Do Singularities Come From Our Mind? Understanding The Limits Of Human Perception (Metaphysics)

Discord: / discord
Patreon / thirdeyetyrone
PayPal: www.paypal.me/...
Instagram: www.instagram.... thirdeyetyrone_?
Locals: bruhtheimpaler...
#metaphysical #metaphysics #universemessage #universe #matrix #mystic #philosophy #psychedelic #spiritualawakening #conciousness #thirdeye #christconsciousness #lightworker #wizard #terrancemckenna #dimensions #spirituality #multidimensional #multiverse #alanwatts

[@GarOfTheField]

You won't probably believe this, but you are a prophet of the divine. You are here to help God realize himself. You have been very helpful. Good job, & the Gods bless you. 😊

[@dylanmerrittt]

fr

[@deathbydeviceable]

What if God didn't want to understand himself?

[@dylanmerrittt]

@@deathbydeviceable it is up to us to speak our truth and in a way we are god/the universe experiencing itself, so who knows, maybe it is beyond human comprehension

[@deathbydeviceable]

@dylanmerrittt not really. It's all right in front of us especially in music through to the illumated. In new songs coming out you can tell God is hiding and wants nothing to do with the world. Also gonna add if you think you're God and Gods it's gonna be a lonely afterlife with nothing but a flooded world through your own tears

[@dylanmerrittt]

@@deathbydeviceable i’m not so sure about that but to each their own, we both have different views and that’s okay

[@LordLightborn]

Love watching our community grow through the love you express for reality.

[@NightmareCourtPictures]

incredible insight as always, especially in the first few minutes, how you succinctly equate logic as a type of perception by making obvious that singularities in our visual field, are just like singularities in logic.

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

Thank you.

[@dylanmerrittt]

dude i love all of your videos and have been deep diving on your whole page, i resonate with a lot of the ideas you approach and honestly i’m so glad that you keep posting, definitely my favourite channel on youtube. i am one of the others i feel like you seek, i’d be interested on what you think about synchronicity and/or platos cave. 🙏🤔

[@patobarajas7207]

Oooh, @thirdeyetyrone please talk about this ^ . Fascinating 🤨

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

I recently did a video on synchronicity. It’s titled “the secret to seeing synchronicity”. I also speak on Plato’s cave in several of my videos. One that comes to mind is “asking why will lead you to some strange places”

[@Italianjedi7]

I so agree! You pass the singularity when you die. What comes next; we cannot imagine. I also think that your concept of a singularity is more accurate than what people think is at the center of a black hole. There is evidence that singularities (in cosmology) do not exist

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

Wouldn’t it be funny if the singularity logic told us was out there in space was actually the one in our head interfering with our models. I think I will do a on this

[@RSanchez111]

Non-Euclidean geometry was literally a different dimension to classical Euclidean geometry. Once we became aware of it, we gained the ability to perceive it. It was an expansion of our logic. Everything is logic. There's just axioms we settle on to understand a certain level (or dimension) to explore it before we can keep uncovering new levels. Godel's incompleteness theorems tell us we always need a level above the current level of logic to be able to explain everything in the current level, and then that level above needs another level above it, ad infinitum. It's turtles all the way down.

[@katiehorneshaw995]

Exactly. Humans are uniquely capable of expanding along with the extension of reality. Our brains are massive and capable of so much more than we currently have them doing. Just as a section of our brain will atrophy if we cease to use it, new areas of function grow with need. The trick is to keep pushing up against the boundaries of what is known

[@808dash]

So would access or data to the level above our current level of logic only be accessible after the collective whole of observers (or majority of humans) reach the next level awareness/the next level of logic up? If so how would we even go about that or comprehend how

[@RSanchez111]

@@808dash I believe it only takes one person to show everyone else the way.

[@808dash]

@@RSanchez111 hmm, I agree and disagree with that statement. My current paradigm when it comes to this is that we are all interconnected; all just leaves on a big tree (this is a very simplified way of saying it) and each leaf is a reflection of the tree in its entirety. A micro of the macro, but in order to cause a constant change like a shift in our level current level of logic and ascend to the next level on the ladder then at least half of the leaves on that tree need to be able to occupy and access said data on the next level of logic. Half of the collective

[@theotormon]

This is a very interesting channel. I saw the light once when I took a high dose of acid. This idea that one can always move closer to it but never finally arrive has crossed my mind many times.

[@Julie-ns3vh]

❤ Yesterday I was trying to imagine almost exactly what you’re describing. It makes me think about how we’re all interconnected.

[@AshSo1142]

Love your content and this discussion, commenting mostly for the algorithm thank you🙏🏼

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

Thank you for engaging

[@caveyful]

Singularities may have something to teach us about consciousness. Another parallel is that a black hole is to the universe what death is to consciousness.

[@patobarajas7207]

“Find out until you croke” hit my soul so hard. Hahah yes ,dat us.

[@Deathington.]

Thanks for this. I would like you to discuss your interpretation of anti-anthropocentric theories of conciousness. As well, I love that you include and discuss physical models and I'd love to see you dive further into what lies within this comparison.

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

I am going to talk about this probably in my next video. Stay tuned

[@crowley3015]

You're all chasing something you will never find, there is no end to it, you will chase it until you die and then after that you will do it again and again and again and again and again and again and again and it will never end, it's a trap. Stop go find love that is where you will find it.

[@jeffreysmith8719]

Great channel!

[@ChadwickFontenot-yt2ot]

Everything and I mean everything is paradoxical. It’ll always bring you right back here to you because, well, surprise…you’re it…you’re your own grandpa, father, son, grandson, brother, etc because there is no other..lol..it’s all ONENESS. It’s the death of your grandma, & the birth of your 1st born on the same day. It goes on & on & on & on like a cosmic game of hide-n-seek. I and My Father are one. My Fathers house has many rooms..i.e..consciousness is deep like a 7-layer dip, bro. We are the million mask of God

[@lolmikuq8750]

Seems like these singularities holds entire universes on their own, or at least they hold all the necessary informations/material to build one...

[@Moxiumous]

who knows lmaoo

[@matthewserletic906]

Thank you!!

[@jersonperez1266]

You don’t sound crazy keep posting more

[@ISLAND_THUNDER]

I was here before 10K subs, and I am also here celebrating 100K subs 😮

[@crowley3015]

I wish you guys could hear what I am saying but I'm not sure you can anymore. The "singularity" leads nowhere, it's the same thing as trying to get rich and powerful, and then still being depressed, you're just chasing your own tail... LOVE is all that matters, there is no higher calling than LOVE. Fucking stop doing this shit to yourselves.

[@Ashikabi.]

😤 Speculative metaphysics leads to elements beyond the fifth element.

[@blakesheumaker6413]

killer video as usual

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

Thank you for watching

[@uncannydeductionExtras]

Well done!

[@uncannydeductionExtras]

Your value just increased to me.

[@Clover-qz8nl]

Thank youuuu for your great work on this piece ❤️ it’s really inspiring to hear it from you and your team in this community of people who are trying to get better and to help others to achieve their dreams in this world of success and happiness ❤️ thank youuuu and thank youuuu and thank youuuu for being so kind and understanding my friend I love you 😘❤️💕 thank youuuu and thank youuuu very very so very very much

[@confessor4943]

Over about a month, ive listened to every single one of your videos, many multiple times. I really love your content, and you put things into words that are so clear. Ive allways had a mystical bent, but early life conditioning and trauma kind of messed that up, but over the past few years im trying to find my way home, whatever that means, and i find you to be an excellent pointer toward this end. Are you going to be more active on locals or patreon, because i plan on joining wherever you'll be posting more. Thank you, brother!

[@crowley3015]

Love is your way home.

[@confessor4943]

@@crowley3015 thank you for the reply, I will meditate on this

[@churchdog]

This is reminiscent of the oruborus

[@bernardjonathan7648]

That’s why no one has ever seen a rainbow sideways and the end of it it’s inertia.

[@alexcusmir8510]

Nailed it again

[@churchdog]

So fucking beautiful

[@Jeffroh]

I never understood the thinking of ppl at CERN and the like whos stated goal was the creation of miniature black holes... I mean intentionally evoking something which eats light.... What could go wrong?

[@AnnonymousPrime-ks4uf]

I have more stuff for you to consider. This will be quite long. I divided it into a 3 part dissertation lol... However it is in relation to the nature of consciousness.

[@AnnonymousPrime-ks4uf]

(Part 1) You know I see this in terms of "domains" or aspects reality. What's real to us to our particular level of reality is real in the context of the domain we are able to perceive. But it may not hold in a different domain. I tend to see a domain as a collection of objects like a set. Given that our perception is limited. I would say that it grasps reality in terms of those domains which is creating a kind of contrast were we see separate stochastic fields with apparently no connection to each other until we expand our frame. However since I said there's a multitude of domains those domains do change in time and interact with each other. Their interactions may actually have a connection which consciousness that has the property of dissolving the subject and object distance that's a fancy way of saying that consciousness is non local. Since we already discovered that the universe is not locally real that relates to our awarness of it that is to the given domain or aspect of reality we look from. However that would affirm the contrary that the universe is globally real. And that which is globally real may be consciousness as a kind of language that acts as a function which allows for the transitions between the different domains or aspects of reality to take effect. From the liminal realm being able to create causalistic formative structures like through the use of morphogenic fields that may organize those stochastic fields at higher levels of organziation of reality into representations or objects and that may be consciousness as that which creates such a function. So to say that reality is conscious may refer to this "shared language" which is what consciousness may be and by which reality it self organizes itself and which dictates its interactions. Like a function that connects those domains or stochastic fields together. Just as we have words to form sentences from sound. What is that which converts sounds to words? Our particular dialect of language. So I would think the same works here as well. Perhaps through the use of morphogenic fields it allows those stochastic fields to homogenize into something greater than themselves creating formative causalistic structures. Something that cames in mind in relation to this is cymatics for instance. It's interesting to think of it that way. This reminds me of IIT theory as well stating that consciousness is integrated information and perhaps integrated information is language itself. Perhaps language is actually like the quantum wave function and it's collapse is when it is gaining a definite form into a representation or object. Formscapes made a vid about this aspect in relation to archtypes and it may have a connection with consciousness too. Archtypes may be in fact like the sentences or phrases we use like a kind of blueprint for formative causalistic structures. So perhaps what we view is the current like our perception is perhaps inherently static. I often gave the example of this. Imagine a tank in ww2. The tank has a visor which splits perception into two. When one looks on the left a change occurs on the right and when one looks on the right a change happens on the left creating like the inversed polarization of our perception from our right and left hemisphere when disconnected as seeing as those separate stochastic fields and as opposed when we achieved hemisynch and seeing the relation between them through the function and language of consciousness. To us it appears as tho things change only when we perceive them but that's only because that's the moment our perception even registers them. We can't know outside our perception. So automatically we would see the changes when we perceive them. But since the universe is not locally real that shows that our perception is not ultimately reliable and that there are other hidden and intangible connections which may perform those changes. What we see within quantum mechanics is like a black box approach. We apply this approach as in a way mirroring logical positivism which stated that which is real is that which has substance and evidence. This is useful in terms of being able to count the instances in which we see something and that allows for creating computations through which we can calculate and quantify the number of instances that a given phenomenon is taking place and making sense of it mathematically. But this relates still to our perception like the causalistic structures that we form the words and sentences we use. But consciousness is the language itself which is the totality of all possible causalistic structures including all possible words and sentences. This forms the distinction of trying to put things into those stochastic domains as creating boundaries through our awarness and perception and that's how we view things at our local level of reality seeing them separate. But consciousness as this function and language itself may be more like a pattern that is non computable representing all possible patterns as qualia and connects those stochastic fields and we can only know this pattern relative to our perception and registration of the stochastic domains we became aware of but which became a boundary to the rest of reality that is the rest of the stochastic domains and the consciousness that connects them. So the relation I would ultimately see think that awarness divides like it splits through Psi and it's like the contour of a picture but imagine that the contour is proportional to how many agents there are. So imagine like slices of pizza for instance. And then consciousness is like the color and texture which is shared within all those slices. As you can see we already see the difference. Awarness relates to us counting and quantifying those instances via our perception computing them while consciousness relates to the qualia itself that is non computable for its present within and without.

[@AnnonymousPrime-ks4uf]

(Part 2) The relation between those slices relative to our perception seeing those changes according to our limited access to this language of consciousness is akin to that visor of 180° split into two in which each we see those disparate instances creating those dialectics. So dialectics is like our use of this language of consciousness that sees in contrasts of black background and white text as with the liar paradox precisely because we see changes of those slices in color and tone as well as their texture and then we attribute a change to a slice rather than the qualia within itself that's present within all slices. But consciousness itself as the totality of all possible patterns may actually be holographic and fractal in nature in which this contrast may not be present like in the example with the tank the commander that opens the hatchet and has a 360° view of the whole . But that's non duality and we as humans through the inversed polarization configuration of our brain and perception may not be able to even see that hence why non duality is so difficult to us I'm thinking. So perhaps the pattern of language is non duality like this movement of within and without like with the slices and color and texture of the pizza. But this "shared language" of consciousness itself may actually be the totality of patterns that allow for such a movement which I'm thinking it could represent like all possible geometries which represent a set of computations that can be used to form such representations or objects. In that way it appears to us that consciousness is perceivable to us only via such objects and representations owing to their geometry. But consciousness as this "shared language" itself may be the sum of all that like imagine superimposed geometries of top of each other like in higher dimensions. That's difficult to grasp for our brain. So we only see things relative to our present in which we have that 180° tank visor split and it's dialectical process which creates the effect of motion like with a lenticular lens. While consciousness as being the tank commander og 360° may akin to lorn the stereoscopic image. This movement of within and without I would say is what reflection is. Reflection relies on something to propagate in a given medium and for it to interact with something else. So consciousness as those patterns may be this reflection which if the universe is holographic and it describes consciousness as I said could be that this reflection is representative of the holographic nature of consciousness. So the presence of pattern could suggest the presence of consciousness reflecting itself within this holographic nature of consciousness. Such as realizing that all slices of pizza share the same texture and color. Now those patterns which are in effect the connection between those disparate relative to our perception stochastic domains may actually represent relations. So consciousness being the sum of all patterns may represent the sum of all relations. Just as language is essentially that it's not one thing one sentence, word, phrase, etc but it is everything all relations possible. Through the relations of those which form patterns and constitute causalistic structures of consciousness as geometries which are the representations of the objects we perceive. So perhaps reality as this language is a sandbox. Just as within a sandbox there are a few set of rules such as the need to create a pattern within non duality. But those rules which are general enough to allow for different patterns. The same could be seen in relation to consciousness as this "shared language". Hence perhaps that's why through consciousness we imagine the unthinkable even when we don't have such an object existing within reality at this moment. But we bring it from within to without just as the pattern of reflection itself.

[@AnnonymousPrime-ks4uf]

(Part 3) Now there's something else to consider at this level of reality. We tend to view information in terms of bivalent principle as you said which is a principle of duality and contrast via our logic. But that's again seeing things in terms of disparate countable and quantifiable stochastic domains and seeing as like bits which can only have one state. But when we have consciousness binding into causalistic structures like through a function such domains I would argue together increase the complexity of information in such a way that if we have two domains connected via a function now it's not uni directional anymore - > / < - but rather < - - > as the exchange and interactions that I talked about which takes place. The stochastic domains are akin to like the sounds, the connected domains via the function are akin to like words, and the functions in concert with each other as multiple domains interacting within a system forming a pattern is akin to like a sentence, and this can go on and on. This is what I meant by saying that the complexity of information increases. When we are dealing with a pattern as a function at this point that is neither < - - > as digital bytes,- > / < - as binary bits, but rather it becames as realistic photon +, and if we continue with this we get even more complexity higher than any of this like a × qubit. Those can be seen as inputs of information that we can access. However before I continue mind you absent consciousness as the function that unifies and binds those stochastic fields which is what information is ordered data. The stochastic fields would just be data not able to form information. So those types of information I discussed can be seen as different inputs such as txt, jpeg, mid, etc. Now when we put all those together that is the totality of all information independent of its complexity we get consciousness as this language that permeates ie reflects all in all. Consciousness then can be seen as the white box which unfolds before us and reveals to us. While the black box of our perception and inward awarnes is unfolding itself like an ouroboros. This is quite a long reply but I'm interested in your thoughts and feedback.

[@jackbrown8735]

i've always theorised that the singularity is god, alongside the theory that our universe is inside a black hole and that black hole is inside an infinite amount more black holes. and with that theres an additional part that mentions that our universe started with a singularity as an infinitely dense point of light. in the beginning of the bible god says: "let there be light". I believe the Singularity is God since it transcends all forms of logic.

[@AnnonymousPrime-ks4uf]

Something else to consider. A singularity may actually be the collapse of dimensions. As you see within the image that you presented there's a movement of contraction of sorts. I tend to think it this way. The singularity is this movement of contraction and collapse towards a singular vanishing point. I would say that our perception is actually containing projections which represent multiple point perspectives. There's a movement of folding and unfolding I would say. The blackhole collapses and folds back while the whitehole unfolds. Light itself could be the whitehole which would mean it has that intrinsic dimensionality to it having multiple point perspective. If you tend to look at it our 3D world is really a 3 point perspective which corresponds with the dimensions of light . While the collapse of that perhaps it is the diminishing towards a vanishing point. The tessaract structure in that image that you showed may represent the expansion of light and its amplification into higher order structures and then collapsing back to its vanishing point the singularity the dot. Something worth considering and perhaps exploring. If we take it that there's actually two movements of folding and unfolding. If you are to take a cube in 3D you can then see that it you unfold it you get like a cross in 2D. So the cube is like the folded version and the cross is the unfolded version. Maybe this has something to do with it as well. Perhaps the illusion of the vanishing point is that there is this matrix but perhaps it isn't and we only find that out by unfolding further. Perhaps something like Neo being identified with the simulated matrix or unfolding as you say through seeing in time and then folding the code intrinsic within you. Perhaps to find that code within you is within the 2D perspective or lower while the 3D perspective maintains the illusion of time and the matrix. I would say this is a difference between two aspects. Perhaps this distance relative to that vanishing point is representing the process which is sight and the seeing through time as you termed it and I also used it some time is perhaps vision which sees the end goal. What's more perhaps the singularity itself represents a fractal. Imagine that the cube is like a voxel so it can be used as a kind of fractal creating our simulation the fractalized reality and if you get rid of one you get more of itself. Perhaps then to unfold it there's a different process perhaps like you would smelt gold as ore into ingots. Perhaps the transition you speak of is in fact a transmutation and smelting which requires pressure. Perhaps it has to do with shaping and moulding reality rather than take it as it is. I'm thinking mathematically speaking perhaps it is a stratification and movement of complexity from simplicity. Perhaps the 1D is the function that defines relationships while then the more we unfold and expand it the higher it increases in dimensionality to something like an array in 2D and then something like a tensor of some sorts which constructs our perceiving reality in 3D and then it contracts and folds back towards the function into 1D. Randomness is not something that exists in terms of mathematical objects. So perhaps what we perceive as randomness is this process of transition from one state to another from complexity to simplicity and back again. For us it would appear as tho those things are random but that's only because there are an infinite number of possible computations the more there's an increase of dimensionality. Hence why it's easier for us to perceive when the dimensionality collapses and reduces itself because there are less variables and Computations to be performed in identifying them. I would say one of my designed concepts here. I think reflection is this movement from within to without which is perhaps that which allows for the increase of dimensionality. Just like I told about in the explanation with lenticular lenses absorbing light. The act of absorption of light allows for reflection and for the given instance of a lenticular lens to be perceived. So it's like that "bouncing" as we call it which is the reflection allows for it to be seen. Here's the thing a tensor in theory contains all the necessary components to reconstruct an image. What if this light is the tensor? And then it is the tensor as this light that cames in and reflects and expands revealing itself showing that instance as it stratifies and then it is folding back unto itself. Now I would imagine this. Reflection is in fact in this sense change. We could look then in terms of the lenticular lens shifting that this reflection allows for motion e which is computation. Now in theory as I said the higher this shifting and this effect can be perpetuated the more rate of change there will be. Perhaps this rate of change is what Time is. So we could consider it as FPS and the faster it is. The more faster things render before us in such a way that this shifting of the instances within the lenticular lens allows for them to at some moment appear as being both at the same time and closing the distance or merging forming like an animation of a being like the qubit of the Phoenix that I mentioned some other time the higher the processing speed and computations it can perform. This then perhaps forms the perception of our reality but essentially the higher speed we have perhaps that's how we close the distance faster. This is just my theory. Maybe you can find some useful ideas from it. What are your thoughts on it?

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

I’m going to talk about this in a future video, but perhaps the singularity isn’t a collapse of dimensions. It’s more like where another dimension begins. Remember the video I used in this video where there is a 2D figure walking around a cube. You can think of a singularity as the corner of the cube that the 2D figure can’t see. I think it has some to do with folding as well. I’m gathering my thoughts on it for an upcoming video

[@AnnonymousPrime-ks4uf]

@@ThirdEyeTyrone Look into mathematical objects and types of projections as well as 1,2,3,4 point perspective in technical drawing. Those seem to be relevant to what you are presenting. You said you wanted to create a model of reality. You can try to make it have some form by trying to add concepts together into a certain kind of pattern rather than having them all over the place. While you give a breadth of information through your approach you are only acting as a receiver for yourself. But you have to be able to convey that information as well and a model is something that can work for both you and your audience. And that requires condensing or narrowing down your concepts towards components or parts of that model and adding them together into some kind of framework. There are many resources out there for doing that. You can just be creative and do it spontaneously and you will see that you can came up with interesting designs and schemes that could explain what you are talking about. I for one use a notes app and through that I have a lot of models that I explained to others and it makes it easier to keep track of them also cause I forget what I say. Besides that it allows me to always built up on my models because I have them somewhere for future reference. So I recommend being more organized in your presentation of your concepts and forming models is a step in the right direction. You can discard my suggestion I don't mind. But I'm feeling in the same boat as well in terms of my own discoveries and I want to keep a close eye on your journey and ultimately how those ideas could coalesce together into something perhaps revolutionary. Perhaps a new paradigm. There's many possibilities from here but if they can't be fully modeled those ideas are there but then disappear. You have to put them somewhere to remain there and give them form. So that is my suggestion for refining your process and approach. That's all I have to say for now. Your videos are perhaps one of the most captivating on the philosophy channels that I watched and very original which I appreciate.

[@HokkuOffline]

i agree about "the light at the end of the tunnel" and only being able to pass the singularity when you pass... 💜

[@crowley3015]

man your life in front of you is what your life is and what your life will ever be find love man not this this is all bullshit bro LOVE and FORGIVENESS is all that matters, even at the highest level of the "singularity" as possible, that's all that matters man. Love go find love man and if you did good on you

[@chromakey84]

You’re inside it, objectless and formless. Outside you are all form… Look for yourself and see if it’s true. Padmasabava taught this very well.

[@CouchDoritos]

And what lies beyond the singularity? The beginning. Birth. Creation. The singularity is just a necessary property of the cosmic cycle of Consciousness. The singularity preserves the illusion that it isn't a cycle and there is intrinsic meaning to being. But there is no meaning. Just a story that Consciousness convinces itself is meaningful.

[@AnnonymousPrime-ks4uf]

Singularity represents entropy. How is entropy related to meaning? I rather say that the origin and centropy as well as functional information is related to meaning.

[@KayriM18]

I highly recommend looking into Tyler Goldstein's Theory of Every0ne. He has a youtube channel where he explains in detail his theory of..... everything. Perhaps a nice topic for a video in the future Thanks

[@ReadNames]

We're on a constant march through time, constantly finding out. Our relationship between our singularity is also like the physical limitations of our brain to create reality up to our singularity. Perhaps there are beings of higher power than humans with greater capacity to create reality, but there will always be a singularity of some sort I'd think

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

A singularity represents hidden information. I Mentioned in my previous video on free will that other planes would have thier own versions of hidden information. Whether they are singularities or not is the question. It would be a different dimensional version of it

[@TeddyLinux]

Viscerally aware and equally as uncomfortable about how much I was thinking about something around one's concept of the black hole earlier today. I see that this is the raw uncut stuff right off the space ship

[@mr.gummie3472]

I think that if you were able to perceive these higher dimensions you would still find singularities, like you said its an infinite fractal where you can zoom in infinitely, but you can also zoom out infinitely. So every point of view would probably have their own singularity. I suppose the only way to really percive these singularities is to somehow become one? I dont know how that would work though.

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

I stated in my previous video on free will that I think each “dimension” has its own version of unknowns. Whether or not those manifest as singularities, I don’t know. It would be their version of a singularity.

[@skylesai]

really cool video

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

Thanks a lot

[@Erioletheonecanolie]

Eri the ripe fairy say hey to all the berries the planted with her singularities :))))) hi cassidy lol just keep singing the song of silence 😮

[@borissirob5788]

Have you ever checked out maharishi mahesh yogis talks on youtube? your videos kind of remind me of some of his talks.

[@1300wavy]

With him breaking this down like this, is the earth flat ?

[@mr.gummie3472]

do animals perceive different dimensions? Do ducks perceive the duck dimension?

[@TortoiseInterference]

They are probably wearing the duck headset version of reality that only has duck gauges on it.. so, who can know.

[@CouchDoritos]

They perceive to the level of their understanding. A dog does not understand technology and so does not perceive anything born of technology as we do. While a dog might be able to open a door, that doesn't mean it perceives a handle that opens the door.

[@CouchDoritos]

A singularity is in my humble opinion a discontinuity in the stream of Consciousness. For instance, if Consciousness was watching the PoV of someone driving to the store and then the film suddenly cut to the PoV of a different character in the film, then that cut would be a singularity. A singularity is the break of continuity of the perceived reality that Consciousness witnesses. Sleeping or being knocked out are not singularities but Death is.

[@ThirdEyeTyrone]

Or in other words, It is the end of perception.

[@user-dv4vl9kn8k]

I’d there a discord or community I can join? Please

[@Ricardo-kayu]

👏👏👏🙏

[@davecampbellknowledgeleader]

Expressions expressions expressions… so here’s my global leadership challenge ready? Vision Regenerative reality and Mission public trust. To attain it. A high creed is needed. I found it also in a stretchy anagram creeds of non able oops I mean the cedars of Lebanon. So now putting it to leaders as the 28th amendment draft. Explore cuz we are now cocreating an Aquarius university. You’ll get it. We the people baby! Interdependence is the end of the singularity

[@crowley3015]

You guy's don't want to know what's on the other side, stop now while u have the chance damnit I should have never done this I did this this is 100% my fault and my own doing, I am sorry.

[@the_oni_desdenova]

Nothing hidden still you fail to see the truth they call it they call it planck star i call it angel.by amun ra i am sagittarius a star.

[@sinivesive1630]

You are the loosest screw in the machine bro. Making it malfunction. Get hold of yourself and go to army or something. ❤😂 jk Thanks for keeping the videos at perfect lenght. 👌🏻

[@sagishalit715]

me

[@user-ni7my6ht1g]

〰️♒️🌀♾️