Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392 JL on 38’s with 2.5 Inches of Lift | Inside Line

  Рет қаралды 18,266

Driving Line

Driving Line

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 47
@jlr_adventurer
@jlr_adventurer 2 ай бұрын
Love your channel and all the information you have for us !! 👍🏻 I would love this tire in 38x12.5
@ghernandez6457
@ghernandez6457 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for talking about the spare tire. I ordered some Patagonia 38s which will probably measure around 37 - 37.5 mounted and I have an MP concepts tire relocation and support bracket that raises the mounting bracket about an inch like yours. Hopefully that's enough for it to clear.
@DayVMusic_
@DayVMusic_ Ай бұрын
Do you think a 3.5 lift would clear 39s?
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine Ай бұрын
Lots of variables (tire brand, wheel specs, lift type) Part of it depends how much bump stop spacing you are willing to add. You can probably make it work, but you’ll need to limit the up travel if you are going to take it off road. Even then, you may need to split the flares.
@Alwaysgotafighterschance
@Alwaysgotafighterschance Жыл бұрын
Love your channel all the way here from Australia. Question in general across the rubicon spec factory Dana 44 axles on the JL's what is the biggest tire you recommend going before having to go to 1 ton axles or upgrading cvs and axles shafts to chromeolys?
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine Жыл бұрын
In my experience, they seem to handle 37s in stock form without issue. I think 38’s can work, but I would plan on upgrading the ball joints and swapping out the axleshafts.
@jeeperp3926
@jeeperp3926 Жыл бұрын
Tires that size and larger really should have PSC hydro assist.
@RockLander818
@RockLander818 8 ай бұрын
I'm trying to decide between this tire and size vs the Mickey Thompson Baja Boss M/T in the 40. Just got off of IG and I guess I was on your page.. LOL!!!! Tacoma can't really handle 40s but was a monster on 37s... I know these are the right choice but I just not ready yet to settle for 38s. Almost rather just find the next weak link. bahaha. Great video and thank you!
@aristotlefullthrottle9567
@aristotlefullthrottle9567 4 ай бұрын
Is the stress on the axles and popping bc of the weight of the 38 you had on or the larger rotating mass? Trying to think if the new BFG 39x13.5t17 which is measured at 38.5 and only weights 70 lbs would be better?
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine 4 ай бұрын
The 38 is only 3 pounds heavier than the 37. I think it’s just that massive footprint.
@aristotlefullthrottle9567
@aristotlefullthrottle9567 3 ай бұрын
Yes the Nitto 37s are 87 lbs and 38’s are 90 lbs. Was thinking if the BFG 39’s which are 70 would be stressful to the axles and the popping would be there or not. That’s 17 lbs lighter at each corner
@user-nk8tw4jl4c
@user-nk8tw4jl4c 5 күн бұрын
Can you run 13.5 wide on 8.5 inch wheel?
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine 5 күн бұрын
Yes.
@rubicon4wheeler
@rubicon4wheeler Жыл бұрын
I'd love to see more tires in a narrower 38x12.5R17 or 38x11.5R17 size.
@rsanoian
@rsanoian 8 ай бұрын
Nitto Recon Grapplers have a 38x12.5x17 that weights 80lb per tire, about 10 pounds less than a lot of 37's. I am going with those or the 37" on my 392.
@Daywalker78
@Daywalker78 Жыл бұрын
You said 38s are pushing the limits? Could it be more that 38" Trail Grapplers are pushing the limits? 37" TGs weigh 87lbs, 38"TGs weigh 91lbs, but 38" Ridge Grapplers only weigh 81lbs. 🤷🏿‍♂️
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine Жыл бұрын
It’s less about the weight (as you see little difference between the 37 and 38 Trail). It’s more about the footprint and grip of the 38x13.50. I’ve had 37 Trails on for a long time and could immediately tell the difference with the 38. Part of it is also the 392 weights a lot, which makes the steering feel very heavy off-road.
@justinthomas1905
@justinthomas1905 8 ай бұрын
How much spacing you recommend on 37s on a 3.5”? It barely touches at full lock …. 1.5” enough? Stock Freedom wheels
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine 8 ай бұрын
I believe that wheel has 6 inches of backspacing. So, a 1.5 spacer will put it at 4.5, which is fine for suspension clearance.
@Blue-P51
@Blue-P51 9 ай бұрын
What do you think was the popping sounds were you were hearing? CV’s? Axle shaft? Does the 392 have better ball joints than the non 392’s?
@Ali_Mansour_Editor
@Ali_Mansour_Editor 9 ай бұрын
I believe it was the CV’s making the noise. I have since upgraded to RCV Performance axleshafts and haven’t heard it again. The 392 gets the same ball joints as all of the other Wranglers unfortunately. The only steering upgrades it has from the factory are the iron knuckles and iron steering gear box.
@anthonycannone1573
@anthonycannone1573 Жыл бұрын
New to the Jeep game, so no judgement ! do you feel that upgraded axle shafts in a stock axle on a 2022 JLUR 392 would handle 40’s ?
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine Жыл бұрын
I wouldn’t be comfortable going off-road like that.
@KuyaJones
@KuyaJones Жыл бұрын
thoughts on 37x13.5x17?
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine Жыл бұрын
Would fit fine, but I would just make sure to stay with 4.75 inches of backspacing. The steering is probably going to feel a little heavier off-road compared to a 12.50 though.
@richardchocha1513
@richardchocha1513 Жыл бұрын
Excellent review 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@jason8795
@jason8795 8 ай бұрын
Even those 38"s were tucked under the flares nicely. Are the method wheels 0 offset?
@Ali_Mansour_Editor
@Ali_Mansour_Editor 8 ай бұрын
Yes. Zero offset and 4.75 inches of backspacing.
@rubentherubicon
@rubentherubicon Жыл бұрын
Have you tested this 392 jeep wrangler rubicon with a 2 1/2 lift, equipped with 38" tires accompanied by non beadlock method wheels...with a manual transmission/stick shift? Or does it have an automatic transmission? VS a 3.6 stock suspension jeep wrangler rubicon equipped with a standard transmission/ stick shift? I would love to see that video!!!
@qosmio2140
@qosmio2140 Жыл бұрын
All 392 are automatic
@rubentherubicon
@rubentherubicon Жыл бұрын
@@qosmio2140 unless special order, which takes about 6 months
@johnomahony7364
@johnomahony7364 8 ай бұрын
Very informative as usual. You always seem to know the questions i have lol. The 392 looks awesome
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine 8 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@larshamilton40
@larshamilton40 Жыл бұрын
at what point do the brakes need to be upgraded? would 37's, 38's+, mandate and 'big brake' upgrade, or can the stock brakes handle the weight? i have a 21 glad rubi.. thx Ali
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine Жыл бұрын
The brakes feel fine on my Gladiator with 38s. A big brake kit wouldn’t hurt, but I don’t think it’s absolutely necessary. I suppose a lot of it will depend on how heavy the Gladiator is. For 37s and 38s, I just don’t think it’s necessary.
@JEEP-N-DIRT
@JEEP-N-DIRT Жыл бұрын
Rubi axles on JL's and JT's already have big brakes. FYI
@GoneAgain-Outdoors
@GoneAgain-Outdoors 10 ай бұрын
Ok I asked about the wheel size on the other video but I see you covered it here. I’m a little worried about 17x9’s right now. I have 5 inches of backspacing so I’m going to get into the control arms I believe. Man, it never ends with this stuff. 😂
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine 10 ай бұрын
Are you on 37s or 38s? A 37 on 5 inches will be fine unless you have a fluid resi setup like I have.
@GoneAgain-Outdoors
@GoneAgain-Outdoors 10 ай бұрын
@@DrivingLine same tire. Nitto 38 13.50 trail grapplers.
@GoneAgain-Outdoors
@GoneAgain-Outdoors 10 ай бұрын
Tires are going on this morning. I guess I’ll play around with it and see what it does. I’m trying to keep them tucked under the fender as much as I can but it looks like I may have to go to -12.
@mblake0420
@mblake0420 Жыл бұрын
Why does 392 use cv joints?
@GevoA1
@GevoA1 Жыл бұрын
All models, including the 392 (no other option) come equipped with the clutch type transfer case come with CV front axle shafts. This type of transfer case offers the ability of full type 4 wheel drive (or all wheel drive AWD) which allows for use on the streets (unlike the standard model). In the case of the 392, you ONLY have the option of AWD (no rear wheel drive). The CV shafts offer improved balance for reduced vibration, improved steering as a result and increased strength at angles. The downside of this type of transfer case is the strength. Hope this helps.
@LOVE-62
@LOVE-62 Жыл бұрын
Leaving it in the 2wd? Any side effect from doing that ? I have a Tazer on my 392, but I have never left it in 2wd other than for a quick “show off” burn out. Great video
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine Жыл бұрын
Putting it in 2WD will preserve the life of the clutch pack inside of the transfer case. It might be a little more pressure on the rear axle since you’re not splitting the load. But, the rear axle isn’t as much of a known failure point as the clutch pack inside of the transfer case.
@WoolyNips
@WoolyNips Жыл бұрын
Did the Daniel on my stock 22 3.6 XR. Handled it with little to no problem. I am happy with my stock 35s honestly. I think the 38s are just too big, which it seems you came to the same conclusion. I would like to upgrade to the 37s, but I do not want to struggle with power and the loss in MPGs…
@DrivingLine
@DrivingLine Жыл бұрын
I think 37s are the perfect balance. With the 4.56 gears, I felt the RPMs were too high on the highway with 35s. The 37‘s just seem to be the sweet spot. Especially when driving the Jeep in 2WD.
А ВЫ ЛЮБИТЕ ШКОЛУ?? #shorts
00:20
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
My Daughter's Dumplings Are Filled With Coins #funny #cute #comedy
00:18
Funny daughter's daily life
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Man Mocks Wife's Exercise Routine, Faces Embarrassment at Work #shorts
00:32
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Ozoda - Lada ( Official Music Video 2024 )
06:07
Ozoda
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Dave's 35 Year Journey from a 1 Bay Storage Unit!
16:41
Dave's Auto Center
Рет қаралды 102 М.
Is The LJ The Best Jeep Ever Built?
18:11
Harry Situations (Harry Situations)
Рет қаралды 51 М.
Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392 Essential Mods & Upgrades | Inside Line
13:20
NEW Spare Tire Carrier for our 2024 Jeep Wrangler 392
15:29
DIRT ROAD CRED
Рет қаралды 24 М.
А ВЫ ЛЮБИТЕ ШКОЛУ?? #shorts
00:20
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН