws and questions and the arrogance is through the roof. Not sure if it is worth finishing the video, as I assume it is just more of this, but will try.

[@stephenhill3286]

It's actually scary that thiests need the Bible to tell them not to be bad people

[@stevolanddownunder3549]

Its actually more scary that you don't realise that .

[@stephenhill3286]

@stevolanddownunder3549 no, I really don't.

[@zachlahners6961]

This is not what theists believe, its a misconception. We believe that its possible for EVERYONE to know right/wrong without the Bible, because we believe it is an objective universal moral law, that everyone is aware of to some extent. The moral law is written on every human heart. We believe that humans who lived before the Bible was written/canonized would still be aware of the moral law, and therefore were still responsible for breaking the law. So, the argument is not that anybody NEEDS the Bible to tell them to be a good person. The argument is whether an OBJECTIVE good/bad moral law exists, which theists will say yes. Does that make sense?

[@ManlyServant]

its not scary,we are literally reason why your society can stop comitting human sacrifice and rampant perversion like r4p3 temple of pagans (which atheists at that time recreationally does too) and so many other thing you guys did,its morality from a book that saves you,the actual disgusting thing is when someone has no standard of morality and is followin just about EVERYTHING the current people subjective moral agreement,which can change anytime and as show as how you guys now ok with lgbt doing disgusting thing with kids,im not going to be surprised if its going to go back to pagan times,but nothing scary tho just disgusting since u guys are weak 😂,we can conquer you anytime LITTLE bro😂,its just western religious people being too apathethic since in 1900s that causes all this madness grows

[@kalinamay]

Hey, is that Bill Nye the science guy he was talking to?

[@RabittTunesTV]

Can god lie ?

[@kigensama]

Does anyone know what that compact Bible he has is?

[@artix548]

"No one else was in the room where it happened, so we just assume that it happened." - Aaron Burr method of Modern Science

[@christophesutter1844]

Malheureusement l idée de l évolution n est pas nouveau Anaximandre mathématicien grec qui a fait ses études en Égypte (600 ans avant J-C) a rapporté cette idéologie clandestine en Grèce et ce n étaient pas le seul à avoir rapporté ces théories mortifère 🔥💜🔥paix en christ

[@TexanLivingInExileInLasVegas]

Thank you for that information. I am a teacher, and I have not traced the idea back that far.

[@jockyoung4491]

Ah yes, the obligatory title change. Apparently the first one wasn't enough click bait. But yes, if you openly insult atheists, they just might take offense. But that was the purpose, wasn't it?

[@HS-zk5nn]

changing title is allowed. I dont see the problem.

[@jasonstclair1329]

Insult an atheist… to easy 😉

[@richardgregory3684]

Changing titles agan, huh?

[@mryou2434]

I would say a battle between GOD's word and satan's word. Man just the mouth piece of satan. Make no mistake Christ can destroy satan with a breath.

[@christopheespic]

Really? Sad he hasn't done it yet.... He probably doesn't care about us 🙄.

[@richardgregory3684]

_Make no mistake Christ can destroy satan with a breath._ Strange how apparently god hasn't bothered to do it then, but instead allowa Satan to cause all sorts of evil, mayhem and suffering - mostly inflicted on what the bible tells us is that which god cherishes above all else, which is us.

[@gregoryt8792]

@@christopheespicHe is just waiting for you to believe while there is still time. In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert, proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. No other book has prophecy which has been fulfilled and proven by linguistic evidence.The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically. 2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.

[@mryou2434]

He hasn't done it yet because there is a ," right time" for everything and now is not the right time for that. Romans 5:6 - King James Version 6 You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. 7 Very rarely will anyone die for a righteous person, though for a good person someone might possibly dare to die. 8 But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. As for caring for us: John 15:15 King James Version 15 Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you. I would encourage you to read all of the Gospel of John. Also Ecclesiastes chapter 3. I pray i see you in heaven. John 14:6 King James Version 6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. Romans 10:8,9,10 8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach; 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

[@mryou2434]

I am glad you recognize satan is responsible for evil. When Adam and Eve disobeyed GOD it brought death and evil into the world. It's been here ever since. It gave satan jurisdiction over humanity. satan is evil, he loves the shedding of blood. But Christ died and shed His blood for us that we be reconciled to GOD. The Bible says there is a time for everything. GOD does everything at the right time. At the right time He will put an end to evil. In the mean time it is up to us to make sure our name is written in the Lamb's book of life. Remember Jesus said to the theif on the cross, " today you will be with me in paradise." John 14:6 King James Version 6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. Romans 10:8,9,10 8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach; 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. Hope this helps. I would really recommend you read the New Testament.

[@betaorionis2164]

Zillionth video where AiG titles “Atheists will hate it” but actually it doesn’t say anything else than “trust me, bro” and Scripture quotes. Ken, you’re going to have to work harder.

[@edbrackeen5979]

Got you watching

[@STAMATT125]

You didn't discover gravity did you? The entire concept is a trust me bro from Newton 💀 Wait wait, Google is a massive 'trust me bro', never look stuff up from that I guess.

[@mrastin821]

@@STAMATT125 Newton discovered the relationship between gravity and mass, that it didn't have a distance limit (ie. unified the "heavens and the Earth"), and figured out an equation that mathematically demonstrated that relationship. He didn't explain where gravity came from or what its cause was. And his calculations gave us the ability to test his idea, and insofar as it goes, his work was correct and quite brilliant. It's the testing of the idea, done over and over, that gives us reason to trust Newton's findings.

[@betaorionis2164]

⁠​⁠@@STAMATT125Except that every mechanical device ever engineered works following the Laws of Newton. And except that every object in the Solar System is SEEN every night at the place that the Laws of Kepler (closely related to gravity) predicted, without any single difference for 400 years. Feel free to believe gravity is “trust me bro” stuff, but don’t complain if you are mocked ore told to go back to school.

[@seandriver7923]

Believing a lie that's hopeless

[@Mastodonian]

I feel hate is something we all should try to avoid. Its pointless, wastefull and dangerous. Why is it both sides often try to be so hostile against each other. W.W.J.D.? He would embrace everyone who tried to do good. Try to be more like him. Dont hate, haters gonna hate.

[@totaled108]

Having been raised in a cult, this all sounds so familiar. If religion helps you have a fulfilling life and you don’t hurt others, or force others to believe what you believe, more power to you.

[@LoneWolfSecCH]

The scientific method is a tool but some wants it to become a religion, science is not something to believe in, it is an instrument to help mankind discover the world and how things work, I think that anything that can't be demonstrated experimentally should not reach the rang of a theory, it should remain a hypothesis .

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

Yeah, creationists want science to be considered religion. Who are you even arguing against here?

[@LoneWolfSecCH]

@Creationism-is-pseudoscience I'm just saying that science is not supposed to be a religion, I met people who claim to believe in science and infact they act and think like religious people , that's why I'm arguing science is a tool and not a religion and I don't agree with what Bill Nye says about right and wrong , read my comment above about that , we have 2 different ways of seing the same subject

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

@@LoneWolfSecCH You're right. It's not and it isn't. The only ones who treat it as such are flat earthers and creationists.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@LoneWolfSecCH Experimentation is not required for science. It helps, but inferences can be based on observational data. We do it all the time in every day life.

[@LoneWolfSecCH]

@@jockyoung4491 yes but data and observations are then used in everyday life, there are observations and data that don't produce anything and can't be used experimentally so they should remain hypothesis . There are many hypothesis about the "beginning" of the universe, one I find fashinating is the Big Crunch hypothesis, have you ever heard about it ? Big Bang has most scientific consensus but we should admit that we don't know for real what exactly happened, most observations and data leads up to Big Bang as the most accurate answer but it fails to explain what caused the primordial universe into existence , virtual particles that suddenly came into existence ? Who knows, even virtual particles should have come from somewhere, I find the subject really fashinating in any case, even the God hypothesis should be taken into account in my opinion. Multiverse hypothesis is very interesting too but I feel like no hypothesis explains so well what caused everything to be there, that's where the God hypothesis becomes viable in my opinion, I'm not talking about the God of the Bibble or another religion, I'm talking about God in the sense of the "force" that made everything come into existence. The Bibble offers in my opinion a good take on who God is.

[@occamsrazor9183]

Why when I go to comments it will say there's a number of comments, but we cannot see them until the page is refreshed? There's no Atheists in a foxhole pinned down under fire...

[@aidanya1336]

What makes you think there are no atheists in foxholes under fire? Seems like something someone just made up and said and now every one is repeating it.

[@burnttoast2790]

Anyone making the foxhole argument is basically telling on themselves, because they're tacitly admitting that they think people only actually turn to a higher power in times of emotional distress, rather than _thinking_ about it.

[@Arigato-Mister-Roboto]

So weird that the very first comments in these videos are always atheistic. Within minutes of the video being posted sometimes. Thou dost protest too much me thinks

[@TheCustodian10000]

The first atheistic comment appeared after the first 8 comments, 7 of which were theistic and 1 of which was neutral.

[@luish1498]

imagine if this channel made videos telling lies about mechanical engineering. The most normal thing would be to find comments from mechanical engineers exposing the lies, don't you think? but what this channel does is liyng about atheism, science, evolution etc so is normal you found atheists, scientists, evolutionary biologists in this section of coments.

[@Arigato-Mister-Roboto]

@ terrible analogy and totally incorrect. It’s the same users making comments tho. Yourself including made a post a few minutes ago and have now come back to post again in response. This is not engineering or mechanical theory this is a channel about religious beliefs. These people have a belief and your constant appearance in the comments show less of a defense against so called lies but more of a hatred towards the beliefs.

[@luish1498]

@@Arigato-Mister-Roboto«terrible analogy and totally incorrect« nope. « this is a channel about religious beliefs.« exactly. but the fun part is this «religious» channel focus to much in THEORIES, SCIENTIFIC THEORIES that makes their belief wrong!! «These people have a belief and your constant appearance in the comments show less of a defense against so called lies but more of a hatred towards the beliefs.» i give a F for people beliefs but if the people that believe have to lie about science that makes their beliefs not true then its my «job» to expose those lies. and this channel lies a lot about science that makes them wrong.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@Arigato-Mister-Roboto "this is a channel about religious beliefs." Not when it makes claims about science. If all it discussed were religious belifes, I wouldn't be here. Lie about science and I will respond.

[@rexgoodheart3471]

While you're on the subject of Australia, please explain, given the ridiculous Noah's flood story, how kangaroos and wallabies hopped to there from Mount Ararat.

[@sandrajackson709]

So him not being able to accept his mortality that somehow makes it untrue? Atheism isn't about accepting what we want to accept it's about accepting the truth which has no obligation to provide you with emotional comfort and it has no worries about what it implies or how you feel about what it implies. It has no consideration of whether or not you are left with a sense of purpose or what you do in response to it, Its plenty of things I wished I did not have to accept but I have no choice if it's the truth with evidence establishing it to be true. Accepting that I won't be here forever with my life having an end point just as it had a starting point is not a philosophy I hold, it's reality. Nothing says because you are an atheist that you don't wish for there to be more to life and that it was easier or that you have some particular preference for there to be no god it just means you accept what is apparent, what is evident and not accepting what isn't apparent until or if it ever becomes apparent it's about preferring the truth for the sake of truth rather than believing for the sake of believing . If you are expecting the truth to always reveal what you want it to and looking for it to always be convenient then you are not looking for the truth. If you are sincere about finding the truth you you put aside any emotional bias, or any expectation for it to provide you with any benefits other than having the truth, You accept it on it's own terms without trying to add extra to it to make it imply what you want it to imply You don't get to deny reality because you don't like it , well you can but it won't stop the truth from being the truth and all the wishing. believing ,having faith or how bad you think you need for there to be a god, its not going to produce one if one does not exist, or make what's impossible become possible. Reality does not comport with you , your ideas, likes and dislikes you comport with it,. Truth is that which comports with reality, and if you are searching for it you accept what it reveals or doesn't reveal like it or not which isn't a philosophy or a worldview to accept the reality you are confronted with Can theist stop pretending that their ideas about morality are not any less subjective than any non believer and the moral systems that are based on other religions they do not subscribe to as they hand picked the religion's that most closely aligns with their subjective moral views. If religion is subjective then so too are the moral based on that religion and just within any particular religion there is still no one consensus on what is actually moral or anything that precludes anyone from interpreting morality the way they subjectively interpret it. It doesn't take a religion to figure out what you do not appreciate being done to you and to not do those things to others