In this video I address the issues and factors of placing a bike engine into a car. Is it a good idea or not ?
Пікірлер: 50
@oleran45693 ай бұрын
That was an excellent presentation! Especially the torque segment.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@gjgeurts93723 ай бұрын
That torque story was only half of it. It's not what the engine makes but what actually gets to the wheels. The bike engine can run a much shorter final gearing, in fact double the reduction that the car engine can because of its double width power band. So back wheel thrust will be about equal.
@johnfotakis35883 ай бұрын
Excellent video once again. Thanks and keep them coming. In your calculations 11000 was the right answer. 4 x 2750. ( not 2250). Pass on my regards to Old Rusty 😁
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
You are correct, I need to go back to school... should never edit a video at night .....lol
@jessevisser5753 ай бұрын
Long time watcher, first time commenting. Horsepower is a measure of total work done over time. To get it, we multiply the torque by the rpm (oversimplified). this is why an engine which generates less force (torque) per power stroke, makes up for it by having more power strokes. When you used a longer bar on the bolt, you DID increase the force, but you also increased the distance travelled, so the total amount of work performed was the same. This is the basic principle of mechanical advantage.
@planesofpaper3 ай бұрын
This was a great video. I have a Lotus 7 and I went with a Toyota Beams 3sge. Some days I wonder if a Suzuki Hyabusa engine would be better. Your video helped me remember that I am on track and there are advantages to the car engine. Your explanation about torque and Short and long stroke helped me understand. I also have to keep in mind that torque feels nice. When the throttles open wide and the engine pulls strong from a low rpm for a long time it feels nice. Thanks again. Rex in New Zealand.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
My pleasure and thanks for watching. I also do enjoy torque at mid and low RPM's. Enjoy your racing
@malama2553 ай бұрын
That was a very nice and detailed video. I finally understand the difference between a car engine and a bike engine. Thanks Steve.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@80AFT24 күн бұрын
I found your channel today and boy I love your detailed videoes! Keep up the exellent work 😊 all the best from Atle from Norway
@search4orlife3 ай бұрын
Great video, very interesting comparison. I run in the F1000 series here in the UK, we run mostly gsxr 1000s and car and engine weigh 320kg.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Indeed, and that works like a champ... Did you ever race against a FF 2000 ? on a track and how did that end up ? Of course yours is fast due to the HP/weight ratio
@finnguitars98693 ай бұрын
Clear explanation Stephan! A small addition to this video: a short stroke can also be applied if the overall weight of the vehicle is low. A low mass needs less torque to accelerate. Therefore, a choice can be made to give a sporty motorcycle engine a short stroke rather than keeping the dimensions of the engine in check. Keep up the good work!
@iankirwan81563 ай бұрын
That was an excellent comparison Steve, thank you for sharing your knowledge and experience.
@briangrant24262 ай бұрын
Great explaination about torque!
@marchutchings88343 ай бұрын
Thank you for a very thought provoking video. I initially thought a motorcycle engine gave formula 1 technology to the car, but your well explained problems/benefits video is most useful. Thanks again and best regards Marc. Australia.
@jamesjohn94603 ай бұрын
Firstly ,the obvious choice for a car due its weight is the Hyabusa. A little smaller in capacity than the car engine but with no modification considerably more powerful with added benefit of torque that is needed for the greater weight of the car. Smaller high revving engines simply don’t have the torque to do the job.
@m.b.smoshitoa83253 ай бұрын
Eish Steve, I have to watch this video 3 to 4 times before commenting. Informative but my mind sometimes slips. Eish Moshitoa south Africa
@CBCycles3 ай бұрын
Very interesting video, thank you! I wonder what the result would be if both race cars had a car engine, but one of the engines was oversquare and revved very high. So all things being equal except for bore/stroke ratio.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comments, well one would have more horse power, but the torque will be relatively less. Here is an approximate assessment based on a simple calculation: CAR A - 300HP at 20000 RPM, CAR B -150HP at 5000 RPM. Results in Torque: CAR A= 106Nm CAR B= 213 Nm Of course that is engine torque , wheel torque will depend on many things (diff ratio, gearbox ratio and gear). The track type etc...Lots of acceleration due to turns and breaking requires torque to accelerate.. Long straights, are less demanding...
@stephenfrench44173 ай бұрын
Thanks for a very interesting and well presented video with great analytics
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@nick45063 ай бұрын
what a bike engine conversion does is replace a lot of the old hard to find racing specific parts. dont think many bike conversions happen from a good running race cars but from ones that are blown up or have been canibalised to fix other cars. in that way its a cost-effective if labor-intensive way of getting a car back on track. that it is somewhat competitive is just a bonus. also you can have fun with the bikes aftermarket. clutches are also a problem for motorcycle and atv drag racers so there are after market solutions like lockup clutches and recluse torque drives. something to look out for the extra strain on the clutch in a car will definitely shorten the life of the clutch baskets, the metal clutch plates digging into the aluminum makeing them not slide freely and hanging up, causes irregular clutch plate wear and slipping. there's lots of replacements its just something to check. 140hp is no where near where bikes top out. ktm 1190 and 1290 motors are dry sump thin v twin engines that should be easier to package in the cars frame, also 160-180 hp depending on model.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comments, and yes there are special bike engines that overcome most of the challenges as you stated in your write up.
@54mgtf223 ай бұрын
Always interesting. Thanks Steve 👍
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@General8133 ай бұрын
Hi Steve, interesting video, very well explained👍🙋
@search4orlife3 ай бұрын
I suppose being race cars the most important consideration is which one is quicker?
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Yes, and both engine types have their Merritt. Pending the track and use
@slartibartfast26493 ай бұрын
8:10 5500/2=2750, so 11,000 labor strokes per minute was correct 👍
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
yes, you are right...
@jccreszMinecraft3 ай бұрын
You might like to know of SuperFastMatt who did exactly this with a honda s600, installed a bike engine in it.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Yep, and thanks for the comments
@scattkiwiman26 күн бұрын
interesting. Would be nice, a bike engine with a rotrex compressor
@the0leman2 ай бұрын
horsepower is how 'fast' you hit the wall. Torque is how 'far' you take that wall with ya.
@richardporter62013 ай бұрын
Did the Smart car originally have a bike engine, 3 cylinder? I saw a German ytube where a highly tuned bike engine was placed in a Smart Car and it was fast on the autobahn.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
yes, that is very well possible... Bike engines are powerfull....
@blatopasteka20153 ай бұрын
Great video! Which one is faster on track ?
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Well on a small track with lots of turns, the car engine was faster, less shifting and better torque. On another track that can be completely different
@JamesParus3 ай бұрын
I have gs with the same engine. It has no water. Just oil and aircooled.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Indeed....
@DirkWrightxyzАй бұрын
The bike engine car is much more like F1 than the car engine one. Of course it's going to be harder to drive. I mean, you're not making a fair comparison either. 1400 cc vs. 900 is not fair. Put a Hyabusa 1300 engine into that other car, and put a diff in there as well. I bet that will make a huge difference for you.
@robot7973 ай бұрын
and what if I put a industrial rotary in a car?
@robertoburromiapanino26593 ай бұрын
5500 divided by 2 is 2250???!!! Not in Australia mate!
@_Nobody_Special3 ай бұрын
Hayabusa engine enters the chat.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
Yes, absolutely...
@irritablearchitect3 ай бұрын
That's 2750 for the car engine, not 2250.
@D3Sshooter3 ай бұрын
yes, indeed goofed up.. Happens when editing late at night. well spotted
@guillermocarrillo39593 ай бұрын
Why do people keep saying R.P.M.’S, when it’s just R.P.M. ?