engine design by shangshiqun from china

50 kinds of new style engines,designed by chinese, we need a parter , investment, or cooperator. 200000dollor, it is enough.If you have great interest, please call me 86-13604041314 or send me a email [e-mail] 。

[@zrebbesh]

I recognize all of these as being public-domain (from 507 mechanical movements, etc) or invented by other people.

[@USABarsa]

I think this video would win the "how many patent violations can I do in under 9 minutes" award!

[@BluntForceTrauma666]

+USABarsa: Heh, yeah. But remember, this is from Chy-Nah! The land where they don't give a _FUCK_ about copying designs they like and profiting from them. It's also the land where they don't even give a quarter-of-a-half-ass-shit about quality-control either...

[@markmark5269]

Fat? yeah, nah. Likely you're American, which explains the bigoted ignorance, so you would know fat, you want fries with that? Keep pointing at other countries while your own is falling apart around you if that what makes you feel better.

[@BluntForceTrauma666]

@Markey Mark - Shouldn't you be back in your little villiage of 17-million making shoe laces or tops for batteries or some other shit? Fuck off...

[@libertytrooper]

I have to interject here and I'm going to, somewhat, match your tone so that you completely understand. Americans put several people on the moon beginning 49 years ago at a time when the cultural revolution was killing off China's educated. That research, as well as that for the development of the atomic bomb in the 1940's, is still paying off today. Especially for the many Chinese students that have had to go to America to learn things they could not in China because everyone who knew anything there was DEAD (after the Japanese, Mao really should have known better).. And, the Americans have continued to evolve, if not beyond provincial social views, at least in original research. China does have a very serious IP infringement problems that its government does not give a damn about. Ironically, so did the United States when it first became the 'outsourcing destination' of the world. Labor always goes to both to where its cheapest and to where its least constrained by, oh say, such pesky things as rule of law. Finally, China truly lead the world in innovation... about 4500 years ago. Indeed, China could have been the dominant force for civilization and innovation on the planet:. If it had undergone the same rapid advances as did the west over the past two to three centuries. Do you not think it sad that 4500 years ago China had the same basic technologies that existed just prior to the Renaissance? If China had progressed I'd hazard to guess that, likely having skipped Rome and the Dark ages, we would be, at the very least, be colonizing Mars by now. Yet, thats not how history developed. Again, lots of educated people were (several times) killed off for no apparent reason other than the whim of some criminally insane bureaucrats and a Mongol invasion (which pretty much let everything stay the same as long as you didn't kill ambassadors [ah, the origin of the sanctity of Ambassadors: Who says the Mongols didn't contribute to history?] and paid the appropriate amount of tribute). I'd say that the one thing that China seems to have perfected, over the millennia, is murderous bureaucracies. Yup, that pretty much sums up the glorious history of China (unfortunately). So say what you will about the 'Murderous Western Colonial Powers'. Those powers didn't drop the ball of civilization when they had it in their hands. I'm, of course, paraphrasing and generalizing to the Nth degree: just like you. Oh, and the only reason that China holds most of the records you mentioned is because the rest of "the World" has dumped huge sums of money there because of one single thing: Huge amounts of cheap unskilled labor. When you go assuming that there aren't people who have made a study of China's history out there you might want to dial back your attitude. Its supposedly a global village now and we all have to 'get along'. At least until the next 'purge'. G'day.

[@markmark5269]

libertyhomo, amazing how everybody wants to quote China back in the bad old days. Of course we could go back further and start quoting slavery and the genocide of red indians, or even more recently, Blacks riding at the back of buses and segregation generally, how fucking conveniant you forget your own history when quoting others. We won't mention how many wars you have started and how you have fucked up the world until this very day spending 600 billion every year of your own people's money on that while they starve in the streets and walk away from their homes - and your congress right now just pulled your President into line to hate Russia so as the war machine will thrive further, you bunch of cunts. You're just a bunch of murderous cunts, and that's today, right now, not back in the 1960's. Oh wait, you were murderous cunts back then as well, everyone knows Korea and Vietnam, but there's many, many more if one looks. Difference is China stopped 50 years ago, you haven't. Bet you didn't know that America was the cause of millions of Chinese starving to death around the turn of the 20th century, it was you cunts and Japan's very fault that bought communism and eventually Mao to power, there's an inconvenient historical truth for you. In fact, Google America's direct involvement in Regime changes for the last 150 years for even more inconvenient truths you sanctimonious prick.. BTW, China has never started a war in history, go and research yourselves. Go have a hard look at your crumbling infrastructure, go look at all your million year old glorious bridges falling down, your shit rail system, your broken highways, your power grid that needs a trillion dollar upgrade and can't handle new energy until it gets it - yup, you're the world leaders and China's just a shithole, just ask any American who has never been there. Oh, and have a nice day!

[@willtipton100]

even though China is our top competitor, i'm glad to see the spirit of engineering creativity is alive and well there. right on

[@rodkeh]

My Shuttle-Cam engine is the most efficient, simplest, smallest and most powerful heat-engine that has ever or will ever be designed. No overall design will ever be more efficient. It is of course scalable but the basic unit has only one moving part, the Shuttle, which acts both as a piston and a impeller at the same time and derives torque from both at the same time and from the same fuel charge. This one moving part floats on a cushion of air and is almost frictionless. Nothing can touch it for power and efficiency, simplicity or cost of manufacture!

[@radracer2033]

I like the fact that all the patents they chose to copy are ones that have either already been proven not to work, or have no chance of ever working

[@solapowsj25]

China produces these CAD stuff. Once I got a spanner that was produced but some regions just touched each other like in the design. I had to get it welded again to give it practical strength.

[@sbelllido]

Another One scissor Design!!!!, It's incredible a patent granted over this idea. Please, see Ing. Taurossi in Argentina invented in the '70, also a Russian car was manufacture with this engine.

[@Bearthedancingman]

Every single engine shown was invented between 1880 & 2005. As far as I can tell. There's a couple I don't recognize. Well modeled and animated. At least 2/3 of the designs are from the 1890-1950 era. Lol.

[@cnchok8168]

you are right

[@markmark5269]

yes, but where does it say they are claiming anything else?

[@shentatsai]

ummm... this is just copy of from some other dude's stuff, how come those Chinese got to shame

[@TheRealFobican]

As if the russians copying the designs of the MYT engine wasn´t bad enough, the chinese wouldn´t hesitate to follow tracks too....

[@williegillie5712]

Nice try boys. But what are you doing about the centrifugal forces to the outside of the engine with those merry go round pistons. Doesn't sound or look viable to me lol. I like the turbojet engine idea. Just remember with the rotary idea your dealing with the seal issues of the past plus centrifugal forces that work against you at higher speeds. Some people are good designers but that doesn't necessarily mean they have the mechanical knowledge or discernment to know what is really happening to all those parts.

[@ddiabloll9840]

Thanks for bringing together many designs for us peers to review... lots of hate in the comments, pay no attention to them. us mechanical types seem to fight amongst each other like a religion war

[@libertytrooper]

Its just an advertisement. There isn't enough there to make any determination. Its like with LiquidPiston.com, there isn't enough there to replicate, on any level, success OR failure. And, interspersed with the rotary engines are obvious pumps and whatnot. So, its just a bit difficult understand, beyond advertisement, what the OP is attempting to convey back in 2013 :-)

[@libertytrooper]

I will admit that the models are somewhat 'visually pleasing'. Thats about all we can say though, isn't it?

[@user-sk9hl7si7l]

@@libertytrooper is liquidpiston any good ? 4 years later....

[@dawnrussell4838]

A lot of pretty cad design, does any of them even work? Most of the design looks like hydraulic pumps.

[@philhealey449]

Some stiff challenges on gas sealing, variable valve timing, heat rejection , tribology and gear tooth fatigue loading fronts apart from balancing. Always the next big thing is coming in IC engines

[@fernandobryant33]

Motor similar à um desenvolvido na Argentina, no entanto o motor argentino era a combustão. Realmente motores interessantes. Parabéns pelo vídeo.

[@andresjaramillo1482]

Motor rotativo taurozzi

[@truthmatters5536]

Amazing. Chinese engineering is very innovative. Turbojet will be replaced by Chinese engineering. Each one may have the best place to use in various industrial application.

[@captainboggles]

The first two are originally designed by Raphial Morgado, The Mighty Yet Tiny design. guess the chinese bought it.

[@driverjamescopeland]

captainboggles They're just variations of the "cat and mouse" engine. Patents have existed long before Rafael was even a thought. His Has the same issue (hence why we haven't seen it yet)... sealing.

[@DocWolph]

No.39 looks like a promising concept fora generator engine. As a final product I have trouble seeing it, but the idea appears to be there.

[@1955piet]

The internal combustion engine as we know it today is the answer to the steam engine. There has been minimal improvement in 100 years. The efficiency is at most 35% of the 100% fuel you put in, the rest is converted into heat. We need to be more economical with our energy. Any attempt to improve the internal combustion engine is carrying water to the sea! Let it go and put your intelligence into something meaningful.

[@SteveM45]

WOW very intresting!

[@Bearthedancingman]

At least 90% are patented

[@SteveM45]

MAybe but NOT to buy!!!!

[@wpyoga]

Never forget the mantra: Quantity over quality... or did I get it backwards? Hmmm...........

[@cliffcampbell8827]

If anyone is getting their Hope's up for the designs seen here...don't. Most of these won't progress beyond the animation stage of development. Even if there were enough developers and enough research money on tap to cover every possible expenditure, why would they? By the time any of the internal combustion ones made it to a consumer market, the consumers will be driving electric vehicles.

[@tarassu]

Good for pumping liquids, but not expanding gasses.

[@sippilandia]

I think some of this could work as hydraulic motors or pumps.

[@IvCastilla]

Nice animation, keep trying.

[@AndreLuiz-ip3fh]

beautiful models. but i will keep my vane motor. simple and robust.

[@andyedwards9011]

"this is a gigantic cheese to be shared, and a field to be explored" 😂

[@NoosaHeads]

Reciprocating engines are fraught with problems of stress and vibration. If they have a future, internal or external combustion engines have to be orbital or turbine in nature.

[@SuperFlash72]

👏👌👍💫🌠

[@filipeteixeira8671]

beautiful models! But as I said, models. Experimental prototypes are for the badass ones. good luck!

[@Cerberus984]

Most of these are stolen designs which is not surprising. The second one is Angel Labs Massive Yet Tiny (MYT) engine patented in 2008 in the USA. I don't see any rotary swing piston designs being viable as production or repair of the piston bores will be a complicated feat for durability. While all rotary designs of the past can achieve a remarkable output per displacement yet, their main flaw being incomplete burn of fuel and excessive oil burning. The only new engine design not built by a major manufacturer as we speak that I would predict as a viable design would be the achates opposed piston 2 stroke engine with unique pistons shape inducing swirl ensuring complete burn. I'll admit the design is inspired by the Nazi Junkers Jumo 205 which the modernized Achates adds a turbocharger to the original designs supercharger for better peak power curve and better alloys to mitigate the heat soak flaws due to every stroke is a combustion power stroke event. Ideally, to mitigate the emissions related components they should use CNG 75% / diesel 25% ratio below 2K rpm where NOx and particulate matter are a problem. These two fuels combined are ideal as the diesel is a lubricant while the CNG is a solvent. Mitigating the CNG or hypothetically gasoline fuel washing away the lubricity off the cylinder walls.

[@filipeteixeira8671]

I know most of them are stolen, but as I said, are beautiful models to insert in a slide show. At least the author, I guess, had the hard work of creating the digital models, simulate it, record and than edit. MYT isn't the first or the last of cat-and-mouse/ TRPE engines, there are several patents with minor modifications as an excuse to make a new patent. And yes, this engine is troublesome, but we achieved good results in prototype development. We discovered more problems than have been planned. Oil burning isn't the biggest issue, believe me. best regards

[@timtravasos2742]

Incredible design ideas.

[@beflix8140]

good luck sealing most of them in practice. Thats the issue with most modern more efficient reciprocating (or non reciprocating) engine attempts

[@bkucinschi]

Scissors-action engines.. have you heard of Kauertz engine, patented in 1960?

[@manuelexpositocarballada5414]

LOIMPORTANTE NO ES DIBUJAR SINO HACER ALGO ÚTIL CON EFICIENCIA Y FACIL

[@augustuscaesar2023]

Can you do a video on how # 9 works???

[@tirealert]

Combustion occurs in an external chamber then a valve opens and high-pressure gas is fed into the expansion chamber so it is similar to an external combustion engine. This engine will work but it will be inefficient, it would be more efficient if combustion occurs in the expansion chamber. The overall design is very complicated and sealing the engine looks to be difficult and expensive. The ME2 engine is much better than this.

[@sajidabdullah7037]

carry on.

[@deankay4434]

How many Mazda “Apex” seals where harmed during the making animation? And the post below, asking to use Liquified Atmospheric Gas, how many more processes and equipment are needed for that? Ask your weld gas supplier what go thru to make each gas or blends. If you want to increase volumetric efficiency on a high compression engine, using the heat of compression as the most efficient like the Nissan variable compression engine, just make a “Nitrogen” air filter. Then you have almost pure oxygen available to fill the cylinders. ASE Master Tech / Retired

[@yusupashari3725]

Too many component involve...MYT by Raphial Morgado still the best one..!

[@erichahn4057]

Taking someone else's idea does not make you a genius

[@5150jaki]

The video is beautiful, but is this CG advertisement? But everything is impatient

[@raycasey2474]

I invented a one stroke rotary engine Australian patent 2012201473 and US patent 9175562 with power stroke up to 90% of the stroke 2 strokes per revolution of the rotor, but no vehicle manufacturer has shown any interest. Why? Posibily the oil companies don't want it! Big business is dirty! Most search engines don't find it however it was patented in 2013 Australia and 2015 USA.

[@libertytrooper]

I took a look at your patent. Perhaps you should post a video of your working model.

[@libertytrooper]

From your patent text drawings, I cannot reasonably infer how the power-stroke works. Perhaps its the reference to the fairly undefined 'annular chamber' and the 'doors' that are causing me confusion.

[@THOMASTHESAILOR]

I googled your patent numbers and all that came up was pictures of naked ladies. They need more than one stroke, no wonder there's no interest..

[@kimeli]

But how do we know that you actually invented them, not just patent.

[@andresjaramillo1482]

No me imagino arreglar un motor de esos...

[@stanleymeyer3417]

Ehhh... Se olvidaron de nombrarme al principio...!! YO inventé la VOLTROLISIS del agua!!

[@pedrojosecampogarraza1668]

The internal combustion engine is less mechanical design and many more thermodynamic concepts !!!! You can put your engine in the trash and dedicate yourself to doing something else more positive.

[@johnhenke6475]

The same old problems of cooling sealing and lubrication are the reason you will never see one of these in the real world.

[@jebise1126]

4:57 no fuel needed? so it runs on love or something? rofl

[@ukaszdomanski4107]

To jest silnik Woźniaka jest to Polski wynalazek!

[@ricardocabaco1100]

I have seen so many revolutionary engines by now but were are they? Everybody just wants to get rich. We are doomed to as a species.

[@BigRodd91]

Ricardo Cabaco Don't worry! I'll make an engine too!😆

[@Learn_To_Trade_Profitably]

I've a more practical approach to a true rotary engine.. I've no money to get patent or prototype though. These eccentric, elliptical engines face huge imbalanced pressures and temperature

[@seaplaneguy1]

None of these will move the efficiency up to 60%+ across a wide range where it needs to be. You can get 80-90% of the fuel needs gone if you know how to do it. A piston crank is 5-10% city driving and 15-20% highway. If you can get 60% all the time you can get 3-6 times the fuel economy. NONE of these even begin to address the central issues needed to get 60% all the time, nor do they do energy recovery. My designs does....

[@chenyanxiang]

中国观光团，作出模型了么，有没实际应用的视频？

[@VK4KDD]

reduce complexity of engine design please.

[@joaquimvieira5674]

Looks more like wrist watches

[@ihsan.l9375]

Ahhh yess.... Designing without engineering basics

[@eugene251]

dude how many patterns will you copy,however the magnet motor generator might look promising but it is not at all,the magnet motors may have 50 % efficiency but they stop rightafter you have stopp giving them energy

[@johnhege6502]

There is indeed nothing new under the sun

[@genegarbis8746]

,CHINESE, Bill Gates AMERICAN FINANCIERS ????

[@ionelaobreja9253]

What is this melody called?

[@travismoore7849]

Nothing new or really all that practical.

[@billylai6]

現今世界的內燃機是 歐盟六， 但國內呢？ 幾天前霧霾嚴重，有新聞的睇頻，出租車司機說是 國三？？

[@tkmotors991]

They all look like the evolution of the same thing

[@electronicdawg]

If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bullshit!

[@grapsorz]

i have seen around half of these designs up thru the year. this is an animation of as many animations you can make from the patent office. not any real work done here.

[@Carlo-qj5jl]

OH NO!!! CHINA IS COMING!!!

[@muntee33]

Still stuck in the squeeze bang mindset huh? We need to think out side of the box. Ie; (off top of my head just now, a tesla turbine feed gas by a ‘screw’ type supercharger and jet engine type combustion chamber ...)

[@sahinbalammed4327]

My educational background is combustion engineer

[@akupehsluarketatAR]

Ok

[@TheHalusis]

shit, seen my idea concept in there

[@jasonsteiner57]

These systems are outdated compared to the "Turbo Encabulator"

[@andrewvida3829]

Chinese? The hell.

[@MikeJones-is1ti]

shut off the motor can I get a hallaugha for our kids to live free forever but Russell's 9cyl motor was perfect 3 at 3000

[@LLSemi]

Chinese design ? R U kidding me?

[@jst1man]

So nothing functional. Can't say I'm surprised.

[@paulellis7533]

I'm busy building a real engine (See my avatar) not a fantasy one! Great animations and graphics, but no hardware.....funny that! Only idiots seem to put their ideas on KZbin. If they had any merit whatsoever, they sure wouldn't make their ideas public.

[@KUNZR11]

I have an engine design in my head now for some time. It uses all the combustion power. No waste and has two moving parts. like you, Someday I will built the prototype.

[@user-me8jz4we9f]

어렵게 만들지말고 걍 모터 사

[@andrewhotko]

just copying works...

[@currentbatches6205]

Designs imagined and rejected by midwest hot-rodders by about 1960. I'll be happy to debunk each one and save you the patent fees, but I get $350/hr, and you can save a lot by keeping two concepts in mind: 1) The chamber is the key to IC engine design; corners don't work. 2) Even a good chamber only works if you can make the burning mixture do work instead of leaking out the side; you cannot seal flat surfaces. For those too dim to get it, I'll elaborate at the rate mentioned above. Carry on.

[@user-sk9hl7si7l]

stfu old twat,nobody cares what you offer

[@trapper1211]

4:57 they claim existance of a free energy device from magnets...

[@rokag3332]

Not at all

[@tnverma1053]

It's all copy of Wankel s

[@THESAMMUSIC]

中國式騙局

[@tigeroll]

To late for ANY kind of engine that "burns" fuel. Garbage!! I know, you spent a lot of time working on it.

[@heavycurrent7462]

Says an armchair engineer

[@mikeowens6291]

What's with the stupid music? I loved KZbin videos up till recently, but these days, we only seem to get people who can't speak making videos, and they think they can keep our interest with DUMB music. How's about opening the mike, and telling us a bit about your project, so that I can watch them for more than about 10 seconds, .......now.... where's that "HATE" button.....

[@excitedbox5705]

Funny how many people in the comments are screaming about stolen designs when the combustion engine was invented in Germany yet nobody is saying that Ford GM or Chrysler stole it. You can take a basic idea and improve it and change it or else nobody would be able to make anything because it has all been done hundreds of times. Anything they do in life somebody could claim they stole because it is all based on something that already exists. These commenters are all racist idiots. How funny that this video is from 2013 and the racist comments are all 2 years old when Trump was at the height of his racism campaign.

[@bussi7859]

If you have a CAD it does not make you a designer. This is pure crap