" I feel like I'm talking to a politician!" The way she tried to dodge Peter's question, then he called her out immediately! 😅😅😅
@davicool4284 Жыл бұрын
Toukers brand along with H+M and Nike is on the biggest polluter list. Not just in the factory but the rate in which "cheap" clothing is disposed after wear
@susisiebert5942 Жыл бұрын
Hand M and Nike are horrible!!!
@MissSwordfish Жыл бұрын
What’s toukers brand?
@teresawallace1130 Жыл бұрын
No the second hand clothes are cheaper
@Joeyyy28 Жыл бұрын
@@MissSwordfishHawes & Curtis
@kevintwine2315 Жыл бұрын
They don’t call him sweatshop Suleyman for nothing
@IAmTheJayster Жыл бұрын
A niche for an niche with a ridiculous valuation, sounds about right
@FilmMakerJose Жыл бұрын
Plot twist Touker owns all the factories
@kevintwine2315 Жыл бұрын
They don’t call him sweatshop Suleyman for nothing
@scienceevolves4417 Жыл бұрын
And they all have a score minus 1 million coz they're based in chyna....
@GhandiPVR Жыл бұрын
Cant believe they went for this. Theyre trying to become the official ethical brand, would take a lot of capital. Also their “credentials” was just them having decent jobs in the past ahaha
@barnabusdoyle4930 Жыл бұрын
The value of this company wouldn’t come from their ability to verify the info from a brand or company, it’s how much foot traffic their site would get from consumers and how much consumers would be swayed by their recommendations. That’s the value they would bring to their clients and without that their company is pointless
@scienceevolves4417 Жыл бұрын
Indeed, except it's actually pointless irrespective of how many people would fall for it. Profitable maybe, but definitely not useful.
@barnabusdoyle4930 Жыл бұрын
@@scienceevolves4417 It’s marketing. Marketing is effective in some forms and a complete waste of money in other forms. The entire concept of marketing is an illusion.
@Hutchyy Жыл бұрын
Why would big brands pay £100,000 if small brands only pay £1000?
@HistoryonYouTube Жыл бұрын
I can't understand either the beginning valuation, nor the one at the end.
@Erickhetfield Жыл бұрын
A lot of entrepreneurs and companies concerned about "ethics" and the environment, now that it's a highly profitable endeavor.
@barnabusdoyle4930 Жыл бұрын
Is it highly profitable? I feel like a lot of these younger people on Twitter who care about this stuff will still end up going to Walmart to buy the factory tee-shirt made in China because the price is too good. I want to say this is more of a fad then anything else.
@johnchapmonkey8933 Жыл бұрын
@@barnabusdoyle4930yep most of time when it comes down to it people talk a lot about it but in reality don't do it.
@incidentlyaniguana2193 Жыл бұрын
@@barnabusdoyle4930that's the point. It's profitable because you can over price your "ethical" products.
@fearghal107 ай бұрын
Incredible to see Touker openly state that the premise is BS, he knows full well that guys like him have built the supply chain to be impossible to follow - but then bids anyway cause he sers the clout it could buy him if it takes off
@edwoodsnowden Жыл бұрын
Touker could smell the bullshit from miles away! Love the way he destroyed their pitch and crazy claims!
@scienceevolves4417 Жыл бұрын
Probably because this idea if successful would greatly expose and damage his investments😂 so it is by his casual greed and self-interest rather than his ingenuity and any care for humanity.
@demonmech Жыл бұрын
Takes one to know one
@bw7228 Жыл бұрын
That look touker gave to Debra and Peter at the end asif to say , your fked 😂😂
@infjmale91 Жыл бұрын
Touker looks more like Harry Hill's Dad every year.
@randomchannel5686 Жыл бұрын
Touker never ceases to amuse me. The king of hypocrisy
@jamesmurray1138 Жыл бұрын
Touker isn’t getting any of the fashion deals these days because he is always asking for such a high amount of equity
@johnchapmonkey8933 Жыл бұрын
You know dragons won't be happy with validation if they offer 2.4 %
@TheManInBlueFlames Жыл бұрын
ANOTHER eco product...ANOTHER from the app and rating category. I dont really understand how they can claim to be the arbiters of virtue here. Like what enables them to verify the businesses? Their backgrounds even if they line up STILL dont give them that definitive edge.
@scienceevolves4417 Жыл бұрын
From my understanding of it, all value is in that magic formula of the internet of things big data computer modelling a i generated algorithm😅😅😅
@ChintanCG Жыл бұрын
Wow I didn't think they would get a single offer
@jasonm4332 Жыл бұрын
she worked at developing sustainability policy at the WEF...................
@louisescaife8304 Жыл бұрын
I must be thick. I don't understand any of it
@00Kuja00 Жыл бұрын
In short: they think they have the moral high ground to judge what others should buy, so (1) they can make money and (2) impose their set of values on a global scale.
@greatsoldierАй бұрын
same
@hamza361 Жыл бұрын
Touker always acts so arrogant and rude when anything clothing related comes to the den.
@BenjaminGoose Жыл бұрын
His companies score very low on sustainability, that's why he's so aggressive here.
@RealRushinRussian Жыл бұрын
tbh so does Peter when it's anything tech related. I also think in both cases it's more about strategy and less about their actual personality.
@bw7228 Жыл бұрын
Anything with drones it’s peters baby 😂
@1jackal17 ай бұрын
Ex World economic forum employee social credit ranking system. No thanks. I won't eat ze bugs.
@techdesigner9741 Жыл бұрын
She worked at the World economicforum ? 😱☠🤢
@scienceevolves4417 Жыл бұрын
And apparently oh do proud of it 😅😅😅 Instant red flag innit!!
@RougeOX49Unknown Жыл бұрын
What’s bad about the world economic forum? I’m confused
@scienceevolves4417 Жыл бұрын
@@RougeOX49Unknown Let's start counterarguments shall we. What's good about it in your opinion?
@geofreyr Жыл бұрын
"this is a global opportunity", "we are the platform to get this right", blah, blah, blah. Everyone says the same old crap.
@00Kuja00 Жыл бұрын
Don't forget the "revolution". But yes I agree, just a bunch of smelly old hot air.
@ellenkarlsson9490 Жыл бұрын
Aren't there free, non-profit websites that do the same thing?
@kaliou6645 Жыл бұрын
Brands? Ec🌍 Friendly?🌸 and Tech 🖥️ Must be a well suited pitch for Brand Lalvani, Deborah and Peter 🍕
@TwiceBorn369 Жыл бұрын
Good business if they become the trusted brand verification platform. Other brands will worry about their eco-friendly rep.
@davesmith3075 Жыл бұрын
This is the sort of technology that’s going to digitally imprison us in the future 😢
@rossgoodchild1852 Жыл бұрын
Don't let it then don't use apps or bank online only deal in cash and you will be fine
@edward9643 Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately nz now receives these clips within hours of going to air so I'll have to wait about a year to see if the deal actually went through
@originalunoriginal4055 Жыл бұрын
Who is nz ?
@debyaka Жыл бұрын
Dont let them hug or shake hands!!!! Its too dangerous!!!!
@Krakanakis Жыл бұрын
Of course that this was WEF related
@salemkid1979 Жыл бұрын
yup, IM OUT!!!!!!!!!!!
@BenjaminGoose Жыл бұрын
*insert WEF conspiracy nonsense here*
@Krakanakis Жыл бұрын
@@BenjaminGoose cool and edgy reply dude
@BenjaminGoose Жыл бұрын
Lemme guess, you're gullible and think the WEF wants to force us to eat bugs? 🤣🤣🤣@@Krakanakis
@theofficialstig Жыл бұрын
scam
@willowwren7752 Жыл бұрын
So tired of Peter and Debra getting the deals 🤢
@RB-qh7ix9 ай бұрын
Absolute garbage "company". This must be the worst investment ever on DD.
@bvds2007 Жыл бұрын
Sorry, those are not credentials. Yet another pseudo sustainability scheme. The very fact they are being paid by brands makes it not credible. A consumer subscription model, would be more credible and potentially more scalable if done right.
@shadaba.qureshi4367 Жыл бұрын
bottom line, cheaper you are the more polluter you are....
@dodihoza7859 Жыл бұрын
Touker 😂😂😂
@will-i-am-not2 ай бұрын
Touker is a massive hypocrite
@originalrenigade Жыл бұрын
Worked for the WHO? Yeah those guys are legit 😅
@theofficialstig Жыл бұрын
african presidential campaigner = aka corruption
@scienceevolves4417 Жыл бұрын
Yeahhhh because they "care" oh so much about humanity!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@sadikmeah4057 Жыл бұрын
Another reggae reggae sauce
@theofficialstig Жыл бұрын
so true, except that one actually made millions and this one went bankrupt
@AnnAnn-xx4uf9 ай бұрын
Why because the guys black?
@sadikmeah40579 ай бұрын
@@AnnAnn-xx4uf Yes
@jaysing9766 Жыл бұрын
U really think these big brands give a toss to ethics
@2dradon2 Жыл бұрын
Customers do, and thats the point
@itszenbaby Жыл бұрын
But its the brands paying them, not the customers if I understood correctly
@ryankeane8656 Жыл бұрын
They like to appear that they do
@00Kuja00 Жыл бұрын
And one must ask to themselves "whos ethics?".
@ryankeane8656 Жыл бұрын
@@00Kuja00 very complicated I suppose. A set of rules imposed by "someone"
@salemkid1979 Жыл бұрын
wait, is he snaking her?
@salemkid1979 Жыл бұрын
btw, i had steak and potatoes for lunch!
@soundproductionandadvice Жыл бұрын
WEF... Sigh.
@salemkid1979 Жыл бұрын
eat ze bugs!? IM OUT!!!!
@ryankeane8656 Жыл бұрын
I'll own nothing and be happy and for that reason I'm out
@mohammednaser-q3e5 ай бұрын
BIg mistake
@SpencerLeCroix-qi6lz Жыл бұрын
I rather listen to my grandad eating a peach for 30 min, keep in mind my grandad have no teeth, rather than listen to these fake people specially the girl for like 30 seconds
@techtitanuk560911 ай бұрын
Hate all this eco ethical videos argh
@ianoliver7271 Жыл бұрын
Well, the company is still going strong!
@mauharley Жыл бұрын
Based on what? Their last set of accounts state that they're 145k in the red.
@billyjesus5442 Жыл бұрын
another great investment. @@mauharley
@JonasHamill Жыл бұрын
@@mauharley That is in line with their numbers though. This is a pretty recent episode so it's possible they're still forecasting greater profits this year
@SpencerLeCroix-qi6lz Жыл бұрын
Mate they are not strong at all, I have no idea where your Indy come from, however based on last year financial index they are in debt