Everything is happening that has already happened

1. Heart Phenomenon
"Since I met you about a year and a half ago, I have a phenomenon I experience in the heart area. It’s an ache that usually happens when I’m around you or just before or after seeing you. Do you have any comments on this phenomenon?"
2. Linear Time and Happening
"Everything is a happening that has already happened. Could you comment on how everything is a happening that has already happened and how it relates to linear time?"
3.Dreams and Projections
"Is the world we see in dreams the same kind of projection as the world we see in waking life?"
4. Peace vs. Numbness
"I feel a little empty or numb because I no longer experience extreme highs or lows. Is this peace, resignation, or numbness?"
5. Working Mind vs. Thinking Mind
"Can you elaborate on the difference between the working mind and the thinking mind, and how they relate to happiness and suffering?"
6. Acceptance of Destiny
"How do we reach a level of acceptance where we fully embrace the pleasure and pain of life as destiny?"
7. Impersonal vs. Identified Consciousness
"Who is speaking-impersonal consciousness or identified consciousness? How do they differ?"
8. *Memory of Impersonal Consciousness*
"I remember being in a state of impersonal consciousness, even before birth. Is this valid or just a confusion?"
9. Purpose of Happiness
"What is happiness, and how does it differ from pleasure or pain?"
10. Destiny and Predetermination
"Is everything predetermined from the moment of conception? How does this influence our lives?"
11. Process of Returning to Impersonal Consciousness
"What is the end of the process of returning to impersonal consciousness, and how does it relate to happiness?"
12. State of Pure Happiness
"Is happiness the nature of impersonal consciousness? How can one experience it as a separate entity?"
13. Teachings of Ramana Maharshi
"What does Ramana Maharshi say about the ego and its relation to happiness and consciousness?"
Let me know if you'd like a deeper analysis of any specific question or part of the conversation!

[@mavib703]

Thk u so much for uploading. Mr Ramesh brings a smile to my soul. I luv him & i bless him soo much. ❤ Thk u Sir for all that u hv done for me. 🙏

[@fourtwentythree]

that's Lisa Cairns back there the youtuber

[@lillysummer5590]

Fabulous!! ❤❤❤

[@ninabanaulicar7618]

Thank you 🙏

[@krishnapartha]

This was tough one to watch. I pray for the Frenchman who had parental love issues.

[@michaelmcclure3383]

And thankfully Ramesh finally accepted the mans experience. Because previously there was this either/or identified consciousness v impersonal consciousness conceptual split.. then he settled on 95% universal consciousness (hence the objectless happiness) and 5% identified consciousness (hence the memory).. But the fellow can't deny his own experience can he, so the concept has to fit the experience, not the other way around. If its only Ramana Mahashi that we can go for reference and apparently not Nisargadatta.. (that was odd but ok) then he did differenciate between the dipping into this well of satchitanada and then seeming to come out of it.. (the identified consciousness becoming active again along with a sense of doership)...and a natural samadhi in the presence of perceptions and interactions. So this dipping into satchitanada can happen, apparently fairly rarely without perceptions, but it should demonstrate a lot about happiness being ones own Self nature.. it should, because there are no objects yet the fullness of happiness is clearly there...it has nothing to do with 'daily living' and attitudes and others and all that becauce there are none there, no others, no objects. That teaching of Ramesh's deals with the waking and maybe dream state, when identified consciousness is more in the foreground and the sense of doership becomes an obscuration to ones innate happiness. So the absence of doership is also the absence of others (as doers to love or hate) hence the happiness. Obviously it's a natural samadhi because it's your nature, not some rare state or experience of something else, So since its what we are then it naturally shines when the obscurations are removed and the connection with the source remains unbroken.

[@sattwa2]

@@michaelmcclure3383It wasn’t a matter of Ramesh accepting or not accepting his experience-the fellow’s understanding of his experience was simply incorrect and wasn’t able to receive what Ramesh was saying. So Ramesh changed his approach.,

[@michaelmcclure3383]

@sattwa2 oh really, please tell us what he misunderstood about his experience? He was saying he was experiencing something not exactly crystallized as identified consciousness... and not quite deep sleep and this was eventually reconciled in Ramesh saying it was 95% impersonal consciousness and 5% identified consciousness. Ramesh was initially sticking to the binary of identified consciousness in the waking and dream states and impersonal consciousness in deep sleep.. and that didn't quite fit his experience did it.. If you know Mandukya Upanishad the 4th isn't concieved of as deep sleep.. its the ever present awareness that is continuous in and appearing as the alternating states (sleep dream, waking), but is never itself limited and that is pretty much how Nisargadatta saw it.. which the Frenchman pointed out i think.. But the Frenchman did fall into the trap of thinking he was experiencing the 4th 'state's and the 4th isn't a state... he was however experiencing an in between state and actually Guadapada in his commentary on Mandukya does talk about that. For example, absorption.. nirvakalpa samadhi.. isn't deep sleep is it.. because its not unconsciousness.

[@sattwa2]

You don’t have to agree with Ramesh’s concepts, but his way of working with students was brilliant. You mention Gaudapada-For a thorough treatise on the Māndukya Upanishad read Gaudapada’s Māndukya Kārikā. There are 215 verses divided into four sections. But who’s ready to really grok it? The beauty of Ramesh is the simplicity and practicality of his teachings. Take all the 700 verses of the Gita and they boil down to one essence teaching-The surrender up of doership. It’s the whole essence of Vedanta.

[@michaelmcclure3383]

​​​ @sattwa2 i agree with that point on non doership and practicality, no issue with that. Now it is possible to have the effulgence of satchitanada or happiness that one experiences in deep sleep in the waking state.. that's samadhi, either when the mind is completely inactive like in nirvakalpa samadhi or in the presence of objects as the 'natural state' in either case the 'me' is in abeyance or absent. Thats all the poor fellow was trying to say... Yes, I know the Mandukya Karika. I think the Frenchman was vaguely referring to it, he even brought a chart and he was saying Nisargadatta says the same, which he does, even if he tended not to bring up Upanishads and commentaries.

[@Itwasrealbutnotfun]

I’ve kinda had enough of the pleasures too. At this point I’m pretty much waiting to move on. Life is strenuous and effortful. I have become pretty disinterested. Kina over it.

[@Taehuti]

dont give up

[@Itwasrealbutnotfun]

@ why?

[@Taehuti]

@ your mind talks to much to thy soul and it make your inner cry its smelly perfume to your spirit that wants you

[@acceptinglife6491]

Me too

[@Itwasrealbutnotfun]

@@acceptinglife6491 ugh. Sorry. I mean, The one that’s tired of it is ego and therefore not real, but yea, I get it.

[@bishop2051]

Ramana Maharshi is the guy you want to study. He was the most straightforward and he was the most accurate

[@bishop2051]

If you listen to too many people's words or even too many words even from the right guy you're just going to mind f*** yourself it's more about doing than learning

[@rameshchand2599]

One can understand Ramana only if He wants !!!!

[@jonmustang]

He's wonderful. So clear, no metaphysical concepts, he just directed questioners back to their own existence.

[@bilimoriafirdaus]

🙏💛

[@ALOKPATIL-g7o]

❤

[@sattwa2]

This was 2007-Not 09

[@rajendrachavan3394]

❤🙏👍

[@KKBPradeep]

🥰

[@JoelMiller626]

Lisa Cairns sitting behind him.

[@matthiasdornfeld7551]

oh ja

[@Tia.K.C]

I clicked because that women in the thumbnail looks like Kjersti Flaa. Then she talked. Sounds like her too. I’m also going through an ascension right now. What a weird world.

[@ozlembodemer9376]

Lisa Carins is also @the Satsang 😌 student became a teacher now.

[@shanksatutube]

Also Roger Castillo. I think they were seeing each other for a while.

[@ozlembodemer9376]

@@shanksatutubeyes, she talked about him.

[@pIx-InverseIQ]

I wish the young guy could fully describe his memory. The guru was discarding him... and parroting the teachings of Mandokya. Then went on a rant of his own experience & realization.

[@lillysummer5590]

You cannot know (judge) what compassion the Guru has and why he says or does anything