Engineering Geology And Geotechnics - Lecture 3

CLASS: GeoEng 341
PROFESSOR: Dr. David Rogers
DESCRIPTION OF COURSE: Study of procedures and techniques used to evaluate geologic factors for site selection and the design of engineered structures. Prerequisite: Ge Eng 275.

[@philbox4566]

I love that he is old school and has huge difficulties with the high tech IT. Hilarious how the students have to help him navigate around the computer. Love his real world business acumen that shines through here and there.

[@PACstove]

Im new to geology. Love this. I like how geologists battle lawyers. Never new that was a thing.

[@ksero1000]

Love this old school alpha male! Brains, skills, and humor, unfortunately an endangered species.

[@Lanse1984]

Sarcastic wisdom. The best kind

[@mmareviewer.2372]

we ain't going no where... the omega can only last for so long.

[@ksero1000]

@@mmareviewer.2372 THANK GOD!!! We might be isolated & silenced, but we love our good men! This country won’t last without you and without a heathy continual replenishment!

[@davidfranks8309]

Dr. David Rogers wow what an awesome person. You can tell he has so much experience in his line of work. I can tell do to the fact I have 46 years of experience in my line of work. I know my trade backwards and forwards inside and out eyes closed and open. He does as well I can tell.

[@pipingyourmama]

This is absolutely entertaining. I have taken a few trips out west, and the landscape is fascinating. This lecture gives a lot of explanation to why the landscape and some of the geological structures look the way they do.

[@MissouriSandTCourses]

@hilalvenus The book Dr. Rogers used for this course was 'Engineering Geology: an Environmental Approach' 2nd Edition by Perry H. Rahn. Hope this helps.

[@m.rezaahmadi4188]

Thanks for sharing these useful videos. Could you please share the PDF format of these files? Thanks a lot.

[@oussamaali8393]

i really love this teacher , he knows damn well that pictures speaks louder than words and to blast the student mind with endless texts is boring as hell. This guy teachs you real stuff and its damn funny @40:25

[@mivapusa]

As a geologist whose courses for some reason omitted soil mechanics, what I wouldn't give for a chance at copying those documents...

[@mohammedadam85]

this lectures is very nice an useful if you have any lectures from same university please upload them for other people in other countries

[@16handsoffunfunfun]

love these

[@sierpinski_cube]

At 1:37:00, says “drip, drip, drip is one million gallons per year”. I tried to calculate this, I got a very different answer. A “drop per second” isn’t well defined but let’s say it is 0.05ml per sec. Then per year is 0.05x60x60x24x365/1000 = 130 litres per year

[@hilalvenus]

These lectures are great. Could you please tell us the name and the author of the book he uses? He did not mention when introducing on Lec 1. Thanks!

[@derekmerry3309]

Top class channel 👍🙏

[@jyotikhatiwadaanischit5620]

I wish You had classes to us too sir.

[@codycox2465]

1:41:51 😂😂😂😂 these and Feynman lectures crack me up

[@hurt6145]

What music is played during the break?

[@namakfelfel]

amazing lectures , can you tell me where can i download these videos ?

[@nepalicricketfans2271]

where can i get those slides ??

[@engr.muhammadamarmunir5786]

Dear Sir, the download is not available for this video and some other lectures as well, can you remove thus restriction please.

[@CheleChilindra]

1:02:37 experience in pm team

[@BigBADSTUFF69]

I like the part where he yells

[@derekmerry3309]

Made me jump 😅..I'm nearly 60

[@CheleChilindra]

55:14

[@CheleChilindra]

Attorneys v engineers

[@CheleChilindra]

1:00:45 sugar levy

[@oussamaali8393]

rofl this guy is great , if you got german blood like me : i dont vant cheap i vant the stangth hhh

[@chybkassam8837]

سلام

[@morthim]

inselberg is the best name ever.

[@jackeki7689]

Don't move a woman fast if you make love so as you don't drain clay ..lol, btw thanks Sir🙏

[@ParanoidAndroid9]

can you email me the homework please, it would be easier

[@nibiruresearch]

know of a missing link in the education of geologists. They tell us that our planet Earth has the most to fear from an asteroid impact or volcano eruptions. But when we look at the many horizontal layers that we find everywhere on our planet, we clearly see the effect of a repeating cataclysm. These disasters are mentioned in ancient books like the Mahabharata from India and the Popol Vuh from the Mayans and others. They tell us about a cycle of seven disasters that separate the eras from the world. Certainly, regularly recurring global disasters cannot be caused by asteroid impacts or volcanic eruptions. The only possible cause is another celestial body, a planet, orbiting our sun in an eccentric orbit. Then it is close to the sun for a short period and after the crossing at a very high speed it disappears into the universe for a long time. Planet 9 exists, but it seems invisible. These disasters cause a huge tidal wave of seawater that washes over land "above the highest mountains." At the end it covers the earth with a layer of mud, a mixture of sand, clay, lime, fossils of marine and terrestrial animals and small and larger meteorites. Forests that existed are flattened and because of the pressure from the layers on top the wood is changed into coal. These disasters also create a cycle of civilizations. To learn much more about the recurring flood cycle, the re-creation of civilizations and its chronology and ancient high technology, read the e-book: "Planet 9 = Nibiru". It can be read on any computer, tablet or smartphone. Search: invisible nibiru 9

[@mivapusa]

It's nice that you have a strong faith. Remember though, that Jesus said, let be onto the Emperor what is the Emperor's. In other words, keep said faith out of the scientific community.

[@nibiruresearch]

@@mivapusa That is the wrong answer. Buddhist, hindu and Christian religions tell us about a recurring natural disaster. So denying this information is not wise for geologists.

[@mivapusa]

@@nibiruresearch It is the _correct_ answer when dealing with religions that, at best, record events no older than three thousand years old. In the geological time scale, that is less time than it takes you to press the 'reply' button. It simply is not relevant.

[@nibiruresearch]

@@mivapusa Again the wrong answer. Ancient knowledge is much older than you think. Just one example. n the encyclopaedia "Naturalis Historia" written by the Roman author Pliny is written: "According to Epigenes, the Sumerian astronomical observations recorded on clay tablets are 720,000 years old". So, that long ago people were watching the stars and able to write.

[@zsm1999]

He's 60 and regularly mentions sex regularly in front of college students. Not creepy at all

[@djblackprincecdn]

oh not talking about sex around *checks notes* grown ass adults