I'm such a big fan of women like you coming up with practical, mathematical systems that we can use when we get sick of the illusive, breaks-his-own-rues, avoids-fat-women, male-gaze one.
@itsmebecky24Ай бұрын
Oooh the shade
@ElliiiBlabla6 ай бұрын
I like that you included that the shape CAN change when one looses or gains weight! I think it's very true and in the kibbe system it causes confusion.
@evam41826 ай бұрын
So true man. I’m a SG but since having two kids in the last two years I’ve changed SO much and looking at pictures of myself when I was a teen I feel like I was a flamboyant gamine and now I genuinely feel like I’m the “not real” true gamine 😂 I’ve done the quiz so many times and there’s just some things that are not accounted for in his system and that’s my only conclusion. I often wonder if he ever considered how women’s bodies change after childbirth. Cause, wow do they ever 😂
@dahliaherrod43012 ай бұрын
That's kinda true but not really. I've gained and lost up to a 100 lbs in my life and find that I remain a Kibbe natural and apple shape throughout the losses and gains. I don't stop having a broad back, big hands and feet and long limbs just because I gain weight. I tend to gain weight in my belly, back and upper thighs. I notice that pear shapes like my mom gain it primarily in their lower body. Of course, once you gain over 100 lbs the fat has nowhere to go but everywhere, so people's shapes start to look alike, but it takes time for that to develop.
@hannahmaybury71176 ай бұрын
Wow Ellie, this is genuinely so helpful! I am that 5"8, curvy girl who has spent more time than I would like to admit agonising about whether I am Soft Dramatic or Flamboyant Natural. I feel so seen! Reframing my body type as Wide, Long and Curvy takes away all of the confusion - straightforward, simple and easy to implement. Thank you!
@elliejeanroyden6 ай бұрын
I am so so pleased to read this comment! I am so excited that you have found your place in this framework
@selinaaylin72246 ай бұрын
Just started the video, but I literally have those exact proportions and can’t wait to hear the explanation on types like us ❤😊
@nevehughes61116 ай бұрын
I am exactly the same and it's so frustrating because I just cannot figure out which one I am - 5'8 with wide shoulders, long, and very curvy and hourglass shape (though personally I prefer the SD styles (I have a big fire style root)) so idk at this point haha
@Phthalocyanine.Stardust6 ай бұрын
Same for me, too! Wide/long/round describes my 5'10" curvy body so much better than any other system ever has.
@liiteratii6 ай бұрын
This is a great framework, Ellie Jean! I’m a taller Dramatic Classic and my Body Matrix results are spot on! I got a lot of Medium mixed with Narrow, Long and Straight: Medium(Narrow), Long(Medium), Straight(Medium)
@elizabethgaldamez17296 ай бұрын
I wish a system would mention side-view of body shapes as well… some people have a lot of roundness that isn’t visible from a perfectly straight straight angle in front of them
@desireemensah6 ай бұрын
Yesss!!!! And maybe also something to do with torso or bottom lengths
@elizabethgaldamez17296 ай бұрын
@@desireemensah I am 5’11” but in pictures, no one guesses I’m that tall! I’ve got “short” legs, proportionally, and a long torso. Also, equal hip and shoulder width from the front, but a “rear” that must be accommodated!
@elizabethgaldamez17296 ай бұрын
I have to buy Tall Curvy pants or they will NOT fit in rise and will have a huge gap in the back due to rear-side curve. That VERY necessary curve allowance would never be noticed in front-facing-only assessment systems.
@desireemensah6 ай бұрын
@@elizabethgaldamez1729 dear peachie has a video on body proportions that considers the side profile
@psyche81875 ай бұрын
Yep
@beatrizandreaortizfernande84426 ай бұрын
Girl, you have cracked the system! This is, at least for me, the most useful body typing system I have ever encountered! Incredible! Patent it! I am mind blown right now 🤯
@halez14076 ай бұрын
Oh I am the 'wide, long, round' woman who is never sure if I am soft dramatic or flamboyant natural 😂. Love this, thankyou ❤
@tigercomet236 ай бұрын
I’m wide, medium, and round, and I have struggled so much with the Kibbe types because I have the roundness and waspish waist of romantic/TR, but not the delicate bones. I’m too wide! And I have so much width that I’d consider Soft Natural, but I don’t have that boyish frame with the tapered waist. But this matrix system is so much easier to follow.
@june7rose5 ай бұрын
FN
@TinaB.-fr1hl6 ай бұрын
You should patent this system because it makes perfect sense. It reminds me of the way David Zyla uses the natural colours that show up in our skin/eyes/hair to find our most flattering colours. It makes sense that we'd look to the lines of our bodies to find the perfect shapes! There's a book by Nancy Nix-Rice called Looking good everyday that touches a bit on this concept of matching body lines in our clothing, but with your attention to detail and creative imagination, you could flesh out the 27 possible combinations with tips on best items to dress them. This is an exciting concept and has so much potential. Great job!👍
@SeaBaby-rk7ew6 ай бұрын
You might also like Doris Pooser’s body types (Straight, Straight Soft, Soft Straight, and Curved….) although I think the Body Matrix tops even that!
@teodorasavova29136 ай бұрын
Please make combinations with medium, I love your concept it seems to make a lot of sense, so far I figured out I may be narrow, medium and rounded.
@palomapardo17442 ай бұрын
Same for me! I've struggled so hard trying to figure if i'm a soft classic or soft gamine. I don't have a classic face, and i do have a somewhat Gamine face but i lack the round big eyes and i'm always confused. Íbamos tried the soft natural lines and they complete overpowered me (which makes sense since i'm Narrow framed). Finally some sense
@HarmonyLotus6 ай бұрын
This is much simpler than the Kibbe body types. I am definitely short and round, but I have some parts of me that are wide and others narrow. I realise now why I look my best when I mix up both wide and narrow lines, especially when adding accessories and jewellery.
@SatipatthanaSakuraDragona6 ай бұрын
This! I just posted something similar. I am definitely narrow and straight, but I have to contrast short up top with length below. So I look my best when I have cropped tops and longer skirts/trousers. I need both at once.
@RuffiRaggaMuff6 ай бұрын
I came to this same conclusion as well when I actually measured my limb lengths! We are very mixed line so the aesthetic should mimic that 🥰
@michaelachatelle6 ай бұрын
Spot on. I'm narrow in frame but have relatively big hands and feet. I need to accommodate this in jewellery and footwear. So I can't say I'm either narrow or wide. I'm both.
@justinecoman54486 ай бұрын
This is my biggest gripe about the kibbe gamine family right here. If it’s a mix of yin and yang elements , gamine shouldn’t be limited to only petite people.
@katherineandini59626 ай бұрын
I can see this system working for men too! Especially when deciding the cut of shirts & jeans 🙂 Probably even suit!
@philippalincoln22626 ай бұрын
This is actually the best body typing system I have come across, you must have had a flash of genius! I don’t fit any of the Kibbe body types and actively dislike that system. I knew immediately that I am short, narrow and curvy after years of trying wide silhouettes, chunky jewellery etc and always discarding them. It’s incredibly easy to remember and the bonus is there is still plenty of room to experiment with colours and styles within the general guidelines 🎉😊
@kelliehorn10826 ай бұрын
This is so much simpler, more user-friendly, and more inclusive than Kibbe! I love it! Nicely done, Ellie Jean!
@TiffanyandMor6 ай бұрын
Kinda don’t understand the length column for some of the body parts. Can you explain how length would correspond to the hips, chest, and shoulders?
@elliejeanroyden6 ай бұрын
This seems somewhat intuitive for me as I do line drawings everyday, but yes I can see that this would need further explanation! It's worth saying you could leave some of the boxes blank; yes, length for shoulders is not as important as width and shape for shoulders. The further explanation: - length of hips would be from the waist to just above the knee - length of chest would be length from armpit point to the waist - length of shoulders - from top of the shoulder to the top of the armpit point (some people this space is minute, others very long)
@ngaiosbrain6 ай бұрын
I reached this same conclusion six months ago when I couldn't work out SN or SG! I realised I could take from each as long as my words were "short, wide, wobbly"
@RuffiRaggaMuff6 ай бұрын
😂😂😂 This speaks to me as a petite wide girl 😍
@shelleygoodwin63716 ай бұрын
It probably comes down to your height (which if you're quite average in height that may not help) and your overall essence. I think this new method may help a lot of people that are struggling to get the kibbe system, and to be fair even when celebrities are used as examples they are usually the most obvious examples. The average person is probably going to be even harder to place! For me when I'm confused between a couple different kibbe types I tend to go back to specific clothing that I know I look good in and working backwards, and pin pointing some hacks that really seem to make the difference between what clothes suit us. Chances are SN and SG are going to have at least some clothes that work for both, or a lot of clothes are going to have features that could arguably suit either, you have to pin point what would work for one but not the other. For SN I'm imagining long, almost cascading hems and dresses and cardigans, very flowy items and potentially a lot of neutral colours and either a very boho aesthetic, athletic aesthetic or even more of a mushroom inspired kind of corporate look. SG I'm thinking the opposite of neutrals, probably colours, more bold and vibrant and contrasting. Short, somewhat structured somewhat soft but definitely not flowy. Either a kind of cute, sun inspired, bold and quirky vibe or a cute, soft and dainty vibe.
@g3andrea6 ай бұрын
I totally get what you are saying! I am short, wide, and square (but with the softness that comes with age).
@RuffiRaggaMuff6 ай бұрын
@@shelleygoodwin6371 and since I’m a cross of both I look good I the vibey boho some short some long some soft some texture some structure
@estherhinds63146 ай бұрын
Wobbly?
@EmL-kg5gn6 ай бұрын
I really like how this lets you see the overall picture but also identify areas that might be an exception, for example someone might mostly be short but have a long torso they need to account for. Or be mostly narrow but have width in the shoulders that they might want to accommodate with their necklines. I feel very confused about what I am (other than round) but I think that’s mostly because of residual confusion caused by other systems and the difficulties of viewing myself objectively
@evirenka6 ай бұрын
Exactly. Unfortunately my body type is quite contrasted and I don't get clear results. I am mostly short and narrow, but I have long torso and wide hips which are my more prominent features. But I guess it's useful to know what kind of features I have to accomodate when shopping for pants or tops for example. Short skirts, small details, sharp tops without cleavage.
@melialaa6 ай бұрын
I'm mostly narrow but have very wide shoulders. And big breasts with a narrow ribcage. Trying to find my body type was super confusing because based on my measurements I was pear shaped, but I never looked pear shaped 😅 so I've just followed the advice for an hourglass and tried to hide my shoulder width as much as possible. Still have no idea what Kibbe type I am either, I settled for "dramatic classic with extra shoulder" based mainly on wishful thinking x) trying to see yourself objectively is super duper hard. Atleast my colour season was easy to find, because other than that I'm stumped.
@EmL-kg5gn6 ай бұрын
@@melialaa I swear big breasts narrow ribcage is such a confusing combo, I’m the same. I relate to your confusion! My measurements are hourglass. In Kibbe’s system I have to be a tall type even though where I’m from I’m actually a little below average height. I gave up on the categories and looked at the components. I definitely have to accommodate curve or everything looks off. But I don’t suit contrast like a gamine, I’m certainly not balanced or petite, I don’t have to accommodate width or vertical and I look silly if I try. But if my only accommodation is curve then I’m a romantic, but I can’t be since I’m too tall! Also don’t ask me about whether I have double curve, I kind of get it but it’s difficult to judge on myself and once again I’m too tall anyway. It’s so confusing!
@SatipatthanaSakuraDragona6 ай бұрын
You're definitely onto something with this conception. When I learned about Kibbe, I went to stores, tried on a lot of random stuff, took pictures, then compared those pictures until I found the things that consistently worked or didn't work. It doesn't seem to mesh with any type from Kibbe's system. I need structured/tailored pieces, closely fitted, with stiffer fabric. That sounds like a dramatic, but I'm short and definitely have petite. I also seem to have some vertical. That would indicate FG, but prints and contrasting an oversized top versus bottom (or vis versa) does not look good on me, which is kind of the whole point of FG dressing. But dramatic and DC lines are too long for me (I start to resemble one of those inflatable floppy balloon stick figures and/or I look like a kid playing dress up in grown up clothes) and color blocking works well on me. I've been thinking of myself more as a petite dramatic (like some other FG women in the same boat). My one criticism I'd have with your conception is that I think my issue is that my petite comes from my top half and my slight vertical comes from my bottom half. Adult hats, collars, lapels, and sleeve lengths are too big for me and generate that kid in grown up clothes look. On the other hand, I have a lot elongation in my rise, so I need a rise of 11" for jeans to hit me at my belly button (mid-rise). I'm 5' 3.5". That's... extreme. At the same time, my hips are so straight (upper and lower hip are the same measurement), so that also generates the teenagery/childish look to my frame, especially when paired with shorter arms. I look great in shorter shorts, but cropped jeans or trousers are not great on me. I've been looking at my FG contrast as cropped up top (short) paired with longer lengths below (long). As someone with Mountain - Mushroom - Stone roots, one of my most casual and relaxed looks is a cropped sleeveless stiff/thick t-shirt (short) paired with a thick pencil skirt (with a bit of stretch) that hits me around knee length (long) and narrow tennis shoes (like vans or adidas sambas). I've also found shirt dresses that are above the knee make my torso look very wide and my arms and legs look stick-like. But if I go for a maxi length shirt dress (long) and the waist and sleeve length hits me properly (short), gravity pulls down the fabric to fit me narrowly. So I'm cropped at the top half and have length in the lower half. It's just something I'm finding that consistently solves problems because it's just a function my how my frame is put together. Things look better when I mirror short up top and long below and narrow all over in my outfits. I'm not sure how your system accounts for needing both, short and long, in different parts of your silhouette. It's something to think about because I think a lot of shorter women struggle with this, and I don't think it's as simple as "choose one". Choosing one would not work for me. I need to honor both.
@user-xg8qj4nz2h6 ай бұрын
Thank you!! I'm short too (5'2) and I'm a TR and I find the exact same issues. My torso is short and my legs are long, my bone structure is narrow but I have big boobs/hips. I find the same thing as you to balance these contrasting features.
@JuliaKirsty6 ай бұрын
But maybe it is as simple as this: Just go with what your body offers you. Mimic exactly those lines and shapes, no matter where they occur. I've read about people who are narrow and straight up top but have a VERY curvy hip and can't just go with straight lines. So they might be best of with going with straight lines up top and curved lines on the bottom. I think what does make Kibbe's system more complicated is the fact that it DOES include essence too. And if you give off a certain vibe this might draw him to give you another ID than your body's proportions might suggest. This is just a vague thought of mine, I for sure don't actually KNOW this. I remember how I thought about myself "I am kind of medium all the way" and that was when I was only 17 years old. Everything about me was about average besides having a smaller bust and a bit of a wider lower hip. When I grew older (I'm 36 now) I started to loose baby fat and shift my shape a bit. My bust is still small but my shoulders balance out my hips very nicely now. Nothing really sticks out, but I have slightly longer legs. Not enough to call for obvious vertical, but enough to say it's a tad bit more than "medium" or "moderate". What I do struggle with is when garments are constructed for tapered shoulders as mine are super straight and rather squared than rounded, they've always been that way, even when I was a tiny little kid. All these features made me go for DC lines in Kibbe and they work perfectly for me. It took me 8 years to figure that out though because I was VERY biased about my own body AND typed incorrectly by someone else. Ellie-Jean's system is more simple to understand and does give you an overall outline for what works best for your frame. It leads me to the same silhouettes and lines that Kibbe's system would suggest for me personally. I would say, if your upper body is short and your lower body is long, just mimic it as you already do. You don't have to stick to a system that doesn't work for you imho. But you can still learn from it to help you out in understanding your body's lines and silhouette. In the end it is all about accomodations for your body to make clothes fit right on you and fall down nicely on your body while going with its own individual features instead of trying to make you look "more hourglass". That's my overall take on this and maybe it helps to hear another perspective. Maybe we think kinda alike, maybe we don't.
@PunkRockerFairy6 ай бұрын
I wish you would also talk about what to do of you are medium in these categories
@elizabethm71636 ай бұрын
She will. It's a new system she just came up with. She'll get there in time!
@stephaniebateman26376 ай бұрын
What if I have contrasting features in the same category? For me, I have width in my shoulders and chest, but my limbs are all narrow? My hands and feet are medium. My hips are medium. Am I medium in the width category? I don’t feel medium. I feel conflicted 😂
@spacebar97336 ай бұрын
You and I having the same measurements ✋🏾😭
@RexytheRexy6 ай бұрын
The technique of taking a photo and breaking up the body helped SO much. The way I perceived myself was wide, long, round - after taking a photo and outlining/circling, I turned out to be narrow/long/straight. Huge surprise. It looks like I'm a 5'8" Kibbe Dramatic with some roundness in the hips and a smallish waist, but straight and narrow everywhere else. My first clue should have been the fact that I dress like a Dramatic (with some flowy fabric here and there, but in classic Dramatic cuts), and get lots of compliments on it. This system you've come up with accounts for the natural variation in every body, and provides really good tips for accenting those features. Seriously. Thank you.
@madmoony66 ай бұрын
I love this. I’m SG for sure but I very often find myself gravitating towards TR recs, so framing it as just “narrow, short, round” gives so much room to play!!
@Carina_Rose6 ай бұрын
And no gatekeeping this way! LOL
@Peachynabi6 ай бұрын
Yes same!!
@JuliaKirsty6 ай бұрын
To be perfectly honest: I find it quite hard to differentiate between SG and TR anyways. They both have opposing features and both have petite + curve. They can wear similar lines and clothes, the differences are in the very details imho. And I think you CAN wear TR lines as a SG but maybe accessorize differently and create a slightly different overall feel. And this difference would come down to "vibe" rather than "shape", at least imho. Correct me if I'm on the wrong track here, that's just my recent perspective which is not set in stone.
@madmoony66 ай бұрын
@@Carina_Rose yes!! Like the idea that TR can’t be “cute and playful” or SG can’t be “sexy femme fatale” 🙄🥴
@madmoony66 ай бұрын
@@JuliaKirsty in kibbe terms I think they are still different - I know I’m SG because, even though I have petite and double curve, my bone structure is more angular and sharp than TR. But I still think I look good in a lot of TR recs and they can rock SG recs. The differences aren’t obvious to most people
@robynmc246 ай бұрын
So excited to try this out! Seems so much more straightforward and customisable compared to other systems.
@SaraMuzi6 ай бұрын
Hi Ellie-Jean! I'm Kibbe soft dramatic and have found focusing on lines much more helpful than focusing on his archetype recommendations (dislike "diva"), so I think the main concept of the matrix does it job well, especially for those that struggle to find their place in Kibbe types. In your matrix I think I am narrow, long and round, which works. However I find that both narrow and wide necklines and pants can suit me (wide pants but not skirts, boat necklines as well as V necks, wide sleeves definitely, etc.). I also need bigger accessories, especially rings (no dainty ones for me despite being narrow, since I am "large"). Although it's easier to find the type in the matrix, there's more confusion in implementation in my experience, than from Kibbe that has more specific recommendation like V necks and boatneck, but not crewnecks. Now, this could be fixed if I say I'm actually not narrow but medium in the matrix. Or if I say that certain wide elements fit me because I am round and long, despite being narrow. Or the matrix could be further improved by more nuance in the implementation part, esp. if you are in some ways bigger (like length) and in some ways smaller (like width). Just a limitation I wanted to share from one of the types, that you could think about :) all the best!
@Nerdy-By-Nature4 ай бұрын
So I *think* boatnecks are actually considered narrow, because they come up high. V-necks work with long. It was very very briefly mentioned that if you're long you would choose larger shapes/patterns. This may help with some of the confusion. I'm also SD and fall into Long-Narrow-Round, leaning medium in some areas, and I was giving this all a lot of thought. But I definitely think you're right in that more specifics would be good. For instance off the shoulder usually looks smashing on SD, but perhaps that's coming from "round" rather than "wide". There are likely crossover elements at play. Curious about the wide leg pants - do they suit you only if the width falls within the frame of your hips and shoulders? I find if the pants are wider than my shoulders/hips they look *very* not flattering, and a skinny leg looks better in comparison. I think I only get away with it a *little* more in dresses, because there's automatic elongation in a one piece outfit.
@dawgcatcha19076 ай бұрын
ELLIE JEAN GURL ! Youre killin it out here. Leaving the style world way better than when you found it. I will buy your book one day!!!
@FilippaSkog6 ай бұрын
A few of them are hard to understand. What would short/long shoulders, bust (would that be the torso?) and hips look like? Also, I have the typical gamine feature of soft upper arms/thighs and sharp (straight, I guess?) lower arms/wrists and calves/ankles. Would arms and legs be considered medium then? They really aren’t…
@christinevanpatten12786 ай бұрын
I have tapered limbs so I relate to this struggle. The upper parts of my limbs are larger and much more round than my wrists and ankles which are very dainty
@lovejoy76 ай бұрын
mmm i’m wondering if it’s the difference between having a strong shoulder line across which would be longer vs. sloped shoulders which would be shorter. both can be wide or narrow over all. but idk
@FilippaSkog6 ай бұрын
@@christinevanpatten1278 Right, tapered limbs is the phrase I'm looking for! That's what I have, too.
@ChronicallyofflineRavenclaw6 ай бұрын
As a flamboyant natural with curves and huge hips who has been struggling on how to both compliment my shoulder and hips without looking frumpy- this has changed my life lol
@dahliaherrod43012 ай бұрын
Michelle Obama has your exact same features and she has great style. I say check out her fashion as a possible inspiration.
@dominiquenorman39136 ай бұрын
This seems really interesting ! I’ll be honest, when you first announced that you’d been working on your own body typing system & mentioned concepts like width, I was concerned about the potential for it to seem somewhat .. plagiarised ? But hearing you talk about it now I don’t think that’ll be an issue. I appreciate you recognising the value in Kibbe while offering a different approach - not to replace it, but to complement it. It seems you’ve taken care to go about it respectfully & not purely motivated by financial gain (as evidenced also by your style scholars pricing & your clear genuine enthusiasm for fashion & helping others). It’s very refreshing 💜
@IzziiElliott6 ай бұрын
Love this concept, but I've always struggled with width categorisation, I have narrow shoulders & torso, hands & feet, but wide hips and limbs, and it's hard to tell what comes across as more dominant. What would you put more emphasis on?
@palomapardo17442 ай бұрын
I would put it on frame features like shoulders, hips and chest, them limbs (arms and legs) and lastly hands and feet.
@LibbyStephenson6 ай бұрын
What does it mean to have short vs long shoulders? Is it how much they slope?
@silverhiver6 ай бұрын
Tbh I think the length is redundant in a lot of the categories. Can't really have "long" hips or shoulders. She's only recently come up with this so probs just not quite perfected it yet. I'd look for length in hands/feet/arms/legs and maybe torso or overall appearance of height
@spacebar97336 ай бұрын
My trapezius to the start of my boob fat is how I measured it. I would have to wear a very very low cut shirt to see any cleavage, vs some ppl have higher boob fat. This is just my guess lol. And long hips would be your pelvis I believe.
@marianynobre7593Күн бұрын
Literally you saved my life! I've always got so confused with kibbe, this was just so much easier to understand and analyse. Thank you so much Ellie-Jean, you are an angel of the fashion girlies.
@drodlaren6 ай бұрын
Glad to be one of the examples BUT what does length in shoulders mean? Some of these aren’t making sense as i’d never think to describe certain things as short or long or round or straight? Hope im making sense!
@LeireFB6 ай бұрын
I interpreted it as if the vertical line between the top of my shoulders to the beggining of my armpits feels long or short in contrast to the rest of my body shapes/lines
@stop_talkingg6 ай бұрын
Question then - how do we go about the Mediums? I am Narrow, Short and then Medium for Round/Sharp. Do you go rounder on body areas that are rounder and then sharper/medium on body areas that are more sharp/medium?
@laurlovess6 ай бұрын
Wide medium and round here, always felt between soft natural and soft classic, this is so helpful. Love that you admit bodies change as well, much more realistic & approachable
@forbesia6 ай бұрын
Wide-medium-rounds unite!! Same situation with not feeling fully SN/SN and then a minute when I thought 100% I was a Romantic (the Kate Winslet kind)
@rebekahptravisphotography93646 ай бұрын
I filled this out but I don’t think it works for gamines. My arms and legs are literally short versus long at different parts. (I am short from shoulder to elbow, long from elbow to fingertip - so I went with medium) We have an insane mix of opposites - short and long, round and straight, wide and narrow lol. I ended up with medium, medium, straight but I have everything scattered in the matrix
@tjohannam6 ай бұрын
My body matrix would be wide, medium length, round (soft natural kibbe, height 167 cm/5"5) 😊🌼 I love how simple and straightforward your system is!
@ElliiiBlabla6 ай бұрын
Same! Only that I am a few cm shorter 😊
@michelagirotto61846 ай бұрын
If you also have 32DD boobies we can be soft natural twins ❤ lol
@estherflores43736 ай бұрын
This is brilliant!!! You made it so easy to self analyze your body. I'd love to see videos or pintrest boards with examples for all the combinations in the body matrix.
@SeaBaby-rk7ew6 ай бұрын
Yes yes yes
@Whimsydaisy6 ай бұрын
Ellie.. I love this! It's so much more straightforward! In Kibbe, I'm lost between SN, SG, SC.. so mix of yin/yang basically. With your system I'm realizing my body is very narrow and rounded but with possible/ probable width in my upper back shoulders. This is why I'm loving this system because for people like me (and a lot of people) we don't fit neatly into one type. Can't wait to see more about this!
@trishhykes55746 ай бұрын
What if you think you’re mainly medium for width and length? Should I force myself into one option or the other? I did the line drawing but I feel like I’m quite proportional overall so I find it hard to pick one extreme or the other!
@yasemeenelson64956 ай бұрын
Same issue! How in the world do you dress for medium? 😅
@abigailrosen42936 ай бұрын
How does this work for mismatched/gamine people?
@aliciasilva55786 ай бұрын
This is just BRILLIANT! I was waiting for someone to create such a clear, practical and inclusive systems. ❤
@elliejeanroyden6 ай бұрын
Thank you so much, I am so pleased to see that this framework can be helpful!
@littlemage35236 ай бұрын
I really like the simple logic behind this, but I have 3 problems with the application. First would be.. some parts are very unintuitive to put on this chart (how can feet be round? How can shoulders be long? xD). Second would be, everything seems to count equal? But I just don't see how your hand lenght can/should count the same as your actual height for example - I have quite long hands for my own proportions, they won't suddenly make long lines ok on my 5'1 body with size 10 years old inseam.. Third, it doesn't seem to account for diametrically opposite answers. I would have narrow shoulders wide bust wide hips narrow legs wide hands narrow feet..How am I supposed to decide between the 2 extremes when I have equal number of both?
@catrocastre82156 ай бұрын
Wow, Ellie, I reckon this is an upgrade from the fashion masters (Kibbie and Kitchener), like the apprentice has become the máster.I
@susanstephan76896 ай бұрын
Something I’d like to add about width because it’s something that took me a long time to understand: I’m fairly petite by most people’s standards (but not petite in Kibbe’s system) so outside of these style systems, no one would look at me and describe me as wide. However, when I go shopping for clothes, I have to look for open necklines and forgiving fabrics or I need to size up in tops because I have wide shoulders for someone who wears my clothing size. Sometimes you have to ignore the word’s typical meaning and think of it in terms of how clothing fits you.
@rebekahe9692Ай бұрын
WOW! I have been so confused by kibbe, and this makes so much more sense. I just did the quiz and checked out your Pinterest board - sure enough medium, long, & straight contains exactly the kind of outfits I gravitate towards. I no longer feel like I’m going crazy!
@DesignDanielle13 күн бұрын
Definitely need an in depth tutorial ! line drawing picture side by side with the chart Q: Compared to what are you determining width , length & shape Ex. How do you determine length of chest and hips ???
@Wenixi5 ай бұрын
You know what. I love this. Need to digest for some time. I figured out something while making my body matrix. I thought why doesn't it suit to my whole body? - I got my body type short, but short skirts and shorts look bad on me. But then cropped and boxy tops look very good on me! - Also I got my body type narrow, but my hips and legs are nothing but narrow. Again my upper body and hands are narrow! So then I understood that my upper and lower body needs to have their own matrixes! I think it makes sense. My upper body is narrow, short, medium while my lower body is wide, medium, round. What a wicked thing! 😁❤️
@palomapardo17442 ай бұрын
Same here! I Guess that's why i also resonated with Gamine lines, a mixture of ying and yang all over My body
@char3926 ай бұрын
I'm a 5'2 Romantic, and look good in sleeves and cuffs that go in at the wrists and ankles, but I got a lot of wide answers 🤔😅. I also like elongating my lines to feel more elegant. Guess I'm just difficult 😂
@valeriemalenfant6 ай бұрын
Nice!!! I ‘m wide-short-straight and you are spot on with what I think look nice on me !
@wyntersunrose691023 күн бұрын
I love this system! I felt like a never really understood why and outfit was this kibbe ID or that one, this makes so much more sense to me! I feel like I can actually look and pieces or outfits and see what categories they fall into
@g3andrea6 ай бұрын
Wide, Short, and Straight (LOL)! I do have to be careful about going too cropped with tops and pants, because they can accentuate my boxy shape (with a full bosom). I can end up looking like a barrel instead of a rectangle body. But, this is overall good advice when searching for clothing shapes that will actually fit my body without having to do extensive alterations. Also softer fabrics that drape and shape to my body in straighter silhouettes (reducing width instead of adding to it) along with chunkier jewelry and geometric patterns really do work for me. Great job!
@taylorstephensen-beal539125 күн бұрын
So helpful! Bridging the gap that Kibbe leaves out!
@nublock50006 ай бұрын
Wow, I feel so seen by this video! I was just talking last night about how I don't really fit into the Kibbe system because I have unmistakable width and vertical but also an obvious hourglass curve that persists regardless of weight gain or loss, meaning that I probably fit nicely into the first "wide, long, round" category you described. The "loose, straight, flowing" lines typically recommended for flamboyant naturals don't work on me at all. The wide necklines and chunky jewelry are must-haves, but I suffer massively without waist emphasis and consider it essential for a good look. I have found A-line skirts and bootcut trousers to be the most flattering cuts on the bottom half and do much better with open, angular necklines (cowl necks, boat necks, square, sweetheart, V-neck, etc.). Not only do I look awful in crewneck, mock turtleneck, and turtleneck styles, but they are never cut with sufficient width to fit my shoulders anyway. Buying long sleeves with long-enough sleeves is a perpetual struggle. Really looking forward to you exploring this concept further in the future! Thanks for thinking of us tall, curvy girls with broad shoulders!
@mariselagutierrez46846 ай бұрын
This is the video I've been waiting for! And I'm happy it's coming from a source that's reasonable and non-judgmental like you 💕
@peachiethecat6 ай бұрын
Could you give an example of what kinds of "medium" length pieces would look like? I have long arms and a long vertical line but am not necessarily tall. Would something like a midi dress be ideal? What about ankle length pants (as opposed to long, floor dusting or culottes?)
@nicolei40486 ай бұрын
I like this new matrix design for body typing but I still find myself struggling between recommendations. I have wide shoulder so I definetly have width, but i have very narrow hips (typical inverted triangle) and i hate how i feel when i wear things that enhance my upper body width.
@michellita1824 ай бұрын
Speaking as a 5'7.5" lady who's clung onto soft natural, I think this system is so simple and easy to get! I love your application
@ucanmakethat6 ай бұрын
I think I'm medium - short - medium 🤔 and with this video I got a general idea what that means for my silhouette, but I'm looking forward to more videos with examples for your Body Matrix system and what medium means 🥰
@brooke98476 ай бұрын
While I love your approach and your system I would say there is an argument that you wouldn't always want to mimic your features. For instance, I have short legs and a long torso. I wear outfits that counter these features to elongate me, not to mimic them. Love the scientific approach to clothing!
@livelaughloveakhi6 ай бұрын
This is very helpful because I think I’m wide long and round and people always used to say not to wear off the shoulder tops or wide trousers because of my broad shoulders and fatter body but I actually think it’s more harmonious that way!
@colourmerightАй бұрын
Thanks for the breakdown, Ellie-Jean. Leaning towards wide medium round... I am never sure how wide it has to be to be called wide.
@cherry-xz6ei6 ай бұрын
Man I am overwhelmed
@wrendor94656 ай бұрын
I love this body matrix system. I hope you make more videos on this topic. 😊❤
@blushampoo1626 ай бұрын
I love the streamlined matrix! I’m 5’10 and always had a defined waist and wider hips even as an athlete but I’m heavier than I used to be and struggled with kibble since my legs can sometimes look shorter than my torso, love the inclusion of simple details!!
@LittleMissHoop6 ай бұрын
Hmmm, I appreciate that this is trying to simplify things but this is basically like going back to how we used to think BEFORE more sophisticated typing sytems like Kibbe (not that it's perfect but it's a more sophisticated and elaborate system). So it feels like regressing to a simplistic way of looking at body types. I do agree with the weight comments. And I do like this channel!
@melissaschimkat86746 ай бұрын
Since you analysed the different features separately on what kind of width/length/shape they have, could you imagine using your Body Matrix system more as a: dress each individual feature based on what results it got, or do you think it should ultimately come down to what length/width/shape you feature most in your body and then dress everything according to that? 😊 really interested in your opinion!
@alexiavp95196 ай бұрын
Love it! I'm waiting for the variations for short frames 🤩
@karenlien1900Ай бұрын
This is really brilliant. Thank you for sharing your gift! I’m a soft gamine and Kibbe has been useful for me. In the Body Matrix System I’m narrow long round. It’s new for me to think of myself as long, I’m just 5’4” but as I look at my different parts they do look elongated. It’ll be interesting to bring this is my style. Maybe I am more etheric than I noticed before. Love how you get us thinking for ourselves and teach us how to SEE and FEEL. We used to think someone had a “sense of style” or they didn’t but you are teaching us that it’s an intuitive sense that can be developed. I just love what you’re doing and you’re really helping me understand what style even means. Thank you!
@hindiepindie6 ай бұрын
I’m only at 3:59 and this makes so much more sense! I have a hard time to judge met overall shape, and breaking it down helps a lot.
@pdk9903Ай бұрын
Really interesting! Makes really a lot of sense to me. I have long arms and legs, wide shoulders and a full bosom and a bit of a tummy, so I'd think I was long-wide-round? My facial features are prominent but not angular. Very tailored clothes look too strict on me; I need some softness in the details, like a puffed sleeve, a boat neck or scoop neck under a blazer in stead of a classic shirt, or softer rounding in the lapels etc. I tend to accentuate my legs with either quite long or short bottoms, maybe even something above the ankle, but mid-calf, knee-length or just above is a no-go 😅. So short shorts or longer trousers. Thanks for great content! 😊
@rorolilred6 ай бұрын
Ooh exciting! I think I'd be narrow, long, and round 🤔
@Orozco37216 ай бұрын
Me too I was like is this possible haha how tall are you? I'm 5'8
@Incityandinforest5 ай бұрын
I’m wide-ish, short and round. I consider myself a romantic in kibbe. My shoulders are very rounded and medium size but closed neck are not a good for me. My bust looks very constricted and it creates a heaviness vs an open neckline. Thanks Ellie! I think this is great for people who feel in between kibbe types. It takes away the headache of trying to figure your overall “vibe” and more focus on finding clothes that actually fit.
@yaynielle6 ай бұрын
this helped me so much to type me in the kibbe system! i’m a “wide, medium, straight” with long limbs and hands and a shorter torso (i’m 5’2), and i also have a boxy appearance with some curve to it (like a small waist and wide but straighter hips). describing the features by themselves and then looking at the whole frame made me figure out I’m a flamboyant gamine. thanks ellie!
@garderie55406 ай бұрын
You’re incredibly talented at what you do. You have an eye for fashion like I’ve never seen before :)
@goumashoe6 ай бұрын
This makes a lot of sense! I couldn’t really explain why I disliked long cardigans on me, but now I know it has to do with my short lines!
@leneahhamelgoudy88766 ай бұрын
There was another KZbinr who put forth a similar theory to use, if people were confused using body typing systems. I tried tracking down the video, but all I have are some screen shots of her recommendations on a Pinterest board. She had Short vs. Tall, Narrow vs. Wide (but she just used shoulders to determine this), and Curve dominate (Round) vs. Frame dominate (Straight). I've been using Short, Narrow, Curve (Round) to pick out clothing items for a while, and have improved my style so much! I'm so happy you are bringing this to the mainstream! :) I love using your style root system to further personalize my style (I gravitate towards a combination of flower, earth, and mushroom). If I am missing one of the style roots in my outfit, it feels like something is missing. The same goes for the silhouette system. If I don't follow it in my outfits, something feels a bit off. I admit, it does take some playing around with it to get it right. Usually, I can have pieces which don't follow all the rules, if the rest of the outfit follows most of them. That way, I can shop my existing wardrobe to create different looks which follow most of the rules, without completely replacing my wardrobe.
@loveandpeacepie6 ай бұрын
Hmm 🤔 I think you are onto something here. You might just have cracked the system. That was ridiculously easy and helpful well done
@rebeccabrown77042 ай бұрын
Question: Once you've determined your 3 characteristics, would it be helpful to determine the most dominant one? For example, I would have narrow to medium width, short-ish vertical line, and 100% curvy. I would say curve is my dominant trait by a landslide. So, if you're wide width, tall vertical, AND curvy, maybe determining your most dominant trait would help? If I put myself on a continuum rather than a binary system, I'd be 66% towards narrow, 70% toward short, and 100% curvy. This determines my dominant trait, and the thing that is most essential to accommodate in my frame. Thoughts? This makes me a Theatrical Romanic on the Kibbe system. All my lines look like circles with points on two ends - like a short ellipse, or a lemon. I just think ranking your most dominant trait would be VERY helpful and then considering the others next in your lines.
@lilygreen400021 күн бұрын
I love this! I finally found out I am narrow long and round! ♡
@imagease4 ай бұрын
Have you mapped out how these correlate to Kibbe? I'm an FN and in your system would be wide, long and medium. Using your concept of wide seems much easier to implement than Kibbe's. I always had a hard time figuring out how to "honor my width", but naturally have gravitated towards long wide legged pants, boat neck tops, and flowier fabrics. Makes perfect sense now. Write a book!
@Pandodede6 ай бұрын
OH GOD !! I loved kibbe's model but I thought it could be represented differently and your matrix is exactly about that ! So helpful !
@thea.94606 ай бұрын
this breakdown helped me understand sooo much clearer than other videos/people. there is just so much on the internet about these things ans a lot of it can be wrong or misleading. this is a wonderful video and i especially appreciate the comment about weight gain near the end, i found it very comforting ❤
@yasemeenelson64956 ай бұрын
Please do an in-depth video for those of us who are almost medium across the board. I got 10 mediums on my matrix and like one of each other thing lol. How do you dress for medium and show any kind of personal style?
@juliaw.31115 күн бұрын
I would love to see a video about wide + short + straight! There is only one celebrity example on your pinterest board, so it would be nice to get more examples
@ChronicallyofflineRavenclaw6 ай бұрын
You should do a full video on styling a wide, long, curvy. Since we have all been confused for so long on what to wear 😂 and could you also mention what swimsuits would look bets on us as well/ what kind of shorts we ought to wear in summer? Those are always tough for me!!
@mancillado4 ай бұрын
This was so helpful! I had the exact issue you described -- I am very tall but definitely have width but are a bit more curvy than most pictures I see of flamboyant naturals, but definitely not as curvy as the soft dramatics I see. You are a genius and I love your content
@Calida4 ай бұрын
I did this with a line drawing and zoomed wayyyy out to see the lines only vs my body and... it was so helpful! 😆😊
@peachy.dailyy6 ай бұрын
I love this matrix so much, thank you!! Been obsessed with your videos lately 💖 I’m medium-medium-medium 😆 Can you share or recommend what to wear for my type?? ❤❤
@chrischaos6846 ай бұрын
I'm also one of those "FN or SD" girls and this really helped me make sense of it it my own head 😅 It finally clicked for me that the number one baseline to this is "everything should be proportionate", ie thick banded rings for big hands will make them look proportionate while a thin band would showcase their size.... I feel silly right now honestly, but thanks to this, body typing is much easier for me to get my head around.
@emmaeriatarka22 күн бұрын
I'm basically narrow-medium-medium! Which probably explains why I'm so confused with Kibbe and have been going between TR and SC!
@Jules-7402 ай бұрын
This is so helpful! Thank you! Much easier than other body typing methods. Where do you shop for clothes? I like many of your items. I can't wait to use your features analysis!
@VerySimplyEl4 ай бұрын
Thank you! This is perfect for me, kibble never really worked for me. This I can work with 😁
@vikkic6 ай бұрын
This is brilliant! I’m so happy a woman is reclaiming this work!! Since not included, I’m assuming that torso to limb proportion doesn’t matter, or bust to waist to hips?
@kateyoung40214 ай бұрын
Hi Ellie! When you mention assigning “short” to your shoulders, could you share more what you mean? Do you mean vertical height in that beginning framework?
@elizabethm71636 ай бұрын
I saw your stories when you came up with this and I love that you've got it nailed down! This is so exciting. I love it.
@mariacorretge66156 ай бұрын
Amazing system. I'm taking the quiz now! I love how you simplify and analyse things, from the style roots (I'm mountain, sun, mushroom) , you've got a great brain!
@alex_the_confused_277316 күн бұрын
I have a few questions about my own results. How do you accommodate short while still being modest? And what if you have an even split of extremes? Like for me, I have an even split of curve and straightness.
@wyntersunrose69106 ай бұрын
This is so helpful! I have wide shoulders but also double curve, I have been going with a romantic body type but hope this can guide who I can honor the width in my frame!
@jules_2.06 ай бұрын
This is actually something I thought about before when trying to work out how Kibbe works. I felt there should be more like, scales you work out and then that gives you a matrix of outcomes, and that's exactly what you've done here. I think I'm wide-ish, short and round, and I'm romantic kibbe type.
@ymr80426 ай бұрын
As I was watching this video I thought to myself that my matrix would be Wide-Long-Round. Lo and behold your first outfit example was exactly that, and I'd have to say you really hit the nail on the head with those outfit choices😂 They are all in my wardrobe and my go to's for wearing and shopping for! I especially can't go wrong with coats and long flares, and sundresses with waist definition!
@ymr80426 ай бұрын
In other words, you have something here! Your system is very straightforward and more importantly, very adaptful for change as well! Consider patenting it or developing more content surrounding it 😊
@_K_h_u_s_h_i5 ай бұрын
Ellie, could you explain the terms width, length, shape of our body parts? I couldn't understand what length of shoulders or hips meant.
@ll-sw3tm6 ай бұрын
Excellent, Excellent video. This is so much more accessible than Kibbe and especially helpful for people in between body types. Ellie Jean, you are about to become the 21st century's "Kibbe". Well done🎉