Excellent talk, what she says at minute 29:35 is key for us, the non-statisticians who use statistics very often. Transformed data: "Reasonable normal in the neighborhood of the mean".
@Misuci3 жыл бұрын
Kristin Lennox, PhD Data Science Consultant, Managing Scientist at Exponent San Francisco Bay Area 500+ connections > Great presentation ! What a great sense of HUMOUR !
@VaShthestampede29 жыл бұрын
Great talk. Thanks for sharing!
@Sharpodiplomat2 жыл бұрын
"Randomization is pretty much the only thing we have to protect us from unknown unknowns."
@auto_ego5 жыл бұрын
51:00 "starps working"? Is that shorthand for a brief stop followed immediately by a start?
@noneya81004 жыл бұрын
Starps indicate the beginning of the End. The Start of the Stoppage.
@lm581423 жыл бұрын
27:28 "We know they're very tiny cause we've been using the same drop-hammer for years."
@igordeocosta2 жыл бұрын
Amazing talk! I've learned a lot from it! Thank you!
@EvaSlash9 жыл бұрын
6:00 Why did she say statistics is banned in social psychology?
@EvaSlash9 жыл бұрын
+OpiatedBliss So by that do you mean they are not true statisticians and must abide by the scientific community? I always wondered how much mathematical/statistical training psychologists have in actually understanding the "under the hood" theoretical nature of the methods and techniques they use.
@demr042 жыл бұрын
Because the abuse of p-values
@namehidden88543 жыл бұрын
I'd argue the problem lies both in training and in the methods themselves.
@demr042 жыл бұрын
The problem is always in the assumption. Now with metalog distribution, you don't need to asume anything, but it become difficult to "analize statistically" just a buch of coeffcient from a multilinear regression.
@zaibatsu85822 жыл бұрын
43:21 - Let me introduce you to 2016 and 2020...
@ct8veylm3kzj683 ай бұрын
Thanks. Great.
@pieterverhoeven16422 жыл бұрын
“Somethings that happens *a lot* to statistics consultants…” I was dissappointed there was no interjection from the audience.
@alpa14105 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, your lectures are very interesting
@RichardAlsenz3 жыл бұрын
A wonderful observation. If you would like to improve the model let me know, I can show you how Mother Nature does it. And, it is has nothing to do with the same plagued physics used today.
@valuesim2 жыл бұрын
Great!
@zoozolplexOne2 жыл бұрын
interesting !!!
@rkpetry9 жыл бұрын
1. Why is the unicorn labeled with a lowercase sigma [σ]? Is sigma [σ] a 'myth'? 2. I asked a friend working toward her actuarials the following: "Suppose in a place there's a 30% chance of rain, and an east wind is blowing so there's a 50% chance of rain, Which is it, 30%, or 50%, (depends on what we agree we know)..." 3. Now, while that may seem 'tricky', let's try a real-world example that LLNL scientists know: In order for a special relative to get up to 10% the speed of light he accelerates one gee for 35 days... but... all during that time the far ends of his simultaneity train are running late so he calculates and sees and they-are creeping closer or further away: the difference being very-nearly proportional to the velocity, there's no such thing as an inertial equivalence principle, and, the zeroeth-plus-second order effect because creeping exponentially adjusts the lateness to the distance, is as big as Einstein's gamma... So, What, is it, that, we agree, we know... now...
@jonasmaugust9 жыл бұрын
+Raymond K Petry The sigma is famous to non-statisticians as a statistical symbol, so by putting it on a unicorn, it reinforces the point she's making (at around 9:50) that statisticians are rare, like unicorns.
@noneya81004 жыл бұрын
You are beautiful, intelligent, well-spoken, and both interesting and entertaining. If you are straight, I want to marry you. ♥
@nighthawkviper67915 жыл бұрын
This is fun, I like cave-dwelling troglodytes; I hear they keep the keenest of numbers.