Everyone Can Be Rich

[@rj23032]

Who else thought he was going to give investment advice😂

[@Tmo2024]

Only you

[@songoku-jx3cb]

You

[@Byebyeee-c4w]

Obviously you

[@C_E_0]

That doesn’t factor in greed, lust, vanity, etc. Many people lack moral and/or ethical values for a eutopia like that to be maintained, let alone achieved.

[@zeeinvest9473]

They’ve abandoned religion & God altogether now, so yeah that definitely isn’t gonna be achieved. But I do think if everyone was a lot smarter in general, it would still be a way better world. Disputes would be moreso ideology based, and smarter people don’t sit around complaining about the past or crying over rejection.

[@chrislandgraf1926]

I thought the same thing.

[@heisenbergyo5578]

Well I hate to say it but moral and ethics can be subjective

[@Maya79800]

No one ever put the system into the account… people are never gonna be perfect…. But it is powerful system which run by defective people… figure out the outcome….

[@MarketingHarry]

We live in exciting times, no doubt. Doing creative and strategic jobs is gonna be more and more beneficial in near future!

[@abcdabcd8605]

​@@marcsuquerbe777why no?

[@alienmatrix7402]

Did he blink?

[@Aeresx]

​@@alienmatrix7402 Wtf if didn't blink it means lie.

[@NewFreedomPodcast]

Beautiful vision. Lift eachother up and we all benefit.

[@krakengaming3334]

And then artificial intelligence attack soon

[@theunnamed2440]

Narzists and psychopaths agree! 😂

[@HustleSavvy-f9o]

And the world will never do that. I know that for a reason. There will still be some evils ripping others up.

[@dragonniz]

I studied engineering and worked as an engineer for some years. Now with time and age, I realized how important social science is - we need capable social scientists to come up with a better education system, we need capable social scientists to analyze government policies and make them better etc. Engineering and the hard sciences may create tools, but without the social sciences to inform, update & revitalize the society alongside the progress of technology.

[@shreyanshraj8542]

I literally had that idea a year before but i dropped it because it was crazy to think that everyone would be passionate about doing a single task of innovation as some people quite enjoy what they are doing.

[@explorerduniya1688]

Hlo

[@explorerduniya1688]

R u really droped

[@ajaylalloo2496]

Brilliant man! Sincere and honest!

[@raghavsrivastava2910]

This one resonates just perfectly with me. 🔥🔥🔥🔥💯💯💯💯💯 Let's do it.

[@MoralsofMahabharatham]

All ricj people were poor kzbin.infomd47FVHlQSg?feature=share

[@Money-f5m]

there's a book called Secret Pathway To Triumph, and it talks about how using some secret tehniques you can attract almost everything in life it's not some bullshit law of attraction, it's the real deal

[@Claudineibispo2]

Thank you for sharing

[@GabrielDickerson]

Author? I can’t find it

[@Claudineibispo2]

​@@GabrielDickerson Naval Ravikant

[@Keplerbeing]

Could you please tell me Where can I get it?

[@GabrielDickerson]

@@Keplerbeing it doesn’t exist seems like

[@Hmm-hj5mg]

As someone once said, that a middle class man today has more than what the Pharaoh of Egypt had. Sure the common man doesn't have wealth, but every aspect of live and the standard of living from Travel, Medicine, Education, even More comfortable clothing, Food, etc... Is just an upgrade They didn't have refrigerators back in the day for instance and I can guarantee you no one knew that ice even existed. Until they explored naturally occuring glaciers. My point is yeah in the future the life and standard of living may be better than what we have now but even then you'd just feel like a middle class person.

[@astitvanigam9277]

Need longer sessions like these

[@preensmil6803]

It’s true, technology and labor are the things that make a country rich. If people were engineers they would create tech to do jobs faster better, and that’s why the US is better, bc of industrialization. Look at Mexico rn, the president is hiring engineers to create stuff and their gas prices are better than US now.

[@Harpreet06]

This is the problem with shorts. For example, I have 'enough' understanding of computers, can write some code and can build some hardware, but I'm not rich. So just having the education won't make you rich, its what you do with the skills that matter. Paul graham says you have to look for problems to solve, just having trouble finding these problems that I would enjoy solving.

[@someshyv]

If you know how to code and create stuff from scratch, i can assure you that it is really easy to be in the top 1%. In fact very hard to not be in top 1%

[@shanemurphy7277]

@@someshyv can you elaborate?

[@someshyv]

@@shanemurphy7277 Most people who say they know how to code, only know how to ape code from different forums. Their understanding of DSA and their ability to build a functioning product from scratch is all but absent. If you can develop the ability to write creative novel code that performs well and is up to the specification laid by the PMs and designers in the team, I can assure you that every single company will hunt you down to work for them. All the constraints of college, experience, work attire, cultural fit, etc are set aside if you are good. But of course, exceptions are only made for exceptional people.

[@steviewanderer]

You have the technical expertise but Unfortunately lack either the creative aptitude and/or the business acumen that will extract its maximum value or do any real damage in the competitive landscape. And that is the case with many entrepreneurs. They have one or the other but rarely all of them.

[@charleswalker2484]

He's saying that if we all worked together with these skills technology would advance enough that our basic needs are taken care of.

[@brucebane5396]

If everyone learned computer programs then the suply of tech labourers will increase leading to reduction in there salary and again making them poorer than society.. Do any job which has less supply that's the only way to become rich

[@RapidBlindfolds]

Exactly - I don’t get why someone as otherwise smart as Naval doesn’t consider this

[@jimihendrixx11]

The flipside is that many or most big innovators had no training or education in the hard sciences at all but they worked with specialists who did😊

[@vaib-in]

When everybody could do the labour work it was the norm , when everybody is trained as a scientist engineer and hardware it will be the norm and norm never makes you rich those with skill/education, people management/skills and problem solving skills are the ones that actually stand out and get rich

[@UROOZFATIMA190]

That's true it's all about education and creativity.

[@BenedettaLucciano]

Secret Pathway To Triumph is so unique. I can’t believe I hadn’t heard about it sooner. It’s amazing how life-changing this can be.

[@cake8211]

All of the antiwork people who are complaining about bad wages are simply not in STEM.

[@pharrell9024]

yep, they probably work normal jobs

[@husgrnd2429]

Even stem wages shit

[@gomes8335]

Not everyone has to be stem.

[@husgrnd2429]

@@gomes8335 more people should be cuz all other jobs have alot of bloat, dont need that many HR and managment bozos

[@mountainjews]

Ah yes you should have to have a stem degree or be broke and starve to death

[@simomeliani3707]

how is a hypothetical gonna make you rich

[@anshumanagrawal346]

Talking in abstract what-if's is just misleading, there's so much being ignored here, there's no reason to expect everything would work out properly in such a short period of time like 5 years even if every single human being was properly educated in a specific science related skill

[@user7966]

yeah its a load of crap, not saying not all of what he say is but some. What ever keeps the slaves working. Fight for your fair wage in your contracts. Thats how we all get rich together.

[@GKoliKlinlor]

Secret Pathway To Triumph blew my mind. I’ve shared them with friends, and they’re all amazed at the shifts in their mindset.

[@prakashp99999]

A genuine egalitarian thought !! 👏🏻

[@Anton-zb9dc]

Naval, if you mean by being rich loosing any sort of poverty risk as dying of hunger and such than check University 25 experiment. We are not made for happiness and easy life, we are warriors, the most aggressive species on our planet, otherwise we wouldn't win an evolutionary game. The strongest should win to spread genome, and all people are not equally strong, that's the rules of the game. Nowadays money is valuable, and typically shows your strength in society, but if everyone would get rich money wouldn't even matter anymore as there would not be deficit. This positive thinking position comes into play with age, don't say that you are too old for critical thinking

[@Sensimuse]

I agree 100%, the idea that we’d somehow shed our innate warlike tendencies with enough individual wealth is, if not fully absurd, then at least misguided. You can’t ignore the warborn nature of humanity and that with everyone’s wealth being equal we’d just find another metric for power and associated social ladder to climb.

[@Anton-zb9dc]

@@Sensimuse exactly 💯

[@sanjayyethipathi]

and you dont think knowing and understanding this will feedback into our mind/biology? if not then you're pointing at something saying its not ideal but cant be fixed. then how is it wrong?

[@Plum96]

"There are no solutions. Only tradeoffs." - Thomas Sowell You say that we are the "strongest," but we're really just highly adaptable. The tradeoff for this this adaptability is that human beings have the longest childhood. The cost of having the blankest slate means there's a lot of learning to be done, and you spend a long time being dependent on your parents for survival. Compare a toddler to a baby chimp. The Chimp is more likely to survive in the wilderness than the toddler since the chimp will develop stronger arms faster and learn to climb faster. The Chimp will essentially develop better tools for survival faster than the toddler. You say the "strongest" should win and spread their genome, but what does it mean to be "strong" in the 21st century? And if only "strong" people spread their genome, how do we know we're not removing something valuable from the gene pool from people who aren't labeled as "strong"?

[@kiranraj_al]

People dedicated to improving the quality of life for everyone and ensuring that all individuals have access to a decent standard of living.

[@joefunk76]

Not everyone is inclined to study every subject. There is a level of creativity required in ambitious intellectual endeavors that probably can’t be practically taught beyond some point.

[@Anton-zb9dc]

That's simplifying, not everybody can be reach. Even time is not specified, somebody is going to die poor tomorrow. It sounds great, but economists still struggling as nobody knows how society would work with such a rapid technological progress. If robots take over people's job how could we technically earn money and get reach?

[@nikhilmuthukrishnan7222]

Yeah this is a perfect answer, economists around the world are trying to solve this and his solution is simply become an engineer or doctor? That's too bare

[@Anton-zb9dc]

I respect him and I know that he reads smart books with sceptical view on humans, our knowledge and abilities to read the future, but sometimes he forgets that he is also only a human. For motivation - good speech, but it has a lack of constructivity

[@sanjayyethipathi]

if we had robots working for us, then there is no expenditure in terms of money/wealth. then money & wealth would lose its meaning and there would be no point in being rich out of insecurity. but isn't that an ideal state of existence? isn't that rich in that sense?

[@erikseberozvoj]

by being rich i think he doesnt mean money but true wealth in terms of goods and services

[@blum3141592]

Came here from his video called Make Bold Guesses and Weed Out the Failures lmao

[@SalamHajjar]

The concept of Secret Pathway To Triumph blew my mind. It’s like finding a cheat code for financial abundance.

[@village_guys]

Helps alot

[@MrSasukeyu]

The problem is that we adapt too quickly to the situation that we are in, we will as soon as possible feel poor again and want more, just feeling not satisfied, our lives today was the dream of our incesters once ! The poorest one of today was the richest one once

[@AdamOBrien-d1z]

I partially agree with this and this leads to the argument of what is a good standard of living. Since that also depends on the country you live in and even area. Whether a city or small town.

[@Ashishsharma-fw8nu]

Although i agree and also like this thought, but i want to ask which jobs is he referring to when he says creative and entertaining jobs?

[@schwaarnkreddy7805]

Non-engineering and non-technological jobs . Engineering & Technology jobs require 'dumbass memory power ' and a herd-mentalitied 'linear mentality' called logic.That of the sheep! Because Memory is the worst enemy of Creativity! Creative people invariably have a Non-Linear Mind without a modicum of memory and they will be found only in Humanities, Liberal Arts & Arts colleges. Those among them with an innate salesmanship/marketing mind, will become huge successes and score riches in the Creative & Entertaining arena !!!

[@pns5013]

We would have wonderful lives 🤣

[@AlfredoLopez-do5ed]

I like Naval and generally agree with a lot of his ideas. But this sounds like BS. Then again it's a 51 second clip, so probably out of context.

[@isandoval00]

Agree.

[@jacktinney]

why does it sound like BS to you

[@davidgutierrez3312]

Not BS. If only 5% of the 15-64 population ages were scientists (hard sciences) or engineers we'd be terra-forming Mars.

[@AlfredoLopez-do5ed]

@@davidgutierrez3312 if…

[@AlfredoLopez-do5ed]

@@jacktinney anytime there’s mention of “everyone can…” I kind of laugh. It’s a nice thought, romantic and utopian. If people were different then things would be different. If things were different then everything would be different. People being what they are, the world is as it is. The rest is a bunch of “could’ve, would’ve, should’ve”

[@Anchal503]

He's accent and voice👏👏

[@Isaslt]

Full interview?

[@tejuontrends]

What about Nature and energy sources for the robots it would be hard to maitain sustainability, solar pannels are not that much efficient

[@AdamOBrien-d1z]

I also disagree with this because not everyone is inclined towards certain subjects and a lot of people the incentive is money. Also some would yes but a lot of people I know would just smoke weed all day and drink alcohol and never push themselves to do anything. Which isn’t inherently bad but by nature if you don’t produce and only consume you’re not likely to do well. In modern society producing value has taken many different forms than before so idk.

[@sonusagar2887]

what is movie name

[@varunrawat7160]

I like this guy

[@astrittollovina5807]

I was about to take my shift at MCD’s. I don’t know what to do now

[@acuyogaa]

Become rich - kzbin.infoMppTUes4qG8?feature=share

[@asadalikhanyousufzai6059]

😂😂😂 it's all bullshit

[@HallaBol-o6n]

Except food and protection of physical body, every thing else are just for entertainment for our brain to live in this earth. Food and Security of our body are most essential things to live, if by any means like robots growing and cooking food for us, providing security to us, then everybody will be free from any dependency. For the rest of we either researching or innovating something.

[@Philosophie21]

True, but perhaps a bit exaggerated. There would be a whole bunch of problems to solve to achieve this situation. It wouldn't be as easy as it sounds. The minimum would be 50 years and the probable would be 200 years.

[@americandesitraveler8607]

I bought that majic wand from universal for $40 couple of years back for my son . 😂😱🙋🏼‍♀️✌🏻

[@xtr3im]

HEAL jobs are also important

[@Saurabh.Nikhade]

wow so interesting man, im thinking about the practicality

[@trader17112]

Name the channel plzz

[@krishnagarde848]

What's name this great person

[@LyVuongXuyen]

Anyone else here obsessed with Secret Pathway To Triumph? It's like discovering a secret treasure map for wealth!

[@nigamjogadia356]

So many engineers so many biologists so many scientists.....more supply than demand....😂😂😂...

[@StrongerBeliever]

There is always demand for valuable work. Robots are valuable. Code is valuable. Someone will definitely pay for these, if they work and solve problems. Simple.

[@nigamjogadia356]

​@@StrongerBeliever 💯

[@AdamOBrien-d1z]

⁠@@StrongerBeliever I think the argument or point was it may be valuable now. But if everyone could do it then it wouldn’t be rare or valuable. Image in old times if there was one craftsman who made bows or boats then everyone would need him. Now imagine if everyone could knew how to make a bow or boat. No one would need him.

[@jacoboreyes3160]

He describes a Utopia. And Utopias: 1) don't happen 2) movements that try to implement them end up in Dystopias.

[@vinayakambekar6863]

But this one not completely utopian...utopian world is more like a world without a job and the people are getting all the benefits without doing the hardwork... The food and the entertainment is free ... But this one's impractical too...not everyone is built for smart things or same thing

[@someloser5103]

​@@vinayakambekar6863 that's not entirely why it's impractical, the reason why is more tedious; one, we need people to do things other being engineers, we need garbage men, preschool teachers, and cheap labors to keep our society afloat, if everyone starts doing one job than the system falls apart (he said everybody not me), we can't just rely on the fact that maybe in five years that cleaning trash will be automated when we are living in the now and the trash outside is getting stacked real fucking high; Second, not everyone likes engineering/science, humans are different and like to do different things; and Third, because our system will just make us disadvantaged in a different way, like having people do the work cheaper because it's a replaceable job making the places more competitive and hostile, leaving a workspace where everyone is fighting with each other over money because that's how capitalism works. His idea is serious idealism at best and idiotic utopian dribble at worst.

[@StrongerBeliever]

Incorrect. The answer is obvious, there would be MORE automation and resolution of problems if we had more people educated as problem solvers who can build solutions. In fact, having a mere million people (America has over 300 million) working on robotics would yield astronomical growth in the robotics field very likely, and the automation curve would go exponential. Robots would very likely be doing all those jobs you complained about, not immediately, but extremely QUICKLY. Do you understand now? More problem solvers = More robots being made = Better robots = Less work with hands = Less work = Society not occupied with work Pretty simple to understand.

[@nsiddiqui25]

There will always be a Zio out there no matter what to claim what's yours.

[@brahm3458]

Just trained politicians & policy makers as a scientist or engineer.

[@ofofononoumoren]

He has stayed consistent on this position for the longest😂

[@sibinmathew7985]

Wow even for someone like me who nods and agrees with everyone ,this sounds like bs .

[@imdeexpert5828]

Cos ur made of bs

[@kanishknarula1874]

What colour is naval’s bugatti

[@cxa011500]

Let's make it happen!!!

[@Anonymous-yf8ur]

The logic would only work if everyone had equal money at the start and even then money will start accumulating to one side whoever is wiser/better at making money. So in a few generations boom everything would be kinda back to present day. Sadly the world is really "Survival of the fittest"

[@999NRG]

I know many people who can't do basics of engineer or science. It's for the cream layer of society.

[@davidgutierrez3312]

They can't do it because they weren't educated in math and sciences as children.

[@schwaarnkreddy7805]

Yeah, you are right: engineering and science disciplines just require "dumbass memory" without a modicum of Creativity! Creativity is the first casualty when memory and "an absolutely uncreative linear mentality called logic" are the only prerequisites ....and a sizeable student population raised on a sickening staple of homogenized education which ensures a deeply uncreative,herd-mentalitied sheep at work place. You call them cream.Shit also rises to the top .Problem is you mistake shit for cream and gloat over it! What a pity!!! That's why ALL Sciences (including Mathematics & Medical Sciences) and Technologies are FLAWED, resulting in mere postulates in the garb of scientific laws getting disproved in the following centuries &decades AND technologies reaching their obsolescence within months!

[@karansarin1986]

Rich is a relative term. If you are rich, someone is relatively poor to you. So NO, everyone can't be rich.

[@sierra9713]

Who is raising our babies and caring for our elderly?

[@MyLOLVideoSEnjoY]

This guy speaks truth that is possible but not probable due to corruption and religion.

[@fullmetaltheorist]

I agree.

[@fullmetaltheorist]

Back here after 2 years. I'll be back one day.

[@jabrilbalakrishna]

Wonderful lives or...complete and utter tyranny. Wherever the wind blows

[@maniaustralian]

Nice ❤

[@bettermindset2699]

This is extremely simplistic and unrealistic expectation of what people would and could do if we all studied STEM.

[@Mert-pd2ht]

Honestly why you lot hating on this clip? All he does is, offering a hypothetical solution. The problem is not the sender, it’s YOU the recipient in the comments.

[@emmj_images]

💯💯💯

[@QUANT_Trader88]

Dream come ture I wish this would happen

[@amulyatechnologyassociates]

Good exercises 😓 Excellent to learn with @naval 🎉 to think 🤔 talk 💬 and self-educate. Science and Technology: to improve time because of the robotic, soft, and hard technology. People would work with well-being to balance between 75/25 to a bit 80/20 at the same time living a wonderfully healthy lifestyle. Poverty to delays in its faster-reaching process. Charity and institutions play a big role. We support @navalR

[@henry8706]

Just like those Chinese TikTok, they have bots for everything in the house 😃

[@investwithjiri]

It looks promising, and with the help of AI the world can increase productivity so much that people will be able to do just what they want. It also opens up the possibility of unconditional income.

[@zelalemmekonnen8030]

"That's just the tyranny of soft expectations"

[@saturn580]

People confuse credentials with education because there's a lot of money in selling worthless credentials.

[@joelab.c]

Yep for all the things I agree with what he says, this is a total 180°. It is not soft expectations, and what's with "not social sciences"?

[@deborahshampoe-bg2ek]

brillant

[@laurettapaul7040]

and who is in charge of the education curriculum? seemingly the authorities that want us to be just smart enough to .... get a job, pay taxes, save money.... they do not teach the public in finances to be wealthy.

[@homedelNG]

Who will pay for the hardwares and services...if we're all capable of doing the same thing. The person/people that will pay those scientists definitely gotta be doing another job...if not, your engineering scientists will die broke. Demand and supply.

[@kdizzy07]

If you can "write some code" or "Build some hardware" you're not gonna get rich. Also, every job taken by robots will create a lot of unemployment. Some people might be able to pivot to a new carrer but all of them will be at a disadvantage compared to the existing workforce. This will affect their ability to get employed and their wages.

[@jacktinney]

if "everyone" could write some code or build some hardware. meaning "most people" to your second point, is it a bad thing that wheat is no longer harvested by hand by workers and instead is harvested by machines?

[@kdizzy07]

@@jacktinney I don't get your correction to my 1st point. I'm saying that writing some code or building some hardware is not enough to get rich. Regarding the 2nd point, its not a bad thing because we still have a lot of low skill labor that is not automated yet. But ask a Factory worker 10 years from retirement if its a good thing he was fired since they automated his job. It all depends on perspective. Once all low skill jobs are done by robots, we'll probably have a problem.

[@jacktinney]

@@kdizzy07 to the first point - Naval wasn't saying that if YOU write some code you can be rich. it was a thought experiment. He said If EVERYONE had some basic science skills, we could automate almost everything, which would exponentially increase the total wealth of society - everyone would be rich. To your second point, I suppose. I'm sure some people who were put out of a job in the past due to automation were not happy but as a whole automation increases total wealth.

[@kdizzy07]

@@jacktinney but let's be realistic, this is not what you would call "rich", it's more like comparing developing countries to developed countries. The average person will be better off in socio-economic terms and have access to better resources but you will still have unemployment, poverty, crime, addictions, mental health issues. I do get it now that the thought experiment is what if we could give everyone the best education and "prime" them for success. It would help but it wouldn't be perfect since humans are not perfect.

[@seriously58]

..oh yeah..robots....that one ^^ It is that guys answer to all issues. Nuclear Fusion reactors on the Moon? ROBOTS!!!!!!

[@ABe-z7x]

Whats his name

[@marioeid930]

Part of what brings value is how plentiful something is or isn't. Air is free its everywhere. His idea is wrong, who will do the things no one wants to do, take trash out or clean your yard. Definitely not as simple as hes making it

[@pranayg8092]

"If everyone is rich then nobody rich"

[@MrMeVerce]

"If nobody is rich then everyone is poor" "If everyone is poor then nobody poor" "If nobody is poor then everyone is rich" Now read your comment then read my reply ( And so on , it's a Never ending loop 🤯🤯🤯🤯😂😂)

[@abcdabcd8605]

​@@MrMeVercethen, nobody is neither rich nor poor.

[@bobbyjohnson5637]

Everyone can be abundant in there resources.

[@karthikrajar7676]

Everyone can be rich if you actually understand how resources, money, capitalism, demand supply works...

[@JAYl97]

​@@MrMeVerceyou gotem! 👏🏽 Well done.

[@stealthinator16]

A logical gap between everyone doing hard science and "we would all be done within five years". No good reason to conclude that utopia will be achieved after 5 years or any x number of years if everyone is educated.

[@newshot3191]

it is not that everyone is educated ... they are educated in hard science .... did we not hear the same thing. this means there wouldn't be freaking annoying politicians or people in social science who try to ruin us all. really? 8 billion people who either engineer or scientist need more than 5 years to trasnform the world that way? btw he did not say utopia.

[@precioustime2489]

I just thought the same two days ago and could not sleep at night thinking...

[@ThuanNguyen-bo9ig]

"Imagine ...." that's where the problem lies, hahah.

[@RealityTrailers]

Reality is imagination. ~Neville Goddard

[@BonkersClipsBlips]

the Wand .. what are we going to do about that WAND !!

[@ddn6299]

I am thinking this in my dreams before seeing this video. I am now confident my thinking is not bad

[@SurrogateActivities]

Would be pretty funny to see that, how it backfires and doesn't go his way at all

[@Th3RealDealGaming]

Even in a world like that there are going to be people that want to work and be a plumber, electrician, construction worker, etc. it’s impossible to make everyone happy.

[@jimihendrixx11]

Would still exist but morph

[@7FrLopez]

❤❤❤❤❤

[@VS-hs1pb]

I think that's going to be the case 10 years down the line

[@abhishekn7200]

I don't think everyone can be rich even if everyone is educated. Our economy is not built that way.

[@UxJoy]

... our economy is not gamed* that way. ✌️

[@brahmabull4004]

you can't make such a sweeping statement and not back it up with anything buddy

[@jacktinney]

Why

[@UxJoy]

@@brahmabull4004 clearly you haven't heard of the cantillion effect. Also... yes I can?

[@nikhilmuthukrishnan7222]

By definition rich is a 1% thing

[@Isaac-st8jh]

Heavy thought. Nice outcome to AI though

[@AdamOBrien-d1z]

This is a very nice idea on the surface. And I would be 100% for it. But there are so many flaws to the logic and reasons why it hasn’t happened.

[@christopherous]

Yes naval but we still need art and social sciences too keep us entertained now

[@ShephardInvestments-o9z]

Anyone can get rich with the right mindset.

[@AdamOBrien-d1z]

I disagree. I think stem is harder but more so because of the time required. What I disagree with is that not everyone wants to do a degree is stem or a degree in general. Also if everyone did the same five degree it would be oversaturated like software or programming right now which lowers the demand and lowers the value. The market rewards rare and hard to replicate skills. Also the Chinese schooling system is a lot harder than the western and we haven’t been terraforming mars. They also hold almost a fifth of the world’s population.

[@Dskrib]

Everyone already is rich, they just don’t know it. Remember history. Most people don’t want to be rich, they want to be richer than everyone else or they want the richer ones to be less rich