Dyno Test - Mitsubishi Pajero 2013 Ecu Remap

+26Hp +126Nm - Strong ECU Remap for this Mitsubishi Pajero 2013.
67k km for this powerful 2.5 Turbo Diesel Engine.
Definitely a much more responsive car, less fuel burnt and a strong pull.
One more happy customer here at Diesel Tuning Australia.
Ask for a quote here: goo.gl/s1kvPp or visit www.dieseltuni...

[@stephenmills319]

Try 3.2 litre engine.

[@yutuniopati]

Or the 3.8L 😂

[@markshearing5366]

Firstly These engines are 3.2 Litre Turbo diesel Not 2.5... Second... Your Ratings are in HP Not KW as they are meant to be . 166 HP converted to KW is even less power than standard engine output of 147KW But great video :)

[@simon8089]

Hates Spam it’s just a pity they claimed 83hp at the wheels before the tune😖 check out the previous video

[@darrenbedell6842]

Holy shit that was like watching a marshmallow melt in a fire.......!!!

[@58markts]

Yes correct.. Hp is favoured over kW but manufactures of vehicles give us KW ratings not hp ratings, so to the average Joe blow its engine power stated as KW not HP. Go into any showroom or look at any engine output details from manufacturer and its KW. There are plenty of reports where kW is stated because its the new norm. Get a grip and move with the times. Yes your results are from the wheel output on a dyno understandable but the fact remains that this is in standard form a 147kw diesel engine. Of course its going to be a lot lower output at the rear wheel. Just because I state facts no need to get your nickers in a twist.

[@mirage8753]

oh, its 2.5td 4d56/ there is always question if its worth reliability wise

[@ianlara9290]

I have. A 2013 pajero LWB exceed. Done 200,000k I wanted to explore doing ECU mapping. Can it be done with those k’s

[@ianlara9290]

Is the 3.2 diesel.

[@dannycalderon8516]

Have you ever tuned a 2.5l turbo diesel? Is it even possible

[@malikabey]

140 KW not 140 HP

[@graemestephens1894]

Flywheel hp and torque

[@alanhuntley]

You never reply when calling so have given up trying.