We loved celebrating the style in The Great Gatsby.
@bleubird766 жыл бұрын
When you have all the money you could need then you can dress in a way that you present yourself to the world the way that you want to be seen. When you live in poverty you wear whatever it is you can afford even if what you are wearing is simply saying you are poor and can't afford to buy better clothes.
@sampuatisamuel97853 жыл бұрын
Even those on a tight budget can look smart if coordinate your colours and good grooming (leave track pants for home wear)
@bleubird763 жыл бұрын
@@sampuatisamuel9785 You can't buy what you can't afford. Pretending that it's the fault of people "on a tight budget" is ignoring the actual reality of poverty and blaming the poor.
@marioandmichellesantiago25093 жыл бұрын
You'd be surprised how affordable some casual nice clothing is. I can get a nice and well fitted V neck shirt for $6
@oooh19 Жыл бұрын
Well there are thrift stores and sales etc so it makes clothing and accessories more affordable
@kdum88 ай бұрын
That certainly used to be true. However with Uniqlo these days making classics for next to nothing, being a well dress manned is just a matter of knowledge and style.
@davidsghost499310 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't it be nice if people went around dressed like that again? Much better that seeing people in sweat pants.
@BeautyLilya5 жыл бұрын
Davids Ghost no...I like wear casual..... I’m not rich, wealthy... or white...
@user-hf4qy3mt6z5 жыл бұрын
@@BeautyLilya rich and wealthy are synonyms and you don't have to be white to dress this fabulously.
@dog_lover9975 жыл бұрын
raebele getting money was harder for minority’s.
@GREVIEWS025 жыл бұрын
@@BeautyLilya in the movie they had the black people in the background
@weirdguy49483 жыл бұрын
Too pretentious
@andreatrv10 жыл бұрын
Anyone else catch the gemma ward cameo?
@dararohan12093 жыл бұрын
They definitely had classier standards back then.
@greatmomentsofopera71704 жыл бұрын
The costume design is so unhistorical. Complete mix from all over the 1920s, and huge modern influence. Figure hugging? Cleavage? Bizarre.
@lunariaviggot64324 жыл бұрын
Yes true no cleavage and definitely not figure hugging. .. also the shoes are kid of messy . And the lower class didn't dress like that
@nichtswieeswar3 жыл бұрын
the 30s were definitely a much bigger inspiration
@weirdguy49483 жыл бұрын
That’s the point. It’s meant to be more modern
@sampuatisamuel97853 жыл бұрын
I thought that the costumes were right bon point
@lululululululu9144 Жыл бұрын
@Sanctus Paulus 1962 no, it’s meant to be more modern, which is why the music is also more modern and the structure takes on a more modern narrative. take marie antoinette from 2006 for example: a pair of chuck taylors shows up during the “i want candy” montage. not a mistake; it was done on purpose. don’t be so dense.
@94nomusicnolife10 жыл бұрын
I loved the movie, but the music was just not right
@ckg33627 жыл бұрын
94nomusicnolife some of it was, I mean "Love is Blindness", was perfect, and the Sonata with "Young and Beatiful" was absolutely gorgeous