Emma Johnson: "Old Feminists" Don't Want Equality In Divorce Court

[@DadSavesAmerica]

If you like what you see and want to stay up to date with Dad Saves America, please subscribe here on KZbin or over on Substack, where you can find weekly articles and the audio version of the podcast, with more to come in the near future! www.dadsavesamerica.com

[@ThatGastrodon]

It's amazing that even as she wrestles with the vindictiveness and evil of feminism, she still wants to preserve some of it. It's always been crooked, from the very beginning.

[@johnnyjohn-johnson7738]

She lost me when she said "reproductive rights". I stopped watching at that very moment. She's got a combination of entitlement and stockholm syndrome going on. What I found hilarious is that she's giving feminism all the credit in reality all they did was take advantage of 20th century men's goodwill and already changing attitudes, also the most influential feminists behind closed doors were male simps in positions of power.

[@dookester.manoftruth7773]

It's a Cult. She was indoctrinated many, many years ago.

[@jonwwillis]

Because she benefited professionally from feminism.

[@ravenmischief8006]

You're watching someone struggle with self preservation and morality.

[@supermario69kraftgami23]

Yup, ever since feminism weaponized women's suffrage to start the prohibition (and later, the racist and misandric war on drugs). Letting women vote is a moral imperative, but 100 years ago, strings were attached to that.

[@Aggie1295]

I've been an attorney for over 25 years practicing family law and criminal defense, and people have no idea how much of a shit show it has become. Every woman who gets on drugs or who is charged with a crime blames it on some man and a bad relationship she was in. Even when the problem is that she is picking bad guys, and I do mean bad guys, she still doesn't take responsibility for choosing the bad guy. On the family law side with divorces and custody cases, every single woman out there claims to be a victim of some type of abuse or the other. The slightest contact is physical abuse. A man yelling at a woman is emotional or mental abuse. I've seen women with their own kids marry a man who is the sole provider of income, and if he controls how the money is spent, money he earned, she claims its financial abuse. We are told by the media to "believe women" without any supporting evidence, yet women lie constantly. This assumption that all men are violent has led to criminal laws that are absurd because politicians are afraid of news stories about one woman here or there being murdered by a male companion. That is a statistical anomaly. My first wife had me arrested for harassment years ago after I sent her flowers. She told the police that I had been physically abusive, but had no evidence because I never touched her. It took almost two years to get that case dismissed. She was also mentally unstable and spent years in and out of mental hospitals. My second wife told me about an ex-boyfriend from undergrad who became abusive and even raped her, but years later she ended our marriage and got back together with him claiming she had told me about a different guy. She married him and he lives in the same house as our daughter, a daughter I haven't seen in four years. The other day in a Facebook group for lawyers, some woman lawyer was complaining about an ex-boyfriend calling her. Other lawyers in the group all screamed for her to get a protective order and file criminal charges for stalking or harassment, yet she didn't mention any threats or even messages, just that he still called. I objected to trying to turn him into a criminal, and I was jumped on by the other lawyers, most of whom have no clue of the damage that could be done to the poor guy. It is also the case that no one asks a woman such as this one how she treated him, and I've seen women treat men like crap on a regular basis. It is also the case that men are still expected to be the breadwinner and primary income earner, in spite of all the women in the workforce that earn good money. If a man doesn't make enough, he is a freeloader, but a woman who doesn't work will still demand half of a man's retirement or other property even though she contributed nothing. I don't hate women, and I don't want to. I entered adulthood viewing women as professional equals. Yet, I am sick and tired of the double standards, and I'm tired of the lies from every woman I seem to encounter. If women want to be treated with respect, then they need to treat others with respect as well.

[@terry9238]

Nope! If one spouse is the sole provider of income, that’s supposed to be joint income-and therefore controlling the finances IS abuse. Anyone who doesn’t want to both be the sole breadwinner AND share control of the finances should marry only someone who also brings in an income-or else shouldn’t marry.

[@col.strayga1389]

The west has been completely destroyed culturally and institutionally by feminism.

[@therollingstone9701]

They'll give you no respect, they'll walk all over you. Abuse stories are everywhere it's become a clown show. I lost my kids for 3 years now, and I could see how the system operates to eliminate you as a parent. People always side with women but I don't anymore, I have met so many female liers that I won't side with the believe all women injunction. Women are elite liers for most, with the accountability of a toddler, and society knows it deep down but still we want to put on pink glasses when we look at women. I understand your pov as a lawyer, I am average Joe from France, and our system is just as biased as the US one. Take care,

[@HomeSchool4You]

@@terry9238 No.

[@Old_PCgamer]

The ladies and their symps have gotten what they asked for, a slow slide into the shit.🍑🤣

[@matthewatwood8641]

All feminism hurts us.

[@gregoryisom7741]

its ok, its just the Hindi Armageddon.

[@StarsDie88]

These older women she's talking about being 'good people' -- I HIGHLY doubt that. Knowing what I know about my own parents, it wouldn't surprise me if these women are vicious to their men behind closed doors. Especially so if they are revealing themselves to have feminist values out in the open.

[@louisbabycos106]

The epitome of "it's cheaper to keep her "

[@Morrisfactor]

Most of the early feminists were Communists: Simon de Beauvoir, Betty Friedan, Katherine McKinnon, Andrea Dworkin, etc.

[@zenden6564]

👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏

[@derikuk2967]

"We're figuring things out." While you are taking your sweet time and dragging you feet figuring "things" out, real lives of real men and real children are being wrecked.

[@ryancampbell2192]

I have a friend who has been kept from seeing his son for years & in many cases his ex changed residence & phone numbers *against court orders* yet kept demanding increased child support yearly. It was only once his son turned 21 that he was able to reconnect...unsurprisingly the mother told the son for decades that his father "abandoned" him & refused to pay child support & refused to see him. They have a lot of work to do to reconnect & build a relationship, but my friend was able to show his son all the court filings & tax forms to refute the mother's claims. It's tragic that these things happen regularly & yet the courts aid/abet horrible actions by mothers by presuming the mothers are the best & only caregivers.

[@markbaldwin7264]

I'm assuming the sun did not hold the mother accountable. And she got a free pass on her parental alienation. That's the problem there's no accountability.

[@ryancampbell2192]

@markbaldwin7264 100% correct...although the son is coming around now that he's an adult & no longer living with his mom.

[@therollingstone9701]

Court judges just care about their career. They give the child to the mom, period. She can do anything, they don't care. Nobody cries over men, and mainstream media is backing up feminism 10 000 percent. It's all rigged.

[@imagoodlistener2730]

Likely texas. Texas $imps the hardest for vvahmens

[@ryancampbell2192]

@imagoodlistener2730 no, Illinois in this case.

[@Jjj21574]

Her eyes are partially open but she is still not seeing the whole picture

[@chaccaron4321]

Bc in order to do so she would need to admit that most of her life has been a complete lie.

[@MrBenji1059]

@@chaccaron4321😮

[@matthewr3986]

Hence why she still says she's a feminist. She will be forever blinded until she can let go of that ideology

[@annarboriter]

It's generally the best that we can expect. She might not like some of the negative consequences of feminist ideology but she is not about to admit to her complicity

[@matthewr3986]

@@Jjj21574 Par for the course with a still card carrying feminist unfortunately.

[@minimatemasterworks]

It is pretty wild hearing women complain about reproductive rights. All the while having more reproductive rights and not by a little bit either.

[@regulahdegulah1369]

Exactly 💯 they have all the reproductive and termination rights also🤷🏾‍♂️guess who can't stop his child from being aborted or taken away in divorce?

[@dreamingmusic3299]

They have ALL the reproductive rights. We have NONE.

[@barbarajackson5959]

Reproductive rights for me translates into I hate or think children are a bother. Scary for society.

[@91722854]

they use things like bodily autonomy as justification even when it overrides other people's including the babies' bodily autonomy because of their selfishness, essentially, they regard themselves as dictators

[@Krunchtastic727]

Female solopsistism. Women want all the resources because babies. Which would be fine if they were actually having them. Other psychological phenomenon Brifualts law, women are wonderful effect, male disposability

[@CalmBeforeTheStorm76]

Feminism destroyed my family three times-- as a child, an adult in my early 30's, and now a third time in my 40's. I'm so personally destroyed by it... I can't do it anymore. It has left my broken, alone, and my 14 year old is seeing a they/them counselor-- I'm so done with relationships.

[@livenotbylies]

@@CalmBeforeTheStorm76 they took my my dad. They took my son. Closing in on 50 and everything is gone. Right there with you, buddy.

[@viperstriker4728]

There is one relationship that never turns on you like that. God can help if you let Him. Reading the Bible is what made me reject feminism and have hope.

[@Techbros53]

Damn! I’m so sorry buddy!

[@livenotbylies]

@@viperstriker4728I became a traditional Catholic. I rejected feminism so hard, I went back to the original patriarchy. Best thing I ever did. Saved my life

[@Basics_of_Pain]

I haven’t seen this entire episode so maybe they hit on it, but what she is talking about is the Duluth Model. The model has been used to determine family court outcomes for 60 years. Women receive primary custody of children and any family home 90% of divorces. 93% of child support and 97% of alimony flows from men to women. In a single afternoon in family court, a man can lose his marriage, be displaced from his home, lose access to his kids, and face losing 70% of his net worth. It’s no wonder men self delete 9x more than women post divorce.

[@HomeSchool4You]

Instead of self deleting, they should be deleting their wives so other women get sent a message.

[@kja9881]

Yes the Duluth Model I'm from Duluth Minnesota really should be called the bullshit model.😮

[@imagoodlistener2730]

Early last year in New Mexico. The cops killed the guy answering the door with a gun. The woman grabs that gun or another and starts shooting at the cops. They talk her down, and don't treat her the same. Low an behold they have the wrong address. Stupid mother fathers.

[@ArthurDent-q9o]

Young men should be taught about the blessings court system has in store for them after marriage

[@TonyChev]

In traditional societies women were understood to need emotional support and direction as they were more easily upset and overboard due to the stress of things like birthing, menopause, or just PMS. We need to help and support mothers by not allowing them to whimsically destroy their families through divorce. The divorce industry is one of the best evils of our times...

[@Carson-w2o2t]

This kind of thinking is exactly what has led Japan and S Korea to demographic suicide, women aren't emotionally dependent on men they manipulate men to think that they are

[@imagoodlistener2730]

Great message. But you cannot save them. Literally. They cannot be saved.

[@jbman413]

Worst evils of our time

[@ArthurDent-q9o]

Nope. Teach young men what to expect from marriage, divorce and so-called family courts.

[@andrewcharlton2709]

I can understand if husband is violent a drunk or gambler and not looking out for his family, but too take away the kids from a men is so destructive

[@billburr5881]

When will men be given equality? 1860s Couverture was removed - a man no longer had a right to his wife's property or earnings. When will men be given equality? When will women be deprived of her right to his property and earnings? Remember his right to sex with his wife was removed in 1980s - so women withdrew from the traditional bargain of provisioning in return for sexual access. So when will men be given equality?

[@dreamingmusic3299]

Not until after the coming collapse. The way things are cannot continue because everything is so completely out of line and upside down.

[@imagoodlistener2730]

Cat/juice has been over leveraged. It's just not worth it anymore. Don't need no... fine, we agree. Men are waking up from the game of usery. It's good, and about time.

[@GearForTheYear]

Her brain completely breaks when the transformers were brought up, as if it was completely irrelevant to the discussion (it wasn’t). It makes her very uncomfortable. That says a lot.

[@livenotbylies]

There are vanishingly few women who can see, think or speak the truth under social pressure. And not as many men as there should be. Of course, this is exactly why feminism exists. Real men with real fathers are indomitable

[@jonwwillis]

She doesn't want to be labeled as a TERF.

[@rbruce89]

"I'm not educated enough on that."🤦‍♂️ I'm going to file this one under the more intellectual low brow interviews for Dad Saves America. His face looks like he's struggling to sit in the tiny chairs at this kiddie table interview.😂

[@louisbabycos106]

Without feminists initial support of left-wing Transgender identity politics we wouldn't have the "strange boxing at the Olympics " . It's gotten bad enough to come full circle with T.E.R.F.s but without the initial support for the more radical left-wing feminist who embarrassed identity politics you wouldn't have the left-wing Transgender identity politics movement as it is today .

[@alanjaw546]

It was fascinating to watch that. Quite the mask off moment.

[@sergiosifuentes6083]

No Fault divorce is a problem, no child support cap is a problem and alimony is a problem, the laws incentivizes divorce. There should be some exceptions but why do I have to pay alimony to my ex-wife for 5-10 years? I mean how about she'd owe 5-10 yrs of sex after divorce, once every month... it's absurd, right?

[@javiervigil2511]

11:35 most of the time if the dad is a 5 and the mom is a 2, the court will still side with the mother. I've watched my friends get obliterated by the court and the ex has drug problems or she cheated, and the father is still only looked at as a paycheck. The courts are encouraged to make men pay because they share the money. How's that fair and just.

[@dreamingmusic3299]

The family courts are receiving payment from the Social Security department through Title IV-D. They receive between 33% - 150% based on the amount of child support and alimony awarded. So they have financial motivation to break up the family and they automatically give the children to the mother so that they have reason to award money.

[@javiervigil2511]

@dreamingmusic3299 Don't the judges get a portion of that as well?

[@dreamingmusic3299]

@@javiervigil2511 - I would expect so.

[@dreamingmusic3299]

@@javiervigil2511 - Yes

[@robws007]

Started listening in earnest but when she evades making a comment about boxers with XY chromosomes competing against women in the Olympics, I tuned out. The irony of her slagging the “feminist industrial complex” yet then giving the most flagrantly careerist-bureaucrat answer to a pertinent question was hugely disappointing.

[@viperstriker4728]

It's because pointing out how man in women's spaces is wrong raises the question of how someone that believes in "equality" still supports women in men's spaces. Many women have built their identity on being in men's spaces so I can't blame her for avoiding that thought. It's terrifying to realize your the bad guy.

[@Kevin_Knox]

Same. I about hit the roof when she said that. Can't listen to anymore of her fumbling.

[@scottspearritt5826]

Oh my God, what a joke I don’t feel comfortable talking about a thing that everyone has no common sense

[@RealSix200]

Umm, women cannot change the terms of the original contract and still expect men to keep our end of it. That is nonsense.

[@dreamingmusic3299]

Nope.

[@austiin8981]

Get rid of the 19th amendment. Quick fix

[@LoneWulf278]

Basically validating everything feminism posits, and therefore keeping it relevant forever. Smart. 😂

[@austiin8981]

@LoneWulf278 I validate getting rid of the amendment. Feminism will have no power after it goes. Very Smart 🤓

[@gabeo9474]

​@@LoneWulf278What's hilarious is that you think you made a good point, but in reality you only demonstrated that you are getting played by fXXXXism.

[@gabeo9474]

​@@LoneWulf278Keep getting played

[@GearForTheYear]

⁠@@LoneWulf278 they’re so afraid of it happening because it is self-evident that it needs to happen and they’re in denial.

[@georgewashington1414]

3:39 she doesn’t “feel comfortable” on answering what is a woman.

[@blckshplwyr1601]

Whoa, that was a lot of blustering right there.

[@SK-hj8ss]

This lady still has a lot of unresolved concepts tumbling around in her mind. Which is fine, I guess. She's still grappling with things. But she needs to figure these concepts out before she comes on an interview show.

[@Morrisfactor]

I think she is still a firm feminist, nibbling around the edges of being uncomfortable about it.

[@4FunCycle]

Let me tell you how my ongoing divorce has gone and the ludicrous miscarriage of justice. 1. Wife says she is divorcing me. No discussions. No counseling. She's done. 2. When gently confronted about the affair I just discovered, she runs away and I'm accused of sexual harassment and being a "grossly negligent" father. 3. My female lawyer says wife's accusations are clearly not harassment, as well as all of our mutual female friends. 4. I live in fear in my own home of her potential actions until I flee the house. 5. Judge appoints Guardian ad Litem and child psychiatrist to investigate parents. Says it's acceptable that mother severely limits my time with children and I don't get to go to Dr. appointments. 6. One year into process, GAL and psychiatrist say dad is a good father. Psychiatrist has concerns on mother. Mother tells court she wants to move to Canada 1 month before final hearing. Judge allows her to move against my objections, Guardian Ad Litem's concerns, and child psychiatrist concerns. Says he will make a final decision in full day hearing next month. 7. First thing in the morning, Magistrate makes decision, doesn't need to hear either side. Kids are coming back to Ohio. Nothing mother presents will change his mind. All parties agree. After finalizing parenting plan (I'm forced to accept less parenting time because I'm male), Wife changes her mind and decides she doesn't agree. We get 1 hour of testimony in a full day. 8. Five months later hearings are finally done. GAL and psychiatrist still say children should be with dad. 9. One year after magistrate's "immediate decision" he chooses to ignore both of his appointed experts and says kids are in Canada. 10. I immediately object. 6 months later, GAL now says, "Even though I've disagreed with every decision the magistrate has made, the mother moved out of revenge and against the best interests of the kids, the kids should stay in Canada because so much time has passed." Which we told the magistrate was the mother's plan all along. Judge says she will make her decision next month. 11. 349 days later, the judge has yet to issue her decision. If I complain, I instantly lose because judges are in fact petulant children when confronted with their wrong doing. I didn't leave things out in her favor. I skipped over events that are in my favor! My lawyers tells me her entire firm (large men's rights law firm) has never seen a case like this. That she hasn't seen a miscarriage of justice like this in years. You can't tell me after this experience that courts aren't biased. That the system isn't rigged.

[@niroshangovinder4042]

😅Biggest joke here is that the law firm never saw injustice to this extent. In South Africa, most dad's have already seen the inside of a jail for trying to be a dad. Case has been dragged for 5 years. And I'm paying maintenance and see my child like hopefully one overnight stay per week. Oh, after not being allowed to see her at all for like 4 months. The system is so entrenched in keeping Pandora's Box open.

[@EverettBurger]

Had to stop at the halfway point. Hitting too close to home. Once we started a family, I stayed home as a SAHD. It made economic sense. After all, she made significantly more money than me. Fast forward and out kids are now teens. I am still a high school educator. She has worked her way up the corporate ladder and makes very good money. She decided the marriage was over a few months ago. One of the stats she brought up was 70% of GenX marriages where the wife makes more money ends in divorce. I have no idea why she hunted down that statistic. I have never had an issue with her making more money than me. I also adored being the primary caregiver to the kids. Now that we are dissolving the marriage, she is adamant that I get no spousal support. After all it's "my fault" I make so much less money than her. I consider myself a feminist. After all, I want my daughter to have the same opportunities as my son. However, I also want my son to have the same opportunities as my daughter. When it comes to divorce, there is no equality.

[@Jjj21574]

You were lied to about men and women being total equals. Sorry to hear about your situation. Good luck with what's next

[@Samuca1300]

"I have never had an issue with her making more money than me." Ok, but clearly she had an issue with exactly that. She and just about every other woman have an issue with their husbands making less money than them, even if they don't admit to it. It's called hypergamy and it's in women's nature. "I consider myself a feminist." Yup, and your current situation stems from that...

[@michaelhuntley353]

Feminism and the evolutionary arc it’s currently upon is an issue which women must correct for themselves. Men can no longer safely participate or claim themselves as feminists or as a supporter unless they regularly demonstrate their fealty and subservience to modern Feminism. They will not accept male input as valid input. There is simply no space for men to participate without some form of condescension, backlash, diminishment or outright hostility. Feminism has basically become a tool, a method of emotional and mental constraint employed primarily as a control over men at large. A technique to be applied or deployed. Western men are learning this truth. What they are learning now is very much akin to the lessons feminists have been learning for decades, to destroy the pedestal upon where we as a culture once placed our relationships and to value and honor themselves first and foremost. This is actually a very good thing. It is time for men to step away from this crazy mental health issue and let the women learn about their choices. Meanwhile, there is freedom in this for men! Give yourself permission to quickly heal up that hole in your heart and go find your true north! Teach your kids about the history of the Feminist and MGTOW movements so they understand the evolutionary and current perspectives of RedPill/MGTOW and Feminism equally enabling them to make more informed choices regarding their own, personal relationship prerequisites. Good luck my brother.

[@terry9238]

Depending on what state you live in, you may be legally entitled to get money-either spousal support, half the community property, or whatever. The law typically says the spouse who makes less money-or especially one who was the primary caregiver for children-is entitled to compensation REGARDLESS OF SEX.

[@viperstriker4728]

The divorce rate is 50% higher when the women makes more money. Women are wired to want men to provide and so they often lose respect when men don't. Same as how men are wired to want respect from women and often lose motivation when they don't get it. Marriage is built of these cycles where humility spirals up and pride spirals down. If you look closely enough, women also seem to expect leadership from men. Though because of feminism making that offensive to say it took me a long time to realize it.

[@toddd6563]

That fact that the slogan is “they are wonderful human beings” turns my stomach. The prejudice is just so entrenched in the mindset

[@unknown22222]

Is she drunk?

[@Belzediel]

Bit rambley, bit slurred, bit flushed, yeah, not smashed but also not safe to drive.

[@minimatemasterworks]

Imagine finding out your whole world view is not only a lie, but also just as evil as what you thought you were fighting.

[@gregoryisom7741]

not all medication can be drank... drunk?

[@Kevin_Knox]

"Drinked"

[@polysaturated]

Very weird vibe, might just be her vocal affectation. Reminded me a bit of VP Harris…

[@michaellang4242]

So, even she doesn’t know what a woman is. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@nicetomeetme5150]

Government has no business mediating for 2 adults that choose not to be with each other. ❤

[@gregoryisom7741]

leave unto caeser what is caesers. which means don't leave to the authorities that which does not belong to it.

[@Morrisfactor]

I agree, and yet THE TENDER YEARS ACT OF 1830 started giving custody of children to the women and it has only gotten worse.

[@Grimmlocked]

there is money to be made!!! why would they butt out?

[@nicetomeetme5150]

@@Grimmlocked exactly! Who gave the government the green light? Feminist and their simp cohorts.

[@BB-cf9gx]

Attempting to define all women against a single standard is as ridiculous as defining all men against a single defined standard.

[@jgcelliott1]

I give you… the Duluth model. Enjoy. .

[@chrisbrass8930]

I've looked, it appears that you've never interviewed Cassey Jaye, the producer of the Red Pill documentary. I suggest you watch her documentary and interview her

[@dennisflynn4097]

The point they really need to drive home is the Dad can't just move on because he is chained to the family debt and the Mom gets to move on and demand the old Dad still support the family. The tables have turned in a perverted way that modern white men are the new target to be discriminated against and the society thinks it is OK. Two wrongs do not make it right.

[@TimBitts649]

*Feminism reminds me of NATO...of all things.* I'm a Cold War Baby. I grew up fearing the Soviet Union...the USSR. Terrified of nuclear war, we were taught to hide under the desk, in case of attack. The world as it was back then, made that fear realistic: The USSR was a legitimate threat, communism was a legitimate threat. We were not too sure, that we would win, that capitalism would win. Then. Things changed. Then: Richard Nixon went to debate Soviet Premier Nikita Khruschev, in "The Kitchen Debate"....a debate on the merits of communism vs. capitalism.... Old videos are online. Then, Nixon had a brilliant geopolitical insight: Mainland China was poor back then, China was our enemy because it was communist, was an ally of the Soviet Union, also communist. China had very low levels of technology back then, but they had a lot of capable people. China back then was still a communist threat to us, as well as ally of the USSR, their fellow communists. President Nixon wanted China on our side, to fight against the Soviet Union. Nixon was very widely read in history. He realized: The British, when they had a global empire, owned Hong Kong, ruled it, brought in capitalism...it worked great in Hong Kong. In Nixon's younger days: The Hong Kong capitalist Chinese were rich. However: The same Chinese people in China under communism, their Chinese communist cousins, were very poor. Why? It was the system: communism. It's terrible, doesn't work. Much like East Germans under communism were poor, West Germans under capitalism were rich. Communism was failing, capitalism was succeeding. Nixon knew this, wanted to use this advantage of capitalism working better, to beat communism, beat the USSR. Nixon saw that British rule of Hong Kong turned that tiny Chinese city attached to China into a very very successful capitalist city....very wealthy. Hong Kong is still wealthy. Capitalism works. The Chinese culture is very suited to capitalism, even if mainland China was communist for a long time, mainland China was a primitive mostly rural society, like in the novel The Good Earth, by Pearl S Buck. Nixon knew all this. Smart man. So he used this, to defeat the USSR: Nixon convinced the Chinese to set up 'Special Economic Zones' in China, like Shanghai City to make China rich, so they would become capitalist, become our ally. It sort of worked. Sort of: The Chinese got rich. That part worked. However: They now are trying to overtake America in wealth and technology, run the world, beat us, dominate America. One of our failures: We failed to make them democratic like us, in that we wanted them to be democratic. That was part of the plan. China wanted none of that, they still don't. They are not suited to what we in America think of as "democracy"...so that part failed. But capitalism succeeded wildly. To facilitate the world, the way it was when I was young, we set up NATO. It's a military alliance that time has passed by. But it used to make sense, long ago. It was set up on the idea that Europe was weak, poor, threatened by the USSR and communism. So America paid the bills, for a military alliance to keep the threat of the Soviet Union and communism at bay. We were far richer than the rest of the world, Europe was poor, it made sense back then. The trouble is, in 1989 The Berlin Wall fell....and Europe got rich, by capitalism. The Western Europeans are richer than America, but we still pay her military bills. Crazy. Ronald Reagan did a series of things after Nixon, so that America won, NATO won: The Soviet Union collapsed. In reality: There was no need for NATO in the old sense, because communism was no longer a threat. And in China, communists still run the country, but the economic system is a form of capitalism. Communism turned out to be a failed ideology.....however we foolishly kept NATO....we pay other rich countries' bills, while pretending the Soviet Union is still a threat. It's not. It disappeared when Vivek Ramaswamy was an infant, barely out of the crib. Trump was the first President to see through our foolishness. He realized our financial and military elite still looked at the world thru Cold War eyes. Why? War is a racket. There was a lot of money still to be made, making military equipment, trying to run the world.....like spending $7 Trillion in Iraq, while Americans suffer. The problem in the big picture is: the world change, other countries are catching up with us, technology changed, we can no longer run the world as we used to. And our leadership is like me: an old man...or women...stuck in the Cold War past they grew up with....except Trump. Most people don't escape the perceptions of their youth. Joe Biden is in his 80s, as is Hillary Clinton, most of our elite. Joe was half a century old, when the Soviet Union fell. Joe is too old to change. Most people are, at that age. The trouble is, the world changed, they can't. I once met an old 70 year old man. Bit of a freak. He was never an athlete. Bill was never a runner, never in his life...he didn't run. Then Bill retired, decided he wanted to run a marathon....first one at age 70. He actually did it: Within 2 months Bill easily ran a marathon. So we are at war with Russia....what's left of the Soviet Union, because of our Gerontocracy. Fortunately we have a very rare incoming President, who is one of those old people, who can actually change, embrace the new, to some degree. Trump will fix this mess.....of being trapped in the past, in a bygone era. *Marriage follows the same pattern as NATO, as does feminism.* It actually made total sense, long ago. Lifetime marriage evolved in a world where everyone was religious, Christian, women were expected to marry young, there was no birth control, no dating apps, women did not get much of an education, had more kids, needed to economically depend on a man. It was under those conditions, that feminism evolved. Made sense back then. The trouble? Like the Soviet Union, that old world is gone. No one noticed....except a few. That world of my youth is long gone....but old feminist marriage laws, so sensible for a Christian lower technology society, those old feminist marriage laws are still around....destroying men and families by the tens of millions. Why? They were designed to protect women, when women really needed protection from bad men. That world is gone. Now? Men need protection from women. Now? Women outperform men at school. Now? We rigged the school system right through university, in women's favor....against men. Now? Women vote. For going on a full century, female voting patterns have consistently been using their vote for political parties that do things for women, give them things, rig things like marriage law, to be in favor of women, to be against men. And women are 55% of people who vote. So this inability to leave the past, embrace what we now have, it has turned us into a DEI/feminist nation, rigged against young men, rigged in favor of young women. Just like we today still embrace NATO...as it was, 50 years ago. The problem with not accepting changed reality? Our birth rate is collapsing, women have mostly zero interest in the protection of men, of protecting male interest in marriage. Why not? Females evolved dependent on men, but now they are not so dependent. But their old female biological pattern is: they have a very strong "in-group bias" for women. This means: most of the time for most situations, women will favor other women over men...almost never favor men, almost never be concerned about the needs of vulnerable men. It's a biological bias, designed to protect life, protect the vulnerable. The problem is: women can't conceive of men being vulnerable, needing protection. A practical example: My whole life, 99.9% of the homeless are men. This has never been solved, women...and men...don't seem to care. If almost all homeless were women, I'm sure we could solve this problem, very very quickly. What's going on? Females have in-group bias. If it was a bunch of homeless women, we would care deeply. But the trick is, this "in group bias", isn't specifically only females. Men it turns out, have a pro-women bias almost as strong as the women...while same time, men also don't care much, most of them, if some men have a hard time, if many men are homeless. We both don't care....most of us, both genders. That gets in the way of solving the problem. This bias is all reflected in the marriage and feminism game. Marriage law today is based on a set of old social conditions that no longer exist. But we still evolved to protect women & children...a good instinct for the preservation of life...while we still have our old evolved baggage of not caring much about men. And it's playing out, in marriage laws, that are very anti-male. That's why women don't want equality in divorce court. That's why it's so hard for feminists to have even an ounce of pity, for men. Have some pity for females: Women aren't built, to protect men. They really aren't. That's why all armies in the past were male: men were designed to protect women, but women were not designed to protect men. Blame evolution, not women. So despite the endless stream of bad ideas within feminism, our evolved pro-female bias gets in the way of understanding what is going on, how to make it better for all. The big picture: Due to changing technology, lifetime marriage has failed. Like communism and the Soviet Union have failed: right before our eyes, within a lifetime. We tried it out, but it turned out there were deep flaws in communism.....like there are deep flaws in feminism, that we have to overcome, to get to a better world for both sexes. We still act as though lifetime marriage is sensible. And Bernie Sanders still thinks some version of communism will work. It won't. Crazy Bernie. We're stuck in the past, clinging to our past. We're bitter clingers, even liberals cling to bad ideas.

[@brianshea4177]

Tim You need to turn this into a Substack essay.

[@TimBitts649]

@@brianshea4177 Posted on substack, Bettina Arndt, "Winning Against the Feminist Machine"

[@Morrisfactor]

Regarding marriage in these modern times: for men, the only way to win is to not play the game....

[@danniheggie9956]

the conequence of single mother homes There have been repeated studies that show in a fatherless home (mother only),: -63% of all teen suicides come from a fatherless home. -90% of all runaways come from a fatherless home. -85% of all children with a behavioral disorder come from a fatherless home. 71% of all school dropouts come from a fatherless home. 70% of all children in juvenal hall come from a fatherless home. 75% of all kids in substance abuse centers come from a fatherless home. 75% of all rapists come from a fatherless home.

[@angulion]

Statistics say that what would be best for the child is that in majority of divorces the father would get the child, not the mother.

[@weltraumaffe4155]

I don't believe that the majority of women assume that they will stay married even before they get married.

[@Morrisfactor]

Women want to get married but don't want to stay married.

[@Winterascent]

Not with ideas like starter husbands being known today, and people like me in their 40s knowing plenty of women who were proud to have made lucrative divorces.

[@brandonduke118]

Kramer vs. Kramer. You can't even find that movie anymore. First movie that showed the unequal standards of divorce.

[@markoconnor995]

Yes. Feminism and Afirmatiive Action served a purpose ay one time, but they've outlived their usefulness and have become an excuse for reverse discrimination. DEI has replaced Afirmatiive Action and continues a new legacy of reverse discrimination.

[@viperstriker4728]

Doesn't get me wrong, they have accomplished good. But the purpose for which they were implemented has always been the destruction of the family. They have just run out of good things to disguise the purpose with.

[@fredhubbard7210]

In her defence, at least she understands part of the problem. I went through an extreme separation and divorce. Initially, thought "all women" were like this. I discovered lots of women aren't nearly as toxic as my ex.. The problem is that one toxic father is universalized to "all men" and one toxic woman is excused as an "exception." Anyone seeking exclusive custody needs to be rigorously examined because most often, the one trying to keep the other parent away IS in fact the problem! As a society people think that it is okay to sacrifice a "rare" good man, to protect the (equally) "rare" toxic woman. It doesn't work like that. An injustice to one, is an injustice to society. Our society is falling apart in part because young men recognize these injustices and are opting out.

[@Brooklyn-bred]

She needs to forfeit her feminist membership card, that's how we move forward

[@VolundMush]

I've been having a lot of thoughts recently about the nature of society... my thoughts have moved towards things like, maybe people being allowed to do anything they want by following their own heart and intuition isn't a great thing. Whether that's getting married or getting divorced for instance... we have been taught by culture that marriage is based on love and love is something you feel, a powerful passion, but the reality is that such passions are fleeting and tend to cool down over time - a marriage is also a friendship, a partnership, and a family bond which exists to provide a support structure for raising children. One should not be allowed to enter into that without a full appreciation for everything it means. And, maybe, this is a lesson that the blazing passion of love and affection is blinding and foolish and chaotic and senseless much of the time - sometimes it pans out, sure, but it's not solidly reliable. Society creates false expectations for what life - married or otherwise - is like, and when life doesn't meet these expectations we tend to think that the problem is something with society or the relationship because how could it be that our expectations are what's wrong? So you divorce and try again? What if, after a child is brought into the picture, you're simply not allowed to divorce until the child is old enough to fly the coop? Maybe the root cause of this is that marriages are being entered into under bad expectations and poor planning (though the economic situations of reality aren't helping matters), and divorce is allowed for basically any reason at all... divorce has traditionally been a thing that at least on paper is supposed to be a grave matter for only the most extreme reasons like breaking the marriage vows or being unable to procreate (which can be thought of as breach of contract in more ancient times when arranged marriages were a part of family planning and business arrangements). Now you can get divorced for any reason or no given reason at all, and the shame of it is gone. Perhaps this is not wholly a good thing - or rather, it has exposed some aspects of the human psyche that are uncomfortable to engage with.... Like, maybe those who are older really do have, on average, more wisdom than those younger, and it's an unfortunate fact of life indeed that individuality and dream-chasing emerges before common sense, wisdom, forethought and good judge of character do.

[@darylallen2485]

You're setting yourself up for the argument, "what if the woman is being abused?". Lawyers coach women to say their partner hit them, regardless of that being true or not. The spirit of your argument makes sense, but modern marriage doesn't give a rats ass about that.

[@VolundMush]

@@darylallen2485 Philosophically I would consider domestic abuse to be something that should invite intervention by the community to untangle whatever mess is going on, which in modern times would mean a judge, but false claims are also just as serious as it actually happening in my book... The reality is that proof of such things one way or the other can be hard to come by and operating merely on testimony or a bruise can be faked so it's always very ugly when accusations start flying. Truth can be such a hard thing to extract from reality.

[@Kevin_Knox]

Your entire comment is way too long, however, i share your thoughts in the first paragraph. Ultimate freedom may not be as cohesive with society as we've been lead to believe. In fact, I would say the 2 are in direct opposition to one another.

[@darylallen2485]

This right here is why I see no possibility of marriage for myself. I don't see a life long marriage as a probable outcome.

[@alexlauber8432]

As one of the fathers that was excluded from seeing his kids, and forced to pay alimony and child support to the point of being broke, the divorce court are a slaughter house for fathers. It’s awful for dads.

[@bradharris1062]

6:02 its action then overreaction. It's very telling how afraid she is to give her opinions. A few men on top perpetuated the fear of men be ause the fewer the competition better for the bosses. Divirce is a huge business. We keep making men more snd more to fear

[@ExaValkur]

A compassionate coward is still a coward.

[@EMO_alpha]

4:30 I watched Mrs. Doubtfire and was appauled by the dynamics. It was longhouse tragedy disguised as a comedy.

[@EugeneMurray-z1b]

A horrible 'film'

[@EGH181]

That’s exactly what I thought, same with titanic

[@balancee4802]

Please have these authors on your show : Occult Feminism by Rachel Wilson & The End of Women by Carrie Gress. Thank you.

[@Batosai11489]

I thought the science showed that the best interest of the child is for the parents to not divorce.

[@gjmottet]

I disagree that 50-50 is best for the kids as a child of divorce. Having one household and not being shuffled back and forth as the third wheel in both parents lives is much better because it means having consistency. I had both experiences and hands down the little bit of stability I had in high school when living with just my dad was the only part of my childhood I have some good memories of. Loosing a parent is just the cost of divorce if the parents can't be civil. Mine re-litigated custody every 3-9 months for a decade with the last hearing 10 days before my 18th birthday, by that point I wanted nothing to do with my bio-mother who I saw drag my dad through the mud. My bio-mother was quite nasty to me too and used me as an emotional diaper blaming me for the divorce so there was more to me cutting her out of my life than starting out in a 50-50 situation and not liking it. Still the 50-50 structure created conflict and made a bad situation worse. If there clearly is a better parent, the kids should be in that parent's sole custody otherwise the parents should nest (they chose to divorce, they have to move in and out of the house and not make the kids move back and forth.) Totally agree that men are not treated fairly by family court. My dad was messed up big time from the crap my bio-mother put him through. He still won in the end, but my bio-mother had to be really psycho in front of the judge before I was allowed to stay with one parent. I hate family court with a passion and will never sign a marriage licence for that reason although I believe in marriage.

[@Justin-wj4yc]

I loved shuffling back and forth.

[@Tea_1745]

I was a single father till the state of alaska desided to reinstate the relinquished parental rights at birth in another state 10 years after birth. After our family shelled out almost a half a million bucks and couldn't get our $ back from that state adoption agency and very wealthy adoption parents when the mother could of just offered for our family to take our child at birth but wanted to use the birth of the child to get a medical discharge from the army. LoL yeah yet again another state agency is tearing our family apart and i havent held my child in 20 months and the longest before that a few weeks tops! I've also missed 2 birthdays now and they wouldnt allow for visits of her dying grandfather which she very much loved and always brightened my dads day when she was around. He had 2 strokes in the past 4 years in 2023. Ocs of alaska was so heartless they wouldnt allow a dying grandther and granddaughter visits on his final 5 month's! Ive even got proof of said alaskan ocs agency lying on their statements. Oh yeah they turned on the lies/heat when I'd try to reinstate our rights all over for a 9 year old to be alone after school while i was at work. She even knows how yo use a knife so she's pretty mature but very high energetic though. She's my little fireball! I 😢 😢 😢 here typing this. Yeah also an ex of mine(ive only been in this town for a few years now) i meet heet recently went off her rails and wrote a nasty false letter to her friend in ocs alaska and so the fun began they got wind she was home alone while i was at work 5 days straight visiting my house and in the 5th day she finally spoke to them and ocs alaska kidnapped her. I even lost my job because i had to take "unapproved leave" to deal with the hearing in a few weeks after she was kidnapped by ocs alaska. Oh look up all the manipulate against the grand jury denials recent years! The system sure is broken here in alaska too!

[@parrotshootist3004]

A multi billion dollar international industry.

[@ChristopherSteyn]

I was a Father's Rights Activist. Failed. Obviously. Pain. Everyday. No chance.

[@Kootenay613]

Father's rights are the main reason I've been a men's rights activist for the last 20 years.

[@Morrisfactor]

Me too, for thirty years. To no avail. Child custody outcomes seem just a bad as ever....Fathers as disposable and disrespected as ever....

[@mussersbowsboatsandscience6610]

still together for 20 years cool, divorce happen to me after 27 years.

[@EGH181]

Sounds like we need Handmaid’s Tale to straighten out this horrible situation.

[@gsmollin2]

Emma Johnson claims she is not educated on what is a woman, so she won't comment.

[@rathelmmc3194]

The best for the children is to not get divorced, or at least very rarely.

[@StevenMRA]

The "the older feminists were seeking equality" trope is absurd. Maybe in the 1920's or 1950's. I grew up next to Wellesley College. Had friends who went there and dated a gal from there in the 90's. Even back then the MAN HATRED and double standards were appalling. A man goes to a room with a drunk girl that's called sexual abuse - but I saw, over and over, women who were plastered who had older more experienced lesbian women who took girls to their room who barely knew what planet they were on. But God help you if you said anything - that was "you hate women and lesbians" I SAW women slap and physically intimidate BF's - and the other women egging her on and laughing - and the **moment** he put his hands on her arms to stop her the crowd of women would start yelling "don't you abuse her!" and the abuser would fake tears and play the victim and all the gals went along with it. Any news story where a woman did something, the first question was "what MADE her do it" - whereas with a man he's simply the bad guy. No - the feminists from even the 90's brand of it were full of double standards, completely lack empathy for men as people and will take a woman's side even when it's clearly the woman who was the abuser.

[@zenden6564]

This woman comes across as phoney. "we're still working things out".... Like a Mr.MaGoo driving down the road with a hundred car wrecks behind him"

[@jbman413]

It's been well over 30 years already

[@Bibbo8844hdbks]

6 years, and I've seen my son 3 times. It's a hell I wouldn't wish I my worst enemy.

[@arhabersham]

3:25 My goodness, so much stuttering around this topic! it seems like she is afraid of being canceled for saying that "a man who feels like a woman *is not* a woman, nor is entitled to women-only spaces such as the female locker rooms, bathrooms or (as the example provided) sports competitions". The world we live in is such that people are afraid of stating such facts for fear of losing their jobs. What a heck is going on!? I guess the religious people quoting Isaiah 5:20 were actually on to something.

[@lulzjeffy1337]

3:50 I love how it’s always “experts” like this woman who refuse to state the obvious by saying “I don’t know enough about it.” This is what denying your own common sense and faculties of reason looks like.

[@Demonblade777]

The feminism that is good is the one I built my career on ...the bad feminism is the one that rejects me . Can't even make this stuff up.

[@TheRaiderman1]

Sadly these movements are successful often lose their way and quickly become toxic.

[@Lutz101]

Um... err... but isn't equality antithetical to equity?

[@CrunchyNorbert]

As always the children suffer most

[@MrEvint1973]

And with 1 question she loses all credibility ."I'm a feminist but I refuse to comment on men beating women physically in boxing" yeah don't bother after that she's a grifter PERIOD

[@reasonablespeculation3893]

It's great that women gained their place in educational and professional advancement. Except, while those non-traditional opportunities grew, the lifestyle of Wife, Mother, and Keeper of Traditions diminished. Now women spend their fertile years in school, traveling, hooking up/partying, and advancing their careers. Result; fewer children, families(both immediate and extended) scattered, fewer couples (married or otherwise), and lots of independent women. Many become accomplished professionals and leaders in their field. Regardless of all else, if women are happy, things are going in the right direction. ...and they ARE Happy? ....aren't they?

[@williammorris3815]

It is best not to get into relationships or to have offspring. It is just too risky. Be your best you alone as a lifestyle choice.

[@stephennorako1807]

I tried to watch this but couldn’t get past her manufactured upwards inflections and vocal fry. GKYB 😂😂

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

Haven't quite reached the point of balance in male/female relationships. According to the USA Bureau of Justice Statistics, in intimate partner violence, the female is the victim about 6 times more often than the male. In homicide stats, intimate partner homicide is slightly more skewed with female victims about 7 times more often than males. Forbes comments on female CEO's in an article which says: "Only 9% of CEOs in the largest U.S. companies are women, a startlingly small figure. But what’s even more concerning is the leadership pipeline. A new analysis reveals that few women hold the...roles that typically lead to the top spot, suggesting...the number of female CEOs may remain frustratingly low for the foreseeable future."

[@mtauren1]

You can't blame all men for those statistics. It's like saying that a certain religious group were all terrorists. Most people in prison are men, so there is still a long way for men to equality.

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

@@mtauren1 Did I say all men were wife beaters? I merely pointed out that in crime women are over-represented as victims, and in business they are under-represented in the top offices. So the battle for equality hasn't quite been won yet.

[@bradharris1062]

The sad part is she mentions addiction. And the oxycotton crisis is what caused the now. Fetinal crisis, which is what literally is tearing. Families apart in everywhere and the sad truth is that we know how to deal with its addictions perfectly, so they would not negatively affect families at all. But we just don't want to do it that way because some people just don't like it. They require individual techniques, but still we know how to fix all these problems. And we just don't do it as the cost and detriment of our kids and their future and at the cost of women and SM. Who both ended up isolated lonely and not feeling complete along with the kids

[@StarGrimm-vo3os]

My state assumed shared custody which came down to me negotiating for every other weekend and thirty percent of my income for child support to her home, until she took the kids out of state against the ruling. No consciences but that’s all ok because it’s women’s rights not dads or kids.

[@LastRebel1978]

I would say it’s a generational curse more than a legacy

[@JeffreyBKanz]

The choppiness, hesitation, incomplete sentences, in her voice - she isn't sure of what she's saying vs feeling.

[@katiez688]

Texas is a Community Property state. All the CP has to be split 50/50. And almost every state (maybe all) require judges by statute to not presume one parent will be “better” based on their sex. You can look the statute for your state up on the internet and read it yourself. Almost every man I know who is divorced has 50/50 physical custody because they requested it. The kids usually switch weeks, 1 with mom and 1 with dad. When the dad doesn’t have 50/50 physical custody its usually because the dad did not want physical custody. Some parents do not want to do the day to day work of caring for small children and they use divorce as their excuse to get out of it. Most of the few dads I know who do not have 50/50 physical custody chose to move too far away after the divorce. Its sad but some parents think divorce gives them an excuse to move away and become a parent who only sees the kids 1 weekend a month and a couple weeks in the summer.

[@momsforequalparenting]

Hi Katie - thanks for your comment. Where in Texas do you live? Custody norms vary by region when the law is not a default 50/50 rebuttable presumption (as it is not in TX).

[@jackdeniston6150]

You are deeply ignorant and wrong. Stay in your bubble.

[@Morrisfactor]

Katie - I don't know about Texas but I've witness well over 50 divorces in Washington state and NONE of the fathers got 50/50 shared parenting - it typically is every other weekend plus a four hour visit on Wednesdays for dads - shocking. Of course, the mothers often messed around with the visitation schedule too - just to torment the fathers. Nationally, women get custody of the kids 84% of the time, father 8% of the time, and the balance goes to relatives or foster homes.

[@viperstriker4728]

I have a friend that is in the military. His wife got placement so if he doesn't get a station by wherever she choice to live then he loses his daughter. He is fighting for custody right now. He also wanted to fix the marriage, she wanted divorce. We all have our anecdotes about the problems on both sides. The only solution is to stop getting divorced.

[@j.m.f.g.450]

Don't buy it ,for me there is no middle ground surrounding this matter. Either you're with the devil , or against him.

[@walterkoch2815]

I hope she represents a true course correction in feminist philosophy; she needs to be heard far and wide.

[@viperstriker4728]

Men need to have the right to their own private spaces and I haven't seen anyone yet say how feminism has gotten that wrong it's entire history. There has been no correction, just a slowing of the train wreck.

[@toolma66]

No, she’s veered right into the identity politics lane, where so called feminists don’t even know what a woman is …

[@JP-xq7fo]

Her book is about 50-50 divorce and parenting yet hasn't done any research on some of the cases that have reached the upper level courts concerning divorced parents and gender identity/surgeries authoritatively carried out by one half of that 50-50?

[@ChristopherSteyn]

Great, well, good news the corrupt and authoritarian bots at KZbin allowed me to post, "Ok, I", now let's see if I can post... "Ok, I was a"

[@ChenoaMacSweeney]

While I'm aware there is no perfect solution for children of divorce, my daughter's were victimized by the 50/50 assumption, w/1 father being a sociopath & the other being a narcissist - unknown to me before each dissolution. I grew up w/far too much faith in the legal system, which has worked for my mother (divorced several times, although I am an only child). I kept trying to find a decent man, due to my failing fertility, so I didn't have as much time as most get, to make better choices. I am a college-educated critical thinker, but if I could do over (w/the same kids, of course), I would have settled in 1 of the "best-interests of each child" states, even if it meant no TANF or child support for either!

[@MoonBurn13]

Very educational. About her and this channel.

[@BredyTruver]

The same feminist bs, just less radical.

[@ChristopherSteyn]

Whoo-hoo it worked. Kaiser KZbin allowed it. Now to add the word, "activist", in front of Father. This will break my old world record, so again, chaps, luck's a needed. Can you feel the tension? Focus, we can do it together. Come on!

[@DadSavesAmerica]

Chris set your comments filter to newest instead of top. You’ll see you prior comment. Dumb platform default.

[@ChristopherSteyn]

Yay, everybody, look, the autoctrats at KZbin have allowed my post, "Ok, I was a", and it has been published. How lucky am I? Gee whiz. Anyway, let's see if Kaiser KZbin will allow the phrase "Ok, I was a Fathers", as a line. Now remember that the word "Father" is a no, no. Wish me luck, chaps.

[@bradleygrunner]

What a BS artist.

[@ChristopherSteyn]

Wow, KZbin allowed my last comment "ok" to be published. That is so cool. I love KZbin and its autocratic censorship. Now, let's see if I can type an "I", next to it with a comma before. Let's see if KZbin will allow me to do do, shall we?

[@kimschreiber-cg3ch]

I love you work 👍

[@tenthousanddays2103]

All these roads lead to the Frankfurt School.

[@justinm4497]

.......... you NEED to get Dr. Carrie Gress

[@ThePinkPill_OG]

This came up randomly on my for you page, and imagine my delight to see my friend EMMA JOHNSON doing what she does best...being amazing! Great job, sis.

[@GrimSower]

Eugenics works in mysterious ways 😂

[@ROBOTRIX_eu]

[@snizzypoosexcellentspooner2468]

Of course, she's divorced. Lol. Why would I want to listen to her?

[@SlickDissident]

Great drive for reconciliation here. 🙏🏽 Gotta point out the subliminal assault in the narative of "Toxic Masculinity" too... Toxic Mask utility took on a dark projection for two years, or so. Takes a [sic] sense of humor to functionally dismantle the psi (Pounds per square Inch) ops. Hold the light, gents.

[@SlickDissident]

Multiply the prophetic 2020 hindsight value of the "Toxic Mask futility" egregore by the upcoming tit for tat phrase "Toxic Femininity" yields some intrepid insinuation at Famine. Willfull and pun rich neologisms are every Father's unwelcome super power. I say we get ahead of the phrase "Toxic Femininity" with something more like Lackluster Womanlessness, or Laughable Babymakers.

[@viperstriker4728]

I don't get what psi means. Could you explain?

[@SlickDissident]

@viperstriker4728 it is a polyvalent metaphor. p.s.i.=pounds per square inch Also signifying pressurized sublimated innuendo, PSY🔱cologic subliminal implication, and in India is signafies Pingala, Shushumna, and the Ida. I liken it to the ghoastbuster containment unit where active denial of inconvenient truths, often erotic or excessively anxious, store up over time until context can reconcile implicit shadow. Hope that helps.

[@robm1374]

Divorce is wrong. Be adults, let’s work out the issues

[@Morrisfactor]

Tell that to women, who initiate 75-80% of all divorces.

[@viperstriker4728]

You are the only one here that has actually solved the problem.

[@ChristopherSteyn]

I was a Fathers

[@roc7880]

she makes no sense, not even a coherent sentence.

[@RFG0neWON1969]

You know the drilly 💯

[@r2dad282]

Society and parents need to do a better job educating our sons about the drawbacks to divorce. I think Gen Z has already internalized this message but drawn the wrong conclusions (eg Andrew Tate).

[@frankrizzo5262]

What drawbacks… men have zero say. Women will divorce 100% of the time regardless

[@gabeo9474]

Who initiates 4 out of 5 divorces? (hint: it's not sons)

[@454slowride]

My son will never date or get married.

[@regulahdegulah1369]

No, we're just not going to get married🤷🏾‍♂️that's the inevitable conclusion my generation has drawn. There's absolutely zero benefits in marriage for men what so ever

[@gjmottet]

I am female can will never sign a marriage licences because if I love a man I would not want him to be liable for family court if things went sour. I have been married for six years in the eyes of a higher power, but will never let the govn't destroy my person. Grew up in the middle of my parent's nasty divorce and internalized the message that family court = BAD and to never get in a position it can control your life.

[@sprezzatura8755]

My God her voice is annoying.