DREDD Clip - Last Stand (2012) Karl Urban

Рет қаралды 140,426

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 84

@chrisdooley6468 3 жыл бұрын

Such a fantastic movie. Karl Urban really killed it playing Dredd and his ‘chin acting’ helped improve the roll leaps and bounds imo.

@controlledburst 3 жыл бұрын

NOT remove that helmet is the smartest move in the making of Dredd. Nor caving to the 'emotions make us human' tripe. Urban really owned that part

@1532JJ 3 жыл бұрын

The thing is, he was emotional. He was just 100% professional about his job. You could see him give the vagrancy guy at the start of the movie a chance to move, he called an ambulance for the guy the first criminals took out. I'm sure in his day to day life, he's actually a reasonable and normal judge. But once him and Andersen got locked into Peach Trees, he removed all the un-neccesary emotions and focused on the useful ones. He showed genuine anger on several occasions, towards Ma-Ma, towards the corrupt judges. He just didn't take it to comic book levels like Stallone did.

@clxwncrxwn 3 жыл бұрын

@@1532JJ and the greatest thing about karl urban’s role is never breaks character, he is dredd, and he never takes off his helmet to show his face for 5 minutes, we get what we need,

@rikk319 3 жыл бұрын

Wow, movies like this really get the sociopaths out and commenting. Logic and emotions are both part of a normal human psyche. Sorry you don't have a decent helping of both, but, you know...genetics are a crapshoot.

@u.s.1974 3 жыл бұрын

@@rikk319 Read the comics, THEN dare to repeat your unqualified attempt of psychological evaluation in a youtube comment section.

@LordTyph 3 жыл бұрын

Being fair, Dredd clearly does have emotions, he just doesn't let them get in the way. He's ruthless because that's what the job demands. What the law demands. He can't let emotions bias his judgement. He can let things like rage and disgust help fuel his pursuit of justice, yes, and he is willing to show mercy to a limited extent, but the law is ironclad. It cannot and should not be swayed by emotions. It only bows before truth. He gives one of the perps at the start of the movie a chance at a lesser sentence (life imprisonment, yes, but it's better than death). He gives the vagrant a chance to leave. There's that slight bit of mercy. Of compassion. But it never once overtakes his duty.

@crazyrabbits 2 жыл бұрын

1:42 - the slightest nod of acknowledgement when he realizes Ma-Ma's got one up on him (albeit briefly) is perfection.

@Theemilioyap 3 жыл бұрын

Been almost a decade since this awesome movie came out.

@Justdizzy 3 жыл бұрын

I only heard about this movie in 2015... what kind of marketing did they do? Great movie I loved every second of it and would have loved to see it in the theaters.

@nerofl89 3 жыл бұрын

That was the reason it failed. They did little to no marketing, and what little they did was for the 3d craze going on at the time. I barely caught it in the theaters only because I happened to see it was playing there when I went the week before.

@iljavija 3 жыл бұрын

@@nerofl89 Nah, Dredd took much flak for being a copy of Raid (Iko Uwais stars). Fans were not happy with the fact that a beloved comic book legend is being thrown into a copy movie. I saw both, yes the premise is similar but both movies work great and I re watch both once per year (Raid 2 also).

@nerofl89 3 жыл бұрын

@@iljavija It took unfair flak for that as if you look at script writing and production time at the most charitable it would be simultaneous invention, however, if taken timing into account it was The Raid that was copying Dredd. Dredd had a horrible production time and was in limbo for a quite a while. The script writing for Dredd began in 2006, 5 years before The Raid came out (most movies have a 3-4 year turn around), and Dredd was announced in 2008, after some limbo time it was finally in production in 2010. Also those comparisons didn't come out until after the movie released. It was the lack of marketing that really hurt Dredd, and the other thing that really hurt the financial outcome was that it received a limited release (in other words, most theaters across the US did not even have it).

@psarc9451 3 жыл бұрын

The movie was ready, but it was stuck in release limbo for so long that the script was leaked. The raid was filmed and released before Dredd appeared in theaters, even though it is the original.

@chrisdooley6468 3 жыл бұрын

@@psarc9451 yes exactly what I read. Cecil at GoodBadFlicks does a great video on the movie and it’s production hell it lived through. The production studio dropped the ball on several fronts unfortunately

@kennethconnors5316 3 жыл бұрын

Carl Urban is one of my fav actors up there with Cruz and Eastwood ,,makes his point!

@nicedudeb12 3 жыл бұрын

This movie was the great i hope that there would be a sequel

@MikeTheGamer77 3 жыл бұрын

Poor box office sales.

@robertlindop9365 3 жыл бұрын

@@MikeTheGamer77 I know a total tragedy it is an awesome film

@wildudyr 3 жыл бұрын

Karl Urban as Judge Dredd has the perfect face for the role. Just try and show me another 3 o' clock beared mug that screams grimey, corrupt justice more than his

@DissertatingMedieval 3 жыл бұрын

That's the thing. Dredd isn't corrupt. He just isn't "good." The law is the law is the law. That's the lodestar.

@eddiewinehosen6665 3 жыл бұрын

@@DissertatingMedieval Spot on! He's as far away from corrupt as they come. He however follows the letter of the law without any exception. I remember one episode from the comics when there's a massive shootout and some civilians flee from the gunfire by running on a rolling sidewalk where only walking is allowed and he sentences them to 6 months for running. Hence not caring that they're fleeing from gunfire, they broke the law.

@timothyhouse1622 3 жыл бұрын

@@DissertatingMedieval reading comprehension is hard, bruh. He didn't say Dredd was corrupt. He said the system was corrupt. Dredd was a good lap dog for the system but the system itself was rotten to the core.

@DissertatingMedieval 3 жыл бұрын

@@timothyhouse1622 No. Let's parse the germane part of the sentence, which is everything after "just try and show me": "3 o'clock beared [sic] mug" is the subject of the independent clause (the actual subject of the sentence is "you") . So the clause is about that face. "That screams grimey [again sic], corrupt justice more than his" is the object of the clause. That is clear by the "his" there even if the fact it's an adjective clause didn't. So by taking the clause at face value we can determine that what we're talking about is a face that is "grimy" and "corrupt." There's no indication that the face is intended to be a metaphor for systemic corruption, but instead that it's intended to be descriptor of the actual face itself. Because of that, we have to assume that any corruption adheres to the owner of that face, which is Dredd. You make the assumption that's not the case because you have additional context clues about the nature of the Justice System in Mega-City One from your knowledge of 2000AD or the movie. But that's not inherent in the clause as constructed. For the original post to do that work it would need a subordinate clause or additional sentence making that metaphorical connection apparent to the reader. I should also note I don't disagree with your assessment of the system, there. But Dredd himself is not corrupt, which the clause in question suggests with its construction.

@ATEC101 3 жыл бұрын

Every Clint Eastwood from 'spaghetti' to Unforgiven. Where do you fetuses think this came from?

@NoJusticeNoPeace 3 жыл бұрын

Dredd was created originally as a satire of Thatcher's law-and-order fascism. He was the symbol of thuggish, brutal police oppression personified: unbending, unthinking, violent, aggressive, homicidal, and pitiless. The fact that he became regarded as a hero is a sad testament to where our culture has gone. This movie actually does a pretty good job of portraying Dredd the way he's intended, as utterly without mercy or compassion, and coldly able to mete out death without pause or regret. The ending here was perfect. Mama miscalculates that Dredd actually cares about innocents. He doesn't. Ultimately he doesn't even value his own life above duty to rigid order. He executes Mama and gambles that her transmitter has a range, but he has no way of knowing for sure; he regards passing her sentence as more important than his life, Anderson's life, and the lives of everyone in that building.

@mauz791 3 жыл бұрын

Holt shit you're right, with the way he spoke I thought he knew for sure

@eddiewinehosen6665 3 жыл бұрын

How could it be created in 1977 as a satire of Thatcher's law-and-order fascism when she didn't get into power until 1979? It's a satire alright but the Thatcher connection is either a figment of your imagination or someone has fed you a BS story.

@NoJusticeNoPeace 3 жыл бұрын

@@eddiewinehosen6665 Thatcher had been leader of the party since 1975, and her attitudes were well known. It's not like charging poor people money to vote and using the army to crush striking workers was a big surprise. And I don't need anyone to tell me, I read 2000 AD for decades, mostly for Strontium Dog. But if you don't want to take my word for it, Alan Moore has talked about the Thatcher connection.

@KingDusk278 3 жыл бұрын

It was a lose-lose scenario for Dredd. If he gives up then she wins and continues to rule over the criminal underworld while still distributing drugs. If he kills her then everyone loses regardless. He had no choice to take a gamble of throwing her off the room and hoping that the signal isn’t strong enough reach that far. Being able to never compromise your duty is truly commendable on his part. You can’t win a war without casualties.

@dustinlindsey4452 3 жыл бұрын

I disagree. If he truly only valued duty, law, and rigid order, he would have failed Anderson at the end of the movie--but he didn't.

@Hugging_Cactus 3 жыл бұрын

why isn’t karl urban ... Batman?

@landoonline6393 3 жыл бұрын

good fucking question

@darksidebeauty9907 2 жыл бұрын

No he was not

@Chom20 3 жыл бұрын

The video made me realise theres a continuity error, at 0:01 Anderson runs past Dredd and then at 0:03 she runs past him again.

@MikeTheGamer77 3 жыл бұрын

Its the same scene just from a different position. Had to use the footage I guess.

@tite93 3 жыл бұрын

Mixed up editing, should've switched those shots and cut the second one into the first

@myoman1977 Жыл бұрын

nooo stop finding flaws in perfection

@georgedavidson957 Жыл бұрын

Lena Headey played this so well. she oozed menace. all time second fav villainesse after hela (cate blanchette)

@lipranditoys 2 жыл бұрын

Come on, cutting off the second part of the scene takes all meaning off of it

@rogerwennstrom6677 3 жыл бұрын

This scene is pretty meaningless when the second cool (but kinda stupid/dangerous if you think about it) part is omitted.

@aluisious 3 жыл бұрын

Yeah I don't understand what happened.

@MarkSmith-ud4sd 3 жыл бұрын

@@aluisious Dredd pumped her full of slow mo to slow her heart rate right down, as she fell. Dredd gambled on Ma Ma's pulmonary transmitter frequency set to the detonator, losing its signal after a certain distance.

@thehulk86 3 жыл бұрын

anderson ran across the hallway twice right at the beginning

@darksidebeauty9907 2 жыл бұрын

Give me urban any day and one of the best male actors his character billy butcher on the boys is top shit all the way

@reecehittinthepiece1 2 жыл бұрын

2022 love you

@mistercohaagen 3 жыл бұрын

And then in prison she learned about whitening toothpaste, and eventually wound up on work release selling missiles to OPEC, leveraging her facial scars as badassery for Raytheon.

@OneBiasedOpinion 3 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure she ended up splattered on the ground floor of Peach Trees...

@jamesgriffey7982 3 жыл бұрын

If you haven't seen the whole movie, boy do I have a surprise for you about what happens next