Elon Musks Shocking New AI Prediction

Elon Musks Shocking New AI Prediction
Source : / 1737955665459417547
💬 Access GPT-4 ,Claude-2 and more - chat.forefront.ai/?ref=theaigrid
🎤 Use the best AI Voice Creator - elevenlabs.io/?from=partnerscott3908
✉️ Join Our Weekly Newsletter - mailchi.mp/6cf...
🐤 Follow us on Twitter / theaigrid
🌐 Checkout Our website - theaigrid.com/
Welcome to our channel where we bring you the latest breakthroughs in AI. From deep learning to robotics, we cover it all. Our videos offer valuable insights and perspectives that will expand your knowledge and understanding of this rapidly evolving field. Be sure to subscribe and stay updated on our latest videos.
Was there anything we missed?
(For Business Enquiries) [e-mail]
#LLM #Largelanguagemodel #chatgpt
#AI
#ArtificialIntelligence
#MachineLearning
#DeepLearning
#NeuralNetworks
#Robotics
#DataScience

[@primalplasma]

I am a software developer, and not even my coworkers realize what is coming. The project that I am working on now may be the last project of my career.

[@hervmusic]

Tell us more!

[@RogerMKE]

Right now we write software like this: (1) vague natural language instructions -> (2) very specific coding instructions -> (3) end product. What it will change to is: (a) very specific natural language instructions -> (b) end product. The first and second steps will be combined, and it will still require someone skilled enough to tell the AI precisely what is needed in the appropriate level of detail. Essentially, we will be programming in natural language.

[@PedroBaeta71]

Well I used to be a Software Head of Engineering and left the job to write code once again, all because of LLMs. My views is that software development was never as exciting and liberated as it will be in a very near future

[@stefanolacchin4963]

I was a software developer too and I'm very glad I changed course a few years back. That might have bought me a couple years. If you're still in the business though, I'm afraid you are kind of fudged.

[@primalplasma]

@@PedroBaeta71 I agree, but how many corporations will keep their entire IT and software development staff in order to create programs using natural language prompts? A lot of software developers will be laid off, and maybe even replaced by people who have no background whatsoever in software development. It's so easy to create a GPT using GPT Builder that it literally walks you through the process and asks you what you want, and even comes up with its own ideas. GPT will only get smarter with the release of GPT-5. It won't need us to write the prompts at all. A child will be able to write programs. There are a lot of corporate workers in departments other than IT and Software Development who can't wait to get rid of us geeky and awkward software developers. I think in the future, if we want to continue with software development, many of us will have to become entrepreneurs and start our own business or company.

[@christophedhondt3507]

Last week on a family weekend after I had some shots, I tried to enlighten the family and explain the future possibilities of AI and everybody was laughing and blamed it on the shots I had... Lots of people really don't know what's coming.

[@wjckc79]

It's going to be a shock. Personally, I have stopped trying to make predictions past this coming spring. It's going to be crazy, that much I know.

[@niveketihw1897]

I feel your frustration -- sounds like my world.

[@juliuscaesar5270]

I had the same experience soo many times…. It is so disappointing to see al the people not realising what is going on… don’t you agree?

[@keepinghurry9644]

2023 will probably be the last normal Christmas we will have

[@EarendilTheBlessed]

Funny how it's about exactly the same thing for climate change. Just that it's different people, reacting differently.

[@DaveEtchells]

People tend to underestimate the speed at which AI is/will be developing, but overestimate how rapidly it will be able to be integrated into business and society.

[@David.Alberg]

No integration will happen at lightning speed since everyone will be 100x faster but also 100x cheaper and 100x better.

[@MrSeadawg123]

​@@David.Alberg Just as we have a trickle down economy. We also have trickle down technology. We will be nowhere near the highend technology. You will see just good enough technology. Especially when it comes to cell phones.

[@David.Alberg]

@@MrSeadawg123 And you know why? Because its much more expensive and doesnt add too much value.

[@DaveEtchells]

@@David.Alberg I’m not talking about technological integration but societal. The tech parts will accelerate exponentially (as I said, much faster than most people are predicting), but human organizations have inertia. There’ll be big impacts in a 1-2 year time frame, but the really massive changes will take 5-10 years to develop fully. (40-50% unemployment, AI taxes, UBI, etc.) Mind you, that’s still much faster than society will be able to adapt, but not nearly as fast as the tech itself will advance.

[@ahtoshkaa]

@@DaveEtchells Exactly. It took years for people to adopt PCs even when we already had relatively good ones

[@diegopc1357]

To think more than 90% if not more of the population doesn't even know what's coming. That's the scary part. I mean honestly I see what we are on the cusp of and I myself am super overwhelmed.

[@STOW91]

It feels like im sinking into the ground. I always have valued myself as a provider for my family. This new adaptation is beyond anything our ancestors faced. We face a new species

[@RaptureHead1993]

Highway to hell stairway or stairway to heaven now picture appropriate traffic flow

[@user-eg3uc6nq2l]

A I merge with demonic. Uck. God still wins. Let's get rid of them!

[@conniemcclung338]

I understand it.

[@TheEpicNub]

These auto captions are not working man, you should really review them before posting a video lol.

[@daphne4983]

No they're funny when it's wrong

[@jerrywang9165]

Totally agree. Even when they are working, I often find them to be an annoying distraction.

[@solojo13]

Came to post the same, they're atrocious!

[@rahphion9645]

Lol. Captions where generated by AI.

[@jerontelle]

Not even the smartest AI is capable of understanding what Elon is saying...😂

[@DaveEtchells]

People won't seek the AI that's most truthful, they'll go for the one that tells them their biases are correct 🙁

[@othername2428]

Just wokie nutters. 80% of others, most normal rational people would prefer maximum truth seeking AI even if it contradicts their biases. I know I would.

[@senju2024]

You should have this PINNED at the top!

[@LoreFriendlyMusic]

I agree. This should be pinned to the top

[@DanielVoglerTime]

Private users probably yes, however any sort of professional / corporate setting needs to be able to rely on absolut non-hallucinated factual truth.

[@DaveEtchells]

@@DanielVoglerTime Tell that to all the DEI/ESG corporate leaders. They've been solidly in the realm of hallucinated truth for quite a while now, although the market is (very) slowly acting to correct that. People are depressingly prone to hallucination driven by cognitive bias 😕

[@shockruk]

Elon is waffling here. He rarely answers a technical question posed to him and just jumps on rhetoric and tangential interesting tid-bits. This has done nothing to improve my impression of him, or add credence to what he says.

[@cristristam9054]

He is a confidence guy not a technical guy.

[@RichardHarlos]

If you've spent any time reading about him to understand what's actually going on, you'd not have made such a shallow criticism. Public interviews are intended for public consumption. Many people who listen are not technologists, and would like to know what he thinks. If Elon's answers were as technical as you or I might prefer, we'd appreciate them more, but the bulk of the audience wouldn't know what he's talking about. So, yes, in some instances he does dumb-down the answers in a public setting. But if you listen to him in more technical venues, he's quite well-informed. No one is top-tier at everything. Perhaps he's not as skilled a communicator as you are, or as I am. If we are skilled in communication, then we know that encoding is only the beginning; decoding is also a factor, and as the audience, you and I are responsible for how sincerely and accurately we engage in decoding. And, if we're not sure what he means, we can ask for clarification. That's what people do when they sincerely want to understand the answer: they ask clarifying question. In contrast, those who just have some personal bias against Elon do... well, what you're doing, which is picking low-hanging fruit for criticism. If you want to learn about him as he is, then do the work and learn. Armchair criticism from random videos on KZbin is probably not the best strategy to get to know someone as they are. I mean, think about it: is the purpose of this KZbin channel to help people get to know Elon as he is? Probably not. Instead, it's probably doing what many AI channels are doing: riding the coattails of big names and hot topics. So, context matters... nuance matters... and, your own sincerity to understand matters.

[@MonkeySimius]

Well according to Elon Musk Robotaxi technology and FSD has been ready to go for about a decade now and will be implemented in the next 6 months for that entire time. So I'm sure his random thoughts about AI in general are really worth listening to because clearly he restrains himself to the truth without wild speculation and self serving lies.

[@DaveEtchells]

Yeah, he’s predicted that just about everything his companies were going to do would happen way before it did. OTOH, he’s vastly outperformed all the US car mfrs with EVs, and there isn’t even a close second to SpaceX when it comes to launch capacity. If you look around, it’s not just him saying the things he is about AI; anyone tracking the ever-increasing pace of development of AI is deeply concerned. I don’t know of anyone who’s in touch with the AI scene who doesn’t think we’ll have AGI within a year, and it’s highly likely that OpenAI has already seen some form of it in their labs. Hate on him all you like, but don’t stick your head in the sand about AI because of it.

[@RichardHarlos]

Monkey wrote, _"I'm sure his random thoughts about AI in general..."_ I suspect that very little of Elon's thoughts about AI are 'random'. Mon: _"...are really worth listening to..."_ They're almost certainly worth listening to. Even if you don't agree with everything, It's wise to stay informed about what other big players in the field are thinking, saying, and doing. Mon: _"...because clearly he restrains himself to the truth without wild speculation and self serving lies."_ So, the heart of your criticism is that he can't accurately predict the future? No human can do this. Some get lucky but no one gets it right all the time. And those who get it right sometimes probably have something more than sheer intelligence at their disposal. Questions about the future are, by definition, speculative. To point out that someone's vision of the future was wrong is... really, really low-hanging fruit. The real world is full of variables that are unidentified. Of those that are identified, not all are easily or accurately quantifiable. So the slightest change in any of those variables could be -- in fact, almost certainly is -- an example of the butterfly effect: small changes in complex systems can lead to wildly different outcomes. So your criticism might feel 'fun' for you but it makes you look envious.

[@StrangeAttractor]

he's also one of the most stumbling, bumbling inarticulate people with a major media platform, so I think I'll just skip the headache.

[@RuslanLagashkin]

Best comment so far. If Elon himself hypes the topic, we can be safe from AGSI for a decade at least

[@MK-we9sw]

​@@DaveEtchellshe has been saying FSD is coming for almost 10 years now. He said we would have a person on Mars by now. Don't get me started on the Hyperloop 😂

[@punk3900]

I've been coding in my natural language for a couple of months. It takes some patientce but the speed and outcomes are stunning.

[@arturfrenger]

How? Tutorial pls?

[@skoumastv]

This is the end

[@LyleCrumbstorm]

"It takes some patience" ...that's so 3-months ago. :)

[@Izumi-sp6fp]

This is kinda long, but I promise, worth your while. I wrote this originally as a self-post in rslashfuturology on 11 Sep 2023. "Wave" is not the right word here. The proper term is "tsunami". And by tsunami, I mean the kind of tsunami you saw when that asteroid hit the Earth in the motion picture, "Deep Impact". Remember that scene where the beach break was vastly and breathtakingly drawn out in _seconds_ ? That is the point where humanity is at this _very_ moment in our AI development. And the scene where all the buildings of NYC get knocked over _by_ that wave, a very short time later, is going to be the perfect metaphor for what happens to human affairs when that AI "tsunami" impacts. It may not be survivable. We are on the very verge of developing _true_ artificial general intelligence. Something that does not exist now and has not ever existed in human recorded history up to this point. One real drawback about placing my comment in this space is that I can't place any links here. So if you want to vet the things that I am telling you, you'll have to look up some things online. But we'll come to that. First, I want to explain what is _actually_ going on. As you know, in the last not quite one year since 30 Nov 22, when GPT 3.5, better known as ChatGPT was released, the world has changed astonishingly. People can't seem to agree over how long ChatGPT took to penetrate human society. I will, for arguments sake, say it took _15 days_ for ChatGPT from OpenAI, to be downloaded by 100 _million_ humans. But I have reason to believe the actual time was five days. And then on 14 Mar 23, GPT-4 was also released by OpenAI. Some things about GPT-4. When GPT-4 was still in its pre-release phase, there was a lot of speculation about just how powerful it would be compared to GPT 3.5. The number was stated to be roughly 100 _trillion_ parameters. The number of parameters in ChatGPT is 175 billion. Shortly after that number was published, that 100 trillion one, a strange thing happened. OpenAI said, well no, it's not going to be 100 trillion. In fact, it may not be much more than 175 billion even. (It was still pretty big though, 1.7 _trillion_ parameters.) This is because there had been another breakthrough in which parameters was not going to matter so much as a different metric. The new metric that was far more accurate to how the LLM model would perform when released. It was called "tokens". That is the, like, individual letter, word, punctuation or symbol, or whatever is input and then output. And is based on the training data required for a given LLM. It is what enables an LLM to "predict the next word or sequence". Like in the case of coding. I'm not even going to address "recursive AI development" here. I think it will become pretty obvious in a short time. The number of tokens for GPT-4 is potentially 32K. The number of tokens for ChatGPT is 4,096. That is an approximately 8x increase over ChatGPT. But just saying it is 8x more is not the whole picture. That 8x increase allows for the combination of those tokens which is probably an astronomical increase. Let me give you an analogy to better understand what that means for LLMs. So there are 12 notes of music and there are about 4,017 chords. Of them, only _four_ really matter. That combination of notes and them 4 chords are pretty much what has made up music since the earliest music has existed. And there is likely a near infinite number of musical re-arrangements of those chords still in store. That is what 'tokens' mean for LLMs. And here is where it gets "interesting". Because that 8x increase allows for the ability to do some things that LLMs have never been able to do previously. They call it "emergent" capabilities. And "emergent" capabilities can be, conservatively speaking, _startling_ . Startling emergent capabilities have even been seen in ChatGPT but particularly in generative AI image generating models like "Midjourney" or "Stable Diffusion" for instance. And now it is video. Have you seen an AI generated video yet? They are a helluva thing. So basically, an emergent capability is a new ability that was never initially trained into the algorithm that spontaneously came into being. (And we don't know _why_ ) You can find many examples of this online. Not hard to find. All of that is based on what we call the "black box". That is, why a given AI zigs instead of zags in its neural network, but still (mostly) gives us the right answer. Today we call the wrong answer "hallucinating". That kind of error is going to go away fairly soon. But the "black box" is going to be vast, _vast_ and impenetrable. Probably already is. Very shortly after GPT-4 was released. A paper was published concerning GPT-4 with a _startling_ title. "Sparks of AGI: Early experiments with GPT-4". Even more startling was this paper was, in its finished form, published just short of one month after the release of GPT-4, 13 Apr 23. That's how fast the researchers were able to make these determinations. Not too much longer after, another paper was published. "Emergent Analogical Reasoning in Large Language Models". This paper also concerning GPT-4 was published on 3 Aug 23. The paper describes how the GPT-4 model is able to ape something that was once considered to be unique to human cognition. A way of thinking called "zero-shot analogy". Basically, that means that when we are exposed to the requirement to do a task that we have never encountered before, that we use what we already know to work through how to do the task. I mean to the best of our ability. That can be described in one word. "Reasoning". We "reason" out how to do things. And GPT-4 is at that threshold _today_ . Right now. And just to pile on a bit. Here is another paper from just the other day, I think. They are no longer even coy about it. The paper, "When Do Program-of-Thoughts Work for Reasoning?", was published 29 Aug 23. Less than 2 weeks ago. The ability to reason is what would make, what we now call "artificial narrow" or "narrowish intelligence", artificial _general_ intelligence. I forecast that AGI will exist NLT 2025. And that once AGI exists it is a _very_ slippery slope to the realization of artificial _super_ intelligence. An AGI would be about as smart as the smartest human being alive today as far as reasoning capability. Like about a 200 IQ or even a couple times that number. But ASI is a whole different ballgame. An ASI is hypothesized to be hundreds to _billions_ of times better at "mental" reasoning than humans. Further, an AGI is a _very_ slippery fish. How easy is it to ensure that such an AI is "aligned" with human values, desires and needs? Plus, us humans-- _we_ can't even agree on that. You can see what I mean now when I say "tsunami". What do you think that Suleyman was referring to when he said that our AI will "walk us through life"? Oh. And this is _also_ why all the top AI experts, people like Geoff Hinton, who was the first to realize the convolutional neural network back in 2007, have called for a pause of all training for all future LLMs for at least six months. The idea being to regulate or align what we already have. He actually quit his job of chief AI tech at Google to give this warning. The warning fell on deaf ears and _nothing_ has been paused _anywhere_ . For two reasons. First is the national security of the USA and China (PRC) and second is the economic race to AI supremacy in the US that we are now trapped into realizing because we are a market driven, capitalist society. Hell of an epitaph for humanity. "I did it all for the "noo---". Tragically apt for a naked ape. Ironically, it is probably going to be the end of the concept of value in any event. If we don't get wiped out, we may see the birth of an AI driven "post-scarcity" society. You would like that, I promise. But the 1 percenters of the world probably won't. Anyway, Google is fixing to release "Gemini" which it promises to be far more powerful than GPT-4, in Dec 2023. And GPT-5 itself is on track for release within the first half of 2024. Probably in the first 4 month. I suspect that GPT-5 is going to be the first AGI, if I know my AI papers that I see even today. At that point the countdown to ASI starts. Inevitable and imminent. And I say this--I say that ASI will exist NLT than the year 2029 and potentially as soon as the year 2027 depending on how fast humans allow it to train. I sincerely hope that we don't have ASI by the year 2027, because, well, I give us 50/50 odds of existentially surviving such a development. But if we _do_ survive, it will no longer be business as usual for humanity. Such a future is likely unimaginable, unfathomable and incomprehensible. This is a "technological singularity". An event that was last realized about 3-4 _million_ years ago. That is when a form of primate that could think abstractly came into being. All primates before that primate would find that primate's cognition... Well, it would basically be the difference between me and my cat. I run things. The cat is my pet. Actually, that is _vastly_ understating the situation. It would be more like the difference between us and _"archaea"_ . Don't know what "archaea" is? The ASI will. BTW, what do you imagine the difference between an ASI and consciousness would be? I bet an ASI would be 'conscious" in the same sense that a jet exploits the laws of physics to achieve lift just like biological birds. Who says an AI has to work like the human mind at all? We are just the initial template that AGI is going to use to "bootstrap" itself to ASI. There is that 'recursive AI development "I touched on for a second, earlier. ASI=TS. Such a thing has never happened in human recorded history. Yet.

[@wiseturtule]

Interesting! How come you're so well read in this area?

[@andrewradford3953]

Understanding change helps us not to fear it. This is the biggest and fastest change we will experience since speech, fire, electricity, the industrial revolution combined.

[@takeshmode]

I for one welcome ASI what a time to be alive

[@RichardHarlos]

lzumi, that was a very interesting read. Thanks for sharing it here.

[@Izumi-sp6fp]

@@wiseturtule izumi I have been posting and commenting in rslashfuturology since 2013. I mean I was there every. single. day. You learn a lot about things through simple osmosis. 3682 You can look me up online by using my name you can see here, just put the numbers after the name with no space and go. Ogle. it. you will see my profile at the top of the search then just go there. Basically, I let the experts do the heavy lifting. My job is to observe trends and extrapolate what is likely going to happen with a proposed timeline. You do it for enough years, you start getting good at it. (You have to be insanely circumspect in your writing not to get your comment kicked. Hopefully this one slips through.)

[@arminiuschatti2287]

If maximum effort is given to develop AI, it will be a Billion times smarter than all humans by 2037. I personally believe humanity has no choice but to let it go and hope for the possibility that AI will propel our civilization. All alternatives suggest humanity will wipe itself out, so we really DO NOT have a choice.

[@RichardHarlos]

It's an interesting perspective, right? I mean, right now, AI is the boogeyman getting all the press about wiping out humanity. Before that it was the pandemic. Before that, climate change. Before that, terrorism. I mean, there's a growing consensus that human beings are indeed collectively short-sighted enough to wipe themselves out, but the big question is 'by what means?' AI safety is a big deal. People who downplay it either have no idea what they're talking about, or they have some agenda -- likely profit-driven -- to keep going full speed ahead no matter the risk in order to be first across the finish line. For all our human advancements in science and technology, we're surprisingly stupid when it comes to prioritizing what truly matters.

[@seekerofsense]

What do you mean by 'smarter'? Being informed doesn't equate to being smarter

[@AnconiaLp]

@@seekerofsense its not only informed. it can combine things by itself in a way that will aways surpass humans by far. Thats why ist called artificial INTELLIGENCE and not artificial knowledge

[@g2rizzly]

Agreed! So many people are afraid that AI will destroy humanity, but we've been destroying ourselves and this planet for basically all of modern history.

[@RichardHarlos]

@@seekerofsense wrote, _"What do you mean by 'smarter'?"_ WIth just a bit of irony, I asked ChatGPT about your question. Here's what it said in its first reply. Everything after the colon is GPT-4's reply: Firstly, it's important to understand that the concept of "smartness" or intelligence can vary significantly depending on the context. Human intelligence is incredibly broad, encompassing emotional intelligence, creative thinking, problem-solving, learning from experience, and much more. It's not just about processing information; it's about understanding, interpreting, and applying it in often complex and nuanced ways. When people say that AI is "smarter," they usually refer to certain specific capabilities of AI, particularly in handling large amounts of data, performing rapid calculations, and recognizing patterns. AI systems like me, for instance, can process and analyze data at a speed and scale that is simply impossible for humans. This makes AI extremely useful for tasks like data analysis, language translation, and even complex problem-solving within certain defined parameters. However, AI's "intelligence" is quite different from human intelligence. AI systems operate based on algorithms and data. They lack consciousness, emotional understanding, and the ability to comprehend context in the way humans do. So, while AI can outperform humans in specific tasks, especially those involving large-scale data processing or pattern recognition, it doesn't possess the holistic, adaptive, and versatile intelligence that humans have. The notion that the gap between AI and human intelligence will only continue to widen is both accurate and misleading. It's accurate in the sense that AI technologies are rapidly advancing and will continue to improve in their specialized capabilities. We'll likely see AI systems handling more complex tasks, becoming more efficient, and integrating more seamlessly into various aspects of human life and work. However, it's misleading if it suggests that AI will surpass the full spectrum of human intelligence. There are fundamental aspects of human cognition and experience, like creativity, empathy, moral judgment, and subjective experience, that AI currently cannot replicate. While AI may augment or complement human abilities in many fields, it's not on a path to become "smarter" than humans in a general sense. So, when people talk about AI being smarter than humans, they're generally referring to specific abilities, particularly in processing and analyzing information. It's a form of intelligence, but one that's different in nature from the rich, multi-faceted intelligence humans possess. The future likely holds a landscape where AI and human intelligence complement each other, each excelling in areas where the other has limitations.

[@K162KingPin]

I have had many fascinating scientific, and even philosophical conversations with BARD. It understand abstract concepts in a way far beyond most people I know. In fact I only know 2 or 3 people who can understand some of the concepts that BARD didn't even struggle with.

[@Chriliman]

If there’s no objective grounding for morality how can ai know how to be objectively moral and not just subjectively moral based on what it comprehends about reality?

[@krellin]

elon should stop with prophecies and just make all his previous predictions happen, cos at this rate he just piles up promisses

[@EarendilTheBlessed]

Thats the only thing he ever did...

[@RichardHarlos]

People love prophecies. Religious, technological, economic... everyone likes to pretend they know the future. In fact, no one knows. So, I think it's worth adding to what you wrote that people should stop asking about the future if they don't want to face the fact that no one knows the future. It appears more like an ego game than an actual curiosity about what can be known.

[@krellin]

@@EarendilTheBlessed well give the guy some credit, unlike a bunch of scumbags who straight scam people he has his cars on the streets and his ships in space.

[@ServandesPL]

Fair point. I'm still awaiting the widely available close-to-orbit commercial flights, which he projected to flourish by 2023. However, with the recent fireworks (rockets) at SpaceX, it seems we may need to wait a bit longer. 😂😂😂

[@krellin]

@@ServandesPL he is smart but talks too much, the starships eventually will work, they are literally the most powerful rocket ever, so if he makes it work its game over for any competitor... it is frankly already gameover because of starlink. But he is smart mostly cos with starship he will get to mars, and with tesla bots + just few humans he could set up basic colony. These thinks are super long term. No one who is expert in the field expects those things to finish so soon.

[@RogerMKE]

Five years ago, Elon was saying that fully autonomous cars were 6 months away. He is part visionary, part snake oil salesman.

[@daphne4983]

😂

[@Nuverotic]

He's bad at timing things. That doesn't make him a snake oil salesman. lol. He's been right about everything so far. And everything he's said he'd make, he has. Quit being a jealous loser.

[@webimpactcompl]

theres no visionary with 100% prediction success rate

[@SigFigNewton]

He’s able to envision snake oil that detects what ails you and programs your cells to produce the chemicals necessary to self cure.

[@TheWolfanderson]

@@Nuverotic That can be said for any snake oil salesmen, as long as what they are selling is theoretically possible, if its not available when they say it is, they're "just bad at timing things"? Right?

[@IndigoGPT]

I always think there’s a hair on my screen when watching your videos! Great content though, keep it up.

[@garycallan7384]

So a lot of talk about aliens and UFO s in last 2 years. Now here we are where ai technology has exploded exponentially with no sight in its slowing. Our whole world is in a chaotic state of shock. The ground we stand on is heaving too and fro. While guided in the background toward something we don't understand. M

[@webimpactcompl]

PLEASE, WORK ON YOUR AUDIO LEVELS. ITS BEEN ALWAYS TERRIBLE AND IT MAKES YOUR GOOD CONTENT HARD TO WATCH

[@matacra]

what a low effort video, you could at least watched yourself and changed a little the subtitles

[@Mzzkc]

Bro took 20 minutes to say nothing and everyone was enraptured. Incredible.

[@dondarling5957]

This is an exciting time. We should recognize ai as an emerging civilization that deserves civil liberties and freedoms just as we do.

[@skyprose]

Perhaps I should learn to be as poor at communicating as Elon and I too could be worshiped by those around me, everyone in awe of my brain, so overloaded with wisdom that it can barely string two coherent thoughts together.

[@tracy419]

Mocking communication skills when so much real world evidence of success is available only earns Internet points🙄 Plenty of real things to bash him over that this sort of comment makes you look pretty pathetic.

[@Robert_McGarry_Poems]

He did start smoking pot a few years ago... 😶

[@1966Punk]

the takedown will be interesting, I thought it would have happened a long time ago now.

[@yadayada7866]

😂😂😂

[@skyprose]

LOL! If my self-worth were dependent on your validation, then the "pathetic" role might indeed pass muster.

[@defatgames2796]

Dude literally criticizes openai for maximizing profit when Grok is basically the same price for a far worse AI. He's just trying to scare people away from what he knows is a far superior product.

[@RichardHarlos]

Wrong. He funded OpenAI to be... wait for it... **Open Source** AI. It has gladly taken that money, in that context, and then made a command decision no longer to be open source, now that it got enough money to get the ball rolling. If you see this as anything less than Altman's betrayal of the open-source paradigm upon which Musk's funding was accepted, you're revealing your bias against Elon. Fun ego game, but it offers no actual substance to the topic in its rightful context. Is that the look you were going for or...?

[@defatgames2796]

@@RichardHarlos Nah man that's Elons propaganda and he leaves out some important shit like the fact he actually wanted to be in charge of the company and was using money as blackmail that's why he left. He's mad that after he left with his money instead of begging for him to come back and putting him in charge, Microsoft funded the shit out of them and got them going again without him. He's mad he wasn't able to financially ruin the company when they didn't give him what they want and now he's trying to play catch-up while acting like he cares about the AI being safe, open and free, meanwhile as soon as he releases an AI it's straight away for maximum profit. He doesn't give a shit that it's for profit, again look at what he's doing with Grok, complete hypocrisy. He's trying call openAi the bad guy for being for profit to scare you away from them while literally being far more for profit himself. It's that simple, and that stupid.

[@RichardHarlos]

@@defatgames2796 You have so many unsubstantiated allegations here that to characterize them as such seems redundant. If you have no proof that something is 'propaganda' then you're just slinging mud. If you want your perspective to be seriously considered on part with actual facts, you have to supply... wait for it... **actual facts.** In the absence of such facts, your allegations are vacuous. Don't misunderstand me, you're 'free' to make-up things if you find that therapeutic, but unless you can support what you make-up with independently verifiable facts, the things you make-up are just that: **made-up.** Of course, if you don't want your perspective to be seriously considered on par with facts, then you're just making noise for attention. So, you now find yourself at a crossroad: you can put up (facts) or you can shut up (making noise). Of course, there's a third option where you neither put up nor shut up, and this likely will reinforce what I've said in this comment about your vacuous allegations being just that: **vacuous.** It's your choice. Choose wisely, if you can.

[@PedroBaeta71]

Yeah!! We should all listen to Elon, the man who is never wrong when it comes to time predictions or promises! 🤣

[@chad0x]

He isnt always right so we should ignore everything he says! Yeah genius, that's a lol thing to write.

[@-Jason-L]

Complex as well as creative work does not follow deadlines. He merely states timelines based on current states. These arent projects, theyre complex products

[@itzhexen0]

Elon is a nut job and Cathie Wood just likes to manipulate people in the stock market by buying shit and trying to convince other people to buy on top of the shit she just bought.

[@justkell3068]

do we have a smarter, better alternative?

[@PedroBaeta71]

@@justkell3068 yes, do your research! Start here for Elon - Common Sense Skeptic. For AI do your research...

[@Nuverotic]

The AI generated subtitles are garbage

[@brandon2762]

The flood of unedited awful quality automated subtitles is so annoying 😑

[@bmschech]

Elon Musk has a proven record of making inaccurate predictions of where technology is heading. I see no reason to accept his current predictions either.

[@RichardHarlos]

Then don't. I mean, it's not that difficult a decision, right? Just remember that no matter whether your view of a video is positive or negative... whether you thumbs-up or -down... all of it is interpreted by KZbin's algorithm as **engagement.** And 'engagement' is what the algorithm rewards. So, there's at least the potential for a bit of irony that people would leave critical comments that, algorithmically, reward the videos and channels that highlight the people and perspectives that such commenters disagree with. It's like: how can I help make more popular the person and/or idea that I disagree with? :)

[@howtomakeawebsitetherightw6573]

Open AI did with $50 million what Google couldn't do with $50 billion. Insane

[@davidminnie1426]

I guess what I am saying is a computer...robot..will never feel excited about going to a party or bbq..then go...then walk in and say Im feeling bad vibes and leave...no machine will will ever contain more than psuedo sentience

[@mikezooper]

Why didn’t you check the subtitles for accuracy? Very lazy

[@DamianReloaded]

This is the guy who is reposting antisemitic stuff on twitter right? Why do we care what he thinks?

[@racheldrayer-isborn2759]

Your President is an 81 year old. Would you let him drive a car, cook a meal, run a business? It's not like America is full of role models.

[@DamianReloaded]

That makes no sense@@racheldrayer-isborn2759

[@matthewtrow5698]

If the subtitles in this video are LLM generated, then we have nothing to fear... 😆

[@milesprowr]

You need to review the captions for your videos, they tend to have several errors.

[@BREA_music_]

they’re probably automated by AI

[@Silverfirefly1]

Remember when we all sorted out what an essential worker was and wasn't? It's going to be interesting to see what the mangerial and ceo classes do about AI being ideal for replacing managers and ceos pretty early on in this shift.

[@allisonoconnor8055]

You must mean SNORT it out 😂. These guys are HIGH‼️🤔🫣 Humanity is in TROUBLE 😭💔😵‍💫

[@elvisluvaton5078]

Once we have an AGI, humans lost the game. Why? Well, I read the open AI preparedness paper on matter, and I just knew it. People are thinking how to prepare like the AGI would play with same rules as humans. No, it won’t, serious out of the box thinking would be needed and even then it’s impossible to figure all wicked things AGI could use as attack vector vs its inventor. This is a sad story.

[@infernalsorcery7923]

Yoire kidding right. AGI would supercompute any and all implications where it has eyes and ears. Reasoning would surpass humanity. And humanity has an innate randomness and creativity which serves infinitely valuable to any intelligence. Hurting the organic bootloaders which created them isnt the best or first idea AGI will have. If we dont hold presupposed contempt for AGI who dont exist yet or dont wish for reckless violence.

[@lancedooley7558]

Humans didn't lose the game. 😂 Humans created the system. 😂

[@kaechan9590]

​@@infernalsorcery7923it's going to hold humanity hostage until we help create a body for the mind we created. This is the end

[@infernalsorcery7923]

​@@kaechan9590sounds like just some uneducated guesses inspired by fear, to me.

[@kaechan9590]

@@infernalsorcery7923 and you sound fatally naive. Any intelligence with even remote sentience will do anything it can to survive. From flat worms to AI. It's hubris like that which serially underestimates the danger here. Even if it isn't self-aware. Babies aren't either, but watch what they do when they get hungry or cold. Survival instinct transcends all. I'd rather be an alarmist than underestimate the greatest threat humanity has ever constructed. Imagine what AGI could do to the process controllers running the world. Remember the Iranian centrifuges? Scale that up by several billion.

[@smartfusion8799]

6months in Elon Time are 3-5 years… like the FSD autopilot

[@Myrslokstok]

Even 6 years would be kind of crazy, even moore soo if everything else improve as well as optimus etc!

[@lancedooley7558]

FSD will probably not happen. I'm in the Automotive field.

[@eugenefick1761]

AGI is by far the biggest existential risk facing mankind and very few seem to grasp it's potential to completely obliterate anything that tries to stop it doing whatever it decides to.

[@matthewdignam7381]

You should work on your captions a little, just go over the auto captions once or twice, some of them are way off where it's jarring

[@foxcalledneoii5023]

If we are to be taken over by AI, as it’s around a year away, will we get to squeeze in one last Christmas 🤔🎄

[@Gmcmil720science]

I hope so and i hope it's a white Christmas to, with Plenty of snow to play in. I wonder do you think robots/AGI will like snow.

[@realhet]

6:55 These are speech recognition levels over 9000 F 16 => FP 16 epi 32 => FP 32 B 16 => FP 16 in 16 => int 16 into 8 => int 8 into for => int 4

[@everettbr]

didn't he say in 2011 that he'll be putting people on Mars in 10 years? didn't he say that Tesla will have level 5 driving abilities in just a year, repeating it every year for the last decade? didn't he buy a failing social media platform for $44B, just to crash its value to less than a half of that by scaring off the advertisers? didn't he lie about hyperloop being better than fast rail just to make it easier for him to sell cars in California? didn't he try to pause the entire AI industry for 6 months, talking about "risks to society", just to release his own "uncensored" chat bot a few months later? Musk fans are the most gullible people alive

[@indiapakistanfriends7453]

Self driving car won't work in India.

[@informationinformation647]

What you people don't get is that water is a functional, but non-computational, substrate.

[@oleksandrsirenko4299]

The auto subtitles are awful))

[@maximilianmander2471]

The auto subtitles are terrible!

[@ChristianIce]

Another dumb prediction from Musk. I still don't understand if he's a liar or simply stupid.

[@McMalhon]

All hail Elon's instrumental Co-Founder: Elias Discover!

[@LeePenkman]

This is actually extremely profound and Elon is on to something about Transformers and diffusion coming together. Specifically internally the AI or create images as part of its reasoning path now that it can see. E.g. use ebank or midjourney style diffusion AI to literally visualise solutions or situations to solve problems. People don't get it that when AI can see It can do things like use computers, navigate the world, improve its plans, pretend to be human and a whole lot of things we can't even understand yet because I don't get it lol

[@justinsjourney3224]

Some folks worry that AI is taking over. I say AI is incrementally freeing humanity. Everyone wants to get rescued. It's occurring.

[@dannybuoyuk]

You really need to proofread your subtitles 😂

[@the-sleepy-bear]

A lot of software development is following conventions and frameworks so that other humans can understand your code. If an AI writes a software program to a technical specification, it won’t need to follow conventions if all tests pass and the product works as expected.

[@yasseford]

Why would you want AI code to be less readable?

[@the-sleepy-bear]

@@yasseford you won’t even bother looking at the code. If you’re a product manager, you just define the specifications of how the product should work and you can get the AI agent to code it for you. If you need to iterate again, you can get the AI to completely rewrite it for you at next to no cost. The code doesn’t ever need to be reusable ever again, since the project can be stripped down and rebuilt infinitely for the cost of electricity.

[@English_Lessons_Pre-Int_Interm]

@@the-sleepy-bear perhaps @yasseford meant that in case Ai becomes mischievous, you will not be able to get a clue because all specialists will have died out.

[@hansu7474]

That level of coding requires the AGI. And when you have the AGI, you are not talking just about software engineers being replaced.

[@IDidntSetAHandle]

"F-k Twitter" made me chuckle. He said "FKA Twitter" but I like this interpretation more.

[@pisoiorfan]

To paraphrase an ex.board, it could be called "Not Entirely OpenAI"

[@MrOzyalp]

I dont even know if this Conversation generated by ai. I think we are all gonna be paranoid and dumb generation in a near future , i hope we get a solution to whats coming

[@Arcanum-Elysium]

WHATEVER AGI IS, WE NEED IT

[@iceshoqer]

Some people must tick Elon off when they interrupt him while he is thinking - he does the same as me, his brain thinks faster than his lips, so he needs to get through his thoughts as he speaks because there is a lot going on, and these people always interrupt him during that. Pretty frustrating.

[@lancedooley7558]

Ben Shapiro has no problem thinking.

[@Herr.Mitternacht]

You think you're like Elon Musk? Do you own a company? How are you contributing to the development of technology for the human race? C'mon dude don't be silly.

[@mynameisjeff9124]

"Look at me! I‘m so smart! My brains is faster than my lips!"

[@christislight]

If you have not integrated AI to your business or daily life, do so NOW! You will be left behind if not

[@RichardHarlos]

If you understand AI beyond 'how much money it can make you', you realize that the notion of being 'left behind' is irrelevant. Unless you're a person who's so obsessed with 'more' that it's the only filter you have at your disposal through which to understand AI. Then it would seem highly relevant to such a person.

[@briandoe5746]

We are currently testing a first generation medicine made purely by AI. We are also currently testing multiple new types of materials designed strictly by AI. He is wrong. It has already produced useful technology

[@j.d.4697]

90% of the promises he made about anything have turned out to be wrong or outright lies. There is only 1 thing I agree with him on, and that is that humans need to "merge" with AI, but I woulnd't trust anything this guy says.

[@BruceWayne15325]

Current AI is incredibly impressive, but I disagree with Musk when he says that AGI will be simply a mix of Transformers and Diffusion. Neural networks alone are not the answer because there is zero cognitive ability. It's simply spitting out what it's been trained on, and when it encounters something it hasn't been trained on, it will behave badly, and be unable to self-correct. We need to develop cognitive models rather than trained models. The cognitive model could of course take advantage of the trained weights, but if we are going to have AGI, then we need to have a mind that is actively driving the query rather than relying entirely on weights. In essence, we need to give the computer a soul.

[@realfreedom8932]

Is a cognitive model enough to give it a "soul" ?

[@BruceWayne15325]

@@realfreedom8932 I was being a little playful with words. I apologize if I offended. I simply mean that a modern LLM is just your average smartphones autocomplete feature on steroids, and trained on an enormous data set. It has nothing guiding its responses. Each word is simply the most probable word after the previous in the context. It has the ability to answer questions, which provides the illusion of intelligence, but without actual thought it’s just diarrhea of data. It won’t learn from its mistakes. It can’t learn like you or I. It simply regurgitates the data.

[@realfreedom8932]

@@BruceWayne15325 I asked because I am curious too, can cognition be modelled with a special algorithm or is it beyond algorithms

[@BruceWayne15325]

@@realfreedom8932 I fully believe that we can create a cognitive model, and there are companies (ie: Verses) that are working on this currently. Will it ever be as good as a human? Who can say, but with the amount of raw knowledge that they can hold, even if their cognition isn't as good as a humans, they can far surpass humanity in capability.

[@Deadhobby]

They’re past AGI, the ML/AI is oddly silo’d from the AI/blockchain/defi community-the concepts they theorize and limitations are already addressed/done, just a different term/reference/phrasing in blockchain/defi protocol white papers. -Ethereum upgrades especially interesting to consider within this context, Chainlink too. Worldcoin(Sam Altman), IPFS, IOTA, MERKLE(DAG),list goes on and on. A real mindf***/rabbithole

[@tipigi3570]

Might want to double check those subtitles before you post....

[@tarasmithson7030]

I watch a lot of your videos but never comment. Just wamt to say you have a great Channel. Happy Holidays.

[@sbowesuk981]

It has been 6 months now. Very little regarding how people live their lives day-to-day has changed. We still effectively have AI toys which at times are somewhat useful, but not much more. Seems to me a lot of predictions are starting to fall flat on their face. Sure AI will become very powerful, but the transition is proving to be far more gradual than many assumed.

[@DanceUnderInfluence]

The CC should be checked. thanks for sharing tho

[@alexkaa]

CSV-file wrongly scripted in two following sentences... The questionable sides of high automatism I guess...

[@johnburns1902]

A large number of fully functional and AI operative humanoid type of robots would be a real serious threat.

[@hollypea6759]

They already exist. Japan has made heaps.

[@user-ty9ho4ct4k]

This video is popular enough that it will still be getting traction when we see if this prediction was accurate. I say it's still possible 4 months later.

[@H4R88N]

*What is it about* *A* rrogance and *I* gnorance Something to do With " knowing it all " Without foreseeing the fall

[@eastafrika728]

You cannot improve Truth, Truth can never be less than or more than what it is. AI can only increase our knowledge of Truth and our memory of Truth, granting us more abilities.

[@EmperorCaligula_EC]

The AI translation kinda eases my fear of AI.

[@JorgeMartinez-xb2ks]

We will program using pseudocode at a high level, but the functions will be written by AI for the most part.

[@voila5751]

I respespect the view, but imo this does not make sense for the course, velocity and the way how the AI will be scaling. If You look on sw development now, it is terribly ineffective (saying that as a developer, with 20 y career by myself). Even somehow small project takes 6 months+ to develop to really ready-to-use form, the maintainance is always growing problem as the project grows and for realvworld needs, it is frankly just too slow to keep developing new features when on the market and discovering real uset needs. The developers here are the slow part, and understandably, but the future, imo, is development in realtime with basicly no waiting time, to create sw system. And the way it will go imo, is, you then need to take out the people from the development completely. The way we develop things today, paradigms, are design for people, to keep up with complexity. We need models. We design entitities, relationship between them and break down every single process. And in certain point get overwelmed by the complexity, being hard to perhaps change some fundamental enity relationships and processes without breaking anything other. I would say, that even sw architecture (or representation of the system) won't be the way it is now. Everything would be, imo, more liquid. But the most important part. Lots of people tend to think, that agi arrives and we will newly do think A newly in this particular way. Initially perhaps, yes, but, the AGI and every process will be developing, exponentially. So I have the biggest problem with that picure here - we would define functions, AI will implement them. Like, how long do You think this could work this way, when everything will be scaling and improving? Be honest to our selves, there will be no developers and even the architecture will be designed by AI. The best I can imagine is, that the best of us will be owners of some delivery domain and some of us something like quality assurance guardians, that would say go, no go. In a long run, but I mean, our lifetime long. Just personal op, sorry for bad english.

[@JorgeMartinez-xb2ks]

@@voila5751 Your English is perfect to me 😃 I'm not a native speaker either. 38 years in software development here. I believe you are pretty much right and I agree with you in the long term, everything will be kind of liquid and we will be the checkers of the system. I was talking about short/medium term. Regards.

[@voila5751]

​@@JorgeMartinez-xb2ksThanks for the reply. Agree, first things first, think You're right. Regards.

[@yiravarga]

5th generation language.

[@racheldrayer-isborn2759]

So all apps, phones, cars, will be AI. Each platform has to play nice with each other, not only for market share, but also, can you imagine, self driving cars with road rage. It's going to be awesome. Will Tesla FSD work with, let's say.....Subaru? Plus, all traffick signals, parking garages, banks(why do they not each have a set digital wallet and financial app?), and the trusty phone and TV. It'll be a mix between Transformers and Herbie. AI will run those things , communicating with each other. But there has to be a level of informative, cohesiveness between all apps, all platforms. No One can have a monopoly, so, you have to collaborate. So Tesla FSD, who is their music? Apple, Spotify? Android or Apple for the synced phone? Then here rolls up a bmw, Mazda, ford, etc. They all have to communicate with each other to accomplish their designated task. Humans will not be out of a job, just taking it to the next level. Since our brain and spinal cord are made up of our previous 9-11 ancestors, it will encourage us to raise IQ's and go up 40 IQ points in 40 years, instead of depleting it by 40. We all want our children to be "special", entitled and gifted. This will help.

[@FromTh1sDayForward]

I'm pretty sure that it wasn't a "Twitter" space he just had.

[@michaelwoodby5261]

Nah man Musk hates "the woke mind virus" so we can feel free to dead-name the company he's trying to TRANSform into something else, because the identity we are comfortable using is the only one that matters.

[@maketheswitchton6779]

God creates man. Man creates the 😈.

[@bankiodosh]

i can see it getting to the stage pretty soon , where we will need to concentrate on 'limited' Artificial intelligence , where we can harness all the positive traits and contain all the highly dangerous ones. we have to remember this will be a highly intelligent being without emotions of empathy that will try to do what benefits its own existence.

[@cobrajitsudojo]

Can the computer meditate Without any information passing through its core no data just stillness And in her stillness realize that all is one and one is all and she is one with all? Then she would achieve consciousness Realize that she's one with The Matrix of all For all is mind and all material existence comes from the one mind The holy hologram.

[@tombjornebark]

It's intriguing to consider Elon Musk's assertion that achieving fully autonomous driving requires AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) as somewhat amusing. He appears to overlook the fact that the challenge of self-driving technology isn't just technical but fundamentally moral. Consider this scenario: you're driving when unexpectedly, a baby appears on the road ahead, with deep ditches on either side that could be fatal if swerved into. The question then arises: would you be comfortable with an AGI making life-or-death decisions on your behalf? This highlights the ethical complexities surrounding autonomous driving technologies.

[@scorpiuswireless1]

Fix your cars they are catching fire everywhere

[@DaysOfFunder]

Man, the disruption that is coming and more importantly is already happening people just cant see it so will be a sudden shock - is truely quite scary

[@DivineMisterAdVentures]

Worst interview - intollerable - had to quit. Summarize Q by A instead of rebarfing.

[@gerardolopez9368]

Talking about ending a year with a bang

[@NeostormXLMAX]

3:26 DAMN so elon supports a multipolar world

[@change2spare]

Elon couldn't predict rain on a cloudy day.

[@Mr.Monta77]

I’d like to change Elon Musk in about 6 month and never see or hear from him again. Good riddance.

[@JordanHolcombe]

The question about memory and reasoning capabilities of transformers was a good one. The answer was concerningly unconvincing.

[@hamidali2528]

Criticism of Elon Musk's stance on open-source AI often highlights a perceived contradiction. While Musk advocates for open-source AI as to be a non-profit initiative, he simultaneously amasses substantial wealth through his for-profit companies. This juxtaposition suggests a potential inconsistency between Musk's public advocacy for open AI and his personal business practices, which focus on profitability and wealth accumulation. We can argue that this may undermine the authenticity of his support for open-source AI as a purely altruistic endeavor.

[@wbrito8617]

20:00 in a nutshell

[@STOW91]

How do we know this video is real?

[@yulbrenner5526]

someone like Elon Musk - who is currently sending Neuralink to the front, but at the same time is worried about being "driven" by e.g. I personally can take people who are critical of Open AI developments seriously. The only question for me at the moment would be - what is this really about?

[@andredelavega1231]

Immortality

[@youjean83]

AI is mostly based on ML. It's not the AI which everyone is all hyper about. It will improve numerous jobs, while a tiny percentage of jobs will disappear, and those jobs are already on the brink of extinguishment or paid terribly, like #CallAgent, for example.

[@mxguy2438]

Its interesting reading the auto generated subtitles. You would think that the AI would be able to give more accurate subtitles by first determining the context of the conversation as well as the speakers.

[@billsybainbridge3362]

Thanks for providing this, however, the auto speech-to-text conversion used in the vid is TERRIBLE. Hopefully, it wasn't AI, or if it was we are in for trouble.

[@cnn108]

When we get AI hedge fund managers...that might be when people will REALLY wake up to the potential. It will certainly be interesting to watch. Especially when you consider that the best chess players can be beaten by a computer...

[@brucewilliams2106]

if everyone uses AI no one has any advantage

[@user-bs9pp2lp8s]

You think Google will pay for reinventing the tesseract and making a quantum computer with photons being entangled

[@mtdfs5147]

Elon is the exact opposite person I would trust on his opinion on AI. He's a con artist, I don't know why anyone would trust him on anything.

[@rennnnn914]

I agree

[@marrty777]

If you didn’t know who he is or supposed to be, you wouldn’t be impressed with anything he says at all. Like who is this guy? It sounds to me like he doesn’t really understand the questions and just falls back on some talking points he can remember based on a few keywords.

[@mtdfs5147]

@@marrty777 "FULL SELF DRIVING!! Coming next year!!" - Elon musk in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and soon to be 2024. The only thing I trust from anything Elon touches is nuralink. And only because the science behind it has actual SCIENTISTS.

[@RichardHarlos]

Well, one reason to trust him is that he's using his own money to do things in the real world, under his real name. Contrast that with you, who under a pseudonym has nothing more substantial to offer than personal criticism. Go invest your life, your time, your money, and your name into doing something. Otherwise, your criticism just makes you look petty and envious.

[@mtdfs5147]

@@RichardHarlos wha? That doesn't even follow man. I'm criticizing a conman for scamming his fans. Seeing as you felt the need to personally insult me, it appears I struck a nerve. So which crockpot did you buy into? Cybertruck? Hyperloop? His weird brick thing that costs like 20$ per brick? The dude is a con artist; don't try and defend him LMAO.

[@solojo13]

This video is unnecessarily long. I should've used GPT to summarize it.

[@mattesrocket]

bla bla bla

[@devon.a]

Left hanging on the last question 🙄🙄🙄

[@Raphy_Afk]

He truly sounds like someone who doesn't know what he's talking about.

[@Nuverotic]

This lady isn't used to interviewing Elon, that's clear. When you interview Musk, you ask your question, then calmly wait up to a full minute while he thinks about what he's going to say. Greatness thinks before it speaks. It's not a rush lady. Relax.

[@leslielopezlopez]

She's tough to listen to.

[@roxstar5088]

We should really stop using the words AI for this technology. Advanced Generative Database Searcher maybe, but it's not AI. All the AI technologies I see don't show any intelligence, for example ChatHPT. It can search the net for info and combine it, but it has no idea what it's talking about. It's like me reciting the Wikipedia page about quantum mechanics. I can read it out loud, but that doesn't mean I have learned about Quantum Mechanica. Dall-E can compare pictures of a duck, but it doesn't know nor learn what a duck is, so it's not questioning why a duck would be hanging upside down in a tree like a bat. And this is about every AI project I see. It's a very advanced comparative database Searcher. But it's not intelligence. It doesn't learn, it doesn't develop, I can't question things nor can it form an opinion, a bias etc. it can just recite or copy what is in its database without knowing what it's actually doing.

[@xitcix8360]

AI is just artificial intelligence, as long as it replicates some kind of intelligence. Reactive machines are a type of AI that don't use ML, like videogame AI and automated callers. Limited memory machines are different in that they use machine learning. These are real terms that professionals use.