Dr. Keanu Sai: Update on the Status of Hawaiʻi under International Law Accountability for War Crimes

[@Ipufordays]

Ea!!!! Long live the Hawaiian Kingdom and her people

[@nohea9936]

forever and ever..Hawaii is ours..Jehovah gave us Hawaii not America.

[@DavidSiliga333]

💯 % ABSOLUTELY FACT!!! ❤😊🎉

[@johnthomasdesign]

Mahalo for shedding light on the reality of the situation. I applaud your diligence Dr. Sai.

[@DavidSiliga333]

💯 % ABSOLUTELY FACT!!! ❤😊🎉

[@user-nr4hq2fo1b]

Thank you DR. Sai. God bless all Hawaiian people and the islands of Hawaii.

[@JPLTOA01]

powerful stuff. Mahalo Dr. Sai!

[@anitamendez116]

I love this Man! I have known for years (because of following Dr Sai’s studies) that the illegal occupation of Hawai’i WILL COME TO AN END! Hawai’i No ka oi.

[@michaelkliesch7611]

I have followed dr Sai’s work as well. I have pointed out the facts he uncovered to friends and nobody believes it! It’s true that one person can change the world! God bless you Dr Keanu Sai for getting the truth out! He is an inspiration to both myself and many other people I’m sure!

[@anitamendez116]

@@michaelkliesch7611 People don’t believe us when we tell them about this because they have been brainwashed through 3 generations. That is pretty deep brainwashing. They will believe it when the Illegal Occupancy ENDS!

[@scriptedreality-i1t]

Hawaii will never be an independent kingdom ever again. Your royal family sold you out.hawaii is too strategically important. The only negative about Hawaii is its inhabitants,which should have went the way of the native Americans. I am hopeful that we can get that done in the future. By now,the people that need to see it,have seen the disrespect and racism ,and hatred displayed by locals. They don't appreciate anything and deserve nothing.

[@daYELLOWflashHOKAGE]

Knowledge is power thanks doc awesome presentation keep up the good work 🤙

[@JAHsh077]

Thank you for your efforts ! This overview is so helpful in seeing what needs to be done for justice .

[@charleslacaden]

What a uplifting update!!!

[@ahupuaapunaokauai702]

Mahalonui for your assistance in this great knowledge you have provided!!

[@magdelenedomut1433]

Praise God!Amen! Keanu Sai for bring awareness of what is happening now 🙌 👏 Thank you for your intelligence and for bring hope for Hawaii and people of Hawaii. My ❤ gose out to you and family 👪 and all you do shall be remembered in history. So that all nations know are being accomplished 😊 God bless Hawaii and The Hawaiian Kingdom constitution law ❤ it's unquestionable to protect all Hawaiians( lands)and our independence of Hawaii.

[@darrenkamalu9047]

Mahalo Keanu I was sued by a major mortgage company circa 2003. They sued me in Federal Court in Utah. My response went to jurisdiction that they should have over a Hawaiian living in Hawaii. The judge went quiet and after 3 years of back and forth between me and the mortgage company (judge said nothing) the case was dropped.

[@aaronsoule8484]

This is critical!! Mahalo Keanu!!

[@PracticalPerry]

I am not an attorney, but I did go to law school and I work in the legal arena. Under the U.S. Constitution, International Law is federal law. ; ) Thank you Dr. Sai.

[@thomasmaughan4798]

"Under the U.S. Constitution, International Law is federal law." This is where you cite the article in which this is so. [Hint: there isn't one] The United States is sovereign from international law, just as some Hawaiians are seeking independence from United States law.

[@PracticalPerry]

@@thomasmaughan4798 u misunderstood and misstate what I said. U will need to go to law school.

[@PracticalPerry]

@@thomasmaughan4798 You will need to take International Law class like I did in law school. Your reply is inaccurate and misleading. You also misunderstand and misapply the facts I stated.

[@thomasmaughan4798]

@@PracticalPerry " You will need to take International Law class like I did in law school. " It sort of irrelevant.

[@thomasmaughan4798]

@@PracticalPerry "misapply the facts I stated." Nothing in a youtube comment is a fact. Of course that does not imply untruth. Rather, everything here is a *claim* so I review various sources and I have decided that whatever else is said and done, it is not clear how someone can just decide that he's the "Regent" of the kingdom of Hawaii. I mean, why not be King? But I suppose the guy ought to at least LOOK Hawaiian.

[@russbutton9347]

What a detailed and clear statement of history, international law and declaration of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Well done. What is not yet clear to me is where this is all supposed to lead to. What does the world look like with Hawaiʻi as an independent kingdom? How does that affect commerce and industry here? What happens to the American military presence? How are the islands to be defended? I would like to see what the vision of an independent Hawaiian Kingdom looks like.

[@thomasmaughan4798]

"What does the world look like with Hawaiʻi as an independent kingdom?" Essentially identical to what the world looks like with Samoa as sort of an independent kingdom. "How are the islands to be defended?" War canoes, probably. People have relatively short memories. Someone will occupy Hawaii. Indeed, prior to Kamehameha, wars fought between the islanders. It would likely revert to inter-island warfare. The strongest wins. At the time, it was Kamehameha. Then came the Europeans. The Japanese! If I remember right, there's two or three times more Japanese descended people on Oahu as ethnic Hawaiians.

[@gtrs4ever]

don't think the Democrats are going let this happen! Thank you, Dr. Sai, for bring this crime to light!

[@wasabiginger6993]

Henchmen for the Oligarch's CIA are pushing their NWO plans extra hard now ... starting with the Lahaina Massacre & speedy implementing of smart technology.

[@c.kainoabugado7935]

That's not positive thinking and sounds like that's your desire💯 your use of the law of attraction here sucks!

[@HIKD1843]

Politicians and officials names being added to the international War Report.... it's not a matter of letting it happen. None of these guys gonna be able to travel without risk of arrest. Wait till one tries to vacation out of the country and is never heard from again 😂, I bet everyone be singing a different tune then. Lmao we gonna see all the fake patriots start singing.

[@KainoaKealoha-rr6ev]

Haha! Neither democrats nor republicans have anything to do with international affairs

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

I think you’re misunderstanding what’s going on here… we aren’t going to ask the US or their political parties to end their unlawful occupation, neither dems or reps are going to have a say. This is a matter of international law (inter = between, national = nations) and must be settled in that arena.

[@HomeMadePowa]

THANK YOU KEANU SAI AND LEON SIU

[@kanakamaoli4108]

Leon Siu speaks of colonization. Dr. Sai speaks of occupation. These are not the same and of these two people, only one person has done anything for Hawai’i and it’s not Leon Siu

[@sandramorey2529]

It just goes to show how very important history is. In 4th grade we learned about the Mission Indians and the army forts, but we really didn't learn anything about the treaties and stuff like that. we made salt & flour maps. All very cutsie and nothing about the massacres of Indians. What I learned I learned from just a few books and films. I knew something was fishy about Hawaii, but until I heard you speak at Onipa'a a few years back, I had no idea. Thanks for the update. What will Hawaii do about Obama's presidency?

[@anitamendez116]

Obama’s Mother was a United States Citizen which automatically makes Obama a United States Citizen, No Matter Where He Is Born. Good example: United States Military Children (who are born to parents who are United States Citizens) are born all over the world. Are they NOT U.S. Citizens? No…they are born to United States Citizens which makes the child, automatically, a United States Citizen.

[@thomasmaughan4798]

"What will Hawaii do about Obama's presidency?" In retrospect, nothing.

[@makaalastone9061]

Aloha from Pu'u Honua O Pi'iholo, Maui Nei, HK/SMK! Truly, a very beautifully laidout, concise, historically accurate - presentation, perfectly presented! AS FAR AS IT GOES! Remember, "UA MAU KE EA O KA AINA I KA PONO - O IESU KRISTO!" Without that last phrase, "O IESU KRISTO/OF JESUS CHRIST!" All your years of the wonderful work you and your wonderful "Ekalesia" has done for decades, will be for naught! So, PLEASE, give credit where it is due! UA LAWA MAKOU I KA POHAKU, I KA AI KAMAHA'O O KA AINA!" Your friend and brother in Christ, Maka'ala Stone

[@nohea9936]

Yes indeed glory to Jehovah who created Hawaii for the Hawaiian people. The Hawaiians could have landed their canoes anywhere in this world but God gave the Hawaiians the Hawaiian islands. So beautiful, so loved and protected by Jehhovah from major storms. Now its time we get all pagan idol worshippers out of Hawaii to honor Jehovah.

[@makaalastone9061]

@@nohea9936 Aloha Nohea, as we both know not all Hawaiians are Hawaiians! The individual, regardless of "race/koko," must be born again as a "living stone" to enter the Hawaiian Kingdom 2.0! The Lord of His Vineyard is at the door and will soon destroy those wicked men who are destroying His Aina, AND His people - who love Him AND keep His Commandments! John 14: 15. Your friend and brother in Christ, Maka

[@nohea9936]

@@makaalastone9061 I enjoyed your reply. Its Gods timing the Hawaiian Kingdom will be successful. Dr Sai is in Gods timing. The current Govt in Hawaii dared us to takeover. It will happen our King Kamehameha III prophesied our takeback "Ua Mau ke Ea o ka ʻĀina i ka Pono'" is the end to the Japanese Supremacy in the Hawaii State govt. The key word is righteousness and since Statehood, Jehovahs righteouness was stomped on by the Japanese Supremacy, and so were Jehovahs Hawaiian people. Now we have new buildings being built Thats favor and blessings from our most high God,

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

@@makaalastone9061 You are misspelling Hawaiian, there is no ‘okina (‘) in it as it’s an English word… proof of that is that words do not end in a consonant in ‘ōlelo Hawai’i.

[@makaalastone9061]

@@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom Aloha and thank you for the correction😔, of course, will do. Your friend and brother in Christ.

[@HowardCurtis-j1u]

I agree with you and have felt this way for years. My mom and dad left California for Honolulu in 1941 when my dad got hired to work for the Star Bulletin. After the war broke out, my dad joined the Navy and my mom worked for the Army Corps of Engineers. During an R&R, my dad came home and my mother became pregnant with me. She was supposed to leave Hawai’i and go back to the US and had a ticket to fly out on PanAm, but I came one month early and was born in Kapiolani Maternity Hospital the morning before her flight. Though I am “ha’ole” and brought up in California, I feel I am more Hawai’ian than American, and for years have considered Hawai’i an occupied country. So, I really appreciate and am grateful for your presentation.

[@liliuokalani7064]

Love your story! Mahalo nui for your support! You are a keiki o ka 'āina 😃💯

[@maggiemconnor]

Keiki o ka aina!!! ❤ child of the land!

[@c.kainoabugado7935]

Politically EVERYONE born in these Hawaiian Islands, H. I. are considered Hawaiian Islands subjects and nationals. USA specified in the admission of the State of Hawaii they would NOT CONFER US nationality in Sect19 of the 1959 Admissions Act of the State of Hawaii. You're a national of the Hawaiian Islands country that began 1843 owned by the Kanaka Maoli. See the Kingdom office in Hilo on Hawaii Island 🤙🏾

[@HowardCurtis-j1u]

@@c.kainoabugado7935 Thank you! I like to think that I surprised my mother and came a month early, before she could fly back to the US, because I wanted to be a Hawai'ian, not an American. But, I guess because both parents were born in the USA, I am both.

[@c.kainoabugado7935]

@@HowardCurtis-j1u well, then I will say it depends on which law you are obeying, at the moment can't do both, just cuz how they are written. In Hawaiian Islands the law does not honor dual nationality & in USA Hawaiian Islands are not on the dual anything list. We have subjects not citizens and a constitutional monarchy not a Republic BIG differences the US gov't & media loves to NOT mention or remind anyone of. On Kingdom side your status is Kanaka Hawaii. On US side your status is USA citizen of the state of Hawaii but not USA national by congressional act. You should claim the country that claims you entirely. The foreign parents status is separate from you in Hawaiian Islands law. The Hawaiian Islands law gives your birth Rights of the Soil>land use. There's a Kingdom Attorney General's ofc in Hilo, go see it.

[@CliffRoyal]

Mahalo nui loa e te rangatira Dr.Keanu Sai, E tu mai nei akeake te mana o Hawaaii, @ 1.00 Polish Journal Review, if I was attending your update after speaking to their review I would have given you and all contributors a standing ovation...The uri tangata o Te Ika a Maui acknowledge and recognize the Nation-State and Kingdom of Hawaaii ...Mauriora

[@zigizigizat]

Mahalo for all your efforts! Hawaii will always have my support

[@WE.ARE138]

Thank you for putting this out there. So if everyone just said that they aren't incorporated by the US what could happen?

[@WE.ARE138]

And I'm not just asking about Hawaii but folks in the stolen mainland as well.

[@KainoaKealoha-rr6ev]

It's a different situation with Hawaiʻi. See Hawaiʻi is an independent State that is being belligerently occupied by the US as Hawaiʻi (specifically the Hawaiian Kingdom became an independent State with recognition of Great Britain and France on November 28, 1843 and then by the US in 1844. What happened took place in america with native americans is that they were consumed by colonization. Hawaiʻi wasn't colonized by the US but instead the US committed the war crime of usurpation of sovereignty but hid it by lying to the world that Hawaiʻi was colonized. No Hawaiʻi is occupied by the US and has been since 1893

[@WE.ARE138]

@@KainoaKealoha-rr6ev yes that's what I've learned after watching this I looked into a few things and learned alot, like how we "purchased" Alaska from Russia. Thank you for breaking it down further ✌️God bless the Hawaiians and unfortunately the others that have been bamboozled for far too long. At least we know people are waking up and we're not alone in dealing with the tyranny. Stay safe, strong and vigilant.🙏

[@thomasmaughan4798]

@@WE.ARE138 "like how we "purchased" Alaska from Russia." Yes; it is the same as a quit-claim deed or "fee simple" which is a thing in Hawaii but pretty much nowhere else. Russia quit its CLAIM on Alaska. Alaska is still there; it isn't going anywhere. What exists are CLAIMS. If you buy land in Hawaii, fee simple, everyone else quits their claims. The land isn't going anywhere (we hope). However, you obtain title only so far as whoever MIGHT make a claim, could still make a claim, and THAT person has not quit the claim. It would be an overwhelming mess impossible to resolve so generally speaking, this sort of legal activity is just someone's hobby. How exactly does the Kingdom of Hawaii have title to its land? Hmm? It doesn't. It is a CLAIM. Claiming the entire island chain, every square inch of it; and the citizens owned *nothing* .

[@chardaerieman662]

A fantastic presentation, the greatest example of Hawaiian stewardship.

[@mailove4Jah]

HULI 🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽

[@TaraMaliaTV]

Mahalo for the work you are doing.

[@HIKD1843]

🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾

[@DavidSiliga333]

💯 % ABSOLUTELY FACT!!! ❤😊🎉

[@hankakah4180]

Exactly what i have been telling other people. The parallels between Hawaii and Ukraine are similar. Americans asked for military help to protect them from the Hawaiian government. The USA sent in their marines and occupied Hawaii. Russians asked for military help to protect them from the Ukrainians. Putin sent in his military and occupied Ukraine. The majority of Western countries around the world led by the USA have spent $Billions to help the Ukrainians keep their sovereignty The USA should be pressured by all these Western countries to accept International law. Hawaiians have lost in 132 years their culture, their people, their lands, their Sovereignty. As in a lot of countries, you are NOT allowed to buy land if not a citizen. What lands that were STOLEN needs to be given back to the Hawaiians. Someone steals something and sells it, the new owner is still charged with receiving stolen property! STOP THE STEAL! THEN LET THE HAWAIIANS HEAL and recover before all is lost forever!

[@barbarapetersen4624]

This sentence makes no sense! Please read and adjust what you're really trying to say. I also believe your commens about Ukraine are completely wrong.

[@hankakah4180]

@barbarapetersen4624 How so? Russians living in the 3 Ukrainian territories were aided with military equipment, guns, men to help them take over Ukraine while Russia Annexed them and claimed they were now.part of Russia. Ukraine is now trying to retake their lands stolen and occupied by Russia and Russians who moved there.

[@Jon-go6be]

​@@barbarapetersen4624 Let the Hawaiians heal. If this makes no sense to you? Obviously some peeps need Jesus. Aloha

[@riptideHI]

The lions share of the land was sold by the Ali’i to the sugar barons before American occupation. Unfortunately, even if the Kingdom is restored, the land isn’t magically being redistributed its citizens.

[@tawaitai]

Fake News🎯

[@cochisenahuh7939]

Keanu sai gives me hope. He is doing the Lord's work. Mahalo loa!

[@joyt.y.8669]

Interesting how many skeptics are being triggered with this here in comments. Sleepless nights are certain for these names held accountable in this historical war crime message. Mahalo Nui Dr Keanu Sia. God bless you your ohana & hui.

[@bronnieespania3306]

This was the comment I was looking.

[@kaikahakua]

God bless you Dr. Keanu Sai

[@jorgesegura8044]

Good man ...glad we have many working out the tics out here ! All is Not what it seems, maaaany out here have been learning . It seems last 23 years, were faaaar more than what any public schools put out under std books being printed for teachers and students...m

[@kavikagoda]

Incredible Ike here. I would love to sit with him and talk story. Once Hawaii is no longer occupied, who are considered Hawaiian citizens ? All who are living in Hawaii? All of Kanaka descendants? All born in Hawaii? It is an amazing and exciting time for Kanakas and locals in Hawaii. It has been a long time! Hoihoi I ka piko ka poe no Hawaii nei !

[@The.Adept.Chamber]

Ua Mau Ke Ea

[@KoleaAkau-yn2wk]

Aloha can we get a transcript of this video? Mahalo

[@thomasmaughan4798]

You can click "show transcript" and then copy and paste it where ever you would like.

[@nomadhues8606]

How does one collect a government check as an educator while simultaneously attempting to separate from that same government?

[@marydrayer2792]

Pray one day that these facts will be taught in all schools. Not only Hawaiʻi - but all (illegally) occupied nations.

[@smason3541]

God Bless the Kingdom of Hawaii! Hawaiians realizing how intelligent Queen Liliʻuokalani really was! She made sure her people didn’t lose their lands! Take it back!

[@kanakshion]

Aloha Dr. Sai! still no kingdom government revised? as all need to restore our kingdom

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

There IS a Hawaiian Kingdom government, Dr Sai is the interim regent of that government and was recognized as such by the PCA in The Hague and the UN. The government as a whole needs to follow the Hawaiian Constitution to be re-established after the occupation comes to an end. Which is why he is the “interim” regent, which is a temporary figure until a permanent one can take over.

[@kanakshion]

@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom And what he need twenty years mo? he not doing nothing but kukakuka?

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

@@kanakshion And what are YOU doing?! It’s because of him that so many people are aware of the illegal occupation. It’s because of him that the NLG has released a resolution in support of the Hawaiian Kingdom AND has a subcommittee solely dedicated to aiding the Hawaiian Kingdom. It’s because of him that the IADL passed a resolution on support of the Hawaiian Kingdom. It’s because of him that the PCA in The Hague acknowledged the continued existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom. If you think you can do better, give it a go, otherwise don’t criticize someone for doing what you’re not willing or capable of doing.

[@kanakshion]

​@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom and what? still no can buy homes, neva get the kingdom back? no mo the House of Nobles and The house of Representatives? which is the kingdom government of 1893? I no see dat? as usual , kukakuka!

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

@@kanakshion Like I said, if you think you can do better, do it. YOU’RE the one that’s all kūkākūkā, HE isn’t only talking, he’s doing… YOU are the one that’s all waha. But since you don’t agree with him, you’re welcome to move to the US, rather than reaping the rewards of HIS efforts when the occupation ends.

[@atadamascomusic]

My grandparents are turning in their graves!!! It is many years of emotions pouring out like wax....kuluwaimaka!!

[@Haiza318]

What is MG Kenneth Hara afraid of? Both generals, McArthur and Eisenhower used Japanese laws to govern over Japan and German laws to govern Germany, respectively, were they ever charged with treason?

[@jasonpaz]

My college professor and HIKI No vet! Believe it or not he was A very strict Officer.

[@PAKALOLOBANDIT]

I WAS ATOUR GUIDE ON OAHU AND EVRYDAY I WAS NARATING ABOUT THE OVERTHROUGH OF THE KINGDOM OF HAWAII AND ALWAYS FELT THAT WE AS HAWAIIAN PEOPLE WERE ROBBED NOT ONLY OF OUR LAND BUT ALSO OF OUR CULTURE I ALSO HAD NO REAL KNOWLEDGE OF IT AND HAD TO DO RESEARCH CAUSE AS DR. KEANU SAI MENTIONED I OR WE WERE NEVER TAUGHT IT IN SCHOOL

[@thomasmaughan4798]

"ROBBED NOT ONLY OF OUR LAND" Unless you were alii, it was never YOUR land.

[@PAKALOLOBANDIT]

@@thomasmaughan4798 you sound like one missionary

[@thomasmaughan4798]

@@PAKALOLOBANDIT "you sound like one missionary" Thank you! I never was a missionary.

[@firekaialii]

So what is the regency going to do because they are the one that represents the Hawaiian kingdom I know it just knowledge for inform people but what are we going to do?

[@saraharellano9399]

Interesting the process was interrupted by the intentional plasma fires.

[@dorthymcbride3384]

Each one of the hawaiian blood natives deserves land now! Our elders died without their aina in their ahupua'a. We are dissappearing! NOW IS THE TIME THIS GOVERNMENT AWARD ALL HAWAIIAN NATIVES LAND AND RIGHTS TO LIVE OFF OF OUR LANDS!

[@maggiemconnor]

Courts have used term 'co-equal sovereign' to United States. Imagine what that means.

[@guyinthesky6696]

Economic displacement of currently 2/3 of Kanaka Maoli throughout the world is also a war crime.

[@4gleason129]

Makes me wonder if this was anything to do with the Japanese reasoning behind the " attack on pearl harbor".

[@OperationHawaiiana]

the japanese didn't attack pearl harbor to attack hawai'i in general. they were directly attacking the US army

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

I saw something years ago that said Japan admitted that part of their reasoning for choosing Pearl Harbor was to help their Hawaiian friends get freedom from the US tyrants.

[@GitzenShiggles]

Fantasy is fun!

[@Joey-uz9zj]

Yessssah

[@mathieust-louis2893]

Super interesting, but my question is can you apply laws and declarations retroactively? A lot of the war crime declarations cited are from the 20th century while the overthrow of the Hawaiian Monarchy was in the 19th century. Furthermore, another question I’d like to ask is once the US ordered its forces to no longer interfere in Hawaiian matters, than did Hawaii go back to a state of peace? Meaning, at what point is a war considered a civil war vs a war of foreign aggression? Because one ship captain went rogue one time, for a temporary period of time, can that really be used as the only reason for the existence of the provisional government of the Republic of Hawaii? Or was the USS Boston interference a sub event of a larger event (Hawaiian civil war)? Think of the recent Libyan civil war and US interference there for example.

[@KainoaKealoha-rr6ev]

“my question is can you apply laws and declarations retroactively? A lot of the war crime declarations cited are from the 20th century while the overthrow of the Hawaiian Monarchy was in the 19th century.” There is no statute of limitations of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes that were committed. “another question I’d like to ask is once the US ordered its forces to no longer interfere in Hawaiian matters, than did Hawaii go back to a state of peace?” Hawaiʻi will return back to a state of peace when a treaty of peace is established between the Hawaiian Kingdom and the US “Meaning, at what point is a war considered a civil war vs a war of foreign aggression?” Hawaiʻi never became apart of the US, so this isn’t a civil war. What has taken place is the US has been concealing the war between the Hawaiian Kingdom and US and portraying Hawaiʻi as if it were a colonial possession. All that has happened is 1898 is that there has been the illegal imposition of american laws within Hawaiian territory. Your own president Grover Cleveland even admitted this when addressing the unauthorized landing of United States troops in the capital city of the Hawaiian Kingdom. President Cleveland stated, “on the 16th day of January, 1893, between four and five o’clock in the afternoon, a detachment of marines from the United States steamer Boston, with two pieces of artillery, landed at Honolulu. The men, upwards of 160 in all, were supplied with double cartridge belts filled with ammunition and with haversacks and canteens, and were accompanied by a hospital corps with stretchers and medical supplies (p. 451).” President Cleveland ascertained that this “military demonstration upon the soil of Honolulu was of itself an act of war, unless made either with the consent of the Government of Hawaii or for the bona fide purpose of protecting the imperiled lives and property of citizens of the United States. But there is no pretense of any such consent on the part of the Government of the Queen, which at that time was undisputed and was both the de facto and the de jure government. In point of fact the existing government instead of requesting the presence of an armed force protested against it (p. 451).” He then stated, “a candid and thorough examination of the facts will force the conviction that the provisional government owes its existence to an armed invasion by the United States (p. 454).”

[@mathieust-louis2893]

@@KainoaKealoha-rr6ev 'There is no statute of limitations of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes that were committed. " I find this hard to believe, where did you find this? Because if you are correct, than everyone all the time would find themselves in perpetual never ending all consuming legal tribunals, Crimes agains humanity by modern standards were committed all through history and everyone at one time or another, even by Hawaiians themselves through different eras. On top of that, the standards change with time. We would obviously need clearly defined standards applicable to specific dates otherwise it becomes completely meaningless. As far as the second question I do not think you understood what I said. All civil wars and rebellions pretty much have a exterior stronger power that tries to influence them. I will use the US war of revolution for a example however there are many more in fact all of them are similar, the rebels were British subjects, they were financed and even militarily aided by the french, with literally war ships, arms, and even manpower. However no one would argue because the French helped the Rebels it would than in turn make the Revolutionary war any less real. USA is not part of Britain today, and Britain can not argue that France participated in the Revolutionary war therefore it is null and voided and the USA should go back to being British. When the Safety Committee rebelled against the Kingdoms monarchy and over threw it, with or without the help of a exterior force, it was in fact a real occurrence, Than the Republic oh Hawaii took over and the Republic actually became international recognized. Therefore making it a recognized nation on the world stage. The Kingdom at which point if I am correct by international law seized to exist in the views of the International community, just like how the British American Colonies seized to exist when the United States Of America became recognized. Of course, the United Kingdom refused to recognize the USA, just like how the Kingdom refused to recognize the Republic of Hawaii, but that's now how any of this works... How can UK say the kingdom of Hawaii exists while at the same time accepting the new existence of the Republic of Hawaii, one voids the other.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

The laws you’re referring to (modern international laws) are simply customary international laws that have been codified. Customary international laws have existed for centuries. Essentially customary international law is a legal “custom” (hence the name) that was in place and practiced. Customary international law is recognized as international law and is just as punishable as modern codified international laws, the difference is rather than proving a codified law was broken, you would provide proof of understanding and use of a customary international law. So for example, the US used a treaty to acquire EVERY state of its union… EXCEPT the Hawaiian Kingdom, where it used a congressional law (a joint resolution) because they couldn’t ratify a treaty, because Hawaiians universally petitioned against annexation… one of the rules of annexation is it has to be willing, the people have a right to self determination, this is why a treaty is needed, it requires BOTH parties to sign it, “not while under duress”. The US’s use of a treaty 49 times before “annexing” the Hawaiian Kingdom through a fraudulent one sided law without jurisdiction over foreign countries, is PROOF that the U.S. knew and understood the legal international “custom” of using treaties for acquisitions of foreign territories.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

_(Continued)_ While you cannot apply modern codified laws retroactively, you CAN apply the customary international laws that modern codified laws were based on. Also, the Hawaiian Kingdom has been occupied for 131 years and counting, so any modern international laws that have been created CAN be applied to crimes committed proactively of those laws being codified. For example, Article 49 of Geneva Convention IV which states that an occupying power may not transport any part of its civilian population into a territory it occupies or any portion of the occupied population out of the occupied territory, CAN be applied proactively of its codification in 1949. So America HAS violated article 49 of Geneva Convention IV, as every American to enter the Hawaiian Kingdom since the codification of article 49 GCIV is in fact a violation… furthermore every Hawaiian subject forcibly removed, say the transport of Hawaiian subject prisoners to prisons in the US for example, is also a violation of art. 49 of GCIV.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

_(continued)_ From my understanding, a state a peace cannot be achieved until there is a treaty of peace signed by both parties, so no. Also, an occupying power is not supposed to pull its troops and order them not to interfere. As occupiers their legal duty was to create a military government to administer the laws of the OCCUPIED country (not their own domestic US laws, that’s a HUGE violation of international law), and then work towards reinstating the overthrown government so that it can govern over itself, then and only then can it pull out its military. Furthermore, Queen Lili’uokalani’s and President Cleveland had an agreement, which was paramount to a treaty, wherein our Queen agreed to not charge the insurgents for their crimes if the U.S. reinstated her and followed the rules of ending an occupation. While our Queen kept her word, Cleveland did not & when he had to leave office, McKinley was legally obligated to carry out the terms of the agreement as well… and every President thereafter as well. *Mind you, I am not a lawyer, legal professional, political scientist or anyone of any authority or expertise to answer these questions, I am simply answering from my understanding of the situation. I do not claim that the opinions and comments I have shared and expressed here to be facts, as they are simply my personal understanding and opinion.* *Rather, I encourage yourself and everyone else to do their own research or seek the aid of a legal professional, to come to your own conclusions.*

[@UnkoHoloHolo]

👏👏🤙

[@wecanwatersports4151]

MEAN THE DOPE 🫵😊

[@hawaiiankingdom4186]

I mua Kakou

[@markgarin6355]

Not sure using the Korean peninsula is a good example, you should know that it's still at war, and I've never heard SOFA mentioned there... Germany yes.

[@kanakamaoli4108]

He does know that. In fact, my country the Hawaiian Kingdom is still in a state of war with the US and had been since 1893, where the US is committing war crimes including usurpation of sovereignty and genocide in the form of denationalization.

[@777NCM]

What happens to property owned by non-Hawaiians. Is it seized and given to Hawaiians? Are non-Hawaiians deported back to the US? Are Hawaiians in the US mainland deported back to Hawaii?

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

1. The US is NOT our mainland. 2. Property: every land sale since 1-17-1893 is the w^% crime of “pillaging” and therefore fraudulent. So yes, of course all lands will be returned to their rightful owners… why would people who “bought” stollen land be allowed to keep those lands?! Essentially what will happen, is non-Hawaiians who “bought” land via a loan, which is the vast majority of people, were required by the lender to pay for title insurance, a title insurance company is supposed to ensure (& insure) that the titles to lands being bought have a clear title. Because these title insurance companies failed to thoroughly investigate that land sales were legit and had clear titles, the title insurance companies will have to pay the “buyers” the amount that was insured, which typically is the purchase price of the home (NOT the current market value). So if you paid a mortgage, you will be able to recoup the money you lost on the purchase by filing a claim with the title insurance company you used… again, you can only recoup the amount you paid for the property, NOT the appreciated current market value, obviously. For someone who paid cash and didn’t get title insurance, you won’t be able to recoup money this way, you would have to file a suit against the US and hope they rule on your favor. Most likely everyone who paid cash will file a joint suit and that could raise the odds of a favorable ruling.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

3. Deportations: Article 49 of Geneva Convention IV states that: _”The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies…”_ …. this means that the US was not supposed to allow its civilian population into the Hawaiians Kingdom (or other foreigners), as such everyone who entered did so unlawfully and is therefore the subject of deportation, yes. It will be the US’s legal obligation to carry out the deportations, not the Hawaiian Kingdoms. 4. All Hawaiians living outside of the Hawaiian Kingdom will have to return or apply for a visa to reside in the country they are currently residing in. The US likely will be legally obligated to pay for the flights and costs associated with repatriating Hawaiians as they are responsible for the diaspora that caused the mass exodus of Hawaiians.

[@777NCM]

@@kokakolagodcomp-vi2yv I wanted to know what you guys thought. Most of the land owned by “foreigners” was acquired legally when Hawaii was independent of the US, right?

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

@@777NCM No, most of the land acquired was done so after the unlawful invasion, unlawful annexation and current unlawful occupation. In attempt to simplify, land in Hawai’i was broken up into 3 categories government lands, crown lands and kuleana lands. Foreigners were only allowed to buy lands that were part of one of those categories, government lands. After the unlawful invasion, annexation and current occupation, America has seized all of those lands… again unlawfully, this is called “pillaging” it’s a violation of international law. Government lands are now called “state lands”, crown lands are now called “ceded lands” (despite us never having ceded those lands) and the rest is kuleana lands which are now just considered private lands (upon fraudulent title holders)… modernly the US claims to own all of it & sells all of it according to US laws (another violation of international law, as an occupying power the US is supposed to administer the laws of the occupied national, the Hawaiian Kingdom). So this means that while foreigners could buy land from government lands before, now after the invasion etc foreigner can buy land from any of the 3 categories, but reliant upon US unlawfully imposed laws, ie zoning laws (agriculture lands, industrial, business, resort, residential etc). Basically previous to the invasion foreigners could only access ownership within ⅓ of the land, now they are able to purchase within 100% of the lands depending on unlawfully imposed US zoning laws. To note: in US Supreme Court ruling for US 253 Foster & Elam vs Neilson, as pertaining to the “Louisiana purchase”, the US Supreme Court ruled that all land issues regarding lands acquired from foreign countries, must be handled according to the agreement of land transactions detailed in the treaty used to acquire those foreign lands… the U.S. never legally acquired the Hawaiian Kingdom, therefore there is no treaty, therefore there is no agreement on how the US can handle land transactions, they have no jurisdiction over our lands as there is no treaty of annexation.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

@@kokakolagodcomp-vi2yv Considering the laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom are not as easy to find online if you don’t know what you’re looking for (these are laws from the 1800’s after all) it’s not beyond the scope of reason that someone would inquire about them, even if for no other reason than to have an idea of where to begin their research.

[@BK-uf6qr]

In fairness, I would like to know what he wants out of this? Usually it’s money, recognition, etc. Is he trying to kick the US out of Hawaii? He seems like he got way too deep. He marinated himself in this. But what’s the end game?

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

Yes, the “end game” is for the US to end its prolonged illegal occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom, deport all non-Hawaiians that they allowed into our country over the last 131 years, leave our country and face international court or the international community to answer for the crimes they’ve committed in the last 131 years, which like all occupations will result in reparations to be paid to the Hawaiian Kingdom and its people, to be determined by international court by the length of the occupation and the crimes committed.

[@jasonwright4222]

No he just wants the wrongs righted, and not every Hawaiian wants to kick all non Hawaiians out

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

@@jasonwright4222 This person didn’t ask about non-Hawaiians, he asked about kicking the US out, which, yes, Interim Regent Sai IS attempting to do that, eventually, AFTER the US conforms to international law. However, while on the topic, non-Hawaiians, meaning people who are not Hawaiian subjects (of any ethnicity), WILL be subject to deportation, the responsibility of which lies upon the US to carry out the deportation of their citizens. The Hawaiian Kingdom does not allow for dual citizenship, anyone who wants to remain here will have to formally and legally relinquish their American citizenship (at a U.S. embassy or consulate) and once verified you will be able to apply for naturalization to the Hawaiian Kingdom when we eventually open up our Kingdom to new citizens (we may not do so immediately, Americans and other foreigns may first need to go through the deportation process and live in their own countries until we open our Kingdom up to new citizens).

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

@@jasonwright4222 Yes we do.

[@kokakolagodcomp-vi2yv]

why wouldn't you want the US out of hawaii? hawaii is not america, never has been, never will be. we hawaiians never wanted to be american. it was forced upon us and unlike the native americans, we hawaiians became the first non-european independent nation. we are not a scattering of tribes like they were and are still today. you know, this mentality you have is why marxism is so appealing to people who have legitimate grievances with euopean people. europeans/americans etc are still holding on to these beliefs that their occupations are right and just which is why the cultural marxist movement, revolution really, is so successful in every european country. honestly, europeans, americans should let go of all these occupied lands and give it back to the native people and europeans should focus on saving their races from extinction. I know I'm assuming you are white and that is because many whites hold this same opinion youve expressed. there is a concerted and successful campaign to replace whites in their own countries, and let me tell you, as a hawaiian, it is the worst thing you can imagine to replaced in your own land. i do not know want this for whites, but this is happening now which is unfortunate but it happened to us hawaiians and it sucks being part of a race experiencing genocide in more than one form. america was a nation built by and for people of european descent. its not a system that benefits or works in hawaii or for hawaiians. a disaster really. we want america to deoccupy our nation, and rent the bases from us or give those lands back to us. repatriate all their citizens back to america and hawaiians back to hawaii. it is the for the best that america deoccupy the kingdom of hawaii.

[@kaleokeliikoa4156]

eō

[@americodiloretto217]

It was very sad what had happen during the late 19th century in Hawaii. But today Hawaii is the tip of the spear for our national security of the United States and the Pacific Ocean by the U.S. military and help keeping the sea lanes open and free from invasions from aggressive hostile foreign forces by using our Military in Hawaii and Guam. China is a bigger threat than ever before, so the military will never go away. So I don't know exactly what Dr. Keanu Sai is trying to do or want with all respect. Also the American government back in the 18th and 19th century had taken over all native lands, and they are all 50 States now with millions of mixed race living in them now, just like Hawaii is now. Just like the Roman Empire or any empire in history, lands have been always been taken and occupied. So, again Dr Sai needs to be clear on what he wants done. I respect Dr. Sai freedom of speech, and what he is some what saying ?, and that the Hawaii State government needs to move much faster by taking care of the local native Hawaiians who are homeless and in need of proper housing ASAP. We are in a different world today and keep loving each other in Aloha Love always as human beings created equally in God's image. John 3:16 (KJV version). God Bless... Very respectfully, Mahalo and Aloha Kind regards.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

Aloha, I’m going to try to explain. First of all you ask what Dr Keanu Sai is trying to do… the answer is he’s trying to get the US to end its illegal occupation of the sovereign Hawaiian Kingdom. To explain this, I want to address something else you said in your comment. You said _”Also the American government back in the 18th and 19th century had taken over all native lands, and they are all 50 states now, with millions of mixed race living in them now, just like Hawai’inis now”_ …… here’s where I believe you are misunderstanding what’s being talked about… you mention the US taking over “all native land”… I’m assuming you’re referring to Native American lands or essentially what we now know as the continental US, but here’s the huge difference… what European colonizers stole from Native Americans was not a country, that’s the distinction. In order to BE considered a country you have to gain international sovereign recognition by other countries agreeing in a treaty that they recognize you AS a country. To do that you have to be United under one leader, have a government, have an infrastructure, have a constitution, have a universal currency, have a healthcare system, a judicial system, be involved in political agreements and pacts with foreign countries… things like that, and essentially conduct yourself AS a country, then get foreign countries to recognize you AS a foreign country by signing a treaty stating that you are a sovereign country. The native Americans didn’t have that when they were colonized. - Who was the ruler the ruler of their country? - What was their country called? - What did their flag look like? - What was in their constitution? - What did their universal currency look like? - What kind of healthcare system did they have? - What countries recognized them as a sovereign country through a treaty? Native Americans had none of that because they weren’t a country. The Hawaiian Kingdom had all of that, we gained international sovereign recognition in 1843 through the Anglo Franco proclamation and our sovereignty was later further solidified when additional countries recognized our sovereignty, including the US. So Native Americans didn’t have a country, so Europeans colonizers were allowed to legally colonize them in accordance to international law. The Hawaiian Kingdom however IS a country, and you CANNOT colonize a sovereign country, that’s illegal, you also can’t forcefully annex a foreign country, BOTH sides have to sign a treaty wherein one side relinquishes its sovereignty to the other, “not while under duress”. There is no treaty of annexation wherein we relinquished our sovereignty to the US or anyone, therefore we CONTINUE to be a sovereign country albeit illegally occupied by the US.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

Dr Sai is very clear about not only what he “wants” but what the US must eventually do in accordance to international law & that’s to deoccupy the sovereign Hawaiian Kingdom. I think what your misunderstanding is the “Native lands” as you’re referring to them, meaning Native Americans Im assuming, were not the sovereign lands of an internationally recognized COUNTRY. The land Europeans stole from Native Americans… what country was that? What was the one leader they were all unified under? What did their constitution say? What did their universal national currency look like? What did their national flag look like? What countries did they participate in international agreements and pacts with? What countries granted them international sovereign recognition? In what year did they gain international sovereign recognition? What was the capitol of their country? What kind of government did they have? The Hawaiian Kingdom, unlike the land that European colonizers stole from Native Americans, is an internationally recognized sovereign country, we gained international sovereign recognition through the Anglo Franco Proclamation in 1843 when Britain and France recognized us AS a sovereign country. Our sovereignty was later further solidified when essentially every country at the time recognized us as a sovereign country, including the US. Unfortunately Native Americans didn’t get the chance to gain sovereignty for themselves and therefore according to international law, it was legal to takeover their lands… legal according to international law, which was created by colonizers to justify their theft of lands, but none the less it’s the law we follow to this day. The Hawaiian Kingdom is a sovereign country, the Native Americans never had a country…. which isn’t to say it was okay to steal from them, it clearly wasn’t and it’s actually illegal now, but nonetheless it was considered legal then… but also not moral. What the US did to the Hawaiian Kingdom however was completely illegal, the US never annexed the Hawaiian Kingdom, therefore we continue to exist as a sovereign country, albeit illegally occupied by the US in the longest running occupation ever.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

Also, you mention the “50 states”… every single state was acquired via a TREATY, because that’s the only legal way to acquire foreign lands… except the Hawaiian Kingdom. The US tried to get us to sign a treaty but we wouldnt and they can’t force us. Instead the US passed a law called a joint resolution to supposedly “annex” the Hawaiian Kingdom against our will, but US laws are domestic to the US, they have no power or jurisdiction beyond its own borders, therefore it can’t annex a foreign country. If countries could pass laws annexing foreign countries against their will, don’t you think Russia or China would have passed a joint resolution annexing the US?!?!?! The Hawaiian Kingdom is not and never has been part of the US. I hope that cleared things up. Take care.

[@kokakolagodcomp-vi2yv]

america will have to rent the land from the kingdom of hawaii like it does in other countries where they have bases. its astounding to me how narrow minded people are. look at what you have just said, you are ok with the genocide and occupation of the hawaiians and their kingdom. i love how americans think they are somehow enemies with china when 90% of everything americans own is made in china. what kind of enemy makes everything you own? your enemy is israel not china. israel is occupying the american government, you should know this by now

[@joyy.706]

Let’s look and see who is discrediting the world court in Switzerland? If one discredits, Keanu Sai are they also discrediting the world court in Switzerland?

[@thomasmaughan4798]

"are they also discrediting the world court in Switzerland?" Yes. It has no legal authority over the United States.

[@julieoliver8170]

Unfortunately there's one thing Keanu it's missing big time. He is using a US person to do business. The only way to be a professor you must be doing business with the field Warehouse receipt. This is a military Warehouse, see lieber code 38, 42-43. You can't be in two places at once. If you are going to claim to be the leader of a kingdom you must be outside of their boundaries. You can't be within their warehouse using their property. See blacks fifth ,field receipt and field Warehouse

[@jasonwright4222]

At what point did he claim to be our leader?

[@julieoliver8170]

@@jasonwright4222 So who is educated enough to lead the kanaka. I haven't ever heard one that has been akamai enough for the job.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

@@julieoliver8170 America is being run by Biden… even a fifth grader is more akamai than Biden… we’ll be fine. Besides, if you’re not Hawaiian, it’s none of your concern.

[@kokakolagodcomp-vi2yv]

​@@julieoliver8170america is being lead around by a president with Alzheimer's, and an entire senate/congress that is beholden to AIPAC/ISRAEL's desires/agenda (effectively occupying DC) while american politicians have adopted a endless vocabulary of cultural marxist terminology and you're judging hawaiians? america is $35 trillion dollars in debt to private banks. america is a failed disaster of nation. all america is now is a ranch between mexico and Canada that grows loyal soldiers for israel

[@thomasmaughan4798]

@@jasonwright4222 "At what point did he claim to be our leader?" The comments on this channel suggest he has many followers.

[@bober1019]

Hawai'i ?wtf

[@joshm.3435]

So if the U.S. pulled out of Hawaii, Hawaii could possibly be treated like Puerto Rico, American Samoa, or Guam if they continued relations with the U.S.? In modern times life isn’t really that great in those places. Especially when you need help. I wonder how life would be here. Opportunities would probably be gone. I think most people would keep their U.S. citizenship and probably move to the mainland U.S. if the U.S. moved out.

[@kanakamaoli4108]

Cognitive dissonance is a real problem for you, isn’t it

[@PrincessRuth-sj6lt]

Dr. Sai are you still self appointed head of regents to the Kingdom? I was shown docs filed in Geneve stating u r head of regents, your wife is treasurer, and an American lawyer was appointed by you to the house of nobles, i believe.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

Are you still PRETENDING to be a self appointed “Princess” even though it’s a violation of Hawaiian Kingdom law?!?

[@kanakamaoli4108]

The treasurer is aunty Kauʻi Sai, Dr. Keanu Sai’s COUSIN!!!

[@James_Cook_The_9th-p9y]

The case identified the Hawaiian Kingdom because that's just what you called yourself. If you would have named yourself Purple Tiger they would have written that down too. The PCA explicitly said in their award that they make no determination on the current existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom. The PCA does hear cases brought by private parties, that fact is clearly stated on their website.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

_”Is it possible to have an arbitration at the PCA between two private parties?”_ _”The PCA is an intergovernmental organization devoted chiefly to the administration of international dispute resolution proceedings involving at least one state, state-controlled entity, or intergovernmental organization. As such, the PCA does not seek to provide full administrative services in disputes exclusively between private parties.”_

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

As per the Larsen vs Hawaiian Kingdom case, you are being misleading, the tribunal did NOT say it couldn’t make a determination of the existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom, what it said is it couldn’t rule to determine if the Hawaiian Kingdom failed to discharge its obligation to Larsen without first ruling on the legality of the US’s actions. The PCA however DID confirm that the Hawaiian Kingdom continues to exist in continuity, they had to form a tribunal to determine that the Hawaiian Kingdom was in fact a “state, a state controlled entity or a intergovernmental agency”, because as stated in their arbitration rules, one of the parties must be one of those things in order to even go before the PCA. The tribunal confirmed that the Hawaiian Kingdom continues to exist but cannot rule upon the case or the US’s actions because the U.S. refused to be party to arbitrations and therefore there was an indispensable third party clause, as the PCA is a mediator and cannot subpoena a party to arbitration, they must enter arbitration willingly.

[@James_Cook_The_9th-p9y]

@@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom The claim that the PCA confirmed that the Hawaiian Kingdom exists is false. If you don't believe me then read section 12.18. Pages 41-42 of arbitral award yourself in the PCA cases archive. Here is the direct quote: " However, as it has already stated, in the absence of the United States of America, the Tribunal can neither decide that Hawaii is not part of the USA, nor proceed on the assumption that it is not. To take either course would be to disregard a principle which goes to heart of the arbitral function in international law. " So no, it was never confirmed. Respondent named themselves the Hawaiian Kingdom which is why it's mentioned in the award itself.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

@@James_Cook_The_9th-p9y What you’re quoting, is the PCA’s determination of the ability to RULE on the US’s legality of actions, which I have already explained they cannot do due to the US refusing to be party to arbitrations (indispensable third party). A legal ruling on the legality of the US’s actions is a separate case, because in order to hold all party accountable they have to agree to abide by arbitration rulings. However the Hawaiian Kingdoms claims of existence had to be verified in order to arbitrate the Larsen vs Hawaiian Kingdom case, and in order for that ruling to happen the tribunal had to determine if the Hawaiian Kingdom was in fact a state… which they did confirm. You don’t have to believe me, you’re welcome to contact the IADL or the NLG, both international law organizations & both of whom have confirmed all of this already.

[@James_Cook_The_9th-p9y]

@@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom The claim by Dr. Sai has always been that the PCA itself found that the Hawaiian Kingdom exists as a result of the Larsen case. Is this true or not?

[@guslevy3506]

As a 42nd generation Menehune who lives in Poipu Beach now, I laugh at this video. The descendants of the OG colonizers whining about being “colonized” is comedy gold..

[@BarHawa]

Did you get your family history from Narnia? 😂

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

You realize that “menehunes” were just the first wave in multiple waves of Polynesians migrating to Hawai’i… right?! And that the THEORY that Hawai’i was inhabited prior was never proven, there’s no evidence to suggest it’s true and it was started by a white journalist that traveling the world trying to discredit native claims to lands, because he said that ultimately all people descend from Caucasians and therefore all the land on the world rightfully belonged to Caucasians.

[@QuantumOfSolace1]

Glossy lies - don’t fall for this. If it was that serious or impactful you would know - and no one talks about this or is it on the front page as if its reality.

[@kanakamaoli4108]

Cognitive dissonance is a real issue for you, isn’t it?

[@BK-uf6qr]

He went from liking rules to throwing around war crimes allegations. I have a legal theory…laches.

[@manateemilk1]

LMAO

[@damadafknrio]

Keanu werk 4da Feds. Biggest time bullshit guy.

[@kokakolagodcomp-vi2yv]

what in his presentation is "bullshit?"

[@BK-uf6qr]

The problem for the professor is he is not schooled in the arts of real politik. Let’s just say he’s right. Now what? Does he think he will be the new king of Hawaii? That the US will leave? Does he was a reservation for native Hawaiians? $? His ego mania, has led him so close to the pineapples trees that he can’t see the individual pineapples. I enjoy his passion, btw. But still, what is it he wants at the end of this? It seems like a psychological fixation. Tiny organisms every time the phrase war crimes is used.

[@LRTTrucking]

He cannt do anything no more the coco

[@KainoaKealoha-rr6ev]

“The problem for the professor is he is not schooled in the arts of real politik.” The truth of the matter is that he is schooled in the art of real politics and is speaking truth to power about Hawaiʻi political reality “Let’s just say he’s right. Now what?” Well he is right, so now we need to comply with the Law of Occupation “Does he think he will be the new king of Hawaii?” No, and he knows that but I love the straw man argument you posed. Shows me that you have no real argument “That the US will leave?” Yes they will leave just like the US, left Iraq. “Does he was a reservation for native Hawaiians? $?” Hawaiʻi isn’t america. Hawaiʻi is an independent State like that Spain or France but for the last 131 years has been operating has if it was acquired by the US when it never was. “His ego mania, has led him so close to the pineapples trees that he can’t see the individual pineapples.” This comment of yours shows your blatant ignorance. Pineapples have nothing to do with Hawaiʻi and is ONLY associated with Hawaiʻi BECAUSE of the US’ illegal presence here in the islands “I enjoy his passion, btw. But still, what is it he wants at the end of this?” To bring an end to the ongoing belligerent US occupation where Hawaiʻi will be free of america’s tyranny.

[@Alahulapuuloakealahelenokaahu]

Pineapples don’t grow on trees! Your remarks are rooted in ignorance and approaches stupidity. Evidently you don’t think it necessary for you to first observe how pineapples grow before you comment on it, and in such a way as to blow your cover and reveal the depth of your ignorance and lack of rational thinking. As a would-be critic of His Excellency Dr. Sai, you would be a better methamphetamine manufacturer and dealer!

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

Dr Keanu Sai has no ambition to be the King, in fact he CANNOT be the King. By taking this responsibility on he is ensuring he cannot ever be King, because in accordance to international law it would be a conflict of interest for him to deoccupy our Kingdom and then become King, and if he tried he would be committing a violation of international law… unfortunately, because he would be a very good King.

[@MyT-meEnterprise]

First of all if you did your due diligence Dr Sai has KOKO.(this is how you spell it). Secondly At least he’s doing SOMETHING for our people. It’s the furthest ANYONE or ANY BODY OF COUNCIL has gotten in the recognition of the genocide and war crimes along with what has been done to us. If you are not KANAKAMAOLI then like the uninformed (ignorant) you just might have an excuse but if you are KANAKAMAOLI then shame on you! What have you done for our people but stay where you are and joining the rest of those ignorant who are just all WAHA a.k.a. PĀLĀNAIŌ!

[@debraknorenberg1163]

False Narrative: The Hawaiian Government was overthrown. Factual Narrative: Queen Liliuokalani was overthrown. False Narrative: Queen Liliuokalani embodies all aspects of Hawaii Government and Kingdom. Factual Narrative: Queen Liliuokalani may not assume the throne or proceed to act as an executive without the approval/recognition of The House of Nobles, et al. False Narrative: The House of Nobles was overthrown alongside Queen Liliuokalani. Factual Narrative: The House of Nobles declared recess and is in recess currently. False Narrative: The people are divided into four distinct classes: Kauwa, Makaainana, Kahuna, and Alii. Factual Narrative: Kanaka is a person AND a people described in Hawaii as Kauwamakaainanakahunaalii. False Narrative: Only some within the family of the Hawaii people are Alii class. Factual Narrative: All within the family of the Hawaii people are all classes of people united within and may choose and be chosen. False Narrative: International law and U.S. law defines our current state and existence. Factual Narrative: Self-determination, the sovereign individual, in the family of the Hawaii people says otherwise. False Narrative: Solutions to 'regain sovereignty' or 'restoration' or 'recompense', etc. must come from international law, and U.S. law. Factual Narrative: Solutions to 'regain sovereignty' or 'restoration' or 'recompense', etc. must come from Kauwamakaainanakahunaalii, in the family of the Hawaii Kanaka. False Narrative: Only one constitution of the past of the many lawful constitutions of the past throughout sovereign Hawaii history may be chosen to adhere to in current times and in the past. Factual Narrative: ALL or not then, may also be chosen constitutionally ie: Lunalilo, (the only way to be found is to get lost, just no-go deep diving in the shallow). False Narrative: Hawaiian is a Hawaii word. Factual Narrative: Hawaiian is not a Hawaii word. False Narrative: Hawaii had/has worshipped many Gods but, never a single/supreme God during the pre-colonization or post colonization periods. Factual Narrative: We hardly discuss this journey of worship of a single Creator/Supreme God succinctly described in the language of Hawaii as 'I and yet we mention 'I in the language all the time, ie: Ha wai 'I. That last part said, safe travels everyone! Aloha, Deb (Koonohiokala if you're serious or mad at me just know this: I'm just one of many so named, Koonohiokala. hahaha!).

[@kanakamaoli4108]

Your comment is riddled with misinformation. The first constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom was promulgated in 1840 by King Kamehameha III, which was superseded by the 1852 Constitution. Article 25 of the 1852 Constitution provided: “The crown is hereby permanently confirmed to His Majesty Kamehameha III. during his life, and to his successor. The successor shall be the person whom the King and the House of Nobles shall appoint and publicly proclaim as such, during the King’s life; but should there be no such appointment and proclamation, then the successor shall be chosen by the House of Nobles and the House of Representatives in joint ballot.” Kamehameha III proclaimed his adopted son, Alexander Liholiho, to be his heir apparent after receiving confirmation from the Nobles in 1853. Alexander ascended to the Throne upon the death of King Kamehameha III on December 15, 1854. King Kamehameha V ascended to the Throne through the process of appointment by the Premier (Kuhina Nui) Victoria Kamamalu, and confirmation by the Nobles in 1863, because Kamehameha IV had no surviving children. His son and heir, Prince Albert Kamehameha, died at the age of four on August 27, 1862. Since the young Prince’s death, Kamehameha IV did not appoint a successor before he died on November 30, 1863. According to the 1852 Constitution, Article 47 provided, “Whenever the throne shall become vacant by reason of the King’s death…the Kuhina Nui, for the time being, shall…perform all the duties incumbent on the King, and shall have and exercise all the powers, which by this Constitution are vested in the King.” In 1864, a new constitution was promulgated by King Kamehameha V, and Article 22 of the 1864 Constitution provides that, “The Crown is hereby permanently confirmed to His Majesty Kamehameha V. and to the Heirs of His body lawfully begotten, and to their lawful Descendants in a direct line; failing whom, the Crown shall descend to Her Royal Highness the Princess Victoria Kamamalu Kaahumanu, and the heirs of her body, lawfully begotten, and their lawful descendants in a direct line. The Succession shall be to the senior male child, and to the heirs of his body; failing a male child, the succession shall be to the senior female child, and to the heirs of her body.” Princess Kamamalu died on May 29, 1866 without any lineal descendants, leaving the successors to the Throne solely with King Kamehameha V. Since Kamehameha V had no children, Article 22 of the 1864 Constitution provides that a “successor shall be the person whom the Sovereign shall appoint with the consent of the Nobles, and publicly proclaim as such during the King’s life; but should there be no such appointment and proclamation, and the Throne should become vacant, then the Cabinet Council, immediately after the occurring of such vacancy, shall cause a meeting of the Legislative Assembly, who shall elect by ballot some native Ali‘i of the Kingdom as Successor to the Throne.” The Cabinet Council replaced the function of the Premier (Kuhina Nui) under the former constitution, whose office was repealed by the 1864 Constitution, and according to Article 33 would serve as a Council of Regency. On December 11, 1872, Kamehameha V died without children and he did not appoint a successor. Kamehameha V’s Cabinet, as a Council of Regency, convened the Legislative Assembly in special session on January 8, 1873. A regent is a person or persons who serve in the absence of a monarch. In their speech to the Legislature, the Council stated: “His late Majesty did not appoint any successor in the mode set forth in the Constitution, with the consent of the Nobles or make Proclamation thereof during his life. There having been no such appointment or Proclamation, the Throne became vacant, and the Cabinet Council immediately thereupon considered the form of the Constitution in such case made and provided, and Ordered-That a meeting of the Legislative Assembly be caused to be holden at the Court House in Honolulu, on Wednesday which will be the eighth day of January, A.D. 1873, at 12 o’clock noon; and of this order all Members of the Legislative Assembly will take notice and govern themselves accordingly. By virtue of this Order you have been assembled, to elect by ballot, some native Ali‘i of this Kingdom as Successor to the Throne. Your present authority is limited to this duty, but the newly elected Sovereign may require your services after his accession.” On that day the Legislature elected Lunalilo as King. From December 11, 1872 to January 8, 1873, the Kingdom was headed by a Council of Regency. Article 33 of the 1864 Constitution provides that “the Cabinet Council at the time of such decease shall be a Council of Regency…who shall administer the Government in the name of the King, and exercise all the Powers which are Constitutionally vested in the King.” The Legislative Assembly convened again in special session on February 12, 1874 and elected King Kalakaua after Lunalilo, who died without children, failed to appoint a successor. Upon ascension to the Throne, King Kalakaua appointed his brother Prince William Pitt Leleiohoku as his heir apparent and received confirmation from the Nobles. Leleiohoku died April 10, 1877, which prompted Kalakaua to immediately appoint his sister on the same day, Princess Lili‘uokalani, as his heir apparent and he received confirmation from the Nobles. An heir apparentis a person who is first in line of succession to the Throne according to Hawaiian law and cannot be displaced. An heir presumptive, however, is the person, male or female, entitled to succeed to the Throne, but can be replaced by an heir apparent pronounced according to Hawaiian law. When the Legislative Assembly elected King Kalakaua in 1874, a new Stirps had effectively replaced the former Stirps, being the Kamehameha dynasty, with the Keawe-a-Heulu dynasty. Although Lunalilo was an elected King, he was of the Kamehameha dynasty, through Kamehameha’s father, Keoua. Stirps is a direct “line descending from a common ancestor,” and applies to monarchical dynasties. The Stirps for the Kamehameha Dynasty was a direct line from Kamehameha with Keopuolani, being the highest ranking of his wives. Lunalilo was not a direct descendant of Kamehameha, but a direct descendant of Kamehameha’s father, Keoua, whose son, Kalaimamahu, was Kamehameha’s half-brother. Keawe-a-Heulu was one of the four counselor chiefs to Kamehameha I when the islands were consolidated under one kingdom. The other three counselor chiefs were Ke‘eaumoku, Kamanawa and Kame‘eiamoku. Ke‘eaumoku was the father of Ka‘ahumanu, one of Kamehameha’s wives and who later served as Prime Minister after Kamehameha’s death in 1819. Kamanawa and Kame‘eiamoku were brothers and are also represented in the Hawaiian Kingdom’s coat of arms. The Kamehameha dynasty also included the descendants of Kamehameha’s other wives, other than Keopuolani who was the mother of Kamehameha II and III, and the young Princess Nahienaena. These wives and children included: Peleuli who had Maheha Kapulikoliko, Kahoanoku Kina‘u, Kaiko‘olani and Kiliwehi; Kaheiheimalie who had Kamamalu and Kina‘u, who was the mother of Kamehameha IV and V, and Premier Victoria Kamamalu. In 1883, the Keawe-a-Heulu Stirps was formally declared at the Coronation of King Kalakaua and Queen Kapi‘olani. Princess Lili‘uokalani as the heir apparent, and the heirs presumptive, being Princess Virginia Kapo‘oloku Po‘omaikelani, Princess Kinoiki, Princess Victoria Kawekiu Kai‘ulani Lunalilo Kalaninuiahilapalapa, Prince David Kawananakoa, Prince Edward Abnel Keli‘iahonui, and Prince Jonah Kuhio Kalaniana‘ole comprised the new royal lineage. Queen Lili‘uokalani appointed Princess Ka‘iulani as her heir apparent in 1891, but was unable to get confirmation by the Nobles because they were prevented from entering the Legislative Assembly as a result of the so-called 1887 bayonet constitution that began the insurgency. In 1917, Queen Lili‘uokalani died with no such appointment or Proclamation leaving the Throne vacant. After the Queen’s death, only Prince Kuhio was left of the heirs presumptive. All the rest had died. Of the heirs presumptive, only Prince David Kawananakoa died with lineal descendants, but these lineal descendants did not inherit the title of heirs presumptive because they were not proclaimed as such by a reigning Monarch, as King Kalakaua did by proclamation in 1883. While these lineal descendants have no claim to the Throne, they are part of the Estate of the Ali‘i (Chiefs).

[@debraknorenberg1163]

Your reply does not disprove my comment but, it is much appreciated and a well written historical accounting of the haole historical accounting. Much is missed in the translation between our languages when we translate with the English culture this, ethnocentric bias ensues. Ie: translate naupaka

[@debraknorenberg1163]

@@kanakamaoli4108 Sorry for the typos in my previous reply to your comment. That said, I think your well written and thoughtful comment deserves a better reply so, please allow me to attempt that with this one. First: I should make it clear that initially, I've been mistaken in choosing one constitution of the many we have in the past to stand on. Years ago, after having a few revelations via our language and culture, (including religious belief), I now choose all constitutions of the past to stand on thus, increasing my literal and proverbial footing and maneuverability legally and lawfully. I do realize that many have yet to have the revelation of 'all or not then' but, where our kingdom is concerned, all or not then makes a lot of sense considering the legal and lawful precedence of the past. Also, I've come to realize after learning about the methods and impacts of American psychological warfare imposed to disinherit 'Native' people, (including 'Native' Americans), from their property which includes their intellectual property, that power/control and money is at the root of their imposition. The outcome is the loss of understanding of or knowing one's own culture. Thirdly and finally, in our language both partitioned and united is not just definitions of words. In our language is our true history, the names of our stars, navigation, knowledge beyond anything understood today in logic/code/mathematical theory and more for those capable and willing... hidden in plain site. Truly an astounding feat of preservation that makes me proud to be Hawaii, one of many. For example, historically, have you considered that the whole person united within is what Kamehameha the great intended by way of Kauwamakaainanakahunaalii? He Kanaka Oiwi? But, like the humpty dumpty nursery song goes... "Humpty dumpty sat on a wall, humpty dumpty had a great fall and all the king's horses and all the king's men, couldn't put humpty together again." But, I am no loyal king's man. I am a loyal King's woman and I remember what resonates within me and that is a whole person, united within and within the boundaries of our Kingdom. And frankly, I am just one of many. Are you? Kamehameha? Then you'd give me a hug. Have a great day and thank you for caring! Let's empower each other, ea? lift each other up and move forward as just one of many.

[@debraknorenberg1163]

BTW: looking forward to an election... and grateful Kawananakoa chose not to declare an heir prior to her death in recent years... had she not done this, I would not likely be talking about the person united within that is Kauwamakaainanakahunaalii... anyway, one of these days...

[@debraknorenberg1163]

btw: big difference between a kanaka maoli and a kanaka oiwi. o au hoopau kanaka maoli no ka mea ua hai ka'u ma oli keia manawa whether you hear me or not no matter, now it's your turn.

[@Jazzfestn]

MAKE BELIEVE charges. Sounds like a Palestinian.

[@myboynakai]

sounds like Black and White .. MAKE BELIEVE US GOVERNMENT JURISDICTION

[@kokakolagodcomp-vi2yv]

explain

[@maxmillianwiegel1643]

Hawaii is a part of the United States. It’s internationally recognized as such, is governed as such, and the majority of Hawaii’s population today do not wish to be an independent country. Edit: it also appears that Sai is a convicted felon, and fraudster who has affected mostly low-income families.

[@Hittdogg17]

The majority of the population is not Hawaiian or have ancestry that was there before the illegal takeover. You are wrong

[@maxmillianwiegel1643]

@@Hittdogg17 that sounds like the words of an ethnostate wannabe. Denying the citizenship of people living on an island where they were born is exactly like the words of other racist states from the early 20th century used to deny the personhood of groups they disliked. No wonder the Hawaiian independence movement is so small. It’s filled with racists who can’t live with people differ t from them, and refuse to grant anyone bar a minority the title of Hawaiian-even if members of said groups were born on the islands.

[@KainoaKealoha-rr6ev]

If Hawaiʻi is a part of the US, then show me the treaty of cession between the Hawaiian Kingdom and the US

[@maxmillianwiegel1643]

@@KainoaKealoha-rr6evnotice how no one has a addressed the claim that the members of this movement aren’t racist. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Admission_Act Regardless of the character of these individuals there is the vote to join the Union. Broadly speaking today: no foreign country, nor the UN, nor any court in the US has ever sided with these people to suggest that Hawaii isn’t legally a US state. I’ve yet to find a court decision that says Hawaii is an accupied kingdom rather than the reality most islanders subscribe to today. Even more than this, the movement is a minority, as far as I understand it, of both the indigenous Hawaiian population, and the broader state population. Even if a vote were to go up again, every citizen of the islands, regardless of race or gender, has the ability to vote on the status of the island. To deny them thus would break anti-discrimination laws, and US Supreme Court rulings.

[@Alahulapuuloakealahelenokaahu]

Max, you are merely parroting the fictional narrative that has been used in committing the war crimes of Denationilization and Americanization for one hundred eighteen years! You are absolutely not qualified to speak with any degree of credibility, accuracy, authority and certainty. You were not paying attention evidently when Keanu said that the USA has already acknowledged the continuity of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the legitimacy of the Council of Regency of the Acting Hawaiian Kingdom Government by requesting from the Council all of it’s pleadings in the Larsen v Hawaiian Kingdom case. All you have done is to state your unqualified and non authoritative opinion in personem that holds no value and is of no relevance and importance whatsoever. You and your uninformed opinion are hereby disqualified and dismissed with prejudice-meaning it may not be brought up again.

[@OFHArmy]

The Dr. has made some critical errors in his philosophy regarding the Hawaiian Constitution, the Council of Regency, the Permanent Court of Arbitration and war crimes. He also has misinformed the public regarding the duty and obligations of the United States of America and the Adjutant General of the State of Hawaii. The Maui County Council has been mis informed. There will be an immediate response ASAP on Occupied Forces Hawaii Army Channel for clarity on the issue of the U.S. Navy occupation of the realm of Hawaii.

[@myboynakai]

can you please comment on this video the critical errors in detail and who you are and why you claim this? Not being rude or disrespectful but ALL that are reading this probably would like you to elaborate and I am curious as to why your narrative comes off as negative towards his philosophy.. Is there any critical truths besides what you are claiming to be critical errors? Please explain in detail as it is unfair to make such a comment without responding in full , and response should be directly posted on the video because how many do you think will go to your channel fo rthe response? not many based on the empty claim . Most of us are still learning and WE ALL WANT JUSTICE AND WHAT IS RIGHT ! TRANSPARENCY AND TRUTH IS REQUIRED

[@NuEyedeas]

It is not a matter of philosophy but a matter of facts. In a PhD program you don't defend idealistic thinking but theories derived from facts. The facts are there is no treaty, denationalization and repatriation through brainwashing did occur, and resources were pillaged. Anyway, interested in hearing your rebuttal.

[@joyy.706]

Are you discrediting the world court in Switzerland? What’s your agenda?

[@paalani27]

Still waiting for this immediate response.

[@The.Hawaiian.Kingdom]

“Hawai’i” is an island, the big island, and it’s not a “realm”. We are talking about our country, which is *The Hawaiian Kingdom !!*

[@TonyMyerson]

🤙❤️😇😎🌺🤙❤️😇😎🌺 0:21

[@DavidSiliga333]

💯 % ABSOLUTELY FACT!!! ❤😊🎉

[@TonyMyerson]

🤙❤️😇😎🌺🤙❤️😇😎🌺 0:31